"Unpredictable" late rupture of an abdominal aortic aneurysm after bifurcated Ancure endograft repair

The goal of endovascular repair of an abdominal aortic aneurysm is to exclude the aneurysm from systemic arterial pressure, thereby preventing rupture. However, the long-term durability of endovascular repair continues to be in question, as aneurysm rupture after endovascular repair continues to be reported. We report the case of an 89-year-old patient who underwent endovascular repair of a 7.1-cm abdominal aortic aneurysm with an Ancure endograft 5 years earlier. Despite close follow-up and a shrinking aneurysm sac on annual contrast-enhanced computed tomography, he presented with aneurysm rupture and a new proximal type I endoleak. The endoleak and rupture were successfully repaired with endovascular placement of a main body extension.     

Aortoduodenal fistula and associated rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysm after endoluminal stent graft repair

The main complications of endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms are vascular leaks and rupture, although infection and aortoduodenal fistulas have also been reported rarely. We report a case of aortoduodenal fistula with separate retroperitoneal rupture of an abdominal aortic aneurysm after endovascular stent graft repair. The initial implantation was uneventful, without any leaks at 1 month. The patient underwent open repair and did well. To our knowledge, this is the first case report of aortoduodenal fistula and associated retroperitoneal rupture of the aneurysm after endovascular stent graft repair of an abdominal aortic aneurysm.     

Combined emergency abdominal aortic aneurysm repair and valve replacement in a patient with severe aortic stenosis

Simultaneous open surgery has been advocated in the elective management of abdominal aortic aneurysm patients with significant ischemic heart disease, as staged procedures risk worsening myocardial ischemia or aortic rupture, depending on which is the first intervention. The argument for combined aneurysm and valve repair is less established. We describe the case of a 70-year-old female who while awaiting aortic valve replacement suffered rupture of an abdominal aortic aneurysm. The patient was successfully managed with emergency combined open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair and open aortic valve replacement. We would advocate that such a strategy be considered as a salvage technique in similarly difficult management dilemmas.     

Concomitant transabdominal MIDCAB and abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

We present 2 patients who underwent transabdominal minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass with the right gastroepiploic artery combined with abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. The surgical procedures, both performed through a median laparotomy, proved safe and of limited invasiveness. The one-stage surgical intervention prevented catastrophic complications, such as acute myocardial infarction or rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysm. We believe that concomitant transabdominal minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass and abdominal aortic aneurysm repair should be considered as a single combined surgical strategy in selected patients.     

Infrarenal rupture of an abdominal aortic aneurysm,previously repaired using an endoaneurysmorrhaphy technique

Unusual as well as well-known complications can occur after aortic reconstruction. In an effort to heighten awareness of these possibilities, a case is presented of a 71-year-old male who was brought to the emergency department with severe back pain of 2 days duration and hypotension. He had undergone repair of an infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm 6 years earlier. An emergency computed tomography scan demonstrated a 10-cm abdominal aortic aneurysm extending from just above the celiac axis, through the aortic bifurcation, with retroperitoneal and intraperitoneal hematoma. He was found at operation to have extension of his aneurysmal disease proximally, with complete separation of the proximal suture line, and rupture of the distal aortic wall. Since the aneurysm had been closed around the graft at the time of the original operation, his aneurysm had essentially been restored, and the diseased wall was again exposed to the tensile stresses from the pulsatile column of blood. Emergency repair was successful, despite postoperative complications including myocardial infarction, and later rupture of an iliac artery aneurysm. Patients presenting with signs and symptoms consistent with a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm after previous repair should be addressed aggressively with computed tomography if it is immediately available and the diagnosis is in doubt. The patient should then undergo an immediate operation. Such recurrence, although rare, must always be considered a possibility. Similar scenarios may be encountered secondary to endoleaks occurring after endoluminal aortic repairs.     

Abdominal aortic endograft proximal collapse resulting in aortic aneurysm rupture

An 82-year-old man was transferred to our emergency department due to acute abdominal pain. He had undergone an endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) six years ago. An intravenous contrast-enhanced abdominal computed tomography revealed the rupture of the abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) with a large retroperitoneal hematoma. A Talent (Medtronic, Santa Rosa, CA, USA) modular bifurcated endoprosthesis had vertically collapsed approximately 7 cm after losing its infrarenal fixation. As a result, it led to the repressurization of the aneurysm sac and rupture. The patient was successfully treated by placing three Talent (Medtronic) aortic cuffs. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of endograft collapse that has manifested with aortic aneurysm rupture. Although they are gradually declining, considerable rates of complications create the 'Achilles' heel' of endovascular repair of AAAs. A lifelong follow-up strategy for patients treated for AAA with EVAR is essential for the early detection and treatment of complications of the procedure.     

Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair

In treating uncomplicated abdominal aortic aenurysm, endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) has been employed as a good alternative to open repair with low perioperative morbidity and mortality. However, the aneurysm can enlarge or rupture even after EVAR as a result of device failure, endoleak, or graft migration. We experienced two cases of aneurismal rupture after EVAR, which were successfully treated by surgical extra-anatomic bypass.     

Long-term results of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm treatment with the first generation of commercially available stent grafts

HYPOTHESIS: Little information about the long-term results of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair is available. This study was performed to evaluate the long-term data of patients treated with the first generation of commercially available stent grafts. DESIGN: Multicenter registry. SETTING: Sixty-two European centers that participated in the EUROSTAR (EUROpean collaborators on Stent-graft Techniques for abdominal aortic Aneurysm Repair) registry. PATIENTS: A total of 1190 patients with a follow-up of up to 8 years, who underwent endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair with a stent graft (Stentor or Vanguard). INTERVENTION: Elective endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The morbidity and mortality data of patients treated with the first-generation stent graft who enrolled in the EUROSTAR registry were analyzed. Incidence rates of complications were calculated to quantify annual risks. Life-table analyses and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used for the survival analysis. RESULTS: Conversion to open repair, aneurysm rupture, all-cause death, and aneurysm-related death occurred in 7.1%, 2.4%, 19.9%, and 3.0% of the patients, respectively. The cumulative percentage of the combined outcome event, conversion-free and rupture-free survival, after 8 years was 48.0%. Procedure-related complications that frequently occurred were endoleak (13.0 cases per 100 patient-years), stenosis/thrombosis (4.6 cases per 100 patient-years), and stent migration (4.3 cases per 100 patient-years). CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with the first generation of stent grafts will need lifelong surveillance because of a considerable risk of late complications. How these findings translate to the outcome of newer-generation stent grafts is unknown. For this reason, vigilant surveillance remains indicated in all patients who undergo endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.     

Endovascular aortic grafting: current status

Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms was first reported in 1991. Since then there has been widespread development of many stent-grafts for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Available data support the proposition that stent-grafts are generally safe, although their long-term efficacy remains completely unknown. Importantly, endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair to date does not have fewer complications nor lower mortality rates than open repair; in fact, the opposite appears true. Along with most new techniques come new complications, and endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm has brought forth the concepts of both `endoleak' and device failure. While uncommon, delayed abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture following seemingly successful endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm has been reported. In our opinion, these faults, unique to endovascular repair, mandate a cautious approach to the clinical application of stent-grafts. Until ongoing Phase 2 and future Phase 3 studies are completed with a minimum of 2–3 years follow-up, we will not know if endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm represents a giant step forward or merely an industry-driven overuse of proprietary technology.     

Axillobifemoral bypass and aortic embolization for the treatment of two patients with ruptured infrarenal aortic aneurysms

We report two cases of hemodynamically stable patients with contained, ruptured, juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm that were both successfully treated by nonresectional therapy including axillobifemoral bypass with externally supported polytetrafluoroethylene graft, followed by coil embolization of the aneurysm sac and bilateral common iliac arteries. The patients were elderly with multiple comorbidities and complex aneurysm morphology not amenable to endovascular repair. In both cases complete thrombosis of the aneurysm was verified by computed tomography. Both patients are alive at follow-up without evidence of an increase in aneurysm size, postoperative leak, or rupture or impairment of renal function. To our knowledge these are the first reported cases in which this modality has been successfully used in patients presenting with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. Earlier results of nonresectional therapy for abdominal aortic aneurysm have reported a significant incidence of postoperative aneurysm rupture and renal failure. Growing experience at our institution with nonresectional therapy for high risk patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms suggests that nonresectional therapy can be a valuable treatment modality for high risk patients including those with contained rupture of the aneurysm who are hemodynamically stable.     

Late abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture after AneuRx repair: a report of three cases

Rupture due to device failure and/or endoleak is the most feared complication of endoluminal grafting for exclusion of abdominal aortic aneurysm. We present three previously unreported cases of abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture 23 months after AneuRx "repair" and describe the mechanisms of failure and discuss instructive technical aspects of their management.     

Staged endourologic and endovascular repair of an infrarenal inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysm presenting with forniceal rupture

We present the case of a 79-year-old female who presented with severe left flank pain and a pulsatile abdominal mass. She was diagnosed with left peripelvic urinary extravasation and forniceal rupture secondary to an intact infrarenal inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysm with extensive periaortic fibrosis. Successful operative repair was performed with staged ureteral and endovascular stenting with subsequent resolution of periaortic inflammation and ureteral obstruction, and shrinkage of the aneurysm sac. Inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysms (IAAAs) represent 5% to 10% of all abdominal aortic aneurysms. The distinguishing features of inflammatory aneurysms include thickening of aneurysm wall, retroperitoneal fibrosis, and adhesions to adjacent retroperitoneal structures. The most commonly involved adjacent structures are the duodenum, left renal vein, and ureter. Adhesions to the urinary system can cause hydronephrosis or hydroureter and result in obstructive uropathy. An unusual case of IAAA presenting with forniceal rupture is presented, with successful endovascular and endourologic repair.     

Spontaneous aortic dissection in the presence of coexistent or previously repaired atherosclerotic aortic aneurysm.

Acute aortic dissection occurred in 18 patients who had previously diagnosed atherosclerotic aneurysms of the thoracic and/or abdominal aorta. These patients were reviewed to assess the clinical course when these two forms of aortic pathology coexist. Patients were grouped according to status of their atherosclerotic aneurysm (previously repaired vs. untreated) and the segments of the aorta effected by the acute spontaneous dissection. Group 1 patients (n = 5) had previously undergone-abdominal aortic aneurysmectomy (AAA) repair, and the abdominal aortic suture line effectively terminated the dissection process. In Group 2 patients (n = 5), the acute dissection and the atherosclerotic aneurysm involved different segments of the aorta. Group 3 patients (n = 8) experienced spontaneous aortic dissection involving atherosclerotic aneurysms (five infrarenal, three thoracoabdominal), with threatened or actual rupture occurring in six patients, resulting in three deaths. In Group 3 patients, rupture occurred both at the atherosclerotic aneurysm (four patients) and at the site of the aortic intimal tear of the dissection (two patients) after AAA repair. The use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) has proven to be highly accurate in delineating the nature and extent of pathology in recently encountered patients with complicated aortic disease. Coexistence of atherosclerotic aneurysm and acute dissection appears to increase the risk of aortic rupture, in both proximal and distal aortic segments.     

Future of endograft surveillance

Frequent and sustained surveillance continues to be mandated for all patients who undergo endovascular repair of the aneurysmal aorta in order to minimize the small but attendant risk of aneurysm rupture. The primary motivation for surveillance includes evaluation of residual aneurysm sac size and presence of endoleak, as well as potential adverse device specific events, such as endograft migration, module disconnection, or component fatigue and failure. The current standard of care and future surveillance modalities after endovascular repair of both abdominal aortic and thoracic aortic aneurysms will be reviewed.     

Probability of rupture of an abdominal aortic aneurysm after an unrelated operative procedure: a prospective study

It has been assumed by some authors that patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms may be at increased risk of rupture after unrelated operations. From July 1986 to December 1989, 33 patients (29 men, 4 women) with a known abdominal aortic aneurysm underwent 45 operations. Twenty-eight patients had an infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm, and five patients had a thoracoabdominal aneurysm. The abdominal aortic aneurysm ranged in transverse diameter from 3.0 to 8.5 cm (average 5.6 cm). Twenty-seven patients underwent a single operation, and six patients had two or more (range of 1 to 6). Operations performed were abdominal (13); cardiothoracic (9); head/neck (2); other vascular (11); urologic (7); amputation (2); breast (1). General anesthesia was used in 29 procedures, spinal/epidural in 6, and regional/local in 10. One postoperative death occurred from cardiopulmonary failure. One patient died of a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm at 20 days after coronary artery bypass (1/33 patients [3%]; 1/45 operations [2%]). Fourteen patients had repair of their abdominal aortic aneurysm at a later date, an average of 18 weeks after operation. Four patients had abdominal aortic aneurysm considered too small to warrant resection (average 3.6 cm). Four patients were considered at excessive risk for elective repair. The five thoracoabdominal aneurysm were not repaired. Four patients are awaiting repair. During this same 40-month period, two other patients, not known to have an abdominal aortic aneurysm, died of a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm after another operative procedure, at 21 days and 77 days. All three ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms were 5.0 cm or greater in transverse diameter.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Erfolgreiche endovaskuläre Notfallversorgung eines rupturierten infrarenalen Aortenaneurysmas unter Reanimationsbedingungen

Open surgical repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAAs) still has a significant mortality rate. Endovascular aortic reconstruction (EVAR) appears to be a promising minimally invasive technique to improve prognosis in selected patients. We present a case of a 73-year-old patient who was successfully treated using endovascular emergency repair of a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. Immediate bleeding control in the hemodynamically unstable situation under cardiovascular resuscitation was achieved by deployment of an aortomonoiliac endoprosthesis. Temporary suprarenal aortic occlusion using a large size noncompliant balloon catheter was used. EVAR consisted of an aortouniiliac (AUI) device with iliac extension, contralateral iliac endo-occlusion (emergency AUI kit, Medtronic AVE, Santa Rosa, Calif., USA), and a femoro-femoral crossover bypass. The abdominal compartment syndrome consecutive to the aneurysm rupture was evacuated and a concomitant type II endoleakage resulting from a patent inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) was treated by secondary open surgical clipping. Clinical and radiological follow-up after 6 months showed the patient in excellent physical condition with an excluded abdominal aneurysm.     

Rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysm previously treated by endovascular stentgraft

We describe a case of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) with rupture 16 months after treatment by an endograft. A 76-year-old patient on Coumadin after aortic valve replacement had initially successful exclusion by stentgraft. There was no evidence of an endoleak seven months after stentgraft repair, although a computed tomography scan detected an enlargement of the aneurysm sac. Sixteen months after initial endograft surgery, rupture of the aneurysm occurred and we performed open emergency surgery. We treated the aneurysm by conventional technique, and the patient survived the rupture. This case emphasized the fact that patients after endograft AAA repair require a close follow-up. An expansion of the aneurysm sac after the procedure should signal failed exclusion, even if a computed tomography scan does not demonstrate an endoleak. Anticoagulation can be an important factor in failure after endoluminal graft treatment. Supravisceral aortic cross clamping is helpful in dealing with a stented aorta. (J Vasc Surg 1998;28:184-7.)     

The prevalence and natural history of aortic aneurysms in heart and abdominal organ transplant patients

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to document the prevalence and clinical features of aortic aneurysms in heart and abdominal transplant patients. METHODS: We undertook a retrospective review of 1557 patients who had heart, liver, or kidney transplantation between January 1, 1987, and December 31, 2000. Aortic aneurysms were identified by computed tomographic scan, ultrasound scan, or at the time of surgery for rupture. An aortic diameter of 3.5 cm was used as the threshold for the definition of aneurysmal disease. We compared dichotomous variables with Fisher's exact test and continuous variables with the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. RESULTS: There were 296 heart, 450 liver, and 811 kidney transplants performed on adult patients during the study period. We identified 18 transplant patients who had an aortic aneurysm (13 heart, three liver, two kidney). Seven patients (41%) had rupture of the aortic aneurysm, and five of these patients died. There were no deaths from causes other than aortic aneurysm rupture. The rate of aneurysm rupture was 22.5% per year. Eight patients had the aortic aneurysm repaired electively with no deaths and no hospital stay greater than 15 days. The mean aortic aneurysm size at rupture was 6.02 +/- 0.86 cm, and the smallest aneurysm that ruptured was 5.1 cm. The pretransplant rate of aortic aneurysm expansion was 0.46 cm/y, but this increased to 1.00 cm/y after transplantation (P =.08). The rate of aortic aneurysm expansion among heart transplant patients and abdominal transplant patients was the same (P =.51). The prevalence of aortic aneurysm was 4.1% in cardiac transplant patients and 0.4% in abdominal transplant patients. Earlier in our series (1987 to 1996), 11% of the cardiac transplant patients were screened for aortic aneurysms, and the prevalence rate of diagnosis was 3.0%. Screening of cardiac transplant candidates became more frequent in 1997 (87% screened), with an associated increase in the aortic aneurysm prevalence rate to 5.8% in the patients who were screened. CONCLUSION: Aortic aneurysms in cardiac and abdominal transplant patients have an aggressive natural history with high expansion and rupture rates. Screening transplant patients for aortic aneurysms will increase detection and facilitate elective repair, which is generally well tolerated. These findings support programs for early detection and elective treatment of aortic aneurysms in organ transplant patients, particularly those having heart transplants.     

Spontaneous bladder rupture owing to atherosclerotic emboli: a case report

We report a case of spontaneous intraperitoneal rupture of the bladder in an elderly man with severe atherosclerotic vascular disease who had widespread systemic evidence of an arterial embolic phenomenon after elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Atherosclerotic plaques were identified in the vesical arteries and were believed to be the primary event responsible for spontaneous vesical perforation. The clinical presentation, diagnosis and principles of management of vesical rupture are discussed.     

Watchful waiting in cases of small abdominal aortic aneurysms- appropriate for all patients?

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of patient compliance on a program of watchful waiting in cases of small abdominal aortic aneurysms and to document the proportion of patients who become prohibitive operative risks during follow-up. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective review was conducted at a regional military veterans medical center. The subjects were 101 male military veterans with abdominal aortic aneurysms measuring less than 5 cm who did not have medical contraindications to operative repair. The main outcome measures were (1) the proportion of patients who missed three scheduled radiologic tests in a row despite written notifications mailed to their homes and (2) the proportion of compliant patients who had medical illnesses and became prohibitive operative risks during follow-up. RESULTS: During a follow-up (mean +/- SEM) of 34 +/- 2 months, 69 patients (69%) were fully compliant with the watchful waiting program and underwent a mean of 4.5 +/- 0.3 radiologic tests. There were no abdominal aortic aneurysm ruptures in this subgroup. Twenty-five patients (36%) had indications for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, and 28 (41%) have not met the criteria for repair. Sixteen (23%) of the 69 compliant patients developed prohibitive medical risks during follow-up; eight (50%) of these 16 patients died, all of the causes unrelated to their abdominal aortic aneurysms. Thirty-two (32%) of the 101 study subjects were noncompliant with the watchful waiting program. Twenty-seven (84%) of the noncompliant patients did not keep any scheduled appointments, and five (16%) were lost after one or two examinations. Three of the noncompliant patients experienced documented abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture, and it is suspected in a fourth. Direct contact was made with 28 (88%) of these patients or their families; all acknowledged having received written notifications regarding their watchful waiting program tests and had decided not to continue with surveillance for a variety of socioeconomic reasons. Between the 69 compliant patients and the 32 noncompliant patients, there were no differences with respect to mean age (70 +/- 1 years vs 73 +/- 2 years), distance from home of record to the hospital (62 +/- 14 miles vs 73 +/- 23 miles), or abdominal aortic aneurysm size at initial detection (3.75 +/- 0.5 cm vs 3.8 +/- 0.5 cm). CONCLUSIONS: Watchful waiting programs are imperfect and highly reliant on the motivation levels and means of the individual patients. Watchful waiting is reasonable among compliant patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms, inasmuch as fewer than half will meet the criteria for intervention within a mean of 3 years. Approximately one fourth of these patients will have medical contraindications to abdominal aortic aneurysm repair during follow-up, and many of these will die of causes other than abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture. In our experience, one third of candidates for watchful waiting programs are unable to participate and are at risk of rupture. These patients need special attention so that the reasons for their noncompliance can be determined, and they may be candidates for earlier intervention.