Effect of a population-based educational intervention focusing on end-of-life home care, life-prolonging treatment and knowledge about palliative care

The effectiveness of population-based educational interventions in palliative care is unclear. We conducted an educational intervention study for the general public focusing on end-of-life home care, life-prolonging treatment and knowledge about palliative care and measured the change in perception about these issues. Participants were recruited from the 11 districts of Fukushima City, Japan. One-hour educational lectures were conducted in each district from April 2006 to March 2007. Meetings were held in a community centre or hall in each district. We asked participants to fill in a questionnaire before and after the educational lecture. Of 607 participants, 595 (98%) answered both pre- and post-intervention questionnaires. The feasibility of a home death changed from 9% before to 34% after the intervention (P < 0.001). In addition, preference for life-prolonging treatment and attitudes toward end-of-life care including symptom management at home, misconceptions about opioids, artificial hydration and communication issues between patient and medical practitioners were significantly improved after the intervention. Factors that were significantly associated with changing perceptions about the feasibility of a home death were male gender, change in beliefs regarding burden to family caregivers, anxiety regarding admission to the hospital with worsening physical condition and fear that pain would not be relieved at home. This population-based educational intervention was effective in changing beliefs regarding the feasibility of home care, preference for life-prolonging treatment and attitudes toward end-of-life care.     

Assessment of physiatrists' knowledge and perspectives on the use of opioids: review of basic concepts for managing chronic pain.

Previous studies of physicians have elucidated knowledge gaps and misconceptions about the use of opioids for the treatment of chronic pain. The recent approval of a pain management subspecialty certification for physiatrists will create higher expectations of the field regarding the treatment of chronic pain. Five hundred randomly chosen physiatrists were surveyed with a 50.6% response rate. Ninety-eight percent of respondents treat patients with chronic noncancer pain diagnoses, and 37% occasionally treat patients with cancer-related pain. Seventy percent of respondents underestimated the percentage of patients with cancer-related pain that could experience relief with oral analgesics. Only 17% underestimated the percentage of advanced cancer patients that experience significant pain. Eight percent of respondents incorrectly answered that a patient, regardless of diagnosis, would become addicted to opioids by taking an opioid daily. Only 25% identified the correct definition of addiction. Questions regarding side effects revealed that 10% of respondents incorrectly believed that opioid-induced respiratory depression is common in patients whose oral morphine dose exceeds 100 mg per day. Eighty percent of respondents preferred long-acting preparations, and 92% preferred set dosing schedules for the treatment of chronic pain. Rapidly evolving concepts regarding the implementation of pharmacologic regimens for chronic pain diagnoses require health care professionals who are trained to administer these treatments. Overall, the survey results are encouraging regarding physiatrists' knowledge about the use of opioids to treat patients with chronic pain.     

Treatment efficacy of neural blockade in specialized palliative care services in Japan: a multicenter audit survey

More than 85% of cancer-related pain is pharmacologically controllable, but some patients require interventional treatments. Although audit assessment of these interventions is of importance to clarify the types of patients likely to receive benefits, there have been no multicenter studies in Japan. The primary aims of this study were (1) to clarify the frequency of neural blockade in certified palliative care units and palliative care teams, (2) determine the efficacy of interventions, and (3) explore the predictors of successful or unsuccessful intervention. All patients who received neural blockade were consecutively recruited from seven certified palliative care units and five hospital palliative care teams in Japan. Primary responsible physicians reported pain intensity on the Support Team Assessment Schedule, performance status, communication levels on the Communication Capacity Scale, presence or absence of delirium, opioid consumption, and adverse effects before and one week after the procedure on the basis of retrospective chart review. A total of 162 interventions in 136 patients were obtained, comprising 3.8% of all patients receiving specialized palliative care services during the study period. Common procedures were epidural nerve block with local anesthetic and/or opioids (n = 84), neurolytic sympathetic plexus block (n = 24), and intrathecal nerve block with phenol (n = 21). There were significant differences in the frequency of neural blockade between palliative care units and palliative care teams (3.1% vs. 4.6%, respectively, P = 0.018), and between institutions whose leading physicians are anesthesiologists or have other specialties (4.8% vs. 1.5%, respectively, P < 0.001). Pain intensity measured on the Support Team Assessment Schedule (2.9 +/- 0.8 to 1.7 +/- 0.9, P < 0.001), performance status (2.7 +/- 1.0 to 2.4 +/- 1.0, P < 0.001), and opioid consumption (248 +/- 348 to 186 +/- 288 mg morphine equivalent/day, P < 0.001) were significantly improved after interventions. There was a tendency toward improvement in the communication level measured on the Communication Capacity Scale. There was no significant improvement in the prevalence of delirium, but six patients (32%) recovered from delirium after interventions. Adverse effects occurred in 9.2%, but all were predictable or transient. No fatal complications were reported. Pain intensity was significantly more improved in patients who survived 28 days or longer than others (P = 0.002). There were no significant correlations of changes in pain intensity with the performance status or previous opioid consumption. In conclusion, neural blockade was performed in 3.8% of cancer patients who received specialized palliative care services in Japan. Neural blockade could contribute to the improvement of pain intensity, performance service status, and opioid consumption without unpredictable serious side effects.     

Physician attitudes toward palliative care at a community teaching hospital

The goals of the study were to explore physicians' attitudes and opinions about palliative care and its implementation. Four focus groups composed of attending physicians were conducted by a professional facilitator at a community teaching hospital. The audio-tapes of the groups were carefully transcribed and analyzed according to rigorous qualitative methodology. Physicians perceived palliative care and pain control as important. Problems they perceived were a lack of education for physicians, residents, other health care professionals, and the general public; a lack of hospital support systems to implement palliative care appropriately, and a lack of knowledge and support regarding legal considerations. They believed that a palliative care unit was a reasonable tool to overcome many obstacles to good end-of-life care.     

Attitudes and beliefs of palliative care physicians regarding communication with terminally ill cancer patients

The subject of communication between palliative care physicians and their patients regarding their diagnosis and prognosis has not been extensively researched. The purpose of this survey was to compare the attitudes and beliefs of palliative care specialists regarding communication with the terminally ill in Europe, South America, and Canada. A sample of palliative care physicians from South America (Argentina and Brazil), French-speaking Europe, and Canada were identified, and posted a questionnaire. Physicians who stated that they practised palliative care at least 30% of their time were considered evaluable as palliative care specialists. Of a total of 272 questionnaires, 228 were returned (84%); and 182/228 (81%) respondents were considered to be palliative care specialists. Palliative care physicians in all three regions believed that cancer patients should be informed of their diagnosis and the terminal nature of their illness. Physicians reported that at least 60% of their patients knew their diagnosis and the terminal stage of their illness in 52% and 24% of cases in South America, and 69% and 38% of cases in Europe, respectively. All physicians agreed that 'do not resuscitate' orders should be present, and should be discussed with the patient in all cases. While 93% of Canadian physicians stated that at least 60% of their patients wanted to know about the terminal stage of their illness, only 18% of South American, and 26% of European physicians said this (P < 0.001). Similar results were found when the physicians were asked the percentage of families who want patients to know the terminal stage of their illness. However, almost all of the physicians agreed that if they had terminal cancer they would like to know. There was a significant association between patient based decision-making and female sex (P = 0.007), older age (P = 0.04), and physicians from Canada and South America (P < 0.001). Finally, in their daily decision making, South American physicians were significantly more likely to support beneficence and justice as compared with autonomy. Canadian physicians were more likely to support autonomy as compared with beneficence. In summary, our findings suggest that there are major regional differences in the attitudes and beliefs of physicians regarding communication at the end of life. More research is badly needed on the attitudes and beliefs of patients, families, and health care professionals in different regions of the world.     

Providing end-of-life care to patients: critical care nurses' perceived obstacles and supportive behaviors.

BACKGROUND: Critical care nurses care for dying patients daily. The process of dying in an intensive care unit is complicated, and research on specific obstacles that impede delivery of end-of-life care and/or supportive behaviors that help in delivery of end-of-life care is limited. OBJECTIVE: To measure critical care nurses' perceptions of the intensity and frequency of occurrence of (1) obstacles to providing end-of-life care and (2) supportive behaviors that help in providing end-of-life care in the intensive care unit. METHODS: An experimental, posttest-only, control-group design was used. A national, geographically dispersed, random sample of members of the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses was surveyed. RESULTS: The response rate was 61.3%, 864 usable responses from 1409 eligible respondents. The highest scoring obstacles were frequent telephone calls from patients' family members for information, patients' families who did not understand the term lifesaving measures, and physicians disagreeing about the direction of a dying patient's care. The highest scoring supportive behaviors were allowing patients' family members adequate time alone with patients after death, providing peaceful and dignified bedside scenes after death, and teaching patients' families how to act around a dying patient. CONCLUSIONS: The biggest obstacles to appropriate end-of-life care in the intensive care unit are behaviors of patients' families that remove nurses from caring for patients, behaviors that prolong patients' suffering or cause patients pain, and physicians' disagreement about the plan of care.     

The development of cancer pain management and palliative care over the last 5 years in Japan

After the release of the World Health Organization guidelines in 1986, palliative care units (PCUs) were authorized to offer effective cancer pain management under the Japanese National Health Insurance in 1990. Although the number of PCUs increased to more than 100 during this decade, they could only cover 5% of all terminal-stage cancer patients in Japan. Due to the resistance to opioids together with the delay in establishing oncology practice, palliative care including cancer pain management was offered only to terminal cancer patients in PCUs, and cancer pain management did not improve sufficiently in general practice during the 1990s. To change the situation, the concept of hospital-based palliative care teams (HPCTs) were introduced into general hospitals and covered by the National Health Insurance in 2002. The HPCT mainly acts as a consultation team to help primary physicians or nurses who care for cancer patients in a general hospital. After the initiation of HPCTs, the role of palliative care in Japan is gradually changing because the HPCTs have been required to cover not only the terminal phase, but also overall cancer care. In addition to the spread of HPCTs, the types and formulations of opioids available and education on cancer pain management has also improved during the last 5 years. To further improve cancer pain management and palliative care in Japan, a triangle system should be established to offer seamless care in all healthcare settings based on the coordination among PCUs, general hospitals with HPCTs, and home-based care. This is referred to as a “palliative care program”.     

Important aspects of end-of-life care among veterans: implications for measurement and quality improvement

To identify aspects of end-of-life care in the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) health care system that are not assessed by existing survey instruments and to identify issues that may be unique to veterans, telephone interviews using open-ended questions were conducted with family members of veterans who had received care from a VA facility in the last month of life. Responses were compared to validated end-of-life care assessment instruments in common use. The study took place in four VA medical centers and one family member per patient was invited to participate, selected from medical records using predefined eligibility criteria. These family members were asked to describe positive and negative aspects of the care the veteran received in the last month of life. Interview questions elicited perceptions of care both at VA sites and at non-VA sites. Family reports were coded and compared with items in five existing prospective and retrospective instruments that assess the quality of care that patients receive near the end of life. Interviews were completed with 66 family members and revealed 384 codes describing both positive and negative aspects of care during the last month of life. Almost half of these codes were not represented in any of the five reference instruments (n=174; 45%). These codes, some of which are unique to the veteran population, were grouped into eight categories: information about VA benefits (n=36; 55%), inpatient care (n=36; 55%), access to care (n=33; 50%), transitions in care (n=32; 48%), care that the veteran received at the time of death (n=31; 47%), home care (n=26; 40%), health care facilities (n=12; 18%), and mistakes and complications (n=18; 27%). Although most of the reference instruments assessed some aspect of these categories, they did not fully capture the experiences described by our respondents. These data suggest that many aspects of veterans' end-of-life care that are important to their families are not assessed by existing survey instruments. VA efforts to evaluate end-of-life care for veterans should not only measure common aspects of care (e.g., pain management), but also examine performance in areas that are more specific to the veteran population.     

Catalonia WHO palliative care demonstration project at 15 Years (2005)

Since 1990, a wide range of palliative care services has been implemented throughout the Catalan Health Care System. In 2005, 21,400 patients received palliative care; 59% had cancer (79.4% of all cancer patients) and 41% had other noncancer diagnoses (25.0%-56.5% of all noncancer patients). Today, more than 95% of Catalonia is covered by palliative care services. Fourteen districts have comprehensive palliative care networks. A total of 140 full-time physicians work in 183 specialty programs, including 63 palliative care units (with a total of 552 beds), 34 hospital consult teams, 70 home care teams, 16 outpatient clinics, and specialized pediatric and HIV/AIDS consult teams. Opioid consumption increased from 3.5mg per capita in 1989 to 21 mg per capita population in 2004. The cost of the specialist palliative care network is more than 40 million Euros annually. However, the cost efficiency is striking. Due to the radical change in the use of acute and emergency beds, the project saves the Catalan Health Care System an estimated 48 million Euros annually, a net savings of 8 million Euros annually. Additional preliminary data suggest that symptom control and patient/family satisfaction are both improved by these services.     

End-of-life issues in intensive care units: a national random survey of nurses' knowledge and beliefs.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the knowledge, beliefs, and ethical concerns of nurses caring for patients dying in intensive care units. METHODS: A survey was mailed to 3000 members of the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses. The survey contained various scenarios depicting end-of-life actions for patients: pain management, withholding or withdrawing life support, assisted suicide, and voluntary and nonvoluntary euthanasia. RESULTS: Most of the respondents (N = 906) correctly identified the distinctions among the end-of-life actions depicted in the scenarios. Almost all (99%-100%) agreed with the actions of pain management and withholding or withdrawing life support. A total of 83% disagreed with assisted suicide, 95% disagreed with voluntary euthanasia, and 89% to 98% disagreed with nonvoluntary euthanasia. Most (78%) thought that dying patients frequently (31%) or sometimes (47%) received inadequate pain medicine, and almost all agreed with the double-effect principle. Communication between nurses and physicians was generally effective, but unit-level conferences that focused on grief counseling and debriefing staff rarely (38%) or never (49%) occurred. Among the respondents, 37% had been asked to assist in hastening a patient's death. Although 59% reported that they seldom acted against their consciences in caring for dying patients, 34% indicated that they sometimes had acted against their conscience, and 6% had done so to a great extent. CONCLUSIONS: Intensive care unit nurses strongly support good pain management for dying patients and withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining therapies to allow unavoidable death. The vast majority oppose assisted suicide and euthanasia. Wider professional and public dialogue on end-of-life care in intensive care units is warranted.     

Changes in medical and nursing care in cancer patients transferred from a palliative care team to a palliative care unit

The primary aim of this study was to explore the changes in medical/nursing care in patients who transferred from a palliative care team (PCT) to a palliative care unit (PCU) in the same hospital, and to explore the reasons why new or modified interventions were required. This was a retrospective study of 50 consecutive patients who were transferred from PCT to PCU in a 750-bed general hospital. A trained nurse performed a chart review and recorded the changes in 1) medical/nursing care, 2) help with decision-making within 48 hours after PCU admission, and 3) documentation of family and psycho-existential care. Group discussions among PCT and PCU staff members explored the potential reasons for the changes. Five patients were excluded due to admission periods of shorter than 48 hours. The number of new/modified medical and nursing care interventions after PCU admission averaged 1.9 ± 1.5 and 1.5 ± 1.3 per patient, respectively. The most common medical treatments were: reduction in hydration volume, dose titration of opioids, change in opioid administration device, opioid rotation, and addition of NSAIDs and steroids. The most common nursing interventions were: allowing patient to take a bath, changing mattress, use of massage, and discontinuation of bronchial suctioning. In addition, PCU staff newly coordinated opportunities to discuss preferred end-of-life care with primary caregivers in 38% of the cases, family members other than primary caregivers in 16%, and patients in 6.7%. The chart documentation of family care and psycho-existential care increased considerably after PCU admission. The chief reasons for these changes were: under-recognition of the problems and unavailability of treatments (pharmacological treatments), no intention to intervene and recommendations not followed by primary physicians (rehydration therapy), no intention to intervene (nursing care), and no intention to intervene and under-recognition of the problems (help with decision-making). These data demonstrate that many patients under PCT consultation receive new or modified interventions after PCU admission. Potentially useful strategies to strengthen the PCT interventions are: modification of intervention structure to minimize under-recognition of symptoms and decision making problems (e.g., use of standardized assessment tools, regular conferences), changes in the health care system to allow unlicensed drugs, clinical studies to clarify the benefits of artificial hydration therapy, and greater efforts to intervene in the areas of nursing care, help with decision making, family care, and psycho-existential care.     

Pain management services in palliative care: a national survey

INTRODUCTION: The effective management of pain requires a multidisciplinary approach. Previous studies have suggested that around 8% of cancer patients will require interventional techniques from an anaesthetist with special interest in pain management to maximize pain control, although this percentage may increase in the cohort of patients with difficult pain syndromes under the care of specialist palliative care services. We wished to determine the experiences and views of other palliative care physicians with regard to input from specialists in pain management. METHOD: A postal questionnaire was sent to the consultant members of the Association of Palliative Medicine. RESULTS: Most respondents had access to 'as-required' anaesthetist consultations with 72% of respondents feeling that the frequency of consultation was adequate. However, over half of the respondents had used the services of a pain management specialist less than four times in the past year and a quarter of respondents had not been involved in a joint consultation with an anaesthetist in the past year. All respondents felt that the pain management specialist's role included advice on technical procedures but less than 25% felt that their role should extend to advice on prescribing analgesics. DISCUSSION: There are likely to be several reasons for this apparent underutilization of specialist anaesthetist/pain management services. This survey has identified possible factors including lack of formal arrangements, lack of suitable experience and the attitudes of palliative medicine consultants.     

Frequency and perceived competence in providing palliative care to terminally ill patients: a survey of primary care physicians

We surveyed primary care physicians about their involvement and perceived skills in palliative care. A survey instrument asked how frequently internal medicine and family practice physicians performed 10 palliative care items. Subjects rated their skills in each area. A majority of physicians always or frequently performed all 10 palliative care items, but fewer than 50% of respondents adequately attended to the spiritual needs and economic problems of patients. Interest in palliative care was associated with an increased frequency in performing palliative care items (P = 0.036), while training in palliative care was associated with better perceived performance (P = 0.05). Only 36% of respondents had received training in palliative care. Internists and family practitioners provide palliative care to patients, but feel their skills are lacking in certain areas. Training may improve care to patients at the end of life.     

Challenges that specialist palliative care nurses encounter when caring for patients with advanced dementia

Specialist palliative care (SPC) has expanded recently in Ireland to incorporate diseases other than cancer, including dementia. Two care areas that pose specific challenges for SPC nurses when caring for people with advanced dementia are pain and nutrition/hydration. Assessment and management of pain for a patient who has advanced dementia differs greatly from that for a typical palliative care patient. Similarly, nutrition and hydration pose extraordinary ethical and practical dilemmas not encountered when caring for a patient without dementia. This paper reports a literature review which revealed that although evidence-based information related to each of these areas is available, it tends to be written from the perspective of health professionals with an interest in dementia rather than from the perspective of the SPC nurse. SPC nurses require evidence-based palliative care research to guide their practice, but such research appears to be limited for patients with advanced dementia. Knowledge from specialists in both dementia care and palliative care needs to be combined if we are to provide these patients with the best possible end-of-life care. Further research is required and evidenced-based guidelines need to be formulated.     

Palliative sedation to relieve psycho-existential suffering of terminally ill cancer patients

To clarify the prevalence and the characteristics of patients who received palliative sedation therapy for psycho-existential suffering, a questionnaire was sent to 105 responsible physicians at all certified palliative care units in Japan. The participants were requested to report the number of patients who received continuous deep sedation for refractory psycho-existential suffering during the past year, and to provide details of the 2 most recent patients. A total of 81 physicians returned questionnaires (response rate, 80%). Twenty-nine physicians (36%) reported clinical experience in continuous deep sedation for psycho-existential suffering. The overall prevalence of continuous deep sedation was calculated as 1.0% (90 cases/8,661 total patient deaths), and a total of 46 patient histories were collected. Performance status just before sedation was 3 or 4 in 96%, and predicted survival was 3 weeks or less in 94%. The suffering requiring sedation was feeling of meaninglessness/worthlessness (61%), burden on others/dependency/inability to take care of oneself (48%), death anxiety/fear/panic (33%), wish to control the time of death by oneself (24%), and isolation/lack of social support (22%). Before sedation, intermittent sedation and specialized psychiatric, psychological, and/or religious care had been performed in 94% and 59%, respectively; 89% of 26 depressed patients had received antidepressant medications. All competent patients (n=37) expressed explicit requests for sedation, and family consent was obtained in all cases where family members were available (n=45). Palliative sedation for psycho-existential suffering was performed in exceptional cases in specialized palliative care units in Japan. The patient condition was generally very poor, and the suffering was refractory to intermittent sedation and specialized psychiatric, psychological, and/or religious care. Sedation was performed on the basis of patient and family consent. These findings suggest that palliative sedation for psycho-existential suffering could be ethically permissible in exceptional cases if the proportionality and autonomy principle is applied. More discussion about the role of palliative sedation therapy for refractory psycho-existential suffering in end-of-life care is urgently necessary.     

Family satisfaction with inpatient palliative care in Japan

Whereas satisfaction is one of the most important outcomes in palliative care settings, there have been no systematic studies investigating the effects of family- and organization-related variables on family satisfaction with care. To clarify factors contributing to family satisfaction with inpatient palliative care services, a cross-sectional mailed survey was performed. A 60-item questionnaire was mailed to 1026 bereaved subjects who had lost family members at one of 37 palliative care units in Japan to evaluate their sociodemographic characteristics and satisfaction levels with care. An institution survey was performed to collect organization-related variables. Caregiver satisfaction was rated on the Satisfaction scale for Family members receiving Inpatient Palliative Care (Sat-Fam-IPC). A total of 640 responses were analysed (response rate = 62%). The responses to overall satisfaction were 'satisfied' in 41 % and 'very satisfied' in 47%. The mean total score of the Sat-Fam-IPC was 82.4 +/- 13.2 on the 0-100 scale. The mean subscale scores were: 85.8 +/- 14.5 (Nursing Care), 81.5 +/- 18.4 (Symptom Palliation), 85.0 +/- 13.8 (Facility), 83.3 +/- 16.6 (Information), 83.1 +/- 17.3 (Availability), 78.3 +/- 18.9 (Family Care), and 79.8 +/- 17.3 (Cost). Significant determinants of family satisfaction identified were: nursing system, the number of nurses at night and presence of attending medical social workers (Nursing Care), patient age and the number of physicians (Symptom Palliation), floor space per bed (Facility), duration of admission and presence of attending medical social workers (Availability), patient age, family age, gender and occupational status (Family Care), patient age and the extra charge for a private room (Cost). In conclusion, informal caregivers are generally satisfied with inpatient palliative care services provided by members of the Japanese Association of Hospice and Palliative Care Units. The levels of satisfaction are influenced by various family- and organization-related variables.     

Survey of specialist palliative care services for noncancer patients in Ireland and perceived barriers

BACKGROUND: Specialist palliative care (SPC) services in Ireland are well developed by international standards. However, standardized information on all patients of SPC services is not collected so the proportion of patients seen with a noncancer diagnosis is just an estimate at 5%. AIMS: To describe Irish SPC services' provision for, and attitudes to noncancer patients. METHOD: Postal questionnaire of clinical managers of all SPC services listed in the directory of SPC services in Ireland, September 2005. RESULTS: Sixty-five questionnaires were returned representing a 100% response rate. Twenty four percent (n = 15) of services limited availability for noncancer patients in some way. Of those services available for noncancer patients, the type of care provided to them was the same as for cancer patients in 81% of services (n = 50). The percentage of all patients seen in 2004 who had a noncancer diagnosis was 7.21%. Only 68% (n = 42) of services had a written referral policy. The top three perceived barriers by SPC service providers were the unpredictable noncancer disease trajectory (mean intensity = 6.77), the resultant difficulties with developing referral criteria (mean intensity = 6.38) and the lack of noncancer disease specific expertise (mean intensity = 5.96). DISCUSSION: There is a mismatch between availability of palliative care services for noncancer patients and uptake. The noncancer disease trajectory continues to be considered a barrier to care. Imaginative models of care need to be developed that are not prognosis based.     

End-of-life care for the critically ill: A national intensive care unit survey

OBJECTIVE: One in five Americans dies following treatment in an intensive care unit (ICU), and evidence indicates the need to improve end-of-life care for ICU patients. We conducted this study to elicit the views and experiences of ICU directors regarding barriers to optimal end-of-life care and to identify the type, availability, and perceived benefit of specific strategies that may improve this care. DESIGN: Self-administered mail survey. SETTING: Six hundred intensive care units. PARTICIPANTS: A random, nationally representative sample of nursing and physician directors of 600 adult ICUs in the United States. INTERVENTIONS: Mail survey. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We asked participants about barriers to end-of-life care (1 = huge to 5 = not at all a barrier), perceived benefit of strategies to improve end-of-life care, and availability of these strategies. From 468 ICUs (78.0% of sample), 590 ICU directors participated (406 nurses [65.1% response] and 184 physicians [31.7% response]). Respondents had a mean of 16.6 yrs (sd 7.6 yrs) of ICU experience. Important barriers to better end-of-life care included patient/family factors, including unrealistic patient/family expectations 2.5 (1.0), inability of patients to participate in discussions 2.7 (0.9), and lack of advance directives 2.9 (1.0); clinician factors, which included insufficient physician training in communication 2.9 (1.1) and competing demands on physicians' time 3.0 (1.1); and institution/ICU factors, such as suboptimal space for family meetings 3.5 (1.2) and lack of a palliative care service 3.4 (1.2). More than 80% of respondents rated 14 of 14 strategies as likely to improve end-of-life care, including trainee role modeling by experienced clinicians, clinician training in communication and symptom management, regular meetings of senior clinicians with families, bereavement programs, and end-of-life care quality monitoring. However, few of these strategies were widely available. CONCLUSIONS: Intensive care unit directors perceive important barriers to optimal end-of-life care but also universally endorse many practical strategies for quality improvement.     

Does palliative care improve quality? A survey of bereaved family members

Palliative care is the interdisciplinary specialty that aims to relieve suffering and improve the quality of care for patients with serious illness and their families. Although palliative care programs are becoming increasingly prevalent in U.S. hospitals, the impact of hospital palliative care consultation programs on the quality of care received by family members is not well understood. We conducted prospective quantitative telephonic interviews of family members of patients who died at Mount Sinai Medical Center between April and December 2005 using the validated "After-Death Bereaved Family Member Interview," to assess quality of medical care at the end of life. Multivariable techniques were used to compare family satisfaction of palliative care patients vs. usual care patients controlling for age, race (white vs. nonwhite), diagnosis (cancer vs. noncancer), socioeconomic status (Medicaid vs. non-Medicaid), and functional status (number of dependent activities of daily living). One hundred ninety eligible subjects were contacted and successful interviews were completed with 149 (78.4%) family members (54 palliative care and 95 usual care patients). Palliative care showed benefit, with 65% of palliative care patients' family members reporting that their emotional or spiritual needs were met, as compared to 35% of usual care patients' family members (P=0.004). Sixty-seven percent of palliative care patients' family members reported confidence in one or more self-efficacy domains, as compared to 44% of usual care patients' family members (P=0.03). Our study shows that palliative care consultation is associated with improved satisfaction, with attention to family and enhanced self-efficacy. Palliative care offers a unique approach by integrating the needs of the family into the care of the patient.     

Symptom control and palliative care in Chile

As in other developed and developing countries, the most common chronic disorders affecting the Chilean population are cardiovascular disease, cancer, cirrhosis, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmo- nary disease and external injuries. Availability of oncology services is not extensive and there are no academic programs to adequately train practitioners in either palliative medicine or comprehensive palliative care for allied health professionals including nurses, psychologists and chaplains. Major efforts have been made to incorporate palliative care as an important health care focus in the last decade and in the development of effective policies for opioid availability. Chile now meets 84% of the 17 criteria outlined by the World Health Organization and the International Narcotics Control Board for opioid availability. Postgraduate medical education in symptom control, clinical use of opioids and end-of-life care remains relatively poor as judged by the results of a questionnaire administered to 158 resident physicians at the Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile. Improvements in symptom control and the development of palliative care in Chile will depend on the effective assessment of symptom control effectiveness and improved education and training of health professionals in clinical pharmacology, symptom control, clinical ethics, and end-of-life care.