Lipoprotein(a) and atherosclerosis: New perspectives on the mechanism of action of an enigmatic lipoprotein

Although elevated plasma concentrations of lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) have been identified as a risk factor for coronary heart disease, the pathophysiologic and physiologic roles of Lp(a) continue to elude basic researchers and clinicians alike. Lp(a) is a challenging lipoprotein to study because it has a complex structure consisting of a low-density lipoprotein-like moiety to which is covalently attached the unique glycoprotein apolipoprotein(a) (apo(a)). Apo(a) contains multiply repeated kringle domains that are similar to a sequence found in the fibrinolytic proenzyme plasminogen; differing numbers of kringle sequences in apo(a) give rise to Lp(a) isoform size heterogeneity. In addition to elevated plasma concentrations of Lp(a), apo(a) isoform size has been identified as a risk factor for coronary heart disease, although studies addressing this relationship have been limited. The similarity of Lp(a) to low-density lipoprotein and plasminogen provides an enticing link between the processes of atherosclerosis and thrombosis, although a clear demonstration of this association in vivo has not been provided. Clearly, Lp(a) is a risk factor for both atherothrombotic and purely thrombotic events; a plethora of mechanisms to explain these clinical findings has been provided by both in vitro studies as well as animal models for Lp(a).     

Association of elevated lipoprotein(a) levels and coronary heart disease in NIDDM patients. Relationship with apolipoprotein(a) phenotypes

Summary Non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) is a strong and independent risk factor for coronary heart disease. We assessed the potential relationship between plasma Lp(a) levels, apo(a) phenotypes and coronary heart disease in a population of NIDDM patients. Seventy-one patients with coronary heart disease, who previously have had transmural myocardial infarction, or significant stenosis on coronary angiography, or positive myocardial thallium scintigraphy, or in combination, were compared with 67 patients without coronary heart disease, who tested negatively upon either coronary angiography, myocardial thallium scintigraphy or a maximal exercise test. The prevalence of plasma Lp(a) levels elevated above the threshold for increased cardiovascular risk (>0.30 g/l) was significantly higher (p=0.005) in patients with coronary heart disease (33.8%) compared to the control group (13.4%). The relative risk (odds ratio) of coronary heart disease among patients with high Lp(a) concentrations was 3.1 (95% confidence interval, 1.31–7.34;p=0.01). The overall frequency distribution of apo(a) phenotypes differed significantly between the two groups (p=0.043). However, the frequency of apo(a) isoforms of low apparent molecular mass (700 kDa) was of borderline significance (p=0.067) between patients with or without coronary heart disease (29.6% and 16.4%, respectively). In this Caucasian population of NIDDM patients, elevated Lp(a) levels were associated with coronary heart disease, an association which was partially accounted for by the higher frequency of apo(a) isoforms of small size. In multivariate analyses, elevated levels of Lp(a) were independently associated with coronary heart disease (odds ratio 3.48, p=0.0233).Abbreviations NIDDM Non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus - IDDM insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus - CHD coronary heart disease - Lp(a) lipoprotein(a) - apo(a) apolipoprotein(a) - apoB apolipoprotein B - HMGCoA reductase hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase     

High levels of inflammatory biomarkers are associated with increased allele-specific apolipoprotein(a) levels in African-Americans

BACKGROUND: A role of inflammation for cardiovascular disease (CVD) is established. Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is an independent CVD risk factor where plasma levels are determined by the apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] gene, which contains inflammatory response elements. DESIGN: We investigated the effect of inflammation on allele-specific apo(a) levels in African-Americans and Caucasians. We determined Lp(a) levels, apo(a) sizes, allele-specific apo(a) levels, fibrinogen and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels in 167 African-Americans and 259 Caucasians. RESULTS: Lp(a) levels were increased among African-Americans with higher vs. lower levels of CRP [<3 vs. > or =3 mg/liter (143 vs. 108 nmol/liter), P = 0.009] or fibrinogen (<340 vs. > or =340 mg/liter, P = 0.002). We next analyzed allele-specific apo(a) levels for different apo(a) sizes. No differences in allele-specific apo(a) levels across CRP or fibrinogen groups were seen among African-Americans or Caucasians for small apo(a) sizes (<22 kringle 4 repeats). Allele-specific apo(a) levels for medium apo(a) sizes (22-30 kringle 4 repeats) were significantly higher among African-Americans, with high levels of CRP or fibrinogen compared with those with low levels (88 vs. 67 nmol/liter, P = 0.014, and 91 vs. 59 nmol/liter, P < 0.0001, respectively). No difference was found for Caucasians. CONCLUSIONS: Increased levels of CRP or fibrinogen are associated with higher allele-specific medium-sized apo(a) levels in African-Americans but not in Caucasians. These findings indicate that proinflammatory conditions result in a selective increase in medium-sized apo(a) levels in African-Americans and suggest that inflammation-associated events may contribute to the interethnic difference in Lp(a) levels between African-Americans and Caucasians.     

Lipoprotein(a) as a Potential Causal Genetic Risk Factor of Cardiovascular Disease: A Rationale for Increased Efforts to Understand its Pathophysiology and Develop Targeted Therapies

Recent published studies have provided increasing evidence that lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] may be a potential causal, genetic, independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD). Lp(a) levels >25 mg/dl are present in ～30% of Caucasians and 60% to 70% of Blacks. Lp(a) is composed of apolipoprotein B-100 and apolipoprotein (a) [(apo(a)]. Circulating Lp(a) levels are primarily influenced by the LPA gene without significant dietary or environmental effects, mediating CVD risk throughout the patient's lifetime. Recent clinical outcomes studies, meta-analyses, and Mendelian randomization studies, in which randomization of Lp(a) levels is achieved through the random assortment of LPA gene variants thereby removing confounders, have shown that genetically determined Lp(a) levels are continuously and linearly related to risk of CVD. Currently, Lp(a) pathophysiology is not fully understood, and specifically targeted therapies to lower Lp(a) are not available. We provide a rationale for increased basic and clinical investigational efforts to further understand Lp(a) pathophysiology and assess whether reducing Lp(a) levels minimizes CVD risk. First, a detailed understanding of Lp(a) synthesis and clearance has not been realized. Second, several mechanisms of atherogenicity are known to varying extent, but the relative contributions of each are not known. Lp(a) may be atherothrombotic through its low-density lipoprotein moiety, but also through apo(a), including its ability to be retained in the vessel wall and mediate pro-inflammatory and proapoptotic effects including those potentiated by its content of oxidized phospholipids, and antifibrinolytic effects. Finally, development of specific Lp(a)-lowering agents to potently lower Lp(a) will allow testing of mechanistic hypotheses in animal models and the design of randomized clinical trials to assess reduction in CVD. A convergence of academic, scientific, pharmaceutical, and National Institutes of Health priorities and efforts can make this a reality in the next decade.     

Urinary excretion of apolipoprotein(a) fragments in type 1 diabetes mellitus patients

High levels of plasma lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] represent an independent risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity; however, Lp(a) has not yet been identified as a risk factor for type 1 diabetic patients. Results from the limited number of available studies on plasma Lp(a) levels in relation to renal function in type 1 diabetes mellitus are inconclusive. We hypothesized that only type 1 diabetes mellitus patients with impaired renal function show increased plasma Lp(a) levels, due to decreased urinary apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] excretion. We therefore measured urinary apo(a) levels in 52 type 1 diabetes mellitus patients and 52 matched controls, and related the urinary apo(a) concentration to the plasma Lp(a) level, kidney function, and metabolic control. Our findings indicate that patients with incipient diabetic nephropathy as evidenced by microalbuminuria (20 to 200 microg/min) exhibit significantly higher plasma Lp(a) levels (median, 15.6 mg/dL) in comparison to normoalbuminuric patients (median, 10.3 mg/dL) and healthy controls (median, 12.0 mg/dL). Urinary apo(a) normalized to creatinine excretion was significantly elevated in both normoalbuminuric (median, 22.3 microg/dL) and microalbuminuric type 1 diabetic patients (median, 29.1 microg/dL) compared with healthy subjects (median, 16.0 microg/dL) and correlated significantly with Lp(a) plasma levels in both patient and control groups (P < .003). No correlation existed between the Lp(a) plasma level or urinary apo(a) concentration and metabolic control in type 1 diabetes mellitus patients. From these studies, we conclude that urinary apo(a) excretion is significantly increased in type 1 diabetic patients and correlates with plasma Lp(a) levels, and only type 1 diabetic patients with microalbuminuria have higher plasma levels of Lp(a) compared with patients with normoalbuminuria and healthy controls.     

Molecular analysis of apo(a) fragmentation in polygenic hypercholesterolemia: characterization of a new plasma fragment pattern

Hypercholesterolemia is frequently associated with elevated Lp(a) levels, an independent risk factor for coronary, cerebrovascular, and peripheral vascular disease. A portion of apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] circulates as a series of fragments derived from the N-terminal region of apo(a). The relationship of elevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] levels to those of circulating apo(a) fragments in polygenic hypercholesterolemia is indeterminate. Therefore, plasma Lp(a) and plasma and urinary apo(a) fragment levels were measured by ELISA in 82 patients with polygenic type IIa hypercholesterolemia (low density lipoprotein cholesterol >/=4.13 mmol/L and triglycerides <2.24 mmol/L) and in 90 normolipidemic subjects. Lp(a) levels were significantly elevated in patients compared with control subjects (0.35+/-0.4 and 0.24+/-0.31 mg/mL, respectively; median 0.13 and 0.11 mg/mL, respectively; P=0.039), although apo(a) isoform distribution did not differ. Patients displayed significantly higher plasma and urinary apo(a) fragment levels than did control subjects (respective values were as follows: 4.97+/-5.51 and 2.15+/-2.57 [median 2.85 and 1.17] microg/mL in plasma, P<0.0001; 75+/-86 and 40+/-57 [median 38 and 17] ng/mg urinary creatinine in urine, P<0.0001). The ratio of plasma apo(a) fragments to Lp(a) levels was also significantly higher in patients than in control subjects (1.93+/-1.5% and 1.75+/-2.36%, respectively; P<0.0001). We conclude that increased plasma Lp(a) levels in polygenic hypercholesterolemia are associated with elevated circulating levels of apo(a) fragments but that this increase is not due to decreased renal clearance of apo(a) fragments. Furthermore, we identified a new pattern of apo(a) fragmentation characterized by the predominance of a fragment band whose size was related to that of the parent apo(a) isoform and that was superimposed on the series of fragments described previously by Mooser et al (J Clin Invest. 1996; 98:2414-2424). This new pattern was associated with small apo(a) isoforms and did not discriminate between hypercholesterolemic and normal subjects. However, this new apo(a) fragment pattern may constitute a novel marker for cardiovascular risk.     

High levels of Lp(a) with a small apo(a) isoform are associated with coronary artery disease in African American and white men

Elevated levels of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] and the presence of small isoforms of apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] have been associated with coronary artery disease (CAD) in whites but not in African Americans. Because of marked race/ethnicity differences in the distribution of Lp(a) levels across apo(a) sizes, we tested the hypothesis that apo(a) isoform size determines the association between Lp(a) and CAD. We related Lp(a) levels, apo(a) isoforms, and the levels of Lp(a) associated with different apo(a) isoforms to the presence of CAD (>/=50% stenosis) in 576 white and African American men and women. Only in white men were Lp(a) levels significantly higher among patients with CAD than in those without CAD (28.4 versus 16.5 mg/dL, respectively; P:=0.004), and only in this group was the presence of small apo(a) isoforms (<22 kringle 4 repeats) associated with CAD (P:=0.043). Elevated Lp(a) levels (>/=30 mg/dL) were found in 26% of whites and 68% of African Americans, and of those, 80% of whites but only 26% of African Americans had a small apo(a) isoform. Elevated Lp(a) levels with small apo(a) isoforms were significantly associated with CAD (P:<0.01) in African American and white men but not in women. This association remained significant after adjusting for age, diabetes mellitus, smoking, hypertension, HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and triglycerides. We conclude that elevated levels of Lp(a) with small apo(a) isoforms independently predict risk for CAD in African American and white men. Our study, by determining the predictive power of Lp(a) levels combined with apo(a) isoform size, provides an explanation for the apparent lack of association of either measure alone with CAD in African Americans. Furthermore, our results suggest that small apo(a) size confers atherogenicity to Lp(a).     

Lack of change of lipoprotein (a) concentration with improved glycemic control in subjects with type II diabetes.

Recently, lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] has been identified as a major risk factor for coronary heart disease. No data are available on the effect of improved metabolic control on plasma Lp(a) concentrations in subjects with type II diabetes mellitus, a group at high risk for coronary heart disease. We examined the effects of improved metabolic control on plasma lipid and lipoproteins and Lp(a) concentrations in 12 subjects before and after 21 days of tight metabolic control. Glycosylated hemoglobin declined from 8.9% to 6.9% (P less than .002). Lp(a) increased slightly from 21.4 to 25.8 mg/dL (P = .119) with improved metabolic control. There were no significant differences in total, low-density, or high-density cholesterol values, although the decline in triglyceride concentrations was statistically significant. The distribution of apolipoprotein (a) [apo (a)] isoforms in subjects with type II diabetes mellitus was not unusual and the apo (a) isoform patterns did not change with improved metabolic control. Although the number of subjects was small, there was no decline in Lp(a) concentrations with improved control and thus the effect of glycemic control on Lp(a) concentrations may be much smaller in type II than in type I diabetes. These results suggest that diabetic subjects with elevated Lp(a) concentrations should have intensive management of conventional cardiovascular risk factors such as high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDLC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLC), and blood pressure.     

Lipoprotein(a): an elusive cardiovascular risk factor

Lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)], is present only in humans, Old World nonhuman primates, and the European hedgehog. Lp(a) has many properties in common with low-density lipoprotein (LDL) but contains a unique protein, apo(a), which is structurally different from other apolipoproteins. The size of the apo(a) gene is highly variable, resulting in the protein molecular weight ranging from 300 to 800 kDa; this large variation may be caused by neutral evolution in the absence of any selection advantage. Apo(a) influences to a major extent metabolic and physicochemical properties of Lp(a), and the size polymorphism of the apo(a) gene contributes to the pronounced heterogeneity of Lp(a). There is an inverse relationship between apo(a) size and Lp(a) levels; however, this pattern is complex. For a given apo(a) size, there is a considerable variation in Lp(a) levels across individuals, underscoring the importance to assess allele-specific Lp(a) levels. Further, Lp(a) levels differ between populations, and blacks have generally higher levels than Asians and whites, adjusting for apo(a) sizes. In addition to the apo(a) size polymorphism, an upstream pentanucleotide repeat (TTTTA(n)) affects Lp(a) levels. Several meta-analyses have provided support for an association between Lp(a) and coronary artery disease, and the levels of Lp(a) carried in particles with smaller size apo(a) isoforms are associated with cardiovascular disease or with preclinical vascular changes. Further, there is an interaction between Lp(a) and other risk factors for cardiovascular disease. The physiological role of Lp(a) is unknown, although a majority of studies implicate Lp(a) as a risk factor.     

Apolipoprotein(a) size polymorphism is associated with coronary heart disease in polygenic hypercholesterolemia

BACKGROUND AND AIM: In addition to high serum cholesterol levels, various cardiovascular risk factors may be involved in the development of coronary heart disease (CHD) in hypercholesterolemic subjects. As the levels of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], an important and independent cardiovascular risk factor, are high in polygenic hypercholesterolemia (PH), we investigated plasma Lp(a) levels and apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] phenotypes in relation to occurrence of CHD events in PH patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Lp(a) levels and apo(a) isoforms were determined in 191 PH patients, 83 normocholesterolemic subjects with CHD, and 94 normocholesterolemic controls without CHD. Lp(a) levels were similar in the hypercholesterolemic subjects with (n=100) or without CHD (n=91): 21.4 (range 6.6-59.23) vs 18.5 (range 5.25-57.25) mg/dL (p=NS). Low molecular weight apo(a) isoforms were more prevalent (55%) in the PH patients with CHD, whereas high molecular weight apo(a) isoforms were more prevalent (62.6%) in those without CHD: this difference was significant (p<0.05). A stepwise multiple-discriminant analysis made in order to determine the independence of common cardiovascular risk factors, Lp(a) levels and low molecular weight apo(a) isoforms in predicting CHD among hypercholesterolemic subjects showed that the presence of a positive family history of CHD, smoking, age, and the presence of at least one apo(a) isoform of low molecular weight were independently associated with CHD. CONCLUSIONS: Despite high Lp(a) levels, our findings do not support the hypothesis that Lp(a) plays an independent role in determining clinical CHD in PH subjects. However, the presence of at least one low molecular weight apo(a) isoform is an independent genetic predictor of CHD in hypercholesterolemic subjects. Together with other cardiovascular risk factors, apo(a) phenotypes should be assessed to evaluate the overall CHD risk status of all subjects with high serum cholesterol levels.     

Transgenic rabbits expressing human apolipoprotein (a).

Elevated plasma levels of lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] constitutes an independent risk factor for coronary heart disease, stroke, and restenosis. Over the past years, our understanding of the genetics, metabolism and pathophysiology of Lp(a) have increased considerably. However, the precise mechanism(s) by which this atherogenic lipoprotein mediates the development of atherosclerosis remains unclear. This is partly due to the lack of appropriate animal models since apolipoprotein (a) [apo(a)], a distinct component of Lp(a) is found only in primates and humans. Development of transgenic mice expressing human apo(a) has provided an alternative means to investigate many aspects of Lp(a). However, human apo(a) in transgenic mice can not bind to murine apoB to form Lp(a) particles. In this aspect, we generated transgenic rabbits expressing human apo(a). In the plasma of transgenic rabbits, unlike the plasma of transgenic mice, about 80% of the apo(a) was associated with rabbit apo B and was contained in the fractions with density 1.02-1.10 g/ml, indicating the formation of Lp(a). Our study suggests that transgenic rabbits expressing human apo(a) exhibit efficient assembly of Lp(a) and can be used as an animal model for the study of human Lp(a).     

Experimental Animal Models Evaluating the Causal Role of Lipoprotein(a) in Atherosclerosis and Aortic Stenosis

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], comprised of apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] and a low-density lipoprotein-like particle, is a genetically determined, causal risk factor for cardiovascular disease and calcific aortic valve stenosis. Lp(a) is the major plasma lipoprotein carrier of oxidized phospholipids, is pro-inflammatory, inhibits plasminogen activation, and promotes smooth muscle cell proliferation, as defined mostly through in vitro studies. Although Lp(a) is not expressed in commonly studied laboratory animals, mouse and rabbit models transgenic for Lp(a) and apo(a) have been developed to address their pathogenicity in vivo. These models have provided significant insights into the pathophysiology of Lp(a), particularly in understanding the mechanisms of Lp(a) in mediating atherosclerosis. Studies in Lp(a)-transgenic mouse models have demonstrated that apo(a) is retained in atheromas and suggest that it promotes fatty streak formation. Furthermore, rabbit models have shown that Lp(a) promotes atherosclerosis and vascular calcification. However, many of these models have limitations. Mouse models need to be transgenic for both apo(a) and human apolipoprotein B-100 since apo(a) does not covalently associated with mouse apoB to form Lp(a). In established mouse and rabbit models of atherosclerosis, Lp(a) levels are low, generally <20 mg/dL, which is considered to be within the normal range in humans. Furthermore, only one apo(a) isoform can be expressed in a given model whereas over 40 isoforms exist in humans. Mouse models should also ideally be studied in an LDL receptor negative background for atherosclerosis studies, as mice don’t develop sufficiently elevated plasma cholesterol to study atherosclerosis in detail. With recent data that cardiovascular disease and calcific aortic valve stenosis is causally mediated by the LPA gene, development of optimized Lp(a)-transgenic animal models will provide an opportunity to further understand the mechanistic role of Lp(a) in atherosclerosis and aortic stenosis and provide a platform to test novel therapies for cardiovascular disease.     

Is Lipoprotein(a) an Independent Risk Factor for Ischemic Heart Disease in Men? The Quebec Cardiovascular Study

Objectives. This study was undertaken to determine whether lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is an independent risk factor for ischemic heart disease (IHD) and to establish the relation of Lp(a) to the other lipid fractions.Background. Several, but not all, studies have shown that elevated Lp(a) concentrations may be associated with IHD; very few have been prospective.Methods. A 5-year prospective follow-up study was conducted in 2,156 French Canadian men 47 to 76 years old, without clinical evidence of IHD. Lipid measurements obtained at baseline included total cholesterol, low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, apoprotein B and Lp(a). During the follow-up period, there were 116 first IHD events (myocardial infarction, angina, death). Adjusted proportional hazards models were used to estimate the relative risk for the different variables. The cohort was also classified according to Lp(a) levels and other lipid risk factor tertiles to evaluate the relation of elevated Lp(a) levels to these risk factors. A cutoff value of 30 mg/dl was used for Lp(a). Risk ratios were calculated using the group with low Lp(a) levels and the first tertile of lipid measures as a reference.Results. Lp(a) was not an independent risk factor for IHD but seemed to increase the deleterious effects of mildly elevated LDL cholesterol and elevated total cholesterol and apoprotein B levels and seemed to counteract the beneficial effects associated with elevated HDL cholesterol levels.Conclusions. In this cohort, Lp(a) was not an independent risk factor for IHD but appeared to increase the risk associated with other lipid risk factors.     

Longitudinal Assessment of Lipoprotein(a) Levels in Perinatally HIV-Infected Children and Adolescents

HIV is an independent risk factor of cardiovascular disease (CVD); therefore, perinatally HIV-infected (PHIV) children potentially have a greater CVD risk at older age. Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is an established risk factor for CVD in the general population. To evaluate a potential increased CVD risk for PHIV children, we determined their lipid profiles including Lp(a). In the first substudy, we assessed the lipid profiles of 36 PHIV children visiting the outpatient clinic in Amsterdam between 2012 and 2020. In the second substudy, we enrolled 21 PHIV adolescents and 23 controls matched for age, sex and ethnic background on two occasions with a mean follow-up time of 4.6 years. We assessed trends of lipid profiles and their determinants, including patient and disease characteristics, using mixed models. In the first substudy, the majority of PHIV children were Black (92%) with a median age of 8.0y (5.7–10.8) at first assessment. Persistent elevated Lp(a) levels were present in 21/36 (58%) children (median: 374 mg/L (209–747); cut off = 300). In the second substudy, the median age of PHIV adolescents was 17.5y (15.5–20.7) and of matched controls 16.4y (15.8–19.5) at the second assessment. We found comparable lipid profiles between groups. In both studies, increases in LDL-cholesterol and total cholesterol were associated with higher Lp(a) levels. A majority of PHIV children and adolescents exhibited elevated Lp(a) levels, probably associated with ethnic background. Nonetheless, these elevated Lp(a) levels may additionally contribute to an increased CVD risk.     

Does apolipoprotein(a) heterogeneity influence lipoprotein(a) effects on fibrinolysis?

High plasma levels of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] are considered to be an independent risk factor for premature cardiovascular disease and are inversely associated with apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] isoform sizes. The contribution of apo(a) polymorphism to the inhibition of fibrinolysis, a mechanism that may favor thrombus development, was therefore evaluated by measuring the ability of Lp(a) particles of distinct apo(a) isoform content to compete with plasminogen for fibrin binding during plasminogen activation by fibrin-bound tissue-type plasminogen activator. The rate of plasmin generation was most efficiently inhibited by an isoform with a molecular weight (M(r)) of approximately 540 Kd. An isoform with M(r) approximately 590 Kd produced a less pronounced effect, whereas the isoform with M(r) approximately 610 Kd failed to inhibit plasminogen activation. These effects were directly proportional to the amount of Lp(a) bound to the carboxy-terminal lysine residues of degraded fibrin. The relative affinity of the binding (kd range, 16 to 180 nmol/L) reflected the ability of individual Lp(a) isoforms to inhibit the binding of plasminogen (kd, 600 nmol/L). The question of the influence of kringle sequence variability on the binding to fibrin was not addressed by the present work. These data suggest that apo(a) isoform types with high affinity for fibrin may influence the ability of Lp(a) to interfere with fibrinolysis and contribute thereby to the association of elevated levels of Lp(a) with atherosclerotic and thrombotic risks.     

Transgenic rabbits expressing human apolipoprotein(a) develop more extensive atherosclerotic lesions in response to a cholesterol-rich diet

High lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] levels constitute an independent risk factor for the development of atherosclerosis. However, the relationship between Lp(a) and atherosclerosis is not fully understood. To examine the effect of Lp(a) on the development of atherosclerosis, we studied transgenic rabbits expressing human apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)], which was assembled into Lp(a) in the plasma. Human apo(a) transgenic rabbits fed a 0.3% cholesterol diet for 16 weeks had more extensive atherosclerotic lesions than did nontransgenic rabbits, although the cholesterol levels in the plasma of both groups were similarly elevated. Compared with the lesions in control rabbits, the areas of the atherosclerotic lesions in human apo(a) transgenic rabbits were significantly increased in the aorta, the iliac artery, and the carotid artery. Furthermore, human apo(a) transgenic rabbits on a cholesterol-rich diet had a greater degree of coronary atherosclerosis than did control rabbits. Immunohistochemical analysis revealed that human apo(a) was frequently deposited in the atherosclerotic lesions of transgenic rabbits. We conclude that Lp(a) may have proatherogenic effects in the setting of a cholesterol-rich diet in transgenic rabbits.     

Serum lipoprotein(a) concentrations and apolipoprotein(a) phenotypes in the families of NIDDM patients

Summary We studied the quantitative and qualitative characteristics of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] as a function of apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] phenotype in 87 members (42 males, 45 females) of 20 diabetic families, 26 of whom were diagnosed with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) with moderate glycaemic control (HbA_1c7.1±1.2%). Apo(a) phenotyping was performed by a sensitive, high-resolution technique using SDS-agarose/gradient PAGE (3–6%). To date, 26 different apo(a) phenotypes, including a null type, have been identified. Serum Lp(a) levels of NIDDM patients and non-diabetic members of the same family who had the same apo(a) phenotypes were compared, while case control subjects were chosen from high-Lp(a) non-diabetic and low-Lp(a) non-diabetic groups with the same apo(a) phenotypes in the same family. Serum Lp(a) levels were significantly higher in NIDDM patients than in non-diabetic subjects (39.8±33.3 vs 22.3±19.5 mg/dl, p<0.05). The difference in the mean Lp(a) level between the diabetic and non-diabetic groups was significantly (p<0.05) greater than that between the high-Lp(a) non-diabetic and low-Lp(a) non-diabetic groups. An analysis of covariance and a least square means comparison indicated that the regression line between serum Lp(a) levels [log Lp(a)] and apo(a) phenotypes in the diabetic patient group was significantly (p<0.01) elevated for each apo(a) phenotype, compared to the regression line of the control group. These data, together with our previous findings that serum Lp(a) levels are genetically controlled by apo(a) phenotypes, suggest that Lp(a) levels in diabetic patients are not regulated by smaller apo(a) isoforms, and that serum Lp(a) levels are greater in diabetic patients than in non-diabetic family members, even when they share the same apo(a) phenotypes.Abbreviations Lp(a) Lipoprotein(a) - apo(a) apolipoprotein(a) - NIDDM non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus - TC total cholesterol - LDL low density lipoprotein - TG triglycerides - HDL-C high density lipoprotein-cholesterol - LDL-C low density lipoprotein-cholesterol - PBS phosphate buffered saline The first two authors contributed equally to this work     

Serum lipids, lipoprotein(a) level, and apolipoprotein(a) isoforms as prognostic markers in patients with coronary heart disease

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to study prognostic factors for death in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD), focusing on serum lipids and lipoproteins. DESIGN AND SUBJECTS: The study subjects were 964 patients with angina pectoris who underwent coronary angiography between 1985 and 1987. Follow-up, including survival and cause of death, was carried out in April 1998. RESULTS: A total of 363 patients died. Increasing age, diabetes and low levels of HDL cholesterol and of apolipoprotein (apo) AI were associated with increased risk of total mortality and cardiac mortality. In men, low levels of LDL cholesterol and of apoB were associated with increased risk of death, but not of cardiac death only; high levels of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] were not associated with increased risk. In women, however, there was a trend towards increased risk with increasing Lp(a) levels (P = 0.054); the smallest isoform of apo(a) was associated with a twofold increase in risk. In women, but not in men, risk decreased with increasing molecular weight of the apo(a) isoforms. CONCLUSIONS: Amongst lipoprotein variables, low levels of HDL cholesterol and of apoAI and the presence of low-molecular weight isoforms of apo(a) are associated with increased risk of death in patients with CHD. Apo(a) isoforms and Lp(a) levels seem to be more important as risk factors amongst women. Low LDL cholesterol and apoB levels were associated with increased risk, but only in men. These findings demonstrate the importance of a gender-specific analysis of risk factors for CHD.     

Sequence polymorphisms in the apolipoprotein(a) gene and their association with lipoprotein(a) levels and myocardial infarction. The ECTIM Study.

Lp(a) concentrations are largely determined by apo(a) isoform size, but several studies have shown that apo(a) isoforms could not entirely explain the increase of Lp(a) levels observed in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD). Since up to 90% of the variance in Lp(a) levels has been suggested to be attributable to the apo(a) locus, the hypothesis that polymorphisms of the apo(a) gene other than size could contribute to the increase of Lp(a) levels in CHD patients must be considered. This hypothesis was tested in the ECTIM Study comparing 594 patients with myocardial infarction and 682 control subjects in Northern Ireland and France. In addition to apo(a) phenotyping, five previously described polymorphisms of the apo(a) gene were genotyped: a (TTTTA)n repeat at position -1400 from the ATG, a G/A at -914, a C/T at -49, a G/A at -21 and a Met/Thr affecting amino acid 4168. As reported earlier [Parra HJ, Evans AE, Cambou JP, Amouyel P, Bingham A, McMaster D, Schaffer P, Douste-Blazy P, Luc G, Richard JL, Ducimetiere P, Fruchart JC, Cambien F. A case-control study of lipoprotein particles in two populations at contrasting risk for coronary heart disease. The ECTIM study. Arterioscler Thromb 1992; 12:701-707], mean Lp(a) levels were higher in cases than in controls (20.7 vs 14.6 mg/dl in Belfast, 17.2 vs 8.9 mg/dl in France, P < 0.001 for case-control and population differences). In the present study, mean apo(a) isoform size differed significantly between cases and controls (25.7 vs 26.6 kr in Belfast, 25.9 vs 27.4 kr in France, P < 0.001 for case-control and P = 0.13 for population difference). After adjustment for apo(a) isoforms, Lp(a) levels remained significantly higher in cases than in controls (difference, 4.6 mg/dl; P < 0.001). Genotype and allele frequencies did not differ significantly between cases and controls for any of the five polymorphisms studied. The five polymorphisms were in strong linkage disequilibrium and had a combined heterozygosity of 0.83. In multivariate regression analysis adjusted for apo(a) isoforms, only the (TTTTA)n polymorphism was significantly associated with Lp(a) levels; it explained 4.5% of Lp(a) variability in cases and 3.1% in controls. The Lp(a) case/control difference was not reduced after taking into account the (TTTTA)n effect. We conclude that the increase of Lp(a) levels observed in MI cases, and which was not directly attributable to apo(a) size variation, was not related to the five polymorphisms of the apo(a) gene considered.