Combined thoracoscopic and laparoscopic minimally invasive esophagectomy

With the improvement in thoracoscopic and laparoscopic surgery, thoracoscopic and laparoscopic esophagectomy (TLE), a minimally invasive approach, has attracted increasing attention as an alternative to open three-field esophagectomy. From June 2012 to October 2013, 90 patients underwent laparoscopic and thoracoscopic resection of esophageal carcinoma in our department. The VATS esophagectomy technique described here is the approach currently employed in the department of thoracic surgery at Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital of China.     

Short-term postoperative superiority and 5-year follow-up outcomes of video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy for treatment of esophageal carcinoma: a historical comparison with conventional open esophagectomy under a single experienced surgeon

Background

Few reports have provided a direct comparison of thoracoscopic and open esophagectomy for treatment of esophageal carcinoma in a sufficiently large number of patients with an adequate follow-up period.

Methods

We compared the short- and long-term (up to 5 years after surgery) outcomes of 121 patients who had undergone video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy with 3-field lymphadenectomy (the VATE group) and 74 patients who had undergone conventional open esophagectomy with 3-field lymphadenectomy (the OE group) for treatment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Results

Total and intrathoracic operation times were longer and total and intrathoracic blood losses were lower in the VATE group than in the OE group. The number of dissected lymph nodes around the left recurrent laryngeal nerve was significantly higher, while both the intensive care unit stay and postoperative hospital stay were significantly shorter in the VATE group. Moreover, the frequency of postoperative analgesia use was lower in the VATE group. Overall morbidity and mortality rates were similar, and the incidences of overall, surgical-site, and thoracic wound infections were significantly lower in the VATE group. Additionally, the incidence of postoperative pneumonia was also lower in the VATE group, although the difference was not statistically significant. No differences were observed in recurrence or survival rates.

Conclusion

Video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy with 3-field lymphadenectomy is a safe and effective surgical method that can be used as an alternative to conventional open esophagectomy in patients with curable esophageal carcinoma.     

Thoracoscopic and laparoscopic esophagectomy with cervical manual anastomosis for esophageal cancer

Evidence on the benefits of minimally invasive approach over traditional open procedure in gastrointestinal surgery is continuing to accumulate. This is also the case for esophageal surgery.Although laparoscopic esophageal surgery was initially reserved for benign pathology, the technical development, increasing experience with laparoscopic and thoracoscopic techniques and the theoretical advantages of minimally invasive surgery have widened the scope of minimally invasive approach to esophageal cancer. The surgical treatment of esophageal cancer often requires extensive procedures and is therefore, considered one of the most challenging and invasive procedure of gastrointestinal surgery. While transhiatal and transthoracic esophagectomy are common approaches for esophageal resection, data regarding the combined thoracoscopic and laparoscopic approach to esophagectomy are limited. The minimally invasive technique of esophagectomy to be described consists of three phases: thoracoscopic esophageal mobilization and mediastinal lymphadenectomy followed by laparoscopic gastric mobilization, abdominal lymphadenectomy and gastric conduit formation and finally retrieval of the resection specimen followed by an esophagogastric anastomosis via a left cervical incision.     

Application of a modified McKeown procedure (thoracoscopic esophageal mobilization three‐incision esophagectomy) in esophageal cancer surgery: Initial experience with 30 cases

Early efforts with minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) were hybrid approaches. No conclusive benefit was seen with this approach compared with the standard open procedure. Total MIE has demonstrated its advantages in single institution series. The drawbacks of total MIE include the steep learning curve and the high cost of the disposable instrumentation. We sought to determine the feasibility of modifying the surgical technique involved in the hybrid approach in an effort to decrease the cost of the surgery without compromising the outcome. From December 2007 to September 2008, the modified McKeown procedure (thoracoscopic esophageal mobilization three‐incision esophagectomy) was performed in 30 cases. The median operative time was 225 minutes (range, 195 ?290 minutes) and the median average time of VATS was 70 minutes (range, 50 ?130 minutes). Median lymph node retrieval was 25.6 ± 4.8 nodes (15.1 ± 3.4 intrathoracic) per patient. The median postoperative hospital stay was 17.1 ± 6.3 days. There was no in‐hospital (30 days) mortality. Postoperative complications occurred in 9 patients (30%), including 2 (6.7%) pneumonia, 1 (3.3%) chylothorax, 1 (3.3%) delayed gastric emptying ,1 (3.3%) vocal cord palsy, 2 (6.7%) neck anastomotic leaks, and 2 (6.7%) arrhythmias. This procedure is technically feasible and safe with lower mortality and mobility. The short‐term surgical outcomes are comparable with most of the total MIE reports. Performing the gastric mobilization and spontaneous neck anastomosis first greatly facilitate and simplifies the VATS maneuver.     

Appraisal of the simultaneous right-thoracic and abdominal approach with intrathoracic reconstruction after esophageal resection for patients with intrathoracic esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND/AIMS: This study evaluated the surgical procedure with the simultaneous right-thoracic and abdominal approaches with intrathoracic reconstruction after performing a macroscopically curable esophageal resection and a mediastio-abdominal extended lymphadenectomy as the standard operation for patients with intrathoracic esophageal cancer. METHODOLOGY: Forty-seven patients with thoracic esophageal cancer were operated on at the Department of Surgery I, Gunma University Hospital from 1995 to 1999. Before the end of 1997, all 21 cases underwent subtotal esophagectomy with three-field lymphadenectomy. After 1998, however, 16 cases underwent the same procedure while the remaining 10 underwent a simultaneous right-thoracic and abdominal approach with intrathoracic reconstruction with lymphadenectomy based on our criteria (Group I). Postoperative factors including the data of cytokines were compared between Group I and conventional subtotal (10 cases) esophagectomy with three-field lymphadenectomy (Group II, 37 cases). RESULTS: None of the patients in Group I has shown a recurrence of cancer. The CRP levels at 2 POD and the serum IL 6 levels at 3 POD were significantly lower in Group I than in Group II (p<0.05), and the postoperative duration of mechanical ventilation was also significantly shorter in Group I than in Group II (p<0.001). The postoperative body weight gain at 12 months after surgery was also higher in Group I than in Group II. CONCLUSIONS: This procedure is indicated for patients with esophageal cancer, located in the middle- or lower-thoracic esophagus, limited to within the esophageal wall, and without either upper mediastinal or neck lymph node metastasis, in order to not only cure the cancer but also in order to improve the postoperative quality of life.     

Salvage surgery after definitive chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer

Background Definitive chemoradiotherapy has been performed as a first-line treatment for esophageal cancer, whereas salvage surgery might be the only reliable treatment for patients with recurrence after definitive chemoradiotherapy.Methods We reviewed 38 patients with squamous cell carcinoma who underwent esophagectomy and 6 patients who underwent lymphadenectomy after definitive chemoradiotherapy (≥50 Gy).Results The median survival time and 5-year survival rate after salvage esophagectomy were 16 months and 27%, respectively. Three of the 7 patients who had cervical esophageal cancer underwent cervical esophagectomy with laryngeal preservation. Two patients (5.2%) who underwent salvage esophagectomy with three-field lymphadenectomy before 1997 died of postoperative complications, but no patient died of complications thereafter. Although the overall survival after salvage esophagectomy was correlated with residual tumor (R) (P = 0.0097), the median survival time of 7 patients with residual tumors (R₂) was 7 months. Overall postoperative survival was closely correlated with the response to chemoradiotherapy (P < 0.0001) but was not associated with histologic effects on resected specimens. Survival was significantly correlated with the depth of viable tumor invasion (pT) (P = 0.0013) and with lymph node metastasis (pN) (P < 0.0001). Long-term survival was achieved in 5 of the 6 patients who underwent salvage lymphadenectomy.Conclusions Salvage surgery should be considered for patients with recurrence after definitive chemoradiotherapy. Salvage lymphadenectomy may be useful for recurrence confined to the lymph nodes whereas postoperative complications of salvage esophagectomy should be warranted.     

Robot‐assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy with extensive mediastinal lymphadenectomy: experience with 114 consecutive patients with intrathoracic esophageal cancer

The study aims to report the operative outcomes of robot‐assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy (RATE) with extensive mediastinal lymphadenectomy (ML) for intrathoracic esophageal cancer. We analyzed a prospective database of 114 consecutive patients who underwent RATE with lymph node dissection along recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) followed by cervical esophagogastrostomy. The study included 104 men with a mean age of 63.1 ± 0.8 years. Of these, 110 (96.5%) had squamous cell carcinoma, and the location of the tumor was upper esophagus in 7 (6.1%), middle in 62 (54.4%), and lower in 45 (39.5%). Preoperative concurrent chemoradiation was performed in 15 patients (13.2%). All but one patient underwent successful RATE, and R0 resection was achieved in 111 patients (97.4%). Extended ML and total ML were performed in 24 (21.1%) and 90 (78.9%) patients, respectively. Total operation time was 419.6 ± 7.9 minutes, and robot console time was 206.6 ± 5.2 minutes. The mean number of total, mediastinal, and RLN nodes was 43.5 ± 1.4, 24.5 ± 1.0, and 9.7 ± 0.7, respectively. The most common complication was RLN palsy (30, 26.3%), followed by anastomotic leakage (17, 14.9%) and pulmonary complications (11, 9.6%). Median hospital stay was 16 days, and 90‐day mortality was observed in three patients (2.5%). On multivariate analysis, preoperative concurrent chemoradiation was a risk factor for pulmonary complications (odds ratio 7.42, 95% confidence interval 1.91–28.8, P = 0.004). RATE with extensive ML could be performed safely with acceptable postoperative outcomes. Long‐term survival data should be followed in the future to verify the oncological outcome of the procedure.     

Laparoscopic and thoracoscopic esophagectomy with intrathoracic anastomosis for middle or lower esophageal carcinoma

Thoracoscopic mobilization of esophagus and laparoscopic mobilization of stomach with cervical anastomosis is employed widely in minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for esophageal carcinoma. However, it is associated with high incidence of complications, including recurrent laryngeal nerve injury and anastomotic leak. This paper summarizes the key techniques in total laparoscopic and thoracoscopic esophagectomy with intrathoracic anastomosis for MIE in 62 patients of middle or lower esophageal cancer between March 2012 and August 2013. Total laparoscopic and thoracoscopic esophagectomy with intrathoracic anastomosis was performed to treat the middle or lower esophageal cancer. Laparoscopic and thoracoscopic Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy was performed using a circular stapler (Johnson and Johnson) intrathoracically to staple esophagogastric anastomosis and reconstruct the digestive tract. In addition, we performed tension-relieving anastomotic suture and embedded with pedicled omental flap. Compared with the trans-orally inserted anvil (OrVil) approach, the technique reported here is safe, feasible and user-friendly. Total thoracoscopic intrathoracic anastomosis can be performed with a circular stapler (Johnson and Johnson).     

Perioperative outcomes of esophagectomy preceded by the laparoscopic transhiatal approach for esophageal cancer

This study was designed to determine the efficacy of esophagectomy preceded by the laparoscopic transhiatal approach (LTHA) with regard to the perioperative outcomes of esophageal cancer. The esophageal hiatus was opened by hand‐assisted laparoscopic surgery, and carbon dioxide was introduced into the mediastinum. Dissection of the distal esophagus was performed up to the level of the tracheal bifurcation. En bloc dissection of the posterior mediastinal lymph nodes was performed using LTHA. Next, cervical lymphadenectomy, reconstruction via a retrosternal route with a gastric tube and anastomosis from a cervical approach were performed. Finally, a small thoracotomy (around 10 cm in size) was made to extract the thoracic esophagus and allow upper mediastinal lymphadenectomy to be performed. The treatment outcomes of 27 esophageal cancer patients who underwent LTHA‐preceding esophagectomy were compared with those of 33 patients who underwent the transthoracic approach preceding esophagectomy without LTHA (thoracotomy; around 20 cm in size). The intrathoracic operative time and operative bleeding were significantly decreased by LTHA. The total operative time did not differ between the two groups, suggesting that the abdominal procedure was longer in the LTHA group. The number of resected lymph nodes did not differ between the two groups. Postoperative respiratory complications occurred in 18.5% of patients treated with LTHA and 30.3% of those treated without it. The increase in the number of peripheral white blood cells and the duration of thoracic drainage were significantly decreased by this method. Our surgical procedure provides a good surgical view of the posterior mediastinum, markedly shortens the intrathoracic operative time, and decreases the operative bleeding without increasing major postoperative complications.     

Surgical treatment of esophageal leiomyoma located near or at the esophagogastric junction via a thoracoscopic approach

Esophageal leiomyoma can be enucleated safely and effectively by minimally invasive surgery. The laparoscopic approach has been a conventional option for this kind of tumor located near or at the esophagogastric (EG) junction. The aims of this study were to evaluate the surgical outcome of thoracoscopic resection of leiomyoma at the EG junction, and discuss factors affecting the incidence of postoperative gastroesophageal reflux. Fourteen patients who underwent thoracoscopic resection of esophageal leiomyoma located near or at the EG junction (<4 cm above the esophageal hiatus) from January 2002 to August 2007 were reviewed retrospectively. Tumor characteristics, surgical methods, and postoperative outcomes were evaluated. A left approach of video-assisted thoracoscopy was used in 13 patients; a right approach was used for the other patient, whose multiple tumors were located in the EG junction and mid-esophagus. Postoperative recovery was uneventful in all patients, with no mucosa leakage or other significant complications. Mean tumor size was 3.2 cm (1.2–6.0 cm). Of the 14 patients, two had serpiginous leiomyoma, two had multiple tumors, and the others had solitary tumors. Mean postoperative stay in hospital was 7 days (4–11 days). Postoperative dysphagia was not reported, although gastroesophageal reflux was noted in one patient. Thoracoscopic resection of esophageal leiomyomas near or at the EG junction is feasible, with a low prevalence of postoperative gastroesophageal reflux.     

Transthoracal partial resection or local excision of small esophageal carcinoma with a radical mediastinal lymphadenectomy--proposal of limited operation for postoperative quality of life

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Controversy remains regarding which treatment should be employed for superficial esophageal cancer. The treatment modalities for such superficial cancers vary from a local excision, including an endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) to an extended radical esophagectomy (three-field lymphadenectomy). In the current report, we proposed the use of either a transthoracal partial resection or local excision of the esophagus with a radical mediastinal lymphadenectomy for the patients with small superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, in order to perform effective radical cancer surgery and maintain the quality of life (QOL) of the patients. METHODOLOGY: Surgical procedures: After thoracotomy and detaching of the esophagus from the surrounding tissues, the proximal and distal resection lines were determined by careful palpation of the clips within the esophagus which had been placed during the preoperative endoscopic examination. Thereafter, a mediastinal lymph node dissection, including the bilateral recurrent nerve nodes and paratracheal nodes, was performed. After this procedure, intrathoracic esophageal end-to-end anastomosis was performed in the ordinary manner. We performed this procedure on three patients with small localized esophageal cancer. RESULTS: Operations were safely performed on these three patients and postoperative quality of life was almost satisfactory. CONCLUSIONS: Transthoracal partial resection or local excision with a radical mediastinal lymphadenectomy was useful for the patients with small localized esophageal carcinoma.     

Two-step three-field lymph node dissection is beneficial for thoracic esophageal carcinoma

Aggressive surgery including extensive lymph node dissection is considered necessary to improve the long-term survival of patients with esophageal carcinoma. While three-field lymph node dissection is widely performed for patients with thoracic esophageal carcinoma, cervical lymph node metastasis is uncommon. In order to reduce surgical stress, we have developed a two-step three-field lymph node dissection procedure for thoracic esophageal carcinoma. In the first-step operation, total thoracic esophagectomy through a right thoracotomy is performed. Mediastinal and abdominal lymph node dissection is performed synchronously. When recurrent nerve lymph node metastasis is pathologically positive, cervical lymph node dissection is performed about 3 weeks after the first operation (second step). Of 343 patients with carcinoma of the esophagus surgically treated in our department between 1990 and 2001, 146 underwent the operation described above. Three-field dissection was performed in 68 patients (group A), while two-field dissection was performed in 78 patients (group B). In the 68 group A patients, cervical lymph node metastasis was positive in 15 patients (22%). There was no marked difference in the onset of major complications between the two groups. The 5-year survival rate was 58% for group A and 61% for group B, not a statistically significant difference. In 78 of the 146 patients, it was possible to avoid cervical lymph node dissection without negatively affecting therapeutic outcomes. Two-step three-field lymph node dissection can reduce surgical stress of patients with good clinical outcome.     

Treatment of dysphagia in esophageal carcinoma: Transthoracic En-Bloc esophagectomy and reconstruction 48 hours later

In 82 consecutive patients with esophageal cancer (90% squamous cell carcinoma, 10% adenocarcinoma) transthoracic “en bloc” esophagotomy with regional lymphadenectomy was performed. The reconstruction with gastric interposition was carried out with delayed urgency in a second operation 48–72 h after the initial procedure. The results of this group were compared to a group of 65 patients who had transmediastinal esophagectomy without thoractotomy and mediastinal as well as suprapancreatic lymphadenectomy and immediate reconstruction by gastric interposition. The number of postoperative risk situations concerning cardiopulmonary features were comparable in both groups. The 30-day mortality rate and postoperative morbidity was not significantly different between both patient groups (mortality rate: transthoracic: 6.6%, transmediastinal: 7.7%). The advantages of a 2-stage procedure are that esophagectomy and especially mediastinal lymphadenectomy can be performed precisely without time pressure. After 2 days the stomach is hypotonic and dilated as a result of truncal vagotomy and can easily be elevated to the neck. The interval of 48–72 hours was chosen because the postoperative right-to-left shunt has nearly normalized after this time period. En bloc esophagectomy and reconstruction with delayed urgency can be performed without disadvantages compared to a 1-stage procedure. It can especially be recommended for operations in which esophagectomy and mediastinal lymphadenectomy are difficult and wearisome.     

Patient reported outcomes (PROs) after minimally invasive and open esophagectomy

Esophagectomy for esophageal malignancies remains an operation with significant potential morbidity and mortality. However, surgical outcomes continue to improve over time and focus has shifted toward not just good outcomes, but quality of life post operatively. Patient reported outcomes (PROs) focus of quality of life measures via validated patient surveys has increasingly become a significant focus. While PROs do have their limitations, they represent a glimpse into the symptomatology, quality of life, and well-being of a patient undergoing a procedure with inherent morbidity. Working to improve outcomes from the perspective of the patient is not a new concept, but has becoming increasingly relevant as surgical quality for all procedures improves. The optimal approach to esophagectomy is controversial. Minimally invasive approaches attempt to avoid laparotomy and thoracotomy with the thought of improving post-operative quality of life by mitigating complications related to those open surgical approaches. The data in favor of laparoscopy and thoracoscopy is quite strong and multiple randomized controlled trials exist in this realm supporting minimally invasive approaches with regards to quality of life outcomes and more rapid return to patient’s preoperative baseline. The data in favor of a robotic approach for esophagectomy is not quite as robust, but more studies show that these approaches mirror the benefits of the laparoscopic and thoracoscopic approaches without robotic assistance.     

Thoracoscopic and laparoscopic radical esophagectomy with lateral-prone position

With 20 years of development, minimally-invasive treatment for esophageal cancer has been widely spread. However, surgeons have not reached consensus about the optimal minimally-invasive operation method, or whether the effect of radical lymph nodes dissection is comparable to the traditional open procedure. Thoracoscopic esophagectomy with lateral-prone position combines the advantages of both lateral position (allowing quick conversion to open procedure) and prone position (good visual area and complete lymphadenectomy). Together with laparoscopic abdominal lymphadenectomy, gastric tube formation and jejunostomy, this approach provides an easier way for minimally-invasive radical esophagectomy. In this article, approaches for thoracoscopic esophagectomy with lateral-prone position and total mediastinal lymphadenectomy, combined with totally laparoscopic gastric mobilization, abdominal lymphadenectomy, gastric tube formation and jejunostomy, will be presented by video instructions. All the procedures were under the rule of radical lymphadenectomy. Cervical lymph nodes dissection and esophago-gastrostomy were the same as those in open procedure, which will not be discussed here.     

Two-field lymph-node dissection may be enough to treat patients with submucosal squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus

Significance of extended radical surgical treatment including three-field lymph node dissection for squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the esophagus remains debatable. The aim of the current study was to reconsider the merits and demerits obtained by three-field lymph node dissection for esophageal carcinoma and also to attempt to elucidate an appropriate surgical strategy for submucosal SCC of the thoracic esophagus. Thirty-one patients with SCC of the thoracic esophagus who had been treated with esophagectomy and two-field (thoracic and abdominal) lymph node dissection without preoperative therapies were enrolled. Five-year survival rate was 75.0% and the incidence proportion of postoperative complication was 9.7%. These data regarding postoperative outcome of patients were by no means inferior to those in the previous reports referring the prognosis of patients with esophageal carcinoma who had been treated with three-field lymph node dissection. Authors would like to mention that two-field lymph node dissection associated with reduced incidence of postoperative complications might be enough to treat the submucosal SCC of the thoracic esophagus.     

Ivor Lewis subtotal esophagectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy for squamous cell carcinoma of the lower thoracic esophagus

AIM： To evaluate the clinical outcome of Ivor Lewis subtotal esophagectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy for patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the lower thoracic esophagus. METHODS： From January 1998 to December 2001, 73 patients with lower thoracic esophageal carcinoma underwent Ivor-Lewis subtotal esophagectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy. Clinicopathological information, postoperative complications, mortality and long term survival of all these patients were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS： The operative morbidity and mortality was 15.1% and the mortality was 2.7%. Lymph node metastases were found in 52 patients （71.2%）. Nodal metastases to the upper, middle, lower mediastini and upper abdomen were found in 13 （17.8%）, 15 （20.5%）, 30 （41.1%）, and 25 （34.2%） patients, respectively. Postoperative staging was as follows： stage Ⅰ in 5 patients, stage Ⅱ in 34 patients, stage Ⅲ in 32 patients, and stage Ⅳ in 2 patients, respectively. The overall 5-year survival rate was 23.3%. For NO and N1 patients, the 5-year survival rate was 38.1% and 17.3%, respectively （X^2 = 22.65, P 〈 0.01）. The 5-year survival rate for patients in stages Ⅱ a, Ⅱ b and Ⅲ was 31.2%, 27.8% and 12.5%, repsectively （X^2 = 29.18, P 〈 0.01）. CONCLUSION： Ivor Lewis subtotal esophagectomy with two-field （total mediastinum） lymphadenectomy is a safe and appropriate operation for squamous cell carcinoma of the lower thoracic esophagus.     

Short‐term outcomes of robotic radical esophagectomy for esophageal cancer by a nontransthoracic approach compared with conventional transthoracic surgery

Transthoracic esophagectomy (TTE) is believed to have advantages for mediastinal lymphadenectomy in the treatment of resectable esophageal cancer despite its association with a greater incidence of pulmonary complications and postoperative mortality. Transhiatal esophagectomy is regarded as less invasive, though insufficient in terms of lymph node dissection. With the aim of achieving lymph dissection equivalent to that of TTE, we have developed a nontransthoracic esophagectomy (NTTE) procedure combining a video‐assisted cervical approach for the upper mediastinum and a robot‐assisted transhiatal approach for the middle and lower mediastinum. We prospectively studied 22 accumulated cases of NTTE and verified feasibility by analyzing perioperative and histopathological outcomes. We compared this group's short‐term outcomes with outcomes of 139 equivalent esophageal cancer cases operated on at our institution by conventional TTE (TTE group). In the NTTE group, there were no procedure‐related events and no midway conversions to the conventional surgery; the mean operation time was longer (median, 524 vs. 428 minutes); estimated blood loss did not differ significantly between the two groups (median, 385 mL vs. 490 mL); in the NTTE group, the postoperative hospital stay was shorter (median, 18 days vs. 24 days). No postoperative pneumonia occurred in the NTTE group. The frequencies of other major postoperative complications did not differ significantly, nor were there differences in the numbers of harvested mediastinal lymph nodes (median, 30 vs. 29) or in other histopathology findings. NTTE offers a new radical procedure for resection of esophageal cancer combining a cervical video‐assisted approach and a transhiatal robotic approach. Although further accumulation of surgical cases is needed to corroborate these results, NTTE promises better prevention of pulmonary complications in the management of esophageal cancer.     

Laparoscopic ischemic conditioning of the stomach prior to esophagectomy

Several complications after esophagectomy with gastric pull‐up are associated with ischemia within the gastric conduit. The aim of this study is to assess the feasibility of laparoscopic ischemic preconditioning of the stomach prior to thoracotomy, esophagectomy, and gastric pull‐up with an intrathoracic anastomosis. A retrospective review of 24 consecutive patients between October 2008 and July 2011 with esophageal adenocarcinoma (stage I–III) undergoing laparoscopic gastric ischemic conditioning prior to esophagectomy was conducted. Conditioning included laparoscopic ligation of the left and short gastric arteries, celiac node dissection, and jejunostomy tube placement. Formal resection and reconstruction was then performed 4–10 days later. Of the 24 patients, 88% received neoadjuvant chemotherapy/radiation therapy. Twenty‐three of the 24 patients underwent successful laparoscopic ischemic conditioning and subsequent esophagectomy. Total mean number of lymph nodes harvested was 21.8 (±8.0), and a mean of 5.3 (±2.4) celiac lymph nodes identified. There were no conversions to an open procedure. Length of stay was 3.8 (±4.8) days with a median length of stay of 2 (1–24) days. Three patients experienced anastomotic leak, six patients experience delayed gastric emptying, and two patients developed anastomotic stricture. There were no surgical site infections. R0 resection was achieved in all patients who underwent laparoscopic ischemic conditioning followed by esophagectomy. Laparoscopic ischemic conditioning of the gastric conduit has been shown to be feasible and safe.     

Predictive factors for postoperative tachyarrhythmia after thoracoscopic esophagectomy and the usefulness of landiolol hydrochloride for its treatment

Background

Tachyarrhythmia after esophagectomy is a severe complication that should not be underestimated because of its negative impact. The aims of this study were to clarify the cause and impact of postoperative tachyarrhythmia after thoracoscopic esophagectomy. Additionally, we analyzed the usefulness of landiolol administration for postoperative tachyarrhythmia.

Methods

We evaluated the predictive factors for tachyarrhythmia onset after surgery and its clinical impact in 127 patients who underwent thoracoscopic esophagectomy with extended lymphadenectomy. Moreover, we analyzed the efficacy of landiolol for postoperative tachyarrhythmia.

Results

Tachyarrhythmia developed in 38 of the 127 patients. Multivariate analysis showed that advanced age, heart disease, and hyperlipidemia were associated with postoperative tachyarrhythmia. Hyponatremia, hypoalbuminemia, and leukocytosis on postoperative day 3 were significantly associated with tachyarrhythmia onset. The incidence of all complications and respiratory complications, including pneumonia, was significantly higher in patients with than in those without tachyarrhythmia. The mortality rate in the tachyarrhythmia group tended to be higher than that in the nontachyarrhythmia group. Landiolol as a treatment for tachyarrhythmia immediately decreased heart rate and safely reduced subsequent respiratory complications.

Conclusion

In elderly patients with cardiac disease or hyperlipidemia, surgeons should be alert for the occurrence of tachyarrhythmia after esophagectomy. Postoperative tachyarrhythmia is a marker of morbidities with particular emphasis on respiratory complications. However, it can be adequately managed by landiolol, resulting in fewer respiratory complications. Landiolol might be a safe and convenient agent for managing postoperative tachyarrhythmia after thoracoscopic esophagectomy, resulting in lower mortality and morbidity rates.