发散式体外冲击波治疗颈肩肌筋膜疼痛综合征

目的评价发散式体外冲击波治疗颈肩肌筋膜疼痛综合征的安全性和有效性。方法自2012年5月至2012年8月通过发散式体外冲击波治疗仪(AGD-800)治疗颈肩肌筋膜疼痛综合征36例患者,每位患者都以痛点定位冲击点,每次治疗一个或多个冲击点(疼痛区域),每个冲击点次数2 000次,治疗周期7 d/次,连续治疗3次,分别为0、7、14 d,治疗时间为5~10 min,并随访记录治疗前、治疗后、7 d、14 d、21 d的疼痛视觉模拟评分(visual analogue scale,VAS)、医生评价评分、患者反应评分及总体评分。结果 36例患者中32例获得完全随访,均无不良事件发生。VAS评分随着时间延长、治疗次数增加逐渐改善,治疗前后比较差异有统计学意义。患者对治疗效果较满意,总有效率末次随访达到50%。结论冲击波技术无明显损伤、安全、简便、有一定的疗效,可作为颈肩肌筋膜疼痛综合征综合治疗中的一种辅助治疗,值得推广。     

冲击波联合局部注射治疗腰背肌筋膜疼痛综合征

目的 观察冲击波联合局部注射治疗腰背肌筋膜疼痛综合征的疗效.方法 将66例腰背肌筋膜疼痛综合征患者分为三组:冲击波治疗组(A组),局部注射治疗组(B组),冲击波联合局部注射组(C组).记录三组治疗前后的VAS评分.结果 A、B组间的疗效差异没有统计学意义,A、C组间疗效差异具有统计学意义(P=0.015);B、C组间疗效比较差异具有统计学意义(P=0.003).结论 冲击波联合局部注射治疗腰背肌筋膜疼痛综合征较单纯应用冲击波和单纯注射治疗的疗效更好.     

超声引导下体外冲击波治疗颈肩肌筋膜疼痛综合征的疗效观察

目的探讨超声引导下体外冲击波治疗颈肩肌筋膜疼痛综合征的临床疗效和安全性。 方法前瞻性收集2017年1月至2018年6月在江苏省苏北人民医院和苏州大学附属第一医院门诊收治的颈肩肌筋膜疼痛综合征患者共计60例,按随机数字表法分为治疗组和对照组,每组各30例,对照组予以红外线、经皮神经电刺激、推拿等常规康复训练,治疗组在对照组基础上行超声引导下冲击波治疗,每周2次,连续治疗3 w。于治疗前、首次治疗后、3 w后分别对两组患者采用McGill疼痛问卷（McGill pain questionnaire,MPQ）,颈椎功能障碍指数（neck disability index,NDI）进行功能评估;治疗前、治疗3 w后采用剪切波超声弹性成像技术评估颈肩部筋膜硬度（Emean值）及厚度（mm）。 结果两组患者治疗前、首次治疗后、治疗3 w后PRI-T评分分别为：（8.1±3.2）/（7.9±3.3）、（4.3±2.6）/（5.2±2.5）、（1.1±1.3）/（3.3±1.4）分,治疗前后比较,两组差异均有统计学意义（F=2.368,F=1.985,P<0.05）;组间比较,差异有统计学意义（t=1.985,P<0.05）。VAS评分分别为：（6.2±2.3）/（6.4±2.4）、（4.4±2.1）/（4.9±2.3）、（2.6±1.3）/（3.2±1.7）分,治疗前后比较,两组差异均有统计学意义（F=2.315,F=1.876,P<0.05）;组间比较,差异有统计学意义（t=1.752,P<0.05）。PPI评分分别为：（2.6±0.8）/（2.5±0.7）、（1.3±0.6）/（1.6±0.4）、（0.4±0.3）/（0.9±0.6）分,治疗前后比较,两组差异均有统计学意义（F=2.056,F=1.988,P<0.05）;组间比较,差异有统计学意义（t=1.680,P<0.05）。NDI分别为：（43.2±2.9）/（42.9±2.8）、（26.7±3.4）/（31.1±3.3）、（11.4±3.2）/（23.3±3.4）分,两组治疗前后比较,差异均有统计学意义（F=3.689,F=3.002,P<0.05）;组间比较,差异有统计学意义（t=1.680,P<0.05）。治疗3 w后,两组患者斜方肌筋膜硬度及厚度分别由治疗前的（18.4±4.3）/（17.9±4.4）kPa和（7.9±0.8）/（7.8±0.8）mm改善至（6.5±2.8）/（9.7±3.2）kPa和（4.6±0.5）/（5.4±0.7）mm,差异有统计学意义（t=6.325,t=5.256,t=2.589,t=2.014,P<0.05）;且治疗组改善优于对照组,差异有统计学意义（t=2.652,t=1.801,P<0.05）。两组患者肩胛提肌筋膜硬度及厚度分别由治疗前的（14.7±3.4）/（14.9±3.1）kPa和（6.7±0.6）/（6.8±0.5）mm改善至（5.9±2.4）/（8.1±3.7）kPa和（4.8±0.6）/（5.1±0.6）mm,差异有统计学意义（t=4.585,t=3.652,t=1.982,t=1.710,P<0.05）;且治疗组改善优于对照组,差异有统计学意义（t=2.655,t=1.699,P<0.05）。两组患者菱形肌筋膜硬度及厚度分别由治疗前的（10.3±4.2）/（11.1±3.8）kPa和（6.0±0.7）/（6.4±0.6）mm改善至（4.2±1.3）/（6.4±2.8）kPa和（4.7±0.3）/（5.6±0.6）mm,差异有统计学意义（t=4.602,t=4.055,t=2.621,t=1.986,P<0.05）;且治疗组改善优于对照组,差异有统计学意义（t=2.540,t=1.729,P<0.05）。 结论通过超声引导体外冲击波可有效缓解颈肩肌筋膜疼痛综合征疼痛症状,改善颈肩部活动功能,同时应用剪切波超声弹性成像技术可以提供精准诊疗,值得临床应用推广。     

五行音乐联合针刺激痛点治疗肩背部肌筋膜疼痛综合征45例临床观察

目的: 观察五行音乐联合针刺激痛点对肩背部肌筋膜疼痛综合征的临床疗效。 方法: 将90例肩背部肌筋膜疼痛综合征患者按照随机数字表法分为治疗组和对照组,每组45例。对照组给予针刺激痛点治疗,治疗组在对照组治疗基础上加用五行音乐。2组均以10 d为1个疗程,治疗2个疗程。观察2组临床疗效,以及治疗前后McGill简化量表疼痛评分,包括疼痛分级指数(PRI)评分、现有痛强度(PPI)评分、视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分,并观察2组复发情况。 结果: 治疗组痊愈32例,显效10例,有效3例,无效0例,痊愈率为71.11%;对照组痊愈24例,显效13例,有效8例,无效0例,痊愈率为53.33%。2组比较,差异有统计学意义(P <0.05)。治疗后,2组PRI评分、PPI评分、VAS评分较治疗前均有改善(P <0.05),且治疗组优于对照组(P <0.05)。6个月后,治疗组复发4例,复发率8.89%;对照组复发10例,复发率为22.22%。2组比较,差异有统计学意义(P <0.05)。 结论: 五行音乐联合针刺激痛点治疗肩背部肌筋膜疼痛综合征,疗效较佳,值得临床推广。     

铍针配合手法治疗颈肌筋膜疼痛综合征

2004年6月至2005年6月,应用铍针松解隔日配合手法治疗颈肌筋膜疼痛综合征50例,疗效满意,现报道如下。1临床资料本组50例中男23例,女27例;年龄31～59岁,平均44岁。均为急性起病,病程最短0.5d,最长3个月,平均18d。诊断依据:常有慢性劳损或着凉病史,项背及肩部疼痛常可因此而加重。颈项部及肩背部可触及激痛点,一般为枕颈交界的斜方肌、胸锁乳突肌、头夹肌等附着处或颈椎横突旁肌附着处,肩胛骨内缘的肩胛提肌、菱形肌、岗上肌、岗下肌等处,痛性皮下结节或条索样肿块,压痛明显,甚则可激惹远处部位的传导性疼痛。颈肌痉挛,颈部活动往往受限。皮肤…     

超声RTE技术辅助下针刺激痛点治疗肌筋膜疼痛综合征的临床意义

目的 探讨超声实时组织弹性成像(real-time tissue elastograph, RTE)技术辅助下针刺激痛点治疗肌筋膜疼痛综合征(myofascial pain syndrome, MPS)的临床价值。方法 于2019年3月～2020年8月随机纳入65例斜方肌MPS患者,采用计算机生成随机数字表法分为两组：研究组33例,采用超声RTE技术联合针刺激痛点治疗(以超声RTE图像中的红色区域为激痛点);对照组32例,采用传统针刺激痛点治疗(采用传统触诊方式确定激痛点)。每5 d为一疗程,中间休息2 d,共治疗3个疗程。治疗结束后,观察患者的疼痛VAS评分、现时疼痛强度(Present pain intensity, PPI)和疼痛评定指数(Pain rating index, PRI),并进行总体疗效评价;随访1年,观察其远期复发率。结果 与治疗前比较,两组患者治疗后的VAS、PPI和PRI评分和超声RTE弹性评分均有显著降低(P<0.05),且研究组治疗后的3项疼痛评分及超声RTE弹性评分均显著低于对照组(P<0.05);研究组优良率为85.7%,显著高于对照组的7...     

悬吊运动疗法联合体外冲击波对腰肌筋膜疼痛综合征康复的影响

<正>表1 两组一般资料比较肌筋膜疼痛综合征(myofascial pain syndrome, MPS)是临床常见的软组织疼痛症候群,发病率较高[2],不及时治疗可使病情迁延不愈,导致疼痛加重,腰椎功能障碍,甚至引发焦虑、抑郁等精神疾病,降低生活质量[1]。本研究探讨悬吊运动疗法联合体外冲击波在腰MPS患者康复中的作用,报道如下。1 资料与方法1.1 一般资料选取2016年3月～2020年3月本院治疗的腰MPS患者98例,     

冲击波治疗腰背肌筋膜疼痛综合征近期疗效观察及康复指导

[目的]观察冲击波治疗腰背肌筋膜疼痛综合征的临床疗效及康复指导的作用.[方法]选择65例门诊腰背肌筋膜疼痛患者,使用瑞士DolorCLast放散状冲击波治疗机进行标准治疗及康复指导.采用日本骨科学会(JOA)腰背痛评分标准评价疗效.采用SPSS19.0进行统计处理.[结果]治疗后疼痛明显减轻,功能也有明显的改善,65例患者在治疗后,治愈率为61.5％,显效率为16.9％,有效率18.5％,无效率3.1％.根据JOA评分,治疗前后评分的差异具有统计学意义.[结论]冲击波治疗及康复指导对腰背肌筋膜疼痛综合征患者效果确切、安全、有效.     

盆底肌激痛点注射治疗直肠癌经腹会阴切除术后慢性疼痛综合征

探讨盆底肌筋膜激痛点注射疗法治疗直肠癌经腹会阴切除术后慢性盆腔疼痛(PSCP)的疗效。50例直肠癌术后继发PSCP患者随机分为2组(每组25例):传统药物治疗组(C组)采用阿司匹林、消炎痛、扶他林等口服药物治疗。激痛点注射治疗组(T组)指诊检查盆底相关肌筋膜可触及明显的激痛点,盆底肌相关激痛点采用注射疗法进行治疗。注射药物:利美达松4 mg、2%盐酸利多卡因5 mL、维生素B121 mg,用注射用生理盐水稀释至20 mL,每点注射约5 mL。经14次治疗后,评定患者治疗前,治疗后即刻及第7、14、21、28天疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS);治疗28 d后行临床疗效分析;记录治疗期间的不良反应。治疗后T组VAS评分低于C组(P0.05);治疗28 d后,T组有效率92%,高于C组(32%,P0.01)。盆底肌筋膜激痛点注射疗法可安全有效地缓解直肠癌手术后引起的PSCP。盆底肌激痛点可能是导致PSCP的重要病理生理机制     

Ultrasonographic evaluation at 6-month follow-up of plantar fasciitis after extracorporeal shock wave therapy

Introduction The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) on the ultrasonographic appearance of chronically painful, proximal plantar fasciitis.Materials and methods Twenty-two patients with a unilateral proximal plantar fasciitis were prospectively enrolled after unsuccessful conservative treatment lasting 6 months. The contralateral plantar fascia was used as the control. ESWT (3×3000 shock waves/session of 0.2 mJ/mm²) was performed at weekly intervals. The thickness of the plantar fascia was measured ultrasonographically about 2 cm distal of the medial calcaneal tuberosity. Pain estimation on a visual analogue scale (VAS) and the comfortable walking time were recorded. No local anaesthesia was applied. Follow-up was done at 6, 12 and 24 weeks.Results Before ESWT, the plantar fasciitis side was ultrasonographically significantly thicker than the control side (p<0.05), whereas 6 months after ESWT, the thickness of the fascia was no longer significantly different. The decrease in thickness of the plantar fasciitis side was significant (p<0.05). Pain during activities of daily living decreased by 79% according to the VAS, and the comfortable walking time increased, both significantly (p<0.01). In patients with little pain (VAS<30), the thickness of the plantar fasciitis side was significantly less (p<0.01) compared with patients who still suffered more pain (VAS>30).Conclusion After ESWT, the thickness of the plantar fascia in patients with plantar fasciitis decreased, pain and walking time improved (all significantly).     

A volleyball player with bilateral knee osteochondritis dissecans treated with extracorporeal shock wave therapy

We present a case report of a 14-year-old Caucasian sport woman affected by bilateral and symmetrical knee osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) addressed to surgery, in which extracorporeal shock wave therapy determined complete healing. Shock wave is a longitudinal acoustic wave traveling with the speed of ultrasound through the water of the body tissue. Recently, this therapy has been used in the treatment of a number of musculoskeletal pathologies on the basis of the effects produced by the induction of angiogenesis, recruitment of progenitor cells and downregulation of cartilage damage. This therapy is useful, because it is non-invasive, safe, without complications or adverse effects and repeatable. Thus, it could be suggested as a useful strategy for the treatment of OCD prior starting surgery.     

Histopathologic effects of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy on rabbit kidney

Summary Despite the widespread clinical use of the lithotriptor, the margin of safety for the kidney during shock wave application is substantially unknown. Although a series of pilot studies have been performed in laboratory animals, long-term follow-up is mandatory to establish the effect of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) and subsequent dose-dependent changes on the kidneys. An experimental study was performed in 45 rabbits; to define and compare the early and late complications of ESWL in the kidneys. The rabbits were divided into three groups of 15 animals each that received 1000, 1500 or 3000 shock waves respectively at 15–20 kV. The rabbits in each group were killed and necropsy performed within 24 h for the first 5 animals, 1 week for the second 5 animals and 2 months post-ESWL for the last 5 animals. Dose-dependent moderate damage (subcapsular hemorrhage, interstitial hemorrhage, capsular tension and perirenal hemorrhage) were noted in all kidneys at 24 h after treatment. Evidence of permanent changes (some fibrosis, tubular and glomerular damage, chronic inflammatory alterations) was noted in long-term follow up. Complete necrosis of the treated kidney was not encountered in this study.     

发散式冲击波治疗间盘源性下腰痛近期疗效观察

目的：评价发散式冲击波（RSWT）治疗间盘源性下腰痛的近期疗效。方法：对43例间盘源性下腰痛患者进行发散式冲击波治疗,配合适当的卧床休息和躯干核心稳定肌功能锻炼,比较治疗1w、2w及治疗结束后1月、3月随访时的患者的VAS疼痛评分及Oswestry功能指数的变化。结果：治疗后1w、2w、1月、3月不同时段所观察记录VAS疼痛分值及Oswestry功能指数均较治疗前明显下降,差异有显著性（P〈0．05）。结论：发散式冲击波可有效缓解下腰背部疼痛并能改善腰部功能,其近期疗效满意,值得推广并行进一步前瞻对照研究。     

Prevention of arthrofibrosis during knee repair by extracorporeal shock wave therapy: Preliminary study in rabbits

Introduction

Surgery or trauma may induce extensive arthrofibrosis around joints and tendon for the restrictive range of motion. Although some approaches were proposed, this problem is not solved satisfactorily. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) has been used for orthopedic, musculoskeletal, and fibrotic disorders. Whether it could prevent the formation of arthrofibrosis during the joint repair is unknown.

中度腕管综合征的体外冲击波治疗效果研究

目的评估体外冲击波(extracorporeal shock wave therapy,ESWT)这一新型的无创性方法对中度腕管综合征(carpal tunnel syndrone,CTS)的治疗效果。方法选取2014年6月-2016年6月收治的CTS患者80例,随机分为A、B两组(n=40)。A组给予ESWT治疗,每周一次,疗程共4周;B组给予口服塞来昔布(200 mg)和维生素B1片(300 mg),2次/d,疗程共4周。两组夜间均采用腕部支具固定。在治疗前和治疗后1、3、6个月采用视觉模拟评分(VAS)、波士顿问卷量表评分(BCTQ)以及中华医学会手外科学会上肢功能评定标准评价患者的临床疗效。结果两组在治疗后1、3、6个月的VAS评分均较治疗前显著改善(P<0.05),但A组的改善程度较同期B组更为显著(P<0.05);A组的Boston SYMPT评分和FUNCT评分均较治疗前显著改善,而B组的Boston SYMPT评分和FUNCT评分仅在治疗后3个月有明显差别,并且均低于同期A组;A组在治疗6个月后的各项评分几乎保持不变,基本趋于稳定,而B组的各项评分却明显增加;随访终末期评价,虽然两组有效率相比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但A组的优良率明显高于B组(P<0.05),复发率也明显低于B组(P<0.05)。结论在临床上可以推荐ESWT作为中度CTS患者的一种保守治疗手段。     

影响体外冲击波碎石术疗效的因素分析

目的　探讨影响体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)疗效的因素。　方法　回顾ESWL治疗尿路结石患者234例的临床资料。分析患者性别、年龄、病程、结石大小、位置、X线形态及合并肾积水情况等因素与治疗成功率的关系。ESWL术后3个月接受KUB、IVU和B超检查,剩余结石<2mm为碎石成功, >2mm为治疗不成功。　结果　234例碎石成功率78. 6% (184 /234)。男性组和女性组治疗成功率分别为80. 3% (122 /152)和75. 6% (62 /82),P>0. 05。治疗不成功组与成功组病程分别为(1262. 6±1742. 1)d、(722. 9±1364. 6)d,P>0. 05;结石直径分别为(1. 1±0. 6)cm、(1. 0±0. 4)cm,P>0. 05;年龄分别为(58. 8±13. 6)岁、(42. 8±12. 2)岁,P<0. 05。肾盂结石(22. 7%, 10 /44)与肾盏结石(40. 0%, 8 /20),肾盂结石与输尿管结石( 18. 8%, 32 /170 ),输尿管上段结石( 15. 8%, 18 /114)与下段结石(25. 0%, 14 /56)间不成功率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0. 05)。均匀高密度结石(20. 0%, 6 /30)与杂色结石(21. 6%, 44 /204)不成功率两组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0. 05)。结石直径0. 3~1. 0cm者(1. 9%, 2 /108), 1. 0 ~2. 0cm者(29. 8%, 28 /94), >2. 0cm者(62. 5%, 20 /32)不成功率3组两两比较P<0. 05。结石大小与治疗剂量呈正相关(r=0.28,P=0. 006)。     

Effect of extracorporeal shock wave therapy for burn scar regeneration: A prospective,randomized, double-blinded study

PurposeThis study aimed to investigate the regeneration effect of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) on hypertrophic scar regeneration using objective measurements.MethodsThis was a double-blinded, randomized, controlled trial of 48 participants who had undergone autologous split-thickness skin grafting (STSG) with same artificial dermis. The ESWT group (n = 25) received shock waves with low-energy flux density (0.05–0.30 mJ/mm²). The interval between treatments is a 1-week. The ESWT group also received recommended treatment. The control group (n = 23) only received standard treatment. We measured skin characteristics before treatment and after 6 weeks for both groups.ResultsNo significant intergroup difference was noted at the initial evaluations (p > 0.05). The pre- to post-treatment change in the scar thickness (p = 0.03) and erythema (p = 0.03), greater reduction was found in the ESWT group than control group. The pre- to post-treatment change in the sebum level (p = 0.02), more increase was found in the ESWT group. We found no significant differences in the change measurements between the two groups for melanin levels (p = 0.62) and transepidermal water loss (TEWL) (p = 0.94). The changes (skin distensibility, biological skin elasticity, gross skin elasticity, and skin viscoelasticity) measured with the Cutometer showed no significant differences between the two groups (p = 0.87, p = 0.32, p = 0.37, and p = 0.29, respectively).ConclusionThis is the first report of ESWT on hypertrophic scar after burn using objective tools (melanin, erythema, sebum, TEWL, elasticity and thickness). ESWT has objective beneficial effects on burn-associated scar characteristics.