Screening for colorectal cancer in Chinese: comparison of fecal occult blood test,flexible sigmoidoscopy,and colonoscopy

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Fecal occult blood testing (FOBT), flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS), and colonoscopy are the most commonly recommended screening tests for colorectal cancer. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy and safety of these 3 screening procedures in a general population of ethnic Chinese. METHODS: Asymptomatic adults older than 50 years were recruited from the general public through health exhibitions. All enrolled subjects were offered FOBT and full colonoscopy under sedation. Advanced colonic lesions (defined as adenoma > or = 10 mm, villous adenoma, adenoma with moderate or severe dysplasia, or invasive cancer) were recorded. Lesions at the distal 40 cm in the left colon and rectum were taken as findings of FS. RESULTS: A total of 505 subjects (56% women; mean age +/- SD, 56.5 +/- 5.4 years) were enrolled, and 476 (94.3%) had a complete colonoscopy. Advanced colonic neoplasms were documented in 63 subjects (12.5%), of which 45 had lesions in the distal colon and 26 in the proximal colon. Among the 385 subjects with a normal distal colon, 14 (3.6%) had advanced lesions in the proximal colon that would be missed by FS alone. The sensitivity and specificity of FOBT for advanced colonic lesions were 14.3% and 79.2% and the sensitivity and specificity of FS were 77.8% and 83.9%, respectively. Combining FOBT with FS would not significantly improve the results of FS alone. Among these 505 subjects who underwent colonoscopy and 148 who underwent polypectomy, there was no perforation and only one occurrence of postpolypectomy bleeding recorded. CONCLUSIONS: Colonoscopy is a safe and accurate method for the screening of colorectal neoplasms in Chinese subjects.     

Patient age and duration of colonoscopy are predictors for adenoma detection in both proximal and distal colon

AIM: To investigate the relation of patient characteristics and procedural parameters to the endoscopic detection rate of colonic adenomas. Further to study,which factors may be capable to predict the localization of adenomatous lesions.METHODS: We used the data base of a prospective randomized colonoscopy study(The Colo Cap trial) to identify patients being diagnosed with colon adenoma. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to reveal predictors for adenoma detection in the entire colon and also with respect to the proximal and distal part. Covariates including age, gender, duration of colonoscopy and comorbidities were defined to determine association between predictors and adenoma detection.RESULTS: Equal numbers of adenomas were detected in the proximal and distal side of the splenic flexure [126(57%) vs 94(43%), P = 0.104]. Simultaneous occurrence of adenomas in both sides of the colon was rare. The appearance of both proximal and distal adenoma was associated with increasing age(P = 0.008 and P = 0.024) and increasing duration of colonoscopy(P < 0.001 and P = 0.001). Male gender was a predictor for adenoma detection in the proximal colon(P = 0.008) but statistical significance was slightly missed with respect to the distal colon(P = 0.089). Alcohol abuse was found to be a predictor for the detection of distal adenoma(P = 0.041). CONCLUSION: Increasing age and longer duration of colonoscopy are factors with a strong impact on adenoma detection both in the proximal and distal colon. Since proximal adenomas occurred in absence of distal adenomas, complete colonoscopy should be performed for screening.     

Distal colonic neoplasms predict proximal neoplasia in average-risk, asymptomatic subjects

Flexible sigmoidoscopy has been recommended as a screening method to reduce the incidence of colorectal cancer in asymptomatic, average-risk subjects through the early detection and removal of polyps. However, the association between distal and proximal colonic neoplasia and, hence, the requirement for colonoscopic follow up of screen-detected distal neoplasms is unclear. Our aims were: (i) to evaluate the risk of having proximal neoplasms in those with distal colonic neoplasms; and (ii) to determine whether the risk was dependent on the number, size, histology or morphology of the distal lesions. We prospectively evaluated asymptomatic subjects in a flexible sigmoidoscopy based screening programme. Those with rectosigmoid neoplasia underwent colonoscopy. The number, size, histology and morphology of the polyps were recorded. Advanced lesions were defined as adenomas > 1 cm or with a villous component or severe dysplasia, carcinoma in situ or cancer. Adenomatous polyps were found in 17% (135) of screening flexible sigmoidoscopies. At colonoscopy, up to 30% of subjects with distal colonic neoplasms had synchronous proximal lesions at colonoscopy and up to 20% had advanced proximal lesions. The risk of proximal colonic neoplasia was increased in those with distal sessile colonic neoplasms but appeared independent of distal lesion size, number or morphology. In conclusion, distal colonic neoplasia predicts proximal neoplasia in up to 30% of subjects and these were advanced lesions in up to 20%. We recommend that all subjects with biopsy proven distal colonic neoplasia undergo colonoscopy.     

Screening for Colorectal Cancer in Average-Risk Chinese Population Using a Mixed Strategy with Sigmoidoscopy and Colonoscopy

Purpose The Chinese population has been shown to have more distal colonic neoplasm and a higher sensitivity of sigmoidoscopic screening strategy for detecting advanced neoplasm compared with Western populations. This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of the mixed screening strategy with sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy in the average-risk Chinese population. Methods Consecutive average-risk adults aged ≥50 years who underwent colonoscopy as part of a health checkup were enrolled. Data were analyzed in a hypothetical graded screening strategy using colonoscopy on patients older than a certain cutoff age or those with distal sentinel polyps. The sensitivity in detecting advanced colonic neoplasm and advanced proximal neoplasm as well as the number of colonoscopies reduced were assessed. Results Of the 2,106 persons eligible for analysis, 1,193 (56.6 percent) were males and 913 (43.4 percent) were females. If the cutoff ages were 55, 60, and 65 years, and adenoma detected in the distal colon was the indication for subsequent colonoscopy, the detection rate for 1) advanced colonic neoplasm in the entire colon would be 94, 93.1, and 83.6 percent, respectively, and 2) advanced proximal neoplasm would be 84.8, 82.6, and 58.7 percent, respectively. The number of colonoscopic procedures could be reduced by 28, 48, and 65 percent if the cutoff ages were 55, 60, and 65 years, respectively. Conclusions The mixed screening strategy using a cutoff age at 60 years and distal adenoma as the sentinel lesion is an effective screening program in the average-risk Chinese population.     

Colon pathology detected after a positive screening flexible sigmoidoscopy: a prospective study in an ethnically diverse cohort

OBJECTIVES: Although the association between distal neoplasia on sigmoidoscopy and proximal colonic pathology on follow-up colonoscopy has been well-described, it is not known if these findings are consistent across ethnic groups. The aim of this study was to evaluate ethnic variations in the prevalence of proximal neoplasia on follow-up colonoscopy after a neoplastic lesion is found on sigmoidoscopy. METHODS: Consecutive asymptomatic patients at average-risk for colorectal cancer who were referred for screening flexible sigmoidoscopy were prospectively enrolled. Colonoscopy was recommended for all patients with a polyp on flexible sigmoidoscopy, regardless of size. Advanced neoplasms were defined as adenomas > or = 10 mm in diameter or any adenoma, regardless of size, with villous histology, high-grade dysplasia, or cancer. RESULTS: Among the 2,207 patients who had sigmoidoscopy, 970 were Caucasian, 765 were African American, 395 were Hispanic, and 77 were Asian. The prevalence of neoplasia in the distal colon was 12.6% in Caucasians, 11.2% in African Americans, 15.9% in Hispanics, and 24.7% in Asians (p = 0.002). Of the 290 patients with neoplastic lesions on sigmoidoscopy, follow-up colonoscopy identified neoplasms in the proximal colon in 63.9% of Caucasians, 59.3% of African Americans, 66.7% of Hispanics, and 26.3% of Asians (p = 0.01). Advanced neoplasms in the proximal colon were highest in African Americans (34.9%) and lowest in Asians (10.5%). CONCLUSIONS: In our study population, Asians demonstrated a higher prevalence of distal colonic neoplasia and a lower prevalence of proximal colonic neoplasia compared to non-Asians. Future studies should explore ethnic variation in colonic neoplasia prevalence and location since ethnic variation could lead to tailored colorectal cancer screening strategies.     

Rectosigmoid findings are not associated with proximal colon cancer： Analysis of 6 196 consecutive cases undergoing total colonoscopy

AIM: To review the risk of proximal colon cancer in patients undergoing colonoscopy. METHODS: We estimated the risk of advanced proximal adenomas and cancers in 6 196 consecutive patients that underwent colonoscopy (mean age 60 years, 65% males, without prior history of colorectal examination). Neoplasms were classified as diminutive adenoma (5 mm or less), small adenoma (6-9 mm), advanced adenoma (10 mm or more, with villous component or high-grade dysplasia) and cancer (invasive adenocarcinoma). The sites of neoplasms were defined as rectosigmoid (rectum and sigmoid colon) and proximal colon (from cecum to descending colon). RESULTS: The trend of the prevalence of advanced proximal adenoma was to increase with severe rectosigmoid findings, while the prevalence of proximal colon cancer did not increase with severe rectosigmoid findings. Among the 157 patients with proximal colon cancer, 74% had no neoplasm in the rectosigmoid colon. Multivariate logistic-regression analysis revealed that age was the main predictor of proximal colon cancer and existence of rectosigmoid adenoma was not a predictor of proximal colon cancer. CONCLUSION: Sigmoidoscopy is inadequate for colorectal cancer screening, especially in older populations.     

Distribution of colon neoplasia in Chinese patients: implications for endoscopic screening strategies

OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to measure the prevalence and distribution of colonic neoplasia in Chinese adults, and to estimate the sensitivity of sigmoidoscopic screening strategies for detecting those with advanced neoplasia. METHODS: Asymptomatic, average-risk Chinese adults aged 50 years or older underwent screening colonoscopy. The prevalence and distribution of colonic neoplasia and advanced neoplasia (defined as an adenoma >or=10 mm or with villous, high-grade dysplastic, or malignant features) were reviewed retrospectively and the outcomes of various sigmoidoscopic screening strategies estimated. RESULTS: Of 1,382 individuals (833 men, 549 women; mean age 58.8 years) included, 243 (18%) had colorectal neoplasia and 72 (5.2%) had advanced neoplasia. Neoplasia prevalence was significantly higher in male and older patients. No significant differences were observed in neoplasia distribution between men and women. Overall, 24 patients had advanced neoplasia in the proximal colon, of whom four had synchronous distal neoplasia. The estimated sensitivity for detecting patients with advanced neoplasia was 72% if we assumed screening sigmoidoscopy was performed, with follow-up colonoscopy for those with distal neoplasia; 165 patients would need to undergo colonoscopy. If, instead, we assumed follow-up colonoscopy was done only for patients with distal advanced neoplasia, the estimated sensitivity would decrease slightly to 71%, but the number of colonoscopies would decrease substantially to 51. CONCLUSION: In average-risk Chinese adults, screening sigmoidoscopy is estimated to detect more than two-thirds of patients with advanced neoplasia. In Chinese societies with limited health-care resources, performing colonoscopy only on patients with distal advanced neoplasia is a screening approach that optimizes the return rate on colonoscopic capacity.     

Risk of Advanced Proximal Adenoma and Cancer According to Rectosigmoid Findings in the Korean Population

Colorectal cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer death in the United States and Europe. Recently, the incidence of colorectal cancer has been increasing remarkably in Korea. To reduce the high incidence, screening of colorectal cancer in asymptomatic individuals has been advocated. Sigmoidoscopy is simpler, faster, and better tolerable than total colonoscopy, but the scope cannot reach the proximal colon segment and, therefore, may miss proximal colon cancer. In the present study, we intended to investigate the prevalence of proximal adenoma and cancer according to the findings in rectosigmoid colon and to find their risk factors. Data were collected retrospectively from 1541 consecutive patients who underwent total colonoscopy at the Department of Gastroenterology, Hanyang University, between October 2003 and December 2004. Neoplasms were classified as diminutive adenoma (≤5 mm), small adenoma (6–9 mm), advanced adenoma (≥10 mm, with villous component or high-grade dysplasia), and cancer. The sites of neoplasms were defined as rectosigmoid (rectum and sigmoid colon) and proximal (from cecum to descending colon) colon. The prevalence of advanced proximal adenoma was associated with severe rectosigmoid findings. On the other hand, the prevalence of proximal colon cancer did not show such a tendency. Among the 131 patients with proximal advanced adenoma, 66% had no neoplasm in the rectosigmoid colon. Moreover, among the 27 patients with proximal cancer, 52% had no neoplasm in the rectosigmoid colon. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that age, gender, and advanced rectosigmoid adenoma were the risk factors of advanced proximal adenoma, but nothing was associated with the risk for proximal colon cancer. Advanced rectosigmoid adenoma may be the predictor of advanced proximal adenoma, especially in old males. However, nothing is related to the risk for proximal colon cancer. Therefore, colonoscopy may be more adequate for colorectal cancer screening than sigmoidoscopy in the Korean population.     

The prevalence rate and anatomic location of colorectal adenoma and cancer detected by colonoscopy in average-risk individuals aged 40-80 years

BACKGROUND: The role of screening colonoscopy for colorectal (CR) neoplasia in average-risk population, remains to be determined. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the prevalence and anatomic location of CR adenoma and carcinoma and the morbidity of colonoscopy in individuals at average risk for CR cancer (CRC). METHODS: A retrospective prevalence study of subjects aged 40-80 yr, with no cancer-related symptoms, personal or family history of CR neoplasia, who underwent a colonoscopy. RESULTS: Enrolled were 1,177 persons; 183 aged 40-49 yr (young), 917 aged 50-75 yr, and 77 aged 76-80 yr (elderly). The prevalence of overall CR neoplasia, advanced neoplasia, and cancer was 20.9%, 6.3%, and 1.1%, respectively. In the 50-75 age group, the prevalence of overall adenoma, advanced neoplasia, and cancer was 21.3%, 6.7%, and 1.2%, respectively. Of the 206 neoplasia cases, 21-43% harbored proximal neoplasia beyond the reach of sigmoidoscopy, without distal lesions. Among the elderly, the prevalence of overall adenoma, advanced neoplasia, and cancer reached 26.0%, 14.3%, and 2.6%, respectively. In the young group, 9.8% had overall neoplasia, 1.1% had advanced adenoma, and none had CRC. Procedure-related morbidity rate was 0.1%, with no perforations, bleedings, or mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Screening colonoscopy in average-risk subjects demonstrated a considerable prevalence of CR neoplasia and proximal lesions beyond the reach of sigmoidoscopy. The morbidity rate was negligible. Primary screening colonoscopy should be considered in health programs for the average-risk population, beginning at the age of 50 yr. The significantly high rate of advanced and proximal neoplasia in the elderly, encourages the inclusion of healthy subjects aged 76-80 yr in future prospective studies.     

Predictive value of diminutive colonic adenoma trial: the PREDICT trial.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Diminutive adenomas (1-9 mm in diameter) are frequently found during colon cancer screening with flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS). This trial assessed the predictive value of these diminutive adenomas for advanced adenomas in the proximal colon. METHODS: In a multicenter, prospective cohort trial, we matched 200 patients with normal FS and 200 patients with diminutive adenomas on FS for age and gender. All patients underwent colonoscopy. The presence of advanced adenomas (adenoma >or= 10 mm in diameter, villous adenoma, adenoma with high grade dysplasia, and colon cancer) and adenomas (any size) was recorded. Before colonoscopy, patients completed questionnaires about risk factors for adenomas. RESULTS: The prevalence of advanced adenomas in the proximal colon was similar in patients with diminutive adenomas and patients with normal FS (6% vs. 5.5%, respectively) (relative risk, 1.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.5-2.6). Diminutive adenomas on FS did not accurately predict advanced adenomas in the proximal colon: sensitivity, 52% (95% CI, 32%-72%); specificity, 50% (95% CI, 49%-51%); positive predictive value, 6% (95% CI, 4%-8%); and negative predictive value, 95% (95% CI, 92%-97%). Male gender (odds ratio, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.01-2.61) was associated with an increased risk of proximal colon adenomas. CONCLUSIONS: Diminutive adenomas on sigmoidoscopy may not accurately predict advanced adenomas in the proximal colon.     

Grading of distal colorectal adenomas as predictors for proximal colonic neoplasia and choice of endoscope in population screening: experience from the Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Prevention study (NORCCAP)

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the utility of easily measured clinical variables at flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) screening that might predict a proximal advanced neoplasm (PAN). METHODS: We studied 1833 subjects with biopsy verified adenomas at FS who subsequently underwent full colonoscopy. RESULTS: A total of 387 (21%) subjects had proximal colonic neoplasms (PCN) and 85 (5%) had PAN. In univariate comparison, the risk of PAN increased more than threefold in the presence of a distal adenoma measuring either > or =10 mm in diameter or containing villous components. Multiplicity of distal adenomas, severe dysplasia, or age > or =60 years increased the risk of PAN more than twofold. In the multivariate model, the presence of a distal adenoma > or =10 mm, villousness, and multiplicity maintained their significance as predictive variables for increased risk of proximal neoplasms, whereas sex and severe dysplasia lost their significance. By recommending colonoscopy only to individuals with multiple (>1) adenomas or any high risk adenoma at FS, we would have reduced the number of colonoscopies by 1209 (66%) but would have missed 32 (38%) participants with PAN and 217 (56%) with PCN. By using a 60 cm endoscope instead of an ordinary colonoscope at FS, nine (2%) participants with advanced neoplasms, including three patients with cancer, would have been missed. CONCLUSION: The present study supports the concept of defining "any adenoma" as a positive FS, qualifying for colonoscopy. We recommend the use of an ordinary colonoscope instead of a 60 cm sigmoidoscope for FS screening examinations.     

Screening colonoscopy in Chinese and Western patients: a comparative study

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare findings on screening colonoscopy in a Chinese cohort versus a concurrent Western cohort. METHODS: Asymptomatic adults aged 40 years or older concurrently underwent screening colonoscopy in two hospitals, one in Taiwan and the other in Seattle. The prevalence and distribution of colonic neoplasia and advanced neoplasia (defined as an adenoma >or=10 mm or with villous, high-grade dysplastic, or malignant features) were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The Taiwan cohort was composed of 1,456 subjects. Colonic neoplasms were found in 214 (14.7%), advanced neoplasms in 58 (4%), and colon cancers in 4 subjects (0.3%). The Seattle cohort was composed of 3,403 subjects. Neoplasms were found in 705 (20.7%), advanced neoplasms in 166 (4.9%), and cancers in 11 subjects (0.3%). Age and male sex were risk factors for neoplasia in both groups. The adjusted risk ratio was 1.30 (95% confidence interval: 1.08-1.57) in Western versus Chinese patients. However, the prevalence of advanced neoplasms was not statistically different between the two cohorts. The Chinese cohort had a higher proportion of distal neoplasia (66.4%vs 52.6%; p= 0.0004). The sensitivity of a sigmoidoscopic screening strategy for detecting advanced neoplasia was higher in Chinese (79.3%) than in Western patients (67.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to Westerners, Chinese patients have a slightly lower prevalence of colon neoplasia (but not advanced neoplasia), more distal distribution of neoplasia, and higher likelihood of concomitant proximal advanced neoplasia and distal neoplasia. Colonoscopy is safe, well-tolerated, and a viable screening option in Chinese patients, but its advantage over sigmoidoscopy as a screening tool may be smaller.     

Anatomic distribution of cancers and colorectal adenomas according to age and sex and relationship between proximal and distal neoplasms in an i-FOBT-positive average-risk Italian screening cohort

Background and aims

Subsite-specific incidence rates of colorectal cancer (CRC) and adenomas may vary considerably by race, sex and age as well as due to different screening strategies. We assessed variations in the anatomical distribution of adenomas according to age and sex in an average-risk screening cohort testing positive at immunological faecal occult blood test (i-FOBT) in northern Italy.

Methods

Data from 2,281 consecutive asymptomatic i-FOBT-positive subjects ageing 50–70 years undergone colonoscopy were reviewed. Size, number, macroscopic and histological features of all adenomas found as well as their proximal or distal location in relation to the splenic flexure were examined. Odds ratios (OR) of proximal neoplasms, according to the presence of distal neoplasms and other selected covariates were assessed by multiple logistic regression analysis.

Results

A total of 2,599 neoplasms were found in 1,396 patients. Of these, 116 (5 %) were colorectal cancers, diagnosed in 106 patients. Out of 2,483 adenomas found, 1,564 (63 %) were sessile, 795 (32 %) were peduncolated and 124 (5 %) were flat-type; 54 % of all adenomas were tubular, 36 % were tubulovillous or villous, and 10 % were serrated adenomas. The majority of neoplasms (66 %) were located in the distal colon. Tumour subsite distribution was consistent in both sexes, whereas significant proximal migration of neoplasms occurred in the older age cohort. Indeed, the rate of proximal neoplasms in patients aged ≥60 years was 37 % as compared with 29 % in those ageing 50–59 years. Male gender (OR 1.84), age of 60 years or older (OR 1.44), having a family history of colorectal neoplasms (OR 1.47) and presence of at least 1 distal advanced adenoma (OR 1.63) were all significant predictors of advanced proximal neoplasms.

Conclusions

A left to right shift of colorectal adenomas with increasing age is evident in northern Italian asymptomatic i-FOBT-positive population. Advanced proximal neoplasms are not uncommon in subjects with or without distal adenomas, especially after 60 years of age. This should be carefully considered when implementing public screening strategies for CRC since the use of flexible sigmoidoscopy as a screening tool, particularly in older age groups, appears to be less effective.     

The yield of colonoscopy in average-risk patients with non-specific colonic symptoms

OBJECTIVES: The need for full colonoscopies in average-risk patients with non-specific colonic symptoms is controversial. We aimed to evaluate: (1) the yield of full colonoscopy; (2) the prevalence of proximal neoplasia in these patients; (3) the yield if any of doing full colonoscopies to diagnose proximal lesions in patients in whom the distal colon was clear; (4) the significance of this yield with respect to age. DESIGN: This is a retrospective analysis to assess the value of open access colonoscopy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients who underwent a colonoscopy in our Endoscopy Unit during January 1996 to December 1999 were assessed (n = 3357). RESULTS: We analysed 945 patients with average risk and non-specific colonic symptoms (significant risk factors excluded). The overall yield of adenomas was 5.8%. The yield of distal adenomas in patients > or= 50 years of age was 8.2% (37 out of 450) versus 0.2% in the 50 years group (one out of 495; = 0.0001). The proximal adenoma yield in > or= 50 year olds was 3.8% (17 out of 495) versus 0.2% in < 50 year olds (one out of 495) (P = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In a cohort of average-risk patients with non-specific colonic symptoms attending an "open access" colonoscopy clinic, the yield for proximal adenomas is small in the < 50 years group. In patients aged < 50 years, distal colonic examination is all that is required, whereas a full colonoscopy may be justified in patients > or = 50 years old.     

Advanced distal colonic lesions as predictors of advanced lesions in the proximal colon

The characteristics of adenomas found during sigmoidoscopy have been suggested to predict synchronous adenomas in the proximal colon. Our aim was to examine whether the presence and characteristics of distal colonic lesions are associated with the presence and characteristics of lesions in the proximal colon. We performed a university hospital based case-control study with 3,268 consecutive subjects who received colonoscopy between January 1992 and December 1995. Subjects who had a history of colonic polyps, inflammatory bowel disease, intestinal resection, or had a contraindication against biopsies were excluded. Number size, and histologic characteristics of polyps in the distal and proximal colon were recorded. Advanced lesions were defined as neoplastic lesions with 1 or more of the following features: 1) > or = 1 cm diameter, and/or 2) villous histology, and/or 3) severe dysplasia or carcinoma, and/or 4) > or = 3 lesions. We found that 439 patients had neoplastic lesions in the distal colon only (61.3% with advanced lesions), 198 patients had lesions in the proximal colon only (55.1% advanced), and 197 had lesions in both the distal colon (74.6% advanced) and the proximal colon (55.8% advanced). Distal lesions were significantly more often advanced in patients with synchronous proximal lesions compared with patients with lesions in the distal colon only (odds ratio: 1.9; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.3-2.8; p < 0.001). The odds ratios for finding any neoplastic lesion in the proximal colon and an advanced proximal lesion, respectively, were 3.7 (2.6-5.3) (p < 0.001) and 2.2 (1.3-3.7) (p < 0.01) when a nonadvanced lesion was found in the distal colon, and 6.8 (5.3-8.7) (p < 0.001) and 6.7 (4.9-9.0) (p < 0.001) when an advanced lesion was found in the distal colon. Logistic regression analysis revealed number of distal polyps and villous histology as independent predictors of advanced lesions in the proximal colon; size and severe dysplasia were not independent predictors. In conclusion, characteristics of neoplastic lesions in the distal colon predict the presence and characteristics of lesions in the proximal colon.     

What does sigmoidoscopy really miss?

The relative effectiveness of flexible sigmoidoscopy compared with colonoscopy to screen for colorectal cancer depends on the magnitude of the association between findings in the proximal and distal colon and the false-negative rate of screening sigmoidoscopy for proximal neoplasia. Lewis et al. performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of screening colonoscopy studies. Published studies through July 31, 2000 of asymptomatic patients undergoing screening colonoscopy were identified from the MEDLINE database. The authors generated pooled estimates of the odds ratio for the association between findings in the distal and proximal colon and the prevalence of isolated proximal adenomatous neoplasia. With the sigmoid–descending colon junction used to identify the beginning of the distal colon, the pooled odds ratio for the association between distal adenomatous polyps and any proximal neoplasia was 2.40 (95% confidence interval [Cl] = 1.42–4.05). Diminutive distal adenomatous polyps were also associated with proximal neoplasia (odds ratio = 2.36; 95% CI = 1.30–4.29). Distal hyperplastic polyps were not associated with proximal neoplasia (odds ratio = 1.44; 95% CI = 0.79–6.62). The prevalence of isolated advanced proximal neoplasia in the three studies was 2%, 3%, and 5%, respectively. When the sigmoid–descending colon junction is used to identify the beginning of the distal colon, this yields a pooled estimate of isolated proximal neoplasia of 16.3% (95% CI = 13.6%–19.1%). Distal adenomatous polyps, including diminutive distal adenomatous polyps, are associated with an increasing prevalence of synchronous proximal neoplasia. From 2% to 5% of patients undergoing screening colonoscopy might have isolated advanced proximal neoplasia.     

Predictors of advanced proximal neoplasia in persons with abnormal screening flexible sigmoidoscopy.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The relationship between distal and proximal colonic findings is uncertain. Thus, there is no consensus on which findings on screening flexible sigmoidoscopy should trigger colonoscopy. METHODS: We analyzed data from the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial to assess the relationship between distal and proximal colonic findings. RESULTS: A total of 8802 subjects had an abnormal baseline sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy follow-up. Subjects with <10-mm single or multiple tubular adenomas had similar risks for advanced proximal neoplasia as subjects with hyperplastic polyps or other benign lesions (3%-5%). Subjects with large (>or=10 mm), villous, or severely dysplastic distal adenomas had similarly elevated risks for advanced proximal neoplasia (11%-12%). Multivariate logistic modeling showed a significantly increased risk for advanced proximal neoplasia associated with the presence of a large tubular (odds ratio [OR], 2.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.0-3.4) or villous distal adenoma (OR, 2.7; 95% CI, 2.1-3.5) but not with the presence of one (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.8-1.3) or multiple (OR, 0.8; 95% CI, 0.5-1.2) <10-mm tubular distal adenomas. CONCLUSIONS: Among subjects with a polypoid lesion on screening flexible sigmoidoscopy, those with small tubular distal adenomas are at similar risk for advanced proximal neoplasia as those without distal adenomas. Subjects with a large, villous, or dysplastic distal adenoma are at increased risk. A strategy that encourages individuals with small tubular adenomas on sigmoidoscopy to undergo follow-up colonoscopy and excludes those with nonadenomatous lesions is of questionable validity, because both groups are at similar risk for advanced proximal neoplasia.     

Screening for colorectal lesions with high-resolution video colonoscopes in a German male average-risk population at 40 to 59 years of age

BACKGROUND: Prevalence data for colorectal neoplastic lesions obtained from screening colonoscopies have recently been reported for a U. S. American and a Polish average-risk population. However, prevalence data for a German average-risk population have not been published. METHODS: From 1998 until 2003 a screening colonoscopy was offered to all male participants of a health assessment program. In a total of 618 volunteers with an average risk for colorectal cancer, polypoid lesions were identified and removed using high-resolution video colonoscopes. The histological features of the lesions were categorised according to those of the most advanced one. An advanced lesion was defined as an adenoma of at least 1 cm in diameter, a polyp with villous histological features or high-grade intraepithelial neoplasms or a cancer. Data were analysed in two groups: age 40 - 49 years (group A) and age 50 - 59 years (group B). RESULTS: In group A (age 40 - 49 years, n = 285), 133 subjects (47 %) had polypoid lesions. Histological findings revealed that 57 subjects (20 %) had non-neoplastic and 76 subjects (27 %) had neoplastic lesions. In nine cases (3.2 %) polyps were classified as advanced lesions with a maximal diameter of 35 mm. In group B (age 50 - 59, n = 333), 183 subjects (55 %) had polypoid lesions. Histological findings revealed that 64 subjects (19 %) had non-neoplastic and 119 subjects (36 %) had neoplastic lesions. Among those, 34 (10.2 %) had advanced lesions with a maximal diameter of 55 mm. In neither group was an invasive cancer detected. The difference in the prevalence of neoplastic lesions between the two age groups was statistically significant (chi (2) = 5.85). An exceptionally high rate of 27 % neoplastic lesions was detected in subjects at 40 to 49 years of age. The rate of detected lesions in the group of older subjects was 36 %. CONCLUSION: By using high-resolution endoscopes we found an unexpectedly large number of neoplastic lesions in the colon even in a relatively young average-risk population. The question whether screening colonoscopy should therefore not only aim at detecting early colorectal cancer but also at identifying and removing precursor adenomas at younger ages clearly deserves further attention.     

Screening asymptomatic patients at high risk for colon cancer with full colonoscopy

To evaluate the reliability of screening only the distal colon in patients at high risk for colonic cancer, the endoscopic findings of 49 completely asymptomatic patients who underwent colonoscopy based solely on a positive family history of colonic cancer (average age, 54.5 years) were reviewed. Polypoid lesions were present in 31 (63.3 percent). Thirty-three polyps in 13 patients were larger than 1 cm, including two invasive cancers. Eleven patients (22.4 percent) had polyps proximal to 40 cm only and would not have been identified on examination of the distal bowel alone. The predictive accuracy of rectosigmoid screening in this population is 78 percent. Initial screening of patients at high risk for colonic cancer should include full colonoscopy. The extent of follow-up examinations is then based on endoscopic findings.