Treatment Journeys of Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (NDMM): Results From The Connect MM Registry

Sankey plots were generated to illustrate the heterogeneity of treatment sequences and transitions over time in real-world patients from the Connect Multiple Myeloma (MM) Registry. Plots identified immunomodulatory agents and proteasome inhibitors as the mainstays of treatment for patients who did or did not receive stem cell transplant. More patients received stem cell transplant (shown above) and continued to second-line treatment, which highlights the need to choose optimal first-line regimens – particularly for patients without a transplant intent. Abbreviations: IMiD = Immunomodulatory imide; 1L = first-line; 3L = third-line; PFS = progression-free survival; PI = proteasome inhibitor; SCT = stem cell transplant.

1. Download : Download high-res image (285KB)
2. Download : Download full-size image

     

Effect of t (11;14) Abnormality on Outcomes of Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma in the Connect MM Registry

BackgroundThe t (11;14) (q13;32) translocation [t (11;14)] is present in ∼20% of patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM), but studies examining its prognostic ability have yielded divergent results, and data are lacking on outcomes from first-line therapy.Patients and MethodsData from the Connect MM Registry, a large US, multicenter, prospective observational cohort study of patients with NDMM were used to examine the effect of t (11;14) status on first-line therapy outcomes in the Overall population (n = 1574) and race groups (African American [AA] vs. non-African American [NAA]).ResultsBaseline characteristics were generally similar between patients with (n = 378) and without (n = 1196) t (11;14). Prevalence of t (11;14) was similar by race (AA, 27%; NAA, 24%). In the overall population, regardless of first-line therapy, t (11;14) status did not affect progression-free survival (hazard ratio, 1.02; P = 0.7675) or overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.99; P = .9417). AA patients with t (11;14) had higher likelihood of death (Nominal Cox regression P = .0298) vs. patients without t (11;14).ConclusionsAcknowledging observational study and inferential limitations, this exploratory analysis of a predominantly community-based population suggests that t (11;14) is a neutral prognostic factor in the general MM population but may be a negative factor for overall survival in AA patients.     

Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Bortezomib Re-Treatment in Patients With Multiple Myeloma

IntroductionBortezomib is administered for a finite course; thus, patients might remain sensitive to bortezomib-based therapy at relapse. We report a meta-analysis of bortezomib-based retreatment in relapsed/refractory myeloma.Patients and MethodsA systematic literature review identified studies of bortezomib-based retreatment in relapsed/refractory myeloma. Proportions of bortezomib-refractory patients and additional prognostic factors were extracted and used in weighted stratified analyses of TTP and OS. Random-effect pooled estimates were calculated for overall response rate (ORR) and rates of common AEs.ResultsTwenty-three studies (n = 1051 patients) were identified. Bortezomib was administered intravenously in all studies. Across studies in which data were available, pooled, weighted average ORR was 39.1% (95% confidence interval, 30.8%-47.4%), and pooled, weighted average median TTP and OS were 7.5 and 16.6 months, respectively. Patients with fewer previous therapies (≤ 4) and relapsed (not refractory) patients achieved higher ORRs, of 43.4% and 57.2%, respectively. Random-effects meta-regression analysis confirmed that relapsed patients were associated with a higher ORR by 28 to 41 percentage points versus refractory patients. In relapsed patients, median TTP and OS were 8.5 and 19.7 months, respectively. Common Grade 3/4 AEs included thrombocytopenia (35%), neutropenia (15%), anemia (14%), pneumonia (10%), and peripheral neuropathy (3%).ConclusionBased on these findings, bortezomib retreatment is well tolerated and appears efficacious in relapsed patients. In an era of new and emerging treatment options for relapsed and/or refractory myeloma, these data indicate that bortezomib retreatment might be a highly effective option in previously treated patients.     

Outcomes of Transplant-Eligible Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma After Second-Line Salvage Chemotherapy: The Gustave Roussy Experience

IntroductionAfter failure of frontline therapy, patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (RR-DLBCL) that does not respond to first-line salvage chemotherapy can be recommended second-line salvage chemotherapy. The available literature in this regard is weak, although many centers routinely offer this type of second-line salvage chemotherapy to their patients.Patients and MethodsThis retrospective study included transplant-eligible patients with RR-DLBCL treated at Gustave Roussy between January 2008 and April 2020. Eligible patients were those who received second-line salvage chemotherapy using R-DHAP or R-ICE in patients who experienced an insufficient partial response, stable disease, or progressive disease in response to first-line salvage chemoimmunotherapy using an alternative regimen.ResultsForty-six RR-DLBCL patients received second-line salvage regimen, which yielded an objective response rate of 33%, median progression-free survival of 2.1 months, and overall survival of 11.4 months. Twelve patients proceeded to autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT), of whom 70% remained alive 1 year after ASCT. To explore the impact of transplantation, a multivariate analysis (excluding response to the first-line salvage regimen because this covariate was totally embedded within the transplantation covariate), ASCT was associated with progression-free survival (hazard ratio = 0.16; 95% confidence interval, 0.06-0.42) and overall survival (hazard ratio = 0.27; 95% confidence interval, 0.08-0.88).ConclusionSecond-line salvage chemotherapy with R-DHAP or R-ICE followed by ASCT leads to a favorable outcome in almost one third of patients with RR-DLBCL and offers a median overall survival of approximately 1 year. These data support the administration of second-line salvage chemotherapy followed by ASCT.     

Analysis of the Efficacy of Thalidomide Plus Dexamethasone-Based Regimens in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Who Received Prior Chemotherapy,Including Bortezomib and Lenalidomide: KMM-166 Study

BackgroundFor patients with multiple myeloma (MM) that relapsed after treatment with bortezomib- and lenalidomide-based regimens, there were no other treatment options in Korea until 2016. We aimed to determine the efficacy of thalidomide plus dexamethasone-based regimens in patients with relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM).Patients and MethodsWe conducted a multicenter retrospective analysis in Korea for patients with RRMM treated with thalidomide-based regimens who previously received bortezomib and immunomodulatory agents (IMiDs), including thalidomide and lenalidomide.ResultsIn 47 patients with RRMM, the median age was 64 years and the median number of previous treatment lines, including bortezomib and IMiDs, was 3. Primary resistance to bortezomib and lenalidomide was observed in 12 (26%) and 8 (17%) patients, respectively. The most common regimen was a combination of thalidomide, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone. The overall response rate was 38%; 2 patients (4%) experienced a complete response, and 2 patients (4%) experienced a very good partial response. The overall response rate of patients previously exposed to thalidomide was 53%. The median progression-free survival was 5.9 months, and overall survival was 9.2 months. Patients with disease that responded to the thalidomide-based regimen had better progression-free survival compared to those who did not (median, 8.8 vs. 2.5 months; P = .008). The most common adverse events were anemia (51%) for hematologic toxicities and peripheral neuropathy (30%) for nonhematologic toxicities.ConclusionThalidomide-based regimens are potential salvage treatment options for patients with RRMM, even those with disease with prior resistance to IMiDs.     

Pomalidomide,Cyclophosphamide, and Dexamethasone for the Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Real-World Analysis of the Pethema-GEM Experience

IntroductionTreatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) is highly challenging, especially for patients with disease refractory to initial therapy, and in particular for disease developing refractoriness to lenalidomide. Indeed, with currently approved treatments, median progression-free survival (PFS) in the lenalidomide-refractory setting is less than 10 months, reflecting the difficulty in treating this patient population. Pomalidomide is a second-generation immunomodulatory drug that has shown activity in lenalidomide-refractory disease in the setting of different combinations.Patients and MethodsA real-world study was conducted by the Spanish Myeloma group in a cohort of patients with RRMM treated with pomalidomide, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone (PomCiDex). One hundred patients were treated with a median of 3 prior lines of therapy.ResultsOverall response rate was 39%, with a clinical benefit rate of 93%. Median PFS was 7.6 months; median overall survival (OS) was 12.6 months. Median PFS and OS survival were consistent across the different subgroups analyzed. Prolonged PFS and OS were found in patients with responsive disease.ConclusionOur results compared favorably with those obtained with different pomalidomide-based combinations in a similar patient population. PomCiDex remains a manageable, cost-effective, and all-oral triplet combination for RRMM patients.     

Retrospective Review of Outcomes of Multiple Myeloma (MM) Patients With COVID-19 Infection (Two-Center Study)

IntroductionCOVID-19 has profound effects on patients with multiple myeloma (MM) mainly due to underlying immune dysfunction and associated therapies leading to increased susceptibility to infections. The overall risk of morbidity and mortality (M&M) in MM patients due to COVID-19 infection is unclear with various studies suggesting case fatality rate of 22% to 29%. Additionally, most of these studies did not stratify patients by their molecular risk profile.MethodsHere, we aim to investigate the effects of COVID-19 infection with associated risk factors in MM patients and the effectiveness of newly implemented screening and treatment protocols on outcomes. After obtaining institutional review board approvals from each participating institution, we collected data from MM patients diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infection from March 1, 2020, to October 30, 2020, at 2 myeloma centers (Levine Cancer Institute & University of Kansas medical center).ResultsWe identified a total of 162 MM patients who had COVID-19 infection. The majority of patients were males (57%) with a median age of 64 years. Most patients had an associated comorbid condition. Their myeloma disease status and prior autologous stem cell transplant at the time of infection had no impact on hospitalization or mortality. In univariate analysis, chronic kidney disease, hepatic dysfunction, diabetes, and hypertension were associated with an increased risk of hospitalization. In multivariate analysis regarding survival, increased age and lymphopenia were associated with increased COVID-19-related mortality.ConclusionOur study supports the use of infection mitigation measures in all MM patients, and adjustment of treatment pathways in MM patients diagnosed with COVID-19     

KRD-PACE Mobilization for Multiple Myeloma Patients With Significant Residual Disease Before Autologous Stem-Cell Transplantation

BackgroundBortezomib has been incorporated into thalidomide and dexamethasone provided with cisplatin, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide (PACE) as an intensive regimen before autologous stem-cell transplantation for multiple myeloma (MM). We examined MM patients at our center who received chemomobilization with a regimen that substituted carfilzomib and lenalidomide for bortezomib and thalidomide (KRD-PACE).Patients and MethodsThis was a retrospective study of 27 MM patients who received KRD-PACE for chemomobilization. Our analysis included patients who had circulating plasma cells (CPCs) by flow cytometry, ≥ 10% bone marrow plasma cells (BMPC), a monoclonal protein ≥ 1 g/dL, or an involved serum free light chain ≥ 10 mg/dL.ResultsThe most common indication for KRD-PACE was BMPC ≥ 10% in 16 patients (60%), followed by CPCs in 11 (41%). The median (range) age was 61 (35-69) years, and the median (range) BMPC before treatment was 10% (5%-47%). The overall response rate was 43%, and a median (range) of 20.24 (8.08-69.88) × 10⁶ CD34⁺ cells/kg were collected. CPC clearance rate was 50%, and the median reduction in BMPC was 75%. Two patients had sinus bradycardia and 5 (19%) had neutropenic fever.ConclusionKRD-PACE is an effective therapy to mobilize peripheral blood stem cells in MM patients with residual disease burden. This regimen was successful at clearing CPCs and reducing BMPC burden, with an overall response rate of 43%. Despite theoretical concern regarding the combination of 3 cardiotoxic agents, we observed a low frequency of cardiac issues.     

A Noninterventional,Observational, European Post-Authorization Safety Study of Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Treated With Lenalidomide

IntroductionLenalidomide plus dexamethasone is effective and well tolerated in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). In this observational, noninterventional European post-authorization safety study, the safety profile of lenalidomide plus dexamethasone was investigated and compared with that of other agents in the treatment of RRMM in a real-world setting.Patients and MethodsPatients had received ≥ 1 prior antimyeloma therapy; prior lenalidomide was excluded. Treatment was per investigator’s routine practice. Adverse events were analyzed by incidence rates per 100 person-years to account for differences in observation length and treatment duration.ResultsIn total, 2150 patients initiated lenalidomide, and 1479 initiated any other antimyeloma therapy, predominately bortezomib (80.3%), which was primarily administered intravenously (74.3%). The incidence rate of neuropathy was lower with lenalidomide (10.5) than with bortezomib (78.9) or thalidomide (38.7). Lenalidomide also had a lower incidence rate of infections (68.7) versus bortezomib (95.9) and thalidomide (76.0). Conversely, the incidence rate of neutropenia was higher with lenalidomide (38.0) than with bortezomib (18.2) or thalidomide (25.7). The incidence rates of thrombocytopenia were 24.4, 40.4, and 14.4 with lenalidomide, bortezomib, and thalidomide, respectively.ConclusionNo new safety signals for lenalidomide were identified in this study, which is the largest prospective real-world European study of lenalidomide in patients with RRMM to date. These results confirm that the safety profile of lenalidomide plus dexamethasone in RRMM in a real-world setting is comparable to that reported in clinical trials.     

Multiple Myeloma in Hispanics: Incidence,Characteristics, Survival,Results of Discovery,and Validation Using Real-World and Connect MM Registry Data

BackgroundMultiple myeloma (MM) in Hispanics has never been studied. We therefore sought to determine the clinical characteristics and overall survival in MM of Hispanics compared to non-Hispanic whites (NHW) and non-Hispanic blacks (NHB).Patients and MethodsA single-center analysis of 939 patients diagnosed with MM from 2000 to 2017 with a large representation of NHB (n = 489), Hispanics (n = 281), and NHW (n = 169) was conducted to evaluate outcomes and disease characteristics. We used the Connect MM Registry, a large US multicenter prospective observational study with newly diagnosed MM patients, as a validation cohort.ResultsHispanics had a higher incidence of MM compared to NHW. The median age at presentation was 5 years younger (median, 65 years) in Hispanics compared to NHW (median, 70 years), and patients were more likely to present with renal dysfunction (estimated glomerular filtration rate < 30 mL/min). Hispanics had a higher proportion of Revised International Staging System (R-ISS) stage I disease compared to NHW and NHB (P = .03), while there was no difference in cytogenetics between Hispanics and NHB/NHW. In the multivariate analysis, only high-risk disease and response to first-line therapy significantly affected survival.ConclusionIn this first and largest analysis of MM in Hispanics, we found that Hispanics present at a younger age, have a higher incidence of renal dysfunction, and have low R-ISS stage disease at presentation. With equal access to therapy, Hispanics have survival similar to NHW/NHB.     

Outcomes of VD-PACE With Immunomodulatory Agent as a Salvage Therapy for Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

BackgroundAggressive relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) often requires salvage cytotoxic chemotherapy. We evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of VD-PACE (bortezomib, dexamethasone, cisplatin, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, etoposide) with an immunomodulatory agent (IMiD) in RRMM.Patients and MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the effectiveness and tolerability among 30 patients with RRMM receiving ≥ 1 cycle of VD-PACE + IMiD between January 2012 to April 2019.ResultsOf 30 patients, 26 (86%) had myeloma double refractory to protease inhibitors and IMiDs, and had received a median of 3 lines prior of therapy. The overall response rate was 67.7%, 13% patients experienced complete remission or better, and 13% experienced very good partial response. Median progression-free and median overall survival were 11 and 26 months, respectively. The most common grade 3 or higher adverse events were hematologic events, which were manageable.ConclusionVD-PACE + IMiD is an effective and tolerable salvage treatment for RRMM, with an impressive response rate in pretreated RRMM.     

Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics of Patients With Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma and Their influence on Treatment in the Real-World Setting in Spain: The CharisMMa Study

IntroductionTreatment of relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) should be established based on multiple factors, including previous treatment and the sociodemographic/clinical characteristics of the patients. However, patients enrolled in randomized-controlled trials often do not mirror the scenario encountered in real-world practice, thus challenging therapeutic decisions in day-to-day practice.Patients and methodsThis observational, cross-sectional, multicenter study aimed to investigate the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of patients with RRMM treated in routine practice in Spain and their influence on treatment regimens.ResultsThe study included 276 RRMM patients (median age 69 years; no gender predominance). Seventy-four percent of patients had CRAB features at the time of study inclusion, 65.9% bone lesions, 28.7% high-risk cytogenetics, and 27.0% were at ISS stage III; 65.1% were retired and lived in urban areas (75.7%) with their relatives (85.8%); 28.7% had some dependence degree. Patients had experienced their last relapse in a median of 1.61 months before enrollment and had received a median of 2 treatment lines (range 1-10). Second-and third-line therapies were mostly based on immunomodulatory drugs, followed by proteasome inhibitors (PIs), whereas monoclonal antibodies prevailed in later treatment lines. The presence of extramedullary plasmacytomas, the absence of osteopenia, and being in the second or third treatment line (vs. later lines) significantly increased the odds of receiving PIs.ConclusionsRRMM treatment in the real-world setting is highly heterogeneous and is primarily influenced by the number of previous lines. The consideration of patients’ clinical and sociodemographic characteristics may support clinicians in making therapeutic decisions.