锁骨钢板治疗锁骨中段粉碎性骨折

[目的] 探讨应用解剖型锁骨钢板治疗锁骨中段粉碎性骨折的临床价值。[方法] 应用锁骨钢板治疗锁骨中段粉碎性骨折2l例。[结果] 21例均得到随访，时间6～14个月，所有病例骨折均于术后8～12周临床愈合，无感染、骨不连、内固定松动、再骨折等发生。[结论] 鉴于锁骨中段骨折的特点，应用解剖型的锁骨钢板，有手术时间短、出血少、并发症少、内固定坚强、可早期进行患肩功能锻炼等优点。     

解剖钢板内固定治疗锁骨中段粉碎性骨折的临床效果

目的分析解剖钢板内固定治疗锁骨中段粉碎性骨折的临床效果。方法对48例锁骨中段粉碎性骨折患者实施解剖钢板内固定。观察手术时间、术中出血量、住院时间、骨折愈合时间、术后并发症发生率。依据疗效评判标准评价手术效果。结果本组手术时间56~196 min,平均122.56 min。切口均Ⅰ期愈合。术后随访18~24个月,骨折愈合时间3.62~5.75个月,平均4.85个月。未发生切口感染、皮缘坏死、骨折延迟愈合、不愈合及内固定物松脱折断等并发症。末次随访依据疗效评判标准,优32例、良13例、中3例,优良率为93.75%。结论锁骨解剖锁定板内固定治疗锁骨中段粉碎性骨折,固定牢靠,并发症少,可行早期功能锻炼,肩关节功能恢复效果好。     

锁骨解剖钢板治疗锁骨粉碎性骨折

随着内固定器械的不断更新,以及人们对骨折对位和早期活动的要求不断提高,锁骨骨折切开复位内固定的手术率明显提高,特别是伴有明显移位的粉碎性骨折。自2003年5月～2005年10月采用锁骨解剖钢板治疗锁骨粉碎性骨折59例,效果满意,报告如下。1临床资料1.1一般资料59例中男41例,女     

重建钢板联合加压螺钉治疗锁骨中段粉碎性骨折

目的探讨重建钢板联合加压螺钉治疗锁骨中段粉碎性骨折的疗效。方法根据其手术时间、出血量,骨折愈合时间及肩关节功能来分析重建钢板联合加压螺钉治疗29例锁骨中段粉碎性骨折的临床疗效。结果本组获随访6~12个月,骨折复位良好,愈合时间平均为11周,肩关节功能恢复良好。结论应用重建钢板内固定治疗锁骨中段粉碎性骨折,固定确切,功能恢复好,并发症少,是一种可靠的治疗方法。     

经皮微创锁定型解剖钢板治疗锁骨中段骨折47例

目的探讨经皮锁定型解剖钢板治疗锁骨中段骨折的手术方法和临床疗效。方法自2011年2月至2014年4月,应用锁定型解剖钢板及经皮微创方法治疗锁骨骨折47例,其中男38例,女9例;年龄16~59岁,平均45岁。全部为闭合性骨折。粉碎骨折34例,横形骨折5例,斜形骨折8例。结果 47例患者均获随访,时间9~12个月。骨折均临床愈合,时间8~13周。按孙新宏等疗效评价标准评价,优38例,良8例,差1例。结论经皮锁定型解剖钢板治疗锁骨中段骨折具有创伤小、固定可靠、骨折愈合率高等优点,是一种较理想的治疗方法。     

双钢板内固定治疗锁骨远端粉碎性骨折临床疗效

目的探讨双钢板内固定治疗锁骨远端粉碎性骨折的方法及疗效。方法回顾分析2011年1月-2012年9月采用切开复位锁骨远端双钢板内固定术治疗的16例锁骨远端粉碎性骨折患者临床资料。其中男9例,女7例;年龄36~71岁,平均53.6岁。致伤原因:交通事故伤8例,运动伤5例,高处坠落伤3例;均为闭合骨折。其中CraigⅡ类Ⅱ型骨折10例,CraigⅡ类Ⅴ型骨折5例,CraigⅡ类Ⅱ型合并Ⅲ类骨折1例。受伤至手术时间为12~72 h,平均48 h。术后定期X线片明确骨折愈合情况,末次随访时采用美国肩肘外科医师学会(ASES)评分标准评价术后肩关节功能。结果16例均获随访,随访时间13~17个月,平均13.6个月。X线片示术后骨折均获解剖复位和骨性愈合,愈合时间为4~6个月,平均5.6个月。随访期间无钢板周围骨折、钢板断裂、畸形愈合、骨不连及创伤性关节炎等并发症发生。末次随访时ASES评分为86~93分,平均91分。结论采用双钢板内固定治疗锁骨远端粉碎性骨折,可获坚强固定,避免干扰肩锁关节和肩关节活动,是一种安全可靠的治疗方法。     

锁定加压钢板治疗锁骨远端粉碎性骨折的近期临床疗效分析

[目的]探讨锁定加压钢板治疗锁骨远端粉碎性骨折的近期临床疗效。[方法]回顾性分析2012年1月至2014年7月应用锁定加压钢板治疗的42例锁骨远端粉碎性骨折患者的临床资料,观察记录手术时间、术后骨折愈合时间、术后Constant-Murley肩功能评分及术后并发症等指标。[结果]42例锁骨远端粉碎性骨折患者均获得随访,术后随访时间24~36月,平均28.5个月,平均骨折愈合时间3个月。术后8个月采用Constant-Murly评分对肩关节功能评价,其中优34例,良7例,优良率98%。无骨折延迟愈合、不愈合及螺钉松动、钢板断裂、肩袖损伤、神经血管损伤、肩关节活动受限等并发症,术后肩关节疼痛1例。[结论]锁定加压钢板治疗锁骨远端骨折的临床效果较好,有利于肩关节早期功能恢复,并发症少,是一种理想的固定方式。     

S形解剖锁定钢板治疗锁骨中外1/3粉碎性骨折

正2014年3月~2015年11月,我科采用S形解剖锁定钢板治疗23例锁骨中外1/3粉碎性骨折患者,报道如下。1材料与方法1.1病例资料本组23例,男16例,女7例,年龄21~53岁。均为锁骨中外1/3粉碎性骨折,断端移位明显。伤后至手术时间1~4 d。1.2治疗方法颈丛麻醉。以骨折处为中心做3~4 cm切口。不剥离骨膜,将骨折远近端主要部分复位采用克氏针临时固定,保留碎骨块上相连的软组织,     

双钢板内固定治疗锁骨中段粉碎性骨折疗效观察

目的观察双钢板内固定治疗锁骨中段粉碎性骨折的临床疗效。方法回顾性分析自2016-01—2017-10采用标准锁骨解剖锁定钢板联合微型掌指骨钢板内固定治疗的23例锁骨中段粉碎性骨折。末次随访时疗效采用肩关节功能Constant-Murley评分评定。结果 23例均获得随访,随访时间平均13.2(12～15)个月。随访期间骨折均愈合,无感染、骨折再移位、骨折不愈合、内固定松动断裂等并发症发生。骨折骨性愈合时间3～6个月,平均4.6个月。末次随访时肩关节功能Constant-Murley评分为87～92分,平均88.9分。末次随访时所有患者肩部无疼痛,肩关节活动度与健侧无明显差别。结论采用标准锁骨解剖锁定钢板联合微型掌指骨钢板内固定治疗锁骨中段粉碎性骨折可以提供稳定的生物力学固定,有利于术后患者早期康复功能锻炼,疗效满意。     

尼斯结联合解剖锁定钢板治疗成人锁骨中段粉碎骨折疗效分析

目的探讨尼斯结联合解剖锁定钢板治疗成人粉碎锁骨中段骨折的临床疗效。 方法回顾性分析我科于2014年1月至2017年2月采用尼斯结联合解剖锁定钢板治疗28例成人锁骨中段粉碎骨折临床资料,末次随访采用Constant-Murley评分及Lazzcano评定标准进行肩关节功能评价。 结果28例患者术后获6~16个月随访,平均（10.27±3.22）个月,手术时间55~90 min,平均（63.33±21.27）min,术中出血量40~100 ml,平均（62.67±19.07）ml。手术切口均一期愈合,无伤口感染、内固定相关的松动或断裂并发症发生,2例消瘦患者出现钢板刺激皮肤不适而行内固定取出。末次随访时肩关节Constant-Murley评分为80~100分,平均（90.00±5.98）分,Lazzcano评定标准进行疗效评价,其中优20例,良6例,中2例,优良率为92.86%。 结论尼斯结联合解剖锁定钢板治疗粉碎锁骨中段骨折可达到良好解剖复位、内固定稳定、愈合率高、并发症少,是治疗锁骨中段粉碎骨折的一种新选择。     

Treatment of mid-shaft clavicle fractures: A comparative study

We retrospectively evaluated 51 patients (17 in each of three groups) with mid shaft clavicle fractures. Group 1 underwent intramedullary stabilization using clavicle pins. Group 2 underwent open reduction and internal fixation using plates and group 3 underwent non operative treatment with a sling. Group1 patients progressed to union within 8 to 12 weeks. In Group 2, six patients had scar related pain and two had prominent metal work and discomfort and in group 3, three patients developed non union and one had symptomatic malunion. Our results suggest that the displaced and shortened midshaft clavicle fractures require operative fixation and the techniques of clavicle pinning resulted in less complications, short hospital stay and good functional outcome.     

Fracture of distal end clavicle: A review

Management of fracture distal end clavicle has always puzzled the orthopaedic surgeons. Now-a-days with a relatively active lifestyle, patients want better results both cosmetically and functionally. Despite so much literature available for the management of this common fracture, there is no consensus regarding the gold standard treatment for this fracture. In this article, we reviewed the literature on various techniques of management for this fracture, both conservative as well as surgical, and their merits and demerits.     

Intraosseous Neurofibroma of the Clavicle

A case of an intraosseous neurofibroma of the medial end of the clavicle, treated surgically, is reported. The relevant literature is reviewed.     

Slipped capital femoral epiphysis: Early mechanical damage to the acetabular cartilage by a prominent femoral metaphysis

On the basis of intraoperative observations in 13 consecutive adolescents (14 hips) with slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE), we found that when the anterior femoral metaphysis was level with or extended past the epiphysis, it caused labrum and cartilage damage. As a result of an impingement between the metaphysis and the superomedial acetabular rim, the labrum revealed erosions, scars or tears. Further jamming of the metaphysis into the joint damaged the adjacent acetabular cartilage, varying from a partial- to a full-thickness cartilage loss. In all patients, the femoral head cartilage was intact; no avascular necrosis was present. Our findings suggest that arthrosis in SCFE can be triggered by early mechanical damage of the acetabular cartilage.     

Superior clavicle plate with lateral extension for displaced lateral clavicle fractures: a prospective study

Background

Until now there have been no prospective studies describing the results of using the superior clavicle plate with lateral extension in patients with displaced lateral clavicle fractures (Neer type 2). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the results of applying this plate for this specific type of fracture.

Materials and methods

In this prospective study, seven patients (mean age 43, M:F; 6:1) with a fresh displaced lateral clavicle fracture were evaluated with a mean follow-up of 10 months. Analysis included functional and subjective outcome, time until union, time until return to work, and complications.

Results

All patients achieved clinical and radiological union within 6–12 weeks. Full range of motion as well as a return to work was achieved in most cases within 2 weeks. The mean Constant score was 98 (range 90–100), the DASH score was 3.6 (range 0–11.4), and the Shoulder Rating Questionnaire score was 97 (range 96–100). No major complications were encountered. Three patients required plate removal: two because of a prominent and subcutaneous plate and one because of an intra-articular screw.

Conclusions

In this study, use of the superior clavicle plate with lateral extension yielded excellent results in the treatment of this difficult fracture. In particular, patients acquired full range of motion within 2 weeks, reflecting the stability of the osteosynthesis achieved with this implant.     

AO锁骨钩钢板治疗肩锁关节脱位及锁骨远端骨折

肩锁关节脱位和锁骨远端骨折是临床中较常见的损伤。对NeerⅡ型和TossyⅢ型多采取手术治疗,手术方法较多,但效果仍不满意。2000年1月～2005年12月,我们应用AO锁骨钩钢板治疗肩锁关节脱位和锁骨远端骨折32例,疗效满意。1材料与方法1.1病例资料本组32例,男25例,女7例,年龄18～70岁。左侧20例,右侧12例,均为单侧闭合性新鲜损伤。锁骨远端骨折21例,均为NeerⅡ型;肩锁关节脱位11例,均为TossyⅢ型。其中1例为Ⅲ型肩锁关节脱位伴锁骨远端骨折。伤后1～12d手术,所有骨折脱位均摄X线片证实。1.2治疗方法臂丛麻醉或全麻。复位肩锁关节,将钢板的尖端…     

锁骨钩钢板治疗锁骨远端骨折

2004年6月～2006年12月，笔者采用锁骨钩钢板治疗15例急性锁骨远端骨折，疗效满意。     

Combination of a floating clavicle and a posterior shoulder dislocation: An “Unhappy Triad” of the shoulder girdle

We present a case of a 31-year-old man who suffered from a floating clavicle in combination with a reverse Hill-Sachs lesion of his right shoulder girdle after a bicycle accident. Operative treatment was performed using minimal-invasive and arthroscopically assisted techniques.We strongly recommend an early CT scan with later 3-dimensional reconstruction to detect and fully understand these complex injuries.     

也谈锁骨骨折的治疗

贵刊 2 0 0 1年第 1 4卷第 1 0期刊登二篇锁骨骨折治疗的文章 ,笔者也想借贵刊一角谈一下个人治疗锁骨骨折的体会 ,算是争鸣吧。1　关于保守治疗锁骨骨折采用保守治疗为主的观点已得到学术界的广泛认同[1 ] ,但就其复位与固定的方法仍有深入探讨之必要。1 1　复位的问题　在“单棉条”法治疗锁骨骨折一文中 ,作者通过临床实践得出锁骨骨折成角及重叠移位者无需复位 ,单纯外固定既可取得满意疗效的结论 ,笔者认为此种提法欠妥。虽然锁骨骨折有成角畸型者理论上讲无需复位亦能恢复 ,不影响肩关节功能 ,但在 1 992至 1 997年 6年临床实践中 ,…