Radical prostatectomy versus external beam radiation therapy for high-grade,clinically localized prostate cancer: Emulation of a target clinical trial

PurposeThe comparative effectiveness of surgery and radiation therapy for high-grade, clinically localized prostate cancer remains a seminal, open question in urologic oncology, with no randomized controlled trials to inform management. We therefore emulated a hypothetical target clinical trial of radical prostatectomy (RP) versus external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for high-grade, clinically localized prostate cancer.Materials and MethodsWe conducted observational analyses using the National Cancer Database from 2006-2015 to emulate a target clinical trial in men 55-69 years with cT1-3cN0cM0, PSA<20 ng/mL, Gleason 8 to 10 prostate adenocarcinoma treated with RP or 75 to 81 Gy EBRT with androgen deprivation therapy (EBRT+ADT). The associations of treatment type with overall survival (OS) were estimated using Cox regression with stabilized inverse probability weights (IPW).ResultsA total of 26,806 men formed the study cohort (RP: 23,990; EBRT+ADT: 2,816). Baseline characteristics were well-balanced after IPW-adjustment. Median follow-up was 48.4 (IQR 25.5-76.2) months. After IPW-reweighting, RP was associated with improved OS compared to EBRT+ADT (HR 0.54;95% CI 0.48-0.62; P<0.001), with 5- and 10-year OS of 93% vs 87%, and 76% vs 60%, respectively. RP was associated with improved OS across all categories of Gleason score, PSA, cT stage, age, and Charlson comorbidity index examined. In sensitivity analyses adjusting for biopsy tumor volume and a biopsy-specific Gleason score, RP remained associated with improved OS compared to EBRT+ADT (HR 0.62;95% CI 0.49-0.78; P<0.001).ConclusionsIn observational analyses designed to emulate a target clinical trial of men with high-grade, clinically localized prostate cancer, RP was associated with improved OS compared with EBRT+ADT.     

Psychological distress in men with prostate cancer receiving adjuvant androgen-deprivation therapy

ObjectivesTo compare the occurrence of depression, anxiety, self body image perception, sleep disturbances, and diminished quality of life in prostate cancer patients undergoing adjuvant androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) as opposed to patients in follow-up alone.Methods and materialsHospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group essential diagnostic criteria, Body Image Scale and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Prostate were administered to consecutive prostate cancer patients who underwent radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy and are presently either under adjuvant ADT or included in a follow-up program.ResultsOf the 103 patients enrolled, 49 (47.6%) were receiving adjuvant ADT and 54 (52.4%) were not. Compared with the controls, the patients undergoing ADT showed higher levels of depression (P = 0.002), worse self body image perception (P = 0.001), worse quality of life (P = 0.0001) and worse sleep quality (P = 0.04). ADT was significantly associated with depression at multivariate analysis after adjustment for age, stage, Gleason score, as well as demographic and social variables (P = 0.001). Depression scores showed a strong inverse correlation with quality of life scores (P < 0.01).ConclusionsAdjuvant ADT is associated with depression, worse quality of life, and altered self body image in prostate cancer patients.     

The rising incidence of ductal adenocarcinoma and intraductal carcinoma of the prostate: Diagnostic accuracy of biopsy,MRI-visibility,and outcomes

IntroductionDuctal adenocarcinoma (DA) and intraductal carcinoma (IDC) of the prostate are associated with higher stage disease at radical prostatectomy (RP). We evaluated diagnostic accuracy of biopsy, MRI-visibility, and outcomes for patients undergoing RP with DA/IDC histology compared to pure acinar adenocarcinoma (AA) of the prostate.Materials and MethodsA retrospective cohort study of men receiving RP between 2014 and 2021 revealing AA, DA, or IDC on final pathology was conducted. Multivariable logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards regression models were employed.ResultsA total of 609 patients were included with 103 found to have DA/IDC. Patients with DA/IDC were older and had higher PSA, biopsy grade group (GG), RP GG, and other pathologic findings (extraprostatic extension, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, pN stage) compared to AA patients (all P < 0.05). On multivariable analysis, higher age, RP GG, and pT3a were associated with DA/IDC on RP (all P < 0.05). Sensitivity and specificity of biopsy compared to RP for diagnosis of DA/IDC was 29.1% (16.7% DA, 27.8% IDC) and 96.6% (99.3% DA, 96.6% IDC), respectively. In a subset of 281 men receiving MRI, PI-RADS distribution was similar for patients with DA/IDC vs. AA (90.7% vs. 80.7% with PI-RADS 4–5 lesions, P = 0.23) with slightly higher biopsy sensitivity (41.9%). DA/IDC was associated with worse BCR (HR = 1.77, P = 0.02) but not biopsy DA/IDC (P = 0.90).ConclusionsSensitivity of prostate biopsy was low for detection of DA/IDC histology at RP. Patients with DA/IDC histology had unfavorable pathologic features at RP and worse BCR. Of patients with DA/IDC at RP, 90.7% were categorized as PI-RADS 4 to 5 on preoperative MRI.     

Do androgen-directed therapies improve outcomes in prostate cancer patients undergoing radical prostatectomy? A systematic review and meta-analysis

IntroductionApproximately 50% of patients with non-metastatic prostate cancer are treated with radical prostatectomy (RP). While some men will be cured with surgery alone, a substantial proportion will experience cancer recurrence. Androgen-directed therapy (ADT) is an effective adjuvant therapy for patients treated with prostate radiation. Comparatively, the efficacy of ADT in surgical patients has not been well-studied.MethodsA systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from inception to July 2020 was performed. Randomized trials comparing ADT with RP vs. prostatectomy alone in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer were included. Neoadjuvant ADT and adjuvant ADT interventions were assessed separately. The primary outcomes were cancer recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Pathological outcomes following neoadjuvant ADT were also evaluated.ResultsFifteen randomized trials met eligibility criteria; 11 evaluated neoadjuvant ADT (n=2322) and four evaluated adjuvant ADT (n=5205). Neoadjuvant ADT (three months of treatment) did not improve RFS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.90, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.74–1.11) or OS (HR 1.22, 95% CI 0.62–2.41). Neoadjuvant ADT significantly decreased the risk of positive surgical margins (relative risk [RR] 0.48, 95% CI 0.41–0.56) and extraprostatic tumor extension (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.64–0.89). Adjuvant ADT improved RFS (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.45–0.93) but did not improve OS (HR 1.02, 95% CI 0.84–1.24).ConclusionsNeoadjuvant ADT causes a pathological downstaging of prostate tumors but has not been found to delay cancer recurrence nor extend survival. Few studies have evaluated adjuvant ADT. Trials are needed to determine the benefits and harms of intermediate- or long-term adjuvant ADT for RP patients.     

PSMA PET predicts metastasis-free survival in the setting of salvage radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy

IntroductionTo evaluate the impact of PSMA PET (prostate specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography) findings prior to salvage radiotherapy (SRT) in recurrent prostate cancer (PCa) after radical prostatectomy (RP) on metastasis-free survival (MFS).Patients and methodsBetween 01/2012 and 12/2018, 1,599 patients received SRT for biochemical recurrence after RP at our institution. Five-year MFS of “positive PSMA PET” (n = 49) vs. “negative PSMA PET” (n = 106) vs. “no PSMA PET” (n = 1,599) prior to SRT was determined. For all time to event analyses, uni- and multivariable Cox's proportional hazards models and univariable Kaplan-Meier analyses were applied, with a significance threshold of P < 0.05. Further 4:1 propensity score matching for patient, cancer and treatment characteristics was performed to account for residual differences between groups.ResultsOf PSMA PET patients, 106 patients exhibited “negative PSMA PET” (68.4%) and 49 exhibited “positive PSMA PET” (31.6%). Median PSA at recurrence did not differ between groups (0.2 ng/ml; P= 0.4). After 4:1 propensity score matching, 5-year MFS between “no PSMA PET” and “negative PSMA PET” was 94.4 vs. 93.0%, respectively (P = 0.8). For “no PSMA PET” versus “positive PSMA PET”, 5-year MFS was significantly lower in “positive PSMA PET” (92.3 vs. 48.5%, respectively P < 0.0001). Finally, “positive PSMA PET” was independently associated with worse MFS compared to “no PSMA PET” after multivariable adjustment in the overall cohort (HR 13.8, CI 7.5–25.2, P < 0.001).ConclusionsLocoregional positive PSMA PET findings in recurrent patients after RP are highly predictive of worse MFS in the setting of SRT.     

Impact of performance status on efficacy of systemic therapy for prostate cancer: a meta-analysis

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy of systemic therapies in patients with worse performance status (PS) treated for high-risk non-metastatic prostate cancer (PCa), metastatic hormone-sensitive PCa (mHSPC), and non-metastatic/metastatic castration-resistant PCa (nmCRPC/mCRPC), as there is sparse pooled data showing the effect of PS on oncological outcomes in patients with PCa.

Methods

Three databases were queried in June 2022 for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) analysing patients with PCa treated with systemic therapy (i.e., adding androgen receptor signalling inhibitor [ARSI] or docetaxel [DOC] to androgen-deprivation therapy [ADT]). We analysed the oncological outcomes of patients with PCa with worse PS, defined as Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group PS ≥ 1, treated with combination therapies and compared these to patients with good PS. The main outcomes of interest were overall survival (OS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), and progression-free survival.

Results

Overall, 25 and 18 RCTs were included for systematic review and meta-analyses/network meta-analyses, respectively. In all clinical settings, combination systemic therapies significantly improved OS in patients with worse PS as well as in those with good PS, while the MFS benefit from ARSI in the nmCRPC setting was more pronounced in patients with good PS than in those with worse PS (P = 0.002). Analysis of treatment ranking in patients with mHSPC revealed that triplet therapy had the highest likelihood of improved OS irrespective of PS; specifically, adding darolutamide to DOC + ADT had the highest likelihood of improved OS in patients with worse PS. Analyses were limited by the small proportion of patients with a PS ≥ 1 (19%–28%) and that the number of PS 2 was rarely reported.

Conclusions

Among RCTs, novel systemic therapies seem to benefit the OS of patients with PCa irrespective of PS. Our findings suggest that worse PS should not discourage treatment intensification across all disease stages.     

The addition of chemotherapy in the definitive management of high risk prostate cancer

In attempt to improve long-term disease control outcomes for high-risk prostate cancer, numerous clinical trials have tested the addition of chemotherapy (CTX)—either adjuvant or neoadjuvant—to definitive local therapy, either radical prostatectomy (RP) or radiation therapy (RT).Neoadjuvant trials generally confirm safety, feasibility, and pre-RP PSA reduction, but rates of pathologic complete response are rare, and no indications for neoadjuvant CTX have been firmly established. Adjuvant regimens have included CTX alone or in combination with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT).Here we provide a review of the relevant literature, and also quantify utilization of CTX in the definitive management of localized high-risk prostate cancer by querying the National Cancer Data Base. Between 2004 and 2013, 177 patients (of 29,659 total) treated with definitive RT, and 995 (of 367,570 total) treated with RP had CTX incorporated into their treatment regimens. Low numbers of RT?+?CTX patients precluded further analysis of this population, but we investigated the impact of CTX on overall survival (OS) for patients treated with RP +/? CTX. Disease-free survival or biochemical-recurrence-free survival are not available through the National Cancer Data Base. Propensity-score matching was conducted as patients treated with CTX were a higher-risk group. For nonmatched groups, OS at 5-years was 89.6% for the CTX group vs. 95.6%, for the no-CTX group (P < 0.01). The difference in OS between CTX and no-CTX groups did not persist after propensity-score matching, with 5-year OS 89.6% vs. 90.9%, respectively (Hazard ratio 0.99; P?=?0.88).In summary, CTX was not shown to improve OS in this retrospective study. Multimodal regimens—such as RP followed by ADT, RT, and CTX; or RT in conjunction with ADT followed by CTX—have shown promise, but long-term follow-up of randomized data is required.     

Rise in serum folate after androgen deprivation associated with worse prostate cancer-specific survival

IntroductionHigh folate has an association with advanced prostate cancer and levels of testosterone. Herein, we perform a translational study to investigate the inverse response of serum folate in prostate cancer patients initiating androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and a mirrored animal model.MethodsA retrospective study was performed using the South Texas Veterans Healthcare System to identify patients with prostate cancer on ADT. We documented testosterone and folate levels before and after ADT initiation (defined by a reduction in testosterone by 50 ng/ml) as compared to those already on ADT (maintenance). Our primary outcome was overall mortality with secondary outcome of prostate cancer-specific mortality. In parallel, we tested castration of C57BL/6J mice on folate-defined diet to determine if folate levels change with response to androgen deprivation. Students’ t test on continuous variables and Chi-squared test on dichotomous variables was performed along with Kaplan-Meier for time to event analysis.ResultsWe identified 56 men with prostate cancer undergoing androgen deprivation in which folate levels had been determined. 15 out of 16 (94%) men initiating ADT had increases in their folate, which is substantially more than 67% in maintenance group (P = 0.04). We identified more rapid time to death from prostate cancer if folate levels increased to levels >200 ng/ml above their baseline (P = 0.03). Mice models demonstrated a significant rise in serum red blood cell folate after mice were castrated (P = 0.03) by an average of 1.5x over pre-castrated baseline level. By contrast, sham-castrated mice showed no increase in serum folate levels over baseline.ConclusionOur study suggests that men with substantial rises in folate after initiating ADT may be associated with worse prostate cancer-specific and overall survival. Our translational experiments in mice confirmed correlation between rising in folate levels post-castration. Given this study, further investigation is warranted on the role of dietary folate consumption during initiation of ADT and progression to castrate-resistant prostate cancer.     

Effects of perineural invasion on biochemical recurrence and prostate cancer-specific survival in patients treated with definitive external beam radiotherapy

Objectives

Perineural invasion (PNI) has not yet gained universal acceptance as an independent predictor of adverse outcomes for prostate cancer treated with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). We analyzed the prognostic influence of PNI for a large institutional cohort of prostate cancer patients who underwent EBRT with and without androgen deprivation therapy (ADT).

Oncologic outcomes of organ-confined Gleason grade group 4-5 prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy

BackgroundOrgan-confined prostate cancer (CaP) at radical prostatectomy (RP) is associated with good long-term outcomes. However, information for aggressive Gleason organ-confined CaP is scant. To investigate the impact of Gleason grade group (GG) 4-5 on long-term oncologic outcomes after RP.MethodsWithin a high-volume center database we identified patients who harbored organ-confined CaP (pT2) at RP between 1992 and 2017. Only patients with negative surgical margins, without lymph node invasion and without neo- and/or adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy and/or adjuvant radiotherapy were included. Patients with GG1 were excluded. Kaplan-Meier analyses and Cox regression models tested the effect of GG4 and GG5 on biochemical recurrence-free (BFS), metastasis-free (MFS), overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific mortality (CSM) free survival.Results and limitationsOf 10,855 identified pT2 patients, 0.1% (n=81) and 0.1% (n=114) harbored GG4 and GG5, respectively. At 10-years after RP, BFS, MFS, OS and CSM-free rates were 80.3 vs. 68.6 vs. 55.4% (P<0.001), 96.7 vs. 89.9. vs. 83.4% (P<0.001), 93.2 vs. 78.3 vs. 72.6% (P<0.001) and 99.3 vs. 98.0 vs. 82.7% (P<0.001) for GG2 and GG3 vs. GG4 vs. GG5, respectively. In multivariable Cox regression models, GG5 represented an independent predictor for biochemical recurrence (Hazard ratio [HR] 3.00, P<0.001), metastasis (HR 5.01, P<0.001), death (HR 2.72, P<0.01) and cancer-specific death (HR 30.1, P<0.001). Conversely, GG4 represented an independent predictor for death (HR 2.10, P=0.04) and cancer-specific death (HR 6.09, P=0.01) but not for biochemical recurrence and metastasis.ConclusionGG4/5 in organ-confined CaP is rare. But its associated with worse oncologic outcomes after RP, namely biochemical recurrence, metastasis, death and cancer-specific death. Patients with organ-confined GG4/5 and negative margins should be closely followed and may be candidates for risk stratification by genomic markers.     

Perineural invasion detection in prostate biopsy is related to recurrence-free survival in patients submitted to radical prostatectomy

ObjectivePerineural invasion (PNI) is detected in almost 20% of prostate biopsies and has been related to worse prognostic factors in radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens and lower disease-free survival rates. The aim of this study was to evaluate the importance of PNI during periods of extended prostate biopsies and to determine the value of this preoperative parameter as a predictor of pathologic findings in surgical specimens and in biochemical recurrence.Materials and methodsBetween 2001 and 2009, 599 prostate biopsies and their respective RP specimens were examined in our laboratory. The RP specimens were always examined completely. The mean age of the patients was 61 years, and the mean PSA was 6.4 ng/mL. The mean and median number of biopsy cores obtained was 14.4 and 14, respectively. PNI was identified in 105 biopsies (17.5%). We studied the ability of PNI in prostate biopsies to determine the tumor stage in surgical specimens and the relationship of PNI with biochemical recurrence during a mean follow-up time of 51.4 months.ResultsThe presence of PNI in prostate biopsies was observed in older patients (63 vs. 61 years old, P = 0.008). All of the prognostic factors determined for the RP specimens were significantly worse in patients with PNI compared with those without PNI. PNI was strongly associated with a higher pathologic stage (87% specificity, 40% sensitivity, odds ratio 4.8). Stage pT3 prostatic cancer was determined in 46 (43.8%) of 105 patients with PNI on biopsy compared to 69 (14%) of 494 patients without PNI (P = 0.01). Fifty-six (19.6%) patients had a biochemical recurrence, and PNI correlated significantly with PSA recurrence. A Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a significant difference in recurrence-free survival between patients with and without PNI (45% vs. 53%, respectively, P = 0.021, log-rank test = 0.19).ConclusionPNI is an important morphologic preoperative predictor of the pathologic stage as well as biochemical recurrence and must always be mentioned when adenocarcinoma is diagnosed on prostate biopsies.     

Feasibility and outcome of radical prostatectomy following inductive neoadjuvant therapy in patients with suspicion of rectal infiltration

ObjectiveTo determine the feasibility and outcome of radical prostatectomy (RP) following neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) in patients with initial inoperable, rectum-infiltrating cT4 prostate cancer (PCa).MethodsFrom 01/2018 to 12/2020, 26 patients with clinical (DRE) or radiographical (mpMRI) suspicion of rectum infiltrating PCa at diagnosis and NAT prior to RP were retrospectively identified from our prospective institutional database. Two patients were still inoperable after NAT. Downsizing was administered for at least 20 weeks and RP was performed after excluding ongoing rectal infiltration.ResultsAt diagnosis, median PSA was 42.5 ng/ml (IQR: 23.0–66.1). Inductive NAT consisted of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in combination with chemotherapy (n = 9) or without chemotherapy (n = 14). Median preoperative PSA was 0.93 ng/ml (IQR: 0.24–0.40). Median time from NAT to RP was 6 months (IQR: 5–7). Two patients were still inoperable after NAT. Of 24 patients undergoing RP, abortion of surgery due to inoperability was observed in 2 patients (8.4%), demonstrating a total failure rate of NAT in 4 out of 26 patients (15.4%). One patient suffered a rectal injury with consecutive colostomy (4.2%). No Clavien-Dindo complication Grade IV or V were observed. Urinary continence was achieved in 16 patients (84.2%). Sufficient erection for sexual intercourse was present in 2 patients (10.5%). All patients received adjuvant ADT with or without radiation therapy. Median PSA at 13 months was 0.08 ng/ml (IQR: 0.01–0.74).ConclusionRP of initially rectum infiltrating PCa is feasible and safe after inductive NAT, however complications rates tend to be higher compared to standard RP.     

Correlation of Prostate-specific Antigen Kinetics with Overall Survival and Radiological Progression-free Survival in Metastatic Castration-sensitive Prostate Cancer Treated with Abiraterone Acetate plus Prednisone or Placebos Added to Androgen Deprivation Therapy: Post Hoc Analysis of Phase 3 LATITUDE Study

BackgroundLATITUDE, a randomized, double-blind trial, compared abiraterone acetate and prednisone (AAP) + androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) versus placebo (PBO) + ADT in high-risk metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC).ObjectiveTo assess the correlation of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) kinetics with overall survival (OS) and radiological progression-free survival (rPFS).Design, setting, and participantsA post hoc analysis of data from 597 men receiving AAP + ADT and 602 receiving PBO + ADT.Outcome measurements and statistical analysisThe associations of PSA-related outcomes (rates of confirmed 50% [PSA50] and 90% [PSA90] decline from baseline PSA [Prostate Cancer Working Group 2 criteria], rates of PSA < 0.2 ng/ml, median nadir PSA, time to PSA nadir [TPN], and time to PSA progression [TPP] with long-term outcomes [OS and rPFS]) were evaluated. Hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated using Cox proportional hazard model. Correlations of TPP with coprimary endpoints rPFS and OS were evaluated using Kendall’s tau (KT).Results and limitationsAAP + ADT significantly delayed median TPP versus PBO + ADT (33.2 vs 7.4 mo; HR: 0.3, p < 0.001). TPP correlated with rPFS (KT = 0.921) and OS (KT = 0.666). In the AAP + ADT group, 91% had PSA50 and 79% had PSA90 responses (relative risk [RR]: 1.36 and 2.30, respectively; p < 0.001 for both comparisons vs PBO + ADT). Compared with nonresponders, PSA50 and PSA90 responders had reduced risk of death (RR: 0.44 and 0.12, respectively). At 6 mo, 40% receiving AAP + ADT and 6.5% receiving PBO + ADT achieved PSA ≤0.1 ng/ml, which was significantly associated with longer rPFS and OS. Median nadir PSA was 0.09 ng/ml with AAP + ADT versus 2.36 ng/ml with PBO + ADT. Median TPN (AAP + ADT, 6.4 mo; PBO + ADT, 3.8 mo) positively correlated with rPFS and OS.ConclusionsSuperior PSA response dynamics with AAP + ADT versus ADT + PBO strongly correlated with long-term outcomes of rPFS and OS in high-risk mCSPC.Patient summaryWe found that low prostate-specific antigen levels (≤0.1 ng/ml) after 6 mo may indicate a good long-term response to treatment. Our results need confirmation.     

The role of lymphovascular space invasion in renal cell carcinoma as a prognostic marker of survival after curative resection

ObjectivesLymphovascular invasion (LVI) correlates with adverse outcomes in numerous malignancies. However, its role in predicting outcomes in RCC is unclear. Herein, we evaluated what effect LVI had on metastasis free survival (MFS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and overall survival (OS) in patients with RCC treated with surgical excision.MethodsEight hundred forty-one consecutive patients who underwent partial or radical nephrectomy from 1989 to 2004 were identified. Pathologic and gross features examined were LVI, subtype, Fuhrman grade, stage, and size. Age and gender were also analyzed. Slides were re-reviewed by a single pathologist (MS). Variables with P < 0.1 on univariate analysis were incorporated in a Cox proportional hazards multivariate model. MFS, DSS, and OS were described for patients with and without LVI using the Kaplan-Meier method, and compared with the log-rank test.ResultsLVI was seen on H and E stained slides in 91 patients (11%); 120 (14%) developed metastatic disease, 91 (11%) died of RCC, and 306 (36%) died during a median follow-up of 61 months. While on univariate analysis, LVI was strongly associated with decreased MFS, DSS, and OS (P < 0.0001), on multivariate analysis, LVI was no longer statistically significant for MFS, DSS, and OS with a HR of 0.976 (95% CI: 0.583–1.63; P = 0.93), 0.96 (95% CI: 0.542–1.69; P = 0.88), and 1.24 (95% CI: 0.869–1.77; P = 0.24).ConclusionsWe found LVI to be associated with worse MFS, DSS, and OS on univariate analysis, but not on multivariate analysis for patients with nonmetastatic RCC. In contrast to previously reported studies, LVI may not be an independent prognostic variable in patients with localized RCC.     

Outcomes with brachytherapy based dose escalation for gleason 8 versus 9-10 prostate cancer: An NCDB analysis

IntroductionThe addition of brachytherapy (BT) in high risk prostate cancer is supported by Level 1 evidence. Whether all high risk patients benefit from BT to the same extent is unknown. The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was used to investigate overall survival (OS) differences between GS 8 and 9-10 treated with external beam radiation (EBRT) only or BT +/- EBRT.Materials and MethodsWe included localized prostate adenocarcinoma definitively treated with radiation between 2004-2014. Patients were stratified into various radiation treatment groups: EBRT 7560 - 8640 cGy, EBRT 5940 - 7540 cGy, and BT +/- EBRT. All EBRT only and BT +/- EBRT patients received ADT. A multivariable Cox proportional hazard model was used to assess OS. Propensity score matching was used to account for differences between groups. Median survival was determined based on Kaplan-Meier survival curves.Results30,698 patients were included. On multivariable analysis among GS 8 patients, BT was associated with improved OS compared to 7560 - 8640 cGy (HR–0.80 (95% CI 0.70-0.92, P = 0.002). In Gleason 9-10 BT did not result in improved OS compared to 7560 – 8640 cGy (HR- 0.91 (95% CI 0.79 – 1.05, P = 0.212). Results remained significant with propensity score matching and removing patients with medical comorbidities.ConclusionBT was associated with improved OS when compared to 7560 – 8640 cGy in GS 8, but not in Gleason 9-10 disease. This hypothesis generating study suggests there may be variable benefit with BT in high risk prostate cancer patients on OS. Future prospective studies are needed to investigate whether the benefit of BT is similar across all high risk prostate cancer patients.     

Enzalutamida y apalutamida en el tratamiento del cáncer de próstata no metastásico resistente a la castración: comparación indirecta de la eficacia

ObjectivesTo perform an adjusted indirect comparison of the efficacy of enzalutamide and apalutamide in patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) with a high risk of progression to metastatic disease.Material and methodsAfter carrying out a literature search, we performed an adjusted indirect comparison (Bucher et al.) of the relative efficacy of enzalutamide and apalutamide in patients with nmCRPC with a high risk of progression to metastatic disease. The outcomes included were metastasis-free survival (MFS) and PSA response rate (PSARR).ResultsThere were no statistically significant differences between enzalutamide and apalutamide regarding the analysed outcomes. For the comparison enzalutamide + ADT vs. apalutamide + ADT: MFS a HR (95% CI) = 1,036 (0.781-1.373) was obtained. For PSARR, a RR (95% CI) = 0.81 (0.339-1.938) was obtained.ConclusionsThe adjusted indirect comparison performed in this study shows that there are no statistically significant differences in terms of efficacy regarding MFS and PSARR between enzalutamide + ADT and apalutamide + ADT in patients with nmCRPC with a high risk of progression to metastatic disease. However, in order to confirm these results, an independent trial with direct comparison between both drugs would be required.     

Patient risk stratification using Gleason score concordance and upgrading among men with prostate biopsy Gleason score 6 or 7

PurposeTo define the impact of discordant Gleason sum (GS) between prostate biopsy (Pbx) tissue and radical prostatectomy (RP) specimen among men initially diagnosed with Gleason 6 or 7 prostate adenocarcinoma.Materials and methodsWe evaluated patients diagnosed with GS 6 or 7 and treated primarily with RP. We defined the frequency of GS discordance between Pbx and RP pathology reports. We analyzed pretreatment parameters associated with GS discordance and compared immediate postprostatectomy outcome variables across patient groups defined by their GS and concordance. We then conducted survival analysis for biochemical recurrence across patient groups defined by their GS and concordance status.ResultsAmong patients with GS 6 on Pbx, 681/1,847 (36.86%) patients were upgraded to GS 7 or higher after RP. Surgical margin, capsular involvement, seminal vesicle, and nodal involvement status were more favorable in patients with concordant Pbx and RP specimen with GS 6 (P < 0.0001). Patients with smaller transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) prostate volume were found to have higher PSA densities and were more likely to be upgraded at RP. Multivariate survival analysis also predicted fewer biochemical recurrence events over time in men with concordant Pbx tissue and RP specimen of GS 6 vs. 6/7 or 7/7 (P = 0.0025) controlling for other relevant covariates.ConclusionsGS discordance between Pbx tissue and RP specimens among prostate cancer patients initially diagnosed with either GS 6 or 7 adenocarcinoma of the prostate is substantial. This discordance has potential clinical significance in predicting oncologic outcomes.     

Indirect Comparisons of Efficacy between Combination Approaches in Metastatic Hormone-sensitive Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

ContextThere have been substantial changes in the management of men with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) over the past 5 yr, with upfront combination therapies replacing androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) alone. A range of therapies have entered the space with no clear answer regarding their comparative efficacy.ObjectiveTo perform a systematic review and network meta-analysis to characterise the comparative efficacy of combination approaches in men with mHSPC.Evidence acquisitionWe searched multiple databases and abstracts of major meetings up to June 2019 for randomised trials of patients receiving first-line therapy for metastatic disease, a combination of ADT and one (or more) of taxane-based chemotherapy, and androgen receptor-targeted therapies. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) and we evaluated progression-free survival as a secondary outcome. We performed subgroup analysis based on the volume of disease.Evidence synthesisWe found seven trials that met our eligibility criteria using either docetaxel, abiraterone acetate, enzalutamide, or apalutamide in combination with ADT. All agents in combination with ADT were shown to be superior to ADT alone; enzalutamide + ADT had the lowest absolute hazard ratio compared with ADT only (hazards ratio 0.53, 95% confidence interval 0.37–0.75), and an estimated 76.9% probability that it is the preferred treatment to prolong OS compared with other combination treatments, or with ADT alone. Enzalutamide appeared to have better OS compared with docetaxel in men with low-volume disease, but there was no difference in other comparisons.ConclusionsCombination therapy with any of docetaxel, abiraterone acetate, enzalutamide, or apalutamide provides a significant OS benefit when compared with ADT alone. We did not identify significant differences in OS between different combination therapies. Subtle differences between these options provide clinicians considerable flexibility when selecting options for individual patients.Patient summaryMany men with metastatic, hormone-sensitive prostate cancer should be managed with upfront combination therapy instead of androgen-deprivation therapy alone. Clinicians may consider many factors during the decision-making process, and thus management should be tailored for patients individually.     

Evaluation of the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic indicator in a European cohort of patients with prostate cancer treated with radiotherapy

ObjectivesRecent evidence suggests that the presence of a systemic inflammatory response plays an important role in the progression of several solid tumors. The platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) has been proposed as an easily assessable marker of systemic inflammation and has been shown to represent a prognostic marker in different cancer entities. To evaluate the prognostic value of the PLR in prostate cancer, we performed the present study.Methods and materialsData from 374 consecutive patients with prostate cancer, treated with 3D conformal radiotherapy from 1999 to 2007, were analyzed. Distant metastases–free survival (MFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), overall survival (OS), biochemical disease–free survival, and time to salvage systemic therapy were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazards analysis was performed to calculate hazard ratio (HR) and 95% CI. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed to adjust for other covariates.ResultsUsing receiver operating characteristics analysis, the optimal cutoff level for the PLR was 190. Kaplan-Meier analyses revealed that PLR≥190 was a prognostic factor for decreased MFS (P = 0.004), CSS (P = 0.004), and OS (P = 0.024) whereas a significant association of an elevated PLR with biochemical disease–free survival (P = 0.740) and time to salvage systemic therapy (P = 0.063) was not detected. In multivariate analysis, an increased PLR remained a significant prognostic factor for poor MFS (HR = 2.24, 95% CI: 1.06–4.76, P = 0.036), CSS (HR = 3.99, 95% CI: 1.19–13.4, P = 0.025), and OS (HR = 1.87, 95% CI: 1.02–3.42, P = 0.044).ConclusionsOur findings indicate that the PLR may predict prognosis in patients with prostate cancer and may contribute to future individual risk assessment in them.     

Use of combined androgen deprivation therapy with postoperative radiation treatment for prostate cancer: Impact of randomized trials on clinical practice

PurposeTo assess the impact of RTOG-9601 and GETUG-AFU-16 on the routine use of combination androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) for prostate cancer (CaP).Material and methodsPatients with localized CaP treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) and PORT with or without ADT at a comprehensive cancer center from January 2006 to June 2007 (Period 1 = P1), July 2011 to December 2012 (Period 2 = P2), and January 2017 to June 2018 (Period 3 = P3) were included. Clinicopathologic features and treatment characteristics were analyzed and compared. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess prognostic factors and association with ADT use. Statistical tests were two-sided and a P value <0.05 was considered significant. To validate the findings, United States National Cancer Database (NCDB) and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data were collected to assess rates of combined ADT and PORT from 2004 to 2015.ResultsFive hundred and two patients were included: 152 (P1), 185 (P2), and 165 (P3). PORT was most commonly delivered as early SRT (delivered >1 year post-RP with undetectable PSA or PSA >0.05 and ≤0.5 ng/ml) in all periods. The use of combination PORT and ADT increased over time: 14.5% (P1), 32% (P2), and 41% (P3) (P < 0.001). The proportion of patients that met eligibility criteria for either GETUG-AFU-16 or RTOG-9601 decreased from 47% (P1) to 35% (P3) (P = 0.04). International Society of Urological Pathology grade ≥4 (P < 0.002) and pre-PORT PSA >0.5 ng/ml (P < 0.001) were associated with use of ADT. Positive surgical margin status had a negative association (RR 0.5, P < 0.002). The NCDB demonstrated similar trends for use of combined ADT with PORT, increasing from 37% to 49% from 2004 to 2015.ConclusionThe use of combined ADT with PORT increased over time. However, only a third of contemporary patients undergoing PORT are represented in the major trials supporting the evidence for combination treatment, highlighting the need to characterize the modern impact of this intensification strategy.