A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing anterior decompression with fusion and posterior laminoplasty for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament

BackgroundThe optimal surgical procedure for the treatment of cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) remains controversial because there are few comprehensive studies investigating the surgical methods. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate evidence in the literature and compare the surgical outcomes of anterior decompression with fusion (ADF) and laminoplasty (LAMP), which are representative procedures for cervical OPLL.MethodsAn extensive literature search was performed using PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library to identify comparative studies of ADF and LAMP for cervical OPLL. The language was restricted to English, and the year of publication was from January 1980 to December 2018. We extracted outcomes from the studies, such as preoperative and postoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, cervical alignment, surgical complications and reoperation rate. Then, meta-analysis was performed for these surgical outcomes.ResultsTwelve studies were obtained, including 1 prospective cohort study and 11 retrospective cohort studies. In the meta-analysis, neurological recovery rate in JOA score was greater in ADF than in LAMP, especially in patients with a large canal occupying ratio (≥60%) and preoperative kyphotic alignment. ADF also exhibited more favorable results in postoperative cervical alignment. In contrast, operating time and intraoperative blood loss were greater in ADF. Surgical complications were more frequently seen in ADF, leading to higher rates of reoperation.ConclusionsThis systematic review and meta-analysis showed both the merits and shortcomings of ADF and LAMP. ADF resulted in more favorable neurological recovery compared to LAMP, especially for patients with massive OPLL and kyphotic alignment. Postoperative cervical lordosis was also better preserved in ADF. However, ADF was associated with greater surgical invasion and higher incidences of surgical complications.     

A comparative study of surgical outcomes between anterior cervical discectomy with fusion and selective laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy

BackgroundFew studies have directly compared anterior and posterior surgical approaches in cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) patients with short-segment disease. We aimed to examine and compare surgical outcomes of anterior cervical discectomy with fusion (ACDF) and selective laminoplasty (S-LAMP) in CSM patients with 1- or 2-level disease.MethodsForty-six patients, who received surgeries for CSM, were prospectively investigated; 24 underwent ACDF and 22 underwent S-LAMP. Average follow-up was 3.5 years. The following pre- and postoperative radiographic measurements were recorded: (1) C2-7 angle, (2) local angle (lordotic Cobb angle at operative level), (3) cervical sagittal vertical axis (SVA) (center of gravity of the head-C7 SVA), and (4) C7 slope. Outcomes were evaluated using the Japanese Orthopedic Association scoring system for cervical myelopathy (C-JOA score), neck pain visual analog scale, and neck disability index (NDI).ResultsThere were no significant differences in patient demographics between the two groups. Postoperatively, C2-7 angle, local angle, cervical SVA, C7 slope, C-JOA score, and neck pain and NDI scores were not significantly different between the two groups; however, the recovery rate of the C-JOA score was superior in the ACDF group (57.5%) compared to the S-LAMP group (42.1%). The recovery rate of the C-JOA score in the local lordosis subgroup (local angle ≥ 0°) showed no significant difference between the two surgical groups. However, in the local kyphosis subgroup (local angle < 0°), C-JOA score recovery rate was worse after S-LAMP (20.4%) than ACDF (57.9%); local angle also worsened postoperatively after S-LAMP.ConclusionsIn patients with local lordosis at the segments of cervical spondylosis and spinal cord compression, S-LAMP showed equivalent surgical outcomes (neurological recovery, neck pain and NDI scores, and cervical alignment) to ACDF. However, in patients with local kyphosis, S-LAMP worsened the kyphosis and resulted in worse neurological recovery.     

Is anterior decompression and fusion superior to laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy due to ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Context: Considerable controversy exists over surgical procedures for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL).Objective: The purpose of the meta-analysis was to compare the clinical outcome of anterior decompression and fusion (ADF) with laminoplasty (LAMP) in treatment of cervical myelopathy due to OPLL.Methods: PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials database were searched to identify potential clinical studies compared ADF with LAMP for cervical myelopathy owing to OPLL. We also manually searched the reference lists of articles and reviews for possible relevant studies. Thirteen studies with 1120 patients were included in our analysis. Subgroup analyses were performed by the canal occupying ratio of OPLL.Results: Overall, the mean preoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score was similar between two groups. Compared with LAMP group, ADF group was higher at the mean postoperative JOA scores and mean recovery rate, reoperation rate, and longer at mean operation time. There was not significantly different in mean blood loss and complication rate between two groups. In subgroup analysis, ADF had a higher mean postoperative JOA score and recovery rate than LAMP in cases of OPLL with occupying ratios ≥ 50%, while those difference were not found in cases of OPLL with occupying ratios < 50%.Conclusion: ADF achieves better neurological improvement compared with LAMP in treatment of cervical myelopathy due to OPLL, especially in cases of OPLL with occupying ratios ≥ 50%. Complication rate is similar between two groups, but ADF can increase the risk of reoperation     

The relationship between preoperative cervical sagittal balance and clinical outcome of laminoplasty treated cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament patients

Background contextLaminoplasty is a common surgical method used to treat patients with cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). Although laminoplasty is preferred over traditional laminectomy, the factors affecting the complications and outcomes are unclear. Recently, sagittal balance indexes have been revealed to be predictors of clinical outcomes in patients with cervical degenerative diseases, but their relationships with laminoplasty-treated OPLL outcomes remains unknown.PurposeThe purpose of this study is to evaluate the relationship of preoperative cervical sagittal balance indexes and clinical outcome in laminoplasty treated OPLL patients.Study designThis is a retrospective case study.Patient populationBetween January 2015 and January 2017, 181 consecutively included patients who underwent cervical laminoplasty for OPLL were enrolled (male:female ratio=126:75; mean age=60.2 years). Cervical spine lateral radiographs in neutral, flexion, and extension positions were taken before and 2 years after the surgery.Outcome measuresThe C2–C7 Cobb angle, T1 slope, C1–C7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA), C2–C7 SVA, CGH (center of gravity of the head)-C7 SVA, cervical JOA (Japanese Orthopedic Association) score, and neck VAS (visual analogue scale) score were measured preoperatively and postoperatively at the 2-year follow-up.MethodsThe patients were divided into two groups according to changes in the lordotic angle or the recovery rate of the JOA score. The relationships between the postoperative lordosis loss or the clinical outcome and the preoperative variables, including the patient's age, JOA score, C2-C7 Cobb angle, T1 slope, C1-C7 SVA, C2-C7 SVA, and CGH-C7 SVA, were investigated.ResultsThe patients were divided into two groups according to the postoperative change in the C2-C7 Cobb angle. There were no differences in the age, preoperative C2-C7 Cobb angle, C1-C7 SVA, or C2-C7 SVA; there was only a difference in the preoperative CGH-C7 SVA and T1 slope level (p=.038, p=.042). The postoperative JOA and JOA recovery rate were related to the postoperative lordosis loss in cervical alignment (p=.048, p=.031). We again divided the patients into two groups according to the JOA recovery rate and found that only the preoperative CGH-C7 SVA and C1–C7 SVA were related to the neurological outcome (p=.011, p=.047). According to the multivariate logistic regression analysis, higher preoperative CGH-C7 SVA levels were significantly associated with decreases in the lordosis angle postoperatively and the clinical outcome (p=.018, OR=1.225; p=.034, OR=1.654). The ROC (receiver operating characteristic) analysis revealed that the proper cutoff value of preoperative CGH-C7 SVA for predicting the postoperative loss of lordosis and clinical outcomes is 3.8 cm.ConclusionPreoperative cervical sagittal balance indexes are related to the outcomes of OPLL patients after laminoplasty. Patients with high preoperative CGH-C7 SVA levels have a high probability of developing sagittal imbalances and neurological symptoms of the cervical spine, and this measurement can be used as a predictor of outcomes in laminoplasty-treated cervical OPLL patients.     

Significance of segmental instability in cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament and treated by a posterior hybrid technique

Study design

Retrospective cohort case study.

Objective

To evaluate significance of segmental instability (SI) in cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) myelopathy and effectiveness of a posterior hybrid technique in the treatment of OPLL associated with SI.

Summary and background data

Some studies suggested both static and dynamic compression factors accounted for the pathogenesis of myelopathy in the OPLL patients.

Method

Between May 2005 and August 2007, 15 patients with multilevel cervical OPLL, diagnosed to be associated with SI, were treated by a posterior hybrid technique including laminoplasty and fusion at instable levels with lateral mass screw fixation. Another 15 cohort patients without SI treated by laminoplasty in the same period were included in the control group. Radiological and clinical data were compared between two groups.

Results

There were no significant differences in Preop. lordotic angle, extent of OPLL, type of OPLL and occupying rate, but more patients tended to present high-intensity zone (HIZ) on MRI in the group with SI. In 15 patients with SI, 17 intervertebral levels had SI, which were distributed at the noncontinuous levels of mixed-type OPLL or the adjacent levels of continuous-type OPLL. They were also consistent with the presence of HIZ levels in the major of patients. After operation, the lordotic angle was maintained well by the posterior hybrid technique in the OPLL with SI group, and was significantly greater than that in the OPLL without SI at the 3- and 4-year follow-up point. Postoperative kyphotic change of the cervical spine and postoperative progression of the ossified lesion were not observed in the OPLL with SI group, but they were respectively observed in four cases (26.7 %) and two cases (13.3 %) in the OPLL without SI group at the 4-year follow-up point. The preoperative C-JOA score in the OPLL with SI group was lower than that in the OPLL without SI group. The average C-JOA score and improvement rate were comparable in the first 2 years after operation between two groups, but there was a decrease in C-JOA score and improvement rate in the following 2 years in the OPLL without SI group. At the 3- and 4-year follow-up points, both postoperative C-JOA score improvement rate in the OPLL with SI group were superior to those in the OPLL without SI group. Each group had one case developing C5 palsy, but three cases in the OPLL without SI group developed late neurological deterioration due to postoperative kyphotic change or progression of the ossified lesion.

Conclusions

Segmental instability, a degenerative dynamic factor, is important to the OPLL myelopathy. The posterior hybrid technique seemed to be effective and safe in the treatment of selective OPLL patients associated with SI. The benefits may include providing stabilization environment for spinal cord recovery, and preventing progressive kyphotic change and progression of OPLL.     

Comparison of anterior decompression with fusion and posterior decompression with fusion for cervical spondylotic myelopathy—A systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundThe optimal surgical procedure for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) remains controversial. Recently, laminectomy/laminoplasty with instrumented fusion (LAMF) has been increasingly applied to treat CSM. However, few comprehensive studies have compared anterior decompression with fusion (ADF) and LAMF. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the evidence in the literature and to compare the surgical outcomes between the 2 procedures. Since the surgical outcomes and risks differ between patients with CSM and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) and between only posterior decompression and decompression with fusion treatments, we excluded patients with OPLL and patients with only posterior decompression in this review.MethodsAn extensive literature search was performed using PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library to identify comparative studies of ADF and LAMF for the treatment of CSM. The language was restricted to English, and the publication period was from January 2001 to July 2019. We only included studies about CSM and excluded studies that involved patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament and with the treatment of posterior decompression without fusion. We extracted outcomes from the studies, such as preoperative and postoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores, neck disability index (NDI) scores, cervical alignment data, and surgical complications. Then, a meta-analysis was performed on these surgical outcomes.ResultsEleven studies were obtained, and the quality of the studies was acceptable. In the meta-analysis, the pre- and postoperative JOA scores were similar between the ADF and LAMF groups. The ADF group exhibited more favorable results than the LAMF group in terms of postoperative cervical alignment and the NDI. Overall complications were similar between the ADF and LAMF groups; however, C5 palsy was more frequently observed in the LAMF group than in the ADF group.ConclusionsWhile the ADF and LAMF groups demonstrated similar results in terms of neurological recovery, postoperative cervical lordosis and NDI scores were more favorable with ADF than with LAMF. The overall complication rate was similar between the ADF and LAMF groups. Surgeons should understand the merits and shortcomings of both procedures when deciding on a surgical procedure.     

Evaluation of cervical sagittal parameters on supine magnetic resonance imaging in patients with Chiari I malformation without syringomyelia

ObjectiveThe current study aimed to assess the effects of tonsillar herniation on cervical alignment in Chiari I patients without syringomyelia using new cervical sagittal alignment parameters, such as C0–2 Cobb angle, C2–7 cobb angle, T1 slope, and C2–7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA).MethodsTwo spinal surgeons independently evaluated midline T2-weighted sagittal magnetic resonance imaging findings of 28 Chiari I patients without syringomyelia and 40 patients without tonsillar herniation but with similar complaints. Thereafter, the measured C0–2 Cobb angle, C2–7 Cobb angle T1 slope, and C2–7 SVA were compared using the t-test.ResultsDifferences in the mean values for C2–7 Cobb angle, T1 slope, and C2–7 SVA were found between Chiari I patients and those without tonsillar herniation.ConclusionThe current study showed that Chiari I patients were less lordotic (kyphotic) compared to subjects without tonsillar herniation.     

Differences in cervical sagittal alignment between the standing and sitting positions

BackgroundSagittal spinal alignment has mainly analyzed in the standing position. According to previous studies, there are significant differences in lumbopelvic alignment between the standing and sitting positions and cervical alignment is affected by lumbopelvic alignment. In this study, therefore, we hypothesized that cervical sagittal alignments are different between the standing and sitting positions.MethodsA total of 108 patients with spinal degenerative diseases underwent whole spine radiography. Cervical lordosis (CL), C2-7 SVA, T1S, C7–S1 SVA, TK, LL, SS, PT, and PI were measured in the standing and sitting positions. Patients were classified into 3 groups according to the changes in CL (ΔCL, CL in the sitting position − CL in the standing position); ΔCL < −3° (Decreased group: DG; 28.7%), −3° ≤ ΔCL ≤ 3° (Unchanged group: UG; 41.7%), and ΔCL > 3° (Increased group: IG; 29.6%).ResultsThe parameters of the UG in the standing position were closer to the ideal alignment (SRS-Schwab classification). In the DG, CL, T1S, and C7–S1 SVA in the standing position were significantly higher than in the UG. In the IG, PI-LL in the standing position was significantly higher than in the UG. In the sitting position, pelvis was rotated posteriorly (decrease in SS and increase in PT) and lumbar lordosis was flattened (decrease in LL) in all groups, and C2-7 SVA was significantly higher in the DG than in the UG.ConclusionsCL was different between the standing and sitting positions in 58.3% of individuals. However, patients with good spinal sagittal alignment appeared to not undergo any changes in cervical alignment. Our results suggest the possibility that patients who had a positive imbalance and large PI-LL mismatch in the standing position had decreased CL and increased CL, respectively, when in the sitting position.     

Analysis of the impact of spinopelvic radiographic parameters on the severity of cervical spondylotic myelopathy

BackgroundThe correlation between spinal radiographic parameters and severity of cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) is controversial. This study aimed to investigate the associations between spinal radiographic parameters and CSM severity, as well as between cervical and other spinopelvic radiographic parameters.MethodsPatients diagnosed with CSM (N = 118; 77 men) at our hospital from March 2013 to February 2017 were included. The patients’ demographic data and the following radiographic parameters were investigated: cervical lordosis (CL), C2–C7 sagittal vertical axis (C2–C7 SVA), T1 slope, thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, pelvic incidence, sacral slope, pelvic tilt, and sagittal vertical axis (SVA). Cervical cord compression ratio (CCCR) was evaluated on sagittal magnetic resonance imaging. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scoring system was used for clinical evaluation. Correlation analyses were performed among the clinical and radiographic parameters.ResultsThe JOA score had the strongest correlation with SVA (r = −0.46, p < 0.01), followed by CCCR (r = −0.33, p < 0.01), CL (r = −0.29, p < 0.01), T1 slope (r = −0.29, p = 0.01), and C2–C7 SVA (r = −0.20, p = 0.03). Multivariate linear regression analysis revealed a model predicting the JOA score; JOA = 13.6 − 0.24 × SVA − 4.2 × CCCR (r = 0.51, p < 0.01). Although there was no significant correlation between the cervical and lumbopelvic radiographic parameters, the sequential correlation among the investigated spinopelvic parameters was identified.ConclusionsCSM severity worsened with spinal malalignment, such as a larger SVA. Though lumbopelvic radiographic parameters did not significantly impact cervical alignment and CSM severity, the sequential correlations among cervical-thoracic-lumbopelvic radiographic parameters were observed. Therefore, SVA is the most relevant radiographic parameter for CSM, but we cannot preclude the possibility that lumbopelvic alignment also affects cervical alignment and CSM severity.     

Long-term follow-up results of anterior interbody fusion applied for cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament

STUDY DESIGN: A long-term follow-up study was carried out in 30 patients who underwent anterior interbody fusion for cervical myelopathy associated with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether anterior interbody fusion without decompression is an appropriate surgical method for long-term relief of cervical OPLL myelopathy. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Several studies of operative results after posterior decompression for cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament have been reported. There has been no report about anterior interbody fusion without decompression. The postoperative results of this treatment method applied in cervical OPLL myelopathy have been evaluated by the authors of the present study for more than 10 years. No reports on such a long-term follow-up study have been published in the literature. METHODS: Thirty patients who underwent anterior interbody fusion for cervical OPLL myelopathy were evaluated clinically and radiographically. The mean follow-up period was 14.7 years (range, 10-23 years). RESULTS: Clinical results were evaluated according to Okamoto's classification. At the time of the final follow-up evaluation, 16 patients had improved in functional score by two grades, and their surgical results were regarded as excellent; eight patients improved by one grade, and their clinical outcomes were regarded as good; five patients showed no change; and the condition of one patient deteriorated. As for radiographic analysis, the type of ossification had changed in four cases. Ossification width and thickness increased in 26 patients. Postoperative alignment of the cervical spine showed kyphosis in three patients, straight spine in 11 patients, and lordosis in 16 patients. CONCLUSION: Anterior interbody fusion without decompression is an effective treatment for cervical OPLL myelopathy that resulted in stable long-lasting conditions.     

Perioperative complications of anterior cervical decompression with fusion in patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: a retrospective, multi-institutional study

BackgroundAnterior decompression with fusion (ADF) for patients with cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) is reportedly associated with a higher incidence of complications than is laminoplasty. However, the frequency of perioperative complications associated with ADF for cervical OPLL has not been fully established. The purpose of this study was to investigate the incidence of perioperative complications, especially neurological complications, following ADF performed to relieve compressive cervical myelopathy due to cervical OPLL.MethodsStudy participants comprised 150 patients who had undergone ADF for cervical OPLL at 27 institutions between 2005 and 2008. Perioperative—especially neurological—complications occurring within 2 weeks after ADF were analyzed. Preoperative imaging findings, including Cobb angle, between C2 and C7 and occupying ratio of OPLL were investigated. Multivariate analysis with logistic regression was performed to identify independent risk factors for neurological complications.ResultThree patients (2.0 %) showed deterioration of lower-extremity function after ADF. One of the three patients had not regained their preoperative level of function 6 months after surgery. Upper-extremity paresis occurred in 20 patients (13.3 %), five of whom had not returned to preoperative levels 6 months after surgery. Patients with upper-extremity paresis showed significantly higher occupying ratios of OPLL, greater blood loss, longer operation times, fusion of more segments, and higher rates of cerebrospinal fluid leakage than those without paresis. Independent risk factors for upper-extremity paresis were a high occupying ratio of OPLL and large blood loss during surgery.ConclusionsThe incidences of deterioration in upper- and lower-extremity functions were 13.3 % and 2.0 %, respectively. Patients with a high occupying ratio of OPLL are at higher risk of developing neurological deterioration.     

A novel anterior decompression technique (vertebral body sliding osteotomy) for ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine

Background Context

Conventional anterior decompression surgery for cervical myelopathy, including anterior corpectomy and fusion, is technically demanding and is known to be associated with a higher incidence of surgery-related complications, including cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage, neurologic deterioration, and graft failure compared with posterior surgery.

Posterior decompression and fusion versus laminoplasty for cervical ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Neurosurgical Review - Both posterior decompression and fusion (PDF) and laminoplasty (LAMP) have been used to treat cervical myelopathy due to multilevel ossification of posterior longitudinal...     

Characteristics affecting cervical sagittal alignment in patients with chronic low back pain

BackgroundSagittal spino-pelvic malalignment in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) have been reported in the past, which may also affect cervical spine lesions. The purpose of this study is to investigate the cervical alignment in patients with CLBP.MethodOf the patients who visited an orthopedic specialist due to low back pain lasting more than three months, 121 cases (average 71.5-years-old, 46 male and 75 female) with whole standing spinal screening radiographs were reviewed (CLBP group). Cervical parameters included cervical lordosis (CL), C2–C7 sagittal vertical axis (C2-7 SVA), and the T1 slope minus CL (T1S-CL). Cervical spine deformity was defined as C2-7 SVA >4 cm, CL <0°, or T1S-CL ≧20°. We compared the cervical alignment of these patients with 121 age and gender matched volunteers (control group).ResultsThe prevalence of cervical spine deformity was significantly higher in the CLBP group than in the control group (20.7% vs. 10.7%, P = 0.034). The mean CL was smaller in the CLBP group than in the control group (16.1° vs. 21.4°, P = 0.002). The mean C2-7 SVA was 17.6 mm vs. 18.7 mm in the CLBP group and in the control group, respectively (P = 0.817). The mean T1S-CL was larger in the CLBP group than in the control group (9.1° vs. 3.5°, P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that people with CLBP were more likely to have cervical deformities than people without CLBP (odds ratio 2.16, 95% confidence interval 1.006 to 4.637).ConclusionsThis study results suggest that people with CLBP present with worse cervical sagittal alignment and higher prevalence of cervical spine deformities than age and gender matched volunteers with no CLBP. This means CLBP impacts cervical spine lesions negatively.Level of evidenceⅣ     

Long-term results of a prospective study of anterior decompression with fusion and posterior decompression with laminoplasty for treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy

Background

There have been no prospective studies comparing anterior surgery and posterior method in terms of long-term outcomes. The purposes of this study is to clarify whether there is any difference in long-term clinical and radiologic outcomes of anterior decompression with fusion (ADF) and laminoplasty (LAMP) for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM).

Intraoperative alignment goals for distinctive sagittal morphotypes of severe cervical deformity to achieve optimal improvements in health-related quality of life measures

Background ContextPatients with severe cervical deformity (CD) often have profound deficits in numerous activities of daily living. The association between health status and postoperative radiographic goals is difficult to quantify.PurposeWe aimed to investigate the radiographic characteristics of patients who achieved optimal health related quality of life scores following surgery for CD.Study DesignWe performed a retrospective review of a prospectively collected database of patients with spinal deformity.Patient SampleOne hundred and fifty-three patients with cervical deformityOutcome MeasuresCommon health-related quality of life scores (HRQOLs) measurements were taken for patients treated operatively for cervical deformity including neck disability index (NDI), modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association scale (mJOA) for myelopathy and numeric rating scale for neck pain (NRS-neck),MethodsSurgical patients with severe CD were isolated based upon a previously presented discriminant analysis which outlined a combination of preoperative cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA), T1 slope, maximum focal kyphosis in extension, C2 slope in extension, and number of kyphotic levels in extension. Those with available preoperative and 1-year postoperative HRQL data were included. Based on a previous study, patients were grouped into three distinct sagittal morphotypes of CD: focal deformity (FD), flat neck (FN = large TS-CL and lack of compensation), or cervicothoracic (CT). Postoperative outcomes were defined as “good” if a patient had ≥2 of the three following criteria (1) NDI <20 or meeting MCID, (2) mild myelopathy (mJOA≥14), and (3) NRS-Neck ≤5 or improved by ≥2 points from baseline. Within each distinct deformity group, patients with good outcomes were compared to those with poor outcomes (ie, not meeting the criteria for good) for differences in demographics, HRQOL scores, and alignment, via Chi-squared or student's t tests.ResultsOverall, 83 of 153 patients met the criteria of severe CD and 40 patients had complete 1-year follow-up of clinical/radiographic data. Patient breakdown by deformity pattern was: CT (N=13), FN (N=17), and FD (N=17), with 7 patients meeting criteria for both FD and FN deformities. Within the FD cohort, maximal focal kyphosis (ie, kyphosis at one level) was better corrected in patients with a “good” outcome (p=.03). In the FN cohort, patients with “good” outcomes presented preoperatively with worse horizontal gaze (McGregor Slope 21° vs. 6°, p=.061) and cSVA (72 mm vs. 60 mm, p=.030). “Good” outcome FN patients showed significantly greater postop correction of horizontal gaze (-25° vs. -5°, p=.031). In the CT cohort, patients with “good” outcomes had superior global alignment both pre- (SVA: -17 mm vs. 108 mm, p<.001) and postoperatively (50 mm vs. 145 mm, p=.001). CT patients with “good” outcomes also had better postop cervical alignment (cSVA 35 mm vs. 49 mm, p=.030), and less kyphotic segments during extension (p=.011). In the FD cohort, there were no differences between “good” and “poor” outcomes patients in preoperative alignment; however, “good” outcome patients showed superior changes in postoperative focal kyphosis (−2° vs. 5°, p=.030). Within all three deformity pattern categories, there were no differences between “good” and “poor” outcome patients with respect to demographics or surgical parameters (levels fused, surgical approach, decompression, osteotomy, all p>.050).ConclusionsThe results of this study show each CD patient's unique deformity must be carefully examined in order to determine the appropriate alignment goals to achieve optimal HRQOLs. In particular, the recognition of the sagittal morphotype can help assist surgeons to aim for specific alignment goals for CT, FN and FD. Distinct deformity specific intra-operative goals include obtaining proper sagittal global/cervical alignment for cervicothoracic patients, correcting maximal focal kyphosis in focal deformity patients, and correcting horizontal gaze for flatneck patients.     

Anterior corpectomy versus posterior laminoplasty for multilevel cervical myelopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Surgical strategy for multilevel cervical myelopathy resulting from cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) or ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) still remains controversial. There are still questions about the relative benefit and safety of direct decompression by anterior corpectomy (CORP) versus indirect decompression by posterior laminoplasty (LAMP).

Objective

To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the results of anterior CORP compared with posterior LAMP for patients with multilevel cervical myelopathy.

Methods

Systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies comparing anterior CORP with posterior LAMP for the treatment of multilevel cervical myelopathy due to CSM or OPLL from 1990 to December 2012. An extensive search of literature was performed in Pubmed, Embase, and the Cochrane library. The quality of the studies was assessed according to GRADE. The following outcome measures were extracted: pre- and postoperative Japanese orthopedic association (JOA) score, neurological recovery rate (RR), surgical complications, reoperation rate, operation time and blood loss. Two reviewers independently assessed each study for quality and extracted data. Subgroup analysis was conducted according to the mean number of surgical segments.

Results

A total of 12 studies were included in this review, all of which were prospective or retrospective cohort studies with relatively low quality. The results indicated that the mean JOA score system for cervical myelopathy and the neurological RR in the CORP group were superior to those in the LAMP group when the mean surgical segments were <3, but were similar between the two groups in the case of the mean surgical segments equal to 3 or more. There was no statistical difference in the surgical complication rate between the two groups when the mean surgical segments <3, but were significantly higher incidences of surgical complications and complication-related reoperation in the CORP group compared with the LAMP group in the case of the mean surgical segments equal to 3 or more. Besides, the operation time in the CORP group was longer than that in the LAMP group, and the average blood loss was significantly more in the CORP group compared with the LAMP group.

Conclusion

Based on the results above, anterior CORP and fusion is recommended for the treatment of multilevel cervical myelopathy when the involved surgical segments were <3. Given the higher rates of surgical complications and complication-related reoperation and the higher surgical trauma associated with multilevel CORP, however, it is suggested that posterior LAMP may be the preferred method of treatment for multilevel cervical myelopathy when the involved surgical segments were equal to 3 or more. In addition, taking the limitations of this study into consideration, it was still not appropriate to draw a strong conclusion claiming superiority for CORP or LAMP. A well-designed, prospective, randomized controlled trial is necessary to provide objective data on the clinical results of both procedures.     

Is cervical lordosis relevant in laminoplasty?

Background contextLaminoplasty aims to decompress the spinal cord and stabilize the cervical spine in patients with multilevel cervical lesions. Not every patient with cervical compressive myelopathy is a good candidate for laminoplasty. Most studies recommend that neutral or kyphotic alignments are contraindications for laminoplasty. However, cervical sagittal alignment does not have a strong and consistent effect on the clinical outcomes of laminoplasty. Moreover, many reports on the effect of cervical sagittal alignment did not designate the ideal definition of alignment and used different definitions of lordosis.PurposeTo identify the effect of preoperative cervical alignment according to two different definitions after midline splitting double-door laminoplasty.Study designRetrospective cohort study.Patient sampleFrom August 2008 to September 2010, 58 patients were diagnosed with cervical myelopathy and treated with midline splitting double-door laminoplasty.Outcome measuresThe clinical results were assessed with the modified Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, neck disability index (NDI), and visual analog scale (VAS) and were compared to analyze the rate of change between preoperative and postoperative values. Postoperative radiological results at the final follow-up examinations were compared between groups to obtain the change in range of motion and sagittal alignment.MethodThe effect of cervical alignment on JOA, NDI, and VAS scales and also on change of alignment and change of range of motion (ROM) at the final follow-up examinations was analyzed statistically between two groups according to two different definitions such as Toyama classification and Cobb angle.ResultsNo difference was found between the two groups according to Toyama classification in terms of the postoperative improvement rate of the modified JOA score (p=.086), decreasing rate of the VAS (p=.940) or NDI (p=.211), postoperatively. Additionally, no difference was found for the decreasing rate of ROM (p=.427) or sagittal alignment (p=.864) based on the radiological evaluation results. Also, there was no difference between two groups according to Cobb angle in terms of the modified JOA score (p=.743), VAS (p=.548), or NDI (p=.32), postoperatively. Additionally, no difference was found for the ROM (p=1.000) or sagittal alignment (p=.440) based on the radiological evaluation results.ConclusionsDespite nonlordosis cervical sagittal alignment, double-door laminoplasty would be effective for patients with cervical myelopathy because of cervical spondylotic myelopathy or ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Furthermore, sagittal alignment is not the absolute and sole factor that surgeons should consider when determining the optimal treatment strategy.     

Evaluation of dynamic spinal alignment changes and compensation using three-dimensional gait motion analysis for dropped head syndrome

BACKGROUND CONTEXTDynamic kinematic evaluation of spino-pelvic alignment during gait using three-dimensional (3D) motion analysis has been proposed for adult spinal thoracolumbar deformity. That is because conventional full-spine radiographs cannot be used to evaluate dynamic factors. However, dynamic changes in spino-pelvic alignment during gait for dropped head syndrome (DHS) have not been studied using this approach.PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess the dynamic changes in spinal-pelvic alignment during gait in patients with DHS using 3D motion analysis.STUDY DESIGNRetrospective review of collected radiographic and kinematic data.PATIENT SAMPLENineteen DHS patients with neck pain and/or anterior gaze disturbance.OUTCOME MEASURESStatic spino-pelvic radiological alignment, dynamic spino-pelvic kinematic parameters and electromyogram (EMG) data.METHODSCenter of gravity of the head - C7 sagittal vertical axis (CGH-C7 SVA), C2-C7 SVA, T1 slope; cervical lordosis (CL), C7SVA, thoracic kyphosis (TK), lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic tilt (PT) and pelvic incidence (PI) were assessed using full-spine radiographs in a standing position to assess static spino-pelvic alignment. The 3D gait motion analysis was conducted during gait. Dynamic kinematic parameters were divided into spinal segments: cervical (C-), thoracic (T-), lumbar (L-) and pelvis (P-). Each spinal segment coronal angle to the pelvic angle, each spinal segment sagittal angle to the pelvic angle and pelvic sagittal angle to the horizontal axis were assessed as dynamic spino-pelvic kinematic parameters. Trunk and lower limb muscle activity during gait were assessed using wireless surface EMG analysis. Dynamic spino-pelvic kinematic variables and muscle activity were compared between the first walking lap and the final lap during gait analysis. The change in dynamic kinematic parameters was correlated with static radiological alignment and electromyographic muscular activity change.RESULTSCervical and thoracic anterior tilt increased significantly after an extended period of walking, indicating that dropped head worsened during gait. An increase of cervical anterior tilt during walking was significantly associated with decreased muscle activity in the cervical paraspinal muscles (r=-0.463, P<.05) and latissimus dorsi (r=-0.763, p<.01). Furthermore, significant correlations were found between a change in thoracic sagittal angle to pelvic angle and C7SVA (r=0.683, p<.01) and LL (r=-0.475, p<.05). This means that a larger C7SVA and smaller LL were associated with increased thoracic anterior tilt during gait.CONCLUSIONSThe 3D motion analysis for DHS showed that cervical and thoracic anterior tilt significantly increased after extended walking, resulting in worsening of dropped head. Decreased muscle activity of the neck extensor muscles during gait suggests insufficient neck extensor muscle endurance, which was associated with increased cervical anterior tilt. A greater increase in the thoracic anterior tilt during gait was found in DHS patients with a larger C7SVA and smaller LL due to insufficient thoracolumbar compensation for the dropped head. Correction of the cervical spine alone would not be sufficient to improve dropped head in cases with increased thoracic anterior tilt during gait. The results suggest that C7SVA and LL are crucial parameters in the surgical strategy for DHS.     

Anterior corpectomy and fusion to C2 for cervical myelopathy: clinical results and complications

Purpose

Anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF) to C2 (ACCF-C2) for multilevel lesions is a challenging procedure that is indicated for massive ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) extending to C2 or stenosis at the upper cervical region accompanied by kyphosis. However, there is little information on the effectiveness of and complications related to ACCF-C2. The purpose of this study was to investigate the overall surgical results and postoperative complications of ACCF-C2 for cervical myelopathy.

Methods

Sixteen patients who underwent ACCF-C2 for OPLL and cervical spondylotic myelopathy were evaluated. An iliac bone or a fibular strut was grafted using a cervical plate. The mean fusion level was 3.8, and the mean follow-up period was 36 months. Patients’ charts, clinical results assessed using the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scale, and radiographs were retrospectively reviewed.

Results

The average preoperative JOA score was 11.5 ± 3.5, and improved significantly to 13.1 ± 3.2 at 24 months after surgery (P < 0.01). The postoperative cervical alignment was significantly improved at the last follow-up (P < 0.05). Seven patients experienced complications, including neurological complications in three, graft-related complications in three, cerebrospinal fluid leakage in two, late retropharyngeal perforation in one, and dysphasia in one. Three of 16 patients experienced upper airway obstruction in this series, and 2 of 473 patients who underwent anterior cervical decompression and fusion at lower levels in the same period (P < 0.001).

Conclusions

ACCF-C2 is effective for massive OPLL and stenosis accompanied by kyphosis. To avoid complications, skilled decompression and bone grafting technique are necessary, and delayed extubation for upper airway obstruction is preferable.