Immediate tooth extraction,placement of a Tapered Screw-Vent implant,and provisionalization in the esthetic zone: a case report

PURPOSE: This clinical report describes an immediate tooth extraction, followed by placement and provisional restoration of a dental implant in the prepared socket of a right maxillary central incisor. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The tooth was extracted with minimal hard and soft tissue trauma and without flap reflection. A flapless, transmucosal surgical approach was used to prepare the socket and insert a tapered implant. The implant was immediately restored with a provisional abutment and crown without occlusal contacts. An impression was made 22 days after implant insertion, and a definitive, all-ceramic restoration was placed 3 days later. RESULTS: During the period of provisional progressive loading, no significant soft tissue contraction was observed related to noninvasive operating techniques and the immediate insertion of the provisional restoration. The patient exhibited no clinical or radiologic complications through 8 months of clinical monitoring after loading. CONCLUSION: The Tapered Screw-Vent implant and all-ceramic restoration provided the patient with immediate esthetics, function, and comfort without any complications during the postloading follow-up period.     

Immediate non-occlusal vs. early loading of dental implants in partially edentulous patients: a multicentre randomized clinical trial. Peri-implant bone and soft-tissue levels

Objectives: To compare peri‐implant bone and soft‐tissue levels of immediately non‐occlusally loaded vs. non‐submerged early loaded implants in partially edentulous patients up to 14 months after placement. Material and methods: Fifty‐two patients were randomized in five Italian private practices: 25 in the immediately loaded group and 27 in the early loaded group. To be immediately loaded, single implants had to be inserted with a torque of ≥30 N cm, and splinted implants with a torque of ≥20 N cm. Immediately loaded implants were provided with non‐occluding temporary restorations within 48 h. After 2 months, the provisional restorations were placed in full occlusion. Implants were early loaded after 2 months. Final restorations were provided 8 months after placement. Blinded assessors evaluated peri‐implant bone and soft‐tissue levels. Results: Fifty‐two implants were immediately loaded and 52 were early loaded. No drop‐out occurred. One single immediately loaded implant failed 2 months after placement. Both groups gradually lost peri‐implant bone in a highly statistically significant manner at 2, 8, and 14 months. After 14 months, patients of both groups lost an average of 1.1 mm of peri‐implant bone. There were no statistically significant differences between the two loading strategies for peri‐implant bone and soft‐tissue level changes (P>0.05). After 14 months, the position of the soft tissues did not change significantly from baseline (delivery of the final restorations 8 months after placement). Conclusions: There were no statistically or clinically significant differences between immediate and early loading of dental implants with regard to peri‐implant bone and soft‐tissue levels as evaluated in the present study.     

牙龈原位扩增技术在上颌前牙即刻种植中的应用

目的研究牙龈原位扩增技术在上颌前牙即刻种植中的短期临床效果。方法对16例拟行即刻种植的上颌前牙残根残冠使用牙龈原位扩增技术,待获得足够牙龈软组织后进行即刻种植,经软组织塑形后,完成最终上部结构。随访3～12个月,对种植体周围软硬组织进行评价。结果16例种植体均获得良好骨结合,种植体无松动、无脱落。种植体周围软硬组织状态良好,美学效果满意。结论上颌前牙即刻种植应用牙龈原位扩增技术短期临床效果满意。     

A short-term clinical evaluation of immediately restored maxillary TiOblast single-tooth implants

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the short-term clinical outcome of single-tooth implants placed in the maxilla and immediately restored using cementless friction-fit temporary crowns. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-five patients consecutively referred to a private specialist practice for the replacement of failing or missing maxillary teeth were treated by means of immediate temporization of their single-tooth implants. Where teeth were still present, implants were placed immediately following extraction. Provisional crowns were fabricated on a special friction-fit coping by means of autopolymerizing acrylic resin. Definitive crowns were placed a mean of 4.5 months after surgery. Implant survival was recorded along with the level of the marginal bone relative to a fixed reference point 1 year after placement. Any adverse soft tissue changes were also noted. RESULTS: A total of 28 Astra Tech ST dental implants were placed. The overall survival rate at the end of the study was 96.4% for implants which were in function for periods ranging from 15.7 to 27 months. One patient, a smoker, lost 1 implant within 1 month of surgery. Mean marginal bone loss was 0.40 mm (range 0 to 1.53 mm) 1 year after placement of the implants. Many implants (37.5%) had no observed bone loss. No implants or crowns have been lost during the functional loading period. One implant was associated with an unfavorable recession of soft tissues; however, most maintained an esthetic gingival architecture. Eleven of 28 provisional restorations needed treatment; 6 required replacement during the temporization period, and 5 required cementation because of looseness. The ease of removal of the crowns allowed regular access for irrigation with chlorhexidine and thus maintenance of soft tissue health. DISCUSSION: The need to provide provisional restorations for single-tooth gaps often presents challenges. An immediate temporary partial denture or adhesive prosthesis may be unacceptable or impractical. The current study describes a simple method for the immediate temporization of single-tooth implants. The results did not indicate any negative influence on osseointegration or short-term survival once the implants were functionally loaded. CONCLUSION: Immediate temporization of maxillary single-tooth implants can be both safe and predictable, and it appears that the procedure can yield favorable soft tissue esthetics.     

Effects of immediate loading with threaded hydroxyapatite-coated root-form implants on single premolar replacements: a preliminary report

PURPOSE: This prospective study evaluated the immediate loading of single, threaded, root-form implants placed in the maxillary premolar area. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten human subjects were included in this preliminary report. In all cases, a screw-retained temporary acrylic resin crown was placed immediately after implant surgery. The definitive screw-retained metal-ceramic crown was placed 6 months later. RESULTS: Standardized radiographs demonstrated 0.58, 0.73, 0.84, and 0.90 mm mean marginal bone loss at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after implant surgery, respectively. Implant mobility was evaluated with the Periotest device. At the day of surgery, mean mobility was -3.3, while minor changes were observed thereafter: mean values of -3.77, -3.47, and -3.63 were recorded at 3, 6, and 12 months after implant surgery, respectively. Sulcus depth appeared relatively stable after the 3rd month when the implant platform was used as a reference. Recession of 0.43 mm was recorded between the 3rd and 12th month; when the depth of the peri-implant sulcus was measured from the implant platform, 0.1 mm of change was seen between the 3rd and 12th month. Probing depth measurements revealed that 3 months after implant placement, average probing depth was 3.60 mm, while at 12 months it was 3.20 mm. DISCUSSION: The peri-implant soft tissue parameters (bleeding on probing, probing depth, peri-implant soft tissue level), mobility, and marginal bone level appeared to be similar to findings of previous studies regarding the conventional 2-stage loading protocol. CONCLUSION: Results of the current study provided evidence that, under the condition of this investigation, single root-form implants can be immediately loaded when placed in the maxillary premolar area.     

Immediate maxillary lateral incisor implants with nonocclusal loading provisional crowns.

This clinical report series describes a treatment modality involving immediately placed dental implants in maxillary lateral incisor sites using noncemented immediate provisional crowns retained with calcinable copings (prosthetic complement used in preparing the metal for the definitive prosthesis). Ten implants were placed in eight patients for the replacement of maxillary lateral incisors: two immediate and eight corresponding to cases of agenesis. All were subjected to immediate rehabilitation with provisional acrylic resin crowns in nonocclusal loading. One implant failed 3 weeks after placement due to acute local trauma. The other nine remained functional within the mouth, with normal clinical and radiological characteristics after a minimum of 12-month follow-up. Immediate placement of implant fixed provisional restorations retained by friction in maxillary lateral incisors offers an esthetic solution, eliminates the need for a removable provisional restoration, and avoids implant failures associated with excess cement or screw loosening. Moreover, in the case of extractions, immediate placement and provisionalization of implants in maxillary lateral incisors can effectively optimize the peri-implant esthetic results by maintaining the existing hard and soft tissue architecture of the replaced tooth. As no cement or screws are required, and the provisional crowns are placed in nonocclusal loading, the risk of complications is minimized.     

Immediate nonocclusal versus early loading of dental implants in partially edentulous patients: 1-year results from a multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trial

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of immediate nonocclusal loading (test group) versus early loading (control group) in partially edentulous patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-two patients in 5 Italian private practices were randomized to 1 of the treatments: 25 to the immediately loaded group and 27 to the early loaded group. To be immediately loaded, single implants had to be inserted with a torque of > 30 Ncm, and splinted implants had to be inserted with a torque of > 20 Ncm. Implants in the immediately loaded group were provided with full acrylic resin nonoccluding temporary restorations within 48 hours after placement. After 2 months, full occluding provisional restorations were provided. Implants in the early loading group were not submerged and were loaded after 2 months. At 8 months, provisional restorations were replaced with definitive metal-ceramic prostheses. Outcome measures were prosthesis and implant failures as well as biologic and prosthetic complications recorded by nonblinded assessors. The Fisher exact test was used to compare the proportion of implant failures. RESULTS: Fifty-two implants were placed in the immediately loaded group and 52 in the early loaded group. No dropouts or complications occurred up to 14 months postinsertion. One single implant failed in the immediately loaded group 2 months after placement. There was no statistically difference for the tested outcome measures between the 2 procedures (P > .99). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this randomized controlled clinical trial with 25 patients rehabilitated with immediately restored nonocclusally loaded implant-supported prostheses compared to 27 patients restored 2 months following placement suggest that there are no major clinical differences in implant survival between these 2 protocols. No biologic or prosthetic complications occurred.     

Customized abutments to shape and transfer peri-implant soft-tissue contours

With the functional successes of implant therapy being realized, the emphasis is shifting to the creation of tooth-like esthetics with implant therapy. Dental implants are placed after careful planning and site preparation, which may include bone and soft tissue grafting. The final soft tissue appearance is enhanced through the early use of provisional restorations. A combination technique is described to fabricate provisional healing abutments for cement-on prostheses and to transfer the individualized peri-implant soft-tissue contours to the dental laboratory. This technique will allow the practitioner to deliver highly customized implant care with familiar techniques and readily available materials.     

Replacement of mandibular molars with single-unit restorations supported by wide-body implants: immediate versus delayed loading. A randomized controlled study

PURPOSE: This prospective randomized controlled trial aimed to compare single implant-supported mandibular molar restorations using either an immediate or a delayed loading protocol. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty subjects requiring single mandibular molar replacement were consecutively treated. One implant was placed in each patient. Fifteen subjects were assigned to delayed loading protocol and 15 to immediate loading protocol according to a randomization table. After insertion, the delayed loaded implants were connected to a healing abutment and restored after 3 to 4 months of healing without loading. The immediately loaded implants were loaded within 24 hours of surgery with a provisional restoration. The interim prosthesis was placed in centric occlusion. All contacts in lateral excursions were eliminated. At implant placement the maximum value of insertion torque was recorded. Radiographic bone level change was measured on periapical radiographs obtained at the time of implant placement and 12 months after loading. Means of the 2 groups were compared by Student t test and analysis of variance (ANOVA). The level of significance was set at .05. RESULTS: No implants were lost in the delayed loading group (0/15), whereas 1 implant failed (1/15) in the immediate loading group. No differences were observed in relation to implant length or insertion torque between the groups. The average radiographic bone level change after 1 year of function was 1.2 +/- 0.55 mm (range, 0.5 to 2.6 mm) and 0.77 +/- 0.38 mm (range, 0.29 to 1.23 mm) for the delayed loaded and the immediately loaded implants, respectively. The difference in radiographic bone level change between the delayed and immediate loading groups was statistically significant (P = .022; CI = -0.79 to -0.06; Student t test). CONCLUSIONS: Immediate loading of wide-diameter implants supporting single restorations in mandibular molar sites seems to be a suitable clinical option. Moreover, the radiographic bone level change observed after 12 months of loading was significantly less for immediately loaded implants.     

Maxillary single-tooth replacement utilizing a novel ceramic restorative system: results to 30 months

This study reports on the first longitudinal results of an alumina (70%)-zirconia (30%) ceramic restorative system for implant-supported, single-tooth replacement in the anterior maxillary jaw. Eighteen patients (9 men, 9 women, mean age = 42.4 years) were treated with 22 implants placed into 19 extraction sockets and 3 residual ridges. Eight implants were immediately loaded with nonoccluding provisional prostheses. All implants were definitively loaded with fully occluding ceramic restorations after osseointegration and soft tissue maturation. Patients were monitored from 7 to 30 months (mean = 18.1 months) after loading. All implants osseointegrated and were successfully restored. One case of abutment screw loosening occurred because of patient parafunction (bruxing), and another patient reported chewing pain attributed to malocclusion. Both problems were successfully resolved without further incidence. Within the context of this study, single-tooth replacement in the anterior maxillary jaw was successfully achieved with alumina-zirconia ceramic single-tooth restorations with up to 30 months of clinical function.     

上颌前牙即刻种植即刻修复的临床应用研究

目的:评估上颌前牙区即刻种植即刻修复的临床应用效果,特别是美学效果,并探讨其临床应用技巧及美学影响因素。方法:选择16例共18颗无法保存的上前牙,微创拔除后即刻植入Xi ve或Repl ace种植体共18枚,均于48小时内完成临时固定修复,4～6个月后完成最终修复。种植永久修复后追踪观察12～36个月,观察种植体周围软硬组织情况,统计种植义齿存留率、牙龈乳头充盈指数以及修复体与相邻天然牙唇侧牙龈的协调性、患者主观满意度。结果:在观察期内18枚种植体均获得了良好的骨结合,种植体无松动,种植体周围未见病理性骨吸收,存留率为100%;18枚种植修复体周围共34个牙龈乳头充盈指数均为2到3度,其中24个(70.6%)为3度;15枚种植修复体唇侧龈缘位置与相邻天然牙协调无差异,3枚轻度差异;16枚种植修复体与相邻天然牙牙龈颜色质地协调无差异,2枚轻度差异。患者主观满意度VAS值平均达91.5。结论:在严格掌握适应证的前提下,应用正确的手术技巧对无法保存的上前牙进行微创拔除后即刻种植即刻修复能获得理想的临床效果,特别是美学效果。     

Management of interdental papillae loss with forced eruption, immediate implantation, and root-form pontic

BACKGROUND: A 25-year-old Asian woman complained of an unesthetic black triangle between her upper right front teeth. Defective interdental papillae may result from external root resorption, which makes esthetic restoration more difficult. A combined use of forced eruption, immediate implant placement, and a root-form pontic made a successful esthetic and functional restoration. METHODS: The treatment sequences of this patient included short-term forced eruption, subsequent immediate implant placement after tooth extraction, and a provisional root-form pontic restoration. A final prosthesis was completed 6 months later, followed by clinical maintenance. RESULTS: Papillae were augmented by forced eruption. After immediate implantation and root-form pontic placement had been performed, the peri-implant soft and hard tissues were manipulated and maintained in a stable state. CONCLUSIONS: We successfully reconstructed the interdental papillae and replaced the deficient tooth with an immediate implantation. During 2 years of follow-up, the implant and peri-implant structures remained stable and healthy.     

A prospective multicenter study evaluating loading of osseotite implants two months after placement: one-year results.

Historically, the recommended time between placement and functional loading of machined-surface dental implants has been 3 months for the mandible and 6 months for the maxilla. However, such recommendations are a result of evaluating randomly chosen healing times during the initial phase of implant development and are based on the subsequent clinical outcome of either implant integration or mobility. In recent years, histologic and experimental studies have shown that specifically designed micro-topographic implant surfaces can result in increased bone-to-implant contact at earlier healing times than obtained with machined-surface implants. Histologic and clinical studies investigating early and immediate implant loading support the premise that implants can be placed into function earlier than previously recommended. With the development of specifically designed implant surfaces and the utilization of time-saving surgical (one-stage surgical protocol) and prosthetic (implant position indexing) techniques, patients are now being restored and returning to function sooner than previously thought possible. The purpose of this multicenter clinical investigation is to evaluate the efficacy of loading Osseotite dental implants (3i-Implant Innovations Inc., Palm Beach Gardens, Florida) at 2 months and to determine the effect of early loading on implant performance and survival. A total of 429 Osseotite implants were placed in 155 patients (87 females and 68 males; mean age 54.0 +/- 13.7 yr), at 10 study centers, and subsequently loaded 2.1 +/- 0.7 months following placement. A single-stage surgical protocol was followed, with implants indexed immediately or impressed 4 to 6 weeks following placement. Patient restorative treatments included placement of 83 single-implant provisional restorations and 129 splinted, two-, three-, and four-implant supported maxillary and mandibular provisional restorations. The mean time from prosthetic loading to the most recent follow-up evaluation was 10 +/- 1.3 months. Seven of the 429 implants did not integrate; of these, six were identified prior to loading and one was identified 1 month after loading. The cumulative implant survival rate was 98.5% at 12.6 months. The cumulative post-loading implant survival rate was 99.8% at 10.5 months. The preliminary results of this clinical investigation suggest that successful functional loading of the Osseotite dental implant is possible at 2 months following noncomplicated implant placement.     

A Prospective Multicenter Study Evaluating Loading of Osseotite Implants Two Months After Placement: One-Year Results

Abstract: Historically, the recommended time between placement and functional loading of machined-surface dental implants has been 3 months for the mandible and 6 months for the maxilla. However, such recommendations are a result of evaluating randomly chosen healing times during the initial phase of implant development and are based on the subsequent clinical outcome of either implant integration or mobility. In recent years, histologic and experimental studies have shown that specifically designed micro-topographic implant surfaces can result in increased bone-to-implant contact at earlier healing times than obtained with machined-surface implants. Histologic and clinical studies investigating early and immediate implant loading support the premise that implants can be placed into function earlier than previously recommended. With the development of specifically designed implant surfaces and the utilization of time-saving surgical (one-stage surgical protocol) and prosthetic (implant position indexing) techniques, patients are now being restored and returning to function sooner than previously thought possible. The purpose of this multicenter clinical investigation is to evaluate the efficacy of loading Osseotite dental implants (3i-Implant Innovations Inc., Palm Beach Gardens, Florida) at 2 months and to determine the effect of early loading on implant performance and survival. A total of 429 Osseotite implants were placed in 155 patients (87 females and 68 males; mean age 54.0 ± 13.7 yr), at 10 study centers, and subsequently loaded 2.1 ± 0.7 months following placement. A single-stage surgical protocol was followed, with implants indexed immediately or impressed 4 to 6 weeks following placement. Patient restorative treatments included placement of 83 single-implant provisional restorations and 129 splinted, two-, three-, and four-implant supported maxillary and mandibular provisional restorations. The mean time from prosthetic loading to the most recent follow-up evaluation was 10 ± 1.3 months. Seven of the 429 implants did not integrate; of these, six were identified prior to loading and one was identified 1 month after loading. The cumulative implant survival rate was 98.5% at 12.6 months. The cumulative post-loading implant survival rate was 99.8% at 10.5 months. The preliminary results of this clinical investigation suggest that successful functional loading of the Osseotite dental implant is possible at 2 months following noncomplicated implant placement.     

Implant Digital Impression in the Esthetic Area

The aim of this report is to describe two standardized protocols for digital impression when implant support rehabilitation is used in the esthetic area. The two techniques were used to transfer all provisional crown parameters to definitive restorations in different clinical scenarios. In the direct technique, an impression (STL1) is made of the provisional restorations attached to the implants, with surrounding gingival tissue. The second scan (STL2) captures the sulcular aspect of the peri‐implant soft tissue immediately after removal of the provisional restoration. The last impression (STL3) of the complete arch is made with a standardized scanbody attached to the implant to capture the 3D location of the implant. The direct technique is indicated when the peri‐implant soft tissues are stable upon removal of the provisional restoration. The indirect technique is used when the gingival tissue collapses rapidly after the removal of the provisional crown. The impressions of the provisional restoration and the position of the implant are similar to those obtained with the direct technique, and the shape of the peri‐implant tissue is extrapolated from the negative shape obtained from making the digital impression when the provisional restoration is taken out of the mouth. Finally, in both techniques the 3 scans are superimposed to obtain a file, which contains the details of the peri‐implant soft tissue. The direct and indirect digital techniques allowed realization of a predictable definitive restoration in the esthetic zone in different clinical scenarios, reducing the duration of clinical procedures.     

Immediate loading of 190 endosseous dental implants: a prospective observational study of 40 patient treatments with up to 2-year data

PURPOSE: The present study was undertaken to determine the feasibility of using primary stability as a predictor of implant success in patients whose implants were immediately loaded. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 40 patients, in whom a total of 190 implants were placed, 102 in maxillary sites and 88 in mandibular sites. All were loaded within 72 hours of placement. Sixteen patients were completely edentulous in the mandible and/or the maxilla. The remaining 24, who were partially edentulous, received fixed partial dentures or single-implant restorations. All of the definitive implant restorations were screw retained. The criterion for loading was clinical judgment of primary stability, verified by a "screw test." Impressions were made after implant placement to facilitate the fabrication of a laboratory-made heat-processed provisional restoration from acrylic resin. Following a 4-month period for osseointegration and soft tissue healing, definitive fixed prostheses were fabricated. RESULTS: There were no surgical complications. After 1 to 2 years, all 190 implants had survived and were considered 100% successful, as determined by independent testing of mobility and radiographic evidence of osseointegration. In 4 patients, fracture of the provisional restoration occurred during the healing period. DISCUSSION: Clinical research has shown that immediate loading is a viable treatment modality. The favorable success rate reported in this study for rough-surfaced implants suggests that adherence to a protocol, an important parameter of which is primary stability above 32 Ncm, can lead to osseointegration. CONCLUSION: The results of this limited investigation suggest that patients who are partially or completely edentulous may be immediately restored with implants and fixed provisional restorations, provided that the dental implants are adequately stable immediately after their surgical placement. This alternative therapeutic approach did not appear to affect the up-to-2-year survival of the implants in this patient population.     

Immediate restoration of single implants placed immediately after implant removal. A case report

The purpose of this case report is to describe the treatment of implants placed in fresh extraction sockets and immediately restored in cases of failure. A healthy 58-year-old nonsmoking man was referred for an implant that had lost osseointegration because of infection. The prosthesis showed slight mobility. It was therefore decided to remove the implant and replace it with a new one immediately. Since the patient refused to wear a provisional removable prosthesis, the possibility of applying an immediate loading protocol was discussed. The failed implant was removed carefully and the residual extraction socket was thoroughly debrided. Subsequently, the new implant was placed with a sterile surgical technique, as described by the manufacturer. The inserted implant had a titanium plasma-sprayed surface. Immediately following implant placement and with the patient still under local anesthesia, the initial restorative treatment began. The patient was placed on a strict follow-up regimen until soft tissue healing was complete. Subsequent follow-up examinations were performed after 12 months. At each recall, the patient underwent a thorough clinical and radiographic evaluation. The healing period proceeded smoothly. At the end of the follow-up period, the implant was asymptomatic, immobile, and osseointegrated. No peri-implant bony defects were observed on probing. The results of the present case report seem to suggest that implants placed in fresh extraction sockets and restored immediately might provide a valid treatment option for the treatment of failed implants.     

Immediate loading of implants with fixed restorations in the completely edentulous mandible: report of 27 patients from a private practice.

Numerous authors have documented clinical success in loading threaded implants at the time of implant placement when carefully controlled surgical and restorative protocols are followed. This clinical series documents the application of immediate loading techniques to fixed mandibular restorations in 27 patients who were edentulous or had non-restorable mandibular dentitions. Eighteen patients had complete conventional maxillary dentures, while 9 had natural or fixed prosthetic maxillary dentitions. Twelve different restorative dentists provided prosthetic support for these patients and used 4 different restoration types: laboratory- or office-processed, with cement or screw retention. Five to 8 threaded implants were placed in each patient. One hundred sixty-one of the 186 implants that were placed by the authors were loaded immediately using fixed provisional restorations of the various designs. More than 99% (160/161) of the immediately loaded implants and 99.5% (185/186) of all implants were clinically integrated and radiographically successful at the time of final evaluation for restoration fabrication. After final implant evaluation, no additional implant losses occurred, indicating an implant survival rate of nearly 100% over a mean of 25.0 months (range 13 to 41 months) following implant placement. While a strong preference for cement-retained restorations was apparent, all prostheses showed similar success. The data and the experience described in this report indicate that immediate loading with fixed restorations using appropriate surgical and restorative techniques can be a predictable technique for rehabilitation of the completely edentulous mandible.     

Syncrystallization: a technique for temporization of immediately loaded implants with metal-reinforced acrylic resin restorations

Background Rigid temporization has been recognized to have a significant impact on the peri‐implant tissue response in immediate implant loading since it reduces the mechanical stress exerted on each implant. Purpose A successful protocol for immediate loading of multiple implants depends on an adequate fixation and immobility of the implants to prevent the risk of micromovements in relation to the surrounding bone. The objective of this article was to evaluate a prosthetic concept for an accelerated rigid splinting of multiple implants for same‐day immediate loading with metal‐reinforced provisional restorations using a technique of welding temporary implant abutments with a prefabricated titanium bar directly in the oral cavity (syncrystallization). Materials and Methods Between June 2004 and January 2005, immediate loading of threaded implants with a metal‐ reinforced acrylic resin provisional restoration at stage 1 surgery was evaluated in 40 consecutive patients. A total of 192 implants were placed in selected edentulous or partially edentulous patients using the syncrystallization technique. Once the titanium bar was welded intraorally to the abutments, opaque was applied and the provisional restoration was relined and screw‐retained the same day. In addition, a comparison of deformations and stress distributions in implant‐supported, metal‐reinforced and nonmetal‐reinforced resin provisional restorations was analyzed in the edentulous mandible by a three‐dimensional finite element model (FEM). Results All of the 192 rigidly temporized immediately loaded implants osseointegrated. An implant success rate of 100% was achieved over a period of 6 months postplacement. No fracture or luting cement failure of the provisional restoration occurred during the observation time. Compared to mere acrylic superstructures, a significant reduction of deformation and strain within metal‐reinforced provisional restorations was detected by FEM analysis. Conclusion The results of this study indicate that the syncrystallization technique allows an expedite and adequate rigid splinting of multiple immediately loaded implants. The advantages of the technique are: (1) reduction of treatment time for immediate temporization at stage 1 surgery; (2) predictable fixation and immobility of implants in the early stages of bone healing; and (3) less time for repairing provisional restorations as a result of no or rare fracture.     

一段式小直径种植体在小缺牙间隙即刻修复种植的临床研究

目的研究Osstem MS一段式小直径种植体用于5～6 mm的缺牙间隙即刻修复种植的临床效果。方法在36例患者的36个5～6 mm缺牙间隙处植入直径2.5 mm或3.0 mm的Osstem MS一段式小直径种植体36颗,即刻在椅旁或技工室完成树脂冠临时修复,树脂冠避开与对颌牙接触。术后3～5个月,金合金烤瓷冠完成修复。对所有病例进行定期的临床和放射线检查。结果36颗种植体行烤瓷冠修复时无1颗失败,其中1颗种植体植入后导致1颗邻牙牙髓坏死,经根管治疗后天然牙和种植体均成功保留。36例患者从种植体植入开始平均随访21.3个月（12～37个月）,36颗种植体均获得成功,种植义齿龈缘与邻牙龈缘曲线协调,龈乳头充盈,美学效果理想。结论5～6 mm缺牙间隙采用Osstem MS一段式小直径种植体即刻修复种植可以取得良好的临床效果。