Combination of Antitachycardia Pacemaker and Automatic Implantable Cardioverter/Defibrillator for Ventricular Tachycardia

Antitachycardia pacing for ventricular tachycardia (VT) is associated with the possibility of fibrillating the heart; on the other hand, the frequency of VT and patient discomfort can limit treatment with the automatic implantable cardioverter/defibrillator (AICD). To contribute to the further development of a universal pacemaker, we evaluated the combined use of the antitachycardia pacemaker ("tachylog") and the AICD in five patients with recurrent VT. In the automatic mode, the "tachylog" worked as a bipolar VVI pacemaker. For antitachycardia pacing, a burst of rapid ventricular pacing was delivered at about 80% of the cycle length. During a follow-up period of 5 +/- 2 months (range, 3 to 8) two to 291 successful interventions of antitachycardia pacing were counted from diagnostic data which had been collected by the pulse generator during the course of treatment. When the antitachycardia pacemaker failed to terminate VT, the AICD was activated. In the individual case, between 0 and 41 discharges of the AICD were delivered. The high pulse energy of the AICD did not damage the antitachycardia pacemaker; no interference of the two devices was observed. Future antitachycardia systems should be more flexible with regard to detection and termination modes, combining antitachycardia pacing with back-up defibrillation.     

Automatic Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator/Permanent Pacemaker Interaction: Loss of Pacemaker Capture Following AICD Discharge

A 78-year-old man treated with amiodarone for recurrent ventricular tachycardia, had sequential placement of a bipolar VVI pacemaker and an automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator (AICD). During defibrillation threshold testing, there was failure to capture of the pacer in the post-shock period. The time of failure to capture appeared energy-related: the greater the energy delivered, the longer the failure to capture. Careful attention will be necessary in constructing combined AICD/pacemaker units.     

Long-Term Efficacy of an Antitachycardia Pacemaker and Implantable Defibrillator Combination

Antitachycardia pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) were implanted in 14 patients to control recurrent hemodynamically stable ventricular tachycardia (VT), All patients underwent extensive preimplant testing in the elecrrophysiology laboratory documenting that in each patient at least 50 episodes of VT could be reliably terminated by an external model of the antitachycardia pacemaker. The burst scanning mode of anfitachycardia pacing was used in all patients. ICDs were implanted solely as a back up should acceleration of VT occur, and all had high nonprogrammable rate cutoffs (mean 191 ± 12 beats/min). During a mean follow-up of 25 ± 6 months, 6,029 episodes of VT were treated in the 14 patients. Only 103 ICD discharges were required (approximately one discharge per 60 episodes of VT). Ten of the 14 patients received discharges from their ICDs. No deaths have occurred. All devices remain active and in the automatic mode. Thus, an antitachycardia pacemaker and ICD combination can safely and effectively terminate VT in highly selected patients who are subjected to extensive preimplant testing. In such patients, the vast majority of episodes of VT can be terminated with antitachycardia pacing, and only rarely is a discharge required from the ICD.     

The Initial Clinical Experience with an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator/ Antitachycardia Pacemaker

Guardian antitachycardia pacing (ATP) 4210 is a third generation, multi-programmable cardioverter defibrillator undergoing Phase I clinical trials. The tiered response includes ATP, low energy cardioversion or defibrillation, and bradycardia support. Extensive telemetry is available, including an episode log and details of all episode events. Five patients underwent the implantation of Guardian ATP 4210 as part of a Phase I trial at the University of Louisville. Two of the five patients had multiple VT episodes that were reverted successfully using ATP pacing (slow VT) and defibrillation (fast VT) and VF episodes, which resulted in defibrillation therapy over a follow-up period of 6 to 8 months. Four of the five patients required bradycardia support for bradyarrhythmias unassociated with ATP therapy or defibrillation and one patient required bradycardia support postdefibrillation therapy. The device design is microprocessor based and requires continuous interrogation of the microprocessor memory and checks of the validity of programmed parameters to continue its operation. When the safety check fails, the device is designed to shut down its antitachycardia and defibrillator functions. This design feature has a potential for leaving the patient unprotected if the device shuts down. Modification of this feature is required to ensure the device's long-term safety.     

Antitachycardia Pacing in Patients with Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators: How Many Attempts Are Useful?

The purpose of this study was to determine the termination and acceleration rates for 1 to 6 attempts of antitachycardia pacing (ATP) delivered by ICD in order to terminate spontaneously occurring VTs. Twenty-four ICD recipients with active ATP programs, including a maximum of six ATP sequences and spontaneously occurring VTs during follow-up, were investigated. During a mean follow-up of 42 ± 15 months (range, 17–63 months) 413 spontaneous VT episodes (17 ± 14; range, 1–49 per patient) resulting in appropriate ATP delivery by the ICD occurred. ATP successfully terminated 328 episodes (80 %) with a mean number of 1.6 ± 1.1 pacing sequences. Eighty episodes (19%) were accelerated by ATP and 5 (1%) were unresponsive to ATP. The ATP success decreased until the third ATP sequence (59%→ 31%→ 24%), but increased again in the fourth to sixth attempt (46%→ 46%→ 29%). The acceleration rate increased from sequence one to sequence three (8%→ 13%→ 28%), but decreased significantly in further ATP attempts (19%→ 0%→ 0%). The mean time delays until redetection or termination after 4, 5, and 6 attempts of ATP were 22 ± 5 seconds, 37 ± 2 seconds, and 41 ± 9 seconds, respectively. Nine patients (37%) used ≥3 ATP attempts during follow-up and all of them had a therapeutic benefit from it. Five out of 13 VTs (38%) treated with ≥4 attempts could ultimately be terminated by ATP. The results of this study demonstrate that the first ATP sequence is the most effective and that > 4 ATP attempts may be useful in a minority of patients. There seems to be a low risk of VT acceleration by the fourth to sixth ATP sequence. Because of the associated time delay, a high number of ATP attempts should only be programmed in patients with hemodynamically well-tolerated stable VTs.     

Implantation of the Automatic Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (AICD): Practical Aspects

Most patients who are resuscitated from an episode of sudden cardiac death or one of sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) can now be treated using serial electrophysiologic testing as a guide to drug therapy. Recurrence rates are low if an antiarrhythmic regimen can be found which prevents induction of VT. Patients failing serial drug testing have a high recurrence rate (approximately 50%/year). Most clinicians now refer such patients for either experimental antiarrhythmic therapy or electrical intervention. The most promising of the electrical interventions (including tachycardia converting pacemakers and intraoperative mapping)has been the automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator (AICD). Only recently has the AICD been released from investigative status by the Food and Drug Administration. It can be implanted safely and with favorable clinical outcome if the techniques of implantation are well understood and used often. The text incorporates the authors' experience in implanting nearly 200 devices and is intended as a practical guide to the use of the AICD.     

Permanent Antitachycardia Pacemaker Therapy for Ventricular Tachycardia

This article describes our experience with an antitachycardia pacemaker alone (N = 3) or in combination with an automatic implontoble cardioverter defibrillator (AICD, N = 8) in the treatment of ventricular tochycardia. EJeven patients (mean ejection fraction 31%, mean oge 67 years) received an antitachycardia pacemaker. Nine had their units programmed for automatic antitachycardia pacing, one unit was programmed to automatic antitachycardia pacing by magnet activation only, and one to tachycardia detection and bradycardia support. Of the nine patients with automatic antitachycardia pacing, seven received appropriate and successful pace termination of spontaneous ventricular tachycardia at up to 120 times per month. Eight of these nine have had AICD implantations as well. There were no operative complications. Over a mean (± SD) follow-up of 12.1 ± 9.3 months (range 3–29 months), there have been two deaths, both due to heart failure. There have been four AICD discharges in three patients. Two units discharged in a clinically appropriate setting. The other two units, both with rate cutoffs <200 beats/min, were inadvertently triggered by the antitachycardia pacemaker and/or the underlying rate. In addition to the careful selection of the defibrillator rate cutoff, adverse device-device interactions were avoided by careful intraoperative lead positioning, and the disabling of bradycardia pacing when not needed or contraindicated. Antitachycardia pacing, with the safety provided by the AICD, is an effective treatment for patients with medically refractory ventricular tachycardia.     

Safety of Antitachycardia Pacing in Patients with Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators and Severely Depressed Left Ventricular Function

The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of antitachycardia pacing (ATP) in third-generation implantable Cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) for terminating spontaneously occurring ventricular tachycardias (VTs) in patients with severely depressed left ventricular (LV) function. Ninety-one patients with active ATP were followed for 16 ± 13 months. During this period, 775 VT episodes occurring in 36 patients were treated by ATP. The patients were divided into two groups according to their LV ejection fraction (LVEF): group A with LVEF ± 30% (n = 20), and group B with LVEF ± 30% (n = 16). There were no differences between both groups in age, gender, underlying heart disease, indication for ICD therapy, or drug therapy. The VT rates were comparable (group A: 183 ± 16 beats/min; group B: 180 ± 21 beats/min; P = NS). Eighty-three percent of all episodes (n = 332) in group A and 93% of the VTs (n = 443) in group B were ATP terminated (P ± 0.01). Ten percent of VTs in group A were accelerated by ATP into the ventricular fibrillation zone versus 2% in group B (P ± 0.01). The individual termination rate and acceleration rate per patient were comparable in both groups. All VT episodes unresponsive to ATP were converted by backup shocks. The efficacy of first-shock therapy was similar in both groups (group A: 89%; group B: 97%; P = NS). The proportion of patients who needed at least one backup shock for unsuccessful ATP was comparable in both groups (group A: 65%; group B: 56%; P= NS). We conclude that ATP is effective and safe in patients with recurrent VTs and severely depressed LV function, and it can be safely programmed in this group of patients to minimize the use of shock therapy.     

Termination of Malignant Ventricular Tachycardias by Use of an Automatical Defibrillator (AICD) in Combination with an Antitachycardial Pacemaker

We implanted an "Automatic Impiantable Converter-Defibrillalor" (AICD) and as far as useful an antitachycardial pacemaker (Intertach) in addition in 11 patients suffering from malignant ventricular tachycardias via a median sternotomy. In eight cases a coronary artery disease and in three cases a dilatative myopathy was the intrinsic disease. During surgery in all patients we attempted to trigger ventricular tachycardias and their termination by programmed stimulation. This procedure was successful in nine patients who received an antitachycardial pacemaker system. After the wounds healing, repeated induced ventricular tachycardias in all patients, who received a combination of the systems, could be terminated by the antitachycardial pacemaker prior to an intervention of the implanted defibrillator.     

Atrial Sensing to Augment Ventricular Tachycardia Detection by the Automatic Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator: A Utility Study

The triggering of automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator (AICD) discharges by supraventricular tachycardias, despite the presence of a probability density function algorithm, remains a limitation of an otherwise highly effective device. We systematically investigated the diagnostic utility which theroretically could derive form the addition of atrial sensing capability to the AICD in 25 patients with 30 inducible sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardias (VTs) at clinically relevant rates (greater than or equal to 150 beats/min). Patients were included only if they were not taking medication capable of depressing ventriculoatrial (VA) conduction for at least 5 half-lives prior to electrophysiological testing. We tested the simple criterion for VT that ventricular cycle length (CL) be shorter than the atrial CL (not met in sinus or most other supraventricular tachycardias). Mean VT CL was 283 +/- 47 ms (range 210 to 370). In 25 (83%) VTs, the VT criterion was consistently satisfied. Of the five cases in which the criterion was not met, 1:1 VA conduction during VT was present in four, three of which initially manifested 2:1 VA conduction lasting from 14 to 28 s and therefore would have transiently fulfilled the VT criterion. The remaining patient who failed to satisfy the VT criterion had ongoing atrial flutter during a relatively slower sustained VT, but this circumstance could be recognized because of the varying AV interval. The absence of 1:1 VA conduction at CLS less than or equal to 400 ms during ventricular pacing accurately predicted the absence of 1:1 VA conduction during VT in 95% of patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Modified Magnet Test for a Reversed Automatic Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator

We present the case of a 55-year-old man with atrial septal defect and cardiomyopathy who underwent implantation of an automatic cardioverter defibrillator (AICD) for ventricular tachycardia resulting in collapse. This case demonstrates multiple unusual complications related to AICD, including rotation of the pulse generator unit about its long axis requiring a "left-handed" magnet test to determine the appropriate counts.     

Anxiety and Anger in Patients with Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias. Responses after Automatic Internal Cardioverter Defibrillator Implantation

In order to assess the psychological profile of patients with malignant ventricular tachyarrhythmias, eight patients who underwent implantation of the automatic internal cardioverter defibrillator for refractory arrhythmias were evaluated. Six men and two women with a mean age of 53 years were examined with the Symptom Checklist-90, the State Trait Personality Inventory and a specifically designed questionnaire about the automatic internal cardioverter defibrillator. The group studied manifested high degrees of both anger and anxiety compared to normal controls or to other medically ill populations. The trait scores remained essentially unchanged before and after the AICD implantation. The state of anxiety was markedly reduced by 26 percentage points after implantation (P less than 0.01), while the state of anger remained unchanged. In evaluating the number of AICD discharges, it was observed that the number of discharges in the first 6 months was higher than that observed in the subsequent follow-up period (mean 30 months). The reduction in AICD discharges demonstrated a trend (P = 0.094). Patient acceptance of the automatic internal cardioverter defibrillator was high. They became accustomed to the pulse generator after a mean of 3.6 months. The defibrillator permitted resumption of normal activities. If the device became battery depleted, all patients would insist on replacement. The evaluation of this group of patients with malignant ventricular arrhythmias indicates a high degree of anxiety and anger, which potentially may influence outcome. The reduction in defibrillator discharges after the first 6 months in addition to a reduced state of anxiety is a relationship that merits further investigation.     

Patient Acceptance of the Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator in Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias

Besides surgical problems, recipierifs of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) are faced with psychological and social adjustments. Successful ICD therapy is influenced by the patients' perceived concerns regarding device, discharge, changes in life style, and complications. In order to assess patients' acceptance of the ICD, the psychological profile of 57 consecutive patients was evaluated using a specifically designed questionnaire and the State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). The results showed that 20 patients staled fear of ICD discharge, 12 patients revealed physical discomfort due to the device, and limited quality-of-life occurred in 8 patients. Fifty-five of 57 patients answered that it was worth having an ICD device implanted, 30 (53%) patients returned to active life, and 56 (98%) would advise another patient to undergo implantation if necessary. Overall, there was only a slight, but insignificant, decrease in the level of anxiety within the total patient population after ICD implantation. However, a comparison of two subgroups indicated that the state of anxiety was significantly higher in patients < 50 years of age as well as in patients having received > 5 shocks versus those > 50 years of age and having experienced < 5 shocks. In general, the acceptance of the ICD as a tool in managing life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmias is high. Besides the increased survival rate, quality-of-life and patient acceptance are important criteria for successful ICD therapy.     

Evaluation of Global and Regional Left Ventricular Function Using Two-Dimensional and M-Mode Echocardiography in Patients With an Automatic Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator

The effects of glued epicardial patch electrodes of the automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator on the left ventricular function was studied by two-dimensional and M-mode echocardiography in 15 patients. Pre- and postoperative end-diastolic and end-systolic left ventricular cross-sectional areas were evaluated using planimetry. Regional left ventricular wall motion at the level of the left ventricular patch electrode was analyzed by two end-diastolic and end-systolic perpendicular axes. Left ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic diameters as well as E-point-septal-separation and fractional shortening were analyzed using M-mode echocardiography. The mean time interval between preoperative echocardiograms and implantation of the automatic defibrillator was 0.3 X 1.3 (less than 1-2) months. Postoperative echocardiograms were recorded 6.6 +/- 6.9 (0.5-24) months after implantation of the device. There were no significant differences between pre- and postoperative mean values of end-diastolic and end-systolic areas and axes as well as M-mode echocardiographic parameters. Our data show that left ventricular patch electrodes do not significantly alter global or regional left ventricular function in patients after implantation of the automatic defibrillator.     

The Use and Interaction of Permanent Pacemakers and the Automatic Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator

The adverse interactions of permanent pacemakers and automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillators (AICD) were studied in nine patients in whom both devices were implanted. Both unipolar and bipolar pacemakers were evaluated. The permanent pacemakers were also used to do noninvasive electrophysiological studies and to induce ventricular fibrillation. Undersensing of ventricular fibrillation by the permanent pacemakers caused inappropriate pacemaker stimuli, which caused undersensing of ventricular fibrillation by the AICD in three of four patients with unipolar pacemakers. After an AICD discharge, pacemaker noncapture was seen in eight of 22 episodes for an average 4.9 seconds and inability to sense was seen in 11 of 20 episodes for an average 9.0 seconds. Counting of pacemaker stimuli and QRS by the AICD caused inappropriate discharges. Noninvasive electrophysiological testing by the pacemakers correlated with invasive testing. Furthermore, induction of ventricular fibrillation was successful in four of five patients attempted, though requiring long bursts at high outputs at the shortest cycle lengths obtainable by these pacemakers. Operation of the AICD and permanent pacemakers must be clearly understood to avoid adverse interactions of these devices.     

Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Events in Patients with Asymptomatic Nonsustained Ventricular Tachycardia:

Primary prevention trials have demonstrated that patients with coronary disease, reduced left ventricular function, and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT) have improved survival with implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy, presumably secondary to effective termination of life-threatening arrhythmias. However, stored intracardiac electrograms were not always available and specific arrhythmias leading to ICD therapy were not always known. We examined the occurrence of ICD events in 51 consecutive patients who match the described patient profile to determine the frequency of appropriate and inappropriate ICD therapy. ICD detections were noted in 18 (35%) patients during a median follow-up period of 13.1 months. Appropriate therapy for sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT)/ventricular fibrillation (VF) occurred in 11 (22%) patients, with appropriate shocks in 8 (16%) patients and appropriate antitachycardia pacing (ATP) in 4 (8%) patients. The time to first appropriate therapy occurred at a mean of 17 +/- 12 months (median 18 months, range 3-36 months). Inappropriate therapy occurred in 5 (10%) patients with inappropriate shocks in 4 patients and inappropriate ATP in 2 patients. Inappropriate therapy was delivered for supraventricular arrhythmias (SVAs) in 4 patients and for T wave oversensing in 1 patient. The reason for shock therapy was unknown in 1 patient (2%) due to ICD malfunction. The mean arrhythmia rate leading to appropriate therapy for VT/VF was 232 +/- 72 beats/min (range 181-400 beats/min), and the mean rate leading to inappropriate therapy for SVT was 168 +/- 10 beats/min (range 160-180 beats/min). Patients with coronary disease and asymptomatic NSVT commonly receive appropriate defibrillator therapy. These results support the need for ICD implantation for primary prevention, with attention to careful programming of the detection rate to prevent inappropriate therapy.     

Effectiveness of Noninvasive Programmed Stimulation for Initiating Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias in Patients with Third-Generation Implantable Cardioverter Definrillators

Previous generations of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) required invasive electrophysiological testing to assess defibrillator function. Newer third-generation ICDs include the capability for performing noninvasive programmed stimulation (NIPS) and may reduce the need for invasive studies to assess tachycardia recognition and antitachycardia therapy algorithms. The effectiveness of ICD-based NIPS for the induction of ventricular arrhythmias has not, however, been formally assessed. Third-generation ICDs were implanted in 79 patients, who underwent a total of 166 postoperative defibrillator tests. NIPS with rapid ventricular pacing was performed in all patients in an attempt to induce ventricular fibrillation. In patients with prior sustained uniform ventricular tachycardia, programmed stimulation with up to three extrastimuli was performed in order to attempt to initiate the clinical ventricular tachcardia. Ventricular fibrillation was induced with NIPS in 146 of 166 studies (88%). Ventricular tachycardia was initiated with NIPS in 104 of 123 studies (85%). The type of defibrillator and the use of endocardial or epicardial rate sensing/ pacing leads did not influence the efficacy of NIPS. NIPS with third-generation ICDs is generally effective at inducing ventricular fibrillation and clinically relevant ventricular tachycardias, and reduces the need to perform invasive electrophysiological testing following device implantation. In a minority of patients temporary transvenous pacing catheters must still be used to facilitate arrhythmia induction.