Sequence effect of docetaxel and carboplatin on toxicity, tumor response and pharmacokinetics in non-small-cell lung cancer patients: a phase I study of two sequences

Purpose To investigate sequence effects on toxicity, tumor response and pharmacokinetics of docetaxel and carboplatin, together with a determination of the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose for each schedule.Patients and methods A total of 46 chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer were randomized to receive docetaxel before (schedule A) or after (schedule B) carboplatin. The dose levels studied were [docetaxel (mg/m²)/carboplatin (mg×min/ml)] 50/5, 60/5, 60/6, 60/7, and 70/6. Treatment cycles were repeated every 3 or 4 weeks unless disease progression or undue toxicity occurred.Results Of the 46 patients, 44 were assessable for toxicity and received a total of 84 cycles. The major dose-limiting toxicity was neutropenia. When the docetaxel dose was 60 mg/m², the carboplatin MTD was deemed to be AUC 7 in both schedules. When the docetaxel dose was escalated to 70 mg/m², the carboplatin MTD was reached in schedule A, and the dose-limiting toxicity was not observed in schedule B. Tumor response was observed in 4 of 22 patients (18%) with schedule A and 8 of 19 (42%) with schedule B. Clearances of both drugs were not affected by sequence: 111.2±26.8 ml/min and 107.8±29.0 ml/min for carboplatin (P=0.69), and 26.7±8.3 l/h and 22.8±7.0 l/h for docetaxel (P=0.19) in schedules A and B, respectively.Conclusions Carboplatin AUC 6 followed by docetaxel 70 mg/m² was a favorable regimen for phase II study because of likely lower toxicity and a potentially higher response rate than the reverse sequence schedule. The mechanism of the sequence effects on toxicity and tumor response could not be explained by the pharmacokinetic interactions.Supported by grants from the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, and the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan.     

Optimal doses of paclitaxel and carboplatin combination chemotherapy for ovarian cancer: a phase I modified continual reassessment method study

Background. A multicenter, phase I study of combination therapy with paclitaxel and carboplatin for epithelial ovarian cancer was conducted to determine the safety and recommended dosages for Japanese women. Methods. Paclitaxel was administered intravenously over a 3-h period, followed by carboplatin administered intravenously over a 1.5-h period. A modified continual reassessment method (mCRM) was used in two treatment arms to establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended doses of the combination. In group A, the dose of paclitaxel (175 mg/m²) was constant and the dose of carboplatin was increased from 4 to 7 in terms of the target area under the plasma concentration-versus-time curve (AUC). In group B, the dose of carboplatin was constant (AUC 6) and paclitaxel was administered at two dose levels (160 and 175 mg/m²). In both groups, the carboplatin dose was limited to a maximum of 800 mg/body for each administration. Results. Because the calculated probability of toxicity was greatest at a dose of paclitaxel 175 mg/m² and carboplatin AUC 7, this dose was designated the MTD in group A. Based on this result, treatment in group B was initiated at doses of paclitaxel of 160 mg/m² and carboplatin AUC 6. While the dose of paclitaxel was escalated to 175 mg/m², the safety of the combination was confirmed. The most frequent adverse effect was neutropenia, which resolved promptly with the appropriate use of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF). No other severe hematologic or nonhematologic toxicities were observed. Conclusions. Our study demonstrated that the recommended dose for this combination regimen should be paclitaxel 175 mg/m² plus carboplatin AUC 6 (maximum dose, 800 mg/body). Received: March 5, 2001 / Accepted: September 6, 2001     

Phase I trial of combination chemotherapy with docetaxel,cisplatin and S-1 (TPS) in patients with locally advanced or recurrent/metastatic head and neck cancer

Background: We investigated the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of combination therapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and S-1 (TPS) in patients with locally advanced or recurrent/metastatic head and neck cancer (HNC).Patients and methods: Treatment consisted of docetaxel (Taxotere) at doses of 50, 60, and 70 mg/m²; cisplatin at 70 mg·m²/day on day 1; and S-1 twice daily on days 1–14 at doses of 40, 60, and 80 mg·m²/day, repeated every 3 or 4 weeks.Results: Forty patients were enrolled. MTD was not reached until level 4. Subjects at expanded dose were limited to patients with locally advanced disease. Two dose-limiting toxic effects (DLTs) were observed at dose level 5 (TPS: 70/70/80 mg·m²/day, every 3 weeks), namely one grade 3 infection and one grade 3 hyperbilirubinemia, establishing this as the MTD. Of 12 patients treated at dose level 6 (TPS: 70/70/60 mg·m²/day, every 3 weeks), 2 DLTs were seen. Six achieved a complete response and 22 a partial response, giving a response rate of 70%.Conclusions: TPS was well tolerated. The recommended phase II dose as induction chemotherapy for locally advanced HNC was determined as 70/70/60 mg·m²/day every 3 weeks. Antitumor activity was highly promising and warrants further investigation.     

A phase I study of larotaxel (XRP9881) administered in combination with carboplatin in chemotherapy-naïve patients with stage IIIB or stage IV non-small cell lung cancer

Purpose

This primary objective of this phase I dose-escalation study was to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose limiting toxicity (DLT) of larotaxel administered in combination with carboplatin in chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

Eighteen patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC, in cohorts of three to six evaluable patients, were to receive every 3 weeks: larotaxel beginning at 45 mg/m² administered as a 1-h infusion, followed after 30 min by carboplatin (area under the concentration–time curve (AUC) = 6 mg/mL × min, later AUC = 5) as a 1-h infusion. Dose escalation of larotaxel up to 90 mg/m² was permitted according to DLT occurrence. Patients received ondansetron as prophylactic anti-emetic premedication.

Results

In view of the toxicity encountered, the carboplatin dose was decreased for the later part of the study to AUC = 5 mg/mL × min. Eight of 18 treated patients experienced DLTs in the first cycle, including neutropenia and associated complications, diarrhea and fatigue. The MTD of the combination was defined as larotaxel 60 mg/m² with a carboplatin AUC of 6 mg/mL × min. Neutropenia, reported at grade 3/4 in 15/18 patients (83%), was the most common severe adverse event, reaching grade 4 in 14 patients (78%). Eleven patients (61%) experienced grade 3/4 non-hematological toxicity, predominantly dehydration, fatigue, infection, nausea and vomiting. One patient (6%) achieved a partial response and 11 (61%) had stable disease.

Conclusions

The combination of larotaxel and carboplatin is feasible and shows modest activity in chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced/metastatic NSCLC. The principal toxicity was grade 3/4 neutropenia.     

A phase I trial of carboplatin and etoposide for elderly (≥75 year-old) patients with small-cell lung cancer

Purpose: The combination of carboplatin and etoposide is currently considered the most appropriate regimen for treating elderly patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Previous reports on elderly patients, 70 years or older, found that the recommended dose was close to that of younger patients. Then, we conducted a phase I study of carboplatin and etoposide in elderly patients, 75 years or older, with SCLC. This study aimed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Methods: Twenty-six patients fulfilling the eligibility criteria, chemotherapy-naive, performance status (PS) of 0–2, age ≥75, and adequate organ functions were enrolled. Patients’ characteristics were: male/female=21/5; PS 0/1/2=9/11/6; median age (range)=78 (75–82); and limited/extensive stage=16/10. The patients intravenously received carboplatin with a target AUC of 4 or 5 mg min/ml (Chatelut formula) on day 1 and etoposide at 80–120 mg/m² on days 1, 2 and 3. Therapy was repeated four times in every 4 weeks. Results: The MTD of carboplatin/etoposide was AUC=5/80, 4/110, and 4/120. The DLTs were thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, leukopenia, and febrile neutropenia. Overall, grade 4 thrombocytopenia, neutropenia (≥4 days), leukopenia (≥4 days), and febrile neutropenia occurred in 27, 20, 7, and 13% of cases at MTD levels, respectively, and 0% at other levels. Twenty of 26 patients showed objective responses (2CR, 18PR; RR=77%). Conclusion: A dose of carboplatin of AUC=4 and etoposide of 100 mg/m² was recommended in this regimen.The authors indicated no potential conflicts of interest.     

Phase I study of second-line chemotherapy with docetaxel and carboplatin in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE: Docetaxel and carboplatin have a broad spectrum of antitumor activity. We conducted a phase I study of docetaxel and carboplatin as second-line chemotherapy in previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aimed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the dose-limiting toxicities in this second-line combination chemotherapy. METHODS: Patients with advanced NSCLC were treated with escalating docetaxel doses in combination with a fixed-target area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of 5 mg min/ml of carboplatin on day 1 of a 3-4-week cycle. The carboplatin dose was determined by multiplying the AUC by the clearance predicted using the Chatelut formula. The docetaxel dose was escalated from 40 mg/m2 to the MTD by 10 mg/m2 increments. RESULTS: A total of 16 patients previously treated with anticancer drugs were enrolled through three dose levels (40, 50 and 60 mg/m2 of docetaxel). All patients were assessable for toxicity and response. The MTD was docetaxel 60 mg/m2 with a carboplatin target AUC of 5 mg min/ml, and the dose-limiting toxicities in two of four patients were neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. Overall, neutropenia and thrombocytopenia of grade 3/4 occurred in eight patients (50%) and three patients (19%), respectively. Four patients (25%) and two patients (13%) experienced both grade 1 diarrhea and dermatitis, respectively. Allergic reactions, fluid retention, pneumonitis, neurotoxicity and mucositis were not observed. Of 16 patients, 5 showed an objective response (response rate 31%; 95% CI 14-56%). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of docetaxel and carboplatin is a feasible and well-tolerated second-line chemotherapy regimen in the treatment of NSCLC. Docetaxel 50 mg/m2 under the carboplatin target AUC of 5 mg x min/ml using the Chatelut formula was the recommended dose for phase II study.     

Docetaxel in combination with carboplatin for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma: a multicentre phase I study

Docetaxel and carboplatin have shown in vitro and in vivo activity against non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A phase I study was conducted in order to determine the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and the maximum tolerated doses (MTDs) of their combination. Chemotherapy-na?ve patients with stage IIIB and IV NSCLC, age<75 years old, performance status (WHO) 0-2, with adequate bone marrow, renal, liver and cardiac function, were treated with docetaxel and carboplatin. Docetaxel was given at escalated doses starting from 70 mg/m(2) with increments of 10 mg/m(2) followed by carboplatin also administered at escalated doses starting from AUC 5 to 7 AUC (mg/ml. min); the regimen was administered every 3 weeks. No colony-stimulating factor or intrapatient escalation was allowed. The toxicity of the regimen was assessed during the first chemotherapy cycle. 35 enrolled patients received a total of 114 chemotherapy cycles (median 3 cycles/patient; range: 1-8). All patients were assessable for toxicity. Neutropenia was the main dose-limiting toxicity of the regimen; overall, grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in 16 (14%) cycles; six (5%) neutropenic episodes were complicated with fever but there was no septic death. Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia was uncommon (two cycles; 2%). Grade 3/4 diarrhoea occurred in 5 (14%) patients whilst neurotoxicity, fatigue and mucositis were extremely uncommon. Two MTDs were defined: the MTD(1) was docetaxel 80 mg/m(2) and carboplatin AUC 7 mg/ml x min whilst MTD(2) was docetaxel 100 mg/m(2) and carboplatin AUC 6 mg/ml x min. The combination of docetaxel and carboplatin is a feasible and well-tolerated outpatient regimen for the treatment of patients with locally advanced and metastatic NSCLC. This regimen merits further investigation in phase II trials.     

Phase I/II dose escalation study of docetaxel and carboplatin combination supported with amifostine and GM-CSF in patients with incomplete response following docetaxel chemo-radiotherapy: additional chemotherapy enhances regression of residual cancer

Taxanes have been shown to interact with anti-apoptotic proteins. In the present study we investigated whether the addition of taxane in combination with DNA damaging drugs can further enhance tumor shrinkage in cases with incomplete response to radiotherapy. Since the dose of docetaxel in combination with carboplatin is not known, the above hypothesis was tested in the context of a dose escalation phase I study. Twenty-eight patients with locally advanced chest or pelvic tumors, showing residual disease on CT scans performed 40 d following docetaxel radio-chemotherapy, were recruited in a dose escalation protocol of docetaxel/carboplatin supported with amifostine and GM-CSF. The starting dose of docetaxel was 40 mg/m² every 2 weeks. Carboplatin dose was calculated using the Calvert formula and was escalated in cohorts of 4 patients (starting dose AUC2 every two weeks; AUC0.5 increments up to AUC3). Thereafter the docetaxel dose was increased to 50 and 60 mg/m², while carboplatin was escalated (by AUC0.5 increments) starting from AUC3 and AUC4 respectively. Amifostine (600 mg/m²) was administered i.v. before carboplatin and GM-CSF (480μg) was injected s.c. on days 5, 6 and 10, 11 of each cycle. Six cycles were given and response was assessed 2 weeks after the end of chemotherapy. None out of four patients treated in the 6th dose level cohort (50mg/m² of docetaxel and AUC4 of carboplatin every 2 weeks) showed any grade 2–4 hematologic toxicity. Mild non-hematologic toxicity such as neuropathy, leg edema, pleural effusion, pyrexia, alopecia grade 2 and hypersensitivity was observed in 4–12% of patients. Out of four patients treated in a 7th cohort (docetaxel 60mg/m² and carboplatin AUC4), one developed grade IV neutropenia and two developed grade 3 severe asthenia requiring treatment delay for 2 weeks. Out of 11 patients with PR following docetaxel radio-chemotherapy, 7 (63%) showed CR after docetaxel/carboplatin additional chemotherapy. Eight out of 17 patients with MR following docetaxel radio-chemotherapy showed PR (47%) and one showed CR (6%) after additional chemotherapy. High dose combined docetaxel (50 mg/m²) and carboplatin (AUC4) chemotherapy can be safely administered on a two-weekly basis if supported with amifostine and GM-CSF. Such an additional therapy may be important in patients with incomplete response after chemo-RT. Broad spectrum cytoprotection with amifostine and GM-CSF may also contribute to the reduction of incidence of neurosensory reactions and asthenia in patients treated with taxanes.     

Phase I trial of dose escalation of capecitabine combined with fixed docetaxel in previously treated patients with non-small cell lung cancer

Objective

Capecitabine combined with docetaxel have demonstrated antitumor synergy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Due to absence of phase I trial in China, we conducted this study to define the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of capecitabine with fixed docetaxel for Chinese patients with previously treated NSCLC.

Methods

Previously treated patients with NSCLC were entered into this study. Escalating doses of capecitabine with fixed docetaxel were administered in a modified Fibonacci sequence. The initial doses were capecitabine 625 mg/m², bid, on days d5?Cd18, and docetaxel 30 mg/m² on days 1 and 8, respectively. The regimen was repeated every 21 days. If no dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was observed, the next dose level was applied. The procedures were repeated until DLT appeared. The MTD was declared to be one dose level below the level at which DLT appeared.

Results

Eighteen patients received 67 cycles at capecitabine of level I (1250 mg/m², divided into 625 mg/m², bid) and level II (1500 mg/m², 750 mg/m², bid). The most common toxicities were neutropenia, hand and feet syndrome, fatigue and nausea. Eight DLTs occurred in 5 patients in the whole group, including 1 DLT in dose level I and 7 DLTs in dose level 2. Since 4 of 6 patients in level II experienced DLTs, we declared thus level I was MTD.

Conclusion

MTD of our phase I trial was capecitabine of 1250 mg/m²/d combined with docetaxel of 30 mg/m²/wk. This combination regimen was well tolerated for previously treated patients with NSCLC. The efficacy of this schedule is currently being further evaluated in a prospective phase II trial.     

A phase I trial of oxaliplatin in combination with docetaxel in patients with advanced solid tumors

The primary objective of this trial was to establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of oxaliplatin 130 mg/m² preceded by escalating doses of docetaxel 60 mg/m² (75, 90, 100 mg/m²) administered every 3 weeks. A total of 11 patients were entered; 10 evaluable for response: 4 stable disease (liver, ovary and esophagus) and 1 partial remission (esophagus). At dose level 1, there was 1 dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) (grade 3 allergic reaction). At dose level 2, there were 3 DLTs (3 grade 4 neutropenia, grade 3 gastritis, diarrhea, hypophosphatemia, neuro-mood). The MTD is docetaxel 60 mg/m² with oxaliplatin 130 mg/m².     

A phase I, open-label dose-escalation study of continuous treatment with BIBF 1120 in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin as first-line treatment in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

BackgroundBIBF 1120 is an oral potent inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor, fibroblast growth factor receptor and platelet-derived growth factor receptor, the three key receptor families involved in angiogenesis. This phase I, open-label dose-escalation study investigated BIBF 1120 combined with paclitaxel (Taxol) and carboplatin in first-line patients with advanced (IIIB/IV) non-small-cell lung cancer.Patients and methodsPatients received BIBF 1120 (starting dose 50 mg b.i.d.) on days 2–21 and paclitaxel (200 mg/m²) and carboplatin [area under curve (AUC) = 6 mg/ml/min] on day 1 of each 21-day cycle. Primary end points were safety and BIBF 1120 maximum tolerated dose (MTD) in this combination. Pharmacokinetics (PK) profiles were evaluated.ResultsTwenty-six patients were treated (BIBF 1120 50–250 mg b.i.d.). BIBF 1120 MTD was 200 mg b.i.d. in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin. Six dose-limiting toxicity events occurred during treatment cycle 1 (liver enzyme elevations, thrombocytopenia, abdominal pain, and rash). Best responses included 7 confirmed partial responses (26.9 % ); 10 patients had stable disease. BIBF 1120 200 mg b.i.d. had no clinically relevant influence on the PK of paclitaxel 200 mg/m² and carboplatin AUC 6 mg/ml/min and vice versa.ConclusionsBIBF 1120 MTD was 200 mg b.i.d when given with paclitaxel and carboplatin; this combination demonstrated an acceptable safety profile. No relevant changes in PK parameters of the backbone chemotherapeutic agents or BIBF 1120 were observed.     

卡培他滨二线治疗非小细胞肺癌的剂量递增研究

目的 探讨卡培他滨(capecitabine,CAPE)联合多西紫杉醇(docetaxel,TXT)二线治疗非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)时卡培他滨的最大耐受剂量(maximum-tolerated dose,MTD).方法 应用改良的Fibonacci法给予复治的NSCLC患者递增剂量的CAPE联合固定剂量TXT化疗,剂量Ⅰ(625 mg/m2,每天2次)和剂量Ⅱ(7 50 mg/m2,每天2次),两组1 8例患者共接受了67周期化疗.起始剂量为CAPE625 mg/m2,每天2次,d5～d18,TXT 30 mg/m2,d1,d8,每21天重复.如果没有剂量限制性毒性(dose limiting toxicity,DLT)出现,则升至下一剂量组,直至出现DLT.MTD定义为DLT出现的剂量水平的低一剂量.结果 主要的不良反应为粒细胞减少症、手足综合征、乏力和恶心.全组共5例发生8个DLT,剂量Ⅰ组1个(1例患者),剂量Ⅱ组7个(4例患者).由于在剂量Ⅱ组6例患者中4例出现了DLT,根据定义笔者确定剂量T为MTD.结论 此剂量递增试验的MTD是:卡培他滨1 250 mg/(m2·d)(625 mg/m2,每天2次)联合多西紫杉醇30mg/m2,d1,d8,每21天重复.复治NSCLC患者对此联合方案耐受性良好.     

Bi-weekly docetaxel in the adjuvant treatment of node-positive or high-risk breast cancer patients: phase I study of the Shiga Breast Cancer Study Group

Background  A phase I study of bi-weekly docetaxel was performed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) as well as the incidence and severity of toxicities in patients with high-risk node-negative and node-positive breast cancer. Methods  Docetaxel was administered every 14 days to postoperative breast cancer patients who were axillary lymph node-positive or considered at high-risk. After the completion of six cycles of docetaxel, all patients received epirubicin + cyclophosphamide every 21 days for four cycles. The docetaxel dose was escalated in a stepwise fashion as follows: 45, 50, 55, 60, 65, and 70 mg/m² in levels 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, respectively. Patients were treated in cohorts of three to six per group using a standard phase I study design. The MTD was considered the dose level at which three of three patients or more than three of six patients experienced dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) in the first cycle. Results  Twenty patients were enrolled and received a total of 110 cycles of chemotherapy. The MTD was not reached until level 5. Since three DLTs (grade 3 diarrhea, n = 2; grade 3 constipation, n = 1), were observed in five patients at level 6, level 6 was judged as the MTD. The recommended dose of bi-weekly docetaxel for a phase II trial is 65 mg/m². Conclusions  The MTD of bi-weekly docetaxel was 70 mg/m². Further evaluation is warranted to confirm the safety and efficacy in the treatment of early-stage breast cancer.     

Phase I Trial of Weekly Docetaxel,Total Androgen Blockade,and Image-Guided Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy for Localized High-Risk Prostate Adenocarcinoma

BackgroundThis was a phase I study to find the maximum tolerable dose (MTD) of weekly docetaxel combined with high-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT).Patients and MethodsMen with localized high-risk prostate cancer (HRPC) were treated with weekly docetaxel at 10 to 30 mg/m² concurrent with IMRT of 77.4 Gy to the prostate and 45 Gy to the seminal vesicles. ADT consisted of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) and bicalutamide beginning 2 months before and during chemoradiation. GnRHa was continued for 24 months.ResultsNineteen patients were enrolled. No dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was seen with docetaxel doses up to 25 mg/m². At the 30 mg/m² level, 2 of 4 patients experienced DLTs of both grade 3 fatigue and dyspepsia. At 41 months' median follow-up, 2 patients had died—1 from metastatic prostate cancer and the other from heart failure. Two other patients experienced biochemical failure. One patient with bladder invasion at diagnosis experienced late grade 2 urinary hesitancy 9 months after completion of radiotherapy, requiring short-term intermittent catheterization. All patients had erectile dysfunction, but no late toxicities worse than grade 2 were identified.ConclusionWeekly docetaxel may be combined with high-dose IMRT and long-term ADT up to a MTD of 25 mg/m². Acute toxicities and long-term side effects of this regimen were acceptable. Future studies evaluating the efficacy of docetaxel, ADT, and IMRT for localized HRPC should use a weekly dose of 25 mg/m² when limiting the irradiated volume to the prostate and seminal vesicles.     

A phase I study of sunitinib in combination with FOLFIRI in patients with untreated metastatic colorectal cancer

BackgroundThis study evaluated the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of sunitinib, a multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor, combined with FOLFIRI (irinotecan 180 mg/m² given over 90 min i.v. and l-leucovorin 200 mg/m² given over 120 min on day 1, followed by 5-FU 400 mg/m² bolus and then 2400 mg/m² infused over 46 h) in untreated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).Patients and methodsIn this multicentre, phase I, open-label, dose-finding trial, FOLFIRI was administered every 2 weeks. Two sunitinib regimens were explored: Schedule 4/2 (4 weeks on, 2 weeks off; 37.5 and 50 mg/day) and continuous daily dosing (CDD; 37.5 and 25 mg/day). Dose-limiting toxic toxicities (DLTs) were evaluated during weeks 1–6. Efficacy was a secondary objective.ResultsThirty-seven patients were enrolled. The 37.5 mg/day Schedule 4/2 cohort had zero of six DLTs, was expanded by 15 patients and declared the MTD. The MTD was exceeded at all other sunitinib doses and schedules; DLTs included febrile neutropenia (n = 1), grade 4 neutropenia (n = 4) and grade 3 deep vein thrombosis with grade 4 neutropenia (n = 1). At the MTD, non-haematologic grade 3/4 adverse events with a frequency of >10% were diarrhoea, vomiting and lethargy, and the objective response rate was 57.9% (95% confidence interval 33.5–79.7).ConclusionsThe MTD of sunitinib combined with FOLFIRI in chemotherapy-naive mCRC was 37.5 mg/day on Schedule 4/2. CDD of sunitinib at 37.5 or 25 mg/day plus FOLFIRI was not feasible.     

Phase I study of concurrent real-time tumor-tracking thoracic radiation therapy with paclitaxel and carboplatin in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Introduction

Although paclitaxel with carboplatin and thoracic radiotherapy has improved survival for patients with locally advanced unresectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the optimal dose of paclitaxel has not been well defined in Japan. This study was conducted to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose (RD) of paclitaxel in combination with carboplatin and concurrent real-time tumor-tracking thoracic radiation therapy (thoracic RTRT).

Patients and methods

Previously untreated patients with histologically confirmed, locally advanced unresectable NSCLC were eligible. Before treatment, gold markers were inserted into the lung and the mediastinum of all patients. RTRT comprised a total of 66 Gy at 2 Gy/fraction, 5 days/week, for 7 weeks. Patients received paclitaxel at a starting dose of 40 mg/m² followed by carboplatin at a fixed area under the curve (AUC) of 2, as a weekly regimen with RTRT. The dose of paclitaxel was escalated by 5 mg/m² per level.

Results

Eight patients with locally advanced unresectable NSCLC were enrolled and treated with two dose levels of paclitaxel (40 mg/m² and 45 mg/m²), carboplatin (AUC = 2) and RTRT. No dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed at Level 1 (paclitaxel, 40 mg/m² and carboplatin, AUC = 2). At Level 2 (paclitaxel, 45 mg/m² and carboplatin, AUC = 2), two of five patients experienced DLTs, in the form of esophagitis and discontinuation of chemotherapy more than twice. The MTD and RD of paclitaxel were thus defined as 45 mg/m² and 40 mg/m², respectively.

Conclusions

This phase I study was well tolerated and the RD of paclitaxel and carboplatin with RTRT is 40 mg/m² at AUC = 2, respectively. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the efficacy of this regimen.     

Phase I study of the novel,fully synthetic epothilone sagopilone (ZK-EPO) in patients with solid tumors

BackgroundSagopilone (ZK-EPO) is a fully synthetic microtubule-stabilizing agent that has demonstrated high antitumor activity in preclinical models. This first-in-human phase I study aimed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxic effects (DLTs) of 3-weekly sagopilone treatment.Patients and methodsA total of 52 patients with advanced solid tumors received a 30-min infusion of escalating doses of sagopilone (0.6–29.4 mg/m²) every 3 weeks. Nine additional patients were recruited to a 3-h infusion arm (16.53- or 22.0-mg/m² dose) to assess the incidence of neuropathy with prolonged infusion.ResultsThe MTD was established as 22.0 mg/m². DLTs comprised peripheral sensory neuropathy (PNP), infection, hyponatremia, diarrhea, and central ataxia. PNP was the most common grade 3 event, with a similar incidence in the 30-min and 3-h arms. Hematologic adverse events were rare and of low intensity. One confirmed partial response (PR) and one unconfirmed PR were reported in the 30-min arm, and a further unconfirmed PR was observed in the 3-h arm. Eleven patients achieved disease stabilization. Sagopilone showed high levels of tissue binding and no obvious serum accumulation in both arms.ConclusionsThese data demonstrate that sagopilone therapy is feasible and well tolerated. The recommended dose for phase II studies is 16.53 mg/m², once every 3 weeks.     

Phase I dose-finding and pharmacokinetic study of paclitaxel and carboplatin with oral valspodar in patients with advanced solid tumors.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), and pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of paclitaxel and carboplatin when administered every 3 weeks with the oral semisynthetic cyclosporine analog valspodar (PSC 833), an inhibitor of P-glycoprotein function. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-eight patients were treated with escalating doses of paclitaxel ranging from 54 to 94.5 mg/m(2) and carboplatin area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) ranging from 6 to 9 mg.min/mL, every 21 days. The dose of valspodar was fixed at 5 mg/kg every 6 hours for a total of 12 doses from day 0 to day 3. The MTD was determined for the following two groups: (1) previously treated patients, where paclitaxel and carboplatin doses were escalated; and (2) chemotherapy-na?ve patients, where paclitaxel dose was escalated and carboplatin AUC was fixed at 6 mg.min/mL. PK studies of paclitaxel and carboplatin were performed on day 1 of course 1. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients were treated with 186 courses of paclitaxel, carboplatin, and valspodar. Neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and hepatic transaminase elevations were DLTs. In previously treated patients, no DLTs occurred at the first dose level (paclitaxel 54 mg/m(2) and carboplatin AUC 6 mg.min/mL). However, one of 12, two of six, two of four, four of 11, and two of five patients experienced DLTs at doses of paclitaxel (mg/m(2))/carboplatin AUC (mg.min/mL) of 67.5/6, 81/6, 94.5/6, 67. 5/7.5, and 67.5/9, respectively. In chemotherapy-na?ve patients, one of 17 developed DLT at paclitaxel 81 mg/m(2) and carboplatin AUC 6 mg/mL.min. There was prolongation of the terminal phase of paclitaxel elimination as evidenced by an increased time that plasma paclitaxel concentration was >/= 0.05 micromol/L, ranging from 16.6 +/- 6.7 hours to 41.5 +/- 9.8 hours for paclitaxel doses of 54.5 mg/m(2) to 94.5 mg/m(2), respectively. CONCLUSION: The recommended phase II dose in chemotherapy-na?ve patients is paclitaxel 81 mg/m(2), carboplatin AUC 6 mg.min/mL, and valspodar 5 mg/kg every 6 hours. In previously treated patients, the recommended phase II dose is paclitaxel 67.5 mg/m(2), carboplatin AUC 6 mg.min/mL, and valspodar 5 mg/kg every 6 hours. The acceptable toxicity profile supports the rationale for performing disease-directed evaluations of paclitaxel, carboplatin and valspodar on the schedule evaluated in this study.     

Concurrent Chemoradiation Therapy With Docetaxel/Cisplatin Followed by Docetaxel Consolidation Therapy in Inoperable Stage IIIA/B Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Results of a Phase I Study

IntroductionDocetaxel consolidation therapy (DCT) after concurrent cisplatin/docetaxel chemoradiation therapy (CRT) produces high tumor control in non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC); toxicity is, however, considerable. We aimed to determine the maximally tolerated dose (MTD) for DCT.Patients and MethodsPatients with inoperable stage IIIB NSCLC received docetaxel 20 mg/m² and cisplatin 25 mg/m² on days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29, and 36, with concurrent radiation therapy 5 days per week for a total dose of 66 Gy. Patients achieving stable disease, partial response, or complete response were given DCT on days 71, 92, and 113. DCT was started with 75 mg/m² and titrated depending on tolerability. The MTD of docetaxel was defined as the dose preceding that at which 3 or more patients experienced dose-limiting toxicity (DLT).ResultsOf 23 patients enrolled (median age, 58.8 years ± 7.3 years), 19 received complete CRT (4 withdrew because of toxicity). Of the patients receiving complete CRT, 1 patient died and 1 became operable, leaving 17 patients eligible for DCT starting at 75 mg/m². After the third patient with DLT, dose was reduced to 60 mg/m². Median survival was 27.6 months ± 23.1 months. Median TTP was 12.4 months ± 10.7 months.ConclusionThe MTD of DCT after concurrent cisplatin/docetaxel CRT was determined to be 60 mg/m², but toxicity was considerable. The benefit-risk ratio of DCT has, however, been questioned by a placebo-controlled phase III trial. Further phase III trials need to consider further stratification factors (pretreatment forced expiratory volume [FEV]₁, hemoglobin, performance, and stage) to define a role for DCT in patients with NSCLC.     

Paclitaxel and carboplatin in combination with gemcitabine: a phase I-II trial in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Gruppo Studio Tumori Polmonari Veneto (GSTPV).

Background:The combination of paclitaxel (P) and carboplatin (C)is an effective treatment for advanced NSCLC. Gemcitabine (G) is an active newdrug. We planned a phase I study to find the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) ofthe PCG combination. A phase II study was subsequently conducted to evaluatethe activity and toxicity of PCG. Patients and methods:Forty-five patients entered the study.Twenty-eight had stage IIIA–B disease, 17 stage IV. In the phase Istudy, with a fixed dose of C at AUC = 6 on day 1, P was escalated usingincrements of 25 mg/m² starting from 175 mg/m² on day1 and G with increments of 200 mg/m² starting from 800mg/m² on day 1 and 8. Results:Fourteen patients entered the phase I study. The MTD wasreached at P 200 mg/m², C AUC = 6 and G 1000 mg/m².Neutropenic fever and grade 3 diarrhea were the dose limiting toxicities.Thirty-one patients were treated in the phase II study with P 175mg/m², C AUC = 6 and G 1000 mg/m². Response rate was57% (68% in stage III and 47% in stage IV).Myelosuppression was the main toxicity, with grade 3–4 leukopeniaoccurring in 35% of cases. Grade 3 anemia was observed in 24%of cases and grade 3–4 thrombocytopenia occurred in 34% ofpatients. Non-hematological toxicity was mild. Median survival and one-yearactuarial survival were 20.5 months and 74% for stage III and 11.5months and 47% for stage IV. Conclusions:PCG is a promising regimen for treating advancedNSCLC. A phase III study comparing PCG to paclitaxel plus carboplatin inadvanced NSCLC is ongoing. On the other hand, we are planning to introduce thePCG regimen in the treatment of stage II–III patients in the setting ofa multimodality treatment.