p16INK4a在宫颈液基细胞学辅助筛查中的标记意义

目的 评价p16INK4a在宫颈液基细胞学检查中的标记意义.方法 收集74例宫颈外口和颈管的脱落细胞标本,分别进行液基细胞学检测和p16INK4a免疫细胞化学染色,并应用杂交捕获二代法检测高危人乳头瘤病毒(HR-HPV)感染.结果 74例标本中,细胞学诊断未见癌细胞或癌前病变细胞(阴性)10例,意义不明的不典型鳞状细胞(ASC-US)15例,鳞状上皮内低度病变(LSIL)28例,不除外上皮内高度病变的不典型鳞状细胞(ASC-H)5例,鳞状上皮内高度病变(HSIL)11例,鳞状细胞癌(SCC)5例.各级别病变中,HR-HPV阳性者分别为1、4、3、9、7和5例,p16INK4a免疫细胞化学染色阳性者分别为2、5、3、8、9和5例.随着宫颈病变级别的上升,HR-HPV和p16INK4a免疫细胞化学染色阳性率均增高.结论 p16INK4a免疫细胞化学染色增强了对不典型细胞的区分能力,可以提高宫颈癌筛查的准确性.     

Performance of HPV DNA Testing with Hybrid Capture 2 in Triaging Women with Minor Cervical Cytologic Abnormalities (ASC-US/LSIL) in Northern Thailand

Background: Minor cervical cytologic abnormalities include atypical squamous cells of undeterminedsignificance (ASC-US) and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL). Approximately 10-20% of womenwith minor cytologic abnormalities have histologic high-grade squamous intraepithelial or worse lesions (HSIL+).In Thailand, women with minor cytologic abnormalities have a relatively high risk of cervical cancer, and referralfor colposcopy has been suggested. A triage test is useful in the selection of women at risk for histologic HSIL+ toreduce the colposcopy burden. The aim of this study was to assess the performance of high-risk HPV DNA test intriage of women with minor cytologic abnormalities in northern Thailand. Materials and Methods: All womenwith ASC-US/LSIL cytology who were referred to our colposcopy clinic from October 2010 to February 2014were included. HPV DNA testing was performed using Hybrid Capture 2 (HC2). All patients received colposcopicexamination. Accuracy values of HC2 in predicting the presence of histologic HSIL+ were calculated. Results:There were 238 women in this study (121 ASC-US and 117 LSIL). The HC2 positivity rate was significantlyhigher in the LSIL group than in ASC-US group (74.8% versus 41.0%, p<0.001). Histologic HSIL+ was detectedin 9 women (7.4%) in the ASC-US group and 16 women (13.7%) in the LSIL group (p=0.141). There was nohistologic HSIL+ detected among HC2-negative cases (sensitivity and negative predictive value of 100%). Theperformance of HC2 triage was highest among women aged >50 years with ASC-US cytology. An increase in thecut-off threshold for positive HC2 resulted in a substantial decrease of sensitivity and negative predictive value.Conclusions: HPV DNA testing with HC2 shows very high sensitivity and negative predictive value in triage ofwomen with minor cervical cytologic abnormalities in northern Thailand. An increase of the cut-off thresholdfor HC2 triage is not recommended in this region.     

Combined p16INK4a and human papillomavirus testing improves the prediction of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN II-III) in Thai patients with low-grade cytological abnormalities

Thailand is in the process of developing a national cervical screening program. This study examined p16INK4a staining and HPV prevalence in abnormal cervical samples with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL), to evaluate the efficacy of combined HPV and p16INK4a detection to predict CIN II-III. Totals of 125 ASCUS and 87 LSIL cases were re-evaluated by Pap test and cervical cells of ASCUS and LSIL cases were prepared on slides for p16INK4a detection by immunocytochemistry. HPV genotyping of DNA extracts was performed by GP5+/6+ PCR and reverse line blot hybridization. Histopathologic tests were performed to identify cervical lesion. Total of 212 cases were diagnosed to normal (20), ASCUS (112), LSIL (78) and HSIL (2). HPV was detected in ASCUS (49/112, 43.8%), LSIL (60/78, 76.9%) and HSIL (2/2, 100%) cases. The majority of HPV positive samples typed for high-risk HPV. 55.7% (107/192) of abnormal cases (ASCUS, LSIL and HSIL) were positive p16INK4a. For the 111 HPV DNA positive cases, 34 of 49 (69.4%) ASCUS cases and 49 of 60 (81.7%) LSIL cases were p16INK4a positive. 140 biopsies were taken and histological classified: CIN negative (65 cases), CIN I (56 cases) and CIN II-III (19 cases). HPV DNA detection predicted CIN II-III with sensitivity and specificity of 84% and 49%, whereas p16INK4a staining showed higher sensitivity (89.5%) and specificity (56.2%). The prediction of CIN II-III was significantly better by combination of positive HPV DNA and p16INK4a with 93.8% sensitivity and 59.2% specificity. Detection of HPV DNA combined with p16INK4a in cervical cells can predict CIN II-III and may improve the screening diagnosis of Thai women at risk for CIN II-III or cancer.     

p16INK4a免疫细胞化学检测在筛查宫颈癌中的作用

目的 探讨p16^INK4a免疫细胞化学检测在筛查宫颈癌及其癌前病变中的作用。方法 选择220例宫颈液基细胞学剩余标本,制作液基薄片进行p16^INK4a 免疫细胞化学检测,随访组织活检结果,并与高危人乳头瘤病毒（HR—HPV）DNA检测结果进行对照。结果 p16^INK4a在宫颈细胞学诊断的鳞状细胞癌（SCC）、鳞状上皮内高度病变（HSIL）、鳞状上皮内低度病变（LSIL）、非典型鳞状细胞-小除外上皮内高度病变（ASC—H）和非典型鳞状细胞-不能明确意义（ASC—US）病例的阳性表达率分别为100．0％（7／7）、92．2％（107／116）、24．3％（17／70）、100．0％（14／14）和36．4％（4／11）。150例p16^INK4a阳性者中,111例有组织活检诊断,其中宫颈上皮内瘤变（CIN）2级及以上病变者97例（87．4％）;70例p16^INK4a阴性者中,18例有组织活检诊断,无一例CIN2及以上病变。p16^INK4a在CIN2及以上病变与在CIN1之间的阳性表达率差异有统计学意义（P〈0.01）,而HR-HPV DNA的阳性率在两者之间差异无统计学意义。结论 p16^INK4a在宫颈HSIL及以上病变中高表达,有利于高危病例的筛选。     

p16(INK4a) is a useful marker of human papillomavirus integration allowing risk stratification for cervical malignancies

The present study was conducted to assess utility of p16(INK4a) immunopositivity as a surrogate marker for genomic integration of high-risk human papillomavirus infection (hrHPV). A total of 29 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded cervical low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSILs), 27 high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSILs) and 53 invasive squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs), histologically-diagnosed between 1st January 2006 to 31st December 2008 at the University of Malaya Medical Centre were stained for p16(INK4a) (CINtec Histology Kit (REF 9511, mtm laboratories AG, Heidelberg, Germany). Immunopositvity was defined as diffuse staining of the squamous cell cytoplasm and or nucleus (involving > 75% of the intraepithelial lesions or SCCs). Staining of basal and parabasal layers of intraepithelial lesions was pre-requisite. One (3.4%) LSIL, 24 (88.9%) HSIL and 46 (86.8%) SCC were p16(INK4a) immunopositive. All normal squamous epithelium did not express p16(INK4). p16(INK4a) expression was significantly lower (p<0.05) in LSIL compared with HSIL and SCC with no difference in expression between HSIL and SCC.The increased p16(INK4a) immunopositivity in HSIL and SCC appears in line with the integrated existence of the hrHPV and may provide more insightful information on risk of malignant transformation of cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions than mere hrHPV detection.     

Distribution of human papillomavirus types in ThinPrep Papanicolaou tests classified according to the Bethesda 2001 terminology and correlations with patient age and biopsy outcomes

BACKGROUND: A survey of the distribution of human papillomavirus (HPV) types across the spectrum of cervical cytologic categories defined by the Bethesda 2001 guidelines was conducted with the objective of examining how HPV detection by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis may benefit the management of patients who have abnormal Papanicolaou (Pap) test results. METHODS: DNA samples from women with no intraepithelial lesion or malignancy (NLM) (n = 300 samples); atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) (n = 200 samples); low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) (n = 200 samples); atypical squamous cells, cannot rule out high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (ASC-H) (n = 200 samples); and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) (n = 200 samples) were tested for HPV using a modified general primer (GP)5+/GP6+ PCR assay and dot-blot hybridization with type-specific oligonucleotide probes (PCR assay analytical sensitivity: 1-100 copies of HPV, depending on the HPV type, in a background of 100 ng human DNA). RESULTS: HPV was detected in 27% of NLM samples, in 89.5% of ASC-US samples, in 97.5% of LSIL samples, in 93% of ASC-H samples, and in 96.5% of HSIL samples. Thirty-seven different HPV types were identified in total. One or more of 13 high-risk (HR) HPV types (16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, 59, and 68) were detected in 53% of samples that were diagnosed as ASC-US (59.0% of patients younger than age 30 yrs; 45.5% of patients age 30 yrs and older), in 55.5% of samples that were diagnosed as LSIL (60.0% of patients younger than age 30 yrs; 44.0% of patients age 30 yrs and older), in 80% of samples that were diagnosed as ASC-H, and in 87.5% of samples that were diagnosed as HSIL (P < 0.001). HPV-16 was detected in 17.5% of ASC-US samples, in 15.5% of LSIL samples, in 48.5% of ASC-H samples, and in 49.0% of HSIL samples (P < 0.001). Among abnormal smears, HR HPV was significantly more common in women younger than age 30 years compared with women age 30 years and older (P < 0.002). Follow-up biopsy data were obtained for 359 patients. A "benign" biopsy result was recorded for 47 of 64 women (73.5%) with ASC-US, 30 of 66 women (45.5%) with LSIL, 39 of 87 women (45.0%) with ASC-H, and 26 of 142 women (18.0%) with HSIL and was most common in women age 30 years and older (P < 0.0001). Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) Grade I (CIN-I) was found in 14.0% of women with ASC-US, in 39.5% of women with LSIL, in 8.0% of women with ASC-H, and in 7.0% of women with HSIL. CIN-II was diagnosed in 9.5% of women with ASC-US, in 13.5% of women with LSIL, in 19.5% of women with ASC-H, and in 24.0% of women with HSIL. CIN-III was identified in 2 women (3.0%) with ASC-US, in 1 woman (1.5%) with LSIL, in 24 women (27.5%) with ASC-H, and in 71 women (50.0%) with HSIL. CONCLUSIONS: HR HPV testing by PCR of samples diagnosed according to the Bethesda 2001 guidelines may benefit the management of patients with ASC-US or patients with LSIL, especially among women age 30 years and older, by allowing exclusion from referral for biopsy of women who are negative for HR HPV types. However, the small numbers of women who had CIN-III detected after a diagnosis of ASC-US or LSIL limited the assessment of test sensitivity.     

P16INK4a as an adjunct marker in liquid-based cervical cytology

Cytological screening for cervical cancer is hampered by high false negative rates. Inter-observer reproducibility needs optimizing. The potential of p16(INK4a) as a biomarker for cervical lesions was examined in a study of liquid-based cytology (LBC), HPV DNA testing by MY09/MY11 consensus PCR and type-specific PCRs and p16(INK4a) immunocytochemistry on a series of 291 patients selected from routine screening. Comparison of the number of p16(INK4a) immunoreactive cells/1,000 cells exhibited a significantly higher mean count in HSIL (8.80 +/- 1.13) than other cytological groups. The mean count of LSIL (1.09 +/- 0.18) was significantly higher than that of the negative group (0.82 +/- 0.40). ASC-H and HSIL combined showed a significantly higher mean count (6.46 +/- 1.17) than negative, ASC, ASC-US and LSIL. The mean count of immunoreactive cells/1,000 cells was significantly higher in HPV16 positive samples (3.22 +/- 0.72) than in samples containing infections with types of unknown malignant potential (0.83 +/- 0.26) or HPV negative samples (1.17 +/- 0.41). The mean count in infections with other high-risk HPV types (2.55 +/- 0.52) was significantly higher than that in HPV negative samples. Receiver-operating characteristic curves yielded a test accuracy (area under curve) of 0.76, 0.79, 0.88 and 0.95 for ASCUS, LSIL, ASC-H/HSIL and HSIL, respectively. Thresholds for 95% sensitivity were at 0.005, 0.007, 0.098 and 0.445 immunopositive cells/1,000 cells for ASCUS, LSIL, ASC-H/HSIL and HSIL, respectively. The 95% specificity threshold for the detection of HSIL was at 1.87 immunopositive cells/1,000 cells. P16(INK4a) immunocytochemistry can be used as an adjunct to LBC in cervical screening, because it has a good diagnostic accuracy to discriminate HSIL and ASC-H from other lesions. It could be used as a surrogate marker of high-risk HPV infections.     

P16/Ki-67 Dual Staining in Positive Human Papillomavirus DNA Testing for Predictive Diagnosis of Abnormal Cervical Lesions in Northeastern Thai Women

Objective: Cervical cancer screening can effectively reduce new cervical cancer cases, including in Thailand. The abnormal results are subsequently referred for colposcopy. To avoid unnecessary colposcopy, an efficient triage is still needed for validation. This study aimed to investigate the overall positivity of cytology-based screening, HPV detection, and p16/Ki-67 dual staining and evaluate different triage strategies for predictive diagnosis of abnormal cervical lesions in northeastern Thailand. Methods: Cervical cells were collected from 191 women who came for cervical screening in the gynecological outpatient department during March 2019-February 2020. Pap smear samples were classified into 6 groups including 17 atypical glandular cells (AGC), 21 atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US), 7 atypical squamous cells - cannot exclude HSIL (ASC-H), 26 low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSILs), 19 high-grade SILs (HSILs) and 101 no squamous intraepithelial lesion (noSIL). Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed for HPV DNA detection. HPV genotyping was determined by reverse line blot hybridization. P16/Ki-67 dual staining was performed by using CINtec PLUS Cytology kit. Biopsies from abnormal screening were collected for surgical pathology classification. Results: High-risk HPV (HR-HPV) infection was 2.97%, 29.41%, 38.10%, 57.14%, 46.15% and 84.21% in noSIL, AGC, ASC-US, ASC-H, LSIL and HSIL cytology respectively. P16/ Ki-67 in noSIL, AGC, ASC-US, ASC-H, LSIL and HSIL was 0.99%, 5.88%, 9.52%, 42.86%, 26.92% and 63.16%, respectively (P-value < 0.001). Among p16/Ki-67 positive cases, 96.15% (25/26) were infected with HPV and 84.62% (22/26) were HR-HPV. The overall positivity of each and co-testing between cytology or HPV DNA testing or p16/Ki-67 dual staining was evaluated. In each cervical lesion, primary HPV DNA testing showed the highest sensitivity, but low specificity. The combined all HPV/HR-HPV with p16/Ki-67 detection increased the specificity of abnormal cervical lesions. Conclusion: P16/Ki-67 dual stain cytology in HPV-positive women performs well for diagnosis of abnormal cervical lesions and should be considered for management of HPV-positive women to avoid unnecessary colposcopy referrals.     

Triage options to manage high-risk human papillomavirus-positive women: A population-based cross-sectional study from rural China

Improvement in managing HPV-positive women is urgently needed. Based on a population-based study which included 2112 women aged 49 to 69 from Shanxi, China, we aimed to evaluate the clinical performance of multiple triage strategies based on liquid-based cytology (LBC), p16^INK4a, viral load and partial genotyping, as a single or combined strategy for detecting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2/3 or higher (CIN2+/CIN3+) in women who tested positive by Hybrid Capture 2 (HC2). Among 452 HC2-positive women, the test positivity of LBC (ASC-US+), p16^INK4a, HPV16/18 and HPV16/18/31/33/45 were 39.6%, 38.5%, 18.0% and 40.0%, respectively. Compared to LBC (ASC-US+) triage, a single triage strategies using p16^INK4a or extended genotyping (SureX HPV16/18/31/33/45) achieved comparable sensitivity (relative sensitivity: 1.08, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.93-1.26 and 0.96, 95% CI: 0.76-1.22) and specificity (relative specificity: 1.05, 95% CI: 0.96-1.14 and 1.02, 95% CI: 0.92-1.14) for CIN3+. Viral load triage using a ≥50 RLU/CO cut-point also yielded similar results with LBC (ASC-US+). Among combined triage strategies, HPV16/18 genotyping with reflex p16^INK4a showed higher sensitivity and slightly lower specificity than LBC (ASC-US+) for CIN3+ detection, however, the differences were not statistically significant. Of note, after a negative result by p16^INK4a or LBC among HPV16/18 negative women, the posttest probability of CIN3+ was lower than 1%. Our study suggested that p16^INK4a, extended genotyping and increased viral load cut-point could be promising alternatives to cytology triage. Combined triage algorithms of HPV16/18 with reflex p16^INK4a or cytology, if negative, are associated with the substantial low posttest risk sufficient to release women to next screening round.     

Validation of a novel immunocytochemical assay for topoisomerase II-alpha and minichromosome maintenance protein 2 expression in cervical cytology

BACKGROUND: Cervical cytopathology has limited specificity for the detection of underlying clinically significant lesions in cases with low-grade cytologic abnormalities. The current study evaluated the performance of a novel immunocytochemical test (ProEx C) for topoisomerase II alpha (TOP2A) and minichromosome maintenance protein 2 (MCM2) in normal versus high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) and positive control (SiHa) pooled cytology preparations and in a pilot series of prospectively collected patient specimens. METHODS: TOP2a and MCM2 were detected as markers of aberrant S-phase induction in SurePath cervical cytology specimens by an indirect polymer-based immunoperoxidase method (ProEx C, TriPath Oncology, Burlington, NC). Slides were scored based on specimen adequacy, the presence of nuclear stain in epithelial cells, and the association of nuclear staining with cytologic atypia (>/=atypical squamous cell of undetermined significance [ASC-US] or atypical glandular cells [AGC]). RESULTS: Intense nuclear staining was detected in cytologically abnormal cells but not in most normal squamous and glandular cells. Slides were scored positive in pooled samples in 1 of 40 (2.5%) cases that were negative for intraepithelial neoplasia or malignancy (NIL), in 40 of 40 (100%) SiHa-spiked NIL, and in 40 of 40 (100%) HSILs. There was 100% concordance in test classification of 20 slides between 2 pathologists. Subsequent evaluation of prospectively collected patient specimens was positive for ProEx C in none of 10 NIL (0%), 2 of 10 ASC-US (20%), 5 of 10 low-grade SIL (LSIL) (50%), and in 10 of 10 (100%) HSILs. CONCLUSIONS: The ProEx C test showed almost no variability with regard to scoring and staining reproducibility and was consistently positive in HSIL. Further studies are indicated to evaluate the potential role of ProEx C as a diagnostic adjunct for the triage of ASC-US/LSIL.     

Triage of women with ASCUS and LSIL cytology: use of qualitative assessment of p16INK4a positive cells to identify patients with high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia

BACKGROUND: The identification of a small percentage of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasias (HGCIN) among patients with minor cytological abnormalities (atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance [ASCUS] and/or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions [LSIL] group) is a major problem in cytology-based cervical cancer screening. The authors investigated the efficacy of p16INK4a as a biomarker to identify samples of patients with HGCIN among those with an ASCUS or LSIL result in Papanicolaou cytology. METHODS: Consecutive liquid-based cytology specimens of 137 ASCUS and 88 LSIL results were selected from gynecologists who adopted a triage regimen with biopsy under colposcopy 2 months later, independent of the p16INK4a result. p16INK4a stained slides were prepared and independently read by 2 observers, who used a recently described score to categorize p16INK4a stained squamous cells. The endpoint of the study was detection of a biopsy-confirmed HGCIN. RESULTS: The overall sensitivity and specificity of p16INK4a positive cells with a nuclear score >2 for diagnosis of HGCIN in ASCUS and LSIL cases combined was 96% and 83%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity in the ASCUS group was 95% and 84%, and 100% and 81% in the LSIL group, respectively. Two observers had a high concordance in assessing p16INK4a stained cells (kappa value of 0.841). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggested that the use of p16INK4a as a biomarker combined with nuclear scoring of p16INK4a positive cells in cervical cytology to triage ASCUS and/or LSIL cases allows identification of HGCIN with good sensitivity and specificity.     

Immunoreactivity of p16 in anal cytology specimens: histologic correlation

BACKGROUND: Cytology has been proposed as a potential screening tool in the evaluation of squamous anorectal disease in view of the morphologic similarities between anal and cervical squamous lesions. Previous studies have demonstrated that p16 overexpression correlates with the degree of dysplasia in the uterine cervix with promising results. Due to potential diagnostic pitfalls in anal cytology, p16 overexpression in these specimens was studied. METHODS: Patients with anorectal cytology who underwent follow-up biopsy within 1 year were selected. Forty-three anorectal cytologic specimens from 29 patients were selected. One slide of each case was destained. Avidin-biotin immunocytochemical studies with the monoclonal antibody CINtec p16(INK4a) were performed. The results of the p16 immunostaining were correlated with the histologic findings. RESULTS: Twenty-eight of the 43 cases demonstrated the presence of squamous cells immunoreactive for p16 in cytology specimens. The p16-positive cells were identified in cases of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) (n = 3 cases), high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) (n = 22 cases), and invasive squamous carcinoma (n = 1 case), and in 2 cases with negative follow-up biopsies. No cell immunoreactive for p16 was found in 15 cases (5 benign cases and 10 cases with either LSIL or HSIL). The sensitivity and specificity of p16 immunoreactivity in the detection of anal intraepithelial neoplasia or carcinoma were 72% and 71%, respectively. The positive and negative predictive values were 93% and 33%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of p16 immunoreactivity is a good predictor of dysplasia in anal specimens. However, the sensitivity and specificity of this marker are not high.     

Human papillomavirus testing using hybrid capture II with SurePath collection: initial evaluation and longitudinal data provide clinical validation for this method

BACKGROUND: Testing for human papillomavirus (HPV) is an integral part of equivocal cervical cytology triage. Clinical validation of non-FDA (Food and Drug Administration)-approved methods is therefore important because of the high volume of such tests and the implications for missed high-grade lesions if test performance is not optimal. METHODS: A preinitiation study and 17 months of follow-up data using Hybrid Capture II (HC II) HPV detection with SurePath (SP) sample collection were analyzed. Results of HPV tests on abnormal cytology samples were collected and compared with follow-up results. HPV-positive rates were determined in cases of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL), and follow-up rates of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) were determined in HPV-positive and -negative cases of atypical squamous cells of unknown significance (ASC-US). Rates were compared with published data using FDA-validated methods. RESULTS: The preinitiation study showed the test method to be 100% sensitive for the detection of LSIL (20 cases) and HSIL (8). The ASC-US follow-up study (2319 cases with 625 having biopsy results) showed that the rate of CIN III+ in HPV +/- cases was 7.8%/1.4%, and of CIN II+ was 17.5%/4.3%, respectively. The positive predictive values/negative predictive values (PPV/NPVs) (CIN II+) for the test were 17.5%/95.7%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Published FDA-validated HPV testing follow-up data show that the expected rates of CIN III+ and CIN II+ in the HPV-negative ASC-US population are 1.4% and 5%, respectively, with PPV/NPVs (CIN II+) of 20%/99%, respectively. By comparison, the present data using HC II with SP show strong similarity, indicating clinical validity for the use of this method.     

p16INK4a immunocytochemistry versus human papillomavirus testing for triage of women with minor cytologic abnormalities

The best method for identifying women who have minor cervical lesions that require diagnostic workup remains unclear. The authors of this report performed a meta‐analysis to assess the accuracy of cyclin‐dependent kinase inhibitor 2A (p16^INK4a) immunocytochemistry compared with high‐risk human papillomavirus DNA testing with Hybrid Capture 2 (HC2) to detect grade 2 or greater cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2+) and CIN3+ among women who had cervical cytology indicating atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC‐US) or low‐grade cervical lesions (LSIL). A literature search was performed in 3 electronic databases to identify studies that were eligible for this meta‐analysis. Seventeen studies were included in the meta‐analysis. The pooled sensitivity of p16^INK4a to detect CIN2+ was 83.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 76.8%‐88.2%) and 83.8% (95% CI, 73.5%‐90.6%) in ASC‐US and LSIL cervical cytology, respectively, and the pooled specificities were 71% (95% CI, 65%‐76.4%) and 65.7% (95% CI, 54.2%‐75.6%), respectively. Eight studies provided both HC2 and p16^INK4a triage data. p16^INK4a and HC2 had similar sensitivity, and p16^INK4a has significantly higher specificity in the triage of women with ASC‐US (relative sensitivity, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.89‐1.01]; relative specificity, 1.82 [95% CI, 1.57‐2.12]). In the triage of LSIL, p16^INK4a had significantly lower sensitivity but higher specificity compared with HC2 (relative sensitivity, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.81‐0.94]; relative specificity, 2.74 [95% CI, 1.99‐3.76]). The published literature indicated the improved accuracy of p16^INK4a compared with HC2 testing in the triage of women with ASC‐US. In LSIL triage, p16^INK4a was more specific but less sensitive. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol) 2012. © 2012 American Cancer Society.     

Application of HPV DNA Testing in Follow-up after Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedures in Northern Thailand

Background: HPV DNA testing has been recently introduced as an adjunct test to cytology in the follow-up ofpatients after treatment for cervical lesions using the loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP). The aim ofthis study was to evaluate the role of HPV testing in the detection of persistent or recurrent disease after LEEP inpatients with cervical epithelial lesions in northern Thailand. Materials and Methods: Patients who underwentLEEP as a treatment for histological low-grade (LSIL) or high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL)or worse at Chiang Mai University Hospital between June 2010 and May 2012 were included. Follow-ups werescheduled at 6-month intervals and continued for 2 years using co-testing (liquid-based cytology and HybridCapture 2 [HC2]) at 6 months and 24 months and liquid-based cytology alone at 12 and 18 months. Results: Of98 patients included, the histological diagnoses for LEEP included LSIL in 16 patients, and HSIL or worse in82 patients. The LEEP margin status was negative in 84 patients (85.7%). At follow-up, 10 patients (10.2%) hadpersistent/recurrent lesions; 4 among LSIL patients (25.0%) and 6 in the group with HSIL or worse (7.3%). Only2 of 82 patients (2.4%) with HSIL or worse diagnoses had histological HSIL in the persistent/recurrent lesions.Using histologically confirmed LSIL as the threshold for the detection of persistent/recurrent disease, cytology hada higher sensitivity than HC2 (90.0% versus 70.0%). At the 6-month follow-up appointment, combined cytologyand HC2 (co-testing) had a higher sensitivity in predicting persistent/recurrent disease (80.0%) compared withthat of cytology alone (70.0%) and HC2 (50.0%). Conclusions: After LEEP with a negative surgical margin, therate of persistent/recurrent lesions is low. The addition of HPV testing at the 6-month visit to the usual cytologyschedule may be an effective approach in the follow-up after LEEP.     

Comparison of p16INK4a Immunocytochemistry with the HPV Polymerase Chain Reaction in Predicting High Grade Cervical Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions

Aim: To compare p16INK4a immunocytochemistry with the HPV polymerase chain reaction in predictinghigh grade cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions. Materials and Methods: This diagnostic case-control studywas conducted from January 2010 until December 2010. We obtained 30 samples, classified according to thedegree of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN): 11 samples for CIN 1, 9 samples for CIN 2, and 10 samples forCIN 3. HPV PCR, p16INK4a immunocytochemistry, and histopathological examination were performed on allsamples. Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS 20.0. Results: In predicting CIN 2-3, we found p16INK4ato have similar specificity and positive predictive value as HPV PCR (95%, 97.2% vs 96.7%), but better sensitivity(87.5% vs 72.5%) and negative predictive value (82.1% vs 67.6%). The most prevalent types of high-risk HPVin our study were HPV 33, 35, 58, 52, and 16. Conclusions: p16INK4a has better diagnostic values than HPVPCR and may be incorporated in the triage of ASCUS and LSIL to replace HPV PCR. Genotype distribution ofHPV differs in each region, providing a challenge to develop HPV vaccines based on the epidemiology of HPVin that particular region.     

p16、Ki-67在宫颈鳞状上皮病变分级诊断中的意义

目的:探讨p16、Ki-67联合应用在宫颈鳞状上皮病变分级诊断中的意义.方法:采用免疫组化方法检测117例宫颈各类病变活检组织中p16、Ki-67蛋白表达情况,并对该组患者液基薄层细胞学(TCT)、高危型人乳头瘤病毒基因检测(HPV-DNA)结果进行比较.结果:根据HE组织学形态,结合免疫组化染色结果修订原有诊断,其中LSIL、HSIL的构成比差异有统计学意义.p16在LSIL、HSIL中的阳性表达率分别为0.00%、97.30%,Ki-67则分别为21.57%、67.58%(P<0.05).TCT和HPV-DNA检测HSIL的敏感度89.19%,特异度39.61%.联合应用p16、Ki-67的敏感度46.67%,特异度95.74%.结论:联合免疫组化染色检测p16、Ki-67可作为宫颈鳞状上皮病变分级诊断的重要标记物.联合TCT、HPV-DNA在宫颈癌筛查中有较高的敏感度,但特异度有限,需与p16、Ki-67免疫组化染色相结合.     

Immunocytochemical colocalization of P16(INK4a) and Ki-67 predicts CIN2/3 and AIS/adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND:

Although previous studies have shown that p16^INK4a and Ki‐67 are sensitive and specific markers for high‐grade lesions (≥CIN2) on cervical biopsies, limited information is available regarding the performance of a dual‐staining approach as a diagnostic adjunct in cervical cytology. We evaluated a dual p16^INK4a/Ki‐67 immunocytochemistry (ICC) assay to determine its sensitivity and specificity versus that of high‐risk HPV (HR‐HPV) in a US‐based pilot cytology study.

METHODS:

ThinPrep specimens from 122 cervical cytology specimens encompassing 23 negative (NILM), 20 ASC‐US, 22 LSIL, 17 ASCH, 22 HSIL, and 18 AGC cases were processed for multiplexed ICC staining using a CINtec Plus Kit. Dual‐positive assay results were defined based on the detection of 1 or more epithelial cells that were stained for both p16^INK4a and Ki‐67 without regard to cellular morphology. HR‐HPV testing was performed by multiplex PCR with capillary electrophoresis genotyping.

RESULTS:

Dual staining for p16^INK4a and Ki‐67 was frequently detected in HSIL and AGC but was rarely detected in NILM cases. The HR‐HPV assay showed a sensitivity of 76.2% and a specificity of 55.8% for the detection of clinically significant cervical squamous or endometrial lesions. In contrast, the colocalization of p16^INK4a plus Ki‐67 maintained a high sensitivity of 81.8% and improved specificity to 81.8% for biopsy‐confirmed CIN2/3, endocervical adenocarcinoma, or endometrial adenocarcinoma.

CONCLUSIONS:

Dual staining for p16^INK4a/Ki‐67 immunocytochemistry dramatically increased specificity and maintained high‐level sensitivity for the diagnosis of CIN2/3 or glandular lesions compared with PCR‐based testing for HR‐HPV. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol) 2012. © 2011 American Cancer Society.     

Immunocytochemistry in liquid-based cervical cytology: analysis of clinical use following a cross-sectional study

Cytological screening for cervical cancer is hampered by imperfect sensitivity and low inter-observer reproducibility. Human papillomavirus (HPV) testing lacks specificity as a primary screening method. Studies indicate that immunocytochemical detection of alterations caused by HPV in the host cells can optimise screening. Here, the potential of p16(INK4a) (cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p16) and MIB-1 (Ki-67 proliferation marker) as adjunct molecular markers for cervical lesions was investigated in a prospective, cross-sectional study of 500 samples in the framework of opportunistic screening in Flanders, Belgium. A consecutive series of 200 samples and 100 samples from the cytological categories ASC, LSIL and HSIL were investigated. Surepath samples were interpreted according to the Bethesda 2001 reporting system. HPV testing was done with MY09/MY11 consensus PCR. Immunocytochemistry for p16(INK4a) and MIB-1 was performed with an automated staining protocol. The number of immunoreactive cells/1,000 cervical cells was assessed. There was a higher mean number of p16(INK4A) and MIB-1 immunoreactive cells/1,000 cells in HSIL (4.06 +/- 1.93 and 11.13 +/- 2.83, respectively) compared to other cytological categories. Both markers showed a large spread in counts, for all categories. In cases of HSIL without immunoreactive cells for either marker, low cellularity and long-term storage in water were often the cause of false negativity. This study confirms that positive staining for p16(INK4a) and MIB-1 is highly correlated with presence of high-grade lesions. These markers could be used as adjuncts to increase the sensitivity of cytological screening as well as the specificity of the HPV test. However, clear methodological standards are needed for optimal performance of immunocytochemistry in a clinical setting.     

Significance of the Cytological Signs of Human Papillomavirus Infection in Anal Pap Smears of Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Infected Japanese Men Who Have Sex with Men

Purpose: The incidence of invasive anal cancer (IAC) has been increasing among human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive men who have sex with men (MSM). Although cytological diagnosis is the modality of choice for screening cases of IAC, it is associated with lower sensitivity and specificity. Therefore, the present study aimed to evaluate new cytological signs of human papillomavirus (HPV) infection that may contribute to improving anal cytology. Methods: Anal cytology and HPV testing were performed using SurePath liquid-based cytology on samples obtained from 37 HIV-positive Japanese MSM. Subsequently, a histological biopsy based on high-resolution anoscopy was performed in MSM with abnormal cytological findings indicative of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) +. Also, anal Papanicolaou (Pap) smears were performed to determine cellularity, presence of dysplastic squamous cells, and other cytological signs of HPV infection. Results: Of the 37 MSM who underwent anal cytology, six tested negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy, three cases exhibited ASC-US, 17 exhibited low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL), nine exhibited high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL), and two remained undiagnosed. The anal Pap smears of 28 (96.6%) of the 29 MSM with abnormal cytological findings of ASC-US+ exhibited anal intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN), as revealed by histological biopsy. The median value (minimum–maximum) of the cellularity of anal Pap smears was 12 (0–70.5) nsc/hpf. In 26 MSM with LSIL and HSIL, the median dysplastic squamous cells count was 14 (2–152) dsc/smear and the cytological sign of HPV infection was 11 (2–71) hpv/smear. Of all anal Pap smears that revealed ASC-US+, 96.6% exhibited cytological signs of HPV infection. Compression-positive binucleated cells were the most prevalent among all cytological signs of HPV infection. Conclusion: For anal cytology, instead of considering a small number of dysplastic squamous cells, screening based on cytological signs of HPV infection may be beneficial for improving the diagnosis of AIN.