Botulinum toxin type A (BOTOX) for the prophylactic treatment of chronic daily headache: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A; BOTOX, Allergan, Inc.) for the prophylactic treatment of chronic daily headache (CDH). BACKGROUND: Several open-label and small controlled trials suggest that BoNT-A may be effective in the prophylactic treatment of headache. DESIGN AND METHODS: This was an 11-month, randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled study of BoNT-A for the treatment of patients aged 18 to 65 years old with 16 or more headache days per 30 days conducted at 13 North American study centers. Following a 30-day screening period and a 30-day, single-blind, placebo-response period to identify placebo responders, eligible patients from both the placebo responder and placebo nonresponder groups were injected with BoNT-A or placebo every 90 days and assessed every 30 days for 9 months, a period encompassing three treatment cycles. The primary efficacy measure was the change from baseline in the frequency of headache-free days in a 30-day period for the placebo nonresponder group at day 180, the chosen efficacy time point. The secondary efficacy measure was the proportion of patients with a decrease from baseline of 50% or more in the frequency of headache days per 30-day period for the placebo nonresponder group at day 180. The change from baseline in the frequency of headaches (per 30-day period), the proportion of patients with a decrease from baseline of 50% or greater in the frequency of headaches per 30-day period, acute medication use, and adverse events were also assessed. RESULTS: Of 571 patients assessed over the baseline period, 355 (mean age, 43.5 years; 300/355 [84.5%] female) were enrolled and randomized. At the end of the placebo run-in period, 279 patients (79%) were classified as placebo nonresponders and 76 patients (21%) as placebo responders. Subsequently, patients were randomized within each group to receive either BoNT-A or placebo. In the placebo nonresponder stratum, the mean number of headache-free days at baseline was 5.8 (+/-4.7) for BoNT-A- versus 5.5 (+/-4.7) for placebo-treated patients. At day 180, placebo nonresponders treated with BoNT-A had an improved mean change from baseline of 6.7 headache-free days per 30-day period compared to a mean change from baseline of 5.2 headache-free days for placebo-treated patients. The between-group difference of 1.5 headache-free days favored BoNT-A treatment, although the difference between the groups was not statistically significant. However, a statistically significant difference was observed at day 180 endpoint for the secondary efficacy measure. A significantly higher percentage of BoNT-A patients had a decrease from baseline of 50% or greater in the frequency of headache days per 30-day period at day 180 (32.7% vs. 15.0%, P=.027). Also, the mean change from baseline in the frequency of headaches per 30-day period at day 180 was -6.1 for BoNT-A patients vs. -3.1 for the placebo patients (P=.013). Only 4 of 173 BoNT-A patients (2.3%) discontinued the study due to adverse events. The majority of treatment-related adverse events were transient and mild to moderate in severity. CONCLUSIONS: BoNT-A treatment resulted in patients having, on average, approximately seven more (1 week) headache-free days compared to baseline. Although at the primary time point (day 180) the BoNT-A treatment resulted in a 1.5 between-group difference compared to placebo, this difference was not statistically significant. The treatment met secondary efficacy outcome measures, including the percentage of patients experiencing a 50% or more decrease in the frequency of headache days, in addition to statistically significant reductions in headache frequency. BoNT-A was also well tolerated in patients with CDH.     

Botulinum toxin type A as migraine preventive treatment in patients previously failing oral prophylactic treatment due to compliance issues

Objective.— To examine the efficacy and safety of and satisfaction with botulinum toxin type A (BoNTA; BOTOX^®: Allergan, Inc., Irvine, CA) for prophylactic treatment of migraine headache in patients previously failing prophylaxis because of issues pertaining to compliance. Background.— Numerous factors (eg, adverse effects, tolerability, cost, frequency of dosage, hesitancy to take daily medication, failure to complete treatment) negatively influence compliance with the preventive pharmacology for migraine prophylaxis. BoNTA may offer benefit in improving compliance because of its long duration of action, injectable route of administration, and its tolerability (adverse event [AE]) profile. Methods.— This was a randomized, double‐blind, single‐center, placebo‐controlled study (months 1 to 3) of BoNTA with a cross‐over to open‐label BoNTA treatment (months 4 to 6). Criteria for enrollment included patients with disabling headache (International Headache Society, International Classification of Headache Disorders [ICHD‐I] diagnosis 1.1, 1.2, 1.7, or 2.2, and Headache Impact Test [HIT]‐6 scores ≥56) previously failing prophylaxis because of compliance, tolerability, or adherence issues. After baseline evaluation, subjects were randomized 2 : 1 to a single set of BoNTA (139 units [U] total; 17 sites/6 muscle groups) or placebo injections. After month 3, only placebo‐treated subjects were eligible to receive BoNTA in the open‐label continuation study. Treatment outcomes were evaluated by headache episodes and days and maximum headache severity. Headache impact was assessed by the HIT‐6, Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) score, and Quality of Life (QoL) questionnaires. Treatment satisfaction was assessed with the Migraine Impact Questionnaire (MIQ), which included MIDAS and QoL. Results.— Of the 73 subjects screened, 61 (40 BoNTA; 21 placebo) with migraine headache diagnosis 1.1 and 1.2 who met all study criteria were enrolled in the 3‐month, blinded study, with 54 completing the study; 19 of 21 placebo‐treated subjects participated in the open‐label period (months 4 to 6), with 18 completing the study. Between‐group comparisons, demonstrated through analysis of the subjects' headache diaries, did not reach statistical significance at months 1 to 3 for the number of headache episodes or days (primary endpoint). At month 2, a decrease from baseline in the number of headache episodes (?0.99 ± 2.38; P = .0147 vs 0.42 ± 3.23; P = not significant [NS]) and headache days (?1.52 ± 3.84; P = .0194 vs 0.23 ± 4.67; P = NS) was noted in the BoNTA‐treated subjects but not in the placebo‐treated subjects, respectively. During the open‐label study, BoNTA‐treated subjects had a decrease in the number of headache episodes at months 5 and 6 (?1.58 ± 2.88 and ?1.58 ± 2.85, respectively; P < .05 vs baseline for both) and headache days at months 5 and 6 (?2.84 ± 4.47 and ?2.73 ± 4.86, respectively; P < .05 vs baseline for both). BoNTA did not affect maximum headache severity compared with baseline or placebo during the first 3 months of the study. A decrease in HIT‐6 scores was significantly greater for BoNTA‐treated subjects than for placebo‐treated subjects at month 3 (?7.77 vs ?3.58, P = .0466). Within‐group decreases in HIT‐6 scores were significant in BoNTA‐treated subjects during each month of the blinded trial (?5.10 ± 8.85, ?6.63 ± 7.49, ?7.77 ± 8.78 for months 1 to 3, respectively; P < .0001 for all vs baseline) and throughout the open‐label portion of the study (?7.89 ± 6.48, ?10.39 ± 10.81, ?9.00 ± 11.12 for months 4 to 6, respectively; P < .01 for all vs baseline). The within‐group decrease in placebo‐treated subjects was significant at months 1 and 3 (?3.35 ± 6.07 and ?3.58 ± 5.40, respectively; P < .05 for both). At 3 months, BoNTA was significantly better than placebo (P = .001) in the reduction of MIDAS total score. The change from baseline in the MIDAS total scores was significant in BoNTA‐treated subjects (?21.62 ± 38.70; P < .0001) but not in placebo recipients (4.76 ± 18.85; P = NS). BoNTA‐treated subjects showed improvement in 11 of 13 and 7 of 13 assessments of treatment satisfaction in MIQ at months 3 and 6, respectively, while the placebo group showed no improvement at any measured time interval in the study. At month 3 (blinded period), there were no treatment‐related AEs reported in both groups. However, there were 18 possible/probable occurrences of treatment‐related AEs in the BoNTA group. At month 6 (open‐label period), 4 treatment‐related AEs were reported, along with 2 possible occurrences. The majority of treatment‐related AEs were transient and mild to moderate in severity, with no subjects discontinuing the study because of AEs. Conclusions.— BoNTA‐treated subjects showed improvements from baseline in measures of headache frequency, and improvements from baseline and in comparison with placebo treatment in headache impact and treatment satisfaction at multiple time points in this study. However, BoNTA‐treated subjects did not differ from placebo‐treated subjects in measures of headache frequency and severity. BoNTA may be a useful treatment option for headache patients demonstrating poor compliance, adherence, or AE profile with oral prophylactic regimens.     

Botulinum toxin type a for the prophylaxis of chronic daily headache: subgroup analysis of patients not receiving other prophylactic medications: a randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled study

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A; BOTOX, Allergan, Inc., Irvine, CA) for the prophylaxis of headaches in patients with chronic daily headache (CDH) without the confounding factor of concurrent prophylactic medications. BACKGROUND: Several open-label studies and an 11-month, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study suggest that BoNT-A may be an effective therapy for the prophylaxis of headaches in patients with CDH. DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a subgroup analysis of an 11-month, randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled study of BoNT-A for the treatment of adult patients with 16 or more headache days per 30-day periods conducted at 13 North American study centers. All patients had a history of migraine or probable migraine. This analysis involved data for patients who were not receiving concomitant prophylactic headache medication and who constituted 64% of the full study population. Following a 30-day screening period and a 30-day single-blind, placebo injection, eligible patients were injected with BoNT-A or placebo and assessed every 30 days for 9 months The following efficacy measures were analyzed per 30-day periods: change from baseline in number of headache-free days; change from baseline in headache frequency; proportion of patients with at least 30% or at least 50% decrease from baseline in headache frequency; and change from baseline in mean headache severity. Acute medication use was assessed, and adverse events were recorded at each study visit. RESULTS: Of the 355 patients randomized in the study, 228 (64%) were not taking prophylactic medication and were included in this analysis (117 received BoNT-A, 111 received placebo injections). Mean age was 42.4+/-10.90 years; the mean frequency of headaches per 30 days at baseline was 14.1 for the BoNT-A group and 12.9 for the placebo group (P=.205). After two injection sessions, the maximum change in the mean frequency of headaches per 30 days was -7.8 in the BoNT-A group compared with only -4.5 in the placebo group (P=.032), a statistically significant between-group difference of 3.3 headaches. The between-group difference favoring BoNT-A treatment continued to improve to 4.2 headaches after a third injection session (P=.023). In addition, BoNT-A treatment at least halved the frequency of baseline headaches in over 50% of patients after three injection sessions compared to baseline. Statistically significant differences between BoNT-A and placebo were evident for the change from baseline in headache frequency and headache severity for most time points from day 180 through day 270. Only 5 patients (4 patients receiving BoNT-A treatment; 1 patient receiving placebo) discontinued the study due to adverse events and most treatment-related events were transient and mild to moderate in severity. CONCLUSIONS: BoNT-A is an effective and well-tolerated prophylactic treatment in migraine patients with CDH who are not using other prophylactic medications.     

Amitriptyline in the prophylactic treatment of migraine and chronic daily headache

(Headache 2011;51:33‐51) Objective and Background.— Amitriptyline is one of the most commonly used medications in migraine prophylaxis. There have been relatively few placebo‐controlled studies of amitriptyline in migraine prophylaxis or in treatment of chronic daily headache (CDH). This report deals with a large placebo‐controlled trial of amitriptyline vs placebo of 20 weeks duration that included subjects with intermittent migraine (IM) as well as CDH. The study was carried out between 1976 and 1979; however, results have never been fully reported. Methods.— Patients with a history of migraine as defined by the 1962 Ad Hoc Committee report were recruited for this study. Subjects had at least 2 headaches per month, and no limit was placed on the number of headaches per month that could be experienced. The study format included a 4‐week baseline period (Period A) in which all subjects received placebo in a dose of 2 pills per day for one week, 3 pills per day for one week and then 4 pills per day for 2 weeks. Subjects with at least 2 migraine headaches in this period were then entered into Period B and randomized into either amitriptyline or placebo tracks. Medication consisted of identical tablets containing either 25 mg amitriptyline or placebo. Period B was 4 weeks in duration with dose titration identical to Period A. The dose could be reduced if necessary to reduce side effects. The minimum dose was one pill per day. Period C was a 12‐week maintenance or stabilization period in which the patient continued the dose established by week 8 with visits at weeks 12, 16, and 20. Patients kept a headache calendar that was used for data collection. Headache frequency (per month), severity, and duration (hours) were the primary measurement parameters employed for data analysis. Results.— For the entire group, 391 subjects were entered into Period A, 338 were randomized into Period B, 317 (81%) subjects completed the first post‐randomization visit (8 weeks), 255 (65%) completed week 12, 210 (54%) completed week 16, and 186 (48%) completed week 20. Using headache frequency and evaluating parameters of (a) improvement, (b) no change, or (c) worsening relative to baseline, there was a significant improvement in headache frequency for amitriptyline over placebo at 8 weeks (P = .018) but not at 12, 16, or 20 weeks. When amitriptyline and placebo patients were compared for headache frequency at 8, 12, 16, and 20 weeks to their own placebo stabilization period at 4 weeks, statistically significant improvement vs worsening was seen in headache frequency at each evaluation point for both amitriptyline and placebo groups (P ≤ .01) reaching 50% reporting a decrease in frequency in each group and approximately 10% reporting worsening by week 20. There were no significant differences in headache severity or duration between amitriptyline and placebo groups at anytime during the study. Within the study sample, there were 36 amitriptyline and 22 placebo subjects who had headaches ≥17 days/month that fit the current definition of CDH by the Silberstein‐Lipton criteria. These were analyzed separately as a subgroup for comparison of amitriptyline vs placebo using a metric of (1) no change or worsening; (2) up to a 50% improvement; and (3) ≥50% improvement in headache frequency. Amitriptyline was superior to placebo in number with improvement in frequency of ≥50% at 8 weeks (25% vs 5% [P = .031]) and at 16 weeks (46% vs 9% [P = .043]). There was a trend for amitriptyline to be superior to placebo at 12 and 20 weeks but this did not reach significance. Conclusions.— In this study, using headache frequency as the primary metric, for the entire group, amitriptyline was superior to placebo in migraine prophylaxis at 8 weeks but, because of a robust placebo response, not at subsequent time points. For the subgroup with CDH, amitriptyline was statistically significantly superior to placebo at 8 weeks and 16 weeks with a similar but nonsignificant trend at 12 and 20 weeks. Compared with placebo amitriptyline is effective in CDH. Amitriptyline was also significantly effective in IM compared intragroup to its own baseline; however, placebo was equally effective in the same analysis. The reason for the robust placebo response in the IM group is not clear, but has been occasionally reported.     

Botulinum toxin type a prophylactic treatment of episodic migraine: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled exploratory study

OBJECTIVE: This exploratory trial evaluated the safety and efficacy of multiple treatments of botulinum toxin type A (BoNTA; BOTOX, Allergan, Inc., Irvine, CA, USA) as prophylactic treatment of episodic migraine headaches. DESIGN AND METHODS: This was an 11-month randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, exploratory study. Patients were screened during a 30-day baseline period, and eligible patients with 4 or more migraine episodes and < or =15 headache days entered a single-blind 30-day placebo run-in period. Patients were classified as placebo nonresponders (PNR) if they had at least 4 moderate-to-severe migraine episodes and did not experience at least a 50% decrease from baseline in the frequency of migraine episodes following their placebo treatment. All other subjects were classified as placebo responders (PR). Patients were randomized within each stratum (PNR, PR) to 3 treatments with BoNTA (110 to 260 U of BoNTA per treatment cycle) or placebo at 90-day intervals using a modified follow-the-pain treatment paradigm. The primary efficacy outcome measure was the mean change from baseline in the frequency of migraine episodes for the 30 days prior to day 180 in the PNR group. Secondary efficacy measures included the proportion of patients with a decrease from baseline of 50% or more migraine episodes per 30-day period. Patients were allowed to take concomitant acute and prophylactic headache medications. Adverse events were reported. RESULTS: A total of 809 patients were screened and 369 patients (89.2% female; mean age, 45 years; range, 20 to 65 years) entered the placebo run-in period and were subsequently randomized to BoNTA or placebo. The mean total dose of BoNTA was 190.5 units (U) (range, 110 U to 260 U). The predetermined primary efficacy endpoint was not met. Substantial mean improvements of 2.4 and 2.2 fewer migraine episodes per month at day 180 in the PNR stratum treated with BoNTA and placebo, respectively, were observed (P > .999). From day 180 through the end of the study (day 270) at least 50% of all patients in each treatment group had a decrease from baseline of 50% or more migraine episodes per 30-day period. However, in the group of patients with > or =12 headache days at baseline (and < or =15 headache days), BoNTA patients experienced a mean change from baseline of -4.0 headache episodes at day 180 compared with -1.9 headache episodes in the placebo group (P= .048). The majority of treatment-related adverse events were transient and mild to moderate in severity. Only 7 patients (1.9%) discontinued the study due to adverse events (6 BoNTA, 1 placebo). CONCLUSION: There were no statistically significant between-group differences in the mean change from baseline in the frequency of migraine episodes per 30-day period. There were substantial, sustained improvements during the course of the study in all groups. Multiple treatments with BoNTA were shown to be safe and well tolerated over an active treatment period lasting 9 months.     

Chronic daily headache prophylaxis with tizanidine: a double-blind,placebo-controlled,multicenter outcome study

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of tizanidine hydrochloride versus placebo as adjunctive prophylactic therapy for chronic daily headache (chronic migraine, migrainous headache, or tension-type headache). BACKGROUND: Tizanidine is an alpha2-adrenergic agonist that inhibits the release of norepinephrine at both the spinal cord and brain, with antinociceptive effects that are independent of the endogenous opioid system. Previous open-label studies have suggested the drug may be effective for treatment of chronic daily headache. METHODS: Two hundred patients completed a 4-week, single-blind, placebo baseline period, with 134 fulfilling selection criteria and then randomized to tizanidine or placebo. Ninety-two patients completed at least 8 weeks of treatment (tizanidine, n = 45; placebo, n = 47), and 85 patients completed 12 weeks of treatment (tizanidine, n = 44; placebo, n = 41). Most patients (77%) met the diagnostic criteria for migraine of the International Headache Society; 23% had either chronic migrainous headache or chronic tension-type headache. Tizanidine was slowly titrated over 4 weeks to 24 mg or the maximum dose tolerated (mean, 18 mg; SD, 6.4; median, 20.0; range, 2 to 24), divided equally over three dose intervals per day. Overall headache index ([headache days x average intensity x duration in hours]/28 days) was the primary end point. RESULTS: Tizanidine was shown to be superior to placebo in reducing the overall headache index (P =.0025), as well as mean headache days per week (P =.0193), severe headache days per week (P =.0211), average headache intensity (P =.0108), peak headache intensity (P =.0020), and mean headache duration (P =.0127). The mean percentage improvement during the last 4 weeks of treatment with tizanidine versus placebo was 54% versus 19% for the headache index (P =.0144), 55% versus 21% for severe headache days (P =.0331), 35% versus 19% for headache duration (P =.0142), 35% versus 20% for peak headache intensity (P =.0106), 33% versus 20% for average headache intensity (P =.0281), and 30% versus 22% for total headache days (P =.0593). Patients receiving tizanidine also scored higher ratings of overall headache improvement on a visual analog scale (P =.0069). There was no statistically significant difference in outcome for patients with chronic migraine versus those with only migrainous or tension-type headache. Adverse effects reported by more than 10% of the patients included somnolence (47%), dizziness (24%), dry mouth (23%), and asthenia (19%). Dropouts due to adverse events did not differ significantly between tizanidine and placebo. CONCLUSIONS: The results support tizanidine as an effective prophylactic adjunct for chronic daily headache, including migraine, migrainous headache, and tension-type headache. These results also suggest the possible importance of an alpha2-adrenergic mechanism underlying the pathophysiology of this spectrum of headache disorders.     

Effect of botulinum toxin A injections in the treatment of chronic tension-type headache: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

In addition to vascular and supraspinal influences, contraction of craniofacial muscles or central sensitization processes following continuous nociceptive input of craniofacial muscles may play an important role in the pathogenesis of tension-type headache. Chemodenervation induced by botulinum toxin injection is successfully used to decrease muscle tension. If muscle tension is important in this type of headache, then botulinum toxin could be helpful in its treatment. We conducted a randomized, placebo-controlled study to examine the effect of 20 U botulinum toxin injected into frontal and temporal muscles in patients with chronic tension-type headache. During a baseline of 4 weeks and a posttreatment period of 8 weeks, the effect was evaluated with daily records and the West Haven-Yale Multidimensional Pain Inventory. Some improvement in affective variables were demonstrated in the botulinum group, but important outcome variables, such as pain intensity, the number of pain-free days, and consumption of analgesics, were not statistically different between the groups. Reasons for these moderate effects may include the injection sites, dose of botulinum toxin, and duration of treatment.     

Prophylactic pharmacological treatment of chronic daily headache

Objective.—To review all the prophylactic pharmacological treatments for chronic daily headache from the past decade.
Background.—Chronic daily headache is among the most common diagnoses seen in specialized headache centers. Prior to 1988, there were no criteria for the diagnosis of chronic tension-type headache and chronic daily headache. An expanded chronic daily headache classification has been proposed.
Methods.—A MEDLINE search was performed using the following key words: chronic daily headache, intractable headache, transformed migraine, chronic tension headache, and chronic tension-type headache. We limited our review to those studies published in English in the last decade, including published abstracts and letters to the editor. Double-blind studies carried out prior to 1988 were also included.
Results.—Pharmacological treatments for chronic daily headache include antidepressants (tricyclics, tetracyclics, monoamine oxidase inhibitors, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors), anticonvulsants, muscle relaxants, 5-HT₁ agonists, ergots, 5-HT₂ antagonists, antianxiety agents, and miscellaneous drugs. Many of these reports are anecdotal, and most are open rather than double-blind studies.
Conclusions.—There is a great variety of pharmacological treatments available for chronic daily headache. Only the antidepressants have been extensively studied. Other medications may be used if these fail. Recommendations based on our experience at the Headache Unit of the Montefiore Medical Center are outlined here.     

Predictors of response to botulinum toxin type A (BoNTA) in chronic daily headache

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate predictors of response to botulinum toxin type A (BoNTA; BOTOX, Allergan Inc., Irvine, CA, USA) in patients with chronic daily headache (CDH). BACKGROUND: Chronic migraine (CM) and chronic tension-type headache (CTTH) form the majority of CDH disorders. Controlled trials indicate that BoNTAis effective in reducing the frequency of headache and number of headache days in patients with CDH disorders. A recent migraine study found that patients with imploding or ocular types of headaches were responders to BoNTA, whereas those with exploding headaches were not. To date, there are no data on factors that might predict response to BoNTA in patients with CDH. METHODS: A total of 71 patients with CM and 11 patients with CTTH were treated with 100 units BoNTA. Every patient received at least 2 sets of injections at intervals of 12-15 weeks; fixed sites, fixed dose, and "follow-the-pain" approaches were used for the injections. A detailed medical history was taken for each patient in addition to recording Migraine Disability Assessment Scale (MIDAS) scores at baseline and every 3 months after each set of injections. Headache frequency was assessed throughout the study from baseline to weeks 24-27. Patients recorded the frequency, severity, and duration of headaches in Headache Diaries. Patients were divided into responders (> or = 50% reduction in both headache frequency and MIDAS scores compared with baseline) and nonresponders (< 50% reduction in either of the above variables). Variables analyzed for predictors of response include headache that is predominantly unilateral or bilateral in location, presence of cutaneous allodynia (scalp allodynia), and presence of pericranial muscle tenderness (also referred to as muscle allodynia). Chi-square analysis was used for parallel-group comparisons (proportion of CM responders vs proportion of CM nonresponders and proportion of CTTH responders vs proportion of CTTH nonresponders). RESULTS: In the CM group, 76.1% (54 /71) of patients were responders to BoNTA, of which 68.5% (37/54) had headache that was predominantly unilateral in location and the remaining 31.5% (17/54) had headache that was predominantly bilateral in location (both P < .01 vs CM nonresponders). Of the 23.9% (17/71) CM nonresponders, 76.5% (13/17) reported predominantly bilateral headache and in the remaining 23.5% (4/17) the headache was unilateral. In the CM responders group, 81.5% (44/54) had clinically detectable scalp allodynia, while pericranial muscle tenderness was present in 61.1% (33/54) (both P < .01 vs CM nonresponders). The presence of scalp allodynia and pericranial muscle tenderness in the CM nonresponders was 11.8% (2/17) and 17.6% (3/17), respectively. In the CTTH group where all patients (100%, 11/11) had bilateral headache, 36.4% (4/11) of patients were responders to BoNTA. All of those CTTH responders (100%, 4/4) had pericranial muscle tenderness (P < .05 vs CTTH nonresponders). None of the CTTH nonresponders had pericranial muscle tenderness. No clinically significant serious adverse events (AEs) were reported. Mild AEs, eg, injection-site pain that persisted for 1-9 days, were reported in 11 patients. One patient had transient brow ptosis. CONCLUSIONS: A greater percentage of patients with CM responded to BoNTA than patients with CTTH. Headaches that were predominantly unilateral in location, presence of scalp allodynia, and pericranial muscle tenderness appear to be predictors of response to BoNTA in CM, whereas in CTTH, pericranial muscle tenderness may be a predictor of response.     

Botulinum toxin A for chronic daily headache: a randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel design study

Sixty patients with headaches of more than 15 days per month were recruited for this double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel study of botulinum toxin type A (BTX) for chronic tension type and chronic migraine headaches. The primary efficacy point was the number of headache-free days as assessed by diary for 12 weeks after BTX injection. Secondary efficacy points included global impressions, the use of abortive headache medications, and palpation. After recruitment, subjects kept diaries for 4 weeks prior to randomization, at which time they received either 200 U of BTX or matching placebo and were followed. After the week-12 evaluation, patients were offered 200 U of BTX (open label), and were similarly followed for another 12 weeks. The mean days with headache of the 60 subjects (49 female, mean age 47 +/- 11 years) was 23 +/- 7 out of 30. Both groups were demographically similar (58 completed). Over a 12-week period after injections, headache-free days had improved in the BTX group from week 8 to 12 (P < 0.05), and strongly tended to improve over the entire 12-week period, 33 +/- 23 vs. 24 +/- 16 days without headache (P = 0.07), but did not meet the a priori significance criteria. The subject global impressions (P < 0.05), subject change in headache impressions (P < 0.005), and investigator global impressions (P < 0.001) all improved in the BTX group compared with placebo. Adverse events were mild and did not differ between groups. At week 24 (open label), headache-free days were less in the twice BTX injected group compared with the once injected group, 40 +/- 26 vs. 26 +/- 19 (P < 0.05). BTX may help chronic daily headache and appears to have a cumulative effect with subsequent injections. The treatment was very well tolerated.     

Nefazodone for chronic daily headache prophylaxis: an open-label study

OBJECTIVE: To assess effectiveness, tolerability, and safety of nefazodone as a prophylactic agent for chronic daily headache. BACKGROUND: Nefazodone is a potent, selective 5-HT2 antagonist with a distinct and atypical mechanism of action. The evolution of intermittent migraine to chronic daily headache has been linked to up-regulation of 5-HT2 receptors as well as other factors. Other effective migraine prophylactic medications are also 5-HT2 antagonists. Although research has shown nefazodone to be an effective antidepressant with a good tolerability and safety profile, its potential role in headache prophylaxis has not been tested. DESIGN: This was a two-center, open-label study with a 4-week baseline, followed by 12 weeks of treatment with nefazodone at a median dose of 300 mg (mean, 303.66 +/- 65.57 mg; range, 100 to 450 mg depending on tolerability). Potential patients were required to report more than 15 days of headache per month for at least 3 months prior to screening. Only patients with at least 15 days of recorded headache during baseline were included in the final sample (N=52). Most patients (n=48) had a history of migraine based on International Headache Society criteria; 4 had primarily chronic tension-type headache, but with more migrainous features than permitted by International Headache Society criteria for a primary chronic tension-type headache diagnosis. RESULTS: Significant improvement was demonstrated for all headache diary measures, with significance levels ranging from P<.00001 for average intensity, duration, headache index (intensity x duration), peak intensity, headache days per week, and peak impairment, to P<.0033 for severe headache days per week, and P<.0051 for rescue medication days. During the last month of treatment, 71% of the patients completing the study showed at least a 50% reduction in headache index compared to baseline, and 59% had at least a 75% improvement. Visual analog scales completed at 4-week intervals showed significant improvement in patient ratings of overall headache status, quality of life, sleep, mood (P<.00001), and sexual function (P<.00053). Significant improvements were also observed in the Pain Disability Index (P<.00007), Beck Depression Inventory-II (P<.00001), Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (P<.0008), and Hamilton Psychiatric Rating Scale for Anxiety (P<.00007). Headache indices for patients in the top quartile on the depression and anxiety scales (clinical depression/anxiety) did not differ from the other patients during baseline. However, patients who were depressed or anxious showed significantly more improvement over the course of 12 weeks of treatment (P<.0006 or less for the depression scales, P<.026 for anxiety). Common mild to moderate adverse events reported by 10% or more of the patients included fatigue, nausea, dry mouth, dizziness, sleep disturbance, blurred vision, irritability/nervousness, and sedation. Only 5 of the 52 patients discontinued the study due to adverse events: headache (2 patients), and nausea, sleep disturbance, and a drugged feeling (1 patient each). CONCLUSIONS: These results provide preliminary support for the efficacy of nefazodone in the prophylaxis of chronic daily headache. In this sample, nefazodone was safe and generally well tolerated. Patient ratings of sexual function improved over the course of treatment, in contrast to what is generally observed with most antidepressants. Nefazodone may be particularly beneficial for patients with chronic daily headache and comorbid depression. Further research is indicated.     

Cusums to measure chronic daily headache

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether cumulated summed differences (cusums) can be used as a method for detecting effective interventions in chronic daily headache (CDH). If so, then can such interventions be detected sooner than 28 days? BACKGROUND: CDH probably represents the greatest current challenge in the field of headache treatment. Clinical trial methodologies for its study are not standardized but usually use fixed 28-day observation periods. Similarly, 28-day observation periods are common review intervals for stepped-care patient management strategies. METHODS: A theoretical patient was modeled, with daily headache scores that had maximal variation for 28 consecutive daily measures. The cusums for this "norm" or control data set were plotted and correlated with time using a simple spreadsheet. Departure of a postintervention cusum from the 95% confidence interval of the control data set was chosen as an indicator of sensitivity to various model perturbations that had clinical correlates. RESULTS: When 1 to 17 randomly distributed headache-free days were used to perturb the 28-day model, cusums consistently diverged from the norm. If at least 3 headache-free days occurred, then the cusum detected the intervention in less than 28 days of observation. Reanalysis of a previously published study of magnesium oxide suggests that its negative conclusions should be reconsidered. CONCLUSION: Cusums can be useful tools for detecting change in CDH, whether at the level of the clinical trial or when managing patients using stepped-care treatment algorithms.     

Long-term benefits of botulinum toxin type A (BOTOX) in chronic daily headache: a five-year long experience

Botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) has been recently suggested as prophylaxis therapy for the treatment of primary headache chronic forms. Several studies on its efficacy are available, but results are often contradictory and not univocal. The effects of BoNTA on chronic forms of both tension- type headache and migraine have been investigated. In this study we introduce our five-year long experience with BoNT-A (Botox, Allergan, Irvine, CA). The employed dosage was 100 U and the Fixed Sites-Fixed Doses (FSFD) protocol was used. The period of study was April 2001 to July 2006. A sum of 1347 patients suffering from chronic daily headache (CDH) were treated. We registered in these patients the number of headache days per month and observed their reduction in relation to the number of injections. The best results were found after 12 months of treatment, with patients being free of attacks 23 days per month. The BoNT-A treatment was safe and well tolerated, as only 1.6% of patients reported adverse events, and they were all mild and transient. In conclusion, BoNT-A therapy appears to be an efficacious new therapeutic choice in the prophylaxis of CDH, especially for patients not responding to previous prophylactic treatments.     

Repetitive intravenous prochlorperazine treatment of patients with refractory chronic daily headache

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the efficacy and long-term outcome of intravenous prochlorperazine for the treatment of refractory chronic daily headache. BACKGROUND: Unlike dihydroergotamine, the treatment results of intravenous neuroleptics as first-line agents for refractory chronic daily headache have rarely been reported. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the data of inpatients with refractory chronic daily headache who received intravenous repetitive prochlorperazine treatment from November 1996 to March 1999. A semistructured telephone follow-up interview was done in September 1999. RESULTS: A total of 135 patients (44 men, 91 women) were recruited, including 95 (70%) with analgesic overuse. After intravenous prochlorperazine treatment, 121 (90%) achieved a 50% or greater reduction of headache intensity, including 85 (63%) who became headache-free. The mean hospital stay was 6.2 +/- 2.7 days, and mean total prochlorperazine used was 98 +/- 48 mg. Acute extrapyramidal symptoms occurred in 21 patients (16%). One hundred twenty-four patients (92%) were successfully followed up, with a mean duration of 14.3 +/- 7.5 months. Compared with pretreatment status, 93 patients (75%) considered their headache intensity decreased, and 86 patients (69%) considered their headache frequency decreased, although 40 (32%) still had a daily headache. Of the 87 patients with analgesic overuse who could be followed, 61 (70%) no longer overused analgesics. Poor response to prochlorperazine treatment (relative risk, 1.8) and presence of major depression (relative risk, 1.8) were predictors of persistent chronic daily headache at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Prochlorperazine was effective and safe in the treatment of patients with refractory chronic daily headache with or without analgesic overuse. Compared with dihydroergotamine, prochlorperazine seemed less effective at achieving "freedom from headache" during hospitalization, but had a similar outcome at follow-up.     

Management of chronic daily headache utilizing a uniform treatment pathway

OBJECTIVE: To determine if the use of a uniform treatment pathway might be effective in treating patients with primary chronic daily headache. METHODS: Thirty-three consecutive patients with primary chronic daily headache were managed according to a treatment pathway which involved sequential administration of divalproex sodium, amitriptyline, amitriptyline plus phenelzine, or methadone. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients (67%) reported a 50% or greater reduction in headache days per month following initiation of treatment. Most positive treatment responses (17 [77%] of 22) were attributed to divalproex sodium. CONCLUSION: Implementation of a uniform treatment pathway may result in significant clinical improvement in a sizable proportion of patients with chronic daily headache.     

肉毒毒素A治疗颈源性头痛的双盲研究

目的:颈部骨骼肌源性头痛目前尚无治疗的有效方法,观察肉毒毒素A治疗颈部骨骼肌源性头痛的疗效。方法:采用双盲原则,将40例颈源性头痛患者随机分为治疗组和对照组,分别接受浓度为50 u/ml肉毒毒素A溶液和生理盐水颈部多个肌筋膜扳机点注射。结果:头痛情况采用头痛月天数和头痛指数进行评估,治疗组在治疗后两周、四周时头痛月天数(2.0±2.4,2.2±2.6)和头痛指数(2.5±3.5,3.5±3.6)明显减低,和对照组(14.6±5.2,16.1±5.2和24.2±14.1,26.3±11.2)及治疗前(14.7±5.8和32.6±19.6)差异均有显著性意义(P<0.01)。结论:肉毒毒素A颈部肌筋膜扳机点注射是治疗颈部骨骼肌源性头痛的有效方法。     

Botulinum toxin type A as an effective prophylactic treatment in primary headache disorders

OBJECTIVE: To measure the effect of botulinum toxin type A (Botox, Allergan, Inc, Irvine, CA) treatment in 271 patients diagnosed with headache in accordance with International Headache Society (IHS) criteria. BACKGROUND: Botulinum toxin type A has shown promise for the treatment of headache in several clinical trials, but uncertainty remains as to how botulinum toxin type A optimally should be used for treating headache and which patients are best suited for this treatment. METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review of all patients who received botulinum toxin type A for the treatment of headache from January 1999 to February 2002. Patients were injected with an average dose of 63.2 U (SD, 14.5) of botulinum toxin type A on 2 or more visits, with treatments involving a "fixed-site" or a "follow-the-pain" (or a combination of both) approach. In the fixed-site approach, botulinum toxin type A was injected into the procerus, corrugator, frontalis, and temporalis muscles. In the follow-the-pain approach, botulinum toxin type A was injected into a combination of the procerus, corrugator, frontalis, temporalis, occipitalis, trapezius, and/or semispinalis capitis muscles. The primary outcomes for the trial were the reduction in headache days per month or headache intensity (0 to 3 scale) (or both) from baseline. Patients were diagnosed according to IHS criteria and subsequently classified into the following categories: chronic daily headache (more than 15 headache days per month), episodic tension-type headache, episodic migraine, and "mixed" HA (less than 15 headache days per month, combination of migraine and tension-type headache). RESULTS: Treatment period was an average of 8.6 months (SD, 6.4); patients received an average of 3.4 doses (SD, 1.6) 3 months apart. Of the 271 patients, 29 (10.7%) had episodic migraine, 17 (6.3%) had episodic tension-type headache, 71 (26.2%) had mixed headache, and 154 (56.8%) had chronic daily headache. Two-hundred fifty-six patients had data for the number of headache days per month, 117 had data for headache intensity, and all 271 had data for headache days or headache intensity. Botulinum toxin type A treatment significantly reduced the number of headache days per month from 18.9 (SD, 10.3) to 8.3 (SD, 8.9) (n=256, P<.001)--a 56% reduction. Headache intensity decreased from 2.4 points (SD, 0.6) to 1.8 points (SD, 0.8) (n=117, P<.001)--a 25% reduction. Of 263 patients surveyed, 225 (85.6%) reported improvement in headache frequency and intensity. There was no correlation of effect/lack of effect with reason for treatment, duration/number of treatments, injection technique, mean/total dose, age, gender, or comorbidity. Approximately 95% of patients did not experience medication side effects. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that botulinum toxin type A may be an effective and safe prophylactic treatment for a variety of moderate to severe chronic headache types.     

Botulinum toxin type A in the prophylactic treatment of chronic tension-type headache: a multicentre, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study

We studied the safety and efficacy of 0 U, 50 U, 100 U, 150 U (five sites), 86 Usub and 100 Usub (three sites) botulinum toxin type A (BoNTA; BOTOX); Allergan, Inc., Irvine, CA, USA) for the prophylaxis of chronic tension-type headache (CTTH). Three hundred patients (62.3% female; mean age 42.6 years) enrolled. For the primary endpoint, the mean change from baseline in the number of TTH-free days per month, there was no statistically significant difference between placebo and four BoNTA groups, but a significant difference favouring placebo vs. BoNTA 150 was observed (4.5 vs. 2.8 tension headache-free days/month; P = 0.007). All treatment groups improved at day 60. Although efficacy was not demonstrated for the primary endpoint, at day 90, more patients in three BoNTA groups had >or=50% decrease in tension headache days than did placebo (P 相似文献   

Botulinum toxin type A for the treatment of nummular headache: four case studies

OBJECTIVE: We assessed the efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin type A (BoNTA; BOTOX): Allergan, Inc., Irvine, CA, USA) in patients with nummular headache who did not respond to other treatments including nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), local anesthetics, and/or gabapentin. BACKGROUND: Nummular headache is characterized by circumscribed round or elliptical areas of fluctuating mild-to-moderate head pain in a chronic or remitting pattern. It is a relatively rare primary headache disorder that responds poorly to adequate treatment trials with local anesthetic, migraine, or neuropathic pain agents or NSAIDs. METHODS: Four patients aged 35-58 years with intractable nummular headaches were given 25 units of BoNTA divided among 10 injection sites in and around the circumscribed affected areas of pain, paresthesia, and allodynia. All patients had 2 sets of injections approximately 14 weeks apart. RESULTS: All patients met the International Headache Society criteria for nummular headache (International Classification of Headache Disorders, A13.7.1). Patients were female; mean age of onset was 42 years. Average disease duration prior to BoNTA treatment was 3.75 years. One patient reported concurrent episodic migraine and another reported concurrent tension-type headache. Patients reported round-shaped (n = 2; 6 and 3 cm in diameter), oval (n = 1; 4 x 2 cm), and elliptical (n = 1; 6 cm in length) areas of pain. Painful symptoms were reported in the right parietal convexity (n = 2) and the posterior frontal, unilaterally (n = 2). All patients experienced spontaneous or stimuli-triggered exacerbations and variable combinations of sensory disturbances, including allodynia, tenderness, and paresthesia. The temporal pattern was continuous in 3 patients and intermittent in one. Both the size and shape of the pain remained unchanged in all patients since the onset of nummular headache symptoms. Six to 10 days following BoNTA treatment, all patients experienced a reduction in nummular headache symptoms, which lasted approximately 14 weeks on average. Repeat injections gave the same degree of improvement. No treatment-related adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: BoNTA appears to be a well-tolerated effective treatment for intractable, persistent nummular headache in patients with an inadequate response to other treatments including NSAIDs, gabapentin, or local anesthetics.