Supracondylar Humerus Fractures: Classification Based Treatment Algorithms

Supracondylar humerus fractures are the most common fractures around the elbow in children between 4 and 10 years of age. The treatment of supracondylar humerus fractures can vary from conservative treatment to operative treatment depending on the fracture type. All around the world, the most commonly used classification system is the Wilkins-modified Gartland classification of supracondylar humerus fractures. Currently, the decision to operate or conserve the fracture is taken on basis of this classification system. Non-operative treatment for type I fractures and operative treatment for type III fractures have been well-established in literature. The management of type II supracondylar humerus fracture creates confusion in the minds of numerous orthopaedic surgeons around the world. We have tried addressing this using a classification-based treatment algorithm. Other classification systems like the AO classification, Lagrange and Rigault classification and Bahk classification with special reference to special fracture patterns that require attention and pre-op planning have also been mentioned. It is important to understand that operative management of each supracondylar humerus fracture is unique as regards fixation method and it is important to consider the fracture pattern before internal fixation.     

Reliability of the AO/ASIF classification for pertrochanteric femoral fractures

20 radiographs of pertrochanteric femoral fractures were classified as to fracture "group" and "sub-group" according to the AO/ASIF Fracture Classification (type 31A) by 15 observers. 3 months later, the same radiographs were reviewed by the same observers. Mean agreement of the observers with the final consensus ranged from 53% (with subgroup classification) to 81% (without subgroup). The mean kappa value for interobserver reliability was 0.33 and 0.34 for classification with subgroup in both observer sessions, respectively. Omission of the subgroup classification resulted in better mean kappa values (0.67 and 0.63, respectively). Mean intraobserver reliability was 0.48 in the fracture "subgroup" and 0.78 in the "group" classification. In conclusion, the results show that the AO/ASIF classification for pertrochanteric fractures is reliable for fracture subgroups 31A1, A2 or A3. The group classification should be used to compare scientific data and determine the best treatment. Further classification of fracture subgroups leads to poor reproducibility of results.     

Reliability of the AO/ASIF classification for pertrochanteric femoral fractures

20 radiographs of pertrochanteric femoral fractures were classified as to fracture "group" and "subgroup" according to the AO/ASIF Fracture Classification (type 31A) by 15 observers. 3 months later, the same radiographs were reviewed by the same observers. Mean agreement of the observers with the final consensus ranged from 53% (with subgroup classification) to 81% (without subgroup). The mean kappa value for interobserver reliability was 0.33 and 0.34 for classification with subgroup in both observer sessions, respectively. Omission of the subgroup classification resulted in better mean kappa values (0.67 and 0.63, respectively). Mean intraobserver reliability was 0.48 in the fracture "subgroup" and 0.78 in the "group" classification. In conclusion, the results show that the AO/ASIF classification for pertrochanteric fractures is reliable for fracture subgroups 31A1, A2 or A3. The group classification should be used to compare scientific data and determine the best treatment. Further classification of fracture subgroups leads to poor reproducibility of results.     

Patterns of pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures

PURPOSE: The Wilkins-modified Gartland classification of pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures does not consider coronal or sagittal obliquity. The purposes of our study were (1) to identify and describe fracture characteristics with unique properties and (2) to propose a fracture classification system that can be reproduced reliably. METHODS: We retrospectively studied 203 consecutive displaced pediatric extension-type supracondylar humerus fractures treated operatively from January 1998 to January 2003. Fracture characteristics (eg, coronal and sagittal obliquity, postoperative alignment), type of surgical treatment, outcome, and complications were assessed and analyzed statistically with Student t test and a receiver operating characteristic curve. Significance was defined as P < 0.05. We incorporated significant cutoff values for fracture obliquity into our classification scheme and tested the classification's interobserver and intraobserver reliability. RESULTS: We identified 4 coronal (typical transverse, medial oblique, lateral oblique, and high fractures) and 2 sagittal (low sagittal and high sagittal) subtypes with significantly different characteristics and outcome. Compared with fractures with coronal obliquity of less than 10 degrees, fractures with coronal obliquity of 10 degrees or greater were associated with significantly more comminution and rotational malunion. Compared with fractures with sagittal obliquity of less than 20 degrees, fractures with sagittal obliquity of 20 degrees or greater were associated with a significantly higher incidence of additional injuries and were more likely to result in extension malunion. Analysis of the interobserver and intraobserver reliability for our system identified correlation coefficients ranging from 0.772 to 0.907 and 0.860 to 0.899, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Because pediatric extension-type supracondylar humerus fractures vary significantly in terms of characteristics, identification of sagittal oblique and coronal oblique angles may have an important role in surgical decision making and may impact outcomes.     

Seinsheimer's classification of subtrochanteric fractures: Poor reproducibility of 4 observers' evaluation of 50 cases

We examined the reliability of the Seinsheimer classification of subtrochanteric fractures of the femur. 50 consecutive anteroposterior and lateral radiographs were assessed independently by 4 observers twice with a 6-week interval. The interobserver variation was large; only 13 of the 50 fractures were classified identically by all 4 observers. The intraobserver variation showed identical classification in 26-37 of 50 radiographs. When assessing only whether the fracture was subtype 3A or not, the 4 observers agreed in 31 of 50 radiographs. We conclude that the Seinsheimer classification has no value in clinical practice.     

Interobserver and intraobserver variation in classification systems for fractures of the distal humerus

We assessed the inter- and intraobserver variation in classification systems for fractures of the distal humerus. Three orthopaedic trauma consultants, three trauma registrars and three consultant musculoskeletal radiologists independently classified 33 sets of radiographs of such fractures on two occasions, each using three separate systems. For interobserver variation, the Riseborough and Radin system produced 'moderate' agreement (kappa = 0.513), but half of the fractures were not classifiable by this system. For the complete AO system, agreement was 'fair' (kappa = 0.343), but if only AO type and group or AO type alone was used, agreement improved to 'moderate' and 'substantial', respectively (kappa = 0.52 and 0.66). Agreement for the system of Jupiter and Mehne was 'fair' (kappa = 0.295). Similar levels of intraobserver variation were found. Systems of classification are useful in decision-making and evaluation of outcome only if there is agreement and consistency among observers. Our study casts doubt on these aspects of the systems currently available for fractures of the distal humerus.     

Two and three-dimensional computed tomography for the classification and management of distal humeral fractures. Evaluation of reliability and diagnostic accuracy

BACKGROUND: Complex fractures of the distal part of the humerus can be difficult to characterize on plain radiographs and two-dimensional computed tomography scans. We tested the hypothesis that three-dimensional reconstructions of computed tomography scans improve the reliability and accuracy of fracture characterization, classification, and treatment decisions. METHODS: Five independent observers evaluated thirty consecutive intra-articular fractures of the distal part of the humerus for the presence of five fracture characteristics: a fracture line in the coronal plane; articular comminution; metaphyseal comminution; the presence of separate, entirely articular fragments; and impaction of the articular surface. Fractures were also classified according to the AO/ASIF Comprehensive Classification of Fractures and the classification system of Mehne and Matta. Two rounds of evaluation were performed and then compared. Initially, a combination of plain radiographs and two-dimensional computed tomography scans (2D) were evaluated, and then, two weeks later, a combination of radiographs, two-dimensional computed tomography scans, and three-dimensional reconstructions of computed tomography scans (3D) were assessed. RESULTS: Three-dimensional computed tomography improved both the intraobserver and the interobserver reliability of the AO classification system and the Mehne and Matta classification system. Three-dimensional computed tomography reconstructions also improved the intraobserver agreement for all fracture characteristics, from moderate (average kappa [kappa2D] = 0.554) to substantial agreement (kappa3D = 0.793). The addition of three-dimensional images had limited influence on the interobserver reliability and diagnostic characteristics (sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy) for the recognition of specific fracture characteristics. Three-dimensional computed tomography images improved intraobserver agreement (kappa2D = 0.62 compared with kappa3D = 0.75) but not interobserver agreement (kappa2D = 0.24 compared with kappa3D = 0.28) for treatment decisions. CONCLUSIONS: Three-dimensional reconstructions improve the reliability, but not the accuracy, of fracture classification and characterization. The influence of three-dimensional computed tomography was much more notable for intraobserver comparisons than for interobserver comparisons, suggesting that different observers see different things in the scans-most likely a reflection of the training, knowledge, and experience of the observer with regard to these relatively uncommon and complex injuries.     

儿童严重不稳定型肱骨髁上骨折的治疗体会:附Gartland Ⅳ型8例报道

目的 探讨严重移位的、屈曲及伸直位均不稳定的小儿肱骨髁上骨折Gartland Ⅳ型治疗。方法 对2008 年3月～2010年8月我院收治的8 例儿童严重的Gartland Ⅳ型肱骨髁上骨折的手术治疗疗效进行评价,分析此类型小儿肱骨髁上骨折手法复位失败的原因和切开复位克氏针固定的治疗效果。结果 8例Gartland III型肱骨髁上骨折患儿均接受切开复位及克氏针内固定术,早期进行肘关节功能锻炼,总体效果良好。随访1～3年,无一例发生骨不连,肘内翻,神经损伤。结论 Gartland III型肱骨髁上骨折切开复位仍是主要治疗手段。同时,早期进行肘关节功能锻炼,是提高本种类型骨折治疗疗效、防止肘内翻畸形发生的关键。     

Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of two classification systems for intra-articular calcaneal fractures

BACKGROUND: For a fracture classification to be useful it must provide prognostic significance, interobserver reliability, and intraobserver reproducibility. Most studies have found reliability and reproducibility to be poor for fracture classification schemes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the Sanders and Crosby-Fitzgibbons classification systems, two commonly used methods for classifying intra-articular calcaneal fractures. METHODS: Twenty-five CT scans of intra-articular calcaneal fractures occurring at one trauma center were reviewed. The CT images were presented to eight observers (two orthopaedic surgery chief residents, two foot and ankle fellows, two fellowship-trained orthopaedic trauma surgeons, and two fellowship-trained foot and ankle surgeons) on two separate occasions 8 weeks apart. On each viewing, observers were asked to classify the fractures according to both the Sanders and Crosby-Fitzgibbons systems. Interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility were assessed with computer-generated kappa statistics (SAS software; SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina). RESULTS: Total unanimity (eight of eight observers assigned the same fracture classification) was achieved only 24% (six of 25) of the time with the Sanders system and 36% (nine of 25) of the time with the Crosby-Fitzgibbons scheme. Interobserver reliability for the Sanders classification method reached a moderate (kappa = 0.48, 0.50) level of agreement, when the subclasses were included. The agreement level increased but remained in the moderate (kappa = 0.55, 0.55) range when the subclasses were excluded. Interobserver agreement reached a substantial (kappa = 0.63, 0.63) level with the Crosby-Fitzgibbons system. Intraobserver reproducibility was better for both schemes. The Sanders system with subclasses included reached moderate (kappa = 0.57) agreement, while ignoring the subclasses brought agreement into the substantial (kappa = 0.77) range. The overall intraobserver agreement was substantial (kappa = 0.74) for the Crosby-Fitzgibbons system. CONCLUSIONS: Although intraobserver kappa values reached substantial levels and the Crosby-Fitzgibbons system generally showed greater agreement, we were unable to demonstrate excellent interobserver or intraobserver reliability with either classification scheme. While a system with perfect agreement would be impossible, our results indicate that these classifications lack the reproducibility to be considered ideal.     

The epidemiology of elbow fracture in children: analysis of 355 fractures, with special reference to supracondylar humerus fractures

We present a study of the pattern of elbow fractures in children under 15 years of age, during a 5-year period, with special reference to supracondylar humerus fractures. The incidence was 308/100 000 per year; 58% of the children had a fracture in the supracondylar area of the humerus. There were 355 elbow fractures, and there were 164 boys (46%) and 191 girls (54%). The mean age for the entire group was 7.9 years (for boys, 7.2 years; for girls, 8.5 years). Of 209 supracondylar fractures (including 5 combination fractures), 134 were type I, 40 were type II, and 35 were type III (as classified by Gartland). Associated temporary nerve injuries involving the median, radial, and ulnar nerves were seen in 15 patients with type III supracondylar fractures. Associated brachial artery injuries were seen in 6 patients, 5 of whom had type III fractures.     

Older's classification of Colles' fractures. Good intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility in 185 cases

To evaluate the reliability of the Older classification, 4 observers classified 185 distal radius fractures twice with 1 month's interval. Both the intraobserver agreement and the interobserver agreement were high, with kappa values of 0.75 (0.69-0.79) and 0.69 (0.60-0.77), respectively. The agreement was especially high for type 1 and type 4 fractures. Older's method of classifying distal radius fractures can thus be recommended for clinical use.     

Older's classification of Colles' fractures: Good intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility in 185 cases

To evaluate the reliability of the Older classification, 4 observers classified 185 distal radius fractures twice with 1 month's interval. Both the intraobserver agreement and the interobserver agreement were high, with kappa values of 0.75 (0.69-0.79) and 0.69 (0.60-0.77), respectively. the agreement was especially high for type 1 and type 4 fractures. Older's method of classifying distal radius fractures can thus be recommended for clinical use.     

Is the modified Gartland classification system important in deciding the need for operative management of supracondylar humerus fractures?

PurposeThis study examined levels of agreement between paediatric orthopaedic surgeons in the need for operative management of extension-type supracondylar humerus fractures.MethodsThis was the second phase of a two-part study. De-identified baseline anteroposterior and lateral elbow radiographs from 60 paediatric patients with extension-type supracondylar humerus fractures were compiled. After classifying each fracture according to Gartland classification guidelines, radiographs were randomized, and surgeons indicated whether they would use operative or non-operative management to treat each fracture. Kappa statistics using pairwise comparisons were calculated to determine agreement levels.ResultsIn total, 11 international surgeons participated, and 10/11 completed both survey rounds. The overall weighted interobserver agreement was moderate (0.530, 95%CI [0.215,0.854]) while overall weighted intraobserver agreement was substantial (0.740, 95%CI [0.513,0.963]). The largest variability in preferred treatment methods between surgeons was observed for type IIA fractures, with 6/11 preferring non-operative and 5/11 preferring operative management. The largest individual surgeon variability was observed for type IIA fractures, with 8/11 showing variability (defined by not having made the same decision for at least 90% of the cases) in choosing whether to operate.ConclusionsOur findings suggest moderate interobserver, and substantial intraobserver agreement in treatment decision making. The largest disagreements between surgeons were observed for type IIA and IIB fractures and treatment decisions did not follow expected trends based on surgeons’ preferred treatment methods for each fracture type. This suggests differences in treatment approaches between surgeons in the management of type IIA fractures and highlights the role of other variables that underlie differences between surgeons’ treatment preferences.Level of evidenceIII     

Operative treatment of supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. The consequences of pin placement

BACKGROUND: The commonly accepted treatment of displaced supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children is fracture reduction and percutaneous pin fixation; however, there is controversy about the optimal placement of the pins. A crossed-pin configuration is believed to be mechanically more stable than lateral pins alone; however, the ulnar nerve can be injured with the use of a medial pin. It has not been proved that the added stability of a medial pin is clinically necessary since, in young children, pin fixation is always augmented with immobilization in a splint or cast. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the results of reduction and Kirschner wire fixation of 345 extension-type supracondylar fractures in children. Maintenance of fracture reduction and evidence of ulnar nerve injury were evaluated in relation to pin configuration and fracture pattern. Of 141 children who had a Gartland type-2 fracture (a partially intact posterior cortex), seventy-four were treated with lateral pins only and sixty-seven were treated with crossed pins. Of 204 children who had a Gartland type-3 (unstable) fracture, fifty-one were treated with lateral pins only and 153 were treated with crossed pins. RESULTS: There was no difference with regard to maintenance of fracture reduction, as seen on anteroposterior and lateral radiographs, between the crossed pins and the lateral pins. The configuration of the pins did not affect the maintenance of reduction of either the Gartland type-2 fractures or the Gartland type-3 fractures. Ulnar nerve injury was not seen in the 125 patients in whom only lateral pins were used. The use of a medial pin was associated with ulnar nerve injury in 4% (six) of 149 patients in whom the pin was applied without hyperflexion of the elbow and in 15% (eleven) of seventy-one in whom the medial pin was applied with the elbow hyperflexed. Two years after the pinning, one of the seventeen children with ulnar nerve injury had persistent motor weakness and a sensory deficit. CONCLUSIONS: Fixation with only lateral pins is safe and effective for both Gartland type-2 and Gartland type-3 (unstable) supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. The use of only lateral pins prevents iatrogenic injury to the ulnar nerve. On the basis of our findings, we do not recommend the routine use of crossed pins in the treatment of supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. If a medial pin is used, the elbow should not be hyperflexed during its insertion.     

Reliability of classification systems for intertrochanteric fractures of the proximal femur in experienced orthopaedic surgeons

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to determine the reliability of currently used classification systems for intertrochanteric fractures of the proximal femur, and to determine the reliability of these systems in experienced orthopaedic surgeons. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty intertrochanteric fractures of the proximal femur were classified independently by five experienced observers using the AO, Evans, Kyle, and Boyd classification systems on two separate occasions 3 months apart. The interobserver and intraobserver variation was assessed using kappa statistics. RESULTS: The level of agreement for classification into AO groups was almost perfect or substantial, and higher than other classification systems. When the fractures were further classified using the AO classification with subgroups, reliability became worse. CONCLUSIONS: The current study suggests that the AO classification system with groups can be used more reliably to measure intertrochanteric fractures of the proximal femur than Evans, Kyle, and Boyd classification systems. However, the reliability of the AO classification with subgroups is not satisfactory.     

Crossed pin fixation of displaced supracondylar humerus fractures in children

The results of 42 children with displaced supracondylar fractures of the humerus (six Gartland Type II and 36 Gartland Type III) treated with crossed pin fixation are reported. In 37 fractures (88%) the teardrop configuration was restored successfully. All fractures healed without loss of reduction. No patients had iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury. Crossed-pin fixation of supracondylar humeral fractures is a safe and effective way of maintaining skeletal stability in children. Careful technique safeguards against ulnar nerve injury.     

How safe is the operative treatment of Gartland type 2 supracondylar humerus fractures in children?

Whereas operative treatment of supracondylar fractures is now standard of care for Gartland type 3 supracondylar humerus fractures in children, the treatment of type 2 fractures remains somewhat controversial. The purpose of this article was to examine the safety and efficacy of closed reduction and pinning of type 2 supracondylar humerus fractures in children. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 189 type 2 supracondylar humerus fractures operatively treated at one tertiary care children's hospital from 2000 to 2006. Data were acquired from a review of radiographs and clinical notes. RESULTS: We found no intraoperative surgical or anesthetic complications in our series. None of our cases lost reduction after closed reduction and percutaneous pinning. There were 4 pin tract infections (2.1%) in our series: 3 were treated with antibiotics, and 1 needed irrigation and debridement in the operating room. This was the only patient who required reoperation for any reason. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the largest reported series of type 2 supracondylar humerus fractures in children, we found an extremely low rate of complications after closed reduction and percutaneous pinning; secondary operations were also uncommon (0.5%). Our series demonstrates a high probability of satisfactory outcome after operative treatment of type 2 supracondylar fractures compared with previous studies of children treated by closed reduction without pinning. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, level 4 (case series [no or historical control group]).     

经肘横纹前方入路治疗儿童Gartland Ⅲ型肱骨髁上骨折

目的 对于闭合复位失败或合并前方血管神经卡压的儿童Gartland Ⅲ型肱骨髁上骨折,探讨经肘横纹前方入路克氏针内固定的治疗效果. 方法自2005年4月至2008年3月对44例闭合复位失败或合并血管神经症状的儿童(2～11岁,平均4.6岁)Gartland Ⅲ型肱骨髁上骨折行开放复位,其中肘横纹前方入路19例,其他人路25例(外侧入路21例,内外侧联合入路4例).术中复位满意后克氏针内固定辅以石膏托固定,3周后行功能锻炼.以肘关节Flynn等评分系统进行评估. 结果所有患者平均随访1.8年(1～4年),经肘横纹前方入路组与其他入路组在提携角丢失及肘屈伸功能方面差异无统计学意义(肘横纹前方入路组优良率89%,其他入路组83%,P>0.05);肘横纹前方入路组的手术时间显著短于其他人路组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05). 结论经肘横纹前方入路治疗闭合复位失败或合并前方血管神经卡压的儿童Garland Ⅲ型肱骨髁上骨折,便于安全快速地获得解剖复位,利于探查骨折伴发的血管神经损伤,是一种可供选择的手术入路.     

Assessment of two thoracolumbar fracture classification systems as used by multiple surgeons

BACKGROUND: The reproducibility and repeatability of modern systems for classification of thoracolumbar injuries have not been sufficiently studied. We assessed the interobserver and intraobserver reproducibility of the AO (Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen) classification and compared it with that of the Denis classification. Our purpose was to determine whether the newer, AO system had better reproducibility than the older, Denis classification. METHODS: Anteroposterior and lateral radiographs and computerized tomography scans (axial images and sagittal reconstructions) of thirty-one acute traumatic fractures of the thoracolumbar spine were presented to nineteen observers, all trained spine surgeons, who classified the fractures according to both the AO and the Denis classification systems. Three months later, the images of the thirty-one fractures were scrambled into a different order, and the observers repeated the classification. The Cohen kappa (kappa) test was used to determine interobserver and intraobserver agreement, which was measured with regard to the three basic classifications in the AO system (types A, B, and C) as well as the nine subtypes of that system. We also measured the agreement with regard to the four basic types in the Denis classification (compression, burst, seat-belt, and fracture-dislocation) and with regard to the sixteen subtypes of that system. RESULTS: The AO classification was fairly reproducible, with an average kappa of 0.475 (range, 0.389 to 0.598) for the agreement regarding the assignment of the three types and an average kappa of 0.537 for the agreement regarding the nine subtypes. The average kappa for the agreement regarding the assignment of the four Denis fracture types was 0.606 (range, 0.395 to 0.702), and it was 0.173 for agreement regarding the sixteen subtypes. The intraobserver agreement (repeatability) was 82% and 79% for the AO and Denis types, respectively, and 67% and 56%, for the AO and Denis subtypes, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Both the Denis and the AO system for the classification of spine fractures had only moderate reliability and repeatability. The tendency for well-trained spine surgeons to classify the same fracture differently on repeat testing is a matter of some concern.     

Apparently isolated partial articular fractures of the radial head: prevalence and reliability of radiographically diagnosed displacement

The purpose of this study was to measure the prevalence and reliability of the radiographic diagnosis of displacement of apparently isolated partial articular radial head fractures and use these factors to assess treatment considerations. Among 119 radiographically visible partial fractures of the radial head not associated with other wrist, forearm, or elbow injury, 101 were classified as Mason type 1 (85%), 11 as borderline between Mason type 1 and Mason type 2 fractures (9%), and 7 as Mason type 2 fractures (6%) according to Broberg and Morrey's modification of the Mason classification. The intraobserver reliability of the classification of Mason type 1 and type 2 fractures was excellent (mean kappa, 0.85), but the interobserver reliability was only moderate (multirater kappa, 0.45). Because apparently isolated, stable partial fractures of the radial head are infrequently displaced and observers have moderate disagreement regarding the diagnosis of displacement, it is likely that displacement is overdiagnosed.