Supraclavicular metastases from distant primaries: what is the role of the head and neck surgeon?

Suspicious malignant supraclavicular lymphadenopathy provides a challenge for diagnosis and treatment. The wide variety of primary tumours that metastasise to this region should alert the clinician to look beyond the head and neck, particularly if it is the only site in the neck with suspected disease. As metastatic spread to these nodes from primaries not in the head and neck often indicates wide spread disease, neck dissection is controversial. In this article we review the lymphatic anatomy and discuss the investigation of supraclavicular lymphadenopathy. We discuss the evidence for the management of the neck in patients with subclavicular primary cancers (excluding lymphoma and melanoma) and the role of neck dissection.     

Findings from an OMFS journal club: is COVID-19 the catalyst we have needed to embrace technology?

The COVID-19 outbreak has rapidly progressed into a worldwide pandemic, and the need for social distancing has changed the way we learn and work. Our monthly OMFS journal club has been no different, and is currently meeting on the video conferencing application Microsoft Teams. The use of a virtual setting for training in medicine and dentistry is not new and, as in the case of our recent move to a virtual medium, it may be that COVID-19 has fast-tracked this digital transformation. There are of course disadvantages to online teaching that traditional face-to-face teaching overcomes. We conducted a survey to examine how trainees' attitudes and experiences have altered with this change, and to understand whether some elements of this new style of training may be advantageous in the post-pandemic world. We aimed to assess trainees’ attitudes towards online teaching, and which elements, if any, would be beneficial once face-to-face teaching becomes possible again. A survey was created for all trainees taking part in journal club meetings at Bradford Teaching Hospitals. Multiple-choice and Likert scale questions were designed to ascertain the differences in experience between online and face-to-face settings. A Wilcoxon matched pairs signed test was used to analyse the results. Responses were kept anonymous. Results showed that the majority of trainees found it easier to attend the online journal club, and also indicated that the most found Microsoft Teams easy to use, though we did not have another online application for comparison. There was no significant difference in participation comfort between the two settings, though trainees felt that the online setting considerably improved learning effectiveness. Furthermore, 79% (11/14) thought that online tutorials and meetings should replace traditional face-to-face meetings in the future. The use of internet technology such as video conferencing is not new, and although journal clubs are typically held in academic institutions, online and virtual clubs are flourishing. With an array of advantages, there is no shying away from the trend to move our teaching to a virtual medium. COVID-19 may have just provided the stimulus that has forced this transformation to accelerate.     

Is total nodal yield in neck dissections influenced by the method of specimen presentation to the pathologist?

Excision of the lymphatic structures in the neck is an integral part of the management of many head and neck cancers. Some surgeons dissect the specimens intraoperatively and send the groups of lymph nodes to the histopathologists in separate pots; others provide only a complete en bloc lymphadenectomy and rely on the pathologist to identify the anatomical areas. We aimed to find out whether the method by which specimens are presented to the histopathologist influenced the total nodal yield in neck dissections. Eighty-seven consecutive neck dissections were compared and information collated as to how the specimens were presented to the histopathologist. The mean total yield was 33 (range 15-57). There was no significant difference in total nodal yield between specimens presented to the pathologist either en bloc or in individual groups (p=0.4). Although specimens of neck dissections divided intraoperatively and presenting in nodal groups to the histopathologist in separate pots most probably permits more accurate anatomical assessment, it does not influence the total yield.     

Head and neck oncological ablation and reconstruction in the COVID-19 era – our experience to date

The COVID-19 pandemic has caused unprecedented disruption to the routine operations of healthcare services across the world. As the potential duration of the pandemic remains uncertain, the need to develop strategies to continue urgent elective services has received increasing attention. A solution adopted in the Kent, Sussex and Surrey area of England has been to create COVID-19-protected cancer hubs. The Queen Victoria Hospital is the designated hub for head and neck cancer services in the area. We report on the evolution of the head and neck cancer care pathway and standard operating protocols put in place and how these have combined both national guidelines and local problem solving. It is hoped that our experience can help guide other centres as they re-establish head and neck cancer services during the ongoing pandemic.     

Are you surgically current? Lessons from aviation for returning to non-urgent surgery following COVID-19

The COVID-19 crisis has caused many issues across healthcare. In surgery, many operations have been cancelled with some surgeons losing their regular operating lists. During this time, technical expertise and decision making can deteriorate. In aviation after a prolonged period of absence from flying, this deficit in keeping skills and thinking up to date is known as being “out of currency” or “not current”. Although aviation and healthcare cannot be compared, numerous human factors concepts are applicable to both. In this article, we explore the likely impact of potentially prolonged absences in operating on surgical skills and psyche, and introduce the concept of a Surgical Skills Currency Barometer. We also discuss a “task-o-meter” thought experiment, and suggest practices which could be adopted to help protect surgeon workload from exceeding surgical capability when returning to operating following a period of prolonged absence.     

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on orthognathic patients: What have we learned?

Due to the COVID-19 pandemic orthognathic surgery was suspended in the UK. The effect this had on patients, to date, is unknown. A multi-centre, cross-sectional survey was conducted in the UK to investigate the health-related impact on patients on the orthognathic surgery pathway, including those on the waiting list for surgery. A structured questionnaire was designed to explore the impact of the pandemic on patients whose orthognathic treatment was temporarily cancelled. Ninety-five questionnaires were returned giving a response rate of 65%. When asked if the delay due to the pandemic had caused emotional distress, 63% (51/81) agreed. During the pandemic respondents experienced more distress in relation to dental appearance (60%, 51/83), self-confidence (52% 50/83), facial appearance (53%, 44/83), and ability to eat and chew (59%, 50/83). One hundred percent of patients would have appliances fitted or their appliances adjusted during the pandemic, and 93% stated that they would attend for surgery if they were offered this during the pandemic. In conclusion, patients appear to have experienced emotional distress in relation to the delay with their orthognathic treatment. They should be given greater priority during the remobilisation of elective surgery and should have access to ongoing psychological support when delays affect their treatment. The ‘surgery-first’ approach may be considered for suitable patients to minimise the duration of the treatment journey.     

Outcomes of open temporomandibular joint surgery following failure to improve after arthroscopy: is there an algorithm for success?

We reviewed the results of one surgeon's experience of open surgical management of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) in patients who fail to respond to arthroscopy and aimed to identify groups of patients that may or may not benefit from the intervention. Over a 7-year period (2005–2012) we retrospectively collected data from the medical notes of patients who underwent discectomy, disc plication, eminectomy, eminoplasty, and adhesiolysis, according to the clinical findings for joint pain, restriction, and locking. A total of 22 patients (71%) reported improvement in pain score and 19 (61%) reported an improvement in mouth opening 12 months postoperatively. Overall, 12 patients (39%) ultimately needed TMJ replacement. This group included 5/6 patients in Wilkes’ stage IV and 6/15 in stage V, 5/7 patients with a preoperative pain score of 90–100, and half of those with preoperative mouth opening of 20–29 mm (7/14). Open surgical management of the TMJ can benefit patients despite the previous failure of arthroscopy to manage pain, restriction, and locking. Arthroscopy seems to reduce the percentage of patients that need open TMJ surgery, but also the success of subsequent operations compared with previous studies. TMJ replacement is increasingly being done successfully to treat end-stage disease. These results may be used when obtaining a patient's consent for open TMJ surgery, particularly if they are in the groups considered to have a high risk of subsequently requiring a replacement joint.     

Use of an 'osteocompressor' to avoid damage to the inferior alveolar nerve in the mandibular setback procedure: can the positive effects of osteodistraction be used in reverse? An experimental study in dogs

We have designed an osteocompressor to try and avoid damage to the inferior alveolar nerve during sagittal split setback osteotomy of the mandibular ramus, and tested it on the mandibles of 10 dogs. The osteocompressor bears a superficial resemblance to an osteodistractor, but has a different internal structure that allows it to compress rather than distract. We were able to compress the neurovascular canal, the neurovascular bundle, the cancellous bone, and the mandible in dogs at a rate of 1 mm/day by rotating the screw of the compressor 1.5 times. We conclude that in dogs the neurovascular canal and neurovascular bundle can be compressed with this device without loss of sensation. We believe that this is the first publication on nerve canal compression and osteocompression.     

How is research publishing going to progress in the next 20 years? : Transcription of Session for Editors,Associate Editors,Publishers and others with an interest in scientific publishing held at IADR Meeting in Seattle on Wednesday, 20 March 2013

On March 20th 2013, a one-hour session for Editors, Associate Editors, Publishers and others with an interest in scientific publishing was held at the IADR International Session in Seattle. Organised by Kenneth Eaton and Christopher Lynch (Chair and Secretary, respectively, of the British Dental Editors Forum), the meeting sought to bring together leading international experts in dental publishing, as well as authors, reviewers and students engaged in research. The meeting was an overwhelming success, with more than 100 attendees. A panel involving four leading dental editors led a discussion on anticipated developments in publishing dental research with much involvement and contribution from audience members.