Type 2 diabetes mellitus and CA 19-9 levels

AIM： To prospectively investigate serum CA 19-9 levels in type 2 diabetic patients in comparison with age and gender-matched control subjects.
METHODS： We recorded duration of diabetes and examined fasting glucose levels, HbAlc levels and serum CA 19-9 levels in 76 type 2 diabetic patients and 76 controls. Abdominal CT was performed in order to eliminate abdominal malignancy in the diabetic and control groups.
RESULTS： The average CA 19-9 level was 46.0 ± 22.4 U/mL for diabetic patients whereas it was 9.97± 7.1 U/mL for the control group （P 〈 0.001 ）. Regression analysis showed a positive correlation between diabetes and CA 19-9 independent from age, gender, glucose level and HbAlc level （t = 8.8, P 〈 001 ）. Two of the diabetic patients were excluded from the study because of abdominal malignancy shown by CT at the initial evaluation. For all patients, abdominal CT showed no pancreatic abnormalities.
CONCLUSION： CA 19-9 is a tumor-associated antigen, which is elevated in pancreatic, upper gastrointestinal tract, ovarian hepatocellular, and colorectal cancers, as well as in inflammatory conditions of the hepatobiliary system, biliary obstruction and in thyroid diseases. Diabetes has been claimed to be a risk factor for pancreatic cancer, which is increasing its incidence and has one of the lowest survival rates of all cancers. CA 19-9 is used in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer but is also a marker of pancreatic tissue damage that might be caused by diabetes. We propose that a higher cutoff value of CA 19-9 should be used in diabetics to differentiate benign and malignant pancreatic disease, and subtle elevations of CA 19-9 in diabetics should be considered as the indication of exocrine pancreatic dysfunction.     

Type 2 diabetes mellitus and CA 19-9 levels

AIM: To prospectively investigate serum CA 19-9 levels in type 2 diabetic patients in comparison with age- and gender-matched control subjects. METHODS: We recorded duration of diabetes and examined fasting glucose levels, HbA1c levels and serum CA 19-9 levels in 76 type 2 diabetic patients and 76 controls. Abdominal CT was performed in order to eliminate abdominal malignancy in the diabetic and control groups. RESULTS: The average CA 19-9 level was 46.0 ± 22.4 U/mL for diabetic patients whereas it was 9.97 ± 7.1 U/mL for the control group (P ＜ 0.001 ). Regression analysis showed a positive correlation between diabetes and CA 19-9 independent from age, gender, glucose level and HbA1c level (t = 8.8, P ＜ 001 ). Two of the diabetic patients were excluded from the study because of abdominal malignancy shown by CT at the initial evaluation. For all patients, abdominal CT showed no pancreatic abnormalities. CONCLUSION: CA 19-9 is a tumor-associated antigen, which is elevated in pancreatic, upper gastrointestinal tract, ovarian hepatocellular, and colorectal cancers, as well as in inflammatory conditions of the hepatobiliary system, biliary obstruction and in thyroid diseases. Diabetes has been claimed to be a risk factor for pancreatic cancer, which is increasing its incidence and has one of the lowest survival rates of all cancers. CA 19-9 is used in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer but is also a marker of pancreatic tissue damage that might be caused by diabetes. We propose that a higher cutoff value of CA 19-9 should be used in diabetics to differentiate benign and malignant pancreatic disease, and subtle elevations of CA 19-9 in diabetics should be considered as the indication of exocrine pancreatic dysfunction.     

Clinical value of seram TAG-72 as a tumor marker for pancreatic carcinoma Comparison with CA 19-9

We evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of the carbohydrate antigen TAG-72 as a tumor marker for pancreatic cancer compared with the serum values of CA 19-9. Forty healthy controls, 58 patients with pancreatic carcinoma, and 45 patients with chronic pancreatitis were studied. In patients with pancreatic cancer, 47/58 (81%) and 26/58 (45%) had raised serum levels of CA 19-9 and TAG-72, respectively; the sensitivity of the tests was not influenced by jaundice. In the chronic pancreatitis patients, both CA 19-9 and TAG-72 were elevated in 2/45 patients (44%). Both tests showed a specificity of 95%. Consequently, the sensitivity of TAG-72 was too low compared with CA 19-9. Moreover, serum TAG-72 could not detect small pancreatic cancers. High levels of both tumor markers were found in advanced stages of cancer. No advantage was found using both CA 19-9 and TAG-72 for improving the detection of pancreatic cancer. TAG-72 serum levels > 10 U/mL are closely related to unresectability of the tumor. Only 4/17 (23 %) of patients with resectable tumor had high TAG-72 levels. Serum TAG-72 expression seems to be more frequent in poorly-differentiated tumors than in well-differentiated cancers (56 vs 30% positivity rate).     

Tumour markers CA 19-9 and CA 50 in digestive tract malignancies.

CA 19-9 and CA 50 are tumour marker tests measuring the same carbohydrate structure, sialosyl-fucosyl-lactotetraose--that is, the sialylated Lewis blood group antigen. In addition, the C50 antibody reacts with sialosyl-lactotetraose, which may be expressed in small amounts in some carcinomas. In this study we compared these tests in sera from patients with benign and malignant digestive tract diseases. The sensitivity of the markers for different cancers was also compared at several specificity levels with patients with benign diseases as reference groups. Both markers showed a high sensitivity for pancreatic cancer (77% for CA 19-9; 69% for CA 50) and biliary cancer (88%). The figures in colorectal cancer were almost as high as those reported for CEA; 16-21% elevated values in Dukes A and B tumours and 44-47% in Dukes C and D tumours. The sensitivity for gastric cancer was 48% for both markers. CA 50 had a higher sensitivity for liver cancer (55%) than CA 19-9 (9%), but the proportion of elevated values in benign liver diseases was also higher (33% versus 15%, respectively). Overall, there was good correlation between the CA 19-9 and CA 50 levels, and the difference in sensitivity and specificity was marginal. In clinical practice the greatest value of CA 19-9 and CA 50 is in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer.     

Novel serum tumor marker, RCASl, in pancreatic diseases

AIM: As tumor markers for pancreatic carcinoma, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 have been used, but the sensitivity and specificity are not enough for the diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma. METHODS: A novel serum tumor marker, RCAS1, was compared with two conventional serum tumor markers, CEA (highly specific for pancreatic cancer) and CA 19-9 (highly sensitive for pancreatic cancer), in 48 patients with pancreatic exocrine tumors. RESULTS: When the diagnosis of benign or malignant conditions was examined by one tumor marker, the sensitivity of RCAS1 alone (55%) was higher than that of CEA alone (27%) and the specificity of RCAS1 alone (92%) was greater than that of CA19-9 alone (78%). When examined by a combination of two markers, the sensitivity of a combination of RCAS1 and CA19-9 (95%) was superior to those of CA19-9 alone (78%), RCAS1 alone (55%, P = 0.002), CEA alone (27%) (P<0.001), RCAS1 and CEA (59%) and CA19-9 and CEA (82%). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that the combination of RCAS1 and CA19-9 is highly sensitive for pancreatic carcinoma.     

Novel serum tumor marker, RCAS1, in pancreatic diseases

AIM: As tumor markers for pancreatic carcinoma, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 have been used, but the sensitivity and specificity are not enough for the diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma. METHODS: A novel serum tumor marker, RCAS1, was compared with two conventional serum tumor markers, CEA (highly specific for pancreatic cancer) and CA 19-9 (highly sensitive for pancreatic cancer), in 48 patients with pancreatic exocrine tumors. RESULTS: When the diagnosis of benign or malignant conditions was examined by one tumor marker, the sensitivity of RCAS1 alone (55%) was higher than that of CEA alone (27%) and the specificity of RCAS1 alone (92%) was greater than that of CA19-9 alone (78%). When examined by a combination of two markers, the sensitivity of a combination of RCAS1 and CA19-9 (95%) was superior to those of CA19-9 alone (78%), RCAS1 alone (55%, P = 0.002), CEA alone (27%) (P<0.001), RCAS1 and CEA (59%) and CA19-9 and CEA (82%). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that the combination of RCAS1 and CA19-9 is highly sensitive for pancreatic carcinoma.     

Comparison of the sensitivity and specificity of the CA19-9 and carcinoembryonic antigen assays in detecting cancer of the pancreas

In this study, we determined the sensitivity and specificity of the new serum assay CA19-9 in detecting adenocarcinoma of the pancreas and compared the results with those of the serum assay to carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA). Thirty-seven patients with biopsy-proven adenocarcinoma (14 patients with resectable disease and 23 patients with unresectable disease) were compared with 157 controls (48 patients with benign pancreatic disease, 34 patients with nonpancreatic sources of abdominal pain, 58 patients with benign jaundice, 7 patients with nonpancreatic malabsorption, and 10 patients with renal failure on dialysis). It was determined that a cutoff of 75 U/ml enhanced the diagnostic efficiency (sensitivity + specificity) of CA19-9 over the manufacturer's recommended cutoff of 37 U/ml. The sensitivity of CA19-9 (greater than 75 U/ml) in detecting cancer was greater than that of CEA (greater than 5 ng/ml) (86.5% vs. 48.4%) (p less than 0.01, McNemar test). The sensitivity of CA19-9 was 78.6% in resectable and 91.3% in unresectable disease. The specificity of CA19-9 was also greater than CEA (92.5% vs. 87.3%), although this difference was not statistically significant. The higher the CA19-9 or CEA level, the greater the specificity of either assay; at CA19-9 levels greater than 600 U/ml and CEA levels greater than 20 ng/ml the specificity is approximately 99%. The combination of an elevated CA19-9 level (greater than 75 U/ml) and an elevated CEA level (greater than 5 ng/ml) also enhanced specificity to 99%. It is concluded that CA19-9 used alone is superior to CEA used alone in detecting cancer of the pancreas and that the combination of mild elevations of both assays improves their specificity. Although the CA19-9 marker can be elevated with other intraabdominal adenocarcinomas (e.g., gastric, biliary, or colonic), CA19-9, together with CEA, will be useful to the clinician in differentiating benign from malignant pancreatic processes and in alerting the clinician to the possible presence of an intraabdominal neoplasm in the proper clinical setting.     

血清CA19-9水平术前评估胰腺癌可切除性的临床价值

目的 评价血清CA19-9水平在胰腺癌术前可切除性评估中的临床价值.方法 测定52例术前影像学提示有手术切除可能性并经手术活检或术后病理确诊的胰腺癌患者术前血清CA19-9水平,以手术能否切除为金标准,绘制CA19-9的受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,并以敏感度和特异度之和最大点即曲线左上方作为相应截断点测CA19-9的敏感度、特异度及阳性、阴性预测值.结果 52例胰腺癌患者中手术切除29例(55.8%),未切除23例(44.2%).手术切除组患者血清CA19-9水平为(159.6±170.9)U/ml,未切除组患者为(944.4±773.4)U/ml;CA19-9的ROC曲线下面积0.918(＞0.9),P＜0.01,95%可信区间0.843～0.992,左上方截断点CA19-9值为353.2 U/ml.以此为标准,敏感度93.1%,特异度78.3%,阳、阴性预测值分别为84.4%和90.0%.结论术前血清CA 19-9水平可作为影像学提示有手术切除可能的胰腺癌患者进一步评估的辅助指标.     

Clinical usefulness of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 as a screening test for pancreatic cancer in an asymptomatic population

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Although the prognosis for pancreatic cancer is generally poor, it is well known that the survival rate for resected pancreatic cancer is much higher than that for more conservative treatment. The importance of early detection is emphasized for resection of pancreatic cancer. Measurement of serum carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 has shown satisfactory sensitivity and predictive value in symptomatic patients, but no available data has been found on healthy asymptomatic subjects. Thus, the authors aimed to determine the clinical usefulness of CA 19-9 as a screening tool for pancreatic cancer in asymptomatic subjects. METHODS: From December 1994 to November 2000, 70 940 asymptomatic persons visiting the Health Promotion Center at the Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea, participated. All subjects underwent abdominal ultrasonography and serum CA 19-9 measurement. The authors analyzed the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of CA 19-9 for detecting pancreatic cancer. Also, those subjects who had a serum CA 19-9 level above the cut-off value were followed up using a serial check of CA 19-9, computed tomography, or endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. RESULTS: The number of subjects with a level of CA 19-9 above the cutoff of 37 U/mL was 1063 (1.5%), including four cases diagnosed with pancreatic cancer. The prevalence of pancreatic cancer over the age of 30 years is 13.66 per 100 000 population in Korea. Therefore, the sensitivity is 100% and the specificity 98.5%. However, the positive predictive value of CA 19-9 for detecting pancreatic cancer is only 0.9% in the asymptomatic population. CONCLUSION: Mass screening for pancreatic cancer using CA 19-9 levels in asymptomatic subjects is ineffective because of a very low positive predictive value, despite its high sensitivity and specificity.     

Evaluation of a serologic marker, CA19-9, in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the utility of the serologic marker CA19-9 in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer in patients suspected of having a pancreatic disorder. DESIGN: Blinded study of frozen pedigreed serum samples collected at time of diagnostic evaluation with follow-up review at a mean of 8 years. SETTING: A general university teaching hospital serving both primary and referral patient populations. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Sera collected prospectively from 1978 to 1980 from 261 patients undergoing imaging studies of the pancreas (ultrasound, computed tomography, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography) for a variety of symptoms were assayed for CA19-9 levels, and the results were compared with earlier determinations of other potential markers for pancreatic cancer. In 54 patients ultimately shown to have pancreatic cancer, the CA19-9 assay showed a sensitivity of 70% with a median value of 349 u/mL (normal less than 70 u/mL) and range, 7.3 to 2,859,964 u/mL, whereas specificity of the marker in this population was 87%. The positive predictive value was 59%, and the negative predictive value was 92%. Results of CA19-9 testing in the small group of patients with definitive staging information showed no difference in sensitivity between patients with local/regional disease (n = 6) and those with distant metastases (n = 14), 50% compared with 71% (P = 0.613). CONCLUSION: CA19-9 was found to be a more sensitive and specific marker of pancreatic cancer than other serologic markers and should be a useful test in the patient with suspected pancreatic disease.     

Determination of CA 19-9 antigen in serum and pancreatic juice for differential diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma from chronic pancreatitis

Serum CA 19-9 levels were measured in 63 patients with ductal pancreatic adenocarcinoma and in 49 patients with chronic pancreatitis. Concentrations were abnormally high (greater than 40 U/ml) in 57 (90%) patients with cancer and only in 5 (10%) patients with chronic pancreatitis. All patients with falsely normal serum values had poorly differentiated carcinomas. Median CA 19-9 concentrations were progressively higher in patients with more advanced cancer. Fifteen of 16 (93%) patients with localized cancer has abnormal serum levels but only 5 (31%) of them had values greater than 120 U/ml, which was the highest score observed in patients with chronic pancreatitis. Pure pancreatic juice was obtained endoscopically from 23 patients with pancreatic cancer and from 20 with chronic pancreatitis. CA 19-9 concentrations in pancreatic juice were significantly higher in patients with cancer than in non-neoplastic patients. All 11 patients with resectable cancer investigated had a ratio of CA 19-9 to secretory protein concentration in pancreatic juice above the range of patients with chronic pancreatitis. We conclude that serum CA 19-9 determination is highly sensitive and specific for the differential diagnosis of pancreatic cancer versus chronic pancreatitis. However, moderately increased values (less than 120 U/ml), as seen in patients with localized pancreatic adenocarcinoma, are not conclusive for malignancy. The measurement of CA 19-9 to total protein ratio in pure pancreatic juice is proposed as an adjunctive, accurate diagnostic marker for early stages of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.     

New-onset type 2 diabetes mellitus – A high-risk group suitable for the screening of pancreatic cancer?

BackgroundType 2 diabetes mellitus is widely considered to be associated with pancreatic cancer.ObjectiveTo determine the incidence of pancreatic cancer in new-onset type 2 diabetic patients by measuring the serum level of CA 19-9 and performing abdominal ultrasonography (US).Patients and methodsConsecutive type 2 diabetic patients in whom diabetes was diagnosed within 36 months were included in this prospective study. Serum CA 19-9 measurement and US were performed in all patients. If any of two was positive, abdominal computer tomography (CT) was carried out. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration or direct surgical referral was performed on patients with CT-identified lesions.ResultsA total of 115 patients were enrolled. CA 19-9 was elevated in 10 patients but pancreatic cancer diagnosed in neither of them. Pancreatic cancer was revealed by morphological means in three patients without elevated CA 19-9 level. The sensitivity, specificity, positive-, negative predictive values and validity were 0%, 90.4%, 0%, 97.9% and 87.9% for CA 19-9, 66.7%, 100%, 100%, 99% and 99% for US, respectively. The value of the Standardized Incidence Ratio for pancreatic cancer in new-onset type-2 diabetic patients was 198.6 (95% CI = 6.25–46.9).ConclusionsThe prevalence of pancreatic cancer in patients with new-onset type-2 diabetes is significantly higher than that in the general population and screening is beneficial for detecting PaC in this patient population. CA 19-9 and US is not reliable screening modality for pancreatic cancer screening in this population.     

Serum level of TSGF, CA242 and CA19-9 in pancreatic cancer

AIM: To establish a method to detect the expression of the tumor specific growth factor TSGF, CA242 and CA19-9 in serum and evaluate their value in diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. METHODS: ELISA and Biochemical colorimetric assay were used to detect the serum content of TSGF, CA242 and CA19-9 in 200 normal cases, 52 pancreatitis patients and 96 pancreatic cancer patients. RESULTS: The positive likelihood ratios of TSGF, CA242 and CA19-9 were 5.4, 12.6 and 6.3, respectively, and their negative likelihood ratios were 0.10, 0.19 and 0.17, respectively. With single tumor marker diagnosed pancreatic cancer, the highest sensitivity and specificity of TSGF were 91.6% and 93.5%. In combined test with 3 markers, when all of them were positive, the sensitivity changed to 77.0% and the specificity and the positive predictive value were 100%. The levels of TSGF and CA242 were significantly higher in the patients with pancreatic cancer of head than those in the patients with pancreatic cancer of body, tail and whole pancreas, but the expression of CA19-9 had no correlation with the positions of the pancreatic cancer. The sensitivity of TSGF, CA242 and CA19-9 was increased with the progress in stages of pancreatic cancer. In stage I, the sensitivity of TSGF was markedly higher than CA242 and CA19-9. CONCLUSION: The combined use of TSGF, CA242 and CA19-9 expressions can elevate the specificity for pancreatic cancer diagnosis. And it shows that it plays an important role to differentiate positions and tissue typing. It is a forepart diagnosis for the pancreatic cancer by combination checking. There is very important correlation between the three markers and the pancreatic cancer.     

肿瘤标志物CA242与CA19-9对胰腺癌的诊断价值

目的:比较血清肿瘤标志物CA242与CA19-9对胰腺癌的诊断价值。方法:1996年4月至1997年6月,北京医院对门诊及住院197例患者进行了血清CA19-9的检测,148例进行了CA242的检测,其中25例为临床明确诊断为胰腺癌,12例为急性胰腺炎,18例为良性阻塞性黄疸。结果显示:胰腺癌患者血清CA19-9和CA242较对照明显增高,其中25例胰腺癌患者有21例CA19-9阳性,检测的灵敏度为84％,特异性为74.4％,有17例CA242阳性,检测的灵敏度为68％,特异性为87.8％。CA242与CA19-9比较,灵敏度无显著差异(0.10相似文献   

Clinical value of serum CA19-9 levels in evaluating resectability of pancreatic carcinoma

AIM： To evaluate the clinical value of serum CA19-9 levels in predicting the respectability of pancreatic carcinoma according to receiver operating characteristic （ROC） curve analysis.
METHODS： Serum CA19-9 levels were measured in 104 patients with pancreatic cancer which were possible to be resected according to the imaging. ROC curve was plotted for the CA19-9 levels. The point closest to the upper left-hand corner of the graph were chosen as the cut-off point. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of CA19-9 at this cut-off point were calculated.
RESULTS： Resectable pancreatic cancer was detected in 58 （55.77%） patients and unresectable pancreatic cancer was detected in 46 （44.23%） patients. The area under the ROC curve was 0.918 and 95% CI was 0.843-0.992. The CA19-9 level was 353.15 U/mL, and the sensitivity and specificity of CA19-9 at this cutoff point were 93.1% and 78.3%, respectively. The positive and negative predictive value was 84.38% and 90%, respectively.
CONCLUSION： Preoperative serum CA19-9 level is a useful marker for further evaluating the resectability of pancreatic cancer. Obviously increased serum levels of CA19-9 （〉 353.15 U/mL） can be regarded as an ancillary parameter for unresectable pancreatic cancer.     

Various tumor markers for small pancreatic cancer with special reference to the present status of pancreatic cancer in Japan and our experience over the past 2 years

Various tumor markers for detection of small pancreatic cancer less than 4.0 cm of diameter were evaluated and our recent 2 year experience is presented. Even in T1 cancer, 62.5% of the patients (N = 24) had elevated serum CA 19-9 and 56.5% of the patients also had elevated serum SPan-1. However, that of other markers was less than 30% except for CA 50 (60%). In T2 cancer, the highest sensitivity was observed for SPan-1 (79.6%, N = 54) and that of Ca 19-9 (N = 54) was also high (77.7%). That of other markers was less than 50%. The combination assay of CA 19-9 and SPan-1 in T1 cancer increased sensitivity from a single assay of 62.5% and 56.5%, respectively, to 70%. In T2 cancer, the sensitivity of the combination was 97.1%. All of our cases showed positive results using serum SPan-1 and/or CA 19-9 before confirming the diagnosis with imaging procedures. By applying measurements accurately, the test is a very useful adjunct to the diagnosis of small pancreatic cancer and therefore improves its prognosis.     

血清TSGF、CA242、CA19-9对老年胰腺癌患者诊断作用的临床研究

目的 评价血清中肿瘤标志物恶性肿瘤相关物质(TSGF)、糖类抗原CA242和CAl9-9对老年胰腺癌患者的诊断作用。方法 采用生化比色法与酶免法分别检测200例健康人、52例胰腺炎及96例胰腺癌患者的TSGF、CA242和CAl9-9含量。结果 TSGF、CA242和CAl9-9阳性似然比依次为5．4、12．6和6．3，阴性似然比依次为0．10、0．19和0．17。单项肿瘤标志物对胰腺癌诊断：TSGF敏感性高达91．6％，CA242特异性高达93．5％。以3项均为阳性诊断胰腺癌：敏感性为77．1％，特异性和阳性预测值皆为100．0％。胰头癌TSGF与CA242水平显著高于胰体癌、胰尾癌及全胰癌，而CAl9-9的表达与其部位无相关性。TSGF、CA242与CAl9-9随着临床分期的进展而敏感性增加，Ⅰ期者TSGF的敏感性显著高于CA242与CAl9-9，因此TSGF可以作为胰腺癌早期筛选的肿瘤标志物。结论 应用TSGF、CA242和CAl9-9联合诊断胰腺癌可以提高特异性，其表达对胰腺癌的不同组织分型起到重要作用，3项标志物联合检测可助早期诊断胰腺癌。     

Comparison of tumor marker CA 242 with CA 19-9 and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Although there are a variety of tumor markers used for diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma, the sensitivity and specificity of those markers have not yet reached an ideal level. The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic value of CA 242 with CA 19-9 and CEA in the patients with pancreatic cancer. METHODOLOGY: Serum CA 242, CA 19-9 and CEA levels were determined in 135 subjects in the following groups: Pancreatic cancer (n = 40), cholangiocellular carcinoma (n = 15), hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 10), cirrhosis (n = 7), chronic active hepatitis (n = 7), choledochal stone (n = 12), chronic pancreatitis (n = 9), acute pancreatitis (n = 6), and healthy controls (n = 29). RESULTS: An elevated serum CA 242 concentration (> 20 U/mL) was found in 30 out of 40 (70%) (mean; 2163 +/- 838 U/mL) patients with pancreas cancer, in 11 out of 15 patients with cholangiocellular carcinoma (93.3%) (mean 916 +/- 529 U/mL), in none of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and healthy controls. Slightly elevated CA 242 concentration was found in 6 out of 41 patients with benign hepatobiliary and pancreatic disease (range 0.4-97.8 U/mL) (1 acute pancreatitis, 2 chronic pancreatitis, 1 cirrhosis, 2 choledochal stone). Mean serum CA 242, CA 19-9 and CEA levels of the pancreas cancer group were significantly higher than those of the other groups except the cholangiocellular carcinoma group. There was no significant difference between the stage of pancreas cancer regarding mean serum CA 242, CA 19-9 and CEA level. There was positive correlation between serum CA 242 and CA 19-9 level. In the pancreas cancer, the sensitivity of CA 242, CA 19-9 and CEA was 75%, 80%, 40%, respectively and the specificity of those markers was 85.5%, 67.5% and 73%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the advantage of CA 242 compared to CA 19-9 is that its specificity is higher than that of CA 19-9 in the diagnosis of pancreas cancer.     

A new strategy for the application of CA19-9 in the differentiation of pancreaticobiliary cancer: analysis using a receiver operating characteristic curve

OBJECTIVE: Clinicians might be misled in interpreting an elevated CA19-9 when differentiating pancreaticobiliary cancer from benign clinical conditions such as acute cholangitis or cholestasis, because in these conditions, the concentration of CA19-9 may also be elevated. The aims of our study were to calculate new individual cutoff values for CA19-9 according to clinical situations using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and to define a new strategy for interpreting CA19-9 in pancreaticobiliary cancer. METHODS: One hundred sixty patients with pancreatic diseases (cancer 90, benign disease 70), 322 patients with biliary tract diseases (biliary cancer 152, benign disease 170), and 20,035 asymptomatic controls were enrolled in the present study. An ROC curve was described by plotting the sensitivity on the y-axis against 1-specificity on the x-axis for each of several cutoff values. RESULTS: The area under the ROC curve was significantly greater for pancreatic cancer than for biliary cancer (p < 0.05). For patients with pancreatic cancer, CA19-9 proved to be useful. At a cutoff value of 37 U/ml, sensitivity and specificity were 76.7% and 87.1%, respectively. For patients with biliary cancer, CA19-9 was not helpful. However, when patients with biliary disease were divided into two groups according to the presence of cholangitis or cholestasis, CA19-9 proved to be more useful for the group without cholangitis or cholestasis than for the group with cholangitis or cholestasis (p < 0.05). In the former group, the sensitivity and specificity of CA19-9 were 77.6% and 83%, respectively, at the cutoff value of 37 U/ml. For the latter group, the sensitivity and specificity of CA19-9 were 74% and 41.5% respectively, whereas the specificity reached 87% at 300 U/ml. CA19-9 in diagnosing pancreatic cancer was useful regardless of accompanying acute pancreatitis or cholestasis. The serum concentration of CA19-9 in asymptomatic individuals was 9.42 +/- 9.95 U/ml. Only 1 of 157 patients with a concentration of CA19-9 above 37 U/ml was found to have gallbladder cancer. The positive and negative predictive values were 0.65% and 0.78%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The use of CA19-9 for the differentiation of pancreaticobiliary cancer should be applied individually, depending on the clinical situation.     

Optimize CA19-9 in detecting pancreatic cancer by Lewis and Secretor genotyping

BackgroundCarbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) is currently the most widely used biomarker for pancreatic cancer. It is well-known that Lewis and Secretor status can affect CA19-9 biosynthesis. This study was performed to optimize CA19-9 in detecting pancreatic cancer using Lewis and Secretor dependent cut-off values.MethodsLewis and Secretor genotypes were determined by Sanger sequencing in a large cohort of subjects (578 cases with pancreatic cancer, 210 cases with benign pancreatic disease, 315 normal subjects). The effectiveness of CA19-9 for detecting pancreatic cancer using Lewis and Secretor group dependent cut-off values was evaluated.ResultsThe Lewis (-), Mixed, and Secretor (-) groups had low, medium, and high CA19-9 biosynthesis, respectively. In Lewis (-) pancreatic cancer (all stages), CA19-9 had a sensitivity of 48.6% and a specificity of 95.9% when 1.8 U/mL was used as the cut-off value. The sensitivity of CA19-9 in detecting all stages of pancreatic cancer improved from 80.1% to 88.0% and the negative predictive value increased from 81.2% to 87.1% without compromising other values when using group dependent cut-off values. The sensitivity of CA19-9 for the detection of stage I, II pancreatic cancer increased from 76.1% to 87.2%.ConclusionsThe value of CA19-9 in detecting pancreatic cancer was optimized by using group dependent cut-off values based on Lewis and Secretor genotypes. CA19-9 can be applied as an early detector of pancreatic cancer using group dependent cut-off values.