Anti-embolism stocking care protocol to prevent associated skin problems: A quasi-experimental study

AimThe aim of this quasi-experimental study was to develop an anti-embolism stocking care protocol and assess its effectiveness in preventing associated skin problems on the legs.Materials and methodsThe study was conducted between 02 March and July 20, 2016 in the surgical clinics of a private university hospital in Ankara, Turkey. The sample consisted of 27 nurses and 162 patients (three different patients were fitted of anti-embolism stockings by each of the 27 nurses; pre-protocol 81 patients and post-protocol 81 patients). Data were collected using data collection forms developed by the researchers. An anti-embolism stocking care protocol was developed and used. Nurses and patients were evaluated using an observational method.ResultsFollowing implementation of the protocol, nurses’ mean knowledge (95.24 ± 5.60) and intervention skill (92.06 ± 10.42) scores were significantly higher than their pre-protocol knowledge (73.54 ± 14.26) and intervention skill (15.30 ± 6.84) scores. Nurses performed almost all steps of the care protocol correctly after the protocol was implemented. The rates of skin problems such as pressure ulcers, neurovascular problems and issues associated with wrinkles or creases in stockings were significantly reduced after implementation of the protocol.ConclusionsThis study demonstrates that nurses’ knowledge and intervention skills are increased when a care protocol is used, together with the prevention of errors and improved patient outcomes. The use of care protocols guides nurses in practice, raises awareness and helps to achieve nursing care objectives by standardizing information.     

Factors related to knowledge,attitude, and practice of nurses in intensive care unit in the area of pressure ulcer prevention: A multicenter study

IntroductionAs one of the main members of the health team, nurses have an important role in pressure ulcer prevention in health care centers. The aim of this study was to investigate knowledge, attitude, and practice of nurses on the prevention of pressure ulcers and their related factors.MethodsThis cross-sectional study was carried out in 2018. The total number of ICU nurses employed in educational-health centers affiliated to Iran University of Medical Sciences were examined. Among a total of 328 nurses, 308 questionnaires were completed by the participants. Pressure Ulcer Knowledge Questionnaire, Attitude Toward Pressure Ulcer, and Practice of Pressure Ulcer Prevention questionnaires were used to collect data. SPSS software version 16 and independent t-test, Chi-square, Fisher exact, one-way Analysis of variance, and multiple linear regressions tests were used for data analysis.FindingsBased on the mean score of knowledge, attitude, and practice of the nurses about the pressure ulcer prevention were 63.47 ± 10.31, 39.10 ± 40.22, and 32.03 ± 6.17, respectively. There was a positive and significant relationship between these three variables. Findings revealed that knowledge was increased by 0.051 units, with a one-year increase in work experience of nurses in the ICU. Moreover, women's knowledge and their attitude were higher than those of men as 3.132 and 1.65 units, respectively. Based on the findings, attitude of nurses increased by 0.43 units for an hour of extra work per week. Nurses' attitude score in the General ICU and their practice were higher than scores of other nurses as 2.144 and 2.574 units, respectively. Moreover, practice of nurses increased by 0.162 unit with one-year increase of their age.ConclusionGiven the undesirable level of knowledge and attitude and relatively desirable practice of nurses in the field of pressure ulcer prevention and the importance of improving the safety of patients admitted to the ICU, it is suggested that appropriate educational planning be developed to raise the level of knowledge, attitude, and practice of health care providers, especially nurses, in the area of pressure ulcer prevention.     

Nurses’ attitude on pressure injury prevention: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on the pressure ulcer prevention instrument (APuP)

BackgroundPrevention of pressure ulcers (PU) is one of the most important indicators of the quality of patient care that may be influenced by the attitude of nurses. Nurses are responsible for maintaining the integrity of the skin and preventing its complications. The aim of this study was to assess the overall attitude of nurses on PU prevention based on their scores on the Attitude towards Pressure ulcer Prevention instrument (APuP).MethodsIn this systematic review and meta-analysis, databases including Web of Science, Science Direct, PubMed, and Scopus were searched, using the following keywords: Pressure Ulcer, Pressure injury, Bedsore, Pressure Sore, Decubitus Ulcer, Attitude, and their possible combinations. Heterogeneity of studies was assessed with I² index and Cochrane-Q test. Based on heterogeneity between the studies, the data were analyzed using a random effects model. All the analyses were performed using STATA v.16 software.ResultsTwelve studies with a sample size of 7824 people were analyzed. The overall score of attitude towards pressure ulcer prevention was 70.84% (95% CI: 66.34–75.35) and the highest and lowest scores were related to the dimensions of individual priority (78.83%, 95% CI: 74.69–82.97) and competence (70.11%, 95% CI: 67.24–72.94), respectively. The percentage of the total score of attitude towards pressure ulcer prevention in nurses was higher than nursing students (72.15%, 95% CI: 67.10–77.20 vs. 67%, 95% CI: 53.80–80.20). Sensitivity analysis confirmed the stability of the results. Publication bias was significant (p = 0.036).ConclusionThe attitude of nurses and nursing students towards the prevention of pressure ulcers was moderate, and providing the necessary training to these groups was essential.     

Feasibility of a repositioning schedule on pressure ulcer prevention in a French Intensive Care Unit: A pre and post-intervention pilot study

AimsAs a prerequisite of a multicentre study, we conducted a pilot study to assess the feasibility of a daily repositioning schedule in critically ill patients. The schedule was adapted to the patient's clinical condition, and the estimated risk for developing a pressure ulcer using the Braden scale.DesignA single-center pre and post-intervention pilot study in a French Intensive Care Unit of a university teaching hospital. This study followed TREND guidelines.MethodsDuring the first period (March to May 2018), pressure ulcer prevention was performed according to usual care. During the second period (June to August 2018), the repositioning schedule was adapted to the estimated risk for developing a pressure ulcer according to the Braden scale. Eligible patients had no pressure ulcer at baseline, were intubated within 24 hours of admission and expected to receive mechanical ventilation for at least 24 hours. The primary outcome was the rate of pressure ulcer development at 28 days of hospitalization or at discharge or death, as compared with usual care. Secondary outcomes included the feasibility and safety of the schedule, as assessed by caregivers’ adherence and workload, and the rate of adverse events.ResultsIn the pre-intervention period 20 participants were included, and 14 patients were included in the post-intervention period. There was no decrease in the pressure ulcers incidence with the intervention (25% vs. 28.6%; P = 1). The number of daily repositioning performed increased from 3.3 [IQR 3.0; 3.9] during the pre-intervention period to 4.3 [IQR 3.8; 5.2] during the post-intervention period (P < 0.05), where it differed from the number scheduled by 0.6 [IQR 0.1; 1.4] per day, indicating satisfactory adherence of caregivers to the protocol. Adverse events rate did not differ between the two periods (55.9% vs. 57.1%; P = 0.90).ConclusionA personalised daily repositioning schedule in critically ill patients is feasible and safe. The efficacy of such a strategy, together with its economic impact, need to be assessed in a multicentre randomized trial.     

Prevention of pressure injuries in critically ill children: A preliminary evaluation

AimsTo evaluate a prevention strategy implemented to reduce incidence and severity of positioning related pressure injuries affecting pediatric patients in a pediatric critical care unit. Secondary objective was to evaluate compliance with preventive recommendations.BackgroundThe skin in infants or children has important physiological and anatomical differences compared with adults. Further, factors such as the immaturity of the skin and limited activity and mobility in pediatric critical care unit, along with the pressure exerted by medical devices, increases the risk of pressure ulcers in infants and children. The most effective preventive measures specific to this intensive care population need to be evaluated.Material and methodsQuasi-experimental before-after study with consecutive sampling. The effectiveness of the care bundle implementation was evaluated based on the latest evidence (intervention group) versus the application of non-standardized care (control group). Pediatric patients up to 14 years old at risk of suffering from pressure injuries and who were admitted more than 48 h in a pediatric intensive care unit (level III) participated. For the collection of data, two computer programs and the hospital clinical records of each participant were consulted. The data collection period was 6 months per group (pre and post intervention).ResultsA sample of 110 patients was obtained (50 control group and 60 intervention group). The cumulative incidence in pediatric patients exposed to the risk of pressure injuries was reduced from 16% to 13.3%; and in the subgroup of patients with prolonged stay (≥28 days), the incidence was reduced from 55.55% to 20%. In the intervention group, category III and IV pressure ulcers were completely reduced. In addition, the total number of pressure injuries decreased by 21.43%. The care bandle recommendations with the highest level of adhesion recorded were: skin inspection, application of hyperoxygenated fatty acids and use of a special support surface. The main risk factor found during the study was the prone position (p < 0.05).ConclusionsThe application of a care bundle for prevention can be an effective solution to reduce the number and severity of LPPs in an intensive care unit. The most vulnerable subgroup of patients may benefit from the application of these resources.     

The knowledge and attitudes regarding pressure ulcer prevention among healthcare support workers in the UK: A cross-sectional study

BackgroundPressure ulcers cause significant, detrimental effects on personal wellbeing. They represent a serious health and social care burden. Nurses and those working in support roles are primarily accountable for preventing pressure ulcers. Healthcare support workers are an expanding group of key workers in the UK.ObjectiveTo examine healthcare support workers’ knowledge and attitudes regarding pressure ulcer prevention.MethodsA cross-sectional study was conducted from December 2020 to June 2021, using Knowledge and Attitudes toward Pressure Ulcer Prevention Assessment Tool.ResultsA total of 164 participants completed the questionnaire fully. A low mean knowledge score of 0.42 ± 0.14, but a positive attitude score of 0.76 ± 0.10 per item were reported. The weakest areas of knowledge include aetiology, risk assessment and addressing pressure-reducing interventions for patients at risk. Higher mean scores per item in knowledge of pressure ulcer prevention were reported in participants working in acute hospital wards and nursing homes (0.468 ± 0.15, 0.47 ± 0.08 respectively) than those in other settings (p < 0.05). Participants working in primary care scored lowest (0.33 ± 0.12). The scores of participants with more positive attitudes towards pressure ulcer prevention significantly correlated with higher score of knowledge (p < 0.005).ConclusionWhile positive attitudes towards pressure ulcer prevention exist among healthcare support workers, this is overshadowed by significant knowledge deficits. Findings highlight the importance of continuing structured education for support workers across both acute and community settings. A future national survey and interventional study are needed to examine support workers’ pressure ulcer knowledge and to inform a national continuous education strategy.     

Pressure ulcer prevention and treatment knowledge of Jordanian nurses

AimsThe aims of the study were to determine: (1) Jordanian nurses' level of knowledge of pressure ulcer prevention and treatment of hospitalized patients based on guidelines for pressure ulcer prevention and treatment. (2) Frequency of utilization of pressure ulcer prevention and treatment interventions in clinical practice. (3) Variables that are associated with nurses' utilization of pressure ulcer prevention and treatment interventions.BackgroundPressure ulcers are common and previous studies have shown education, knowledge and attitude affect implementation of interventions.MethodsA cross-sectional survey design was used to collect data from 460 nurses between June 2010 and November 2010. We used a questionnaire, which was informed by earlier work and guidelines, to collect data about nurses' knowledge and practice of pressure ulcer prevention and treatment.Results/findingsKnowledge and education show an association with implementation of prevention, and demographic variables do not. Similarly knowledge and type of hospital showed an association with implementing treatment. Of concern the use of “donuts” and massage are reported in use.ConclusionAlthough pressure ulcer care is well known by nurses, inappropriate pressure ulcer interventions were reported in use.     

Sex-specific differences in prevention and treatment of institutional-acquired pressure ulcers in hospitals and nursing homes

IntroductionGender and/or sex have a major impact on staying healthy, becoming ill, or care dependent. Differences between men and women have been described for socioeconomic positions, health behaviors, courses and severities of diseases and mortality rates. Consequently, sex and/or gender need to be adequately taken into account while developing and implementing evidence-based healthcare. Evidence regarding differences between men and women in pressure ulcer care is limited. Our research aim was to measure possible differences between male and female hospital patients and nursing home residents in prevention and treatment of institutional-acquired pressure ulcers.MethodsA secondary data analysis was conducted including data sets collected in nursing homes and hospitals in Germany annually from 2001 to 2016. Relevant variables were compared according to biological sex (men/woman).ResultsThe study included 38,655 nursing home residents (mean age 85.4 years women, 77.3 years men) and 58,760 hospital patients (mean age 66.7 years women, 63.4 years men). More women were underweight and at pressure ulcer risk in both settings. The proportion of institutional-acquired pressure ulcers was higher for men in hospitals. Slightly more men had a PU category 2 to 4 (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.76 to 0.99) in nursing homes or developed an institutional-acquired pressure ulcers category 2 to 4 in both settings (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.76 to 0.95). Special mattresses were more often used by women at PU risk. More men with an institutional-acquired pressure ulcer in hospitals received counseling of relatives (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.72).ConclusionAlthough slightly more men had institutional-acquired pressure ulcers than women, overall differences regarding pressure ulcer occurrence were minor. Gender and/or sex can rather not be considered as an independent risk factor for pressure ulcer development and differences regarding pressure ulcer prevention interventions seem to be minor.     

Validity and reliability of Japanese version of the pressure ulcer knowledge assessment tool

AimTo develop Japanese version of the pressure ulcer knowledge assessment tool, a tool for measuring nurses’ pressure ulcer knowledge to effectively evaluate the efficacy of current educational programs, resulting in prevention and early treatment, and to verify its validity and reliability among Japanese nurses.Materials and methodsA total of 1716 nurses across three university hospitals participated in this study. All had been employed for at least one year. Managers, part-timers, and those in the operating room and the outpatient ward were excluded from the study as it is limited to bedside preventive care.The original tool was translated into Japanese using the Brislin's translation model. A cross-sectional study was used to examine the reliability and validity of the measure within a Japanese sample. Assessment of the multiple-choice test items included analysis of the validity (item difficulty and discriminating index), construct validity, internal consistency, and stability (test–retest reliability).ResultsThe item difficulty indices ranged from 0.17 to 0.95, whereas values for item discrimination ranged from 0.15 to 0.45. Known group validity of the scale was confirmed; therefore, the higher-expertize group consisting of wound, ostomy, and continence nurses significantly outperformed nurses certified in other fields. The overall internal consistency reliability was 0.86 with a two-week test–retest intraclass correlation of 0.60.ConclusionsThe instrument may be applied as a reliable and valid measure to assess nurses’ pressure ulcer knowledge in the fields of nursing education, research, and practice in Japan.     

Knowledge,attitude, and practice of Iranian critical care nurses related to prevention of pressure ulcers: A multicenter cross-sectional study

IntroductionPressure ulcers (PU) are a major, but preventable health problem in all health settings, but especially in intensive care units (ICUs). This study aimed to investigate the knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) of Iranian ICU nurses related to the prevention of PU.MethodsIn a cross-sectional study, data obtained from 183 ICU nurses working in four hospitals affiliated to Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran were evaluated. The study was conducted from July to October 2020. Data were collected using a four-part questionnaire including demographic characteristics, Pieker Pressure Ulcer Knowledge Test (PPUKT), Attitude toward Pressure Ulcer Prevention (APUP) tool, and the practice of nurses related to the prevention of PU.FindingsThe mean scores of KAP of ICU nurses toward PU prevention were 70.57 (SD = 13.51), 52.82 (SD = 6.16), and 22.44 (SD = 5.20), respectively. There was a positive correlation between nurses' attitude and practice (r = 0.232, P = 0.002), and a negative correlation between knowledge and attitude (r = ?0.156, P = 0.035) of nurses regarding PU prevention. Additionally, a positive correlation was found between nurses' years of working experience in ICU and their knowledge regarding PU prevention (r = 0.159, P = 0.032).ConclusionAccording to the results of the present study, the level of KAP of Iranian ICU nurses related to PU prevention were desirable, positive, and relatively desirable. Therefore, nurse managers and policymakers should try to eliminate the main barriers such as heavy workload, inadequate nurse staffing, and lack of appropriate guidelines for PU prevention which consequently affect the practice of ICU nurses in the prevention of PU.     

Knowledge,attitude, and practice of Iranian nurses towards pressure ulcer prevention: A systematic review

IntroductionPressure ulcer (PU), as a long-term disabling condition, is an important indicator for patient safety and quality of nursing care in hospitals. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the knowledge, attitude, and practice of Iranian nurses towards PU prevention.MethodsA systematic search was conducted on PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus databases, Google Scholar Search Engine, as well as Magiran, Iranmedex, and Scientific Information Database (SID) Persian databases using the relevant keywords, from the earliest date available to August 21, 2020. Studies were appraised using the appraisal tool for cross-sectional studies (AXIS tool).FindingsAmong a total of 1,543 Iranian nurses included in the 9 studies, 80.53% were female with a mean age of 31.14 (SD = 5.52) years. The mean work experience of the participants was 7.94 years (SD = 5.44). The knowledge and practice of Iranian nurses toward PU prevention were insufficient and relatively desirable, respectively. Also, the present study showed that nurses' attitudes toward PU prevention were contradictory. Age, gender, level of education, work experience, and participation in previous educational workshops were possible factors related to nurses' knowledge about PU prevention. Women with higher work experience had a more positive attitude.ConclusionThis review found inappropriate knowledge, attitude, and practice of Iranian nurses toward PU prevention and highlights the importance of regular upgrading of nurses' knowledge and practice related to PU prevention.     

Nurses' knowledge and practice of pressure ulcer prevention and treatment: An observational study

Aims and objectivesTo assess nurses' knowledge on pressure ulcer (PU) prevention and treatment in Jordan, and the frequency of and factors influencing nurses’ implementation of PU prevention and treatment interventions.BackgroundHighly educated and experienced nurses can provide effective PU care; however, previous studies highlighted poor knowledge and implementation of PU care.DesignA correlational study examining nurses’ knowledge of PU prevention and frequency of PU preventive actions in Jordanian hospitals.MethodsParticipants were 377 nurses and 318 patients from 11 hospitals. Data were collected to quantify the frequency of nurses’ implementation of pressure ulcer prevention and treatment interventions for patients suffering from PUs and/or at risk of PU development using a self-reported cross-sectional survey and prospective 8-h observation.ResultsFor observed PU prevention while type of hospital and number of beds in units were significant it is not known without further work if this is replicable. For observed PU treatment, linear regression analysis revealed significant negative beta values for more than 50 beds in clinical unit (β = −2.49).ConclusionThe study addressed new factors, facilitating the provision of prevention and treatment strategies to PU development, including type of clinical institution and number of beds in clinical unit.Relevance to clinical practiceThere is a need to develop training programmes to improve insufficient nurses’ knowledge and, thus, clinical practices on PU prevention and treatment. These programmes would assist both junior and senior nurses and other key stakeholders (e.g. hospital managers, policy-makers, and educators) to improve the performance of PU services, thus, minimising patient suffering.     

The economic impact of pressure ulcers among patients in intensive care units. A systematic review

BackgroundThe incidence and prevalence of pressure ulcers in critically ill patients in intensive care units (ICUs) remain high, despite the wealth of knowledge on appropriate prevention strategies currently available.MethodsThe primary objective of this systematic review was to examine the economic impact of pressure ulcers (PU) among adult intensive care patients. A systematic review was undertaken, and the following databases were searched; Medline, Embase, CINAHL, and The Cochrane Library. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines was used to formulate the review. Quality appraisal was undertaken using the Consensus on Health Economic Criteria (CHEC)-list. Data were extracted using a pre-designed extraction tool, and a narrative analysis was undertaken.ResultsSeven studies met the inclusion criteria. Five reported costs associated with the prevention of pressure ulcers and three explored costs of treatment strategies. Four main PU prevention cost items were identified: support surfaces, dressing materials, staff costs, and costs associated with mobilisation. Seven main PU treatment cost items were reported: dressing materials, support surfaces, drugs, surgery, lab tests, imaging, additional stays and nursing care. The overall validities of the studies varied between 37 and 79%, meaning that there is potential for bias within all the included studies.ConclusionThere was a significant difference in the cost of PU prevention and treatment strategies between studies. This is problematic as it becomes difficult to accurately evaluate costs from the existing literature, thereby inhibiting the usefulness of the data to inform practice. Given the methodological heterogeneity among studies, future studies in this area are needed and these should use specific methodological guidelines to generate high-quality health economic studies.     

The trend of pressure ulcer prevalence rates in German hospitals: Results of seven cross-sectional studies

Pressure ulcer prevalence rates provide useful information about the magnitude of this health problem. Only limited information on pressure ulcers in Germany was available before 2001. The purpose of this study was to compare results of seven pressure ulcer prevalence surveys which were conducted annually between 2001 and 2007 and to explore whether pressure ulcer prevalence rates decreased. The second aim was to evaluate if the measured prevalence rates of our sample could be generalised for all German hospitals.Results of seven point pressure ulcer prevalence studies conducted in 225 German hospitals were analysed. Chi-square tests, chi-square trend tests and one-way ANOVA to assess differences and trends across the years were applied. The sample was stratified according to pressure ulcer risk and speciality. Finally, study samples were compared with the potential population.In total data of 40,247 hospital patients were analysed. The overall pressure ulcer prevalence rate in German hospitals was 10.2%. Patient samples of each year were comparable regarding gender, age and pressure ulcer risk. Pressure ulcer prevalence rates decreased from 13.9% (year 2001) to 7.3% (year 2007) (p < 0.001). When excluding non-blanchable erythema prevalence rates decreased from 6.4% (year 2001) to 3.9% (year 2007) (p = 0.015). An explicit decrease of prevalence rates was observed on geriatric wards. Prevalence rates on neurological and intensive care units remained stable. With some limitations our study results are representative for all hospitals within Germany.It is highly probable that the decrease of prevalence rates was due to an increased awareness of the pressure ulcer problem in Germany and subsequent efforts to improve pressure ulcer prevention and treatment. The quality of clinical practice regarding pressure ulcer prevention and treatment has improved. However, pressure ulcers are still relevant and require attention. In 2007, one out of 10 hospital patients who were at pressure ulcer risk had at least one pressure related skin damage.     

Effects of education about prevention of pressure ulcer on knowledge and attitudes of nursing students

BackgroundPressure ulcer is a significant healthcare problem throughout the world. Nurse educators should take the responsibility for students’ improving knowledge, skills and attitudes regarding prevention of Pressure ulcer and allocate sufficient time to teach them by using various teaching methods. In this study we evaluate effects of education about prevention of pressure ulcer on knowledge and attitudes of nursing students.MethodsThis is a quasi-experimental study with a control group and a posttest. The study population comprised of 96 second-year nursing students at a university in Middle Anatolia Region of Turkey. The study sample included 84 second year nursing students, of whom 42 were assigned into an intervention group and 42 were assigned into a control group. The intervention group was offered education for two hours weekly for four weeks. Data collection between April and May in 2019. The statistics program SPSS 22 packaged software was used in the analyses of data.ResultsThere was not a significant difference in sociodemographic features between the intervention and control groups. The groups significantly differed in their total scores for attitudes to prevention of pressure ulcer (p < 0.05). The intervention group got a significantly higher mean score for knowledge about prevention of pressure ulcer (63.00 ± 16.71) than the control group (39.35 ± 9.77) (p < 0.05).ConclusionThe control group had lower scores for knowledge and attitudes about prevention, evaluation and management of pressure ulcer. Educators should revise the content of the national nursing curriculum about pressure ulcer and update their learning material and lectures in accordance with national and international guidelines.     

Examination of the psychometric properties of the Persian version of the attitude towards pressure ulcer prevention instrument in nurses

IntroductionPressure ulcer development is a known indicator of the quality of care. Negative attitudes towards the prevention of pressure ulcers can lead to preventive care with suboptimal quality. There is no valid and reliable instrument in Iran to assess clinicians’ attitudes towards pressure ulcer prevention; therefore, this study aimed to examine the psychometric properties of the Persian version of the Attitude towards Pressure ulcer Prevention instrument (APuP) in Nurses.MethodsIn this cross-sectional study, 250 nurses were selected using a convenience sampling method. Face, content, and construct validity were examined using exploratory factor analysis (EFA). Internal consistency was assessed using the McDonald's omega (ω), and reliability was assessed using the test-retest method.ResultsIn the EFA, five factors of Competence, Responsibility, Perceived Consequences of Pressure Ulcers on Patients, Priority, and Confidence in the Effectiveness of Prevention were extracted that together explained 50.26% of the total variance. A McDonald's ω of 0.891 demonstrated the internal consistency of the total scale, and internal consistencies ranging from 0.70 to 0.86 were found for different dimensions of the instrument. In addition, an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.876 was found that indicated the reliability (stability) of the total scale (95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 0.736–0.963).ConclusionThe Persian version of the Attitude towards Pressure ulcer Prevention instrument (APuP) has good validity and reliability in Iranian nurses and can be used in future clinical studies.     

Certification and education: do they affect pressure ulcer knowledge in nursing?

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether wound care certification and education affect nursing knowledge. This study examined pressure ulcer knowledge among registered nurses who were (1) certified in wound care, (2) certified in specialty areas other than wound care, or (3) not certified in any specialty area. DESIGN: A convenience sample of 460 nurses, located in both urban and rural areas, provided demographic information and completed a standardized pressure ulcer knowledge test using (Pieper Pressure Ulcer Knowledge Tool). RESULTS: The mean standardized test score for the total sample was 78%, with nurses certified in wound care scoring 89%, nurses certified in specialties other than wound care scoring 78%, and nurses receiving no certification scoring 76.5%. CONCLUSION: Wound care certification and education significantly affect nursing knowledge.