Welfare and immigration reform and use of prenatal care among women of Mexican ethnicity in San Diego, California

Foreign-born women and, in particular, Hispanic foreign-born women, are less likely to have insurance, are less likely to have insurance that covers prenatal care, and are less likely to utilize prenatal care compared with US-born Hispanic women. Significant concern has been raised regarding the ability of immigrant women to access prenatal care services because of severe restrictions imposed on immigrants eligibility for Medicaid-funded services following the passage in 1996 of the federal Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reform Act (PRWORA) and the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act (IIRAIRA). We conducted an interview-based study of prenatal care utilization with women of Mexican ethnicity and diverse immigration statuses in San Diego County, California. Our findings indicate that, despite increased levels of fear associated with recent immigration and with undocumented status, there were no statistically significant differences across immigration statuses in length of time to receipt of medical care for gynecological events and for prenatal care.     

On the game: women and sex work

Latinos living with HIV residing in the US-Mexico border region frequently seek care on both sides of the border. Given this fact, a border health perspective to understanding barriers to care is imperative to improve patient health outcomes. This qualitative study describes and compares experiences and perceptions of Mexican and US HIV care providers regarding barriers to HIV care access for Latino patients living in the US-Mexico border region. In 2010, we conducted in-depth qualitative interviews with HIV care providers in Tijuana (n = 10) and San Diego (n = 9). We identified important similarities and differences between Mexican and US healthcare provider perspectives on HIV care access and barriers to service utilisation. Similarities included the fact that HIV-positive Latino patients struggle with access to ART medication, mental health illness, substance abuse and HIV-related stigma. Differences included Mexican provider perceptions of medication shortages and US providers feeling that insurance gaps influenced medication access. Differences and similarities have important implications for cross-border efforts to coordinate health services for patients who seek care in both countries.     

Health insurance coverage-enrollment and adequacy of prenatal care utilization.

Most studies have concluded that good prenatal care plays an essential role in improving birth outcomes, and numerous reports have documented barriers to adequate prenatal care. The relationship between health care insurance eligibility and enrollment procedures and adequacy of prenatal care, however, has not been suitably investigated. This study used data from a statewide representative sample of recently delivered women in South Carolina to assess (1) patterns of health care insurance source and (2) the independent effects of Medicaid enrollment and application procedures on receipt of prenatal care. Health insurance during pregnancy varied by sociodemographic characteristics. Black women's experiences with Medicaid enrollment and application procedures were associated with less than adequate prenatal care. Programmatic efforts and policies should emphasize further improvement in the systems of health care access and delivery to disadvantaged women.     

Initiation of prenatal care by low-income Hispanic women in Houston.

OBJECTIVE: To understand why many Hispanic women begin prenatal care in the later stages of pregnancy. METHODS: The authors compared the demographic profile, insurance status, and health beliefs--including the perceived benefits of and barriers to initiating prenatal care--of low-income Hispanic women who initiated prenatal care at different times during pregnancy or received no prenatal care. RESULTS: A perception of many barriers to care was associated with later initiation of care and non-use of care. Perceiving more benefits of care for the baby was associated with earlier initiation of care, as was having an eligibility card for hospital district services. Several barriers to care were mentioned by women on open-ended questioning, including long waiting times, embarrassment the physical examination, and lack of transportation. CONCLUSIONS: Recommendations for practice included decreasing the number of visits for women at low risk for poor pregnancy outcomes while increasing the time spent with the provider at each visit, decreasing the number of vaginal examinations for low risk women, increasing the use of midwives, training lay workers to do risk assessment, emphasizing specific messages about benefits to the baby, and increasing general health motivation to seek preventive care through community interventions.     

Factors Associated with Sexual and Reproductive Health Care by Mexican Immigrant Women in New York City: A Mixed Method Study

Limited research has examined barriers to sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services for Mexican immigrant women, especially those living in the eastern United States. This mixed-method study describes SRH care utilization and barriers experienced by female Mexican immigrants living in New York City. One hundred and fifty-one women completed surveys, and twenty-three also participated in focus groups. Usage of SRH care was low apart from prenatal services. The highest barriers included cost, language differences, child care, and poor service quality. After adjusting for insurance status, barriers were associated with receipt of gynecological care from a clinic or private doctor. Greater SRH knowledge was associated with current contraceptive use and a recent PAP test. Women reported that promotoras could increase information about SRH and decrease barriers. Results suggest that in a context where services are geographically available, health care utilization is impacted by lack of knowledge and structural barriers such as language, cost, and child care. Implications for community outreach are discussed.     

Oral health attitudes and practices among a German Mexican Mennonite farmworker community

The oral health needs of migrant farm laborers are greater and more immediate than those of comparable populations. However, little is known about the conditions of oral health care among German-speaking Mexican Mennonites, a distinctive cultural subgroup of migrant farm laborers. The purpose of this study was to examine the oral health practices, perceived oral health status, and barriers to obtaining dental care among a community of Low German-speaking Mexican Mennonites residing in Southwest Kansas. Interviews were conducted with a sample of 25 individuals, with questions addressing access/barriers to care, oral health practices, and perceived oral health status. The most frequently identified barriers to dental care were limited finances, lack of adequate health/dental insurance, and limited awareness of available dental services. Although the majority of participants reported experiencing no problems related to language or scheduling dental appointments, the results also indicated low utilization levels of oral care services. Findings suggest that: (1) this population is at-risk for periodontal disease, (2) culturally appropriate programs are needed for preventive oral care education, (3) community and statewide support may help improve access to affordable oral health care.     

Varieties of health services utilization by underserved Mexican American women

Varieties of health services utilization by medically underserved patients were examined in 250 Mexican American women attending a primary care clinic in San Diego, California. Less than half (48.4 percent) of these medically underserved women had obtained clinical preventive services conforming to recommended guidelines, 34.4 percent reported having obtained an annual physical examination in the past year, and 66.0 percent reported visiting a doctor only when they were sick. Lack of any form of health insurance, including Medi-Cal, was associated with underutilization of primary care services to a greater degree than the other variables examined. However, other factors such as full-time employment, low education, dissatisfaction with primary care delivery, and cultural preference for traditional ethnomedical alternative forms of health care, constitute important barriers to utilization of primary care services. Efforts to provide health care to the medically underserved must take these barriers into consideration if they are to be successful.     

Mexican immigrants and the utilization of U.S. health services: the case of San Diego

This paper examines survey data gathered from 2103 Mexican immigrants living or working in San Diego County, California, in order to explore four fundamental questions concerning the utilization of health services: (a) What type of health services do Mexican immigrants use? (b) When hospitals are used, do they tend to be emergency room services? (c) Do Mexican immigrants use preventive services? (d) To what extent do the utilization patterns of undocumented immigrants differ from their legally-immigrated counterparts? The socioeconomic profile of the sample is characterized through analysis of variables such as sex, age, length of residence in the U.S., occupation and income. Mexican immigrants, particularly the undocumented, are relatively young compared to the non-immigrant population, of short duration in the U.S. and earn low income. In addition, undocumented and legally-immigrated respondents are covered by medical insurance at rates far below the general population. Mexican immigrants, including the undocumented, use a variety of health services. Hospital services are not the primary source of care. However, when undocumented respondents did use hospital services, they were more likely to use emergency room care than their legally-immigrated counterparts, who were more likely to use out-patient services. Finally, undocumented respondents tended to neglect preventive services as evidenced by examination of the use of pre-natal care, general check-ups and dental services.     

Birth weight outcomes in a teenage pregnancy case management project

While many comprehensive health care programs for pregnant adolescents are designed to improve the birth weights of the babies born, few provide statistical evidence that they were able to do so. In this study, information was gathered prospectively on 411 mothers in a Teenage Pregnancy and Parenting Program (TAPP) that coordinated medical, educational, and social services through individual case management and agency-level coordination, information on the mothers, their pregnancy, and services received. The low birth weight rate for TAPP participants was significantly lower than the rate for San Francisco teens prior to the establishment of the program (8.1% versus 12.0% p < 0.05). The mean weights of babies born to teens in TAPP were significantly higher than those in San Francisco after controlling for differences in the race, infant gender, parity, and age (p < 0.0001). Participation in the TAPP program prior to delivery was more strongly associated with better birth weight outcomes than was race, age, parity, or gender. Participation in the TAPP program was associated with significantly better birth weights independent of receiving a minimal number of prenatal medical visits adequate for the gestational age of the baby at birth. Our results provide evidence of better health outcomes for the babies of teens who had case management that included continuous individual counseling and coordination of health, education, psychosocial, and nutrition services.     

Barriers to the utilization of maternal health care in rural Mali

This study used data from the 2001 Demographic and Health Survey and multilevel logistic regression models to examine area- and individual-level barriers to the utilization of maternal health services in rural Mali. The analysis highlights a range of area-level influences on the use made of maternal health services. While the dearth of health facilities was a barrier to receipt of prenatal care in the first trimester, transportation barriers were more important for four or more prenatal visits, and distance barriers for delivery assistance by trained medical personnel and institutional delivery. Women's odds of utilizing maternal health services were strongly influenced by the practices of others in their areas of residence and by living in close proximity to people with secondary or higher education. Household poverty and personal problems were negatively related to all outcomes considered. The results highlight the importance of antenatal care and counseling about pregnancy complications for increasing the likelihood of appropriate delivery care, particularly among women living 15-29 km from a health facility. Area-level factors explained a greater proportion of the variation in delivery care than in prenatal care However, significant area variation in the utilization of maternal health services remained unexplained.     

Barriers to breast cancer screening for low-income Mexican and Dominican women in New York City

The proportion of Mexican and Dominican women has increased rapidly in New York City and in other urban areas, and breast cancer screening rates continue to be lower for Latina women as a whole, but particularly for some nationality sub-groups. The current analysis explored the reasons why Mexican and Dominican women from medically underserved communities in New York City do not seek breast cancer screening. Data were collected through interviews with 298 Mexican and Dominican women aged 40–88 years; the interviews included an open-ended question on the barriers women face in seeking screening. The three most commonly cited barriers were not taking care of oneself (descuido) (52.3%), lack of information (49.3%), and fear (44.6%). Women who had been screened cited fear, pain, or other personal barriers more often, but women who had never had a mammogram cited cost or other logistical barriers. Responses from Dominican and Mexican women were significantly different, with Mexican women more often citing shame or embrarrassment and Dominican women more often citing fear. The dependent variable, barriers to screening, was grouped into major categories. When sociodemographic factors were controlled for, the effect of ethnicity disappeared. Multivariate logistic regression revealed that women with a source of health care were less likely to cite any logistical barriers, but significantly more likely to report only personal barriers (such as fear ordescuido). The analysis indicated that personal barriers were very prevalent in the communities studied. It may not be sufficient merely to increase access to breast cancer screening services for low-income Latinas: even when women have a source of health care, personal barriers may prevent many women from seeking screening. Outreach programs need to be tailored to the target communities as there are significant differences among groups of Latinas. Targeted outreach programs must work in tandem with programs to increase access to ensure that both personal and logistical barriers to screening are addressed.     

Mexican Women Seeking Safe Abortion Services in San Diego,California

Except for in Mexico City, abortion is legally restricted throughout Mexico, and unsafe abortion is prevalent. We surveyed 1,516 women seeking abortions in San Diego, California. Of these, 87 women (5.7%) self-identified as Mexican residents. We performed in-depth interviews with 17 of these women about their experiences seeking abortions in California. The Mexican women interviewed were generally well-educated and lived near the U.S.–Mexican border; most sought care in the United States due to mistrust of services in Mexico, and the desire to access mifepristone, a drug registered in the United States for early medical abortion. Several reported difficulties obtaining health care in Mexico or reentering the United States when they had postabortion complications. Several areas for improvement were identified, including outreach to clinics in Mexico.     

Disparities in reported prenatal care advice from health care providers among women of Mexican origin in California

Poorer birth outcomes have been documented among U.S.-born women of Mexican descent when compared with Mexican immigrant women. Behavioral changes that are associated with acculturation may contribute to these deteriorating outcomes. Prenatal health promotion advice can alter prenatal risk behaviors. The growing diversity of the U.S. population during the 1990s heightens the importance of examining the cultural relevance of current health promotion practices. This study examines disparities in the reported receipt of health behavior advice during pregnancy among U.S.-born women of Mexican origin and Mexican immigrant women in California. Data for the analysis are from the 1994–95 California Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System. The study sample includes 1,423 women of Mexican descent. All participants had a live birth in California between January 1994 and December 1995. Women were interviewed about the prenatal counseling they received related to diet, smoking, and alcohol use. Logistic regression was used to analyze the likelihood of reporting advice after controlling for sociodemographic and health system characteristics. Immigrant women were more likely than the U.S.-born to report receipt of prenatal advice on smoking, alcohol, and diet (OR = 1.83, p < .05) despite evidence of the lower prevalence of related health risks among Mexican-born women. Culturally appropriate prenatal counseling would emphasize the maintenance of traditional protective behaviors among less acculturated foreign-born women, and the prevention or cessation of those risk behaviors among the more acculturated women.     

Barriers to prenatal care in Europe.

BACKGROUND: In Europe, it is sometimes assumed that few barriers to prenatal care exist because extensive programs of health insurance and initiatives to promote participation in prenatal care have been established for many decades. METHODS: A case-control study was performed in ten European countries (Austria, Denmark, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Portugal, Spain, and Sweden). Postpartum interviews were conducted between 1995 and 1996. A total of 1283 women with inadequate prenatal care (i.e., with 0, 1, or 2 prenatal care visits or a first prenatal care visit after 15 completed weeks of pregnancy) and 1280 controls with adequate prenatal care were included in the analysis combining data from the ten countries. RESULTS: Based on combined data of the ten countries, lack of health insurance was found to be an important risk factor for inadequate prenatal care (crude odds ratio [OR] at 95% confidence interval [CI]: 30.1 [20.1-47.1]). Women with inadequate prenatal care were more likely to be aged < 20 years (16.4% vs 4.8%) and with higher parity (number of children previously borne) than controls. They were more likely to be foreign nationals, unmarried, and with an unplanned pregnancy. Women with inadequate care were also more likely to have less education and no regular income. They had more difficulties dealing with health services organization and child care. Cultural and financial barriers were present, but after adjusting for confounders by logistic regression, perceived financial difficulty was not a significant factor for inadequate prenatal care (adjusted OR [95% CI]: 0.7 [0.4-1.3]). CONCLUSIONS: Personal, socioeconomic, organizational, and cultural barriers to prenatal care exist in Europe.     

Health Insurance and the Homeless

There is very little known about health care utilization among the homeless or about the role of health insurance on utilization patterns. Many health care reform proposals advocate expanding health insurance coverage for various segments of society, including the homeless. Although homeless people who lack health insurance face strong financial barriers to health services, providing them with health insurance may not appreciably increase their demand for health care if they also face important non-financial barriers. We investigate the relationship between insurance and utilization for this group based on estimates from an empirical model of medical care use and insurance coverage. Using our estimates, we simulate potential effects of policy changes on various types of utilization, including use of mental health services and treatment for alcohol or other drug abuse. © 1997 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

The effect of passing an "anti-immigrant" ballot proposition on the use of prenatal care by foreign-born mothers in California

This study examines whether the passage of California's Proposition 187, a proposition designed to restrict undocumented immigrants from using public services, had a negative effect on the use of prenatal care and birth outcomes. Comparisons of prenatal care use and birth outcomes before and after the passage of the proposition are made between low-education foreign-born and U.S.-born mothers using California's Birth Public Use files. Multivariate linear and logistic regressions were used to control for regional and maternal characteristics. We find a significant but small decline in the use of prenatal care by low-education foreign-born women after Proposition 187 passed; however, there was no detectable deterioration of birth outcomes. Whether future reductions in the availability of prenatal care would damage the health of children is unclear.     

A prenatal intervention study to improve timeliness of immunization initiation in Latino infants

This was a prospective randomized cohort study to assess the effectiveness of an educational immunization intervention with pregnant Latinas on timely initiation of infant immunization. Study participants were recruited from two community clinics in north San Diego County. A total of three hundred and fifty-two Latinas in the third trimester of pregnancy were recruited and randomly assigned to intervention or control groups. Participants received either a culturally and linguistically appropriate session on infant immunization (intervention) or a session on prevention of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (control). The main outcome measures were pre-post immunization knowledge change and infant immunization status at 92 days. Immunization knowledge increased significantly in the intervention group [p < .0001, 95%CI (1.76, 2.47)]. No difference was found between groups in immunization series initiation: 95 percent of the children in the intervention group were up-to-date by 92 days from birth, and 93 percent of the control group was up-to-date at 92 days. The lack of significant association between receiving immunization education and infant immunization series initiation suggests that parent education may be necessary but not sufficient for timely immunization, particularly in clinics with effective well-child programs. Given the significant increase in immunization knowledge, the broader and perhaps more important implication is that language- and culturally specific infant health education messages in the prenatal period may have a positive long-term impact on the child's health and promote well-child care overall. Future studies should assess the role of prenatal well-child education in the context of clinics with low immunization levels     

An Assessment of the Use and Impact of Ancillary Prenatal Care Services to Medicaid Women in Managed Care

Objectives: Managed care plans under Medicaid are becoming a usual source of care for low-income pregnant women. This study describes an ancillary prenatal care service intervention developed by one managed care organization (MCO) for Medicaid-enrolled women, assesses the extent to which the intervention services were used, and appraises the influence of the intervention on prenatal care participation. Method: There were 226 intervention and 258 control women with a single live birth delivered between 28 and 44 weeks gestation who (1) were enrolled in the MCO's Medicaid program, (2) were high-risk based on a prenatal risk assessment, and (3) started prenatal care prior to 26 weeks gestation. Less than adequate and intensive prenatal care utilization were chosen as intervention outcomes measures. Results: Family planning, a 2-month postpartum baby visit, a maternal postpartum visit, and a WIC (Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children) referral were among the most self-selected intervention services for this population; home health aide and breast-feeding support were the least requested services. Over 90% of those needing family planning or breast-feeding services received the services, while over 20% of the intervention group refused child care, food assistance and family violence referrals, and home health aide and smoking cessation services. The intervention group had a significantly lower risk of less than adequate utilization of prenatal care (OR = .32; 95% CI: 0.17–0.60) and was more likely to have an intensive number of prenatal care visits (OR = 1.61; 95% CI: 1.05–2.48). Conclusions: The ability of managed care organizations to provide ongoing prenatal care to Medicaid populations in a cost-effective manner depends partly on their development of packages of prenatal services that foster positive preventive health care utilization behaviors and good pregnancy outcomes. The results of this project suggest that the intervention was beneficial in the area of improving utilization of prenatal care.     

Immigration legal status and use of public programs and prenatal care

This study assessed impacts of immigrants' legal status on utilization of prenatal care and public programs by non-citizen women. Interviews and chart reviews of 171 women were conducted less than 48 hours after delivery at an urban hospital. Among non-citizens, 67% were legally documented. No differences in prenatal care adequacy by legal status were detected among non-citizens, who as a group had less health insurance, worse socioeconomics, and less program use compared to U.S. citizens. Non-citizens also were less aware of newborn's citizenship and eligibility for public programs and benefits. Non-citizens utilized fewer programs while reporting greater economic hardship than citizens; however, non-citizens selectively used programs important for pregnancy. Given changes in eligibility for federal programs and high rates of reported food insecurity and socioeconomic hardship among non-citizens, monitoring for adverse effects on utilization of prenatal care and birth outcomes is needed.