Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting/beating coronary artery bypass grafting for a patient with low left ventricular ejection fraction

Beating coronary artery bypass grafting could be performed for a 47-year-old man with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 9.3%. Post-operative LVEF was improved to 51.6%. Conventional coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) used to be contraindicative for patients with LVEF below 20%. Recently, such patients are involved to indication of off-pump CABG (OPCAB) or beating CABG, because we consider OPCAB are lower complications than conventional CABG. We were able to bypass the circumflex for the patient while we had been used percutaneous cardio-pulmonary support (PCPS). We could perform beating coronary artery bypass grafting for a patient of the low LVEF.     

体外循环与非体外循环下冠脉搭桥术患者术中血液动力学的比较

目的比较体外循环(CPB)与非CPB下冠脉搭桥术患者术中血液动力学的变化。方法同期行CPB下冠状动脉搭桥术(CABG)与非CPB下冠状动脉搭桥术(OPCAB)患者各70例,分别为CABG组和OPCAB组,分别在麻醉诱导后手术开始前(术前)和术毕用Swan-Ganz导管监测血液动力学指标。结果与术前比较,两组术毕心率(HR)、平均动脉压(MAP)、肺动脉平均压(PAMP)、肺毛细血管嵌压(PAWP)、中心静脉压(CVP)及左室作功指数(LVSWI)差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),心输出量(CO)、心脏指数(CI)均升高;OPCAB组术毕心搏指数(SVI)升高,体循环阻力指数(SVRI)、肺循环阻力指数(PVRI)降低(P<0.05),CABG组术毕SVI、SVRI、PVRI差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);与CABG组比较,OPCAB组术毕SVRI、PVRI降低(P<0.05)。结论两组患者术后心功能均得到了改善,OPCAB 组在改善心功能、降低体、肺循环阻力方面,优于CABG组。     

冠心病手术方式对IABP应用的影响

目的:探讨冠心病手术方式对主动脉内球囊反搏(intra-aortic balloon pump,IABP)的影响。方法;冠心病手术176例,27例为非体外循环心脏跳动下的手术。在149例体外循环(cardio-pulmonary bypass,CPB)下的手术中,单纯冠状动脉搭桥(coronary artery bypass grafting,CABG)35例,CABG 激光心肌血管重建(Transmyocardial Laser Revascularization,TMLR)联合手术114例,其中29例加做室壁瘤切除、室间隔穿孔修补、瓣膜置换手术,9例于术中安置临时心外膜起搏器。结果:149例体外循环下的手术中共置入IABP23例,其中120例常规手术组中应用IABP15例,29例有附加手术组中应用IABP8例,而27例非体外循环下的手术中无IABP的应用。结论:(1)应用LABP数量在常规手术组与术中加做室壁瘤切除、瓣膜置换术或成型术、室间隔穿孔修补术(p<0.05),安置临时心外膜起搏器(P<0.01),组比较结果均有统计学意义;(2)激光心肌血管重建术,无论与何种冠心病手术联合应用,无论激光打孔数量多少,都没有增加IABP的应用;(3)未发现冠脉搭桥数量与IABP有关。     

70岁以上患者不停跳冠状动脉搭桥术的临床分析

目的　探讨 70岁以上患者冠状动脉外科治疗的术式选择及不停跳搭桥术的安全性。方法　选择我科 1997年 9月至 2 0 0 3年 2月完成的≥ 70岁行不停跳搭桥术治疗患者 6 3例 ,分别与同期同一年龄组行单纯常规搭桥术的 94例患者及同期 <70岁行不停跳搭桥术的 5 8例患者进行比较、分析。结果　在术后正性肌力药物的使用率 (12例、19%与 34例、36 % )、输血率 (47例、75 %与 81例、86 % )、二次开胸率 (0例、0与 4例、4 % )、辅助呼吸时间 [(8± 6 )h与 (16± 12 )h]、院内病死率 (1例、2 %与 4例、4 % )等方面 ,≥ 70岁患者的不停跳搭桥术均优于常规搭桥术 ;≥ 70岁与 <70岁患者不停跳搭桥的术后并发症发生率 (19%与 19% )及院内病死率 (1例、2 %与 1例、2 % )差异无显著意义。结论　与行常规冠状动脉搭桥术的患者相比 ,高龄患者进行不停跳搭桥术有明显的优越性。对高龄患者行不停跳搭桥术 ,安全、临床效果确切     

Off-pump coronary artery bypass for old myocardial infarction associated with jejunotomy for obstructive ileus due to gall bladder stone; report of a case

In non-cardiac operative cases with inflammatory digestive organ disease, bacterial translocation (BT) often results from non-enteral nutrition postoperatively. If coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is performed in the case having old myocardial infarction (OMI) and inflammatory digestive organ disease at first before non-cardiac operation, he seems vulnerable to have severe complications such as multiple organ failure due to systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and preexisting BT postoperatively. We performed a off-pump CABG (OPCAB) for OMI associated with jejunotomy for obstructive ileus due to gall bladder stone. No complication was found in the postoperative course. We conclude that combined operation, non-cardiac surgery after OPCAB is worth considering in those cases. And we think OPCAB is better than conventional CABG in such cases, because cardiopulmonary bypass is known to ponder comparable damages to immune system, coagulation system and others.     

老年人非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术的心肌保护作用

目的比较70岁以上老年人非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术(OPCAB)和体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)围术期心肌损伤程度,探讨OPCAB的心肌保护效果。方法30例老年患者分为两组,A组15例,为CABG组,B组15例,为OPCAB组。分别于术前、术中30min、术中1h、术后6h、12h、24h、72h、120h取静脉血标本,分别测定心肌肌钙蛋白I(cTnI)水平和CKMB活性;另外记录围手术期各项临床指标。结果OPCAB组术后辅助呼吸时间较CABG组短(P<0.01),而且主动脉球囊反搏和输血例数较低(P<0.05)。CABG组与OPCAB组cTnI、CKMB的术前水平相,术后6hcTnI即有升高而后下降,术后30min至72h均较OPCAB组明显升高(P<0.05或0.01)。结论与CABG相比,OPCAB的心肌损伤较轻,心肌保护效果较好。     

Safe evolution towards routine off-pump coronary artery bypass: negotiating the learning curve

Objective: Off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) hopes to avoid morbidity associated with cardiopulmonary bypass, improving clinical outcomes. Yet its technical difficulty and unfamiliarity raise concern that adoption of OPCAB might be associated with poorer outcomes during each surgeon's ‘learning curve’. We examined trends in patient selection over time as a single surgeon's practice evolved to routine OPCAB. Methods: Between 10-1-96 and 12-31-01, 1479 consecutive patients had isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Clinical data were gathered prospectively and reviewed retrospectively. Trends in adoption of OPCAB and clinical outcomes were examined. Results: There were 756 OPCAB and 723 CABG/cardiopulmonary bypass patients. The practice evolved from 90% conventional CABG to 93% OPCAB. An abrupt transition coincided with evolution of techniques to expose the obtuse marginal arteries, and improvements in suction-based coronary stabilizers. Mortality was 1.0% for the off-pump group and 2.1% for the on-pump group. Careful patient selection helped maintain acceptable outcomes during the ‘learning curve’. Patients with depressed left ventricular ejection fraction, left main disease, and complex three vessel disease were excluded from OPCAB until significant experience (>200 cases) was attained. Presently, all isolated coronary bypass cases are candidates for OPCAB except patients with ischemic ventricular arrhythmias, those in cardiac arrest, and those for whom previous left pneumonectomy or deep pectus excavatum prevent rightward mobilization of heart. Conclusions: Despite a significant learning curve, evolution to routine OPCAB can be achieved while maintaining good patient outcomes. The development of specialized techniques, coronary stabilizers, and apical suction devices allows the application of OPCAB to virtually all coronary bypass patients, as surgeon experience matures.     

糖尿病病人行OPCAB与CCABG的早期结果对比

目的 比较糖尿病病人非体外循环和经典体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植(OPCAB和CCABG)的术后早期临床结果.方法 1999年4月至2008年1月,318例糖尿病病人行冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG).OPCAB 210例,CCABG 108例.两组术前总体情况差异无统计学意义.OPCAB在非体外循环、心脏跳动下完成,CCABG在体外循环、心脏停跳下完成.正中开胸,胸膜外游离带蒂左乳内动脉(LIMA),与左前降支(LAD)吻合,大隐静脉(GSV)与其他靶血管吻合,吻合口超过2个采用序贯吻合.术前口服降糖药或皮下注射胰岛素将血糖控制在6 mmol/L以下,术后早期在ICU时持续泵入胰岛素,将血糖控制在6～8mmol/L.结果 两组共5例(1.57%)死亡,7例(2.20%)发生并发症.两组均达到完全再血管化,平均移植旁路血管OPCAB组(2.6±1.1)支,低于CCABG组的(3.1±1.3)支,P＜0.05.OWCAB组死亡1例(0.48%),明显低于CCABG组4例(3.70%),P＜0.05.OPCAB组发生并发症5例(2.30%),CCABG组2例(1.85%),组间差异无统计学意义,P＞0.05.结论 糖尿病者冠状动脉旁路移植手术围术期严格控制血糖至接近正常水平,住院病死率和并发症率低.OWAB术后早期病死率明显低于CCABG.     

Staged operation of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting using aortic connector system, and concomitant surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysm and gastric cancer; report of a case

Recently the patient of the atherosclerotic disease associated with malignant disease has been increased. A 75-year-old man was referred to our section with an infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) and a gastric cancer (GC). Preoperative coronary angiogram revealed the significant stenoses of the right coronary and the left anterior descending coronary artery. We selected the staged operation of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) [OPCAB] and the concomitant surgery for the AAA and the GC. Operative invasion could decrease with the surgical procedure of the OPCAB and the concomitant surgery compared to the conventional CABG or the separate operation. We used the aortic connector system during OPCAB to prevent such the serious complications of the aortic dissection or the systemic embolism due to the calcified ascending aorta.     

Off-pump coronary revascularization: current state of the art

Patients presenting for surgical coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) are older and have more comorbidity than patients in prior decades. Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) may add to the elevated morbidity and mortality seen in these higher-risk patients. After the re-introduction of single-vessel bypass without CPB, surgeons have developed techniques for multivessel off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) through sternotomy. Understanding the causes of the hemodynamic disturbances seen during cardiac displacement has led to surgical techniques that minimize mechanical compression and the effects of temporary regional ischemia. With careful attention to detail, OPCAB has been shown to be feasible in nearly all patients needing coronary artery bypass. The procedure has been demonstrated to be safe and effective. Early outcomes and graft patency rates appear to be at least as good as those seen with traditional CPB-supported CABG. Certain high-risk groups may be better treated with OPCAB, but further studies are necessary to elucidate which patients should be offered OPCAB and which should receive standard CABG.     

Current status of coronary artery bypass grafting

The number of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has reached more than 21,000 cases per year in Japan, and the operative mortality has decreased less than 1% including emergent operation. There are 2 trends in CABG. One is the revival and wide spread of off-pump CABG (OPCAB). The other is multiple arterial coronary revascularization. In 2004 and 2005, 60% of all CABG procedures in Japan were performed without cardiopulmonary bypass. For competition with percutaneous coronary intervention with drug eluting stents and better long-term outcomes, CABG with only arterial grafts was carried out in 52% of total cases and 66% of OPCAB cases. OPCAB with multiple arterial grafts has been becoming the standard CABG in Japan. We reviewed OPCAB and arterial CABG including new technology.     

Off-pump surgery decreases postoperative complications and resource utilization in the elderly.

BACKGROUND: Bypass surgery in the elderly (age >70 years) has increased mortality and morbidity, which may be a consequence of cardiopulmonary bypass. We compare the outcomes of a cohort of elderly off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) patients with elderly conventional coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) patients. METHODS: Chart and provincial cardiac care registry data were reviewed for 30 consecutive elderly OPCAB patients (age 74.7 +/- 4.2 years) and 60 consecutive CABG patients (age 74.9 +/- 4.1 years, p = 0.82) with similar risk factor profiles: Parsonnet score 17.2 +/- 8.1 (OPCAB) versus 15.6 +/- 6.5 (CABG), p = 0.31; and Ontario provincial acuity index 4.5 +/- 1.9 (OPCAB) versus 4.3 +/- 2.0 (CABG), p = 0.65. RESULTS: Mean hospital stay was 6.3 +/- 1.8 days for OPCAB patients and 7.7 +/- 3.9 days for CABG patients (p < 0.05). Average intensive care unit stay was 24.0 +/- 10.9 h for OPCAB patients versus 36.6 +/- 33.5 h for CABG patients (p < 0.05). Atrial fibrillation occurred in 10.0% of OPCAB patients and 28.3% of CABG patients (p < 0.05). Low output syndrome was observed in 10% of OPCAB patients and 31.7% of CABG patients (p < 0.05). Cost was reduced by $1,082 (Canadian) per patient in the OPCAB group. Postoperative OPCAB graft analysis showed 100% patency. CONCLUSIONS: OPCAB is safe in the geriatric population and significantly reduces postoperative morbidity and cost.     

Coronary vasospasm during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting; report of two cases

Coronary vasospasm is one of the most dangerous and fatal complications of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) operation. Our experiences in recent 2 cases happened during off-pump CABG (OPCAB) are presented. Case 1: A 63-year-old male who had 3 vessels disease underwent OPCAB using left internal thoracic artery (LITA) and the radial artery. When the sternotomy was going to be closed, ST elevation of electrocardiogram (ECG) occurred and was followed by ventricular fibrillation. Intra-aortic balloon pumping (IABP) and percutaneous cardiopulmonary support (PCPS) were applied immediately and an additional grafting to first diagonal artery (D 1) was carried out using a saphenous vein. Case 2: A 67-year-old male underwent OPCAB using LITA and the radial artery. ST elevation of ECG suddenly occurred and was followed by complete atrio-ventricular (AV) block when the sternum was closed. IABP and the ventricular pacing were applied immediately. While OPCAB may be less invasive operating method than conventional CABG, we should pay more attention to the coronary vasospasm.     

Beating heart coronary artery bypass grafting for acute myocardial infarction

We consider that off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) [OPCAB], which results in local myocardial ischemia, is more effective for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) than conventional CABG under cardiac arrest with global myocardial ischemia. Twenty-one patients (15 males, 6 females) received OPCAB for AMI, among whom surgery was performed following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) failure in 4 and PCI was performed prior to OPCAB in 2, while PCI was not performed in the remaining 15. Preoperatively, 16 patients had intraaortic balloon pumping (IABP), and 4 had IABP and percutaneous cardiopulmonary support (PCPS). The mean interval from onset to surgery was 11.7 (range 3 to 40) hours. In 20 cases, a complete revascularization was performed. The mean number of bypasses was 2.3 and OPCAB was carried out in 14 patients. In 2 cases, OPCAB was converted to on-pump beating CABG for complete revascularization. Fourteen patients (67%), each maintained with preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction (EF), were discharged with an elective bypass. Four patients died after on-pump beating CABG, in whom EF was lower than 10%. In addition, 3 died of low cardiac output syndrome (LOS) under PCPS and 1 of ventricular fibrillation. Based on our results, we considered that complete revascularization using OPCAB was effective for cases of AMI with PCI difficulty. However, in shock cases requiring PCPS, cardiac function was not improved even after revascularization. Therefore, it is necessary to study new procedures for shock cases during the period from onset to surgery.     

Coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with dialysis-dependent renal failure

From January 1995 to May 2003, 36 patients with dialysis-dependent renal failure underwent coronary artery bypass grafting. We performed the operation with cardiopulmonary bypass (group On) in 17 cases and without cardiopulmonary bypass (group Off) in 19 patients [off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) 15, minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) 4]. There were no statistical differences regarding mean age, sex, duration of dialysis, preoperative hypertension, diabetes and peripheral and cerebral vascular diseases. Mean operation time and the number of bypass grafts were 315 +/- 53 minutes, 2.8 +/- 0.8 grafts in group On and 284 +/- 78 minutes, 2.4 +/- 1.1 grafts in group Off, respectively (not significant). Seventeen patients (100%) of group On and 12 patients (63%) needed blood transfusion. Hospital stay after operation was significantly longer in group On (40 days) of group Off than that in group Off (26 days). After the operation, continuous hemodiafiltration (CHDF) was used in 10 cases (59%) in group On and 3 cases (16%) in group Off. In coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) on dialysis patient, it is very effective to have various operation techniques, such as off-pump bypass and on-pump beating bypass. Also control of water-electrolyte balance using early postoperative CHDF is useful. However, off-pump cases could be controlled by conventional hemodialysis.     

Surgical revascularization in patients with poor left ventricular function: on- or off-pump?

BACKGROUND: Patients with left ventricular dysfunction and low ejection fraction (EF) are at high-risk of complication and mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The potential success of off-pump CABG in this high-risk population has yet to be determined. The purpose of this study is to compare the outcome of off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) and conventional coronary artery bypass (CCAB) in patients with poor left ventricular function, all from a single institution. METHODS: Data on patient demographics, preoperative risk factors, operative and postoperative outcomes were collected retrospectively on all patients having undergone isolated CABG between January 1, 1998, and October 31, 2001. RESULTS: A total of 77 patients (31 OPCAB/46 CCAB) were identified as having an ejection fraction (EF) of < or = 0.35. Of these, 52 had EF < or = 0.30 (21 OPCAB/31 CCAB) and 31 patients had EF < or = 0.25 (10 OPCAB/21 CCAB). Operative mortality was 3.2% after the OPCAB procedure versus 10.9% for the CCAB (p = 0.39). Use of intraaortic balloon pump (6.5%) was rarely required. The OPCAB procedure resulted in significantly less requirement for blood transfusions (p < 0.05), fewer distal anastomoses per patient (p < 0.01), and a higher incidence of atrial fibrillation (p < 0.05) compared with CCAB. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with poor left ventricular function may undergo surgical revascularization using off-pump technique with relatively good results and low mortality levels. The lower number of grafts performed on the off-pump procedure did not seem to affect clinical outcomes.     

Clinical outcomes, angiographic patency, and resource utilization in 200 consecutive off-pump coronary bypass patients

BACKGROUND: This retrospective study compared clinical outcomes and resource utilization in patients having off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) versus conventional coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Angiographic patency was documented in the OPCAB group. METHODS: From April 1997 through November 1999, OPCAB was performed in 200 consecutive patients, and the results were compared with those in a contemporaneous matched control group of 1,000 patients undergoing CABG. Patients were matched according to age, sex, preexisting disease (renal failure, diabetes, pulmonary disease, stroke, hypertension, peripheral vascular disease, previous myocardial infarction, and primary or redo status. Follow-up in the OPCAB patients was 93% and averaged 13.4 months. RESULTS: Hospital death (1.0%), postoperative stroke (1.5%), myocardial infarction (1.0%), and re-entry for bleeding (1.5%) occurred infrequently in the OPCAB group. There were reductions in the rates of transfusion (33.0% versus 70.0%; p < 0.001) and deep sternal wound infection (0% versus 2.2%; p = 0.067) in the OPCAB group compared with the CABG group. Angiographic assessment of 421 grafted arteries was performed in 167 OPCAB patients (83.5%) prior to hospital discharge. All but five were patent (98.8%) (93.3% FitzGibbon A, 5.5% FitzGibbon B, 1.2% FitzGibbon O). All 163 internal mammary artery grafts were patent. Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting reduced postoperative hospital stay from 5.7 +/- 5.3 days in the CABG group to 3.9 +/- 2.6 days (p < 0.001), with a decrease in hospital cost of 15.0% (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting reduces hospital cost, postoperative length of stay, and morbidity compared with CABG on cardiopulmonary bypass. Off-pump coronary bypass grafting is safe, cost effective, and associated with excellent graft patency and clinical outcomes.     

Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in Japan

The number of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) procedures has reached more than 20,000 per year in Japan, and the operative mortality rate has decreased to less than 1.5% including emergent surgery. The mortality and morbidity rates of CABG are still high in patients with risk factors such as cerebrovascular disease, chronic renal failure on hemodialysis, atheromatous and calcified ascending aorta, and older age when cardiopulmonary bypass is used. Minimally invasive direct coronary bypass on a beating heart through a small left lateral anterior thoracotomy, in which the left internal thoracic artery (LITA) is used to revascularize the left anterior descending artery, was introduced for high-risk patients with single-vessel disease in the mid-1990s, although is not widely performed at present. Since the late 1990s off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) has been widely performed as a treatment for multivessel disease through a median sternotomy with the evolution of stabilizers and apical suction devices, refined anesthetic management, and sophisticated surgical techniques. In 2004, 60% of all CABG procedures in Japan were performed without cardiopulmonary bypass. Due to competition from percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents and better long-term outcomes, CABG with arterial grafts alone was carried out in 52% of total cases and in 66% of OPCAB cases. OPCAB is becoming the standard CABG in Japan.     

Off-pump coronary surgery: how do the anesthetic considerations differ?

In recent years, there has been much interest in performing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery without the aid of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Initial efforts focused on "minimally invasive" direct coronary artery bypass, wherein the left anterior descending artery is bypassed with an in situ left internal mammary artery graft through a small left anterior thoracotomy. A more widely adopted approach however, is off-pump CABG (OPCAB), in which CABG surgery is performed on one or more vessels through the usual median sternotomy approach without the aid of CPB. This article reviews the differences in the anesthetic considerations of OPCAB compared to conventional CABG using CPB.     

Benefits of off-pump bypass on neurologic and clinical morbidity: a prospective randomized trial

BACKGROUND: Neurologic and clinical morbidity after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) can be significant. By avoiding cardiopulmonary bypass, off-pump CABG (OPCAB) may reduce morbidity. METHODS: Sixty patients (30 CABG and 30 OPCAB) were prospectively randomized. Neurocognitive testing was performed before the operation and 2 weeks and 1 year after the operation. Neurologic testing to detect stroke and (99m)Tc-HMPAO whole-brain single photon emission computed tomography scanning to assess cerebral perfusion were performed before the operation and 3 days afterward. Bilateral middle cerebral artery transcranial Doppler scanning was performed intraoperatively to detect cerebral microemboli. All examiners were blinded to treatment group. Clinical morbidity and costs were compared. RESULTS: Coronary artery bypass grafting was associated with more cerebral microemboli (575 +/- 278.5 CABG versus 16.0 +/- 19.5 OPCAB (median +/- semiinterquartile range) and significantly reduced cerebral perfusion after the operation to the bilateral occipital, cerebellar, precunei, thalami, and left temporal lobes (p < or = 0.01). Cerebral perfusion with OPCAB was unchanged. Compared with base line, OPCAB patients performed better on the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (total and recognition scores) at both 2 weeks and at 1 year (p < or = 0.05), whereas CABG performance was statistically unchanged for all cognitive measures. Patients who underwent CABG had more chest tube drainage (1389 +/- 1256 mL CABG versus 789 +/- 586 mL OPCAB, p = 0.02) and required more blood (3.9 +/- 5.8 U CABG versus 1.2 +/- 2.2 U OPCAB, p = 0.02), fresh frozen plasma (3.0 +/- 6.0 U CABG versus 0.5 +/- 2.2 U OPCAB, p = 0.03), and hours of postoperative use of dopamine (16.3 +/- 21.2 hours CABG versus 7.3 +/- 9.7 hours OPCAB, p = 0.04). These differences culminated in higher costs for CABG ($23,053 +/- $5,320 CABG versus $17,780 +/- $4,390 OPCAB, p < 0.0001). One stroke occurred with CABG, compared with none with OPCAB (p = NS). One OPCAB patient died because of a pulmonary embolus (p = NS). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with CABG, OPCAB may reduce neurologic and clinical morbidity as well as cost.