A randomized study of orlistat in combination with a weight management programme in obese patients with Type 2 diabetes treated with metformin.

AIMS: To assess the effects of orlistat vs. placebo, in combination with a weight management programme, on weight loss and metabolic control in obese patients with Type 2 diabetes. METHODS: Patients treated with either metformin alone or metformin in combination with sulphonylurea were randomized to double-blind treatment with orlistat or placebo (120 mg) three times daily, combined with a mildly reduced calorie diet and a weight management programme for 52 weeks. Changes in body weight, anthropometry, glycaemic control and lipid profile were assessed. RESULTS: After 52 weeks, orlistat-treated patients achieved an almost threefold greater reduction in weight compared with placebo recipients (-5.0% vs. -1.8%; P<0.0001). The decrease in waist circumference was significantly greater with orlistat than placebo (-4.8 cm vs. -2.8 cm; P=0.0022). Orlistat treatment was also associated with significantly greater reductions in haemoglobin A(1c) (-1.1% vs. -0.2%; P<0.0001), fasting plasma glucose (-1.9 mmol/l vs. -0.3 mmol/l; P<0.0001), total cholesterol (-0.2 mmol/l vs. 0.1 mmol/l; P=0.03) and apolipoprotein B (-0.08 g/l vs. 0.01 g/l; P=0.0085) and greater improvements in beta-cell function (P=0.031) and insulin resistance (P=0.001) assessed using the homeostasis model assessment (HOMA). Similar results were obtained for subgroups of patients treated with metformin alone or metformin in combination with sulphonylurea. Orlistat treatment reduced the requirement for anti-diabetic medication more than placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Orlistat, in combination with a reduced calorie diet and a weight management programme, promotes weight loss and clinically relevant improvements in glycaemic control and other cardiovascular risk factors in obese patients with Type 2 diabetes.     

Troglitazone in combination with sulphonylurea improves glycaemic control in Type 2 diabetic patients inadequately controlled by sulphonylurea therapy alone. Troglitazone Study Group.

AIM: The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of troglitazone (a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma agonist developed primarily for the treatment of Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM)), 100 or 200mg/day, in terms of glycaemic control, lipid profile and tolerability, when given in addition to existing sulphonylurea therapy. METHODS: A 16-week, randomized, parallel-group placebo-controlled trial in 259 Type 2 diabetic patients already on sulphonylurea therapy. RESULTS: At week 16, adjusted geometric mean HbA1c with troglitazone 100mg (7.7%; P=0.023) and 200mg (7.4%; P<0.001) was lower with sulphonylurea alone (8.2%). At all weeks, adjusted geometric mean fasting serum glucose levels were lower in both troglitazone groups, compared with sulphonylurea alone (P=0.007 to P<0.001). At week 16, both troglitazone groups showed reductions in immune reactive insulin compared with sulphonylurea alone (200mg, 13%; P=0.032: 100mg, 5%; NS). Troglitazone reduced serum levels of nonesterified fatty acids at week 16 (100 g, 12%; P=0.042) and at all weeks (200mg, 17-24%; P=0.014 to P<0.001). The incidence of drug-related adverse events was similar in all groups (23-24% of patients). There was no apparent association between hypoglycaemia and the addition of troglitazone to sulphonylurea therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Troglitazone 100 or 200 mg added to usual sulphonylurea therapy in patients with Type 2 DM is associated with a significant improvement in glycaemic control, without altering the adverse-event profile of the sulphonylurea.     

Impaired fibrinolytic compensation for hypercoagulability in obese patients with type 2 diabetes: association with increased plasminogen activator inhibitor-1

In patients with type 2 diabetes, fibrinolysis is considered impaired by increased plasma concentrations of plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI)-1. However, several investigators found both coagulation and fibrinolysis to be activated in these patients. We further characterized the balance between coagulation and fibrinolysis in lean and obese patients with type 2 diabetes. We studied 112 type 2 diabetic patients (66 lean, 46 obese) and 69 age-matched healthy subjects (46 lean, 23 obese). We measured plasma concentrations of fibrinogen and prothrombin F1+2 (F1+2) as indicating coagulation activity and plasmin-antiplasmin complex (PAP) and D dimer as indicating fibrinolytic activity. Plasma PAI-1 concentrations also were determined. Plasma concentrations of F1+2, PAP, D dimer, and PAI-1 were higher in diabetic patients than in control subjects. Plasma fibrinogen and F1+2 were similar between lean and obese diabetic patients, but plasma PAP and D dimer were significantly lower in obese than lean diabetic patients (P <.0001, P =.0194, respectively). By multivariate analysis, plasma PAI-1 and body mass index (BMI) were independent factors in diabetic patients predicting PAP, while BMI and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)) independently predicted D dimer. Plasma PAI-1 concentrations were significantly higher in obese than lean diabetic patients (P <.0001). In conclusions, both coagulation and fibrinolytic systems are enhanced in lean and obese type 2 diabetic patients compared with healthy subjects. Although the degree of activation of coagulation was similar between lean and obese diabetic patients, the fibrinolytic activity was lower in obese than lean patients. Fibrinolytic compensation for hypercoagulation is incomplete in obese patients with type 2 diabetes, partly because of elevated PAI-1 in the blood.     

Correction of hyperglycaemia reduces insulin resistance and serum soluble E-selectin levels in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus.

AIMS: To investigate the effects of glycaemic control on insulin sensitivity and serum concentrations of soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule (sVCAM)-1 and E-selectin (sE-selectin) in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus. To examine whether reductions in serum adhesion molecule levels correlate with improvement in insulin resistance. METHODS: A total of 54 patients with Type 2 diabetes were treated for 4 weeks with either diet alone, sulphonylurea or insulin. Fasting glucose, insulin sensitivity, lipids, sVCAM-1, and sE-selectin levels were measured before and after treatment. RESULTS: All treatment modalities successfully corrected hyperglycemia. Reductions in blood glucose levels resulted in improvement in insulin sensitivity (diet KITT 2.40 +/- 0.26-3.09 +/- 0.36, P < 0.01; sulphonylurea 2.24 +/- 0.16-2.94 +/- 0.18, P < 0.01; insulin 1.68 +/- 0.27-2.16 +/- 0.22%/min, P < 0.05), and decrease in sE-selectin levels (diet 88.4 +/- 14.9-66.2 +/- 10.8, P < 0.05; sulphonylurea 85.1 +/- 11.6-59.8 +/- 7.8, P < 0.01; insulin 84.4 +/- 8.7-66.8 +/- 7.4 ng/ml, P < 0.01), but no change in sVCAM-1 levels. There was a significant correlation between the degree of decrease in sE-selectin levels and improvement in insulin sensitivity (r = -0.38, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Correction of hyperglycaemia, independent of treatment modality, resulted in improvement of insulin resistance and decrease in sE-selectin levels. These changes might, in part, contribute to reduce the risk of diabetic microvascular and macrovascular complications in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus.     

The contribution of metformin to glycaemic control in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus receiving combination therapy with insulin

Combination therapy of oral hypoglycaemic agents and insulin is a therapeutic option for those who have deterioration in glycaemic control. We examined the contribution of metformin by withdrawing it from Type 2 diabetic patients who had been stabilised on combination therapy. Fifty-one subjects with Type 2 diabetes and secondary oral hypoglycaemic agent failure were studied in a randomised, open and parallel study. In the first phase of 36 weeks, subjects were stabilised on combined therapy of sulphonylureas and nocturnal insulin, with or without metformin. During the second phase, metformin was withdrawn. The primary variables for efficacy were HbA(1c), fasting plasma glucose and 3-point capillary blood glucose profiles. After stabilisation with combination therapy, those subjects on metformin used less insulin to maintain glycaemic control (13.7+/-6.8 vs. 23.0+/-9.4 U/day, P=0.001) and had lower HbA(1c) values (8.13+/-0.89 vs. 9.05+/-1.30%, P=0.003) compared with those not given metformin. Withdrawal of metformin therapy caused deterioration in HbA(1c) (P=0.001). This study confirms that metformin plays an important role in the success of the combination therapy. The rational use of metformin and sulphonylurea together with insulin will help to improve metabolic control in Type 2 diabetes patients who have secondary drug failure.     

Rosiglitazone in Type 2 diabetes mellitus: an evaluation in British Indo-Asian patients.

AIMS: To evaluate the effectiveness of rosiglitazone in reducing hyperglycaemia in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) of Indo-Asian origin taking concurrent sulphonylurea therapy. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of 26 weeks' duration at 31 primary and secondary care centres in areas of the UK with a high Indo-Asian population, including 177 patients aged 28-78 years. Rosiglitazone 8 mg/day or matching placebo was added to existing sulphonylurea therapy. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in glycosylated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at week 26. RESULTS: The mean changes in HbA1c were -1.16% with rosiglitazone (baseline 9.21%) and +0.26% with placebo (baseline 9.06%) (treatment difference P < 0.001; 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.81, -1.08). HbA1c fell below 8% in 55% and 19% of patients, respectively (treatment difference P < 0.001; 95% CI 0.22, 0.51). The greatest improvements occurred in patients whose glycaemic control was initially poor. Improvements in homeostasis model assessment of insulin sensitivity and pancreatic beta-cell function with rosiglitazone were not accompanied by a change in plasma insulin or C-peptide after 26 weeks. Free fatty acids fell by 0.09 mmol/l with rosiglitazone and increased by 0.03 mmol/l with placebo (treatment difference P < 0.001; 95% CI -0.19, -0.07). CONCLUSION: Rosiglitazone improved insulin sensitivity, pancreatic beta-cell function, and glycaemic control in Indo-Asian patients with Type 2 DM who are at greater risk of the complications of Type 2 DM than other ethnic groups.     

Circulating IGF-I concentrations are low and not correlated to glycaemic control in adults with type 1 diabetes

OBJECTIVE: To study plasma concentrations of insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) in adults with type 1 diabetes (IDDM) in comparison with a reference population, and the influence of glycaemic control, dose of insulin, and sex on the concentration of circulating IGF-I in IDDM. DESIGN AND METHODS: Patients with type 1 diabetes were recruited consecutively from our outpatient diabetes unit. In all, 79 men and 55 women aged 20-60 years with a disease duration >/=6 years (range 6-51 years) took part in the study. A reference population of 80 men and 83 women aged 20-60 years was randomly obtained from the population registry. IGF-I was measured with radioimmunoassay after acid-ethanol extraction. RESULTS: Mean +/- s. d. values of IGF-I were lower in patients with diabetes (146+/-66 microg/l) than in controls (238+/-83 microg/l, P<0.001). Those with diabetes had lower IGF-I concentrations in all age groups and the differences were highly significant in all decades except in women aged 50-59 years. IGF-I was negatively correlated with age in patients and controls. No correlation was found between IGF-I and glycaemic control measured as haemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)) in the patients. IGF-I was positively associated with the dose of insulin/kg body weight in male patients independently of age, HbA(1c) and body mass index (P<0.03), but not in female patients (P=0.14). CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that IGF-I concentrations are low in adult patients with type 1 diabetes with a disease duration >/=6 years, independently of glycaemic control. This suggests that subcutaneous insulin substitution is inadequate to normalize circulating IGF-I concentrations in patients without endogenous insulin secretion.     

Sulphonylurea therapy doubles B-cell response to glucose in Type 2 diabetic patients

Summary The effect of sulphonylurea therapy for 3 weeks on glucose-stimulated insulin secretion and insulin resistance was studied in Type 2 diabetic patients. The fasting plasma insulin and C-peptide concentrations on diet alone were compared with each subject's fasting concentrations on sulphonylurea treatment at a lower fasting plasma glucose and at the original diet-alone glycaemic level obtained by the hyperglycaemic clamp technique. At this isoglycaemic level (mean 11 mmol/l), plasma insulin levels increased from 6.9 mU/l on diet alone to 12.1 mU/l on sulphonylurea treatment (p<0.01). The subjects were also studied by the hyperglycaemic clamp technique at mean glycaemic levels of 13 mmol/l before and after sulphonylurea treatment; the incremental insulin response was similarly enhanced from 7.6±3.5 to 13.7±6.9 mU/l (p<0.02) respectively. Sulphonylureas appear to reduce glycaemia by enhancing B-cell function two-fold. In the patients studied this was from approximately 21% to 37% of a normal response. Insulin resistance assessed by the same hyperglycaemic clamps as endogenous plasma insulin concentrations divided by glucose infusion rates was unchanged by sulphonylurea therapy (mean 4.37 compared to 4.40 mU. 1^–1·mg^–1·kg·min on diet alone).     

Plasma interleukin-6 levels are increased in subjects with impaired glucose tolerance but not in those with impaired fasting glucose in a cohort of Italian Caucasians

BACKGROUND: While the relationship between impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and circulating interleukin-6 (IL-6) is well established, there is no information whether IL-6 levels are elevated in impaired fasting glucose (IFG). METHODS: To this end, we examined the relationship between plasma IL-6 concentration and different degrees of glucose homeostasis in a cohort of 470 Italian Caucasian subjects comprising 236 normal glucose tolerant (NGT), 49 IFG, 51 IGT, and 134 type 2 diabetic subjects. RESULTS: We observed that IL-6, CRP and fibrinogen levels were higher in subjects with IGT or type 2 diabetes as compared with NGT and IFG subjects. Univariate correlations between IL-6 concentrations and metabolic variables in the whole cohort showed that IL-6 levels were positively correlated with age, BMI, waist, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, fasting plasma glucose, triglycerides, CRP, fibrinogen, and negatively correlated with insulin sensitivity, IGF-I and HDL. In a subgroup analysis including NGT, IFG and IGT (n = 336), IL-6 levels were positively correlated with age, BMI, waist, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, triglycerides, CRP, fibrinogen, fasting insulin, 2 h post-load glucose, and negatively correlated with insulin sensitivity, IGF-I and HDL. Stepwise linear regression analysis in a model including gender, age, BMI, waist, glucose tolerance status, fasting plasma glucose, 2 h post-load glucose, triglycerides, HDL, fasting insulin, and insulin sensitivity revealed that waist was the only independent variable associated with IL-6 levels accounting for 21.0% of its variation (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: These data show that IGT and type 2 diabetes, but not IFG, are associated with elevated plasma IL-6 levels.     

Impaired glucose tolerance is associated with increased serum concentrations of interleukin 6 and co-regulated acute-phase proteins but not TNF-α or its receptors

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: A population-based sample was studied to define immune abnormalities in individuals at risk of Type II (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus because of impaired glucose tolerance. METHODS: A total of 1653 individuals aged 55 to 74 years participated in a population based survey in Southern Germany (KORA Survey 2000). Those without a history of diabetes were subjected to an OGTT. Randomly selected subjects with IGT ( n=80) were compared with non-diabetic control subjects ( n=77) and patients with Type II diabetes ( n=152) of the same population-based sample after matching for age and sex. Immune parameters were analysed in serum with rigidly evaluated ELISA. RESULTS: Serum pro-inflammatory cytokine interleukin 6 (IL-6) concentrations were higher in subjects with IGT and Type II diabetes than in the control subjects (median 1.8 and 2.5 vs 0.8 pg/ml, p<0.0001). Soluble IL-6 receptors potentiate IL-6 bioactivity and their concentrations were mildly increased in Type II diabetes ( p<0.05). These immune changes seem relevant because IL-6 dependent acute-phase proteins C-reactive protein, serum amyloid A protein and fibrinogen were also increased in IGT and Type II diabetes. Circulating concentrations of TNF-alpha and its two receptors sTNF-R60 and sTNF-R80 were not increased in IGT subjects compared with the control subjects. CONCLUSION/INTERPRETATION: Our study shows systemic up-regulation of selected inflammatory mediators in patients with Type II diabetes and IGT. The pattern observed is non-random and fits with an IL-6 associated rather than TNF-alpha associated response.     

A double blind study of the effect of acipimox on serum lipids, blood glucose control and insulin action in non-obese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Hyperlipidaemia, in particular raised concentrations of serum triglycerides, together with raised plasma non-esterified fatty acid concentrations, is common in patients with Type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus and may be associated with insulin insensitivity. Thirty non-obese Type 2 diabetic patients (15 controlled with diet alone and 15 with diet plus oral sulphonylurea therapy) were therefore recruited to take part in a double-blind, randomized, crossover comparison of acipimox (250 mg three times daily for 3 months) and placebo. Serum lipids, blood glucose control, insulin sensitivity, and glucose tolerance were measured before and after each treatment period. There was a significant decrease in serum triglycerides (2.05 +/- 1.08 vs 2.91 +/- 1.75: p < 0.005), cholesterol (5.66 +/- 1.02 vs 6.26 +/- 1.17: p = 0.0005), and apoprotein B (1.32 +/- 0.23 vs 1.44 +/- 0.25: p < 0.05) while HDL cholesterol and apoprotein A-1 concentrations were unchanged. There was no change in blood glucose control measured by fasting glucose, insulin, and HBA, concentrations, but there was a significant improvement in insulin action assessed by glucose-insulin infusion. Although plasma non-esterified fatty acid concentrations were lower during the oral glucose tolerance test after acipimox, there was no difference in either the peak or 2-h plasma glucose concentrations and the total area under the glucose curve did not change. Acipimox was well tolerated and no patients withdrew from the study for drug-related symptoms. Thus, acipimox effectively lowers serum cholesterol and triglycerides in patients with Type 2 diabetes without adversely altering blood glucose control, and appears to improve insulin sensitivity.     

Plasma fibrinogen in diabetes mellitus.

Plasma fibrinogen was measured in 285 diabetics (age range 15-85 years) and 209 controls (age range 23-74 years). Plasma fibrinogen concentration showed a positive skew distribution and an approximate normal distribution was obtained by log transformation. The mean log plasma fibrinogen in the diabetics was significantly increased (p less than 0.0001). Patients treated with a sulphonylurea (n = 81) had the highest mean log plasma fibrinogen concentration and this was significantly higher than in patients treated with insulin (n = 76; p less than 0.01), biguanides (n = 28; p less than 0.01) or sulphonyluera plus biguanides (n = 38; p less than 0.05). The biganide treated group had the lowest mean log plasma fibrinogen concentrations. No correlation was found between plasma fibrinogen and blood glucose, duration of diabetes or the presence of complications. Subjects with proliferative retinopathy (n = 38) had a similar mean plasma fibrinogen to those with background retinopathy (n = 55). Twenty-two maturity onset diabetics treated with a sulphonylurea and followed prospectively showed a significant increase in plasma fibrinogen after five months (p less than 0.0001), while a control diet treated group showed no alteration in plasma fibrinogen. It is concluded that plasma fibrinogen is significantly increased in diabetics and apart from age, the main factor related to the increase is treatment with sulphonylureas. It remains speculative whether this association has any correlation with long term cardiovascular morbidity.     

Addition of low-dose rosiglitazone to sulphonylurea therapy improves glycaemic control in Type 2 diabetic patients.

AIMS: This study was designed to test the efficacy and safety of low-dose rosiglitazone, a potent, insulin-sensitizing thiazolidinedione, in combination with sulphonylurea in Type 2 diabetic patients. METHODS: For the intention-to-treat analysis, 574 patients (59% male, mean age 61 years) were available, randomized to receive 26 weeks of twice-daily placebo (n = 192), rosiglitazone 1 mg (n = 199) or rosiglitazone 2 mg (n = 183) in addition to existing sulphonylurea treatment with gliclazide (47.6% of patients), glibenclamide (41.8%) or glipizide (9.4%) (two patients were taking carbutamide or glimepiride). Change in haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), fructosamine, insulin, C-peptide, albumin, and lipids were measured, and safety was evaluated. RESULTS: Mean baseline HbA1c was 9.2% and FPG was 11.4 mmol/l. Rosiglitazone at doses of 1 and 2 mg b.d. plus sulphonylurea produced significant decreases, compared with sulphonylurea plus placebo, in HbA1c (-0.59% and -1.03%, respectively; both P<0.0001) and FPG (1.35 mmol/l and 2.44 mmol/l, respectively; both P<0.0001). Both HDL-cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol increased and potentially beneficial decreases in non-esterified fatty acids and gamma glutamyl transpeptidase levels were seen in both rosiglitazone groups. The overall incidence of adverse experiences was similar in all three treatment groups, with no significant cardiac events, hypoglycaemia or hepatotoxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the combination of rosiglitazone and a sulphonylurea was safe, well tolerated and effective in patients with Type 2 diabetes.     

Long-term effects of pioglitazone and metformin on insulin sensitivity in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus.

AIM: Despite their comparable glycaemic effects in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), pioglitazone and metformin may have different effects on insulin sensitivity because they have different mechanisms of action. We studied the changes in insulin sensitivity, as assessed by the Quantitative Insulin Sensitivity Check Index (QUICKI), in patients with T2DM who used metformin or pioglitazone as monotherapy or in combination therapy with sulphonylurea. METHODS: Data in this report are from two multicentre, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy studies conducted in Europe (monotherapy) or in Europe and Canada (combination therapy study). Patients were randomized to 52 weeks of treatment consisting of a 12-week forced titration period and a 40-week maintenance period. HbA(1c), fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and fasting serum insulin (FSI) were quantified from a single blood sample at weeks 0, 8, 16, 24, 32, 42 and 52. Insulin sensitivity was assessed with QUICKI, which is calculated from FSI and fasting blood glucose (FBG) concentrations using the formula 1/(log(10) FSI + log(10) FBG). Time course effects of the treatments were compared by repeated measures analysis of covariance. RESULTS: As monotherapy, pioglitazone and metformin increased QUICKI compared with baseline (baseline vs. end point [mean +/- sem]; pioglitazone [0.303 +/- 0.001 vs. 0.321 +/- 0.001; P < 0.001] and metformin [0.304 +/- 0.001 vs. 0.315 +/- 0.001; P < 0.001]). Pioglitazone increased insulin sensitivity more than metformin from week 4 through week 52. There were significant increases in QUICKI from baseline in both combination therapy groups (baseline vs. end point; pioglitazone + sulphonylurea [0.305 +/- 0.001 vs. 0.319 +/- 0.001; P < 0.001] and metformin + sulphonylurea [0.306 +/- 0.001 vs. 0.317 +/- 0.001; P < 0.001]). Overall, pioglitazone + sulphonylurea significantly increased insulin sensitivity more than metformin + sulphonylurea. CONCLUSION: Pioglitazone differed from metformin in its effects on insulin sensitivity despite both drugs having comparable glycaemic effects.     

The role of sulphonylurea in combination therapy assessed in a trial of sulphonylurea withdrawal. Scandinavian Insulin-Sulphonylurea Study Group Research Team.

AIMS: To evaluate the effect of adding insulin to sulphonylurea (SU) and the effect of SU withdrawal on glycaemic control in Type 2 diabetic patients who failed on treatment with SU alone. METHOD: One hundred and seventy-five patients were included in a placebo-controlled multicentre study. During phase I (4 months), premixed insulin was added to glibenclamide therapy; during phase II (1-4 months, depending on response) the insulin dose was fixed, while placebo or glibenclamide replaced the open SU therapy. Insulin sensitivity (KITT), beta-cell function (C-peptide) and metabolic control (HbA1c) were monitored. RESULTS: HbA1c improved from 9.65% to 7.23% (P < 0.0001) during phase I. A high HbA1c value (P < 0.0001) and a high KITT-value (P = 0.045) at baseline were associated with a beneficial response to combination treatment. During phase II, glycaemic control was unchanged in the control (glibenclamide) group. In the placebo group, after SU withdrawal, fasting blood glucose (FBG) increased by 10% or more within 4 weeks in 79% of the patients. Patients (67 of 112) with an FBG increase > or =40% during phase II were defined as 'SU responders' by protocol. In a multivariate analysis only a long duration of diabetes was associated with SU response. There were more GAD-antibody-positive patients among non-responders (18% vs. 4%, P = 0.0263). CONCLUSIONS: Poor glycaemic control in combination with preserved insulin sensitivity and lack of GAD antibodies predicts a beneficial response to combination therapy, which can be achieved in 75% of patients with SU failure.     

Exenatide: effect of injection time on postprandial glucose in patients with Type 2 diabetes.

AIMS: Exenatide is an incretin mimetic whose effect on glycaemic control in patients with Type 2 diabetes is currently under investigation. This study assessed the effect of injection time relative to a standardized meal on postprandial pharmacodynamics of exenatide in patients with Type 2 diabetes. METHODS: Eighteen patients participated in this single-centre, open-label, placebo-controlled, randomized, six-way crossover study. Patients received subcutaneous injections of either placebo (-15 min) or 10 microg of exenatide at -60, -15, 0, +30 or +60 min relative to a standardized breakfast meal on six consecutive days. Serial blood samples were assayed for plasma glucose and insulin concentrations. RESULTS: For all exenatide treatments, incremental postprandial glucose area under the postprandial plasma glucose curve from zero to 6 h (AUC0-6 h) was significantly reduced compared with placebo. When exenatide was administered before (-60, -15 min) or with the meal (0 min), peak postprandial glucose concentrations were significantly decreased (P < 0.0001 for all treatments) compared with placebo. Post-meal exenatide administration (+30, P < 0.05; +60 min, P = 0.21) resulted in smaller peak glucose reductions and in some patients transient low plasma glucose concentrations were reported. Peak plasma insulin concentrations in the pre-meal treatments were significantly lower than placebo (P < 0.05 for all treatments), while post-meal dosing groups exhibited a trend towards higher insulin peaks compared with placebo. The most common adverse events related to exenatide were headache, nausea, dyspepsia and vomiting, and were generally of mild-to-moderate intensity. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, all exenatide treatments demonstrated reductions in postprandial plasma glucose excursions compared with placebo. Pre-meal and with meal administration of exenatide produced greater reduction of postprandial glucose excursions compared with post-meal administration. These data support flexible dosing of exenatide at any time within 60 min before a meal.     

Effects of glimepiride on HbA(1c) and body weight in Type 2 diabetes: results of a 1.5-year follow-up study

Sulphonylureas are effective and well tolerated in patients with Type 2 diabetes, but may be associated with weight gain, and lack of compliance due to multiple daily dosing. This open, uncontrolled surveillance study examined the efficacy and safety of glimepiride, a new sulphonylurea, administered once daily in patients with Type 2 diabetes. A total of 1,770 patients were enrolled in the study, and 284 patients were selected for follow-up. Patients received 0.5 to >4 mg glimepiride once daily for 1.5 years. HbA(1c) was reduced from 8.4% at baseline to 7.1% after 4 months and 6.9% after 1 and 1.5 years (median intra-individual change from baseline: -1.4, -1.5, and -1.7%, respectively; P<0.0001). Treatment with glimepiride also resulted in significant and stable weight loss relative to baseline, with the exception of patients with a body mass index of <25 kg/m(2). Mean body weight was reduced from 79.8 kg at baseline to 77.9 kg after 4 months, 77.2 kg after 1 year, and 76.9 kg after 1.5 years (mean intra-individual change from baseline: -1.9 kg, P<0.0001; -2.9 kg, P<0.05; -3.0 kg, P<0.005, respectively). Therefore, once daily glimepiride provides effective glycaemic control, and may have advantages over other sulphonylureas, because it exhibits weight neutralizing/reducing effects in patients with Type 2 diabetes.     

The lipoprotein profile differs during insulin treatment alone and combination therapy with insulin and sulphonylureas in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus.

AIMS: To study whether changes in endogenous insulin secretion at the same glycaemic control affect the plasma concentrations of lipoproteins in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus. METHODS: Fifteen patients, age 59+/-2 years (mean +/- SEM), body weight 86.3+/-3.0kg, body mass index 29.6+/-0.9 kg/m2 were treated with sulphonylurea and insulin in combination or with insulin alone in a randomized, double-blind, crossover study. All patients were treated with a multiple daily injection regimen with the addition of glibenclamide 10.5 mg daily or placebo tablets. RESULTS: During combination therapy, the dose of insulin was 25% less (P < 0.002) and there was a 29% increase in plasma C-peptide concentration (P = 0.01). Plasma levels of free insulin were not changed. Plasma levels of sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) and insulin-like growth factor-binding protein (IGFBP)-1 were lowered. There were no differences in the 24-h blood glucose profiles or HbA1c (6.0+/-0.2 vs. 6.3+/-0.2%; P = 0.16). Body weight was similar. There was a significant decrease in plasma LDL cholesterol (3.04+/-0.24 vs. 3.41+/-0.21 mmol/l; P = 0.04), apolipoprotein A1 and of lipoprotein(a) but an increase in VLDL-triglycerides (1.36+/-0.31 vs. 0.96+/-0.16 mmol/l; P = 0.02) during combination therapy. The ratio between LDL cholesterol and apolipoprotein B concentrations was significantly lower during combination therapy (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Combination therapy with insulin and sulphonylureas increases portal insulin supply and thereby alters liver lipoprotein metabolism when compared with insulin therapy alone.     

Initial monotherapy with either metformin or sulphonylureas often fails to achieve or maintain current glycaemic goals in patients with Type 2 diabetes in UK primary care.

AIMS: To describe initial achievement of glycaemic targets and subsequent hyperglycaemia in patients with Type 2 diabetes managed with oral agent monotherapy in UK primary care from 1998 to 2004. METHODS: Electronic medical records of patients initiating metformin (n = 3362) or a sulphonylurea agent (n = 3070) in 290 UK primary care practices were retrieved from the General Practice Research Database (GPRD). Patients included had an HbA(1c) recorded 0-90 days before and 90-365 days after initiating monotherapy. The probability of achieving glycaemic thresholds in the first year, and for those achieving such targets, the probability of inadequate glycaemic control (HbA(1c) > 6.5%, > 7.0%, > 7.5%) over time is described. RESULTS: Low baseline HbA(1c) and drug initiation within 3 months of diabetes diagnosis were the strongest predictors of initial achievement of glycaemic targets. The proportion of patients with diabetes duration > or = 4 months who achieved HbA(1c) < 7% in the first year ranged from 24% to 88% for highest to lowest baseline HbA(1c) category in sulphonylurea initiators and from 19% to 86% in metformin initiators, with slightly higher proportions for newly diagnosed patients. Kaplan-Meier analyses suggested that 55% and 70% of patients who initially achieved glycaemic targets had HbA(1c) measurements above these targets at 2 and 3 years. CONCLUSIONS: Many patients fail to achieve glycaemic goals with initial monotherapy and, of those who achieve current goals, few consistently maintain these targets over 3 years. Research is needed to evaluate whether more aggressive treatment or alternative treatments can improve the long-term maintenance of glycaemic control in patients with Type 2 diabetes.     

The blood glucose lowering effects of exercise and glibenclamide in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus

Physical exercise is associated with a fall in serum insulin levels, whereas sulphonylurea administration increases insulin release. To date, the opposing effects of exercise and sulphonylurea administration have not been systematically studied in Type 2 diabetic patients, who are not infrequently treated with sulphonylureas. In this study nine patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus were subjected to four treatments in random order on separate days: (A) endurance exercise after the administration of 3.5 mg glibenclamide; (B) as A but given only 1.75 mg glibenclamide; (C) as A but with placebo; (D) rest and administration of 1.75 mg glibenclamide. Exercise and placebo resulted in only a small decrease in glycaemia. Rest and administration of 1.75 mg glibenclamide led to a moderate but steady fall in blood glucose concentrations. If glibenclamide administration and exercise were combined, blood glucose concentrations declined more markedly. Serum insulin concentrations showed a physiological decrease during exercise and placebo administration. If patients rested after administration of glibenclamide serum insulin levels rose and remained elevated. When exercise and glibenclamide were combined the rise in serum insulin levels was blunted and insulin levels fell once exercise was begun. Thus, exercise attenuates the glibenclamide induced increase in serum insulin in moderately hyperglycaemic Type 2 diabetic patients. Nevertheless, exercise has a substantial hypoglycaemic effect in glibenclamide treated Type 2 diabetic patients. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.