MR angiography after renal revascularization: spectrum of expected anatomic results and postintervention complications.

The use of magnetic resonance (MR) angiography in screening for renal artery stenosis has been extensively evaluated. However, the MR angiographic findings after renal artery revascularization are not as well characterized. The renal artery and parenchyma can be evaluated after revascularization with a comprehensive MR imaging protocol that includes T1- and T2-weighted spin-echo sequences, three-dimensional (3D) gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography, and 3D phase-contrast MR angiography. Because surgical techniques for revascularization vary, knowledge of the surgical procedure is necessary to ensure inclusion of the pertinent anatomy at 3D gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography and to define appropriate 3D phase-contrast MR angiography volumes. The 3D gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography volume can be manipulated to view relevant vascular anatomy at the optimal obliquity and section thickness. This protocol allows robust, noninvasive evaluation of the expected arterial anatomy after revascularization, including renal artery endarterectomy, aortorenal bypass grafts, and extraanatomic reconstructions. In cases of suspected postrevascularization complications, gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography is useful because of its lack of nephrotoxicity and radiation exposure. Immediate complications of renal revascularization include renal artery thrombosis, renal infarction, and perinephric hemorrhage. Long-term complications include aneurysms of bypass grafts and recurrent stenosis of the renal artery.     

Comparison of intraarterial and IV gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography with digital subtraction angiography for the detection of renal artery stenosis in pigs.

OBJECTIVE: Catheter-based intraarterial injections of gadolinium are useful during MR imaging-guided endovascular procedures to generate rapid vascular road maps. Using an animal model of renal artery stenosis, we tested the hypothesis that intraarterial gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography is as accurate as IV gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography (DSA). We also tested the hypothesis that intraarterial MR angiography uses less gadolinium than IV MR angiography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We induced bilateral renal artery stenosis in five pigs. All pigs underwent comparative imaging with DSA, IV MR angiography, and aortic catheter-directed intraarterial MR angiography. For IV and intraarterial MR angiography, we used the same three-dimensional acquisition. We assessed differences in quantitative stenosis measurements among DSA, IV MR angiography, and intraarterial MR angiography using the Wilcoxon's signed rank test. RESULTS: Mean stenosis measurements (+/-SD) were as follows: DSA, 58% +/- 12%; IV MR angiography, 63% +/- 9.3%; and intraarterial MR angiography, 64% +/- 11%. There were no statistically significant differences in accuracy between DSA and IV MR angiography (p = 0.06), DSA and intraarterial MR angiography (p = 0.16), or IV and intraarterial MR angiography (p = 0.70). Intraarterial MR angiography used a mean gadolinium dose of 5.6 mL, compared with 9 mL for IV MR angiography. CONCLUSION: In swine, IV and intraarterial MR angiography have a similar accuracy for detecting renal artery stenosis. Intraarterial MR angiography uses smaller doses of injected gadolinium.     

Evaluation of dynamic gadolinium-enhanced breath-hold MR angiography in the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to evaluate a three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced breath-hold MR angiography sequence using standard MR gradients in detecting renal artery stenosis. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Forty-two patients referred for angiography for suspected renal artery stenosis underwent both conventional digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and MR angiography. MR angiography was performed on a 1.5-T scanner with standard gradients. A fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-echo sequence was used with the following parameters: TR/TE, 10.3/1.9; flip angle, 45 degrees; field of view, 36 x 32 cm; matrix size, 256 x 128; one excitation; volume thickness, 70 mm; and partitions, 28. Gadolinium was administered IV as a dynamic bolus of 30-40 ml. Conventional and MR angiographic images were interpreted by two radiologists in consensus. RESULTS: DSA revealed 87 renal arteries, of which 79 were in 35 patients with native kidneys and eight arteries were in seven patients with transplanted kidneys. Gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography showed 85 (98%) of 87 renal arteries. Seventeen patients had 20 significant (>50% stenosis) renal artery stenoses and five patients had five occluded renal arteries revealed by DSA. MR angiography revealed 85 renal arteries (98%), 20 stenoses (100%), and five occlusions (100%). Gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography led to one false-positive interpretation for renal artery stenosis and no false-negative interpretations. Thus, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of MR angiography for renal artery stenosis were 100%, 98%, and 99%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The MR angiography pulse sequence we used was an effective and reliable technique for the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis. The sequence can be performed on widely available MR equipment that does not require fast gradient hardware.     

MR renography with low-dose gadopentetate dimeglumine: feasibility.

PURPOSE: To develop a low-dose magnetic resonance (MR) renographic method performed with and without an angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor and in conjunction with gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography in patients with suspected renovascular disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-two patients underwent MR renography (turbo fast low-angle shot sequence: repetition time, 5 msec; echo time, 2.3 msec; flip angle, 15 degrees; one coronal image acquired every 2 seconds for 4 minutes) following intravenous injection of 2 mL of gadopentetate dimeglumine, which was repeated following intravenous injection of an ACE inhibitor. Contrast material-enhanced MR angiography was also performed. On the basis of renographic findings, renal cortex and renal medulla enhancement curves and normalized enhancement ratios were analyzed. RESULTS: The cortex and medulla showed an early transient period of enhancement within 20 seconds (vascular phase). During 1-2 minutes, a second, gradual increase in medullary enhancement, reflecting transit of filtered contrast material, was observed that was significantly greater in patients with a serum creatinine level less than 2 mg/dL (177 micromol/L) than in those with a level of 2 mg/dL or greater (P < .01). After injection of the ACE inhibitor, patients with elevated creatinine levels showed low renal medullary enhancement regardless of the presence of renal artery stenosis (RAS). However, in patients with creatinine less than 2 mg/dL, medullary enhancement ratios after injection of the ACE inhibitor were consistently lower in patients with RAS of 50% or greater than in those without stenosis (P = .02 to .08). CONCLUSION: Low-dose MR renography can be performed in the clinical setting before and after injection of an ACE inhibitor, and its potential use for evaluating decreased renal function as a consequence of RAS is promising.     

Renal artery stenosis: evaluation with conventional angiography versus gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography

PURPOSE: To evaluate the interobserver and intermodality variability of conventional angiography and gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiography in the assessment of renal artery stenosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-four patients underwent conventional angiography and gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional gradient-echo MR angiography. Three angiographers blinded to each other's interpretations and the MR angiographic findings assessed the conventional angiograms for renal artery stenosis. Similarly, three blinded MR imagers evaluated the MR angiograms. RESULTS: Interobserver variability for the degree of renal artery stenosis in the 107 kidneys evaluated was not significantly different between the two modalities. The mean SD of the degree of stenosis was 6.9% at MR angiography versus 7.5% at conventional angiography (alpha < or = .05, P > .05). In 70 kidneys (65%), the average degree of stenosis reported by the readers for the two modalities differed by 10% or less. In 22 cases (21%), the degree of stenosis was overestimated with MR angiography by more than 10% relative to the results of conventional angiography. In 15 cases (14%), the degree of stenosis was underestimated with MR angiography by more than 10%. CONCLUSION: Gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography permits evaluation of renal artery stenosis with an interobserver variability comparable with that of conventional angiography.     

Evaluation of renal arteries in living renal donors: comparison between MDCT angiography and gadolinium-enhanced 3D MR angiography

Purpose The purpose of this study was to clarify and compare the accuracy of contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) angiography using multidetector-row helical CT (MDCT angiography) and gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography using three-dimensional Fourier transformation gradient-echo sequence (3D MR angiography) for preoperative evaluation of renal arteries in living renal donors. Materials and methods A total of 42 living renal donor candidates underwent both MDCT angiography and 3D MR angiography before digital subtraction angiography (DSA). Each MDCT angiogram and 3D MR angiogram was prospectively interpreted, and the findings were compared with the DSA results. Results MDCT angiography identified all of the 12 supernumerary arteries detected by DSA, whereas 3D MR angiography identified only 8. MDCT angiography identified all of the 19 proximal arterial branches detected by DSA, whereas 3D MR angiography identified only 16. Conclusion A more accurate depiction of renal arteries in living renal donors can be achieved with MDCT angiography than with 3D MR angiography.     

Detection of renal artery stenosis: prospective comparison of captopril-enhanced Doppler sonography, captopril-enhanced scintigraphy, and MR angiography

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to compare the value of captopril-enhanced Doppler sonography, captopril-enhanced renal scintigraphy, and gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography for detecting renal artery stenosis. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Forty-one patients with suspected renovascular hypertension were prospectively examined with captopril-enhanced Doppler sonography, captopril-enhanced renal scintigraphy, gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography, and catheter angiography. The sensitivity and specificity of each technique for detecting renal artery stenosis measuring 50% or greater and 70% or greater were compared using the McNemar test. Positive and negative predictive values were estimated for populations with 5% and 30% prevalence of renal artery stenosis. Kappa values for interobserver agreement were assessed for both gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography and catheter angiography. RESULTS: For detecting renal artery stenosis measuring 50% or greater, the sensitivity of gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography (96.6%) was greater than that of captopril-enhanced Doppler sonography (69%, p = 0.005) and captopril-enhanced renal scintigraphy (41.4%, p = 0.001). No significant difference in specificity was observed among modalities. For renal artery stenosis measuring 50% or greater, positive and negative predictive values were respectively 62% and 86% for captopril-enhanced Doppler sonography, 49% and 76% for captopril-enhanced renal scintigraphy, and 53% and 98% for gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. Interobserver agreement was high for both gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography (kappa = 0.829) and catheter angiography (kappa = 0.729). CONCLUSION: Gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography is the most accurate noninvasive modality for detecting renal artery stenosis greater than or equal to 50%. The use of captopril-enhanced Doppler sonography in combination with gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography for identifying renal artery stenosis needs to be evaluated with a cost-effectiveness analysis.     

Time-resolved contrast-enhanced MR angiography of renal artery stenosis: diagnostic accuracy and interobserver variability

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate diagnostic accuracy and interobserver variability of time-resolved three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography in the detection of renal artery stenosis in comparison with intraarterial digital subtraction angiography as the standard of reference. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Forty consecutive patients (age range, 25-81 years; mean, 62.9 +/- 11.9 years) with suspected renal artery stenosis underwent intraarterial digital subtraction angiography and gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography, performed on a 1.5-T system with fast low-angle shot three-dimensional imaging (3.8/1.49 [TR/TE], 25 degrees flip angle, 10-sec acquisition time, and 1.5-mm partition thickness). Three time-resolved phases were obtained in a single breath-hold. Digital subtraction angiography and gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography were evaluated by four observers who studied 80 main renal arteries and 19 accessory vessels to evaluate the degree of stenosis. A stenosis reducing the intraarterial diameter by more than 50% was regarded as hemodynamically significant. Interobserver variability was calculated. RESULTS: Only one gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography study was not of diagnostic quality, as a result of failure of the power injector. All main branches were of diagnostic quality in 38 (97.4%) of the remaining 39 gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography studies. Seventeen (89.5%) of 19 accessory renal arteries were depicted with gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. The overall sensitivity for significant stenoses was 92.9%. The overall specificity was 83.4%, and the overall accuracy was 85.9%. Interobserver variability of gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography exceeded that of digital subtraction angiography. CONCLUSION: Time-resolved three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography is a useful noninvasive method of screening suspected renal artery stenosis because of its easy application, short examination time, and high sensitivity despite of its higher interobserver variability.     

Renal MR angiography at 1.0 T: three-dimensional (3D) phase-contrast techniques versus gadolinium-enhanced 3D fast low-angle shot breath-hold imaging.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic usefulness of three different MR angiographic techniques at 1.0 T. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: In 22 patients with renal artery stenosis confirmed at intraarterial catheter angiography, we also performed unenhanced and gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional phase-contrast MR angiography and gadolinium-enhanced single breath-hold three-dimensional fast low-angle shot MR angiography. We determined circulation time to optimize signal acquisition in gadolinium-enhanced breath-hold MR angiography after bolus injection of contrast material. RESULTS: Sensitivity, defined as the detection of a hemodynamically significant stenosis (>50% luminal narrowing), was 85% for enhanced phase-contrast MR angiography, 91% for gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography, and 95% for unenhanced phase-contrast MR angiography. The combination of unenhanced phase-contrast MR angiography and gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography yielded 100% sensitivity for hilar artery stenoses. There were 13 false-positive findings with unenhanced phase-contrast MR angiography, 10 with enhanced phase-contrast MR angiography, and four with gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography (specificity: 38%, 52%, and 79%, respectively). Accessory renal arteries were not seen on unenhanced or enhanced phase-contrast MR angiography (0/8 patients) but were detected with gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography in five of the eight patients. Interobserver agreement (kappa = .62) was best with gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. The quality of the images was unsatisfactory for adequate evaluation of segmental renal arteries with all three MR angiographic techniques. CONCLUSION: A combination of unenhanced phase-contrast MR angiography and gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography at 1.0 T proved useful as a screening protocol for renal artery stenosis.     

Quantitative assessment of glomerular filtration rate with MR gadolinium slope clearance measurements: a phase I trial

PURPOSE: To prospectively demonstrate the feasibility of quantifying the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) by assessing the renal clearance of gadolinium-based contrast medium from the extracellular fluid volume in healthy volunteers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was approved by the ethics committee and the governmental drug administration department (registration number 4030139, EudraCT number 2004-002969-20, study protocol number 318/2004). Informed consent was obtained from 16 healthy volunteers (six female, 10 male; mean age, 24.5 years +/- 2.8 [standard deviation]). Thirteen volunteers (four women, nine men; mean age, 24.8 years +/- 2.7; range, 23-30 years) successfully contributed to the study. The GFR was assessed by recording the renal clearance of gadobutrol (3.75 mL, approximately 0.05 mmol per kilogram of body weight) at navigator-gated turbo fast low-angle shot magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. Time-signal intensity curves were constructed from manually drawn regions of interest in the liver, spleen, and renal cortex, and the GFR was calculated by using exponential fitting. Simultaneously obtained iopromide clearance measurements were the reference standard. Statistical evaluations included Bland-Altman plotting and analysis of the relative deviation from iopromide clearance. RESULTS: Evaluation of liver regions of interest revealed the lowest mean of paired differences from the iopromide clearance measurements (-5.9 mL/min per 1.73 m(2) +/- 14.6), with a mean GFR of 109.0 mL/min per 1.73 m(2) +/- 17.1 (134.1 mL/min per 1.73 m(2) +/- 35.4 for spleen, 100.7 mL/min per 1.73 m(2) +/- 25.1 for renal cortex) compared with a mean GFR of 103.1 mL/min per 1.73 m(2) +/- 9.4 measured by using iopromide clearance. The maximum deviation of MR-determined gadobutrol clearance values from iopromide clearance values was 29.2%. The mean disposition half-life of gadobutrol measured in the liver was 83.0 minutes +/- 14.2 (72.4 minutes +/- 20.2 in spleen, 92.6 minutes +/- 23.7 in renal cortex). CONCLUSION: The described MR imaging method enables absolute quantification of the GFR after routine contrast material-enhanced MR imaging.     

MR angiography and preoperative evaluation for laparoscopic donor nephrectomy

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to evaluate the effectiveness of gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging in imaging arterial, venous, and ureteric anatomy in a group of potential laparoscopic renal donors and to compare our findings with those established at surgery. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Sixty-four consecutive patients underwent successful laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Imaging of the kidneys was performed before surgery with MR imaging and breath-hold three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. All studies were reviewed prospectively by one of two attending radiologists. Results were compared with findings at the time of laparoscopic nephrectomy. RESULTS: Of the 64 patients, MR imaging and MR angiography identified 30 patients with normal arterial, venous, and ureteric anatomy, and concordance was found at surgery in 29 of these patients. Vascular anomalies were depicted on MR imaging in 34 patients, with complete concordance at surgery in 29 patients. The use of MR angiography for revealing arterial anomalies had a sensitivity of 89.4%, specificity of 94.1%, and accuracy of 90.6%. For venous anomalies, there was a sensitivity of 98.3%, specificity of 100%, and accuracy of 98.4%. No important utereric anomalies were identified at surgery or on MR imaging. CONCLUSION: Renal MR imaging and gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography provide a safe, accurate, and minimally invasive means of comprehensive assessment of the potential living renal donor.     

Renal volume measurements: accuracy and repeatability of US compared with that of MR imaging.

PURPOSE: To determine the accuracy and repeatability of ultrasonography (US) with the ellipsoid formula in calculating the renal volume. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The renal volumes in 20 volunteers aged 19-51 years were determined by using US with the ellipsoid formula and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with the voxel-count method by two independent observers for each modality. The observers performed all measurements twice, with an interval between the first and second examinations. The voxel-count method was the reference standard. Repeatability was evaluated by calculating the SD of the difference (method of Bland and Altman). RESULTS: Renal volume was underestimated with US by 45 mL (25%) on average. A comparable underestimation was found when the ellipsoid formula was applied to MR images. This indicates that the inaccuracy of US renal volume measurements (a) occurred because the kidney does not resemble an ellipsoid and (b) was not primarily related to the imaging modality. Intra- and interobserver variations in US volume measurements were poor; the SD of the difference was 21-32 mL. For comparison, the SD of the difference in reference-standard measurements was 5-10 mL. CONCLUSION: Use of US with the ellipsoid formula is not appropriate for accurate and reproducible calculation of renal volume.     

Renal disease: value of functional magnetic resonance imaging with flow and perfusion measurements

PURPOSE: To differentiate healthy kidneys from diseased kidneys, we propose a combined magnetic resonance (MR) examination that includes measurements of renal arterial blood flow and parenchymal perfusion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 130 kidneys (patients/healthy volunteers: 83/47) were examined using renal artery MR flow measurements and renal parenchymal perfusion measurements, as well as contrast-enhanced MR angiography. Cine phase-contrast-flow measurements were performed using an ECG-gated fast low angle shot pulse sequence; perfusion was measured with an arterial spin labeling flow-sensitive alternating inversion recovery technique. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography was performed with a fast 3D gradient echo sequence in a single breath hold. For evaluation, kidneys were divided into groups based on nephrologic diagnosis of the patient. Recursive partitioning and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used to separate the different groups. RESULTS: Significant differences in mean renal artery flow and parenchymal perfusion were found in kidneys with renal artery stenosis as well as parenchymal disease as compared with healthy kidneys. Using a classification tree derived from the recursive partitioning, a specificity of 99% and sensitivity of 69% with a positive/negative predictive value of 97%/84% was achieved for the separation of healthy kidneys from kidneys with vascular, parenchymal or combined disease. The overall accuracy was 88%. CONCLUSION: The combination of cine PC flow measurements and MR perfusion measurements offers a comprehensive assessment of both renovascular and renoparenchymal disease and provide a noninvasive approach to differentiate between these kidneys and normal kidneys.     

Preoperative evaluation of living renal donors: comparison of CT angiography and MR angiography

PURPOSE: To compare computed tomographic (CT) angiography and magnetic resonance (MR) angiography for preoperative evaluation of living renal donors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-five living renal donors underwent preoperative contrast material-enhanced CT angiography and gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. Each study was interpreted by two independent radiologists blinded to all other studies and to interpretations provided by other reviewers. Eighteen kidneys had surgical correlation. RESULTS: CT demonstrated 33 supernumerary arteries in 19 patients, bilateral solitary arteries in 16 patients, and 18 proximal arterial branches in 16 patients. MR demonstrated 26 supernumerary arteries in 15 patients, bilateral solitary renal arteries in 20 patients, and 21 proximal arterial branches in 16 patients. Interobserver agreements for MR (kappa = 0. 74) and CT (kappa = 0.73) were similar to the agreement between MR and CT (kappa = 0.74). Among the kidneys chosen for nephrectomy, one small accessory artery and one proximal arterial branch were missed with CT and MR. Two of the accessory arteries suggested at CT were not found at nephrectomy. By averaging data for both modalities, supernumerary arteries were present in 49% of kidney donors and were bilateral in approximately 17%. Proximal arterial branches were present in 46% of kidney donors. CONCLUSION: Preoperative CT and MR angiography of the renal arteries in renal donors demonstrate substantial agreement. Interobserver disagreement in the interpretation of CT and MR angiograms is related to 1-2-mm-diameter vessels.     

Dynamic three-dimensional MR renography for the measurement of single kidney function: initial experience

A three-dimensional magnetic resonance (MR) renographic method to measure single kidney glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and split renal function was developed that is based on renal signal intensity measurements during 2-3 minutes after intravenous injection of a low dose (2 mL or 0.01 mmol/kg) of gadopentetate dimeglumine. In nine subjects, single kidney MR GFR indices correlated well with technetium 99m (99mTc) diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA) clearance (r = 0.7-0.8) for GFR values of 7-48 mL/min. MR right kidney split renal function values (range, 32%-59%) also correlated well with 99mTc-DTPA radionuclide measurements (r = 0.76); differences between the two methods averaged 0.8% +/- 8. MR renography was performed along with contrast material-enhanced MR imaging of the kidneys and renal arteries and added 8 minutes or less to the total examination time.     

Quantitative SPECT of 99mTc-DMSA uptake in kidneys of infants with unilateral ureteropelvic junction obstruction: assessment of structural and functional abnormalities.

We evaluated individual renal function using quantitative SPECT of dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) uptake by the kidneys (QDMSA) in infants with unilateral ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) obstruction and compared our findings with infants without obstruction. METHODS: QDMSA was performed on 13 infants (mean age of 2.8 +/- 2.8 mo) with unilateral UPJ obstruction and on 15 age-matched controls without obstruction. RESULTS: Control kidneys (n = 30) had a volume of 43.5 +/- 8.8 mL, a percentage injected dose (%ID)/mL 0.62 +/- 0.12 and uptake of 26.1% +/- 3.9%. Kidneys with UPJ obstruction (n = 13) had a volume of 61.2 +/- 19.3 mL, a %ID/mL of 0.42 +/- 0.11 and uptake of 25.4% +/- 8.2%. Contralateral kidneys (n = 13) had a volume of 44.0 +/- 11.9 mL, a %ID/mL of 0.57 +/- 0.16 and uptake of 24.2% +/- 4.6%. The uptake in obstructed kidneys was similar to that observed in contralateral and control kidneys (t = -0.77, P = 0.45; t = -0.37, P = 0.71; respectively). UPJ kidneys had a statistically significant increased volume and decreased %ID/mL, compared with contralateral kidneys (t = 3.35, P < 0.006 and t = 3.75, P < 0.003, respectively) and control kidneys (t = -4.2, P < 0.001 and t = 4.7, P < 0.001, respectively). There was no significant difference between contralateral kidneys and control kidneys regarding volume (t = -0.16, P = 0.87), %ID/mL (t = 0.98, P = 0.33) and uptake (t = -1.41, P = 0.16). Of 13 infants, 11 (85%) showed large kidneys with thinning of the renal cortex. In 1 infant, there was no difference between the obstructed and contralateral kidneys regarding volume, %ID/mL and uptake, and 1 infant showed significant decreased uptake in the UPJ kidney compared with the contralateral kidney. CONCLUSION: Although the overall renal function of the obstructed kidneys remained unchanged, there was a statistically significant decrease in the %ID/mL of renal tissue in UPJ kidneys, which may represent renal dysfunction. Increased functional volume with a thin cortex may represent a compensatory mechanism of the obstructed kidney. Such changes may contribute to the understanding of pathophysiologic mechanisms and may be an early sign of obstruction in infants with hydronephrosis. Further longitudinal studies with an extended number of infants and serial measurements of kidney volumes and %ID/mL are warranted to assess the significance of QDMSA in the management of infants with asymptomatic unilateral renal pelvic dilatation.     

Three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography: applications for abdominal imaging.

Three-dimensional (3D) gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiography is a versatile technique that combines speed, superb contrast, and relative simplicity. It has a wide range of applications, particularly in the abdomen and pelvis, where superb images of the abdominal aorta and renal arteries are routinely obtained. Aneurysms, atherosclerotic lesions, and occlusions of the major mesenteric arteries are also well depicted. In addition, 3D gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography is ideal for noninvasive evaluation of the systemic and mesenteric veins and can be used to demonstrate parenchymal lesions in the liver, pancreas, kidneys, and other organs. It is also useful in staging genitourinary neoplasms: Parenchymal lesions, venous extension, and adenopathy are all clearly depicted. Three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography can be useful in the preoperative evaluation of potential transplant donors and recipients and in the evaluation of vascular complications following transplantation. Delayed 3D acquisitions of the kidneys, ureters, and bladder can be performed routinely to generate gadolinium-enhanced urograms and demonstrate obstruction, delayed function, filling defects, and masses. A variety of methods for increasing the speed and improving the resolution of 3D acquisition are currently under investigation. These include novel imaging and reformatting techniques and the use of intravascular contrast agents with much longer vascular half-lives.     

Thoracic aorta: comparison of single-dose breath-hold and double-dose non-breath-hold gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare single-dose (0.1 mmol/kg) breath-hold gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional (3D) MR angiography and double-dose (0.2 mmol/kg) non-breath-hold 3D MR angiography for evaluation of thoracic aortic disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-five patients referred for MR evaluation of the thoracic aorta underwent non-breath-hold gadolinium-enhanced 3D MR angiography on a 1.5-T scanner with standard gradients (TR/TE, 21/6; flip angle, 30 degrees) during slow infusion of a double dose of gadopentetate dimeglumine using a body coil. Subsequently, the same patients underwent breath-hold MR imaging with high-performance gradients (TR/TE, 5/2; flip angle, 30 degrees-50 degrees), a timing examination, and power injection of a single dose of gadolinium. For both studies, quantitative signal-to-noise measurements were obtained for the ascending thoracic, descending thoracic, and abdominal aorta. Three observers retrospectively evaluated each examination for degree of enhancement of the aorta, pulmonary arteries, and systemic veins; motion artifacts; and overall image quality. RESULTS: Single-dose breath-hold gadolinium-enhanced 3D MR angiography showed greater signal-to-noise ratio, fewer motion artifacts, and better overall image quality (p < .05) than the non-breath-hold double-dose technique. The single-dose technique also showed significantly better qualitative enhancement of the aortic root and ascending aorta (p < .05) and less enhancement of the pulmonary arteries, renal veins, and left internal jugular vein (p < .05). CONCLUSION: Optimized single-dose breath-hold gadolinium-enhanced 3D MR angiography is superior to double-dose non-breath-hold 3D MR angiography for evaluation of thoracic aortic disease.     

Renal arterial stenosis: prospective comparison of color Doppler US and breath-hold, three-dimensional, dynamic, gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography

PURPOSE: To compare color Doppler ultrasonography (US) with fast, breath-hold, three-dimensional, gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiography in detecting renal arterial stenosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-five patients with clinical suspicion of renovascular disease were prospectively examined with intra- and extrarenal color Doppler US and breath-hold, gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. Digital subtraction arteriography (DSA) was the standard of reference in all patients for the number of renal arteries and degree of stenosis. RESULTS: DSA depicted 103 arteries and 52 stenoses. Color Doppler US was nondiagnostic in two examinations. Significantly more of 13 accessory renal arteries were detected with MR angiography (n = 12) than with color Doppler US (n = 3; P <.05). For assessing all stenoses, the sensitivity and accuracy were 94% and 91%, respectively, for MR angiography and 71% and 76%, respectively, for US (P <.05). The sensitivity was higher for MR angiography (100%) than for US (79%; P <.05) in diagnosing stenoses with at least 50% narrowing. The specificity, accuracy, and negative predictive value in diagnosing stenoses of at least 50% narrowing were 93%, 95%, and 100% for MR angiography and 93%, 89%, and 90% for US. CONCLUSION: Breath-hold, gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography is superior to color Doppler US in accessory renal artery detection. Although the specificity of MR angiography is similar to that of color Doppler US, MR angiography has a better sensitivity and negative predictive value in depicting renal arterial stenoses.     

High-spatial-resolution MR angiography of renal arteries with integrated parallel acquisitions: comparison with digital subtraction angiography and US

PURPOSE: To retrospectively compare three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiography, performed with an integrated parallel acquisition technique for high isotropic spatial resolution, with selective digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and intravascular ultrasonography (US) for accuracy of diameter and area measurements in renal artery stenosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was approved by the institutional review board, and consent was obtained from all patients. Forty-five patients (17 women, 28 men; mean age, 62.2 years) were evaluated for suspected renal artery stenosis. Three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiograms were acquired with isotropic spatial resolution of 0.8 x 0.8 x 0.9 mm in 23-second breath-hold with an integrated parallel acquisition technique. In-plane diameter of stenosis was measured along vessel axis, and perpendicular diameter and area of stenosis were assessed in cross sections orthogonal to vessel axis, on multiplanar reformations. Interobserver agreement between two radiologists in measurements of in-plane and perpendicular diameters of stenosis and perpendicular area of stenosis was assessed with mean percentage of difference. In a subset of patients, degree of stenosis at MR angiography was compared with that at DSA (n = 20) and intravascular US (n = 11) by using Bland-Altman plots and correlation analyses. RESULTS: Mean percentage of difference in stenosis measurement was reduced from 39.3% +/- 78.4 (standard deviation) with use of in-plane views to 12.6% +/- 9.5 with use of cross-sectional views (P < .05). Interobserver agreement for stenosis grading based on perpendicular area of stenosis was significantly better than that for stenosis grading based on in-plane diameter of stenosis (mean percentage of difference, 15.2% +/- 24.2 vs 54.9% +/- 186.9; P < .001). Measurements of perpendicular area of stenosis on MR angiograms correlated well with those on intravascular US images (r(2) = 0.90). CONCLUSION: Evaluation of cross-sectional images reconstructed from high-spatial-resolution three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR renal angiographic data increases the accuracy of the technique and decreases interobserver variability.