Phase II study of paclitaxel and carboplatin in patients with advanced gastric cancer

5-Fluorouracil-based combination chemotherapy is commonly used in patients with advanced gastric cancer, but results with such therapy are fairly modest. Evaluation of newer agents is therefore required in this disease. Paclitaxel has shown promising activity as a single agent in gastric cancer. In vitro, paclitaxel exhibits sequence-dependent synergy with platinum compounds against gastric cancer. This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of combination carboplatin and paclitaxel in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Twenty-seven patients with measurable or evaluable advanced gastric cancer were enrolled on the study from April 1996 to July 2000. Patients were treated with paclitaxel 200 mg/m intravenously during 3 hours followed by carboplatin at projected area under the curve 5 mg x h x ml (as per the Calvert formula). Twenty-six patients were assessable for toxicity, and 25 patients were assessable for objective response. Nine of the 27 enrolled patients had a major response for an objective response rate of 33% (95% CI 0.17-0.54) by intention-to-treat analysis. The median response duration was 4.9 months (95% CI 2.8-7.3), and median survival was 7.5 months. The 1-year survival rate was 23%. One hundred seventeen courses were administered with a median of four courses per patient administered. The major toxicity was neutropenia, with grade III to IV neutropenia observed in 9 patients (33%) and neutropenic fever in only 1 patient. Grade III peripheral neuropathy developed in two patients, and grade III myalgia and grade III fatigue developed in one patient each. There were no treatment-related deaths. The combination of carboplatin and paclitaxel is a highly tolerable, regimen with activity comparable to that of other regimens in advanced gastric cancer. This regimen needs to be further evaluated in combination with other agents and as a component of multimodality therapy in gastric cancer.     

Phase II trial of carboplatin and paclitaxel in cisplatin-pretreated advanced transitional cell carcinoma: a Southwest Oncology Group study

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the study was to assess the efficacy and toxicity of carboplatin and paclitaxel administered every 3 weeks in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma, previously treated with cisplatin-based therapy. METHODS: Eligibility included metastatic or locally advanced unresectable transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelial tract. Prior chemotherapy, except taxanes, was permitted within 12 months. Adequate hematologic, hepatic, and renal function and a performance status of 0-2 were required. Treatment consisted of paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 intravenously for 3 hours followed by carboplatin, target area under the curve = 5 repeated every 3 weeks. RESULTS: Forty-four patients were enrolled. Thirty-four (77%) patients had a performance status of 0 or 1. Twenty-five (57%) of the patients had received prior neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy, and 19 (43%) had received it for metastatic disease. In all, 181 cycles were administered (median, 3.5 cycles; range, 1-11 cycles). The predominant NCI CTC (version 2.0) Grades 3 and 4 toxicities consisted of myelosuppression in 28 patients and neuropathy in 11 patients. There were no treatment-related deaths. Of the 44 patients, 1 (2%) had a complete response, 2 (5%) had a partial response, and 4 (9%) had an unconfirmed partial response, for an overall response rate of 16% (95% confidence interval [CI] 7-30%). The median progression-free survival was 4 months (95% CI 3-5 months) and the median survival was 6 months (95% CI 5-8 months). CONCLUSIONS: Carboplatin and paclitaxel combination is well tolerated and has modest activity in platinum refractory advanced urothelial carcinoma. Effective regimens need to be developed in cisplatin-pretreated urothelial carcinoma.     

Phase II study of weekly paclitaxel and 24-hour infusion of high-dose 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in the treatment of recurrent or metastatic gastric cancer

To investigate the efficacy and safety of combining weekly paclitaxel with weekly 24-hour infusion of high-dose 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV, folinic acid) in the treatment of patients with advanced gastric cancer. Patients with histologically confirmed recurrent or metastatic gastric cancer were studied. Paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 3-hour intravenous infusion was given on days 1, 8, and 15, and high-dose 5-FU 2,600 mg/m2 plus LV 300 mg/m2 24-hour intravenous infusion (HDFL) was given on days 2, 9, and 16, repeated every 4 weeks. Between August 1997 and August 2003, 30 patients were enrolled. The median age was 58 years (range: 37-70). Eighteen patients (60.0%) had recurrent or metastatic disease and 12 patients had de novo metastatic disease. Among the 27 patients evaluable for tumor response, 2 achieved complete response and 9 achieved partial response, with an overall response rate of 40.7% (95% confidence interval, CI: 22-61%). Eleven of the 21 patients without prior exposure to HDFL-containing regimens responded (response rate: 52.4%, 95% CI: 29-74%), while none of the 6 patients who had previously failed HDFL-containing regimens responded (p value = 0.054 by Fisher's exact test). All 30 patients were evaluated for survival and toxicities. Median time to progression and overall survival were 6 and 10 months, respectively. Major grade 3-4 toxicities were neutropenia in 12 patients (40.0%), diarrhea in 10 patients (33.3%), and stomatitis in 3 patients (10.0%). Grade 1-2 and 3-4 paclitaxel-related neuropathy developed in 16 (53.3%) and 2 (6.7%) patients, respectively. None of the patients discontinued protocol treatment because of paclitaxel-related neuropathy or developed HDFL-related hyperammonemic encephalopathy. This paclitaxel-HDFL regimen is effective and well tolerated in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer.     

A phase II study of carboplatin and paclitaxel as first line chemotherapy in elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

INTRODUCTION: Lung cancer is the leading cause of tumour-related deaths in the elderly population but the optimal management of advanced NSCLC in older patients has not been defined to date. The present phase II study was planned to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of the combination of carboplatin and paclitaxel in elderly patients with advanced NSCLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (>70 years old) who had pathologically been proven to have a NSCLC and measurable lesions were treated with paclitaxel (175 mg/m2 for 3h) and carboplatin [area under the concentration-time curve (AUC=5)] on day 1 every 3 weeks. RESULTS: Forty patients were enrolled into the study. The median age was 74 years (range, 70-78 years). Approximately 85% of the patients had stage IV and 80% had a performance status (PS) of 0-1. Nine of the 40 (22.5%; 90% CI 17.6-28.1) included patients had a partial response; one patient (2.5%; 90% CI 1.7-3.2) achieved a complete response. The overall response rate was 25% (90% CI 15.3-38.6). In addition stable disease was observed in 13 patients (32.5%; 90% CI 24.3-40.7). The median survival was 7.8 months (95% confidence interval, 5.1-11.8 months). The actual 1-year survival was 18% (95% confidence interval, 12-29%). The median time to disease progression was 4.1 months (95% CI 2.8-8.5). Overall, 37.5% of patients experienced grade 3-4 neutropenia of any duration with only two patients (5%) developing neutropenic fever. Grade 3 or 4 non-haematological toxicity was uncommon apart alopecia. CONCLUSIONS: In the present phase II study the combination of paclitaxel and carboplatin has demonstrated to be active and safe in an age-selected population.     

Phase II study of continuous infusional 5-fluorouracil with epirubicin and carboplatin (instead of cisplatin) in patients with metastatic/locally advanced breast cancer (infusional ECarboF): a very active and well-tolerated outpatient regimen.

Infusional 5-fluorouracil (F) with cisplatin (C) and epirubicin (E), so-called infusional ECF, is a highly active new schedule against locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer. Cisplatin, however, is a major contributor to toxicity and usually requires inpatient treatment. In an attempt to overcome this, we have investigated the effect of substituting carboplatin for cisplatin in our original infusional ECF regimen. Fifty-two patients with metastatic (n = 36) or locally advanced/inflammatory (n = 16) breast cancer were treated with 5-fluorouracil 200 mg m-2 day-1 via a Hickman line using an ambulatory pump for for 6 months, with epirubicin 50 mg m-2 intravenously (i.v.) and carboplatin AUC5 i.v. every 4 weeks, for six courses (infusional ECarboF). The overall response rate (complete plus partial) was 81% (95% CI 67%-90%), with a complete response rate of 17% (95% CI 6-33%) in patients with metastatic disease and 56% (95% CI 30-80%) in patients with locally advanced disease. Median response duration and survival for metastatic disease was 8 and 14 months respectively, and two patients with locally advanced disease have relapsed. These results are very similar to those previously achieved with infusional ECF. Severe grade 3/4 toxicity was low. Infusional ECarboF is a highly active, well-tolerated, outpatient regimen effective against advanced/metastatic breast cancer and now warrants evaluation against conventional chemotherapy in high-risk early breast cancer.     

Paclitaxel, 5-fluorouracil, and cisplatin combination chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced gastric carcinoma

BACKGROUND: Although the clinical efficacy of paclitaxel in the treatment of gastric carcinoma has not been clearly defined, recent reports have suggested a possible role in the treatment of upper gastrointestinal carcinomas in vitro and in vivo. In this study, the authors evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of a combination chemotherapy that included paclitaxel, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and cisplatin in the treatment of patients with advanced gastric carcinoma. METHODS: Forty-one gastric carcinoma patients with metastatic disease, unresectable advanced disease, or relapsed disease were treated with the following regimen, administered every 28 days: paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 by 3-hour intravenous (i.v.) infusion on Day 1, 5-FU 750 mg/m2 by 24-hour continuous i.v. infusion on Days 1-5, and cisplatin 20 mg/m2 by 2-hour i.v. infusion on Days 1-5. Twenty-six patients had measurable disease, and 15 had evaluable disease. All patients were assessable for toxicity. RESULTS: Twenty-one of the 41 patients (51%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 36.5-65.7%) demonstrated an objective response, including 4 complete responses (10%; 95% CI, 3.9-22.5%). Sixty-five percent of the patients with measurable disease (17 of 26; 95% CI, 58-92.5%) and 27% of the patients with evaluable disease (4 of 15: 95% CI, 11.1-52.3%) achieved a complete response or a partial response. The median response duration was 17 weeks (range, 4-90 weeks), and the median survival duration for all patients was 26 weeks (range, 8 to 118+ weeks). The major toxicity of this treatment was myelosuppression with neutropenia of World Health Organization Grade 3 and 4 in 24% and 10% of the patients, respectively. Nonhematologic toxicity included mucositis, nausea/vomiting, diarrhea, neurotoxicity, and alopecia. Fluid retention occurred in two patients, and one patient had an anaphylatic reaction. Dose reduction was necessary for one patient, because Grade 4 neutropenia and mucositis occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Paclitaxel, 5-FU, and cisplatin was an active combination regimen in the treatment of advanced gastric carcinoma. The toxicity of this regimen was tolerable. Based on these findings, this combination regimen could be an attractive treatment in the preoperative setting.     

Phase II study of Taxol combined With ifosfamide and carboplatin in the treatment of stage IIIb-IV non-small-cell lung cancer

The objective of the present study was to evaluate the activity and the toxicity of an original combination of paclitaxel (Taxol), ifosfamide, and carboplatin in patients with stage IIIB-IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Sixty-one patients with previously untreated stage IIIB-IV NSCLC were enrolled by five institutions. Paclitaxel was given at the dose of 200 mg/m iv in 3 hours, ifosfamide (with mesna) at the dose of 3 g/m and carboplatin at an area under the curve 5, on day 1, every 21 days for a total of six cycles in responding or stabilized patients. Among the 59 patients evaluable for response, 2 complete remissions and 25 partial remissions were achieved for an overall response rate of 45.7% (95% CI = 32.7-59.2). According to an intention-to-treat analysis, the response rate was 44.2%. Thirteen patients had a stable disease, whereas 19 progressed. The median time to progression was 7.7 months (range: 1-18), whereas the median overall survival was 10 months (range: 1-30+). The 1-year survival rate was 43%. Hematologic toxicity was exceptionally mild, and peripheral neurologic toxicity of grade III was experienced by only three patients. There was one toxic death. This original triplet regimen based on paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and carboplatin has proved active, safe, and easy to deliver on an outpatient basis for patients with advanced NSCLC. Randomized studies both versus carboplatin-paclitaxel and other triplets are clearly warranted.     

PFC方案治疗晚期食管贲门癌的临床观察

目的：观察PFC方案（紫杉醇联合氟尿嘧啶和顺铂）治疗晚期不能手术或手术未能完全切除及术后复发的食管癌和贲门癌患者的疗效和毒性。方法：41例患者分别接受PFC方案化疗2～6周期,按WHO标准评价疗效及毒副反应。结果：41例均可评价,其中完全缓解（CR）3例7．3％,部分缓解（PR）18例43．9％,稳定（SD）15例36．6％,进展（PD）5例12.2％。中位疾病进展时间为7．9个月,中位生存时间为11．3个月。结论：PFC方案治疗晚期食管贲门癌患者安全有效,毒副反应较轻。     

Cisplatin and carboplatin combination as second-line chemotherapy in dacarbazine-resistant melanoma patients

High-dose cisplatin regimens have been shown to be highly active in advanced melanoma patients but are associated with unacceptable side effects. In order to increase the platinum dose but avoid severe side effects, we treated 15 dacarbazine (DTIC)-resistant metastatic melanoma patients with a combination regimen of cisplatin (100 mg/m2) and carboplatin (200 mg/m2), two platinum analogues with a similar mode of action but a different toxicity pattern. After a mean follow-up period of 10.7 months (range 4-18 months), two patients (13.3%) achieved complete remission and two patients (13.3%) showed partial remission, giving an overall response rate of 26.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.2-49%). Furthermore, three patients (20%; 95% CI 0-40.2%) experienced stable disease. The median duration of response was 7.1 months (95% CI 4.2-10.0 months), and the median overall survival was 12.5 months (95% CI 5.8-19.2 months), with eight patients still alive. The main side effects were haematological (leukopenia/thrombocytopenia World Health Organization [WHO] grade I-IV; anaemia WHO grade I-III), gastrointestinal (WHO grade I-III), neurological (WHO grade I-II) and renal (WHO grade I) toxicity. Nevertheless, except in one patient, side effects did not result in discontinuation of therapy. Despite the small number of patients treated in this preliminary study, we believe that combining cisplatin and carboplatin represents a novel, active and well-tolerated therapeutic option as second-line chemotherapy in DTIC-resistant advanced melanoma patients.     

A phase II study of carboplatin and paclitaxel in esophageal cancer.

BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of combination carboplatin and paclitaxel in patients with esophageal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-five patients were enrolled. Patients were treated with paclitaxel 200 mg/m(2) intravenously (i.v.) over 3 h and carboplatin i.v. at an AUC of 5 mg/h/ml. Thirty-three patients were assessable for toxicity and objective response. RESULTS: A total of 166 treatment courses were administered with a median of five courses per patient. The objective response rate was 43% [90% confidence interval (CI) 0.3-0.58] by the intention-to-treat analysis. The median response duration was 2.8 months (90% CI 2.1-5.4). The median survival time was 9 months (90% CI 7-13.8) and the 1-year survival rate was 43% (90% CI 0.29-0.57). The major grade 3-4 toxicity observed was neutropenia, occurring in 17 patients (52%). There were no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of carboplatin and paclitaxel is an moderately active and tolerable regimen in advanced esophageal cancer.     

Phase II trial of weekly paclitaxel in patients with previously treated advanced urothelial cancer.

PURPOSE: We evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of weekly paclitaxel in patients with previously treated advanced urothelial cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with urothelial cancer who had received one prior systemic chemotherapy regimen for advanced disease and had evidence of disease progression were eligible for enrollment. Patients received paclitaxel 80 mg/m(2) by 1-hour intravenous infusion weekly. A cycle of therapy consisted of four weekly treatments. RESULTS: The study enrolled 31 patients. Mean age was 66 years, and 45% of patients had three or more involved metastatic sites. Only 26% of patients had responded to prior chemotherapy. The median number of cycles delivered was three (range, one to eight) at a mean weekly paclitaxel dose of 79 mg/m(2). Three patients achieved a partial response (10%; 95% confidence interval, 0% to 20%). Median time to progression was 2.2 months, and median overall survival time was 7.2 months. Therapy was well tolerated with minimal hematologic toxicity. Grade 3 nonhematologic toxicities were also uncommon. CONCLUSION: Although the overall response rate to weekly paclitaxel in patients with previously treated advanced urothelial cancer was modest, the chemotherapy-refractory nature of the study population should be considered.     

Rational drug sequencing of paclitaxel, gemcitabine and carboplatin in patients with untreated stage IV and select stage IIIB non-small cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION: To conduct a phase II study evaluating the efficacy of rationally sequenced paclitaxel, gemcitabine, and carboplatin in patients with stage IV or select stage IIIB non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Patients with select stages IIIB (pleural effusion) and IV NSCLC with an ECOG performance status of 0-1 and no prior chemotherapy for their disease were eligible to participate. Treatment was delivered as follows: paclitaxel at 70 mg/m2 followed by gemcitabine at 300 mg/m2 on day 1, with carboplatin (AUC 5) on day 2 of a 28-day cycle. Response was assessed after every two cycles of therapy. The primary endpoint of this trial was response rate, with secondary endpoints of time to progression and 1 year overall survival. RESULTS: Twenty patients were enrolled on protocol, one of whom never received chemotherapy. The median number of cycles delivered was 3 (range 0-8). A partial response rate of 42% (8/19; 95% CI: 20-67%) and a stable disease rate of 11% (2/19; 95% CI: 1-33%) were observed. The median overall survival time was 9.6 months (95% CI: 4.6-16.6), with a 1 year overall survival rate of 42.1% (95% CI: 24.9-71.3%). Eight patients (42%) stopped treatment due to toxicity. CONCLUSION: Paclitaxel followed by gemcitabine and then carboplatin is an active, albeit complex, regimen in the treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC with insufficient advantage to justify continuation of this regimen.     

A phase II study of docetaxel and cisplatin in patients with gastric cancer recurring after or progressing during 5-FU/platinum treatment

BACKGROUND: Docetaxel plus cisplatin (DP) is a combination chemotherapy regimen that is active against untreated advanced gastric cancer. We evaluated the feasibility of DP treatment in patients with recurring or metastatic gastric cancer who had been previously treated with other chemotherapy regimens. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The DP regimen consisted of docetaxel (75 mg/m(2) i.v.) and cisplatin (60 mg/m(2) i.v.) over 1 h on Day 1 every 4 weeks for a maximum of nine cycles. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients (28 men, 9 women; median age, 53 years; range 28-71 years) received a total of 128 cycles of therapy (median, 3; range 1-9). Twenty-six patients had recurrent disease and 11 had metastatic tumors. The objective response rate was 32.4% (95% confidence interval = 16.6-48.3%), including 1 complete response and 11 partial responses. Eleven had stable disease, whereas 12 had progressive disease. The median duration of response was 70.5 days (range 30-392 days). Grade 3/4 toxicities included anemia (10.8%), leukopenia (27.0%), neutropenia (51.4%), thrombocytopenia (2.7%), nausea/vomiting (5.4%) and oral mucositis (13.5%). Median time to progression was 136 days and median overall survival was 235 days. CONCLUSION: The DP combination was well tolerated and effective for patients with metastatic gastric cancer treated previously with 5-fluorouracil/platinum chemotherapy.     

Preoperative chemoimmunotherapy with Carboplatin, epidoxorubicin, 5-Fluorouracil and alpha-2b interferon in locally advanced inoperable gastric-cancer

Twenty-six patients with locally advanced, inoperable gastric cancer were treated with carboplatin, epidoxorubicin, 5-fluorouracil (FEP) plus alpha 2b interferon. Total gastrectomy was performed in patients achieving clinical complete or partial response. The overall response rate after neoadjuvant chemotherapy was 67%. In 13/15 patients undergoing surgery no residual tumor was evident after resection. After a median follow-up of 14 months, 4/13 disease-free patients have relapsed. The median survival time is 13 months for all patients, and 19 months for disease-free patients; in four patients survival time exceeds twenty-four months. Our multimodality program is effective in locally advanced gastric cancer and warrants further evaluation.     

紫杉醇、顺铂和替吉奥联合化疗方案治疗晚期胃癌的疗效和安全性

目的:探讨紫杉醇联合顺铂(腹腔给药)和替吉奥(TS-1)治疗晚期胃癌的疗效和安全性.方法:连续收集2008年1月-2011年1月接受住院治疗的50例晚期胃癌患者.采用紫杉醇(静脉给药)联合顺铂(腹腔给药)和TS-1(口服给药)方案进行治疗,评价近期疗效和不良反应.平均随访时间为11.4个月,计算无进展生存期(progression-free survival,PFS)和总生存期(overall survival,OS).结果:50例患者中,完全缓解5例,部分缓解23例,客观缓解率为56％.中位PFS为6.0个月(95％可信区间:3.4～8.6个月),中位OS为13.0个月(95％可信区间:7.9～18.1个月).主要不良反应为胃肠系统不良反应、血液学毒性和疲乏,多为Ⅰ～Ⅱ度;有3例患者发生Ⅲ～Ⅳ度不良反应(1例为呕吐,2例为肝功能损害).2例在化疗前存在不完全性肠梗阻的患者,接受化疗2个周期后肠梗阻缓解;另1例患者在腹腔化疗后发生化疗相关性肠梗阻.结论:紫杉醇联合顺铂和TS-1治疗晚期胃癌的近期和远期疗效均较好,患者耐受良好.     

氟尿嘧啶/亚叶酸联合奥沙利铂或紫杉醇治疗晚期胃癌--临床随机对比研究

目的：比较氟尿嘧啶／亚叶酸(5-FU／FA)联合奥沙利铂与5-FU／FA联合紫杉醇治疗晚期胃癌的近期疗效和毒副反应。方法：40例进展期胃癌患者随机分成两组，5-FU／FA联合奥沙利铂组(A组)20例，70．0％为复治患者，5-FU／FA联合紫杉醇组(B组)20例，55．0％为复治患者，转移部位包括肝、淋巴结、腹腔、腹壁等。结果：两组患者各有20例可评价疗效，A组CR2例，PR7例，有效率(CR PR)45．0％，B组PR9例，有效率45．0％。A组有20例评价毒性反应，主要为骨髓抑制、外周神经毒性、消化道反应、肝功能损害；B组有20例可评价毒性反应，主要为骨髓抑制、肝功能损害。结论：5-FU／FA联合奥沙利铂与联合紫杉醇治疗晚期胃癌疗效相当．毒性反应可耐受。两者相比，联合奥沙利铂具有用药方便，严重的毒副反应少等优点。     

Chemotherapy with an every-2-week regimen of gemcitabine and paclitaxel in patients with transitional cell carcinoma who have received prior cisplatin-based therapy.

BACKGROUND: An every-2-week regimen of gemcitabine and paclitaxel was adapted for patients with advanced transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) who had received prior cisplatin-based chemotherapy. METHODS: Forty-one patients with advanced or metastatic TCC who had received prior cisplatin-based systemic chemotherapy were treated with an outpatient regimen of gemcitabine 2500-3000 mg/m(2) and paclitaxel 150 mg/m(2) every 2 weeks. RESULTS: Forty of 41 patients had measurable disease. Response was observed in 24 patients (60%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 45-75%). Eleven (28%) achieved complete response, and 13 (33%) obtained partial response. Twenty of 25 patients (80%; 95% CI, 64-96%) who had been previously treated in the neoadjuvant or adjuvant setting responded versus 4 of 15 (27%; 95% CI, 5-49%) in patients who received prior methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, cisplatin (M-VAC) for metastatic disease. The median duration of survival for patients given gemcitabine and paclitaxel after failing neoadjuvant or adjuvant M-VAC was 12 months (range, 2-43+), as compared with only 8 months (range, 2-28) for patients who had been treated after failure of prior therapy for metastatic disease. For all patients, the median duration of response was 6.4 months (range, 2-43.3+ months), and the median survival was 14.4 months (range, 2-43+). Thirteen patients (32%) developed World Health Organization Grade 3-4 neutropenia, with febrile neutropenia in 3 (7%) patients. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was given to 10 (24%) patients. There was no Grade 3-4 anemia or thrombocytopenia. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of gemcitabine and taxol in previously treated patients with recurrent TCC is highly effective and produces objective durable responses. This every-2-week schedule is a well tolerated outpatient regimen with minimal toxicity.     

A phase II study of paclitaxel, carboplatin, and hyperfractionated radiation therapy for locally advanced inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer (a Vanderbilt Cancer Center Affiliate Network Study)

PURPOSE: We conducted a prospective phase II study to determine the response rate, toxicity, and survival rate of concurrent weekly paclitaxel, carboplatin, and hyperfractionated radiation therapy (paclitaxel/carboplatin/HFX RT) followed by 2 cycles of paclitaxel and carboplatin for locally advanced unresectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin regimen was designed to optimize the radiosensitizing properties of paclitaxel during the concurrent phase of treatment. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Forty-three patients with unresectable stage IIIA and IIIB NSCLC from the Vanderbilt Cancer Center and Affiliate Network (VCCAN) institutions were entered onto the study from June 1996 until May 1997. Weekly intravenous (IV) paclitaxel (50 mg/m(2)/l-hour) and weekly carboplatin (AUC 2) plus concurrent hyperfractionated chest RT (1.2 Gy/BID/69.6 Gy) were delivered for 6 weeks followed by 2 cycles of paclitaxel (200 mg/m(2)) and carboplatin (AUC 6). RESULTS: Forty-two patients were evaluable for response and toxicities. Three patients achieved a complete response (7.2%) and 30 patients achieved a partial response (71.4%), for an overall response rate of 78.6% [95% C.I. (66.2%-91.0%)]. The 1- and 2-year overall and progression-free survival rates of all 43 patients were 61.6% and 35% respectively, with a median survival time of 14.3 months. The median follow-up time was 14 months. Esophagitis was the principal toxicity. Grade 3 or 4 esophagitis occurred in 11 patients (26%). There was an incidence of 7% grade 3 and 9.5% grade 4 pulmonary toxicities. CONCLUSIONS: Weekly paclitaxel, carboplatin, plus concurrent hyperfractionated RT is a well-tolerated outpatient regimen. The response rate from this regimen is encouraging and appears to be at least equivalent to the more toxic chemoradiation trials. These findings warrant further clinical evaluation of weekly paclitaxel/carboplatin/HFX RT in a phase III study.     

A phase II trial of weekly paclitaxel and gemcitabine in non-small cell lung cancer patients previously treated with platinum and vinorelbine

This study evaluated the activity and toxicity of a weekly paclitaxel plus gemcitabine combination as second-line treatment in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 on days 1, 8 and 15 and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks were administered to 34 consecutive, advanced NSCLC patients uniformly pretreated with cisplatin or carboplatin and vinorelbine. The median time interval from first- to second-line treatment was 8 weeks (range 1-72). A total of 124 cycles with a median of 3 cycles per patient were administered (range 1-6). Four patients (12%) achieved a partial response (95% confidence interval: 1-23%), 17 had stable disease (50%) and 12 progressed (37%). Three responses were observed in 14 patients showing disease response or stabilization to previous platinum therapy. The median survival was 28 weeks (range 3-91), the median progression-free survival was 12 weeks (range 3-50) and the 1-year survival rate was 23%. The toxicity profile was favorable. In conclusion, a weekly schedule of paclitaxel plus gemcitabine as a second-line regimen has moderate activity and good tolerability in NSCLC patients not refractory to previous platinum-vinorelbine treatment.     

Induction chemotherapy with carboplatin/paclitaxel followed by surgery or standard radiotherapy and concurrent daily low-dose cisplatin for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

Five-year survival in patients with unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is less than 10%. In the present phase II study, 43 patients with locally advanced stage IIIA or selected IIIB NSCLC were given four courses of carboplatin AUC = 6 and paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 (3-hour infusion), every 3 weeks. Responsive patients, when possible, underwent surgery followed by standard radiotherapy (50 Gy) or radiotherapy (60 Gy), with concurrent cisplatin as intravenous continuous infusion of 4 mg/m2/d. Sixteen of the 42 evaluable patients achieved partial response (38%) and 3 complete response (CR) (7%) for an overall response rate of 45% (95% CI 30.1-60.2). R0 resectability rate was 29%, with 21% of pathologic CRs. Three more CRs were achieved with concurrent chemoradiotherapy in responsive but unresected patients. Grade III/IV hematologic toxicity was 9%, while one perioperative death occurred. The median duration of response was 14 months (range: 3-44+); median survival was 15 months (range: 9-47+). One-year and 2-year survival rates were 51% and 22%, respectively. The median survival in the responsive resected patients was 26 months, with 2-year survival of 57%. Carboplatin/paclitaxel represents an effective and well-tolerated induction therapy, suggesting its possible role in combination with radiotherapy as neoadjuvant treatment in locally advanced NSCLC in alternative to cisplatin-based regimens.