Immunogenicity and safety of two monovalent rotavirus vaccines,ROTAVAC® and ROTAVAC 5D® in Zambian infants

Background and AimsROTAVAC® (frozen formulation stored at −20 °C) and ROTAVAC 5D® (liquid formulation stable at 2–8 °C) are rotavirus vaccines derived from the 116E human neonatal rotavirus strain, developed and licensed in India. This study evaluated and compared the safety and immunogenicity of these vaccines in an infant population in Zambia.MethodsWe conducted a phase 2b, open-label, randomized, controlled trial wherein 450 infants 6 to 8 weeks of age were randomized equally to receive three doses of ROTAVAC or ROTAVAC 5D, or two doses of ROTARIX®. Study vaccines were administered concomitantly with routine immunizations. Blood samples were collected pre-vaccination and 28 days after the last dose. Serum anti-rotavirus IgA antibodies were measured by ELISA, with WC3 and 89–12 rotavirus strains as viral lysates in the assays. The primary analysis was to assess non-inferiority of ROTAVAC 5D to ROTAVAC in terms of the geometric mean concentration (GMC) of serum IgA (WC3) antibodies. Seroresponse and seropositivity were also determined. Safety was evaluated as occurrence of immediate, solicited, unsolicited, and serious adverse events after each dose.ResultsThe study evaluated 388 infants in the per-protocol population. All three vaccines were well tolerated and immunogenic. The post-vaccination GMCs were 14.0 U/mL (95% CI: 10.4, 18.8) and 18.1 U/mL (95% CI: 13.7, 24.0) for the ROTAVAC and ROTAVAC 5D groups, respectively, yielding a ratio of 1.3 (95% CI: 0.9, 1.9), thus meeting the pre-set non-inferiority criteria. Solicited and unsolicited adverse events were similar across all study arms. No death or intussusception case was reported during study period.ConclusionsAmong Zambian infants, both ROTAVAC and ROTAVAC 5D were well tolerated and the immunogenicity of ROTAVAC 5D was non-inferior to that of ROTAVAC. These results are consistent with those observed in licensure trials in India and support use of these vaccines across wider geographical areas.     

Immunogenicity and safety of a trivalent inactivated 2010–2011 influenza vaccine in Taiwan infants aged 6–12 months

This prospective study aimed to investigate the immune responses and safety of an influenza vaccine in vaccine-naïve infants aged 6–12 months, and was conducted from November 2010 to May 2011. Fifty-nine infants aged 6–12 months received two doses of trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine 4 weeks apart. Hemagglutination inhibition titers were measured 4 weeks after the two doses of study vaccine. Based on the assumption that a hemagglutination inhibition titer of 1:40 or greater against the antigen would be protective in adults, two doses of the study vaccine generated a protective immune response of 63.2% against influenza A(H1N1), 82.5% against influenza A(H3N2) and 38.6% against influenza B viruses in infants aged 6–12 months. The geometric mean fold rises against influenza type A and B viruses also met the European Medicines Agency criteria for flu vaccines. The solicited events within 7 days after vaccination were mild in intensity. No deaths or adverse events such as optic neuritis, cranial neuropathy, and brachial neuropathy or Guillain-Barre syndrome were reported. Two doses of inactivated influenza vaccine were well tolerated and induced a protective immune response against influenza in infants aged 6–12 months.     

Immunogenicity of the AIK-C measles vaccine in infants aged <9 months in Vietnam

Measles-associated deaths have been reported in infants <9 months during outbreaks. A cohort study was conducted on 210 infants aged 6–8 months to evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of the AIK-C measles vaccine containing 10^4.21 plaque-forming units (PFU)/0.5 mL produced in Vietnam. Paired serum samples were obtained from 196 subjects. Seropositivity was defined as ≥120 mIU/mL. The seroresponse rate was 173/196 (88.27%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 83.77–92.77%) with geometric mean titer (GMT) of 511 mIU/mL (95% CI: 688–880 mIU/mL), and no significant differences were observed by different age groups. Among 196 paired sera, they were categorized into four groups: 122 subjects <14 IU/mL, 28 subjects 14–<60 mIU/mL, 30 subjects 60–<120 mIU/mL, and 16 subjects ≥ 120 mIU/mL. The seroresponse rate was 112/122 (91.8%, 95% CI: 86.94–96.67%) with GMT (597 mIU/mL, 95% CI: 749–1002 mIU/mL) in the <14 mIU/L group. In the 14–<60 mIU/mL group, the seroresponse rate was 18/28 (64.29%) with 184 mIU/L of GMT and was significantly lower (p < 0.01) than that in the <14 mIU/mL group. In the 16 seropositive group, all subjects showed seroconversion (4-fold higher than before) with a higher GMT of 1078 mIU/mL. Local pain and itching at the injection site were observed in 8 subjects (3.8%) within 7 days of the vaccination. Regarding systemic adverse reactions, febrile illness ≥37.5 °C was observed in 14 subjects (6.7%). These results indicate that the AIK-C measles vaccine is effective and safe for infants aged 6–8 months and will contribute to reducing the number of measles-associated deaths in future outbreaks.     

Immunogenicity and safety of CRM₁₉₇ conjugated 9-valent pneumococcal and meningococcal C combination vaccine in healthy infants

Streptococcus pneumoniae and Neisseria meningitidis cause invasive disease in children aged <2 years. While individual conjugate vaccines are available to protect this age group against these pathogens, availability of a vaccine combining these antigens into a single injection is desirable. This study randomized 467 healthy infants to receive 4 doses of combination 9-valent pneumococcal and meningococcal serogroup C conjugate vaccine (9vPnC-MnCC) or 9-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (9vPnC). Percentages of subjects achieving immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody concentrations ≥0.35μg/mL and geometric mean IgG concentrations for each pneumococcal serotype in the 9vPnC-MnCC group were noninferior compared to the 9vPnC group. Both vaccines were well-tolerated.     

Evaluation of the safety,reactogenicity and immunogenicity of FluBlok trivalent recombinant baculovirus-expressed hemagglutinin influenza vaccine administered intramuscularly to healthy children aged 6–59 months

Background

Recombinant baculovirus-expressed hemagglutinin (rHA [FluBlok^®]) influenza vaccine is unique in avoiding production in eggs and its rapid production capability.

Objective

Compare the safety and immunogenicity of trivalent FluBlok to egg-grown trivalent influenza vaccine (TIV) in children.

Methods

Healthy children were randomized to receive two doses of study vaccines. TIV (7.5 μg HA/antigen), FluBlok-22.5 (22.5 μg rHA/antigen), or FluBlok-45 (45 μg rHA/antigen) were given to 115 children ages 6–35 months. TIV (15 μg HA/antigen) or FluBlok-45 was given to 41 children ages 36–59 months. Safety and reactogenicity data were collected post-vaccination. Serum hemagglutination-inhibition antibody (HI) titers were measured before and 28 days after vaccination.

Results

No serious vaccine-related adverse events occurred and reactogenicity events to equal volumes of TIV or FluBlok were generally similar. However, in the younger children, selected local and systemic symptoms were recorded significantly more frequently to 0.5 mL FluBlok-45 than to 0.25 mL doses of either the FluBlok-22.5 or 7.5 μg TIV vaccines. In the younger children, the immunogenicity to TIV was generally significantly superior to FluBlok. Serologic responses to FluBlok were higher in the older children than the younger group, but were still somewhat lower compared to TIV.

Conclusion

These data suggests that FluBlok is as safe but less immunogenic than similar volumes of TIV, particularly in the youngest children. The immunogenicity data is the converse of what has been observed in adults. Further studies examining the immunogenicity of FluBlok in older children are warranted.     

Immunogenicity and safety of a new live attenuated herpes zoster vaccine (NBP608) compared to Zostavax® in healthy adults aged 50 years and older

A multi-centre, randomised, double-blinded, active-controlled, parallel-group clinical trial was carried out to assess the immunogenicity and safety of NBP608—a newly developed live-attenuated zoster vaccine in Korea—relative to Zostavax® in healthy adults aged 50 years or older. Immune responses to the vaccine were evaluated by glycoprotein enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (gpELISA) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot (ELISPOT) assays using the interferon (IFN)-γ and interleukin (IL)-2 FluoroSpot kit 6 weeks after vaccination. Safety was monitored for 26 weeks based on subjects’ diaries, spontaneous reports from subjects, and history taking by the investigators. A total of 845 subjects participated in the screening, and 823 received the vaccination (413 in the NBP608 group and 411 in the comparator group). The gpELISA-determined geometric mean fold rise from baseline to post NBP608 vaccination was 2.75 [95% confidence interval, CI (2.57, 2.94)]. The gpELISA-determined adjusted geometric mean titers (GMTs) of NBP608 and the comparator were 1346.37 [95% CI (1273.99, 1422.87)] and 1674.94 [95% CI (1585.35, 1769.58)], respectively. The adjusted GMT ratio of NBP608 to the comparator was 0.80 [95% CI (0.75, 0.87)]. There was no statistically significant difference between two groups in terms of the geometric mean spot numbers determined by IFN-γ and IL-2 ELISPOT assays at 6 weeks post vaccination (P = 0.7232, 0.3844). The incidence of adverse events (AEs) within 6 weeks post vaccination was 49.82% overall (410/823, 941 cases), 50.73% (209/412, 474 cases) in the NBP608 group, and 48.91% (201/411, 467 cases) in the comparator group. The difference in AE rate between the two groups was not statistically significant (P = 0.6010). Most AEs were mild, with a rate of 83.12% in the NBP608 group and 75.37% in the comparator group. Thus, NBP608 is non-inferior to Zostavax® in terms of inducing the immune response and can be safely administered to adults aged 50 years or older.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03120364.     

A randomized,open-labelled,non-inferiority phase 4 clinical trial to evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of the live,attenuated, oral rotavirus vaccine,ROTAVAC® in comparison with a licensed rotavirus vaccine in healthy infants

BackgroundROTAVAC® (nHRV), derived naturally from the human 116E rotavirus (RV) neonatal strain, was licensed in India in 2015 based on promising results of a phase 3, safety and efficacy vaccine trial. As a pre-requisite for WHO prequalification, we compared the immunogenicity and safety of ROTAVAC® to those of a WHO-prequalified, Rotarix®.MethodsWe conducted a multicentre, open-labeled, randomized phase 4 clinical trial where 464 infants, 6–8 weeks of age were equally randomized to receive as licensed, the complete regimen of ROTAVAC® (3 doses; Group I) or Rotarix® (2 doses; Group II). Antibody responses (serum anti-RV Immunoglobulin A [IgA]) were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The primary analysis was an assessment of non-inferiority of ROTAVAC® to Rotarix® for geometric mean concentration (GMC) for infants who received the complete regimen of either vaccine.ResultsThe GMC for Group I was 20.4 (95%CI: 17.6, 23.6) and that for Group II was 24.8 (95%CI: 20.3, 30.3), the GMC ratio was 0.82 (95% CI: 0.64, 1.05), thus meeting the non-inferiority criterion. Site-wise analysis of GMC titres revealed that one site had a peculiar pre-vaccination titre affecting only ROTAVAC® post-vaccination GMCs. Seroconversion rates were 35.3% (95%CI: 29.0, 41.9) and 31.0% (95%CI: 25.1, 37.4) for Groups I and Group II, respectively. There was no substantive difference in safety profiles between both vaccines.ConclusionsThe complete regimen of ROTAVAC® demonstrated immunological non-inferiority to the complete regimen of Rotarix® with a clinically acceptable safety profile. Because the demand for RV vaccines is increasing as more countries are expanding their immunization schedules, the lack of need of a buffering agent, low dose volume (0.5 mL), non-interference with other concomitantly administered vaccines, and conformance with WHO-prequalification requirements provide ROTAVAC® the potential for widespread global usage. Post completion of this study, ROTAVAC® is now a WHO-prequalified vaccine.Clinical Trials Registration: (CTRI Number: CTRI/2015/12/006428).     

Immunogenicity and safety of diphtheria–tetanus vaccine in pre-adolescent and adolescent South Koreans

This study was conducted to compare the immunogenicity and safety of diphtheria–tetanus (Td) vaccine between pre-adolescents aged 11–12 years and adolescents aged 13–18 years. A total of 277 subjects (132 pre-adolescents and 145 adolescents) participated. After vaccination, all subjects (100%) in both groups exhibited seroprotective antibody levels (≥0.1 IU/mL) against diphtheria or tetanus toxoids. Although local adverse events following vaccination were more frequently observed in the pre-adolescent group than in the adolescent group (p = 0.006), these events resolved within 7 days. Our study shows Td vaccination at age 11–12 years to be immunogenic and tolerable.     

Immunogenicity and reactogenicity of a decennial booster dose of a combined reduced-antigen-content diphtheria–tetanus–acellular pertussis and inactivated poliovirus booster vaccine (dTpa–IPV) in healthy adults

BackgroundPertussis in adults and adolescents could be reduced by replacing traditional tetanus and diphtheria (Td) boosters with reduced-antigen-content diphtheria–tetanus–acellular pertussis (dTpa) vaccines. This study evaluated the administration of dTpa–IPV (dTpa–inactivated poliovirus) in adults ten years after they received a booster dose of either dTpa–IPV, dTpa+IPV or Td–IPV in trial NCT01277705.MethodsOpen multicentre, phase IV study (www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT01323959) in which healthy adults, who had received a previous dose of dTpa–IPV, dTpa+IPV or Td–IPV ten years earlier, received a single decennial booster dose of dTpa–IPV (Boostrix™-polio, GlaxoSmithKline Vaccines). Blood samples were collected before and one month after booster vaccination. Antibody concentrations against all vaccine antigens were measured and reactogenicity and safety were assessed.ResultsA total of 211 subjects (mean age 50.3 years) received vaccination of whom 201 were included in the according-to-protocol cohort for immunogenicity. Before the decennial dTpa–IPV booster, ≥71.0% subjects were seroprotected/seropositive against all vaccine antigens. One month after the booster dose, all subjects were seroprotected against tetanus and poliovirus types 2 and 3; ≥95.7% subjects were seroprotected against diphtheria and ≥98.3% against poliovirus type 1. Anti-pertussis booster responses for the various antigens were observed in ≥76.5% (pertussis toxoid; PT), ≥85.1% (filamentous haemagglutinin; FHA) and ≥63.2% (pertactin; PRN) of subjects. During the 4-day follow-up, the overall incidence of local AEs was 71.6%, 75.0% and 72.2% in dTpa–IPV, dTpa+IPV and Td–IPV groups, respectively. Pain was the most frequent solicited local adverse event (AE; ≥62.7% subjects) and fatigue the most frequent solicited general AE (≥18.5%). No serious AEs were reported during the study.ConclusionA booster dose of dTpa–IPV was immunogenic and well tolerated in adults who had received a booster dose of either dTpa–IPV, dTpa+IPV or Td–IPV, ten years previously and supports the repeated administration of dTpa–IPV.     

Immunogenicity and safety of an inactivated quadrivalent influenza vaccine: A randomized,double-blind,controlled phase III study in healthy population aged ≥3 years

Inactivated quadrivalent influenza vaccine (IIV4) containing two influenza A strains (H1N1 and H3N2) and one strain from each B lineage (Victoria and Yamagata) may offer broader protection against seasonal influenza. This study examined the immunogenicity and safety of a candidate IIV4. A randomized, double-blind, controlled phase III clinical trial was conducted in healthy subjects aged ≥3 years. Subjects were randomly assigned into three groups in a 2:1:1 ratio, receiving single dose of IIV4 or inactivated trivalent influenza vaccine (IIV3) which contains either B/Victoria strain (BV) or B/Yamagata strain (BY). Blood samples were collected before and 28 days after vaccination to test hemagglutination inhibition (HI) antibodies of the four influenza strains. Safety information was collected for 28 days after vaccination. A total of 2320 subjects (IIV4: 1160, IIV3-BV: 580, IIV3-BY: 580) were enrolled in this study. After vaccination, the seroconversion rates of IIV4 against H1N1, H3N2, BV and BY strains were 77.15%, 81.93%, 60.14% and 64.57%, respectively. Geometric mean titers (GMTs) against the four influenza strains were 523.91, 274.13, 115.35 and 257.81, respectively. The investigational IIV4 was non-inferiority to IIV3 for the four strains, meanwhile superior to IIV3 for additional B strains (B/BV, B/BY). For safety, there had no significant difference in the incidence of the adverse reactions among the three groups (P = 0.5986). No serious adverse events related to vaccination occurred. The IIV4 had good immunogenicity and safety, which added an influenza B protection with no increased safety concerns. (ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT03853993)     

Immunogenicity and safety of a multicomponent meningococcal serogroup B vaccine in healthy adolescents in Korea—A randomised trial

BackgroundNeisseria meningitidis serogroup B is a significant cause of septicaemia and meningitis worldwide. This phase 3 randomised, controlled study assessed the immunogenicity and safety of a multicomponent meningococcal serogroup B vaccine, 4CMenB, in healthy Korean adolescents.Methods264 adolescents (11–17 years old) were randomised to receive two doses, one month apart, of 4CMenB or control vaccines [placebo followed by one dose of a quadrivalent meningococcal ACWY glycoconjugate vaccine (MenACWY-CRM)]. Immunogenicity was evaluated by serum bactericidal assay with human complement (hSBA) against three serogroup B test strains specific for individual vaccine antigens (fHbp, NadA or PorA P1.4), and by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) against the NHBA antigen. Solicited reactions and adverse events (AEs) were assessed.ResultsOne month post-second vaccination, 98%, 97%, and 97% of subjects in the 4CMenB group achieved hSBA titres ≥4 against the fHbp, NadA and PorA test strains, respectively, while percentages in the Control group were comparable to baseline (27%, 16%, and 17%, respectively). Geometric mean ELISA concentrations (GMCs) against NHBA increased 52-fold relative to baseline in the 4CMenB group, while there was no substantial increase in GMCs in the Control group (1.05-fold). Frequencies of solicited reactions after any vaccination were higher in the 4CMenB group than in the Control group, although most reactions were of short duration and mild to moderate intensity. There were no vaccine-related serious AEs.ConclusionsTwo doses of 4CMenB induced robust immune responses against the vaccine antigens and were well tolerated, with no safety concerns identified, in Korean adolescents (NCT01973218).     

Immunogenicity and safety of an adjuvanted inactivated polio vaccine,IPV-Al,compared to standard IPV: A phase 3 observer-blinded,randomised, controlled trial in infants vaccinated at 6, 10, 14 weeks and 9 months of age

BackgroundA dose-sparing inactivated polio vaccine (IPV-Al), obtained by adsorption of inactivated virus to an aluminium hydroxide adjuvant, can help mitigate global supply and the cost constraints of IPV. The objective of this trial was to demonstrate the non-inferiority of IPV-Al to standard IPV.MethodsThis phase 3, observer-blinded, randomised, controlled trial was conducted at 5 investigational sites in the Philippines. Infants not previously vaccinated with any polio vaccines were randomised to receive three IPV-Al (n = 502) or IPV vaccinations (n = 500) at 6, 10 and 14 weeks of age plus a booster vaccination at 9 months. The primary endpoint was type-specific seroconversion, defined as an antibody titre ≥4-fold higher than the estimated maternal antibody titre and a titre ≥8, one month after the primary vaccination series.ResultsSeroconversion rates following primary vaccination with IPV-Al (483 infants in the per-protocol analysis set) or IPV (478 infants) were: polio type 1, 97.1% versus 99.0%; type 2, 94.2% versus 99.0%; and type 3, 98.3% versus 99.6%. IPV-Al was non-inferior to IPV, as the lower 95% confidence limits of the treatment differences were above the predefined −10%-point limit: type 1, −1.85% (−3.85; −0.05); type 2, −4.75% (−7.28; −2.52); type 3, −1.24 (−2.84; 0.13). The booster effect (geometric mean titre (GMT) post-booster / GMT pre-booster) was: type 1, 63 versus 43; type 2, 54 versus 47; type 3, 112 versus 80. IPV-Al was well tolerated with a safety profile comparable to that of IPV. Serious adverse events were recorded for 29 infants (5.8%, 37 events) in the IPV-Al group compared to 28 (5.6%, 48 events) in the IPV group.ConclusionNon-inferiority of IPV-Al to IPV with respect to seroconversion was confirmed and a robust booster response was demonstrated. Both vaccines had a similar safety profile.ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03032419.     

Immunogenicity and safety of measles-mumps-rubella vaccine at two different potency levels administered to healthy children aged 12–15 months: A phase III,randomized, non-inferiority trial

BackgroundThe potency of live viral vaccines decreases over time. We compared the immunogenicity and safety of GSK measles-mumps-rubella vaccine (MMR-RIT) formulations at two different potencies with that of the commercially-available MMR II formulation.MethodsIn this phase III observer-blind clinical study (NCT01681992), 4516 healthy children aged 12–15 months were randomized (1:1:1 ratio) to receive one dose of MMR-RIT at the minimum potency used for this study (MMR-RIT-Min) or MMR-RIT at the second lowest potency used for this study (MMR-RIT-Med), or control MMR II vaccine. A second dose (MMR-RIT or MMR II) was administered 42 days after the first. The study had 10 co-primary objectives to evaluate MMR-RIT versus MMR II immunogenicity via a hierarchical procedure. Anti-measles and anti-rubella antibodies were measured by ELISA and anti-mumps antibodies by ELISA and unenhanced plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT).ResultsEach formulation induced immune responses to all vaccine antigens after each MMR dose. While the primary objectives for MMR-RIT-Min were not met, MMR-RIT-Med induced immune responses as measured by ELISA against the three vaccine antigens that met pre-specified non-inferiority criteria. The immune response following MMR-RIT-Med against mumps measured by PRNT failed the non-inferiority criterion for seroresponse rate: the 97.5% confidence interval lower limit (−10.94%) was beyond the pre-defined limit of −10%. Immune responses were comparable among groups post-dose 2. No safety concerns were identified, and MMR-RIT and MMR II vaccines had similar reactogenicity and safety profiles.ConclusionsOne dose of MMR-RIT formulation with lower potency (MMR-RIT-Med) induced a non-inferior immune response compared to commercial MMR II vaccine, measured by ELISA in one-year-old children. Non-inferiority was not demonstrated in terms of immune response against mumps virus measured by unenhanced PRNT, although the difference was of uncertain clinical relevance. After the second dose, immune responses were comparable among the MMR-RIT and MMR II groups.     

Evaluation of the safety, reactogenicity and immunogenicity of FluBlok® trivalent recombinant baculovirus-expressed hemagglutinin influenza vaccine administered intramuscularly to healthy adults 50-64 years of age

Background

Alternative methods for influenza vaccine production are needed to ensure adequate supplies.

Methods

Healthy adults 50-64 years were assigned randomly to receive one intramuscular injection of trivalent recombinant hemagglutinin (rHA) or U.S. licensed trivalent inactivated vaccine (TIV) containing H1, H3 and B antigens (Ag) derived from 2007 to 2008 influenza virus strains A/Solomon Islands/03/2006 (H1N1), A/Wisconsin/67/2005 (H3N2), and B/Malaysia/2506/2004. Each rHA dose contained 45 μg HA/strain of the 2007-2008 FDA-recommended Ag vs. 15 μg/strain for TIV. Antibody (Ab) responses were measured using a hemagglutination-inhibition (HAI) assay at baseline and 28 days post-vaccination. Respiratory samples for viral culture were collected from subjects with influenza-like illness (ILI) during the 2007-2008 season in the U.S.

Results

601 subjects were enrolled. Vaccines were well tolerated. Seroconversion (the percentage of subjects with either (a) a pre-vaccination HAI titer ≤10 and a post-vaccination HAI titer ≥40 or (b) a pre-vaccination titer ≥10 and a minimum four-fold rise in post-vaccination HAI antibody titer) in the TIV and rHA groups, respectively, was obtained in 66% vs. 72% for H1; 44% vs. 61% for H3; and 41% vs. 41% for B. Proportions achieving titers ≥40 were 96% vs. 96% for H1, 75% vs. 85% for H3, and 94% vs. 93% vs. B. Geometric mean titer ratios at day 28 (TIV/rHA) were 0.77 for H1; 0.58 for H3; and 1.05 for B, respectively. ILI frequencies were low and similar in both groups.

Conclusions

Both vaccines were safe and immunogenic. Ab responses vs. H1 and H3 Ags were significantly higher in the rHA group, with similar responses to B. Furthermore, the FluBlok group had a statistically significantly higher seroconversion rate against influenza A/H3N2 compared to the TIV group.     

Immunogenicity and safety of Gardasil among mid-adult aged men (27–45 years)—The MAM Study

BackgroundThe quadrivalent (types 6/11/16/18) human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine, Gardasil, has demonstrated efficacy against persistent HPV infection and associated anogenital disease in males. The goal of this Phase II trial was to establish the immunogenicity and safety of Gardasil among mid-adult men ages 27–45 years.MethodsOne hundred and fifty men from Tampa, FL, US, and Cuernavaca, Mexico who met eligibility criteria (male, 27–45 years old, completed four years of follow-up in the HPV Infection in Men (HIM) natural history study) were enrolled. Subjects completed four visits over seven months, with Gardasil administered at Day 1 and Months 2 and 6. Sera were collected at Day 1 (pre-vaccination) and Month 7 (one month post-dose three). Anti-HPV6, 11, 16, and 18 IgG levels were determined by competitive Luminex immunoassay.Findings100% of men seroconverted to each of the four HPV vaccine components, and the vaccine was generally well-tolerated. Antibody responses to vaccine did not differ by age group or sexual orientation, regardless of HPV type, and were significantly higher at Month 7 among men who entered the trial seropositive for HPV 6 or 11.InterpretationThe immune response to HPV vaccination in men ages 27–45 was comparable to that observed in younger men, in whom clinical efficacy was demonstrated. Further trials to assess the efficacy of HPV vaccines to prevent persistent HPV infections in mid-adult men are needed.FundingMerck & Co. Inc. was the main sponsor of this trial (IISP39256) and provided the study product.     

Immunogenicity and safety of human papillomavirus vaccine coadministered with other vaccines in individuals aged 9–25 years: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IntroductionAdolescents and young adults are at a high risk of developing human papillomavirus (HPV) infections, which can be prevented with the use of vaccines. Moreover, a combined immunization strategy for administration of HPV vaccines with other routine vaccines may lead to better compliance. We aim to comprehensively evaluate immunogenicity and safety in the case of concomitantly administered HPV vaccine in individuals aged 9–25 years.MethodsRelevant studies, published up to December 27, 2018, were identified through searches of Medline/PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Knowledge. The pooled relative risk (RR) of immunogenicity and safety information pertaining to the concomitant administration of HPV vaccines with other routine vaccines in healthy participants aged 9–25 years were evaluated.ResultsA total of 13 papers (11,657 participants) were included in this meta-analysis. The analyses showed that, between the concomitant and nonconcomitant administration groups, the seroconversion rate for the specific antibodies against all HPV types (type 16-, 18-, 6-, 11-, 31-, 33-, 45-, 52-, and 58) were the same (the pooled RR = 1.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) of 1.00–1.00); for the bivalent HPV (2vHPV) vaccine, the risks of local adverse events showed no significant difference (the pooled RR = 1.00, 95%CI: 0.97–1.04), and the risks of systemic adverse events were almost similar (the pooled RR = 1.10, 95% CI: 1.03–1.18); for the non-bivalent HPV (4vHPV and 9vHPV) vaccines, the risks of local adverse events were slightly higher in the concomitant administration groups (the pooled RR = 1.31, 95%CI: 1.17–1.47), and the risks of systemic adverse events were higher in the concomitant administration groups (the pooled RR = 2.09, 95% CI: 1.69–2.59).ConclusionsWe believe that the concomitant administration of other vaccines along with HPV vaccine is acceptable and there is no interference with the immune response to HPV vaccine. Concomitant vaccine administration has the potential to minimize the number of vaccination visits, leading to increased compliance, hence more effective disease prevention.     

Immunogenicity and safety of a two-dose regimen of a combined measles, mumps, rubella and varicella live vaccine (ProQuad(®)) in infants from 9 months of age

Vaccination against measles, mumps, rubella and varicella (MMRV) is currently recommended in developed countries for infants from 12 months of age. However, measles vaccination at 9 months of age is recommended by the WHO in the Expanded Program on Immunization (EPI) schedule and it is therefore possible that MMR or MMRV vaccines might also be given at this age.     

Immunogenicity and safety of the inactivated Japanese encephalitis vaccine IXIARO® in elderly subjects: Open-label,uncontrolled, multi-center,phase 4 study

BackgroundIXIARO® is a Vero cell-derived, inactivated Japanese encephalitis (JE) vaccine licensed mainly in western countries for children and adults traveling to JE endemic areas. Limited immunogenicity and safety data in elderly travelers have been available.ObjectivesTo evaluate safety and immunogenicity of IXIARO in elderly subjects.MethodsOpen-label, single arm, multi-centered study. Two-hundred subjects with good general health, including adequately controlled chronic conditions, received two doses of IXIARO®, 28 days apart. Protective levels of antibodies were tested 42 days after the second dose. Systemic and local adverse events (AEs) were solicited for 7 days after each dose, unsolicited AEs were collected up to day 70 and in a phone call at month 7.Summary of resultsSubjects were aged 64–83 years (median 69.0 years). Nineteen percent of subjects had serious or medically attended AEs up to Day 70 (primary endpoint), none of them causally linked to IXIARO. Solicited local AEs were reported by 33.5% (most common: local tenderness) and solicited systemic AEs by 27% (most common: headache) of subjects. The seroprotection rate was 65% with a geometric mean titre (GMT) of 37. Subjects with tick borne encephalitis (TBE) vaccinations in the past 5 years (N = 29) had a SCR of 90% and GMT of 65.ConclusionsIXIARO is generally well tolerated in the elderly, and the safety profile is largely comparable with younger adults. SCR and GMT are lower compared to younger adults, but SCR is in the range reported in elderly for other vaccines e.g. against TBE, hepatitis-A virus (HAV)/hepatitis-B virus (HBV), influenza. The differences in SCR and GMT from younger to elderly adults were in the range of other vaccines.Duration of protection is uncertain in older persons, therefore a booster dose (third dose) should be considered before any further exposure to JE virus.     

Immunogenicity and safety of a single dose of a CRM-conjugated meningococcal ACWY vaccine in children and adolescents aged 2–18 years in Taiwan: Results of an open label study

Background

MenACWY-CRM (Menveo^®, Novartis Vaccines, Siena, Italy) is a quadrivalent meningococcal conjugate vaccine developed to help prevent invasive meningococcal disease caused by Neisseria meningitidis serogroups A, C, W, and Y. It is approved within the European Union in persons >2 years of age and in persons from 2 months to 55 years of age in the United States, among other countries. Little is known about the immunogenicity and safety of this vaccine in Taiwanese children >2 years and adolescents. This study assessed the immunogenicity and safety of a single injection of MenACWY-CRM vaccine in Taiwanese subjects aged 2–18 years old.

Methods

In this phase III, multicentre, open-label study 341 subjects received one dose of MenACWY-CRM. Immunogenicity measures were rates of seroresponse (defined as the proportion of subjects with a postvaccination hSBA ≥1:8 if the prevaccination (baseline) titre was <1:4, or at least a fourfold higher hSBA titre than baseline if the prevaccination titre was ≥1:4), percentages of subjects with serum bactericidal activity (hSBA) ≥1:8 for serogroups A, C, W and Y and hSBA geometric mean titres (GMTs). Local and systemic reactions and all adverse events (AEs) were recorded for 7 days, and medically attended AEs for 1 month post-vaccination.

Results

Seroresponse rates after MenACWY-CRM vaccination at Day 29 for the serogroups A, C, W, and Y were 83%, 93%, 50%, and 65%, respectively. At Day 29 the percentages of subjects with hSBA ≥1:8 against all four serogroups A, C, W and Y were: 83%, 96%, 96% and 82%, respectively. GMTs against all serogroups rose by ≥7-fold from baseline to Day 29. The vaccine was well tolerated.

Conclusions

A single dose of MenACWY-CRM demonstrated a robust immune response, and an acceptable safety profile in Taiwanese children and adolescents.