Improved outcome with femur fractures: early vs. delayed fixation

Prior studies documented that early fixation of femur fractures results in a decreased incidence of adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), fat embolism syndrome, and pneumonia. This study evaluates the impact of magnitude of injury on pulmonary complications and length of ICU and hospital stays in 339 trauma patients with femur fracture undergoing early (n = 121) vs. late (n = 218) operative fixation. Groups were similar with respect to transfusions, hypotension, and associated injuries, but more patients over age 50 years underwent early fixation. Patients were categorized according to Injury Severity Score (ISS): 1) less than 15 (n = 202), 2) 16-35 (n = 104), and 3) greater than 36 (n = 33). Delayed fixation significantly increased the incidence of pulmonary shunt in ISS (3) patients and of pneumonia in patients older than 50. Late fixation resulted in significantly longer hospital stays in all groups and more ICU days in the ISS (3) group. We believe that early femur fixation should be performed on all patients. Pulmonary complications were decreased and health care costs reduced.     

Multiple trauma and scapula fractures: so what?

BACKGROUND Scapula fractures are rare and are presumed to indicate severe underlying trauma. We studied injury patterns and overall outcome in patients with multiple injuries with scapula fractures. METHODS: We carried out a retrospective review of patients with multiple injuries (Injury Severity Score [ISS] > or = 16) with chest and musculoskeletal injuries admitted to our institution between 1993 and 1999 to investigate whether the presence of a scapula fracture is a marker of increased morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: There were 1,164 patients admitted with multiple trauma. Seventy-nine (6.8%) of the 1,164 sustained a scapula fracture, forming the study group. The remainder of the patients (n = 1,085) formed the control group of the study. Both groups of patients were similar with regard to age and Glasgow Coma Scale score (age, 42 +/- 17.8 [+/- SD] vs. 40 +/- 22; GCS score, 11.2 +/- 5.1 vs. 11 +/- 5 in the study and control groups, respectively). The overall ISS was significantly higher in those with scapula fractures (27.12 +/- 15.13 vs. 22.8 +/- 14.4, p = 0.01). Patients with scapula fractures also had more severe chest injuries (Abbreviated Injury Scale score of 3.46 +/- 1.1 vs. 3.1 +/- 1.0, respectively), but not significantly so. However, the incidence of rib fractures was significantly higher in the patients with scapula fractures (p < 0.05). The incidence and severity of head and abdominal injuries were similar in the two groups. The severity of extremity injuries in patients with scapula fractures was significantly lower (2.4 +/- 0.6 vs. 2.7 +/- 0.7, p = 0.001). The rate of admission, the length of intensive care unit stay, and the overall length of hospital stay were similar in the two groups. The overall mortality rate was 11.4% in patients with scapula fractures and 20% in those without scapula fractures (p = 0.1). CONCLUSION: Patients with scapula fractures have more severe underlying chest injuries and overall ISS. However, this did not correlate with a higher rate of intensive therapy unit admission, length of hospital stay, or mortality.     

Trauma in the elderly: intensive care unit resource use and outcome

BACKGROUND: As the population ages, the elderly will constitute a prominent proportion of trauma patients. The elderly suffer more severe consequences from traumatic injuries compared with the young, presumably resulting in increased resource use. In this study, we sought to examine ICU resource use in trauma on the basis of age and injury severity. METHODS: This study was a retrospective review of trauma registry data prospectively collected on 26,237 blunt trauma patients admitted to all trauma centers (n = 26) in one state over 24 months (January 1996-December 1997). Age-dependent and injury severity-dependent differences in mortality, ICU length of stay (LOS), and hospital LOS were evaluated by logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Elderly (age > or = 65 years, n = 7,117) patients had significantly higher mortality rates than younger (age < 65 years) trauma patients after stratification by Injury Severity Score (ISS), Revised Trauma Score, and other preexisting comorbidities. Age > 65 years was associated with a two- to threefold increased mortality risk in mild (ISS < 15, 3.2% vs. 0.4%; < 0.001), moderate (ISS 15-29, 19.7% vs. 5.4%; < 0.001), and severe traumatic injury (ISS > or = 30, 47.8% vs. 21.7%; < 0.001) compared with patients aged < 65 years. Logistic regression analysis confirmed that elderly patients had a nearly twofold increased mortality risk (odds ratio, 1.87; confidence interval, 1.60-2.18; < 0.001). Elderly patients also had significantly longer hospital LOS after stratifying for severity of injury by ISS (1.9 fewer days in the age 18-45 group, 0.89 fewer days in the age 46-64 group compared with the age > or = 65 group). Mortality rates were higher for men than for women only in the ISS < 15 (4.4% vs. 2.6%, < 0.001) and ISS 15 to 29 (21.7% vs. 17.6%, = 0.031) groups. ICU LOS was significantly decreased in elderly patients with ISS > or = 30. CONCLUSION: Age is confirmed as an independent predictor of outcome (mortality) in trauma after stratification for injury severity in this largest study of elderly trauma patients to date. Elderly patients with severe injury (ISS > 30) have decreased ICU resource use secondary to associated increased mortality rates.     

The Injury Severity Score or the New Injury Severity Score for predicting intensive care unit admission and hospital length of stay?

OBJECTIVES: To compare the New Injury Severity Score (NISS) and the Injury Severity Score (ISS) as predictors of intensive care unit (ICU) admission and hospital length of stay (LOS) in an urban North American trauma population and in a subset of patients with head injuries. METHODS: The study population consisted of 23,909 patients from three urban level I trauma centres in the province of Quebec, Canada. The predictive accuracies of the NISS and the ISS were compared using Receiver Operator Characteristic (ROC) curves and Hosmer-Lemeshow (H-L) statistics for the logistic regression model of ICU admission and using r2 for the linear regression model of LOS. RESULTS: A total of 7660 (32%) patients were admitted to the ICU. Mean LOS was 8.2+/-2.5 days. In the whole sample, the NISS presented equivalent discrimination (area under ROC curve: NISS = 0.839 versus ISS = 0.843, p = 0.08) but better calibration (H-L statistic: 309 versus 611) for predicting ICU admission. In the subgroup patients with moderate to serious head injuries, the NISS was a better predictor of ICU admission in terms of both discrimination (area under ROC curve: NISS = 0.771 versus ISS = 0.747, p < 0.00001) and calibration (H-L statistic: 12 versus 21). The NISS explained more variation in LOS than the ISS for the whole sample (r2 = 0.254 versus 0.249, p = 0.0008) and in the sub-population with moderate to severe head injuries (r2 = 0.281 versus 0.263, p = 0.0002). CONCLUSIONS: The NISS is a better choice for case mix control in trauma research than the ISS for predicting ICU admission and LOS, particularly among patients with moderate to severe head injuries.     

Trauma in nonagenarians and centenarians: review of 137 consecutive patients

The purpose of this study was to examine the hospital course and outcomes of elderly trauma patients. We accomplished a retrospective review of all consecutive trauma patients admitted to a level II trauma center from January 2000 to April 2002. Gender, Injury Severity Score (ISS), length of stay (LOS), operative procedure, morbidity, and mortality of patients > or = 90 years of age were compared with younger patients. Of 2645 trauma admissions, 137 patients (5%) were > or = 90 years (range, 90 to 108 years; mean, 93.1 years); 5 patients were > or = 100 years. One hundred eleven (81%) patients were female; 26 (19%) male. Average ISS for patients > or = 90 was 8.75 and was 7.78 for younger patients. One hundred sixteen elderly patients (85%) had ISS < 15. Falls were the most common mechanism of injury (93%), usually ground-level falls (64%). Two hundred ninety-two injuries included 133 fractures and 102 soft tissue injuries. Thirty-four elderly patients (25%) and 733 younger patients (29%) required surgery. Complications developed in 8 per cent of older and 6 per cent of younger patients. Hospital LOS averaged 4.36 days for older and 3.51 days for younger patients. Six older (4.4%) and 63 younger (2.5%) patients died. ISS scores and LOS were slightly higher in elderly patients, but morbidity and mortality were comparable in both groups.     

Trauma-specific intensive care units can be cost effective and contribute to reduced hospital length of stay.

Our hypothesis was that clinical outcomes are improved and cost and hospital length of stay (LOS) reduced as a result of the opening of a closed trauma intensive care unit (ICU). We conducted a cross-sectional study in a university-affiliated Level I trauma center. Our study population comprised trauma patients admitted to the ICU between June 1, 1996 and July 1, 1998 for at least 24 hours and with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) >16 (excluding those with severe brain injury). The main outcome measures were changes in LOS and number of ventilator days, prevalence of complications, changes in patient charges, and hospital costs. Two hundred four patients were included [trauma ICU (TICU) 60, surgical ICU 144]. The two groups were not statistically different in age, ISS, mechanism of injury, infection rate, and mortality; however, the TICU patients had a lower number of ventilator hours (83.1 vs 100.0; P = 0.007), lower ICU LOS (9.4 vs 12.1 days; P = 0.06), and lower total hospital LOS (15.6 vs 22.3 days; P = 0.01). Although this was not of statistical significance TICU patients had lower hospital charges ($125,383 vs $152,994; P = 0.06) and lower cost per case ($42,306 vs $47,548; P = 0.35) for a net savings of $314,520 during the first 6 months of operation of the TICU. This study suggests that improved clinical outcomes and decreases in cost and LOS are directly related to the opening of a closed trauma ICU.     

Gender-related outcomes in trauma

BACKGROUND: Recent data suggest that sex hormones may play a role in regulating posttraumatic immunosuppression, leading to gender-based differences in outcome after injuries. This study examined gender-related outcomes in trauma patients. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of trauma registry data from our Level I trauma center over a 4-year period. Patients > 15 years of age, with Injury Severity Scores > 15, who survived and received mechanical ventilation for > 48 hours were included. Patients were divided into two groups on the basis of age (15-45 years and > 45 years) and the groups were further stratified by gender. Groups were matched by Injury Severity Scores, Glasgow Coma Scale score, Abbreviated Injury Score for the head, and transfusion requirement. Gender-based outcomes consisted of ventilator days, intensive care unit length of stay (LOS), hospital LOS, pneumonia, and death. RESULTS: Data were reported as mean +/- SD. There were 612 patients. In the younger age group, male patients had a higher incidence of multiple organ failure (10.5% vs. 1.5%), longer intensive care unit (13.5 +/- 9.2 days vs. 9.2 +/- 7.2 days) and hospital LOS (30.2 +/- 37.7 days vs. 18.9 +/- 13.0 days), and higher mortality (13.4% vs. 6.8%) compared with female patients (p < 0.05 for all). These differences did not exist in the older age group. The incidence of pneumonia did not differ by gender. Age > 45 years was associated with higher mortality (odds ratio, 2.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-3.5). CONCLUSION: Although the incidence of pneumonia was not influenced by gender, female trauma patients had better outcomes than male patients in the younger age group. Outcome in the older age group was not gender-related. Our data support a gender-based difference in outcome after traumatic injuries in younger patients.     

Young versus old: factors affecting mortality after blunt traumatic injury

Advanced age predicts poor outcome after trauma. We have previously demonstrated that prolonged occult hypoperfusion (POH), defined as serum lactic acid >2.4 mmol/L persisting for >12 hours, is also associated with worse outcomes. We hypothesized that older patients--a group with potentially less physiologic reserve--would be at greater risk from POH. Prospective data from adult blunt trauma patients admitted to a surgical/trauma intensive care unit from January 1, 1998 through December 31, 1999 were analyzed. Mortality, POH, Injury Severity Score (ISS), chronic health designation (CH) from the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation, emergency department Glasgow Coma Scale score (EDGCS), emergency department systolic blood pressure (EDSBP), and gender were compared between older (>55 years) and younger (<56 years) patients and then between nonsurvivors and survivors within age cohorts. Two hundred sixty-four patients were analyzed: 195 younger and 69 older. Mortality was 8.3 per cent (22/264). Older patients had higher mortality (20.3% vs 4.1%, P < 0.05), higher CH (42.9% +/- 1.3 vs 8.4% +/- 0.6), lower ISS (22.6 +/- 1.5 vs 25.6 +/- 0.8, P < 0.05), higher EDGCS (12.9 +/- 0.5 vs 10.7 +/- 0.4, P < 0.05), and higher EDSBP (141.5 +/- 4.1 vs 129.3 +/- 2.2). There were no differences in incidence of POH and gender. Within both age cohorts nonsurvivors had higher ISS, lower EDGCS, and higher CH. Older patients with POH had 34.6 per cent mortality as compared with 11.6 per cent for no POH (P < 0.05). Mortality in younger patients was no different in the presence of POH, and all non-survivors were male. Despite lower ISS and higher EDGCS and EDSBP older patients had five times the mortality of younger patients. Age-specific mortality was influenced by POH and gender. POH was associated with higher mortality only in older patients. With less physiologic reserve older patients may not have been able to adequately compensate for POH; this emphasizes the importance of rapidly correcting serum lactic acid as an endpoint in resuscitation in this population.     

"Shift work" improves survival and reduces intensive care unit use in seriously injured patients

We assessed whether a trauma service model with an emphasis on continuity of care by using "shift work" will improve trauma outcomes and cost. This was a case-control cohort study that took place at a university-affiliated Level I trauma center. All patients (n=4283) evaluated for traumatic injuries between May 1, 2002 and April 30, 2004 were included. During Period I (May 1, 2002 to April 30, 2003), a rotating off-service team provided initial management between 5:00 PM and 7:00 AM. The "day team" provided all other care and was responsible for continuity of care. In Period II (May 1, 2003 to April 30, 2004), a dedicated trauma service consisting of two resident teams evaluated all injured patients. Variables included hospital and intensive care unit length of stay (LOS), mechanical ventilation requirements, hospital mortality, and hospital care costs. Demographics and injury mechanism for both periods were similar, but Injury Severity Score (ISS) in Period II was greater (ISS, 8.2% vs. 7.2%, P < 0.0001; ISS > 15, 18.5% vs. 15.4%). In the more severely injured (ISS > 15), patients in Period II had shorter hospital LOS (8.6 vs. 9.7 days, P = 0.98), a shorter ICU LOS (5.5 vs. 7.7 days, P = 0.039), shorter mechanical ventilator requirements (5.5 vs. 7.7 days, P = 0.32), improved hospital mortality rate (19.9% vs. 26.8%, P = 0.029), and decreased hospital costs (19,146 dollars vs. 21,274 dollars, P = 0.36). On multivariate analysis, factors affecting mortality and LOS included age, initial vital signs, injury type, and ISS. Overall, the two trauma service models resulted in similar outcomes. Although multivariate analysis revealed that treatment period did not affect mortality, our study revealed improved patient survival and reduction in LOS and cost for the severely injured in Period II.     

Impact of nosocomial infections in trauma: does age make a difference?

BACKGROUND: The effect of age and infection on outcome after trauma is unknown. We evaluated the incidence and impact that nosocomial infection (NI) and age have on morbidity and mortality. Several risk factors were identified and analyzed for correlation with infection. METHODS: Prospective data were collected on patients admitted for > or = 3 days over a 2-year period. Each patient was followed by an infectious disease specialist throughout their hospitalization. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines were used to diagnose infection. RESULTS: Of the 3,254 patients admitted, 88% were < 65 and 12% were > or = 65 years of age. Injury Severity Score was not significantly different (older vs. younger). Five hundred one (17.4%) of the younger patients developed an NI with a significantly higher hospital length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit (ICU) LOS, and mortality compared with the noninfected group. One hundred forty-seven (39%) of the older group developed an NI and also had significant increases in hospital LOS, ICU LOS, and mortality. Older infected patients had the highest hospital LOS, ICU LOS, and mortality. The greatest relative risk of mortality was demonstrated with the combination of increased age and NI. Once infected, however, younger patients with penetrating trauma had a greater relative risk of mortality in the group-specific comparison. Many risk factors were associated with infection. Only chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in elderly trauma patients was a significant independent risk factor for infection. CONCLUSION: NI significantly increases hospital LOS, ICU LOS, and mortality after injury. Age increases risk of infection matched for injury severity, with a significantly higher hospital LOS, ICU LOS, and mortality. Once infected, however, younger patients with penetrating trauma have the greatest risk of mortality. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in elderly trauma patients was found to be an independent predictor of infection.     

An appraisal of trauma in the elderly

To review the trends of trauma in the elderly experienced at our trauma center compared with other Level I trauma centers. This was a retrospective trauma registry analysis (1996-2003) of 2783 blunt trauma in elderly (BTE) and 4568 adult (BTA) patients in a Level 1 trauma center. Falls and motor vehicular crashes were the most common mechanisms noted in 47 per cent and 31 per cent (84% and 13% in BTE, 25% and 42% in BTA). BTE were sicker, with higher Injury Severity Scores (ISS), lengths of stay, and mortality (5% vs 2%, P value < 0.05). ISS was 5.2-fold higher in nonsurvivors to survivors in BTA and 2.4-fold in BTE. Elevation in ISS resulted in higher linear increase in mortality in BTE (vs BTA) at any ISS level. Mortality in patients with ISS > or = 25 was 43.5 per cent vs 23.8 per cent. ISS > or = 50 had 31 per cent adult survivors but no elderly survivors. Among isolated injuries, head trauma in the elderly carried the highest mortality, at 12 per cent (19% in patients with an Abbreviated Injury Score > or = 3). Abdominal injuries were the most lethal (18.3% and 41.2% in patients with an Abbreviated Injury Score > or = 3) in multiple trauma victims (41% vs 18% in isolated trauma). There was 4.4-fold increased mortality in the presence of thoracic trauma. Combined head, chest, and abdominal trauma carried the worst prognosis. Thirty-four per cent of BTE and 88 per cent of BTA patients were discharged home. Elderly patients need more aggressive therapy, as they are sicker with higher mortality.     

Acute respiratory distress syndrome in the trauma intensive care unit: Morbid but not mortal

HYPOTHESIS: The diagnosis of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) carries significant additional morbidity and mortality among critically injured patients. DESIGN: Retrospective case-control study using a prospectively maintained ARDS database. SETTING: Surgical intensive care unit (ICU) in an academic county hospital. PATIENTS: All trauma patients admitted to the ICU from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2003, who developed ARDS as defined by (1) acute onset, (2) a partial pressure of arterial oxygen-fraction of inspired oxygen ratio of 200 or less, (3) bilateral pulmonary infiltrates on chest radiographs, and (4) absence of left-sided heart failure. Each patient with ARDS was matched with 2 control patients without ARDS on the basis of sex, age (+/-5 years), mechanism of injury (blunt or penetrating), Injury Severity Score (+/-3), and chest Abbreviated Injury Score (+/-1). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mortality, hospital charges, hospital and ICU lengths of stay, and complications (defined as pneumonia, deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, acute renal failure, and disseminated intravascular coagulopathy). RESULTS: Of 2042 trauma ICU admissions, 216 patients (10.6%) met criteria for ARDS. We identified 432 similarly injured control patients. Compared with controls, trauma patients with ARDS had more complications (43.1% vs 9.5%), longer hospital (32.2 vs 17.9 days) and ICU (22.1 vs 8.4 days) lengths of stay, and higher hospital charges (267,037 dollars vs 136,680 dollars) (P < .01 for all), but mortality was similar (27.8% vs 25.0%, P = .48). CONCLUSION: Although ARDS is associated with increased morbidity, hospital and ICU length of stay, and costs, it does not increase overall mortality among critically ill trauma patients.     

Admission serum albumin is predicitve of outcome in critically ill trauma patients

There is a paucity of data evaluating serum albumin on admission as a predictor of outcome in adult trauma patients. Our objectives were to evaluate whether or not hypoalbuminemia on admission is a predictor of adverse outcome in trauma patients. Prospective data was collected daily on 1023 patients over a 2-year period. Patients were stratified by serum albumin level on admission, age, gender, injury severity, and comorbid conditions. Outcome was measured by ICU and hospital length of stay, ventilator days, incidence of infection, and mortality. Student t test, chi2, and multilinear regression analysis were used to determine level of significance. Blunt injuries accounted for the majority (78%) of the admissions. The mean age of the study population was 43+/-21 years with a mean Injury Severity Score (ISS) of 21.4+/-12. The majority of patients were male (74.5%). The mean albumin level on admission was 2.9+/-1.8. Five hundred ninety-three (58%) patients were admitted with a serum albumin level of > or =2.6 as compared to 430 patients (42%) with an admission albumin level of <2.6. Patients with a lower serum albumin level were found to have a significantly greater ICU (17.1 vs 14.2 days) and hospital length of stay (17.3 vs 20.1 days, P'< 0.05), ventilator days (11.1 vs 13.5 days, P < 0.05), and mortality (P = 0.008) when matched for age and injury severity. The relative risk of infection and mortality increased greater than 2.5-fold in patients with increased age and low serum albumin when analyzed by multilinear regression analysis, P < 0.001. An admission serum albumin level of <2.6 g/dL is a significant independent predictor of morbidity and mortality in trauma patients. The combination of increased age and low albumin level was most predictive of infection and mortality. Early nutrition should be considered in these high-risk patients.     

Pulmonary tractotomy versus lung resection: viable options in penetrating lung injury.

BACKGROUND: Emergency lung resection following penetrating chest trauma has been associated with mortality rates as high as 55-100%. Pulmonary tractotomy is advocated as a rapid alternative method of dealing with deep lobar injuries. We reviewed our experience with resection and tractotomy to determine whether method of management affects mortality or if patient presentation is more critical in determining outcome. METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients with chest injury seen at an urban Level I trauma center from 2/89-1/99 was performed. All patients undergoing parenchymal surgery were included. Records were abstracted for grade of injury, type of resection, presenting systolic blood pressure (SBP), temperature, Injury Severity Score (ISS), operative time, and estimated blood loss (EBL). Mortality and thoracic complications were compared between groups. RESULTS: Two hundred forty-six of 2736 patients with penetrating chest trauma underwent thoracotomy, with 70 (28%) requiring some form of lung resection. There were 11 (15.7%) deaths. Patients who died had lower SBP (53 +/- 32 mm Hg vs 77 +/- 28 mm Hg), lower temperature (32.5 degrees +/- 1.3 degrees C vs 34.3 degrees +/- 1.2 degrees C), higher ISS (33 +/- 13 vs 23 +/- 9), and greater EBL (9.8 +/- 4.3 liters vs 2.8 +/- 2.1 liters) compared with survivors (p < 0.05 for all). Mortality was also increased in the presence of cardiac injury (33% with vs 12% without) and the need for laparotomy (26% with vs 9% without) (p < 0.05 for all). Tractotomy was associated with an increased incidence of chest complications (67% vs 24%, p = 0.05) compared with lobectomy with no difference in presenting physiology, operative time, or mortality. CONCLUSION: Lung resection for penetrating injuries can be done safely with morbidity and mortality rates lower than previously reported. Patient outcome is related to severity of injury rather than type of resection. Tractotomy is associated with a higher incidence of infectious complications and is not associated with shortened operative times or survival.     

The New Injury Severity Score: a more accurate predictor of in-hospital mortality than the Injury Severity Score

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether the New Injury Severity Score (NISS) is a better predictor of mortality than the Injury Severity Score (ISS) in general and in subgroups according to age, penetrating trauma, and body region injured. METHODS: The study population consisted of 24,263 patients from three urban Level I trauma centers in the province of Quebec, Canada. Discrimination and calibration of NISS and ISS models were compared using receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves and Hosmer-Lemeshow statistics. RESULTS: NISS showed better discrimination than ISS (area under the ROC curve = 0.827 vs. 0.819; p = 0.0006) and improved calibration (Hosmer-Leme-show = 62 vs. 112). The advantage of the NISS over the ISS was particularly evident among patients with head/neck injuries (area under the ROC curve = 0.819 vs. 0.784; p < 0.0001; Hosmer-Lemeshow = 59 vs. 350). CONCLUSION: The NISS is a more accurate predictor of in-hospital death than the ISS and should be chosen over the ISS for case-mix control in trauma research, especially in certain subpopulations such as head/neck-injured patients.     

Poor glycemic control is associated with increased mortality in critically ill trauma patients

Glycemic control improves outcome in cardiac surgical patients and after myocardial infarction or stroke. Hyperglycemic predicts poor outcome in trauma, but currently no data exist on the effect of glycemic control in critically ill trauma patients. In our intensive care unit (ICU), we use a subcutaneous sliding scale insulin protocol to achieve glucose levels <140 mg/dL. We hypothesized that aggressive glycemic control would be associated with improved outcome in critically ill trauma patients. At our urban Level 1 trauma center, a retrospective study was conducted of all injured patients admitted to the surgical ICU >48 hours during a 6-month period. Data were collected for mechanism of injury, age, diabetic history, Injury Severity Score (ISS), and APACHE II score. All blood glucose levels, by laboratory serum measurement or by point-of-care finger stick, were collected for the entire ICU stay. Outcome data (mortality, ICU and hospital length of stay, ventilator days, and complications) were collected and analyzed. Patients were stratified by their preinjury diabetic history and their level of glucose control (controlled <140 mg/dL vs non-controlled > or =141 mg/dL) and these groups were compared. During the study period, 103 trauma patients were admitted to the surgical ICU >48 hours. Ninety (87.4%) were nondiabetic. Most (83.5%) sustained blunt trauma. The average age was 50 +/- 21 years, the average ISS was 22 +/- 12, and the average APACHE II was 16 +/- 9. The average glucose for the population was 128 +/-25 mg/dL. Glycemic control was not attained in 27 (26.2%) patients; 19 (70.4%) of these were nondiabetic. There were no differences in ISS or APACHE II for controlled versus non-controlled patients. However, non-controlled patients were older. Mortality was 9.09 per cent for the controlled group and was 22.22 per cent for the non-controlled group. Diabetic patients were older and less severely injured than nondiabetics. For nondiabetic patients, mortality was 9.86 per cent in controlled patients and 31.58 per cent in non-controlled patients (P < 0.05). Also, urinary tract infections were more prevalent and complication rates overall were higher in nondiabetic patients with noncontrolled glucose levels. Nonsurvivors had higher average glucose than survivors (P < 0.03). Poor glycemic control is associated with increased morbidity and mortality in critically ill trauma patients; this is more pronounced in nondiabetic patients. Age may be a factor in these findings. Subcutaneous sliding scale insulin alone may be inadequate to maintain glycemic control in older critically ill injured patients and in patients with greater physiologic insult. Prospective assessment is needed to further clarify the benefits of aggressive glycemic control, to assess the optimal mode of insulin delivery, and to better define therapeutic goals in critically ill, injured patients.     

Study of the outcome of patients transferred to a level I hospital after stabilization at an outlying hospital in a rural setting

OBJECTIVE: To determine the characteristics and outcome of transferred trauma patients in a rural setting. METHODS: We conducted a case-control study of all trauma admissions to a rural Level I trauma center to examine a 3.5-year (1993-1996) comparison of trauma patients admitted directly with those transferred (RTTP) after being initially stabilized at an outlying hospital. We used prehospital times, Injury Severity Score (ISS), LD50ISS (the ISS at which 50% of patients died), Revised Trauma Score, probability of survival, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II, and observed survival as main outcome measures. RESULTS: RTTPs (39.4%) spent an average of 182+/-139 minutes at the outlying hospital and 72+/-42 minutes in transport to the trauma center. Proportionately more head/neck and patients with multiple injuries composed the RTTP group. The RTTP were more severely injured (ISS 11.1+/-8.5; Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II 16.2+/-5.8; Revised Trauma Score 7.44+/-1.1) than the trauma patients admitted directly (ISS 7.9+/-5.3; Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II 13.1+/-6.3; Revised Trauma Score 7.8+/-0.4; p < 0.05). However, both groups had the same LD50ISS (ISS = 35). When logistic regression was applied with death as the dependent variable, both ISS and age contributed significantly (p = 0.0001) but transfer status did not (p = 0.473). CONCLUSION: Rural trauma centers admit a high percentage of RTTP. These RTTP have a higher injury severity and acuity than their trauma patients admitted directly counterparts. Trauma care in rural areas that involves initial stabilization at outlying hospitals does not adversely affect mortality.     

Blood transfusion is associated with infection and increased resource utilization in combat casualties

Combat casualty care has made significant advances in recent years, including administration of blood products in far-forward locations. However, recent studies have shown blood transfusion to be a significant risk factor for infection and increased resource utilization in critically injured patients. We therefore sought to investigate the incidence of blood transfusion and its association with infection and resource utilization in combat casualties. Prospective data were collected and retrospectively reviewed on 210 critically injured patients admitted to the USNS Comfort over a 7-week period during the 2003 assault phase of Operation Iraqi Freedom. Patients were stratified by age, gender, and injury severity score (ISS). Multivariate regression analyses were used to assess blood transfusion and hematocrit (HCT) as independent risk factors for infection and intensive care unit (ICU) admission controlling for age, gender, and ISS. The study cohort had a mean age of 30 +/- 2 years, a mean ISS of 14 +/- 3, 84 per cent were male, and 88 per cent sustained penetrating trauma. Blood transfusion was required in 44 per cent (n = 93) of the study cohort. Transfused patients had a higher ISS (18 +/- 4 vs. 10 +/- 3, P < 0.01), a higher pulse rate (105 +/- 4 vs. 93 +/- 3, P < 0.0001), and a lower admission HCT (27 +/- 1 vs. 33 +/- 2, P < 0.0001) compared with patients not transfused. Patients receiving blood transfusion had an increased infection rate (69% vs. 18%, P < 0.0001), ICU admission rate (52% vs. 21%, P < 0.0001), and ICU length of stay (6.7 +/- 2.1 days vs. 1.4 +/- 0.5 days, P < 0.0001) compared with nontransfused patients. However, there was no significant difference in mortality between transfused and nontransfused patients. Multivariate binomial regression analysis identified blood transfusion and HCT as independent risk factors for infection (P < 0.01) and blood transfusion as an independent risk factor for ICU admission (P < 0.05). Combat casualties have a high incidence of blood transfusion. Blood transfusion is an independent risk factor for infection and increased resource utilization. Therefore, consideration should be given to the use of alternative blood substitutes and recombinant human erythropoietin in the treatment and management of combat casualties.