Effects of fluticasone propionate in COPD patients with bronchial hyperresponsiveness

BACKGROUND: Treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with inhaled corticosteroids does not appear to be as effective as similar treatment of asthma. It seems that only certain subgroups of patients with COPD benefit from steroid treatment. A study was undertaken to examine whether inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP) had an effect on lung function and on indices of inflammation in a subgroup of COPD patients with bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR). METHODS: Twenty three patients with COPD were studied. Patients had to be persistent current smokers between 40 and 70 years of age. Non-specific BHR was defined as a PC(20) for histamine of 相似文献   

Comparison of fluticasone propionate with beclomethasone dipropionate in moderate to severe asthma treated for one year. International Study Group.

BACKGROUND--High dose inhaled glucocorticosteroids are increasingly used in the management of patients with moderate to severe asthma. Although effective, they may cause systemic side effects. Fluticasone propionate is a topically active inhaled glucocorticosteroid which has few systemic effects at high doses. METHODS--Fluticasone propionate, 1.5 mg per day, was compared with beclomethasone dipropionate at the same dose for one year in patients with symptomatic moderate to severe asthma; 142 patients received fluticasone propionate and 132 received beclomethasone dipropionate. The study was multicentre, double blind and of a parallel design. For the first three months patients attended the clinic every four weeks and completed daily diary cards. For the next nine months they were only seen at three monthly intervals in the clinic. RESULTS--During the first three months diary card peak expiratory flow (PEF) rate and lung function measurements in the clinic showed significantly greater improvement in patients receiving fluticasone propionate (difference in morning PEF 15 l/min (95% CI 6 to 25)), and these differences were apparent at the end of the first week. The improved lung function was maintained throughout the 12 month period and the number of severe exacerbations in patients receiving fluticasone propionate was reduced by 8% compared with those receiving beclomethasone dipropionate. No significant differences between the two groups were observed in morning plasma cortisol levels, urinary free cortisol levels, or response to synthetic ACTH stimulation. In addition, both the rates of withdrawal and of adverse events were low, and there were fewer exacerbations of asthma with fluticasone propionate than beclomethasone dipropionate. CONCLUSIONS--This study shows that fluticasone propionate in a daily dose of 1.5 mg results in a significantly greater increase in PEF and asthma control than the same dose of beclomethasone dipropionate, with no increase in systemic or other side effects.     

Effect of allergen avoidance at high altitude on direct and indirect bronchial hyperresponsiveness and markers of inflammation in children with allergic asthma.

BACKGROUND: Improvement of allergic asthma is seen at high altitude partly because of low concentrations of allergen, especially house dust mite. To investigate the effect of a hypoallergenic environment (Davos, 1560 m) on airways inflammation, the changes in bronchial hyperresponsiveness measured with methacholine and adenosine 5'-monophosphate (AMP), blood eosinophils, eosinophil cationic protein (ECP), and serum IgE were studied. METHODS: In 16 allergic asthmatic children tests were performed on admission and after one month. Medication was kept unchanged during the month of investigation and the patients performed peak expiratory flow (PEF) measurements twice daily. RESULTS: After one month at high altitude a considerable improvement was seen in the provocative concentration of AMP causing a 20% fall in forced expiratory volume in one second (PC20 AMP), but not with methacholine. There was also a reduction in total blood eosinophils and ECP. No change in serum IgE was observed. Peak flow variability decreased. CONCLUSIONS: After one month at high altitude a reduction in airways inflammation occurs. The results indicate that AMP responsiveness is a more accurate marker of disease activity in relation to inflammation in asthma than methacholine. The benefits of allergen avoidance at high altitude have important clinical implications for children with allergic asthma.     

Long-term beclomethasone dipropionate aerosol therapy in juvenile asthma.

Following a short-term clinical trial reported elsewhere, beclomethasone dipropionate aerosol has been given to 15 children with asthma for between 2 1/2 and 3 years except for a short placebo period after the first year. Month-by-month records of wheezing, peak flow rate, and other treatments used are presented for the first 17 months, adrenocortical function tests are reported for the first 2 years, and growth is recorded for 2 1/2-3 years. The short-term clinical benefits of the treatment are confirmed in the longer term, adrenocortical function appears to be unchanged, and growth proceeds along expected lines. The main disadvantage seems to be worsening of eczema and allergic rhinitis in those children who have ceased using corticotrophin or oral steroids for the control of asthma. It is concluded that in the long term beclomethasone dipropionate aerosol provides safe and effective day-to-day control of asthma in children, although occasional recourse to systemic steroid therapy cannot be avoided. Oral candidasis has not been a clinical problem.     

Airway and systemic effects of hydrofluoroalkane fluticasone and beclomethasone in patients with asthma

BACKGROUND: With the transition to hydrofluoroalkane-134a propellants in metered dose inhalers, it is important to consider the efficacy and safety profiles of formulations containing inhaled corticosteroids. We examined the airway and systemic effects of hydrofluoroalkane-134a fluticasone propionate (FLU-HFA) and beclomethasone dipropionate (BEC-HFA) at recommended labelled doses. METHODS: Twenty mild to moderate asthmatics were randomised in crossover fashion to receive 6 weeks of 500 micro g/day followed by 1000 micro g/day FLU-HFA and BEC-HFA. Measurements were made at baseline after placebo run in and washout, and after each randomised treatment. The primary airway outcome for benefit was the dose of methacholine provoking a fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) of 20% or more (methacholine PD(20)) and for systemic adverse effects was overnight urinary cortisol/creatinine (OUCC). RESULTS: For mean responses, both doses of BEC-HFA and FLU-HFA produced significant improvements in PD(20) compared with baseline. The improvement was not significantly greater with 1000 micro g/day FLU-HFA versus BEC-HFA, a 1.69 fold difference (95% CI 0.94 to 3.04). Both doses of BEC-HFA but not FLU-HFA caused significant suppression of OUCC compared with baseline, with significantly (p<0.05) lower values at 1000 micro g/day for BEC-HFA versus FLU-HFA (1.97 fold difference (95% CI 1.28 to 3.02)). CONCLUSION: There was no difference in the airway and systemic effects in patients with mild to moderate asthma between FLU-HFA and BEC-HFA at a dose of 500 micro g/day. At 1000 micro g/day there was increased systemic bioactivity with BEC-HFA compared with FLU-HFA, without any gain in airway efficacy.     

Sustained reduction in bronchial hyperresponsiveness with inhaled fluticasone propionate within three days in mild asthma: time course after onset and cessation of treatment

BACKGROUND: Bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) is characteristic of asthmatic airways, is induced by airway inflammation, and is reduced by inhaled corticosteroids (ICS). The time course for the onset and cessation of the effect of ICS on BHR is unclear. The effect of inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP) on BHR in patients with mild persistent asthma was assessed using time intervals of hours, days and weeks. METHODS: Twenty six asthmatic patients aged 21-59 years were selected for this randomised, double blind, parallel group study. The effect of 250 micro g inhaled FP (MDI) administered twice daily was compared with that of placebo on BHR assessed using a dosimetric histamine challenge method. The dose of histamine inducing a decrease in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) by 15% (PD(15)FEV(1)) was measured before and 6, 12, 24 and 72 hours, and 2, 4 and 6 weeks after starting treatment, and 48 hours, 1 week and 2 weeks after cessation of treatment. Doubling doses of changes in PD(15)FEV(1) were calculated and area under the curve (AUC) statistics were used to summarise the information from individual response curves. RESULTS: The increase in PD(15)FEV(1) from baseline was greater in the FP group than in the placebo group; the difference achieved significance within 72 hours and remained significant until the end of treatment. In the FP group PD(15)FEV(1) was 1.85-2.07 doubling doses above baseline between 72 hours and 6 weeks after starting treatment. BHR increased significantly within 2 weeks after cessation of FP treatment. CONCLUSIONS: A sustained reduction in BHR to histamine in patients with mild asthma was achieved within 3 days of starting treatment with FP at a daily dose of 500 micro g. The effect tapered within 2 weeks of cessation of treatment.     

Clinical dose-response relationship of fluticasone propionate in adults with asthma

BACKGROUND: A study was undertaken to examine the dose-response relation of inhaled fluticasone in adolescents and adults with asthma. METHODS: A meta-analysis was carried out of randomised clinical trials that presented data on at least one outcome measure of asthma and that used at least two doses of fluticasone given twice daily. The main outcome measures were forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), morning peak expiratory flow (amPEF), beta agonist use, and withdrawals due to exacerbations of asthma. RESULTS: Seven studies of 2431 adolescents and adults with moderate to severe asthma met the inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis. Four studies examined a dose of >500 microg/day. For all outcome measures there were no statistically significant differences between a dose of 200 v 500 microg/day, 500 v 1000 microg/day, and 200 v > or =500 microg/day, although the point estimates favoured the higher doses. The mean improvement for FEV1 and amPEF resulting from an increase in dose from 200 to > or =500 microg/day was 0.07 l (95% CI -0.01 to 0.14) and 5.9 l/min (95% CI -3.0 to 15.3), respectively. The odds ratio for withdrawals with 200 microg/day compared with > or =500 microg/day was 1.27 (95% CI 0.78 to 2.07). CONCLUSIONS: In adolescents and adults with asthma, most of the therapeutic benefit of fluticasone is achieved with a total daily dose of 200 microg/day with minimal further clinical benefit achieved with higher doses. This conclusion is qualified by the recognition that there is considerable individual variability in the response to inhaled corticosteroids in asthma, which would suggest that some patients may obtain a greater clinical benefit at higher doses.     

Effect of eight months of inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate and budesonide on carbohydrate metabolism in adults with asthma.

BACKGROUND--The safety of high dose inhaled steroids has been a subject of debate. The efficacy and safety of beclomethasone dipropionate and budesonide inhalations were evaluated by measuring their effects on pulmonary function, on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical axis, and on carbohydrate metabolism in adults with unstable asthma. METHODS--Fifteen adults with unstable asthma and 15 healthy controls were studied. Eight patients were treated with beclomethasone dipropionate in initially high (2 mg/day for five months) and subsequently lower (1 mg/day for three months) doses. Seven patients were treated with budesonide at doses of 1.6 mg/day for five months followed by 0.8 mg/day for three months. Blood glucose and serum insulin were measured in an oral glucose tolerance test and plasma cortisol in an adrenocorticotrophic hormone test. The antiasthmatic effect of treatment was evaluated by measuring peak morning expiratory flow rates and forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1). RESULTS--The FEV1 increased significantly after one month of treatment (medians 88% v 96%, p < 0.01), and nocturnal symptoms disappeared within two weeks of treatment in both groups. At one month, the high dose significantly decreased serum insulin concentrations as calculated from the areas under the incremental two hours curves in the glucose tolerance test. The decrease was 59% for beclomethasone dipropionate (medians 76 v 31 mU/l/h, p < 0.005) and 42% for budesonide (medians 79 v 46 mU/l/h, p < 0.01). The median areas at five and eight months were intermediate for both drugs. No significant differences were found when the five and eight month values were compared either with the baseline or with one month values. The difference between the baseline values of both groups and the respective values in healthy controls was significant (medians 79 v 49 mU/l/h, p < 0.01). The one month values for the patients and control subjects were similar. Paralleling the changes for insulin, the area under the incremental two hour blood glucose curve decreased significantly (medians 1.4 v 0.4 mmol/l/h, p < 0.05) during the first month of treatment. The five and eight month values were intermediate (medians 0.8 and 0.7 mmol/l/h, respectively). These changes were not significant compared with the baseline or the one month areas. Similar changes were seen in both treatment groups. Neither treatment had any significant effect on plasma cortisol in the one hour adrenocorticotrophic hormone test. CONCLUSIONS--In patients stressed by uncontrolled asthma, the antiasthmatic effect of high dose beclomethasone dipropionate and budesonide was accompanied by a significant initial decrease in insulin resistance with a parallel improvement in glucose tolerance. During prolonged treatment a small increase in insulin sensitivity was found. The overall effect of beclomethasone dipropionate and budesonide inhalations on carbohydrate metabolism may be beneficial in patients with uncontrolled asthma.     

Effect of one year treatment with inhaled fluticasone propionate or beclomethasone dipropionate on bone density and bone metabolism: a randomised parallel group study in adult asthmatic subjects

BACKGROUND: There is some concern that prolonged treatment with high doses of inhaled corticosteroids may have a detrimental effect on bone mass. The aim of this one year study was to investigate the effects of low and high doses of fluticasone propionate (FP) (400 microg/day and 750 microg/day) and beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) (800 microg/day and 1500 microg/day) on bone mass and metabolism. METHODS: This was a multicentre, double blind, parallel group study involving 69 mild to moderate asthmatic subjects who were randomised to treatment as follows: 22 to FP400, 21 to BDP800, 13 to FP750, and 13 to BDP1500. Their mean age was 39 years, 67% were men, and all the women were premenopausal. RESULTS: The results of peripheral quantitative computed tomographic (pQCT) measurements (primary variable) showed that, compared with baseline values, there was no loss of trabecular or integral (cortical and trabecular) bone in the distal radius or tibia in any of the patients over the 12 month study period. No consistent pattern emerged from the analysis of changes from baseline in markers of bone formation and resorption after six and 12 months of treatment. CONCLUSION: The results of this study provide reassuring prospective one year data showing that inhaled corticosteroids, in the range of doses used, had no adverse effects on bone mass and metabolism in this group of asthmatic patients.     

Effect of prednisone and beclomethasone dipropionate on airway responsiveness in asthma: a comparative study.

To examine the effect of corticosteroids on bronchial hyperresponsiveness, a randomised, double dummy, single blind crossover study was performed in 18 subjects with chronic asthma, comparing the effect of three weeks' treatment with inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate, 1200 micrograms daily, and oral prednisone 12.5 mg daily. The 12 week study began with a three week run in period of baseline treatment, which was continued unchanged throughout the study, and the two treatment periods were separated by a three week washout period. Patients kept daily Airflometer readings and attended the laboratory every three weeks for spirometry and a histamine inhalation test for determining the provocative dose of histamine causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PD20). The mean FEV1 at the start was 1.9 litres (56% predicted). There was no significant change in PD20 with prednisone treatment, the mean PD20 being 0.56 and 0.59 mumol before and after treatment. There was, however, a significant improvement in PD20 with beclomethasone dipropionate treatment, the geometric mean PD20 being 0.38 and 1.01 mumol before and after treatment (p less than 0.001). There was a small but significant improvement in mean FEV1 after beclomethasone dipropionate treatment--from 1.9 to 2.2 litres--but no change after prednisone. Both medications produced significant and similar improvements in morning and evening Airflometer readings, post-bronchodilator improvement, and diurnal variation. Thus at doses that had similar beneficial effects on lung function beclomethasone dipropionate caused a significant improvement in bronchial hyperresponsiveness whereas prednisone caused no change. The superior topical anti-inflammatory effect of beclomethasone dipropionate may account for the different effects on bronchial hyperresponsiveness.     

Prevalence of bronchial hyperresponsiveness and asthma in a rural adult population.

The prevalence of bronchial hyperresponsiveness in adult populations is not known. To document its prevalence and distribution and to determine the factors associated with it, a random sample of the adult population of Busselton, Western Australia, was studied. Spirometric function, bronchial responsiveness to histamine, and atopic responses to skin prick tests were measured. Respiratory symptoms were determined by questionnaire. Data were obtained from 916 subjects. Of these, 876 underwent a histamine inhalation test and bronchial hyperresponsiveness to histamine (defined as a dose of histamine provoking a 20% fall in FEV1 equal to or less than 3.9 mumol) was found in 10.5%. Another 40 subjects with poor lung function were tested with a bronchodilator and 12 were found to have bronchial hyperresponsiveness (defined as a greater than 15% increase in FEV1), making the total prevalence of bronchial hyperresponsiveness 11.4%. The prevalence of current asthma, defined as bronchial hyperresponsiveness plus symptoms consistent with asthma in the last 12 months, was 5.9%. The distribution of bronchial hyperresponsiveness in the studied population was continuous. There was a significant association between it and respiratory symptoms, atopy, smoking, and abnormal lung function (p less than 0.001 for all associations). There was no association with age, sex, or recent respiratory tract infection.     

Addition of salmeterol versus doubling the dose of fluticasone propionate in patients with mild to moderate asthma

BACKGROUND: The objective of this multicentre, randomised, double blind, parallel group study was to compare the efficacy and safety of the addition of salmeterol with that of doubling the dose of fluticasone propionate in asthmatic patients not controlled by a low or intermediate dose of inhaled corticosteroids. METHODS: After a four week run in period of treatment with fluticasone propionate (100 micrograms twice daily if pre-trial dose was 400-600 micrograms inhaled corticosteroids or 250 micrograms twice daily if pre-trial dose was 800-1200 micrograms inhaled corticosteroids), 274 patients were randomised to treatment for 12 weeks with either salmeterol 50 micrograms twice daily plus the run in dose of fluticasone propionate or twice the run in dose of fluticasone propionate (200 or 500 micrograms twice daily). Outcome measures were daily records of peak expiratory flow (PEF), symptom scores, and clinic lung function. RESULTS: The improvements in both the morning and evening PEF were better in the salmeterol than in the fluticasone propionate group, the mean increase in morning PEF being 19 l/min higher (95% CI 11.0 to 26.1) and in evening PEF being 16 l/min (95% CI 18.4 to 24.0) higher in the salmeterol group. The increase in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) was 0.09 1 greater in the salmeterol group than in the fluticasone propionate group after four weeks of treatment (95% CI 0.01 to 0.18), but not after 12 weeks. Both regimens showed an increase in symptom free days and a reduction in the need for rescue salbutamol both during the day and the night, but these improvements were greater in the salmeterol group. There were no significant differences between the groups in adverse effects or in the number of rescue course of oral corticosteroids. CONCLUSIONS: In this group of patients still symptomatic despite 100 or 250 micrograms fluticasone propionate twice daily, the addition of salmetterol caused a greater improvement in lung function and symptom control than doubling the dose of fluticasone propionate.     

Twice daily versus four times daily treatment with beclomethasone dipropionate in the control of mild childhood asthma.

The effects of controlling childhood asthma of the same daily dose (400 micrograms) of beclomethasone dipropionate, given in two or four equal divided doses from a metered aerosol, were compared in a double blind crossover study. Thirty one children aged 6-14 years completed the study. They had previously been shown to need beclomethasone by showing either symptoms or reduced peak flow when the treatment was withdrawn. They recorded their daytime and night time symptoms on a visual analogue scale and their morning and evening peak expiratory flow (PEF), and recorded their symptomatic use of bronchodilator aerosols. Spirometry was performed at the end of each treatment period. Control of asthma was good on both regimens. There were small differences in both objective and subjective measurements in favour of the four times daily regimen, but none reached statistical significance, apart from patients' assessment of daytime wheeze (p less than 0.05). In particular, the differences in the results of lung function tests were very small. Compliance was better for morning and evening doses. These results suggest that beclomethasone given as 200 micrograms twice daily is effective in controlling mild childhood asthma. It may be preferable to 100 micrograms four times daily because of better compliance and because it is unnecessary to take medication to school.     

Comparative adrenal suppression with inhaled budesonide and fluticasone propionate in adult asthmatic patients.

BACKGROUND: A study was performed to compare the adrenal suppression caused by inhaled fluticasone propionate and budesonide on a microgram equivalent basis, each given by metered dose inhaler to asthmatic patients. METHODS: Twelve asthmatic patients of mean age 29.9 years, with a forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) 92.9% predicted and forced expiratory flow 25-75% (FEF25-75) 69.5% predicted, on less than or equal to 400 micrograms/day inhaled corticosteroid, were studied in a double blind placebo controlled crossover design comparing single doses of inhaled budesonide 400, 1000, 1600, 2000 micrograms and fluticasone propionate 500, 1000, 1500, 2000 micrograms. Doses were administered at 22.00 hours by metered dose inhaler with mouth rinsing and measurements were made in the laboratory 10 hours later. RESULTS: Serum cortisol levels compared with placebo (mean 325.2 nmol/l) were suppressed by fluticasone at doses of 1500 micrograms (211.6 nmol/l) and 2000 micrograms (112.3 nmol/l) and by budesonide at 2000 micrograms (243.4 nmol/l). Fluticasone propionate 2000 micrograms produced lower absolute serum cortisol levels than budesonide 2000 micrograms (95% CI for difference 42.9 to 219.2). The dose ratio (geometric mean) for the relative potency was 2.89 fold (95% CI 1.19 to 7.07). In terms of percentage suppression versus placebo, fluticasone propionate also produced greater effects (means and 95% CI for difference): budesonide 1600 micrograms (16.0) versus fluticasone propionate 1500 micrograms (40.9) (95% CI -0.6 to 50.6), budesonide 2000 micrograms (26.0) versus fluticasone 2000 micrograms (65.2) (95% CI 10.5 to 67.8). Individual serum cortisol levels at the two highest doses showed 15 of 24 patients below the normal limit of the reference range (150 nmol/l) for fluticasone and five of 24 for budesonide. Fluticasone propionate also caused greater ACTH suppression than budesonide (as % versus placebo): budesonide 1600 micrograms (12.0) versus fluticasone propionate 1500 micrograms (31.9) (95% CI 7.6 to 32.1), budesonide 2000 micrograms (13.5) versus fluticasone propionate 2000 micrograms (44.4) (95% CI 13.2 to 48.7). For overnight 10 hour urinary cortisol (nmol/10 hours) there was a difference between the lowest doses of the two drugs: budesonide 400 micrograms (37.2) versus fluticasone propionate 500 micrograms (19.9) (95% CI 6.9 to 27.8). CONCLUSIONS: Like budesonide the systemic bioactivity of fluticasone propionate is mainly due to lung vascular absorption. Fluticasone propionate exhibited at least twofold greater adrenal suppression than budesonide on a microgram equivalent basis in asthmatic patients.     

Comparison of short courses of oral prednisolone and fluticasone propionate in the treatment of adults with acute exacerbations of asthma in primary care.

BACKGROUND: Oral corticosteroids used in short courses for acute asthma are regarded as safe, although the frequent use of these drugs may result in patients suffering from systemic side effects. It has become common practice for patients to increase their own inhaled corticosteroid intake when their asthma goes out of control, but it has never been established whether a high dose of inhaled corticosteroid can be as effective as a short course of oral corticosteroid in the treatment of acute exacerbations. METHODS: A multicentre, randomised, double blind, double dummy, parallel group study was undertaken to determine whether the introduction of a high dose of inhaled fluticasone propionate (2 mg daily) is as effective as a short reducing course of oral prednisolone (starting at 40 mg/day and reducing by 5 mg every other day) in the treatment of acute exacerbations of asthma not considered severe enough for admission to hospital but requiring treatment with oral corticosteroid. RESULTS: Four hundred and thirteen adult asthmatic subjects who presented to their general practitioner with an acute exacerbation of asthma were recruited in 47 general practices in the United Kingdom. Treatment failures, defined as a reduction in peak expiratory flow (PEF) to below 60% of the patient's best/predicted value on two consecutive occasions or persistent symptoms with no improvement on three consecutive days, occurred in 23% of patients who received oral prednisolone and 27% who received inhaled fluticasone propionate (difference in percentage of treatment failures 4.3, 95% CI -4.1 to 12.8, p = 0.31). In each group 48% were classified as treatment successes, defined as a 10% or greater increase in percentage best/predicted morning PEF. Both treatments were equally well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: There is no evidence of a significant difference in efficacy between a reducing dose course of oral prednisolone and high dose inhaled fluticasone propionate in mild exacerbations of asthma which do not require admission to hospital.     

Comparison of inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate 1000 micrograms twice daily and oral prednisone 10 mg once daily in asthmatic patients.

BACKGROUND--Glucocorticosteroids are widely used as drugs of first choice in the treatment of moderate to severe asthma. The effects of inhaled steroids in high doses have been compared with oral prednisone in asthmatic patients in a double blind crossover study. METHODS--The trial consisted of a two week run in period followed by two four week treatment periods separated by a four week washout. During the treatment period patients took either 1000 micrograms beclomethasone dipropionate twice daily and placebo tablets once daily, or 10 mg prednisone daily in one morning dose and placebo inhaler twice daily. The effects of treatment on the provocative dose of histamine producing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20 histamine), peak flow measurements at home, and spirometric measurements in the clinic, as well as on the basal and stimulated plasma cortisol levels were measured. RESULTS--Seventeen patients with asthma completed the study. After four weeks of treatment beclomethasone dipropionate showed a significantly better effect on morning peak expiratory flow rate than prednisone. There was a trend to a greater improvement in the PC20 histamine in patients receiving beclomethasone dipropionate than in those receiving prednisone. There were no significant differences in spirometric values, symptom scores, or basal and stimulated cortisol levels between the treatments. The within treatment analysis showed a significant effect of prednisone on stimulated cortisol levels but not of beclomethasone dipropionate. CONCLUSIONS--Beclomethasone dipropionate 1000 micrograms twice daily has a slightly greater therapeutic effect in this population of asthmatic patients than 10 mg of prednisone once a day with less effect on adrenocortical function.     

Effects of high dose inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate, 750 micrograms and 1500 micrograms twice daily, and 40 mg per day oral prednisolone on lung function, symptoms, and bronchial hyperresponsiveness in patients with non-asthmatic chronic airflow obstruction.

BACKGROUND--The effect of treatment with inhaled corticosteroids in patients with non-asthmatic chronic airflow obstruction is still disputed. Whether any physiological improvements seen are accompanied by changes in bronchial responsiveness and symptoms and quality of life is also still unclear. METHODS--A sequential placebo controlled, blinded parallel group study investigating the effect of three weeks of treatment with inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP), 750 micrograms or 1500 micrograms twice daily, and oral prednisolone, 40 mg per day, was carried out in 105 patients with severe non-asthmatic chronic airflow obstruction (mean age 66 years, mean forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) 1.05 litres [40% predicted], geometric mean PD20 0.52 mumol). End points assessed were FEV1, forced vital capacity (FVC), and peak expiratory flow (PEF), bronchial responsiveness to inhaled histamine, and quality of life as measured by a formal quality of life questionnaire. RESULTS--Both doses of BDP produced equivalent, small, but significant improvements in FEV1 (mean 48 ml), FVC (mean 120 ml), and PEF (mean 12.4 l/min). The addition of oral prednisolone to the treatment regime in two thirds of the patients did not produce any further improvement in these parameters. Inhaled BDP produced a treatment response in individual patients (defined as an improvement in FEV1, FVC, or mean PEF of at least 20% compared with baseline values) more commonly than placebo (34% v 15%). The two doses of BDP were equally effective in this respect and again no further benefit of treatment with oral prednisolone was noted. Treatment with BDP for up to six weeks did not affect bronchial responsiveness to histamine. Small but significant improvements were seen in dyspnoea during daily activities, and the feeling of mastery over the disease. CONCLUSIONS--High dose inhaled BDP is an effective treatment for patients with chronic airflow obstruction not caused by asthma. Both objective and subjective measures show improvement. Unlike asthma, no improvement in bronchial responsiveness was detected after six weeks of treatment.     

Airway inflammation, basement membrane thickening and bronchial hyperresponsiveness in asthma

BACKGROUND: There are few data in asthma relating airway physiology, inflammation and remodelling and the relative effects of inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) treatment on these parameters. A study of the relationships between spirometric indices, airway inflammation, airway remodelling, and bronchial hyperreactivity (BHR) before and after treatment with high dose inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP 750 microg bd) was performed in a group of patients with relatively mild but symptomatic asthma. METHODS: A double blind, randomised, placebo controlled, parallel group study of inhaled FP was performed in 35 asthmatic patients. Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and airway biopsy studies were carried out at baseline and after 3 and 12 months of treatment. Twenty two normal healthy non-asthmatic subjects acted as controls. RESULTS: BAL fluid eosinophils, mast cells, and epithelial cells were significantly higher in asthmatic patients than in controls at baseline (p<0.01). Subepithelial reticular basement membrane (rbm) thickness was variable, but overall was increased in asthmatic patients compared with controls (p<0.01). Multiple regression analysis explained 40% of the variability in BHR, 21% related to rbm thickness, 11% to BAL epithelial cells, and 8% to BAL eosinophils. The longitudinal data corroborated the cross sectional model. Forced expiratory volume in 1 second improved after 3 months of treatment with FP with no further improvement at 12 months. PD(20) improved throughout the study. BAL inflammatory cells decreased following 3 months of treatment with no further improvement at 12 months (p<0.05 v placebo). Rbm thickness decreased in the FP group, but only after 12 months of treatment (mean change -1.9, 95% CI -3 to -0.7 microm; p<0.01 v. baseline, p<0.05 v. placebo). A third of the improvement in BHR with FP was associated with early changes in inflammation, but the more progressive and larger improvement was associated with the later improvement in airway remodelling. CONCLUSION: Physiology, airway inflammation and remodelling in asthma are interrelated and improve with ICS. Changes are not temporally concordant, with prolonged treatment necessary for maximal benefit in remodelling and PD(20). Determining the appropriate dose of inhaled steroids only by reference to symptoms and lung function, as specified in current international guidelines, and even against indices of inflammation may be over simplistic. The results of this study support the need for early and long term intervention with ICS, even in patients with relatively mild asthma.     

Comparison of epidural anesthesia and general anesthesia for patients with bronchial asthma

We prospectively investigated the incidence of asthmatic attacks in 94 patients (1.5%) who were diagnosed as definite asthma. We separated the patients into three groups: epidural anesthesia (n = 10) including combined spinal/epidural anesthesia (n = 7), combined epidural and general anesthesia (n = 23), and general anesthesia (n = 54). General anesthesia was induced with propofol or midazolam and maintained with N2O and O2 with sevoflurane in adults. Patients who underwent epidural anesthesia and combined spinal and epidural anesthesia showed no asthmatic attacks. The incidence of bronchospasm with combined epidural and general anesthesia was 2/23. The incidence of bronchospasm with general anesthesia was 4/54. Bronchoconstriction occurred after tracheal intubation in 5 patients except in one patient, in whom it occurred after induction of anesthesia with midazolam. All episodes of bronchospasm in the operative period were treated successfully. The frequency of bronchospasm did not depend on the severity of asthmatic symptoms or the chronic use of bronchodilators before operation. These findings suggest that tracheal intubation, not the choice of anesthetic, plays an important role in the pathogenesis of bronchospasm.