Digital slot-scan charge-coupled device radiography versus AMBER and Bucky screen-film radiography for detection of simulated nodules and interstitial disease in a chest phantom

PURPOSE: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of full-field slot-scan charge-coupled device (CCD)-based digital radiography in the detection of simulated chest diseases in clinical conditions versus that of two screen-film techniques: advanced multiple beam equalization radiography (AMBER) and Bucky radiography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Simulated nodules and interstitial nodular and interstitial linear lesions were attached onto an anthropomorphic chest phantom. One hundred sixty-eight lesions were distributed over 25 configurations. A posteroanterior chest radiograph of each configuration was obtained with each technique. The images were presented to six observers. Each lesion was assigned one of two outcome scores: "detected" or "not detected." False-positive readings were evaluated. Differences between the imaging methods were analyzed by using a semiparametric logistic regression model. RESULTS: For simulated nodules and interstitial linear disease, no statistically significant difference was found in diagnostic performance between CCD digital radiography and AMBER. The detection of simulated interstitial nodular disease was better with CCD digital radiography than with AMBER: Sensitivity was 71% (77 of 108 interstitial nodular lesions) with CCD digital radiography but was 56% (60 of 108 lesions) with AMBER (P =.041). Better results for the detection of all lesion types in the mediastinum were observed with CCD digital radiography than with Bucky screen-film radiography: Sensitivity was 45% (227 of 504 total simulated lesions) with CCD digital radiography but was 24% (119 of 504 lesions) with Bucky radiography (P <.001). There were fewer false-positive observations with CCD digital radiography (35 [5.7%] of 609 observations) than with Bucky radiography (47 [9.5%] of 497 observations; P =.012). CONCLUSION: Differences were in favor of the full-field slot-scan CCD digital radiographic technique. This technique provides a digital alternative to AMBER and Bucky screen-film radiography.     

Contrast-detail evaluation and dose assessment of eight digital chest radiography systems in clinical practice

The purpose of this study was to assess contrast-detail performance and effective dose of eight different digital chest radiography systems. Digital chest radiography systems from different manufacturers were included: one storage phosphor system, one selenium-coated drum system, and six direct readout systems including four thin-film transistor (TFT) systems and two charge-coupled device (CCD) systems. For measuring image quality, a contrast-detail test object was used in combination with a phantom that simulates the primary and scatter transmission through lung fields (LucAl). Six observers judged phantom images of each modality by soft-copy reading in a four-alternative-forced-choice experiment. The entrance dose was also measured, and the effective dose was calculated for an average patient. Contrast-detail curves were constructed from the observer data. The blocked two-way ANOVA test was used for statistical analysis. Significant difference in contrast-detail performance was found between the systems. Best contrast-detail performance was shown by a CCD system with slot-scan technology, and the selenium-coated drum system was compared to the other six systems (p values 0.003). Calculated effective dose varied between 0.010 mSv and 0.032 mSv. Significant differences in contrast-detail performance and effective dose levels were found between different digital chest radiography systems in clinical practice.     

Digital chest radiography with a solid-state flat-panel x-ray detector: contrast-detail evaluation with processed images printed on film hard copy

PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare human observer performance in a contrast-detail test by using postprocessed hard-copy images from a digital chest radiography system and conventional screen-film radiographs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The digital radiography system is based on a large-area flat-panel x-ray detector with a structured cesium iodide scintillator layer and an amorphous silicon thin-film transistor array for image readout. Images of a contrast-detail phantom were acquired at two exposure levels by using two standard thoracic screen-film systems and the digital system at matched dose. By using images of the phantom processed with standard chest image postprocessing techniques, a four-alternative forced-choice observer perception study was performed, and the number of detectable test signals (disk-shaped objects 0.3-4.0 mm in diameter) was determined for each image type. RESULTS: On average, observers detected more test signals on digital images than on screen-film radiographs at all diameters up to 2.0 mm and an equivalent number at larger diameters. Test signals with lower inherent subject contrast were detected more readily on digital images than on screen-film images, even when x-ray exposure levels for the digital system were reduced by 20%. CONCLUSION: Observer performance in a contrast-detail detection task can be improved by using images acquired with the flat-panel digital chest radiography system as compared with those acquired with state-of-the-art screen-film combinations.     

Interobserver agreement and performance score comparison in quality control using a breast phantom: screen-film mammography vs computed radiography

Our objective was to evaluate interobserver agreement and to compare the performance score in quality control of screen-film mammography and computed radiography (CR) using a breast phantom. Eleven radiologists interpreted a breast phantom image (CIRS model X) by four viewing methods: (a) original screen-film; (b) soft-copy reading of the digitized film image; (c) hard-copy reading of CR using an imaging plate; and (d) soft-copy reading of CR. For the soft-copy reading, a 17-in. CRT monitor (1024x1536x8 bits) was used. The phantom image was evaluated using a scoring system outlined in the instruction manual, and observers judged each object using a three-point rating scale: (a) clearly seen; (b) barely seen; and (c) not seen. For statistical analysis, the kappa statistic was employed. For "mass" depiction, interobserver agreement using CR was significantly lower than when using screen-film ( p<0.05). There was no significant difference in the kappa value for detecting "microcalcification"; however, the performance score of "microcalcification" on CR hard-copy was significantly lower than on the other three viewing methods ( p<0.05). Viewing methods (film or CR, soft-copy or hard-copy) could affect how the phantom image is judged. Paying special attention to viewing conditions is recommended for quality control of CR mammograms.     

Neonatal chest computed radiography: image processing and optimal image display

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine soft-copy image display preferences of brightness, latitude, and detail contrast for neonatal chest computed radiography to establish a baseline for future work on low-dose imaging. CONCLUSION: Observers preferred brighter images with higher detail contrast and narrow to middle latitude for soft-copy display compared with the typical screen-film hard-copy appearance. Future research on low-dose neonatal chest imaging will be facilitated by an understanding of optimal soft-copy image display.     

Hard-copy versus soft-copy image reading for detection of ureteral stones on abdominal radiography

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the usefulness of soft-copy images displayed on a cathode ray tube (CRT) with hard-copy images (film images) for detecting ureteral stones on abdominal radiography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five radiologists read images from 50 cases of ureteral stones and 50 normal cases diagnosed on the basis of intravenous urography and CT. For hard-copy reading, 10-bit images at 3,520x4,280 pixels obtained by computed radiography were printed on 14x17-inch films. For soft-copy reading, 8-bit images were displayed on a 17-inch monochrome monitor at 1,024x1,280 pixels. The study items were area under receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve (Az), ureteral stone detection sensitivity and specificity, and reading time. RESULTS: For soft-copy and hard-copy images, the average Az values were 0.855 and 0.851, sensitivity was 62.8% and 62%, and specificity was 70.8% and 62.4%, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between these values. Reading time was 106.6 min for soft-copy images, significantly longer than the 71.2 min for hard-copy images (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Although soft-copy image reading time was longer than hard-copy image reading time, the ability to diagnose ureteral stones on abdominal radiography did not differ for soft- and hard-copy images.     

Advanced multiple-beam equalization radiography in chest radiology: a simulated nodule detection study

To evaluate the efficacy of AMBER, a multiple-beam equalization system for chest radiography, the authors performed a nodule detection study using an anthropomorphic chest phantom. AMBER and conventional images were compared. The images were read by four observers, and analysis was done by means of modified receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves (free ROC curves [FROC]). The results of the FROC analysis show a significant increase in the detectability of nodules (P less than .001) projected over the mediastinum with the use of AMBER. No significant difference between AMBER and conventional images was noted in detectability of nodules projected over the lung.     

Digital radiography of scoliosis with a scanning method: initial evaluation

PURPOSE: To evaluate the radiation dose, image quality, and Cobb angle measurements obtained with a digital scanning method of scoliosis radiography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Multiple images were reconstructed into one image at a workstation. A low-dose alternative was to use digital pulsed fluoroscopy. Dose measurements were performed with thermoluminescent dosimeters in an Alderson phantom. At the same time, kerma area-product values were recorded. A Monte Carlo dose calculation also was performed. Image quality was evaluated with a contrast-detail phantom and visual grading system. Angle measurements were evaluated with an angle phantom and measurements obtained on patient images. RESULTS: The effective radiation dose was 0.087 mSv for screen-film imaging, 0.16 mSv for digital exposure imaging, and 0.017 mSv for digital fluoroscopy; the corresponding kerma area-product values were 0.43, 0.87, and 0.097 Gy. cm(2), respectively. The image quality of the digital exposure and screen-film images was about equal at visual grading, whereas fluoroscopy had lower image quality. The angle phantom had lower angle values with digital fluoroscopy, although the difference in measured angles was less than 0.5 degrees. The patient images showed no difference in angles. CONCLUSION: The described digital scanning method has acceptable image quality and adequate accuracy in angle measurements. The radiation dose required for digital exposure imaging is higher than that required for screen-film imaging, but that required for digital fluoroscopy is much lower.     

Optimization of the chest exposure condition with a contrast-detail phantom: evaluation of the flat-panel versus computed radiography systems

In this study, we evaluated the performance of a digital chest imaging system using a contrast-detail (C-D) phantom. In the initial step, 76 sample images of the C-D phantom were produced by changing the doses from 0.5, 0.75, 1.0, 1.25, 1.5, to 2.0 times the dose for a screen-film (S/F) system. The sample images were analyzed by five radiological technologists and two medical physicists, and the image quality figure (IQF) was determined. The quality of each image was examined, and appropriate doses were determined from the calculated IQF to obtain the same image quality for other digital chest imaging systems. The method of determining IQF from C-D phantom analysis was very useful for comparing image quality and determining radiographic techniques.     

AMBER and conventional chest radiography: comparison of radiation dose and image quality.

The authors compared the radiation dose to the patient and the image quality in advanced multiple-beam equalization radiography (AMBER) with those in conventional chest radiography. Organ doses were estimated for an anthropomorphic phantom from measurements with thermoluminescence dosimeters. These measurements were supplemented with area-air kerma products obtained during chest examinations of 223 patients. Image quality was determined by means of a contrast-detail image evaluation test. An improvement in image quality in regions of high absorption and an increased dose to the patient were found for the AMBER technique compared with the conventional technique. However, for both techniques, the radiation exposure was relatively low compared with other reported values of patient dose during chest radiography. The estimated effective dose for an average-size patient during chest radiography with posteroanterior and lateral projections is 0.085 mSv for the conventional and 0.14 mSv for the AMBER technique.     

Threshold perception performance with computed and screen-film radiography: implications for chest radiography.

Images of a phantom obtained with computed radiography and standard screen-film imaging were compared to evaluate observer threshold perception performance with a modified contrast-detail technique. Optimum exposure necessary for performance with the imaging plate technique to match that with screen-film techniques was determined, as was comparative performance with variation in kilovoltages, plate type, spatial enhancement, and hard-copy interpolation method. It was found that computed radiography necessitates about 75%-100% more exposure than screen-film radiography to optimally match performance with Ortho-C film with Lanex regular or medium screens (Eastman Kodak, Rochester, NY) for detection of objects 0.05-2.0 cm in diameter. However, only minimal loss of detection performance (approximately 10% overall) was experienced if standard screen-film exposures were used with computed radiography. Little change in observer performance was found with variation in plate type, spatial enhancement, or method of hard-copy interpolation. However, perception performance with computed radiographic images was better at lower kilovoltages.     

Clinical evaluation of digital radiography based on a large-area cesium iodide-amorphous silicon flat-panel detector compared with screen-film radiography for skeletal system and abdomen

The aim of this clinical study was to compare the image quality of digital radiography using the new digital Bucky system based on a flat-panel detector with that of a conventional screen-film system for the skeletal structure and the abdomen. Fifty patients were examined using digital radiography with a flat-panel detector and screen-film systems, 25 for the skeletal structures and 25 for the abdomen. Six radiologists judged each paired image acquired under the same exposure parameters concerning three observation items for the bone and six items for the abdomen. Digital radiographic images for the bone were evaluated to be similar to screen-film images at the mean of 42.2%, to be superior at 50.2%, and to be inferior at 7.6%. Digital radiographic images for the abdomen were judged to be similar to screen-film images at the mean of 43.4%, superior at 52.4%, and inferior at 4.2%; thus, digital radiographic images were estimated to be either similar as or superior to screen-film images at over 92% for the bone and abdomen. On the statistical analysis, digital radiographic images were also judged to be preferred significantly in the most items for the bone and abdomen. In conclusion, the image quality of digital radiography with a flat-panel detector was superior to that of a screen-film system under the same exposure parameters, suggesting that dose reduction is possible with digital radiography.     

Image quality and detection performance of a direct digital radiography system

The physical characteristics of a direct amorphous Selenium (a-Se) digital fluoroscopy and radiography system were investigated. Pre-sampled modulation transfer functions (MTF) were measured using a slit method. Noise power spectra were determined for different input exposures by fast Fourier transform of uniformly exposed samples. The MTFs of direct digital radiography systems showed significantly higher values than those of indirect digital radiography and screen-film systems. The direct digital radiography systems showed higher noise levels compared with those of indirect systems under roughly the same exposure conditions. Contrast-detail analysis was performed to compare detection by direct digital radiography systems with that of the screen-film (FUJI HG-M2/UR2) systems. The average contrast-detail curves of digital and film images were obtained from the results of observation. Image quality figures (IQF) were also calculated from the individual observer performance tests. The results indicated that digital contrast-detail curves and IQF are, on average, are equal those of the screen-film system.     

Contrast-detail phantom study for x-ray spectrum optimization regarding chest radiography using a cesium iodide-amorphous silicon flat-panel detector

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study evaluating a cesium iodide-amorphous silicon-based flat-panel detector was to optimize the x-ray spectrum for chest radiography combining excellent contrast-detail visibility with reduced patient exposure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A Lucite plate with 36 drilled holes of varying diameter and depth was used as contrast-detail phantom. For 3 scatter body thicknesses (7.5 cm, 12.5 cm, 21.5 cm Lucite) images were obtained at 113 kVp, 117 kVp, and 125 kVp with additional copper filter of 0.2 and 0.3 mm, respectively. For each setting, radiographs acquired with 125 kVp and no copper filter were taken as standard of reference. On soft-copy displays, 3 observers blinded to the exposure technique evaluated the detectability of each aperture in each image according to a 5-point scale. The number of points given to all 36 holes per image was added. The scores of images acquired with filtration were compared with the standard images by means of a multivariate analysis of variance. Radiation burden was approximated by referring to the entrance dose and calculated using Monte Carlo method. RESULTS: All 6 evaluated x-ray spectra resulted in a statistically equivalent contrast-detail performance when compared with the standard of reference. The combination 125 kVp with 0.3 mm copper was most favorable in terms of dose reduction (approximately 33%). CONCLUSION: Within the constraints of the presented contrast-detail phantom study simulating chest radiography, the CsI/a-Si system enables an addition of up to 0.3 mm copper filtration without the need for compensatory reduction of the tube voltage for providing constant image quality. Beam filtration reduces radiation burden by about 33%.     

Hard-copy versus soft-copy with and without simple image manipulation for detection of pulmonary nodules and masses

Purpose: To compare interpretation performance on soft-copy presentations, with and without simple image manipulation, and on unmodified hard-copy presentations with regard to detection of pulmonary nodules and masses.Material and Methods: Fifty chest digital radiograph combinations of patients with a total of 60 nodules, 32 of which were 2.0 cm in diameter, were selected for the study. Three readers evaluated three separate image formats: unmodified hard- and soft-copies, and soft-copies with simple image manipulation of lung and mediastinum window settings, and zooming. The screen display was 1600×1200 pixels with 8 bits/pixel.Results: The sensitivity, accuracy, detectability, and Az value of the soft-copy systems were clearly inferior to hard-copy evaluation. The mean Az values were 0.921 for unmodified hard-copy, 0.820 for image-manipulated soft-copy, and 0.781 for unmodified soft-copy.Conclusion: Soft-copy interpretations were not as sensitive in detecting pulmonary nodules and masses as hard-copy evaluation.     

数字X线摄影系统中低剂量应用的探讨

目的 通过数字X线摄影系统（DR）在胸部摄影检查中的应用评价DR的低剂量的优越性。方法 利用CDRAD 2.0低对比细节体模评价计算机X线摄影（CR）和DR的影像质量和表面空气吸收剂量（ESD）关系,分别利用两个系统（DR使用ESD约为CR的1/3）得到成人胸部30幅影像。由6位影像科医生来评价以上两者的影像系统对于肩胛骨内侧边缘等胸部结构的清晰程度。结果 CR影像和减少ESD的DR影像在影像诊断质量上差异没有统计学意义（P＞0.05）。结论 DR的较好的分辨率和低噪声特性,以及高DQE有助于减少患者接受的辐射剂量,而不影响诊断质量。     

骨盆数字化X射线摄影曝光剂量的优化研究

目的研究直接数字化X射线摄影照射剂量与成像质量的关系，确定骨盆X射线摄影的最佳摄影条件。方法以对比度一细节体模CDRAD2．0在不同照射剂量下所获取的影像的图像质量因子IQF，进行ANOVA及SNK统计学分析，确定最佳照射条件。应用X射线摄影模拟人拍摄骨盆X射线影像，按照欧共体（CEC）图像质量标准验证最佳摄影条件与常规摄影条件下照射剂量与成像质量的差别。结果不同照射剂量条件下，对比度一细节体模影像质量因子IQF有显著性差别（P=0．0001），照射剂量大于0．61mGy时，不同剂量组间IQF差异无统计学意义。对以最佳照射条件和常规照射条件所拍摄的X射线摄影模拟人影像按照CEC标准评判，两者影像质量的差异无统计学意义。结论直接数字化X射线摄影时通过增大照射剂量可以提高影像质量，但是当曝光剂量达到足够大时，再增大曝光剂量并不能显著改善图像质量，影像质量与曝光剂量间存在一个优化剂量。标准体模骨盆X射线摄影的优化剂量为0．61mGy。     

Reduction of patient exposure by the use of digital luminescence radiography

PURPOSE: To determine the minimum acceptable exposure for an adequate image quality using digital luminescence radiography (DLR) instead of screen-film system (SFS). MATERIAL AND METHODS: The impact of different physical and technical parameters on image quality and exposure was evaluated by obtaining radiographs of a test phantom. Conventional and digital radiographs of a humanoid phantom, an anatomical preparation or an animal were obtained using variable mAs. The image quality was rated by eight experienced radiologists using clinical criteria of image quality. The image quality evaluation was analysed using graphs. RESULTS: The exposure could be reduced by 60% for skull radiographs, 57% for abdominal radiographs, and 25% for chest radiographs of premature infants when using DLR instead of conventional SFS. CONCLUSION: DLR provides adequate image quality with reasonably low exposure.     

两种平板探测器X线摄影系统的成像剂量与成像质量的比较研究

目的 定量分析、比较非晶硅平板探测器X射线摄影系统与非晶硒平板探测器X射线摄影系统在不同成像剂量条件下成像质量的差别。方法 以非晶硅平板探测器系统和非晶硒平板探测器系统分别摄取对比度-细节体模CDRAD2.0在相近曝光剂量条件下的X射线影像,由4位独立观察者分别阅读影像,并计算所对应的曝光剂量下图像质量因子（image quality figure,IQF）,应用ANOVA分析两成像系统对比度及细节检测能力。使用X射线摄影统计学体模（TRG）测量两系统在不同曝光剂量条件下操作者特性曲线（receive operating characteristics,ROC）,应用Wilcoxon检验分析、比较两种成像技术的影像信息检测能力的差别。结果 在低曝光剂量条件下,两系统CDRAD体模影像IQF值及ROC曲线AZ值差别有显著意义,在对比度、组织细节检测能力上非晶硅平板探测器系统优于非晶硒平板探测器系统。在高曝光剂量条件下,两系统差异无统计学意义。结论 在低曝光剂量条件下,成像质量非晶硅平板探测器系统优于非晶硒系统。在获得相同的影像质量的前提下,使用前者进行X射线摄影可以降低被检者受照剂量。     

Digital chest radiography with a large image intensifier. An ROC study with an anthropomorphic phantom

The diagnostic performance of two systems for chest radiography was studied. One system was based on a large image intensifier, the other was a conventional film-screen system. The images from the image intensifier were studied either on a digital TV screen or on 100 mm photofluorograms. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed on images of an anthropomorphic chest phantom. Low-contrast MMAP (methyl methacrylate polymer) nodules and simulated vessels were positioned over the parenchymal and the mediastinal region of the phantom. Five observers assessed the digital monitor images, photofluorograms, and conventional full-size radiograms. The results showed a significantly superior detectability for the full-size radiograms over the digital monitor images both in the parenchyma and in the mediastinum. No significant difference was found between photofluorograms and digital images.