Meningococcal B vaccination coverage among older adolescents in the United States

BackgroundSerogroup B meningococcal (MenB) vaccination recommendations for adolescents in the United States (US) include routine vaccination for all individuals at increased risk and vaccination for individuals not at increased risk aged 16–23 years (preferred age 16–18 years) based on shared clinical decision-making. The two licensed MenB vaccines require administration of ≥2 doses.MethodsThis cross-sectional study analyzed 2017–2018 National Immunization Survey-Teen (NIS-Teen) data to evaluate ≥1 dose and ≥2 dose MenB vaccination coverage among adolescents aged 17 years. Multivariable logistic regression was used to further evaluate determinants of MenB vaccination.ResultsNationally, MenB vaccination coverage among 17-year-olds increased from 14.5% in 2017 to 17.2% in 2018 for ≥1 dose and from 6.3% to 8.4% for ≥2 doses. MenB vaccination coverage (2017–2018) was the lowest in the South (≥1 dose: 14.6%; ≥2 doses: 6.3%) and highest in the Northeast region (18.3% and 9.3%), with variation observed by census division. Adolescents were more likely to have received ≥1 dose of MenB vaccine if they had any Medicaid insurance (odds ratio [OR], 1.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.32–2.39) or had received human papillomavirus (OR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.41–2.67) or meningococcal A, C, W, and Y (OR, 4.03; 95% CI, 2.92–5.56) vaccinations.ConclusionsMenB first-dose coverage in the US is low, and even lower for a second dose, with regional variation. Being up to date with other routinely administered vaccines increased the likelihood of receiving MenB vaccination.     

Serogroup B meningococcal vaccination practice patterns on college campuses

BackgroundMost Neisseria meningitidis involved in invasive disease among American college students express serogroup B antigen. The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommends healthcare providers (HCPs) share clinical decision making with patients to determine individual value of meningococcal serogroup B vaccination (MenB) rather than routinely recommend vaccination as with the meningococcal A,C,W,Y vaccine (MenACWY). This study examines the attitudes and practices of HCPs working in college student health centers (SHCs) regarding the recommendation and administration of MenB to students.MethodsThe study was conducted as an online and phone survey of SHC HCPs from a sample of colleges across the United States between May 2017 and July 2018. Items compared college SHC policies and practices for MenB to those for MenACWY. It also assessed perceived barriers to and facilitators of MenB delivery to students.ResultsAmong the 147 respondents, almost 50% more reported their SHC stocked and administered MenACWY (54.1%) than MenB (37%) (p = .004). Almost five times as many colleges required their students receive MenACWY as MenB (53.5% vs. 10.5%, p < .001). A greater percentage requested students to submit records for MenACWY than MenB (77.3% vs. 46.9%, p < .001), and over three times as many tracked student-body coverage rates for MenACWY than MenB (55.6% vs. 15.8%, p < .001). Nearly three quarters of respondents estimated their college’s student body MenB coverage rate to be ≤ 10% or were unable to provide any estimate. Factors perceived by over half of the participants as moderate to extreme barriers to administering MenB included high upfront costs for SHCs to purchase and stock MenB (68.7%), and high out-of-pocket costs for students to receive it (82.8%).ConclusionsA minority of college SHCs require, offer or track Men B vaccination on their campuses. Financial concerns are common barriers to SHCs’ stocking and administering MenB to students.     

Parental awareness of Meningococcal B vaccines and willingness to vaccinate their teens

Background

In the US, Meningococcal B (MenB) vaccines were first licensed in 2014. In 2015, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommended that parents of teens talk to their provider about receiving MenB vaccine, rather than issuing a routine recommendation. We assessed parental awareness of MenB vaccines and willingness to vaccinate their teens with MenB vaccines compared to MenACWY vaccines, which have been routinely recommended for many years.

Parental and provider vaccine hesitancy and non-timely childhood vaccination in Switzerland

ObjectiveAlthough medical providers are a trusted vaccination information source for parents, they do not universally support vaccination. Complementary medicine (CM) providers are particularly likely to hold vaccine hesitant (VH) views, and VH parents often consult with them. Little research compares VH of parents and providers, and if and how each is associated with uptake of recommended childhood vaccines.MethodsWe defined non-timely receipt as recommended vaccines given > 1 month later than officially recommended, based on vaccination records. We administered versions of the Parent Attitudes about Childhood Vaccines (PACV) 5-item survey instrument to 1256 parents and their children’s pediatricians (N = 112, 40 CM-oriented, 72 biomedical [not CM-oriented]) to identify moderately (PACV-score 5–6) and highly (PACV-score 7+) hesitant providers/parents. We obtained multivariable adjusted odds ratios to test relationships between parental VH and provider type/VH, and between non-timely receipt of selected childhood vaccines and parental VH and provider type/VH.ResultsNo biomedical providers were VH, 9 CM providers were moderately VH, and 17 were highly VH. Parents seeing moderately and highly hesitant providers had adjusted odds ratio (AOR) for being VH = 6.6 (95% confidence interval (CI), 3.1–14.0) and AOR = 31.3 (95% CI 16.8–58.3), respectively. Across all vaccine uptake endpoints, children of moderately and highly hesitant parents had 1.9–3.8 and 7.1–12.3 higher odds of non-timely vaccination, and children seeing highly hesitant CM providers had 4.9–9.4 higher odds. Children seeing moderately hesitant CM providers had 3.3 higher odds of non-timely vaccination for the 1st dose of measles and 3.5 higher odds for 1st dose of polio/pertussis/tetanus.ConclusionVH by both parents and providers each is associated with non-timely childhood vaccination. As VH parents are more likely to consult with VH providers, interventions aimed at increasing timely vaccination need to primarily target VH providers and their clients.     

Identification of subgroups in the Danish population for targeted human papillomavirus vaccination efforts

BackgroundIn the Danish childhood vaccination program, the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination coverage is lower than for other vaccines. To tailor a targeted HPV vaccination effort, we aimed to identify girls in Denmark with lower first dose HPV vaccination coverage than girls in general.MethodsA population-based retrospective cohort study was performed of girls born in 2001–2004, residing in Denmark in September 2019 (N = 128,351). Data from the Danish Vaccination Register was linked to sociodemographic data from the Danish Civil Registration System and Statistics Denmark. Cox's proportional hazard regression models were used to compare vaccination uptake rates between subgroups of girls.ResultsHPV vaccination coverage at 14 years of age varied widely by municipality (53.4–80.6%). Girls living with neither of their parents had a lower chance of being vaccinated compared to girls living with both their parents (HR 0.43; 95% CI 0.41–0.46), likewise for girls attending special need education compared with girls attending public schools (HR 0.50; 95% CI 0.42–0.59). The vaccination uptake among immigrants was lower compared to Danish-born girls (HR 0.51; 95% CI 0.49–0.54), especially among immigrant girls whose parents had not passed any Danish exams. Finally, girls who were DTaP-IPV revaccinated had a 50% greater chance of being HPV vaccinated compared to girls who were not (HR 1.61; 95% CI 1.58–1.64).ConclusionTo increase the HPV vaccination uptake, we recommend vaccination efforts targeting girls living without any of their parents, girls attending special need education, immigrants, and girls who are not DTaP-IPV revaccinated. When targeting immigrants, the effort should focus on disseminating sufficient and understandable information about the Danish childhood vaccination program to the parents.     

Persistence of hSBA titers elicited by the meningococcal serogroup B vaccine menB-FHbp for up to 4 years after a 2- or 3-dose primary series and immunogenicity,safety, and tolerability of a booster dose through 26 months

BackgroundTo demonstrate extended protection against meningococcal serogroup B (MenB) disease after MenB-FHbp (bivalent rLP2086) vaccination, this study evaluated immunopersistence through 26 months following MenB-FHbp boosting after 2 or 3 primary doses in adolescents.Study designThis phase 3, open-label study was an extension of 3 phase 2 studies with participants aged 11–18 years randomized to receive primary MenB-FHbp vaccination following 1 of 5 dosing schedules or control. A booster dose was administered 48 months after the primary series. Immunopersistence through 48 months after the last primary dose (persistence stage) and 26 months postbooster (booster stage) was determined by serum bactericidal assays using human complement (hSBAs) against 4 vaccine-heterologous test strains. Safety evaluations included adverse events (AEs) and local and systemic reactions.ResultsOverall, 698 and 304 subjects enrolled in the persistence and booster stages, respectively. hSBA titers declined in all groups during 12 months postprimary vaccination, then remained stable through 48 months. One month postbooster, 93.4–100.0% of subjects achieved hSBA titers ≥ lower limit of quantitation against each test strain; percentages at 12 and 26 months postbooster were higher than at similar time points following primary vaccination. Primary and booster MenB-FHbp vaccinations were well tolerated, with ≤ 12.5% of subjects reporting AEs during each stage. The most common local (reported by 84.4–93.8% of subjects) and systemic (68.8–76.6%) reactions to the booster were injection site pain and fatigue and headache, respectively; ≤ 3.7% of subjects reported severe systemic events.ConclusionProtective hSBA titers initially declined but were retained by many subjects for 4 years irrespective of primary MenB-FHbp vaccination schedule. Boosting at 48 months after primary vaccination was safe, well tolerated, and induced immune responses indicative of immunological memory that persisted through 26 months. Booster vaccination during late adolescence may prolong protection against MenB disease.     

Compliance to Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommendations for pneumococcal vaccination

We evaluated compliance to the ACIP pneumococcal vaccination recommendations issued in 2014 for adults aged ≥ 65 years and in 2012 for adults with high-risk (HR) conditions. The MarketScan® Commercial and Medicare Supplemental databases (January 2007-June 2019) were used to identify the cohorts of interest. Analyses for adults aged ≥ 65 years were adjusted to account for missing vaccination history. Two HR cohorts were identified. The HR1 cohort included patients with immunocompromising conditions, functional or anatomic asplenia, cerebrospinal fluid leak, or cochlear implant. The HR2 cohort included patients with chronic heart, lung, or liver disease; diabetes mellitus; alcoholism; cirrhosis; or cigarette smoking. Full compliance for those aged ≥ 65 years or in the HR1 cohort was defined as receipt of PCV13 and PPSV23, and partial compliance was defined as receipt of PCV13 or PPSV23. For those in the HR2 cohort, full compliance was defined as receipt of PPSV23. Annual compliance rates were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method.Among those aged ≥ 65 years, partial compliance at 4 years post index was 53% and full compliance was 17% in adjusted analyses. In subjects ≥ 65 years receiving the first vaccination, 42% received the second vaccination by year 4. For the HR1 cohort, partial compliance was 19% and full compliance was 5% at 6 years post index date. For the HR2 cohort, full compliance was 20% at 6 years, with the highest rate in patients with diabetes (27%) and the lowest rate in patients with alcoholism (8%).Additional efforts are needed to maximize compliance to the ACIP pneumococcal vaccine recommendations among adults ≥ 65 years of age and adults with HR conditions including streamlined recommendations and single-dose vaccines. These efforts may subsequently reduce the incidence and burden of pneumococcal disease.     

Knowledge,attitudes, and practices regarding seasonal influenza vaccination during pregnancy in Costa Rica: A mixed-methods study

BackgroundInfluenza increases stillbirth risk, morbidity and mortality in pregnant women. Vaccination protects pregnant women against severe disease and indirectly protects their infants, but coverage among pregnant women remains low worldwide. We aimed to describe knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) regarding seasonal influenza vaccination among postpartum women and prenatal care physicians in Costa Rica.MethodsWe conducted cross-sectional KAP surveys to women one to three days after childbirth at Costa Rican Social Security Fund maternity hospitals, and obstetricians and general practitioners who provided prenatal care in 2017. Principal components analysis, multiple imputation, and logistic regression were used to examine associations between influenza vaccination and demographics, prenatal care, and sources of information—separately for postpartum women and physicians. We also held two focus groups of six healthcare workers each to further describe vaccination KAP.ResultsWe surveyed 642 postpartum women and 146 physicians in maternity hospitals in five Costa Rican provinces of whom 85.5 % (95 % CI: 82.6 %-88.0 %) and 57.9 % (95 % CI: 49.6 %-65.7 %) were vaccinated for influenza, respectively. Factors associated with influenza vaccination for postpartum women included tetanus vaccination (aOR: 3.62, 95 % CI: 1.89–6.92); received vaccination recommendations from clinicians during prenatal check-ups (aOR: 3.39, 95 % CI: 2.06–5.59); had other children in household vaccinated for influenza (aOR: 2.25, 95 % CI: 1.08–4.68); and secondary/university education (aOR: 0.15–0.31) with no formal education as reference. For postpartum women, reasons for vaccination were perceived benefits for mother and infant, whereas not being offered vaccines was most cited for non-vaccination. Most prenatal care physicians recommended influenza vaccines during prenatal check-ups but believed vaccination causes flu-like symptoms.ConclusionVaccination campaigns and provisions of free vaccines effectively increased knowledge and coverage among women in Costa Rica. To improve access, women should be offered vaccines during prenatal care appointments. Educating healthcare workers about vaccine benefits for themselves and patients is needed to mitigate safety concerns.     

Effect of provider recommendation style on the length of adolescent vaccine discussions

ObjectiveTo determine whether providers’ vaccine recommendation style affects length of the adolescent vaccine discussions.MethodsWe analyzed vaccine discussions using audio-recordings of clinical encounters where adolescents were eligible for HPV vaccines ± meningococcal vaccines. We measured length of vaccine discussions, the provider’s use of an “indicated” (vaccination due at visit) or “elective” (vaccination is optional) recommendation style, and vaccine receipt. Parent and child demographics, parental vaccination intentions, and parental satisfaction with vaccine discussion were collected from pre- and post-visit surveys. We used linear and logit regressions with random effects to estimate recommendation style’s association with discussion length and with vaccine receipt, respectively.ResultsWe analyzed 106 vaccine discussions (82 HPV; 24 meningococcal) across 82 clinical encounters and 43 providers. Vaccine discussions were longer when providers presented vaccination as elective versus indicated (140 vs. 74 s; p-value < 0.001). Controlling for vaccine type, parental vaccination intent, and patient characteristics, an elective style was associated with 41 seconds longer vaccine discussion (p-value < 0.05). Providers used the indicated style more frequently with the meningococcal vaccine than with the HPV vaccine (96% vs. 72%; p-value < 0.05). Parents’ odds of vaccinating were 9.3 times higher following an indicated versus an elective presentation (p-value < 0.05). Vaccine discussion length and presentation style were not associated with parental satisfaction.ConclusionsOur results suggest that using an indicated recommendation improves vaccine discussions’ efficiency and effectiveness, but this style is used more often with meningococcal than HPV vaccines. Increasing providers’ use of indicated styles for HPV vaccines has the potential to increase vaccination rates and save time during medical visits.     

Long-term effectiveness of pentavalent and monovalent rotavirus vaccines against hospitalization in Taiwan children

BackgroundTwo rotavirus vaccines (RV1 and RV5) are available on the private market in Taiwan, not included in national immunization program. Scanty reports evaluated the rotavirus vaccine effectiveness (VE) in Asian countries.MethodsFrom February 2014-July 2017, we conducted a prospective case-control study in ten hospitals in Taiwan. Case-patients included children aged 8–59 months, and hospitalized with laboratory-confirmed rotavirus acute gastroenteritis (AGE). For each case patient, up to four controls, rotavirus-negative AGE or non-AGE illnesses, respectively, were matched by gender, age and enrolled date. Vaccination history was confirmed through vaccination card or hospital record. VE was calculated as (1 − odds ratio of vaccination) × 100%.ResultsTotally 4248 AGE patients and 2242 non-AGE controls were enrolled. A total of 330 case-patients with rotavirus AGE, 1226 rotavirus-negative AGE controls and 1122 non-AGE controls were included for analysis. Unvaccinated rate was 85.15% for rotavirus-positive cases, 42.9% for rotavirus-negative controls, and 34.31% for non-AGE controls. VE of two-dose RV1 was 84.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]:77.7%, 90.1%) for rotavirus-negative AGE and 88.9% (95% CI: 83.4%, 92.8%) for non-AGE controls, while VE of three-dose RV5 was 92.5% (95% CI: 85.1%, 96.7%) and 96.4% (95% CI: 91.9%, 98.6%), respectively. For respective vaccine, VEs were not significantly different in term of rotavirus genotypes. VEs of both vaccines declined <80% in children aged three years by combined controls.ConclusionsBoth vaccines provided excellent and sustained protection against rotavirus AGE hospitalization in children in Taiwan, but the effectiveness declined slightly in children aged three years.     

Pneumococcal vaccination in older adults: An initial analysis of social determinants of health and vaccine uptake

ObjectivesTo examine the potential influence of social determinants of health on pneumococcal vaccination in older American adults.MethodsThis study used nationwide, US Medicare claims data from 2013 to 2016 to assess uptake of pneumococcal vaccination among adults in the first year after turning age 65. Patients were followed from the point of being 65 years of age and initially enrolled in traditional fee-for-service Medicare or a Medicare Advantage plan through the subsequent year and observed for pneumococcal vaccination in outpatient clinics and pharmacies. Publicly-available data on select social determinants of health were incorporated and guided by the World Health Organization vaccine hesitancy matrix. Logistic regression determined predictors of vaccination while controlling clinical and demographic characteristics.ResultsA total of 307,488 and 74,995 adults aged 65 years were identified from Medicare Advantage and Medicare fee-for-service claims, respectively, and 21.1% of Medicare Advantage and 38.2% of Medicare fee-for-service patients received a pneumococcal vaccine in the first year after turning 65. Those residing in urban areas had a higher likelihood of pneumococcal vaccination in both the Medicare Advantage (OR: 1.31; 95% CI: 1.267–1.344) and Medicare fee-for-service (OR: 1.53; 95% CI: 1.450–1.615) cohorts. Additionally, residing in areas of higher health literacy or communities with more democratic voters were consistently associated with a higher odds of pneumococcal vaccination regardless of Medicare type. Results also pointed to a synergistic relationship between receiving the influenza vaccine and also being vaccinated against pneumococcal disease.ConclusionSocial determinants of health, including local health literacy, poverty, residing in more liberal areas, and access to information, may be influencing the pneumococcal vaccine-related decisions of older adults. However, additional factors associated with the vaccine hesitancy matrix and more granular data (e.g., zip code-level) are needed to fully determine the impact in this and other vaccines recommended in older adults.     

MenACWY-CRM conjugate vaccine booster dose given 4–6 years after priming: Results from a phase IIIb,multicenter, open label study in adolescents and adults

BackgroundVaccination strategies against bacterial meningitis vary across countries. In the United States, a single dose of quadrivalent meningococcal conjugate vaccine (MenACWY) is recommended at 11–12 years of age, with a booster dose approximately 5 years later. We assessed immune responses to a booster dose of MenACWY-CRM vaccine after priming with MenACWY-CRM or MenACWY-D vaccines in adolescents and adults.MethodsIn this phase IIIb, multicenter, open-label study, healthy 15–55-year-olds, who received MenACWY-CRM (N = 301) or MenACWY-D (N = 300) 4–6 years earlier or were meningococcal vaccine-naïve (N = 100), received one MenACWY-CRM vaccine dose. Immunogenicity was evaluated pre-vaccination, 3 or 5 days post-vaccination (sampling subgroups), and 28 days post-vaccination by serum bactericidal activity assay using human complement (hSBA). After vaccination, participants were monitored for 7 days for reactogenicity, 29 days for unsolicited adverse events (AEs), and 181 days for serious AEs and medically-attended AEs.ResultsSufficiency of the immune response to a MenACWY-CRM booster dose was demonstrated; the lower limit of the 1-sided 97.5% confidence interval for percentages of participants with hSBA seroresponse at 28 days post-vaccination was >75% for each serogroup in those primed with either the MenACWY-CRM or MenACWY-D vaccine. Seroresponse was observed in ≥93.24% of primed participants and ≥35.87% of naïve participants 28 days post-vaccination. At 5 days post-booster, among primed participants, hSBA titers ≥1:8 were achieved in ≥47.14% of participants for MenA and in ≥85.52% of participants for MenC, MenW and MenY, and 3.25- to 8.59-fold increases in hSBA geometric mean titers against each vaccine serogroup were observed. No safety concerns were raised throughout the 6-month follow-up period.ConclusionsA booster dose of the MenACWY-CRM vaccine induced a robust and rapid anamnestic response in adolescents and adults, irrespectively of either MenACWY-CRM or MenACWY-D vaccine administered 4–6 years earlier, with an acceptable clinical safety profile.ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT02986854.An Audio Summary linked to this article that can be found on Figshare https://figshare.com/articles/MenACWY-CRM_conjugate_vaccine_booster_dose_given_4_6_years_after_priming_Results_from_a_phase_IIIb_multicenter_open_label_study_in_adolescents_and_adults_mp4/11823048     

Effectiveness of Covid-19 vaccines against symptomatic and asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections in an urgent care setting

BackgroundIt is critical to monitor changes in vaccine effectiveness against COVID-19 outcomes for various vaccine products in different population subgroups.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective study in patients ≥12 years who underwent testing for SARS-CoV-2 virus from April 14 through October 25, 2021, at urgent care centers in the New York metropolitan area. Patients self-reported vaccination status at the time of testing. We used a test-negative design to estimate vaccine effectiveness (VE) by comparing odds of a positive test for SARS-CoV-2 infection among vaccinated (n = 474,805), partially vaccinated (n = 87,834), and unvaccinated (n = 369,333) patients, adjusted for demographic factors and calendar time.ResultsVE against symptomatic infection after 2 doses of mRNA vaccine was 96% (95% Confidence Interval: 95%, 97%) in the pre-delta period and reduced to 79% (95% CI: 77%, 81%) in the delta period. In the delta period, VE for 12–15-year-olds (85%; [95% CI: 81%, 88%]) was higher compared to older age groups (<65% for all other age groups). VE estimates did not differ by sex and race/ethnicity. VE against symptomatic infection was the highest for individuals with a prior infection followed by full vaccination. VE against symptomatic infection after the 2-dose mRNA-1273 vaccine (82% [95% CI: 80%, 84%]) was higher compared to the BNT162b2 vaccine (76% [95% CI: 74%, 78%]) in the delta period. VE after 1-dose of the Ad26.COV2.S vaccine was the lowest compared to other vaccines (19% [95% CI: 15%, 23%]) in the delta period.ConclusionsVE against infection after two doses of the mRNA vaccines was high initially, but significantly reduced against the delta variant for both FDA-approved vaccines.     

Validation of parental reports of rotavirus vaccination of their children compared to the national immunization registry

BackgroundThe introduction of rotavirus vaccines into national immunization programs necessitates vaccine effectiveness evaluations. Parental report of vaccination status is a simple and accessible source of information; however, its validity is unclear.AimsTo validate parental reports of rotavirus immunization compared to documentation of vaccination in national immunization registry, and to assess vaccine effectiveness by each method.MethodsParents of 1272 children aged 2–59 months from northern Israel hospitalized for gastroenteritis in 2011–2015 were interviewed on the sociodemographics and rotavirus vaccination status of their child. Rotavirus immunization status based on parental report was compared to that documented in the national immunization registry, which was considered the gold standard. Stool samples collected from patients were tested for rotavirus antigen by immunochromotgraphy. In a rotavirus test-negative case-control study, vaccination history was compared between children found positive for rotavirus and those who tested negative. Vaccine effectiveness for ≥ 1 dose vs. zero doses was calculated as: (1-adjusted odds ratio) * 100.ResultsThe sensitivity and specificity of parental report of their child's immunization with a rotavirus vaccine were 97% (95% CI 96–98), and 75% (95% CI 65–82), respectively. Kappa coefficient was 0.69 (p < 0.001) for the agreement between the two methods. Rotavirus vaccine effectiveness was 72% (95% CI 54–84) when using parental report of rotavirus immunization and 79% (95% CI 62–88) when using the registry.ConclusionParental report of their child's immunization with a rotavirus vaccine demonstrated high sensitivity, although the specificity was relatively low. Vaccine effectiveness was similar regardless of method used to determine rotavirus immunization status. Parental report of vaccination status can be useful in vaccine effectiveness assessment.     

Influenza vaccination coverage among persons seeking outpatient medical care for acute respiratory illness in five states in the United States, 2011–2012 through 2018–2019

BackgroundIn the United States (U.S.), annual influenza vaccination has been recommended for all persons aged ≥6 months with the Healthy People 2020 coverage target of 70%. However, vaccination coverage has remained around 42–49% during the past eight influenza seasons. We sought to quantify influenza vaccination coverage and factors associated with vaccination in persons seeking outpatient medical care for an acute respiratory illness (ARI).MethodsWe enrolled outpatients aged ≥6 months with ARI from >50 U.S. clinics from 2011 to 2012 through 2018–2019 influenza seasons and tested for influenza with molecular assays. Vaccination status was based on documented receipt of the current season’s influenza vaccine. We estimated vaccination coverage among influenza-negative study participants by study site, age, and season, and compared to state-level influenza coverage estimates in the general population based on annual immunization surveys. We used multivariable logistic regression to examine factors independently associated with receipt of influenza vaccines.ResultsWe enrolled 45,424 study participants with ARI who tested negative for influenza during the study period. Annual vaccination coverage among influenza-negative ARI patients and the general population in the participating states averaged 55% (range: 47–62%), and 52% (range: 46–54%), respectively. Among enrollees, coverage was highest among adults aged ≥65 years (82%; range, 80–85%) and lowest among adolescents aged 13–17 years (38%; range, 35–41%). Factors significantly associated with non-vaccination included non-White race, no college degree, exposure to cigarette smoke, absence of high-risk conditions, and not receiving prior season influenza vaccine.ConclusionsInfluenza vaccination coverage over eight seasons among outpatients with non-influenza respiratory illness was slightly higher than coverage in the general population but 15% lower than national targets. Increased efforts to promote vaccination especially in groups with lower coverage are warranted to attain optimal health benefits of influenza vaccine.     

Persistence of bactericidal antibodies following primary and booster MenACWY-TT vaccination of toddlers: A review of clinical studies

The long-term persistence of antibody responses following primary vaccination with quadrivalent conjugate vaccines targeting meningococcal serogroups A, C, W, and Y (MenACWY) and the duration of protection following a booster dose have not been fully elucidated, particularly in children who received primary dosing as toddlers. This review summarizes the findings of one phase 3 and three phase 2 open-label, randomized clinical studies that assessed the long-term antibody persistence of MenACWY conjugated to tetanus toxoid as a carrier protein (MenACWY-TT) in toddlers. Following primary vaccination, antibody responses persisted for approximately 2–3 years and then decreased up to 5 years after vaccination. Geometric mean titers remained elevated for all serogroups up to 5 years after primary vaccination. In children who received a booster dose of MenACWY-TT at 4–5 years after primary dosing as toddlers, antibody responses were documented in >99% of subjects across all serogroups, with minimal decreases in antibody persistence from 2–6 years after booster vaccination. The persistence of meningococcal serogroup C (MenC) antibody responses was similar between MenACWY-TT and MenC vaccine recipients after primary and booster dosing. Together, these findings indicate that antibody responses to primary MenACWY-TT vaccination persist for 2–3 years. Additionally, these findings indicate that in subjects who receive primary MenACWY-TT vaccination as toddlers, the antibody response to booster MenACWY-TT vaccination lasts for up to 6 years and suggest that immune memory is afforded at least into early adolescence, which is an age group at increased risk of invasive meningococcal disease.     

Duration of influenza vaccine effectiveness in the elderly in Japan: A retrospective cohort study using large-scale population-based registry data

BackgroundThe immune response to influenza vaccination in the elderly is likely to be lower than that in young adults. Clinical protection may not persist year-round in the elderly. However, the effectiveness of influenza vaccine in the elderly has not been adequately studied, especially in terms of the duration of effectiveness.MethodsWe used a linked database of healthcare administrative claims data and vaccination records maintained by the municipality of a city in Kanto region of Japan. We studied individuals who were aged 65 years or older at baseline and were followed up between April 1, 2014 to March 31, 2020. The duration of influenza vaccine effectiveness by age category was analyzed using a time-dependent piecewise Cox proportional hazard model with time-dependent vaccine status, prior season vaccination and covariates confirmed in the baseline period (age, sex, cancer, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases, asthma, chronic kidney diseases, and cardiovascular diseases).ResultsWe identified an analysis population of 83,146 individuals, of which 7,401 (8.9%) had experienced influenza and 270 (0.32%) underwent influenza-related hospitalization. Individuals who were vaccinated during the first season (n = 47,338) were older than non-vaccinated individuals (n = 35,808) (average age, 75.8 vs. 74.1 years, respectively). The multivariable analysis showed a lower incidence of influenza in vaccinated individuals (hazard ratio [HR], 0.47; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.43–0.51; P < 0.001), while the incidence of hospitalization for influenza did not differ significantly by vaccination status (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.53–1.18; P = 0.249). Protective effectiveness against incidence was maintained for 4 or 5 months after vaccination in those aged 65–69 and 80-years, 5 months in 70–79 years.ConclusionsOur study identified moderate vaccine effectiveness in preventing the incidence of influenza in the Japanese elderly. Vaccine effectiveness showed a trend of gradual attenuation. Clinicians should suspect influenza infection even in those vaccinated, especially in elderly individuals who had received vaccination more than 4 or 5 months previously.     

School immunization coverage in adolescents during the COVID-19 pandemic: A retrospective cohort study

IntroductionFew studies have assessed the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on immunization coverage for adolescents, and little is known about how coverage has changed throughout the pandemic. We aimed to: (1) assess the change in coverage for school-based vaccines in Alberta, Canada resulting from the pandemic; (2) determine whether coverage differed by geographic health zone and school type; and (3) ascertain whether coverage has returned to pre-pandemic levels.MethodsUsing a retrospective cohort design, we used administrative health data to compare coverage for human papillomavirus (HPV) and meningococcal conjugate A, C, Y, W-135 (MenC-ACYW) vaccines between pre-pandemic (2017–2018 school year) and pandemic (2019–2020 and 2020–2021 school years) cohorts (N = 289,420). Coverage was also compared by health zone and authority type. The 2019–2020 cohort was followed over one year to assess catch-up.ResultsCompared to 2017–2018, immunization coverage for HPV was significantly lower in the 2019–2020 (absolute difference: 60.8%; 95% CI: 60.4–61.3%) and 2020–2021 cohorts (absolute difference: 59.9%; 95% CI: 59.4–60.3%). There was a smaller, significant decline in MenC-ACYW coverage comparing 2017–2018 to 2019–2020 (absolute difference: 6.1%; 95% CI: 5.6–6.5%) and 2020–2021 (absolute difference: 32.2%; 95% CI: 31.6–32.7%). Private schools had low coverage overall, while coverage fluctuated by zone. During follow-up of the 2019–2020 cohort, coverage for HPV and MenC-ACYW increased from 5.6% to 50.2%, and 80.7% to 83.0%, respectively.ConclusionThere was a substantial decrease in school-based immunization coverage during the COVID-19 pandemic, and coverage has not returned to pre-pandemic levels, suggesting further catch-up is needed.     

Effectiveness of recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV) in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

Background and AimsPatients with Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at an increased risk of developing herpes zoster (HZ). The effectiveness of the recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV) in patients with IBD is unknown.MethodsIn this retrospective cohort study using Explorys (October 2017–April 2020; IBM Corporation, Somers, NY, USA), the effectiveness of RZV for the prevention of HZ in patients with IBD ≥ 50 years was compared to general population aged ≥ 50 years. Rates of de-novo HZ were compared between patients with IBD and the general population and stratified by number of RZV doses received. Results are presented as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).ResultsThe overall proportion of IBD patients ≥ 50 years who received HZ vaccination with the live zoster vaccine (ZVL) or RZV was low (n = 11320, out of 112,200 IBD patients in the cohort). A total of 1670 patients received RZV. Receipt of the RZV resulted in a significantly lower rate of HZ in IBD patients (OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.23–0.56) compared to the general population (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.59–0.92). However, despite vaccination, patients with IBD who received the RZV were still 3-times more likely to develop HZ during the study follow up period compared to the general population receiving the RZV (OR 3.06, 95% CI 1.87–5.02) and unvaccinated IBD patients were 6-times more likely to develop HZ compared to general population (OR 6.21, 95% CI 6.02–6.41).ConclusionThe recombinant zoster vaccine is effective in reducing the risk of HZ in patients with IBD compared to the general population. During our follow up period, patients with IBD, however, still remain at an increased risk for HZ despite vaccination.