Effects of free fatty acids, growth hormone and growth hormone receptor blockade on serum ghrelin levels in humans

BACKGROUND: Circulating ghrelin levels are reported to be suppressed by insulin, GH and free fatty acids (FFAs). However, insulin, GH and FFA levels are all interdependent, and it is therefore difficult to delineate their independent effects on ghrelin secretion. OBJECTIVE: To isolate and define the impact of GH, GH receptor (GHR) blockade and intravenous FFA infusion on total circulating ghrelin levels during a hyperinsulinaemic glucose clamp with identical insulin levels. DESIGN: In a randomized design, eight healthy males each underwent an 8-h hyperinsulinaemic glucose clamp on four occasions together with either: (1) control (saline), (2) intravenous FFA infusion (intralipid/heparin infusion 4 h), (3) a GH bolus (0.5 mg i.v.) or (4) GHR blockade (pegvisomant, 30 mg s.c.). RESULTS: Hyperinsulinaemia per se resulted in a decrease in ghrelin concentrations of about 15%. During FFA exposure, ghrelin levels were suppressed by about 22% when compared with saline [area under the curve (AUC)(ghrelin0-240) 122.7 +/- 10.9 vs. 97.6 +/- 13.4 pg/ml/min, P = 0.001], followed by a rebound increase upon discontinuation of the infusion. Furthermore, average ghrelin concentration (AUC(ghrelin)) was significantly inversely correlated to average FFA levels (AUC(FFA)) (r = -0.33, P < 0.05). Neither GH administration nor GHR blockade resulted in significant alterations in total ghrelin levels in the presence of unaltered insulin and FFA levels. CONCLUSIONS: Elevation of FFAs by means of an intravenous infusion acutely suppresses ghrelin levels, whereas GH administration and GHR blockade have no detectable effect on ghrelin concentration when insulin and FFA levels are kept fixed.     

Free fatty acids decrease circulating ghrelin concentrations in humans

OBJECTIVE: Concentrations of the orexigenic peptide ghrelin is affected by a number of hormones, which also affect circulating levels of free fatty acids (FFAs). The present study was therefore designed to determine the direct effect of FFAs on circulating ghrelin. DESIGN: Eight lean, healthy men were examined for 8 h on four occasions using variable infusion rates (0, 3, 6 and 12 microl/kg per min) of intralipid to create different plasma FFA concentrations. Constant levels of insulin and GH were obtained by administration of acipimox (250 mg) and somatostatin (300 microg/h). At the end of each study day a hyperinsulinaemic-euglycaemic clamp was performed. RESULTS: Four distinct levels of FFAs were obtained at the end of the lipid infusion period (FFA(LIPID): 0.03 +/- 0.00 vs: 0.49 +/- 0.04, 0.92 +/- 0.08 and 2.09 +/- 0.38 mmol/l; ANOVA P < 0.0001) and during hyperinsulinaemia (FFA(LIPID+INSULIN): 0.02 +/- 0.00 vs: 0.34 +/- 0.03, 0.68 +/- 0.09 and 1.78 +/- 0.32 mmol/l; ANOVA P < 0.0001). Whereas, somatostatin infusion alone reduced ghrelin concentration by approximately 67%, concomitant administration of increasing amounts of intralipid reduced circulating ghrelin by a further 14, 19 and 19% respectively (change in ghrelin: 0.52 +/- 0.05 vs: 0.62 +/- 0.06, 0.72 +/- 0.09 and 0.71 +/- 0.05 microg/l; ANOVA P = 0.04). No further reduction in ghrelin concentration was observed during hyperinsulinaemia. CONCLUSION: FFA exposure between 0 and 1 mmol/l significantly suppresses ghrelin levels independent of ambient GH and insulin levels.     

Elevated insulin levels contribute to the reduced growth hormone (GH) response to GH-releasing hormone in obese subjects.

We have recently presented experimental evidence indicating that insulin has a physiologic inhibitory effect on growth hormone (GH) release in healthy humans. The aim of the present study was to determine whether in obesity, which is characterized by hyperinsulinemia and blunted GH release, insulin contributes to the GH defect. To this aim, we used a simplified experimental protocol previously used in healthy humans to isolate the effect of insulin by removing the interference of free fatty acids (FFAs), which are known to block GH release. Six obese subjects (four men and two women; age, 30.8 +/- 5.2 years; body mass index, 36.8 +/- 2.8 kg/m2 [mean +/- SE]) and six normal subjects (four men and two women; age, 25.8 +/- 1.9 years; body mass index, 22.7 +/- 1.1 kg/m2) received intravenous (i.v.) GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) 0.6 microg/kg under three experimental conditions: (1) i.v. 0.9% NaCl infusion and oral placebo, (2) i.v. 0.9% NaCl infusion and oral acipimox, an antilipolytic agent able to reduce FFA levels (250 mg at 6 and 2 hours before GHRH), and (3) euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp (insulin infusion rate, 0.4 mU x kg(-1) x min(-1)). As expected, after placebo, the GH response to GHRH was lower for obese subjects versus normals (488 +/- 139 v 1,755 +/- 412 microg/L x 120 min, P < .05). Acipimox markedly reduced FFA levels and produced a mild reduction of insulin levels; under these conditions, the GH response to GHRH was increased in both groups, remaining lower in obese versus normal subjects (1,842 +/- 360 v 4,871 +/- 1,286 microg/L x 120 min, P < .05). In both groups, insulin infusion yielded insulin levels usually observed under postprandial conditions and reduced circulating FFA to the levels observed after acipimox administration. Again, the GH response to GHRH was lower for obese subjects versus normals (380 +/- 40 v 1,075 +/- 206 microg/L x 120 min, P < .05), and in both groups, it was significantly lower than the corresponding response after acipimox. In obese subjects, as previously reported in normals, the GH response to GHRH was inversely correlated with the mean serum insulin (r = -.70, P < .01). In conclusion, our data indicate that in the obese, as in normal subjects, the GH response to GHRH is a function of insulin levels. The finding that after both the acipimox treatment and the insulin clamp the obese still show higher insulin levels and a lower GH response to GHRH than normal subjects suggests that hyperinsulinemia is a major determinant of the reduced GH release associated with obesity.     

Effect of acute reduction of free fatty acids by acipimox on growth hormone-releasing hormone-induced GH secretion in type 1 diabetic patients

BACKGROUND: In type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM1), high GH basal levels and exaggerated responses to several stimuli have been described. Acipimox is an antilipolytic drug that produces an acute reduction of free fatty acids (FFA). The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the reduction of plasma FFA with acipimox, alone or in combination with GHRH, on GH secretion in DM1. METHODS: Six type 1 diabetic patients were studied (three women, three men), mean age of 30 +/- 2.1 years, body mass index (BMI) 23.1 +/- 1.5 kg/m2. As a control group, six normal healthy subjects of similar age, sex and weight were studied. Each patient and control received GHRH [1 microg/kg intravenously (i.v.) at min 180], acipimox (250 mg orally at min 0 and 120) and GHRH plus acipimox on three separated days. Subjects served as their own control. Blood samples were taken at appropriate intervals for determination of GH, FFA and glucose. RESULT: In control subjects, the GH area under the curve (AUC; microg/l x 120 min) was for acipimox-treated 1339 +/- 292 and 1528 +/- 330 for GHRH-induced secretion. The GH AUC after the administration of GHRH plus acipimox was 3031 +/- 669, significantly greater than the response after acipimox alone (P<0.05) or GHRH alone (P<0.05). In diabetic patients, the GH AUC was for acipimox-treated 2516 +/- 606 and 1821 +/- 311 for GHRH-induced secretion. The GH AUC after the administration of GHRH plus acipimox was 7311 +/- 1154, significantly greater than the response after acipimox alone (P<0.05) or GHRH alone (P<0.05). The GH response after acipimox was increased in diabetic when compared with normal (P<0.05), with a GH AUC of 1339 +/- 292 and 2515 +/- 606 for normal subjects and diabetic patients, respectively. The GH response after acipimox plus GHRH was increased in diabetic when compared with normal (P<0.05), with a GH AUC of 3031 +/- 669 and 7311 +/- 1154 for normal subjects and diabetic patients, respectively. The administration of acipimox induced a FFA reduction during the entire test. CONCLUSIONS: Reduction of free fatty acids with acipimox is a stimulus for GH secretion in DM1. The combined administration of GHRH plus acipimox induces a markedly increased GH secretion in type 1 diabetic patients when compared with normal subjects. These data suggest that patients with DM1 exhibit a greater GH secretory capacity than control subjects, despite the fact that endogenous FFA levels seems to exert a greater inhibitory effect on GH secretion in these patients.     

Inhibition of lipolysis during acute GH exposure increases insulin sensitivity in previously untreated GH-deficient adults

OBJECTIVE: Previous studies evaluating the lipolytic effect of GH have in general been performed in subjects on chronic GH therapy. In this study we assessed the lipolytic effect of GH in previously untreated patients and examined whether the negative effect of enhanced lipolysis on glucose metabolism could be counteracted by acute antilipolysis achieved with acipimox. METHODS: Ten GH-deficient (GHD) adults participated in four experiments each, during which they received in a double-blind manner: placebo (A); GH (0.88+/-0.13 mg) (B); GH+acipimox 250 mg b.i.d. (C); and acipimox b.i.d. (no GH) (D), where GH was given the night before a 2 h euglycemic, hyperinsulinemic clamp combined with infusion of [3-(3)H]glucose and indirect calorimetry. RESULTS: GH increased basal free fatty acid (FFA) levels by 74% (P=0.0051) and insulin levels by 93% (P=0.0051). This resulted in a non-significant decrease in insulin-stimulated glucose uptakes (16.61+/-8.03 vs 12.74+/-5.50 micromol/kg per min (s.d.), P=0.07 for A vs B). The rates of insulin-stimulated glucose uptake correlated negatively with the FFA concentrations (r=-0.638, P<0.0001). However, acipimox caused a significant improvement in insulin-stimulated glucose uptake in the GH-treated patients (17.35+/-5.65 vs 12.74+/-5.50 micromol/kg per min, P=0.012 for C vs B). The acipimox-induced enhancement of insulin-stimulated glucose uptake was mainly due to an enhanced rate of glucose oxidation (8.32+/-3.00 vs 5.88+/-2.39 micromol/kg per min, P=0.07 for C vs B). The enhanced rates of glucose oxidation induced by acipimox correlated negatively with the rate of lipid oxidation in GH-treated subjects both in basal (r=-0.867, P=0.0093) and during insulin-stimulated (r=-0.927, P=0.0054) conditions. GH did not significantly impair non-oxidative glucose metabolism (6.86+/-5.22 vs 8.67+/-6.65 micromol/kg per min, P=NS for B vs A). The fasting rate of endogenous glucose production was unaffected by GH and acipimox administration (10.99+/-1.98 vs 11.73+/-2.38 micromol/kg per min, P=NS for B vs A and 11.55+/-2.7 vs 10.99+/-1.98 micromol/kg per min, P=NS for C vs B). On the other hand, acipimox alone improved glucose uptake in the untreated GHD patients (24.14+/-8.74 vs 16.61+/-8.03 micromol/kg per min, P=0.0077 for D vs A) and this was again due to enhanced fasting (7.90+/-2.68 vs 5.16+/-2.28 micromol/kg per min, P=0.01 for D vs A) and insulin-stimulated (9.78+/-3.68 vs 7.95+/-2.64 micromol/kg per min, P=0.07 for D vs A) glucose oxidation. CONCLUSION: The study of acute administration of GH to previously untreated GHD patients provides compelling evidence that (i) GH-induced insulin resistance is mainly due to induction of lipolysis by GH; and (ii) inhibition of lipolysis can prevent the deterioration of insulin sensitivity. The question remains whether GH replacement therapy should, at least at the beginning of therapy, be combined with means to prevent an excessive stimulation of lipolysis by GH.     

The nicotinic acid analogue acipimox increases plasma leptin and decreases free fatty acids in type 2 diabetic patients

The effect of 3 days of intensive treatment with acipimox, an antilipolytic nicotinic acid derivative, on plasma leptin levels was studied in eight patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study. Acipimox reduced plasma free fatty acids (FFA) markedly and lowered plasma triglycerides, glucose and insulin. Plasma leptin levels were elevated in all eight patients during 3 days of acipimox treatment (mean increase+/-s.e.: 2.38+/-0.57ng/ml, P<0.005) and the 24h mean effect of acipimox on leptin levels increased during the experimental period (P<0.03). The effect on plasma insulin and glucose resembled a mirror image of the effect on plasma leptin during 3 days of treatment. The suggestion that leptin mediates insulin resistance and may be involved in the development of the diabetic syndrome cannot be supported by the present results. It has been reported that FFA stimulates leptin secretion. Surprisingly, despite a markedly reduced FFA level, leptin concentration increased in the present study. We suggest that a primary acipimox effect is to increase leptin secretion, and that this prevails over the reduced FFA stimulus.     

Acute effects of ghrelin on insulin secretion and glucose disposal rate in gastrectomized patients

CONTEXT: Plasma ghrelin concentration is diminished in gastrectomized patients. Acute ghrelin administration reduces insulin secretion, whereas insulin infusion has been shown to decrease ghrelin levels. Whether ghrelin has any effect on glucose utilization in humans is unknown. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to reveal the effect of ghrelin on insulin-mediated glucose disposal in gastrectomized patients. STUDY AND SETTING: We conducted a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, hospital-based study. PATIENTS: Seven men and three women who all had a previous total gastrectomy and truncal vagotomy entered and completed the study. Intervention: Each individual received infusion of saline alone or saline with ghrelin (5.0 pmol/kg.min) during a 5-h hyperinsulinemic (80 mU/m(2).min) euglycemic clamp on 2 separate days. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We assessed glucose disposal rate and concentrations of C-peptide, ghrelin, GH, IGF-I, IGF-binding protein (IGFBP)-3 and -1, cortisol, leptin, and adiponectin. RESULTS: Glucose disposal rate decreased during ghrelin infusion (control study 8.6 +/- 0.2 vs. 7.2 +/- 0.1 mg/kg.min P < 0.001). In experiments with saline infusion, levels of ghrelin (P < 0.001), C-peptide (P < 0.001), glucagon (P < 0.001), adiponectin (P = 0.005), cortisol (P = 0.012), IGF-I (P < 0.001), IGFBP-3 (P = 0.038), and IGFBP-1 (P = 0.001) fell in response to euglycemic hyperinsulinemia. GH concentration maintained at baseline, whereas leptin significantly rose (P < 0.001). In the ghrelin infusion study, the plateau level of ghrelin concentration (6963.6 +/- 212.9 pg/ml) was maintained from 90 min throughout the experiment. GH (P < 0.001) and cortisol (P = 0.04) concentrations rose, whereas C-peptide levels were more suppressed than in the control study (P < 0.001). Other hormones and IGFBPs changed similarly as in the study with saline infusion. CONCLUSION: It appears that ghrelin might be involved in the negative control of insulin secretion and glucose consumption in gastrectomized patients, at least after acute administration.     

The control on growth hormone release by free fatty acids is maintained in acromegaly

Free fatty acids (FFA) physiologically regulate GH release via a negative feedback. The aim of this study was to examine whether such feedback is preserved in acromegaly, a condition in which alterations in other regulatory mechanisms of GH release occur. Eight acromegalic patients (group 1: five women and three men, 43.0 +/- 4.2 yr old, mean +/- SE) received per os on two different days, at a 3 day-interval, in a random order, placebo or 250 mg of acipimox, an inhibitor of lipolysis analogous to nicotinic acid, at 0700 and 1100 h. In both tests GHRH (1-29 NH2), 50 microg, was administered i.v. at 1300 h. Blood samples for GH, FFA, immunoreactive insulin (IRI), and glucose were taken from 0900 to 1500 h, and the time period considered for statistical analysis was 1200-1500 h, representative of steady-state condition for FFA, IRI, and glucose. Mean plasma FFA levels (1200-1500 h) were significantly lower after acipimox than after placebo (0.05 +/- 0.01 vs. 0.17 +/- 0.01 g/L, P < 0.01). In contrast, both mean basal GH levels (1200-1300 h) and the mean GH response to GHRH (GH delta area, 1300-1500 h) were significantly higher after acipimox than after placebo (12.0 +/- 1.9 vs. 7.8 +/- 1.2 microg/L, P < 0.01; 2937 +/- 959 vs. 1154 +/- 432 microg/L x 120 min, P < 0.01). The increase in both basal GH levels and GH delta area occurred in all eight patients. Acipimox also reduced mean serum IRI (83 +/- 12 vs. 112 +/- 14 pmol/L) and blood glucose (5.1 +/- 0.1 vs. 5.7 +/- 0.1 mmol/L) levels, as compared with placebo (P < 0.03 or less). Eight acromegalic patients (group 2: six women and two men, 46.6 +/- 5.7 yr old) underwent a constant i.v. 10% lipid infusion (150 mL/h), started at 0900 h and continued until 1500 h. Mean plasma FFA levels (1200-1500 h) were significantly higher during lipid infusion than after placebo (0.27 +/- 0.01 vs. 0.16 +/- 0.01 g/L, P < 0.02); in contrast, mean basal GH levels (1200-1300 h) were reduced by lipid infusion, as compared with placebo (9.9 +/- 3.1 vs. 16.6 +/- 4.4 microg/L, P < 0.01), and the same occurred for the GH delta area after GHRH (2498 +/- 1643 vs. 4512 +/- 1988 microg/L x 120 min, P < 0.01). Serum IRI and blood glucose levels were similar after placebo and during lipid infusion. These data indicate that, in acromegaly, the acute reduction of circulating FFA levels results in increased GH release, whereas the increase in circulating FFA levels is accompanied by a reduced GH release. Taken together, these findings suggest that, in acromegaly, the control of FFA on GH release is preserved.     

Effects of growth hormone (GH) on ghrelin, leptin, and adiponectin in GH-deficient patients

Ghrelin is a recently discovered gastric peptide that increases appetite, glucose oxidation, and lipogenesis and stimulates the secretion of GH. In contrast to ghrelin, GH promotes lipolysis, glucose production, and insulin secretion. Both ghrelin and GH are suppressed by intake of nutrients, especially glucose. The role of GH in the regulation of ghrelin has not yet been established. We investigated the effect of GH on circulating levels of ghrelin in relation to its effects on glucose, insulin, body composition, and the adipocyte-derived peptides leptin and adiponectin. Thirty-six patients with adult-onset GH deficiency received recombinant human GH for 9 months in a placebo-controlled study. Body composition and fasting serum analytes were assessed at baseline and at the end of the study. The GH treatment was accompanied by increased serum levels of IGF-I, reduced body weight (-2%) and body fat (-27%), and increased serum concentrations of glucose (+10%) and insulin (+48%). Ghrelin levels decreased in 30 of 36 subjects by a mean of -29%, and leptin decreased by a mean of -24%. Adiponectin increased in the women only. The decreases in ghrelin and leptin correlated with changes in fat mass, fat-free mass, and IGF-I. The reductions in ghrelin were predicted independently of the changes in IGF-I and fat mass. It is likely that the reductions in ghrelin and leptin reflect the metabolic effects of GH on lipid mobilization and glucose production. Possibly, a suppression of ghrelin promotes loss of body fat in GH-deficient patients receiving treatment. The observed correlation between the changes in ghrelin and IGF-I may suggest that the GH/IGF-I axis has a negative feedback on ghrelin secretion.     

Sustained reduction in plasma free fatty acid concentration improves insulin action without altering plasma adipocytokine levels in subjects with strong family history of type 2 diabetes

To investigate the effect of a sustained (7-d) decrease in plasma free fatty acid (FFA) concentration in individuals genetically predisposed to develop type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), we studied the effect of acipimox, a potent inhibitor of lipolysis, on insulin action and adipocytokine concentrations in eight normal glucose-tolerant subjects (aged 40 +/- 4 yr, body mass index 26.5 +/- 0.8 kg/m(2)) with at least two first-degree relatives with T2DM. Subjects received an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and 120 min euglycemic insulin clamp (80 mU/m(2).min) with 3-[(3)H] glucose to quantitate rates of insulin-mediated whole-body glucose disposal (Rd) and endogenous (primarily hepatic) glucose production (EGP) before and after acipimox, 250 mg every 6 h for 7 d. Acipimox significantly reduced fasting plasma FFA (515 +/- 64 to 285 +/- 58 microm, P < 0.05) and mean plasma FFA during the OGTT (263 +/- 32 to 151 +/- 25 microm, P < 0.05); insulin-mediated suppression of plasma FFA concentration during the insulin clamp also was enhanced (162 +/- 18 to 120 +/- 15 microm, P < 0.10). Following acipimox, fasting plasma glucose (5.1 +/- 0.1 vs. 5.2 +/- 0.1 mm) did not change, whereas mean plasma glucose during the OGTT decreased (7.6 +/- 0.5 to 6.9 +/- 0.5 mm, P < 0.01) without change in mean plasma insulin concentration (402 +/- 90 to 444 +/- 102 pmol/liter). After acipimox Rd increased from 5.6 +/- 0.5 to 6.8 +/- 0.5 mg/kg.min (P < 0.01) due to an increase in insulin-stimulated nonoxidative glucose disposal (2.5 +/- 0.4 to 3.5 +/- 0.4 mg/kg.min, P < 0.05). The increment in Rd correlated closely with the decrement in fasting plasma FFA concentration (r = -0.80, P < 0.02). Basal EGP did not change after acipimox (1.9 +/- 0.1 vs. 2.0 +/- 0.1 mg/kg.min), but insulin-mediated suppression of EGP improved (0.22 +/- 0.09 to 0.01 +/- 0.01 mg/kg.min, P < 0.05). EGP during the insulin clamp correlated positively with the fasting plasma FFA concentration (r = 0.49, P = 0.06) and the mean plasma FFA concentration during the insulin clamp (r = 0.52, P < 0.05). Plasma adiponectin (7.1 +/- 1.0 to 7.2 +/- 1.1 microg/ml), resistin (4.0 +/- 0.3 to 3.8 +/- 0.3 ng/ml), IL-6 (1.4 +/- 0.3 to 1.6 +/- 0.4 pg/ml), and TNFalpha (2.3 +/- 0.3 to 2.4 +/- 0.3 pg/ml) did not change after acipimox treatment.We concluded that sustained reduction in plasma FFA concentration in subjects with a strong family history of T2DM increases peripheral (muscle) and hepatic insulin sensitivity without increasing adiponectin levels or altering the secretion of other adipocytokines by the adipocyte. These results suggest that lipotoxicity already is well established in individuals who are genetically predisposed to develop T2DM and that drugs that cause a sustained reduction in the elevated plasma FFA concentration may represent an effective modality for the prevention of T2DM in high-risk, genetically predisposed, normal glucose-tolerant individuals despite the lack of an effect on adipocytokine concentrations.     

Ghrelin, a natural GH secretagogue produced by the stomach, induces hyperglycemia and reduces insulin secretion in humans

Ghrelin, a 28 amino acid gastric hormone is a natural ligand of the GH Secretagogue (GHS) receptor (GHS-R) and strongly stimulates GH secretion though, like synthetic GHS, it shows other endocrine and non-endocrine activities. Aim of the present study was to clarify whether ghrelin administration influences insulin and glucose levels in humans. To this goal, we compared the effects of ghrelin, hexarelin, a synthetic GHS, or placebo on insulin and glucose as well as on GH levels in 11 normal young volunteers (age [mean +/- SEM]: 28.5 +/- 3.1 yr; BMI: 22.2 +/- 0.9 Kg/m(2)). Ghrelin induced very marked increase in GH secretion (DeltaAUC(0-180): 5777.1 +/- 812.6 microg/l/h; p < 0.01) which was not modified by placebo. Placebo administration did not modify insulin and glucose levels. On the other hand, ghrelin administration induced a prompt increase in glucose levels (DeltaAUC(0-180): 1343.1 +/- 443.5 mg/dl/h; p < 0.01 vs. saline). Absolute glucose levels at +15' were already higher than those at baseline (93.9 +/- 7.1 mg/dl; p < 0.01) and persisted elevated up to 165' (90.3 +/- 5.8 mg/dl; p < 0.01 vs. 0'). Ghrelin administration was also followed by a decrease in serum insulin levels (DeltaAUC(0-180): -207.1 +/- 70.5 mU/l/h; p < 0.05 vs. saline). Absolute insulin levels were significantly reduced from 30' (11.4 +/- 0.9 mU/l, p < 0.1 vs. 0'), showed the nadir at +45' (10.0 +/- 0.6 mU/l, p < 0.01 vs. 0') and then persisted lower (p < 0.01) than baseline up to +105'. Hexarelin administration did not modify glucose and insulin levels despite its marked GH-releasing effect (DeltaAUC(0-180): 4156.8 +/- 1180.3 microg/l/h; p < 0.01 vs. saline) that was slightly lower (p < 0.05) than that of ghrelin. In conclusion, these findings show that, besides stimulating GH secretion, ghrelin is a gastric hormone possessing metabolic actions such as hyperglycemic effect and lowering effect on insulin secretion in humans, at least after acute administration.     

Acute stimulation of leptin concentrations in humans during hyperglycemic hyperinsulinemia. Influence of free fatty acids and fasting

OBJECTIVE: To assess the acute regulation of leptin concentrations by insulin, glucose and free fatty acids (FFAs). DESIGN: Four protocols: saline control experiment (CON); hyperglycemic clamps (approximately 8.3 mmol/l, 120 min) after an overnight fast (12 FAST); after a 36 h fast (36 FAST); and after a 36 h fast during which Intralipid/heparin was given over the last 24 h (36 FAST+FFA). SUBJECTS: Lean, young, healthy volunteers; control group (n=6), experimental group (n=6). MEASUREMENTS: Serum leptin concentrations. RESULTS: Glucose and insulin concentrations were similar during the three clamp protocols. Average FFAs during the last 60 min of the clamp were 671+/-68 microM (CON),109+/-15 microM (12 FAST), 484+/-97 microM (36 FAST) and 1762+/-213 microM (36 FAST+FFA). Leptin concentrations decreased similarly during 36 FAST and 36 FAST+FFA. Leptin concentrations at 120 min (expressed as percentage of mean basal value) were 0.82+/-0.02 (CON), 0.93+/-0.08 (12 FAST) (P=0.29), 1.19+/-0.06 (36 FAST) (P<0.01) and 1.44+/-0.12 (36 FAST+FFA) (P<0.01). CONCLUSION: During a one-day fast leptin concentrations decrease regardless of maintainance of an isocaloric balance. During acute hyperinsulinemic hyperglycemia leptin concentrations increase only after a preceding fast. This increase was most pronounced during simultaneous elevation of FFAs. Overall, our findings are compatible with the hypothesis that leptin secretion may be coupled to triglyceride synthesis rather than to the absolute lipid content of the adipocyte. International Journal of Obesity (2001) 25, 138-142     

Different effects of short- and long-term recombinant hGH administration on ghrelin and adiponectin levels in GH-deficient adults

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate circulating levels of ghrelin and adiponectin (ApN) in GH-deficient (GHD) adults before and after short- and long-term recombinant human GH (rhGH) administration. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-three patients were studied. Seventeen subjects (Group A, 12 men, five women) were evaluated at baseline and after 1 year rhGH therapy (dose mean +/- SD: 0.3 +/- 0.1 mg/day) with the assessment of serum IGF-I, ghrelin, ApN, leptin, insulin and glucose levels, percentage of body fat (BF%), HOMA-IR and QUICKI. Seventeen age-, sex- and body mass index (BMI)-matched healthy subjects were recruited for comparisons. Six patients (Group B, three men, three women) underwent IGF-I generation test (rhGH 0.025 mg/kg/day for 7 days), blood sampled at baseline and on day 8 for determination of IGF-I, ghrelin and ApN levels. RESULTS: Group A: at baseline GHD patients showed low IGF-I levels and BF% significantly higher than controls (31.4 +/- 2.5 vs. 26.4 +/- 1.3, P < 0.05). Glucose, insulin, leptin, tryglicerides, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels, as well as HOMA-IR and QUICKI values were similar in the two series, while total cholesterol levels were higher in GHD. In GHD, ghrelin levels were significantly lower than in controls (193.9 +/- 27.1 vs. 298.1 +/- 32.5 pmol/l, respectively, P = 0.02), while ApN levels were similar (10.2 +/- 1.1 and 9 +/- 1 mg/l, respectively, P = ns). After 1 year of rhGH therapy, BF%, BMI, serum total and LDL cholesterol significantly decreased, serum leptin levels showed a trend to decrease, while HOMA-IR and QUICKI did not change. Ghrelin and ApN levels significantly increased from 193.9 +/- 27.1 to 232.4 +/- 26.3 pmol/l (P < 0.01) and from 8.6 +/- 0.8 to 10.3 +/- 1.1 mg/l (P < 0.05), respectively. In group B, the expected increase in IGF-I levels was associated with a significant decrease in ghrelin levels, while ApN did not change. CONCLUSION: GHD patients showed serum ghrelin lower than controls, probably due to the higher BF%. No difference in ApN was observed. Ghrelin and ApN increments induced by long-term treatment may be related to the significant BMI and BF% reduction that is the predominant metabolic effect of rhGH therapy. Conversely, the decrease in ghrelin levels observed after short-term rhGH administration may be consistent with an inhibitory feedback of GH and/or IGF-I on ghrelin release.     

The effect of long-term pharmacological antilipolysis on substrate metabolism in growth hormone (GH)-substituted GH-deficient adults

The lipolytic properties of GH are essential for the acute effects on glucose metabolism and insulin sensitivity, whereas its more long-term impact on substrate metabolism is uncertain. The aim of the study was to evaluate the influence of pharmacological antilipolysis on substrate metabolism during constant and continued GH exposure. Seven adult GH-deficient (GHD) patients were studied twice in a double-blind randomized order: 1) after 4 wk of acipimox treatment (250 mg, orally, three times daily) and 2) after 4 wk of placebo treatment. Daily GH replacement was continued throughout both study periods. At the end of each period glucose and lipid oxidation rates were assessed by indirect calorimetry, and the protein oxidation rate was estimated by urinary excretion of urea. Endogenous glucose production and whole body protein metabolism were assessed by isotope dilution techniques using tritiated glucose and stable phenylalanine and tyrosine isotopes, respectively. GH and IGF-I levels were not different between periods, whereas FFA and glycerol levels were distinctly suppressed after 4 wk of pharmacological antilipolysis [FFA, 256 +/- 63 (acipimox) vs. 596 +/- 69 (placebo) micromol/liter; P = 0.001]. Likewise, plasma levels of total and low density lipoprotein cholesterol as well as triglycerides were significantly reduced after acipimox. Despite this, lipid oxidation rates were identical at the end of the two treatment periods [589 +/- 106 (acipimox) vs. 626 +/- 111 (placebo) kcal/24 h; P = 0.698]. The total and oxidative rates of glucose as well as protein oxidation and urea excretion were identical at the end of the two treatment periods (P > 0.05). Phenylalanine flux, a measure of protein turnover, was increased [34.62 +/- 1.83 (acipimox) vs. 33.15 +/- 1.61 (placebo) micromol/kg.h; P = 0.049] as was phenylalanine incorporation into protein, a measure of protein synthesis [30.79 +/- 1.67 (acipimox) vs. 28.97 +/- 1.51 (placebo) micromol/kg.h; P = 0.035]. The following conclusions were reached: 1) prolonged antilipolysis by means of acipimox stimulates protein turnover without affecting net protein balance; and 2) acipimox in combination with constant GH exposure results in sustained suppression of circulating levels of FFA, glycerol, and triglycerides without a reduction in the rate of lipid oxidation. The site and origin of lipid fuels for oxidation during suppression of lipolysis remain to be determined.     

Acute effects of ghrelin administration on glucose and lipid metabolism

CONTEXT: Ghrelin infusion increases plasma glucose and nonesterified fatty acids, but it is uncertain whether this is secondary to the concomitant release of GH. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to study direct effects of ghrelin on substrate metabolism. DESIGN: This was a randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled two-period crossover study. SETTING: The study was performed in a university clinical research laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Eight healthy men aged 27.2 +/- 0.9 yr with a body mass index of 23.4 +/- 0.5 kg/m(2) were included in the study. INTERVENTION: Subjects received infusion of ghrelin (5 pmol x kg(-1) x min(-1)) or placebo for 5 h together with a pancreatic clamp (somatostatin 330 microg x h(-1), insulin 0.1 mU x kg(-1) x min(-1), GH 2 ng x kg(-1) x min(-1), and glucagon 0.5 ng.kg(-1) x min(-1)). A hyperinsulinemic (0.6 mU x kg(-1) x min(-1)) euglycemic clamp was performed during the final 2 h of each infusion. RESULTS: Basal and insulin-stimulated glucose disposal decreased with ghrelin [basal: 1.9 +/- 0.1 (ghrelin) vs. 2.3 +/- 0.1 mg x kg(-1) x min(-1), P = 0.03; clamp: 3.9 +/- 0.6 (ghrelin) vs. 6.1 +/- 0.5 mg x kg(-1) x min(-1), P = 0.02], whereas endogenous glucose production was similar. Glucose infusion rate during the clamp was reduced by ghrelin [4.0 +/- 0.7 (ghrelin) vs. 6.9 +/- 0.9 mg.kg(-1) x min(-1); P = 0.007], whereas nonesterified fatty acid flux increased [131 +/- 26 (ghrelin) vs. 69 +/- 5 micromol/min; P = 0.048] in the basal period. Regional lipolysis (skeletal muscle, sc fat) increased insignificantly with ghrelin infusion. Energy expenditure during the clamp decreased after ghrelin infusion [1539 +/- 28 (ghrelin) vs. 1608 +/- 32 kcal/24 h; P = 0.048], but the respiratory quotient did not differ. Minor but significant elevations in serum levels of GH and cortisol were observed after ghrelin infusion. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of exogenous ghrelin causes insulin resistance in muscle and stimulates lipolysis; these effects are likely to be direct, although a small contribution of GH and cortisol cannot be excluded.     

Effects of short-term exercise and energy surplus on hormones related to regulation of energy balance

Energy surplus raises circulating concentrations of leptin and insulin while lowering plasma ghrelin. Exercise has the opposite effects. The purpose of this study was to determine whether exercise counters the hormonal effects of energy surplus independent of changes in energy balance. To do that, we assessed plasma concentrations of leptin, insulin, and ghrelin at baseline, after overfeeding, and after overfeeding plus exercise. Baseline (B) leptin and insulin concentrations and ghrelin area under the curve were measured during an oral glucose challenge in 9 healthy, active subjects (6 male, 3 female) after 2 days in energy balance without exercise. Measurements were repeated after subjects were overfed by +3213 +/- 849 kJ/d for 3 more sedentary days (OF). In the third condition, the same net energy surplus (+3125 +/- 933 kJ/d) was generated for 24 hours by doubling the overfeeding (+6284 +/- 1669 kJ/d) and countering it with a bout of exercise (expenditure = 3063 +/- 803 kJ); and measurements were made the next day (OF + EX). Compared with B, leptin went up (5.8 +/- 8.2 to 7.6 +/- 10.6 ng/mL) after OF, but was not significantly higher after OF + EX (7.1 +/- 10.2 ng/mL). Compared with B, insulin was +36% and +43% higher after OF and OF + EX, respectively. In contrast, ghrelin area under the curve did not change after OF but was significantly lower (-14%) than B or OF after OF + EX (indicating greater suppression). These data suggest that the effect of short-term exercise on fasting leptin and insulin depends on energy balance but the ghrelin response may be partially mediated by effects of exercise independent of energy balance.     

Insulin mediated inhibition of hormone sensitive lipase activity in vivo in relation to endogenous catecholamines in healthy subjects

The regulation of hormone-sensitive lipase activity in vivo has not been studied in detail before. We have performed noninvasive in vivo tests to measure hormone-sensitive lipase activity under high plasma levels of endogenous insulin and catecholamines. For this purpose, two mental stress tests were carried out at random in 13 healthy volunteers. The subjects ingested 200 ml of a placebo solution or 20% glucose, followed by 1 h of rest, 20 min of mental stress, and 40 min of rest. Twenty minutes after the ingestion of glucose, insulin levels increased from 6.8 +/- 1.6 to a maximum of 30.5 +/- 4.8 mU/liter (P < 0.01), whereas the increase in insulin was significantly less after placebo (from 5.7 +/- 0.9 to 9.5 +/- 1.5 mU/liter; P < 0.01). The increase in heart rate, as an estimate of the amount of stress, was similar in both tests (12% increase). During stress, plasma norepinephrine and epinephrine concentrations increased by 24% and 44%, respectively, after glucose and by 4% and 21%, respectively, after placebo (n = 6). Fasting plasma FFA were similar in both tests (placebo, 0.35 +/- 0.07 mM; glucose, 0.46 +/- 0.08 mM). Forty minutes after ingestion of placebo, plasma FFA concentrations decreased to 0.27 +/- 0.07 mM, compared with a stronger suppression to 0.11 +/- 0.02 mM after ingestion of glucose (P < 0.01). By 10 min after mental stress, plasma FFA concentrations increased by 53% after placebo (P < 0.01), in contrast to unchanged FFA concentrations after ingestion of glucose. Taken together, these results suggest that the suppression of hormone-sensitive lipase by endogenous insulin in healthy, insulin-sensitive subjects is stronger than the stimulation by endogenous catecholamines.     

Effect of acute pharmacological modulation of plasma free fatty acids on GH secretion in acromegalic patients

OBJECTIVES: In acromegaly GH secretion is markedly increased due in most cases to a GH secreting pituitary adenoma. GH secretion is modulated by variations in the levels of free fatty acids (FFA). Recent studies in different clinical situations, have shown that reduction in FFA with acipimox (A) modifies somatotroph cell responsiveness. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of acute pharmacological reduction of plasma FFA on both basal GH levels and GHRH-mediated GH secretion in acromegalic patients. PATIENTS: Six acromegalic patients (four female, two male) aged 57 +/- 4 years., with active disease due to pituitary adenomas were studied. Four of the patients had been treated previously by surgery and/or radiotherapy. The diagnosis of active acromegaly was established by clinical assessment, increased serum IGF-I and impaired GH suppression after oral glucose. MEASUREMENTS: Four tests were performed: placebo, A (250 mg, orally, - 210 minutes and - 60 minutes), GHRH (100 microg, iv, 0 minutes) and GHRH plus A. The different tests on each subject were performed in random order one week apart, each subject served as their own control. Serum GH was measured by RIA at appropriate intervals. The area under the curve (AUC) was calculated by the trapezoidal METHOD: Statistical analysis was performed by Wilcoxon test. P < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: The administration of A induced a FFA reduction during the entire test both when administered with placebo and with GHRH: AUC (mmol/l x 90 minutes): placebo plus placebo: 88.2 +/- 7.3. Placebo plus A: 23.2 +/- 4.6 (P < 0.05). Placebo plus GHRH: 85.4 +/- 6.9. A plus GHRH: 21.8 +/- 3.8 (P < 0.05). Mean peak GH level (microg/l) after placebo plus placebo was 5.0 +/- 1.8 not significantly different than after placebo plus A with a mean peak of 6.2 +/- 2 (P = ns). Mean peak GHRH-induced GH secretion was 26.0 +/- 15.4 and was not modified by previous A administration with mean peak of 24.4 +/- 11.8 (P = ns). CONCLUSIONS: In acromegalic patients acute pharmacological reduction of FFA with acipimox did not modify basal GH levels or GHRH-induced GH secretion, suggesting that the adenomatous somatotroph cell is unresponsive to physiological signals such as FFA which act at a pituitary level. These data support the hypothesis of an intrinsic neoplastic pituitary defect for the pathogenesis of acromegaly.     

Effect of acipimox, a lipid lowering drug, on growth hormone (GH) response to GH-releasing hormone in normal subjects

Growth hormone (GH) induces lipolysis and an increase of free fatty acids (FFA), and FFA inhibit the GH response to arginine and to GH-releasing hormone (GHRH). The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the pharmacologic blockade of lipolysis on the GH response to GHRH. Eleven normal men underwent a saline infusion starting at 09:00 h, after administration of placebo or 500 mg acipimox, an antilipolytic agent; at 13:00 h (0 min) they received GHRH, 50 micrograms iv The GH response to GHRH (0 to 120 min) was significantly higher in subjects pretreated with acipimox than in subjects pretreated with placebo. In subjects receiving placebo, but not in those receiving acipimox, a progressive increase of plasma FFA levels took place, and the GH response to GHRH was inversely related to the plasma FFA levels at 0 min. These data indicate that FFA play an important role in the control of GH release, and that acipimox prevents the FFA rise induced by GH.     

Circulating ghrelin levels in basal conditions and during glucose tolerance test in acromegalic patients

BACKGROUND: Ghrelin exerts a wide range of metabolic functions. In contrast to the body of information accumulated on the role of ghrelin on energy balance, the possible relevance of the peptide on GH secretion in physiological and pathological conditions has so far been poorly investigated. AIM: The aim of the present study was to evaluate circulating ghrelin levels in acromegalic patients in basal conditions and in response to oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). PATIENTS: Serum ghrelin, insulin and leptin levels were measured in 31 healthy normal weight subjects as controls, 25 patients with simple obesity and 17 non-diabetic acromegalic patients. Ghrelin and insulin response to OGTT was evaluated in six controls, four obese and six acromegalic patients. RESULTS: The acromegalic patients showed ghrelin levels lower than those observed in normal weight subjects (201+/-20 vs 329+/-32 pmol/l, P<0.05) and similar to those found in obese subjects (165+/-14 pmol/l, P=not significant). Both obese and acromegalic patients had insulin levels significantly higher than controls, while high levels of leptin were detected only in obese subjects. Serum ghrelin levels showed a significant negative correlation with insulin, leptin and body mass index (P<0.05) in normal and obese subjects. No correlation was observed in acromegalic patients, although those with severe insulin resistance showed the lowest ghrelin values (161+/-20 pmol/l). In controls and obese subjects, ghrelin levels showed a significant decrease (25-40%) during OGTT, while no effect was detectable in acromegalic patients. CONCLUSIONS: This study reports that patients with active acromegaly show low levels of circulating ghrelin that are not further reduced by OGTT, this pattern of secretion probably depending on both GH-induced insulin resistance and the putative GH/IGF-I negative feedback control on ghrelin secretion.