Immediate impact of an intensive one-week laparoscopy training program on laparoscopic skills among postgraduate urologists.

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic techniques are difficult to master, especially for surgeons who did not receive such training during residency. To help urologists master challenging laparoscopic skills, a unique 5-day mini-residency (M-R) program was established at the University of California, Irvine. The first 101 participants in this program were evaluated on their laparoscopic skills acquisition at the end of the 5-day experience. METHODS: Two urologists are accepted per week into 1 of 4 training modules: (1) ureteroscopy/percutaneous renal access; (2) laparoscopic ablative renal surgery; (3) laparoscopic reconstructive renal surgery; and (4) robot-assisted prostatectomy. The program consists of didactic lectures, pelvic trainer and virtual reality simulator practice, animal and cadaver laboratory sessions, and observation or participation in human surgeries. Skills testing (ST) simulating open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgery is assessed in all of the M-R participants on training days 1 and 5. Tests include ring transfer, suture threading, cutting, and suturing. Performance is evaluated by an experienced observer using the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill (OSATS) scoring system. Statistical methods used include the paired sample t test and analysis of variance at a confidence level of P相似文献   

Initial impact of a dedicated postgraduate laparoscopic mini-residency on clinical practice patterns

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Laparoscopic surgical techniques are difficult to master, especially for surgeons who did not receive this type of training during their residencies. We have established a 5-day mentor-preceptor- proctor-guided postgraduate "mini-residency" (M-R) experience in minimally invasive surgery. The initial results from the first 16 participants in the laparoscopic M-R modules are presented. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: On the first and the last day of the M-R, all participants underwent surgical skills testing using an open-surgery, standard laparoscopic, and robot-assisted laparoscopic format. A written examination was also administered on the last day. The influence of M-R on the participants' practice pattern was then assessed by a follow-up questionnaire survey 1 to 7 months after their attendance. RESULTS: Data from the first 16 participants were analyzed. Of note, the score was significantly improved for only one of the four tested laparoscopic skills (i.e., threading a suture through loops). Nonetheless, on the follow-up survey, of the 15 respondents, two laparoscopically na?ve participants had performed laparoscopic nephrectomy, and of the eight participants who had prior renal-ablative laparoscopic experience, four had performed advanced reconstructive laparoscopic cases. CONCLUSIONS: A 5-day dedicated postgraduate M-R in laparoscopy appears to be helpful for urologists wishing to incorporate this surgical approach into their practices. The "take rate" among participants is initially at the 40% level, similar to what has been previously reported after a 1 to 2-day hands-on didactic laparoscopy course.     

Mentored retroperitoneal laparoscopic renal surgery in children: a safe approach to learning

OBJECTIVE: To review the feasibility of introducing advanced retroperitoneal renal laparoscopic surgery (RRLS) to a paediatric urology division, using the mentorship-training model. Although the scope of practice in paediatric urology is currently adapting endoscopic surgery into daily practice, most paediatric urologists in North America have had no formal training in laparoscopic surgery. METHODS: The study included four paediatric urologists with 3-25 years of practice; none had had any formal laparoscopic training or ever undertaken advanced RRLS. An experienced laparoscopic surgeon (the mentor) assisted the learning surgeons over a year. The initial phases of learning incorporated detailed lectures, visualization through videotapes and 'hands-on' demonstration by the expert in the technique of the standardized steps for each type of surgery. Over 10 months, ablative and reconstructive RRLS was undertaken jointly by the surgeons and the mentor. After this training the surgeons operated independently. To prevent lengthy operations, conversion to open surgery was planned if there was no significant progression after 2 h of laparoscopic surgery. RESULTS: Over the 10 months of mentorship, 36 RRLS procedures were undertaken in 31 patients (28 ablative and eight reconstructive). In all cases the mentored surgeons accomplished both retroperitoneal access and the creation of a working space within the cavity. The group was able to initiate ablative RRLS but the mentor undertook all the reconstructive procedures. After the mentorship period, over 10 months, 12 ablative procedures were undertaken independently, and five other attempts at RRLS failed. CONCLUSION: Although the mentored approach can successfully and safely initiate advanced RRLS in a paediatric urology division, assessing the laparoscopic practice pattern after mentorship in the same group of trainees is warranted. Ablative RRLS is easier to learn for the experienced surgeon, but reconstructive procedures, e.g. pyeloplasty, require a high degree of skill in laparoscopic technique, which may only be acquired through formal training focusing primarily on suturing techniques.     

泌尿外科腹腔镜技能培训模式的初步探索

目的 初步探索合理的泌尿外科腹腔镜技能培训模式. 方法利用模拟训练箱开展腹腔镜基本技能培训.选择20～30 kg的小猪建立腹腔镜下肾部分切除术、肾盂成形术和输尿管再植术3种动物模型,然后开展有针对性的专项手术模拟训练.33名泌尿外科研究生参与培训,其中博士16名、硕士17名.初学者从基本技能培训开始,腹腔镜基本技能达剑合格水平后在动物模型上进行模拟手术培训. 结果 参与2期基本技能培训后,33名学员腹腔镜基本操作技能均达到合格水平.33名学员在完成8次肾部分切除术专项手术训练后,手术时间从(64.0±18.4)min降为(30.9±3.8)min(P<0.01),学员均熟练掌握肾肿瘤切除和肾实质腔内缝合等技术;完成8次肾盂成形术的模拟训练后,平均完成时间由(127.5±17.5)min降为(65.2±7.5)min(P<0.01),学员均能熟练完成无张力的肾盂输尿管吻合并掌握了顺行放置双J管的技巧;完成8次输尿管膀胱再植术的模拟训练后,平均手术时间从(75.8±11.6)min降为(37.7±7.2)min(P<0.01),学员均能熟练完成输尿管的分离、裁剪、缝合等操作.接受系统培训后,15名(45.5%)学员已完成了从模拟训练到临床手术的过渡,在临床开展腹腔镜手术. 结论 腹腔镜基本技能训练设备简单,成本较低,适合于初学者的培养;动物模拟手术可以全真地模拟手术过程,在动物模型上进行专项手术训练町以帮助学员更快掌握腹腔镜手术方法和技巧.基本技能培训与动物模拟手术相结合的模式较适合于腹腔镜技能的培训,有一定的临床推广价值.     

The British Association of Urological Surgeons: guidelines for training in laparoscopy

OBJECTIVE: To report the guidelines of the British Association of Urological Surgeons (BAUS), commissioned by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) in response to safety concerns about the rapid uptake of new, complex laparoscopic procedures. METHODS: A combination of expert opinion and review of published studies was used to produce a consensus document. RESULTS: Patient demand and excellent published reports have prompted many consultant urologists with little previous laparoscopic training to learn laparoscopic procedures. Laparoscopic urological surgery involves some of the most complex procedures in all of surgery and there has been a lack of formal training for consultants. The guidelines produced by BAUS are designed to help consultant urologists gain experience safely, by a combination of didactic learning and mentorship. We recommend that urologists work with a mentor and master ablative laparoscopic surgery before attempting more complex procedures such as prostatectomy, cystectomy, pyeloplasty and partial nephrectomy. These guidelines were approved by BAUS Council in October 2006. CONCLUSIONS: These guidelines are intended to be complementary to the NICE guidelines on specific procedures (available at http://www.nice.org.uk).     

Nierenbeckenplastik – pro laparoskopisch

With increasing experience and availability of the da Vinci? robotic surgery system there has been an extension of the indications from initially exclusively ablative interventions, such as nephrectomy and radical prostatectomy to reconstructive interventions, such as pyeloplasty, bladder augmentation and urinary diversion. Laparocopic pyeloplasty has been established for both adults and children, with results comparable to the open procedure. In comparison the conventional laparoscopic procedure is little cost-intensive and therefore widely used. The available literature has to be analysed to find advantages for the cost-intensive, robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty from which patients can profit.     

Exciting times: towards a totally minimally invasive paediatric urology service

Following on from the first paediatric laparoscopic nephrectomy in 1992, the growth of minimally invasive ablative and reconstructive procedures in paediatric urology has been dramatic. This article reviews the literature related to laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty, optimising posterior urethral valve ablation and intravesical laparoscopic ureteric reimplantation.     

The position of laparoscopic surgery in pediatric urology

With growing experience in laparoscopic techniques there is a switch in pediatrics from ablative surgery to reconstructive procedures. Besides the established procedures such as laparoscopic nephrectomy and orchidopexy, procedures like heminephrectomy and pyeloplasty have proven practicable and become standard therapies in children and infants. Due to technical advances, as shown for our own patients, the number of treated infants is still increasing. However, laparoscopic reconstructive procedures presuppose a good deal of experience in preparation and suture techniques, and remain reserved for centers with daily experience in laparoscopy. Daily experience with difficult urological laparoscopic procedures in adults will remain more common than in pediatric centres.     

Training postgraduate urologists in laparoscopic surgery: the current challenge

PURPOSE: We established a new mini-fellowship training model for teaching laparoscopic urological surgery to practicing urologists that provides a learning experience beyond that of a pelvic trainer or hands-on, animal laboratory based laparoscopic course. It provides the practitioner with clinical experience under mentor direct guidance and supervision before embarking on independent laparoscopic surgery at an individual hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A mini-fellowship model was developed that consists of 3 phases, namely 1) completing a 2 to 3-day hands-on course in laparoscopy, including pelvic trainers and an animal model, 2) observing a clinical mentor perform 6 or more major renal laparoscopic cases and 3) performing 6 or more major renal procedures under mentor direct guidance in trainee patients at the mentor or trainee hospital after obtaining appropriate temporary privileges. RESULTS: Two community urologists underwent the mini-fellowship program in 2000. Trainee 1 performed 30 laparoscopic procedures, including 17 radical nephrectomies, 4 simple nephrectomies, 4 nephroureterectomies, 4 renal cyst ablations and 1 renal biopsy, within the first 8 months after training and hospital accreditation. Trainee 2 performed 10 laparoscopic procedures within the first 3 months after training and hospital accreditation. CONCLUSIONS: This mini-fellowship model provides practicing urologists with a clinically applicable teaching experience to learn a new surgical concept using a familiar training pattern. It may be a more rapid and safe process of disseminating laparoscopic urological surgery to community urologists. Based on this model it would be possible for centers of excellence in each state to establish similar training programs for the corresponding urological community, thereby, bringing the teaching of new surgical skills to a more clinically relevant level.     

Robotische Chirurgie in der Kinderurologie

The increasing experience obtained through laparoscopy has resulted in the evolution of ablative and reconstructive procedures in the field of paediatric urology. Apart from the established methods of laparoscopic nephrectomy and orchidopexy, nowadays laparoscopic hemi-nephrectomy and pyeloplasty have become standard therapeutic surgical alternatives. Nevertheless, many of these procedures require a high level of experience in laparoscopic preparation and stitching techniques and are thus performed in institutions with greater laparoscopic experience. With the introduction and evolution of the robotic-assisted technique and the availability of smaller instruments and ports (8 and 5 mm), there has been an evolution in the spectrum of complex ablative and reconstructive procedures in the field of paediatric urology as well. Nevertheless, there is a lack of randomised trails and the literature available in this area consists manly of case reports. The purpose of this article is to present the current status and perspectives of robotic-assisted surgery in the field of paediatric urology.     

Complications of 2,775 urological laparoscopic procedures: 1993 to 2005

PURPOSE: We assessed the complications associated with urological laparoscopic surgery at a single high volume center during a 12-year period. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart analysis was performed, focusing on complications associated with 2,775 laparoscopic surgeries occurring between 1993 and 2005. These included radical nephrectomy (549), partial nephrectomy (345), donor nephrectomy (553), simple nephrectomy (186), pyeloplasty (301), nephroureterectomy (105), retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (86), renal ablation (81), adrenalectomy (106) and radical prostatectomy (463). Complication data were tabulated according to case number, procedure type, patient age, the American Society of Anesthesiologists score, conversion status, length of hospitalization, Clavien classification system and annual complication rate during the study. Statistical analysis was performed with Fisher's exact and chi-square tests. RESULTS: A total of 614 complications (22.1%) occurred within each group, broken down into laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (20%), laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (28%), laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (28%), laparoscopic simple nephrectomy (15%), laparoscopic pyeloplasty (13.3%), laparoscopic nephroureterectomy (40.9%), laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (26.7%), laparoscopic renal tumor ablation (18.6%), laparoscopic adrenalectomy (25.4%) and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (15%). Total intraoperative and postoperative complication rates were 4.7% and 17.5%, respectively. Vascular injuries were the most common intraoperative complications. Annual complication rates plateaued in the year 2000 and were not significantly different during the ensuing 4 years (p >0.05). Complications correlated with a greater American Society of Anesthesiologists score as well as a longer hospital stay (p <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The data presented here help define the complication rates for laparoscopic urological procedures in experienced hands at a high volume institution.     

Scarless single port transumbilical nephrectomy and pyeloplasty: first clinical report

Associate Editor Ash Tewari Editorial Board Ralph Clayman, USA Inderbir Gill, USA Roger Kirby, UK Mani Menon, USA

OBJECTIVE

To report the initial clinical cases of scarless, single port, transumbilical nephrectomy and pyeloplasty.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One patient each underwent single port transumbilical nephrectomy and pyeloplasty using the R‐Port (Advanced Surgical Concepts), inserted through a transumbilical incision in both cases. Novel, specialized instruments, curved at the shaft, were used in addition to standard laparoscopic instrumentation. During pyeloplasty, a 2‐mm needle‐port (MiniSite, USSC, Norfolk, CT, USA) was also inserted, with no skin incision, to facilitate suturing.

RESULTS

Both procedures were technically successful with no extra‐umbilical skin incisions. The total operative duration was 3.4 and 2.7 h, the estimated blood loss 100 and 50 mL, and the hospital stay was 1 and 2 days for the nephrectomy and pyeloplasty, respectively. There were no complications during or after surgery. The total analgesia requirement was 100 and 150 mg of keterolac, and visual analogue pain scores were 8/10 and 2/10 at 1 and 2 days after surgery, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Transumbilical, single port nephrectomy and pyeloplasty are technically feasible. The first initial clinical experience of organ‐ablative and reconstructive renal surgery with this approach is reported.     

Laparoscopic practice patterns among North American urologists 5 years after formal training

PURPOSE: We assessed urologist laparoscopy practice patterns 5 years after a postgraduate training course in urological laparoscopic surgery. Results were compared to findings from similar studies performed on the same cohort at 3 and 12 months after training. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 1991 and November 1992, 11, 2-day university sponsored, postgraduate laparoscopic surgery training programs were held. A survey was mailed to the 322 North American participants in the summer of 1997 to determine current laparoscopic use and experience. RESULTS: Of the 166 respondents (51% response rate) 53.6% (89) had performed 1 or more laparoscopic procedures in the previous year, compared to 84% 1 year following course completion. Of the respondents 37% believed their laparoscopic experience was sufficient to maintain skills compared to 66% at 1 year. Of the respondents 6% had performed more laparoscopic procedures while 82% had performed fewer than anticipated. Reasons cited for decreased use included decreasing and/or lack of indications, increased cost, decreased patient interest, higher complication rates, decreased institutional support and increased operative time. Respondents practicing in academic or residency affiliated centers, or those who had completed residency after 1980 were more likely to have performed more procedures than anticipated (p = 0.044) compared to community based colleagues. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic use by urologists trained in the postgraduate setting is decreasing. Few respondents are maintaining the skills acquired during the original training course. Decreased use appears to be multifactorial.     

Survey of residency training in laparoscopic and robotic surgery

PURPOSE: We determined the current status of residency training in laparoscopic and robotic surgery in the United States and Canada. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 1,188 surveys were sent via the Internet to all 1,056 current urology residents and 132 program directors with an Internet address registered with the American Urological Association. RESULTS: Responses were received from 372 residents (35%) and 56 program directors (42%). Of respondents 47% reported greater than 100 laparoscopic procedures performed yearly by 1 (36%) or more (51%) faculty members. Robotic procedures were performed at 54% of the institutions, mainly consisting of prostatectomy and pyeloplasty. At all institutions laparoscopic radical nephrectomy was performed and those at 69% of the institutions believed that it is the gold standard for renal tumors today. Urologists were involved in 87% of adrenal surgeries and 54% of respondents believed that is the gold standard approach. However, only 35% of respondents had participated in laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Of respondents 36%, 42% and 17% reported that laparoscopic donor nephrectomy was performed by only urologists, only a nonurology transplant team and shared equally, respectively. Of respondents 41% planned on performing laparoscopic donor nephrectomy in the next year. Laparoscopic needle ablation renal surgery was done in 51% of the programs and percutaneous needle ablation was done in 63%. None of the respondents (0%) believed that it is the gold standard but 51% believed that ablative procedures look promising for renal tumors. Of respondents 39% had participated in robotic radical prostatectomy and 53% thought that it looked promising but was not the gold standard. Of respondents 31% believed that they will be performing robotic surgery after residency, 30% were unsure and 29% will not be using the robot. Overall 38% of residents thought that their laparoscopic experience was at least average or acceptable. CONCLUSIONS: A large number of laparoscopic urological procedures are being performed at training institutions with robotic procedures being performed at 54% of respondent facilities. Residents are participating in most cases but only 38% consider their laparoscopic experience to be satisfactory. A need still exists for increased laparoscopic training for residents, which can be accomplished by expanding training facilities and increasing the number of faculty members performing laparoscopic procedures.     

Financial analysis of open versus laparoscopic radical nephrectomy and nephroureterectomy

PURPOSE: Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy and nephroureterectomy are rapidly becoming established procedures in select patients with renal cell carcinoma and upper tract transitional cell carcinoma, respectively. We present a retrospective comparative analysis of laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy and nephroureterectomy from a financial standpoint. The effect of the learning curve on costs incurred was also evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Detailed itemized cost data on 18 contemporary cases of open radical nephrectomy performed from September 1997 to July 1998 were compared with similar data on 20 initial laparoscopic cases performed from September 1997 to July 1998 and 15 more recent laparoscopic radical nephrectomy cases performed from August 1998 to July 1999. Financial data were also compared on 14 contemporary patients each who underwent open radical nephroureterectomy from June 1997 to December 1999, initial laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy from June 1997 to December 1998 and more recent laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy from January 1999 to October 2000. Yearly financial costs were adjusted for inflation by a 4% annual rate to reflect year 2000 data. RESULTS: For radical nephrectomy mean operative time in the 18 open, 20 initial laparoscopic and 15 recent laparoscopic cases was 185.3, 205.7 and 147.3 minutes, respectively. Mean specimen weight was 555, 616 and 558 gm., and mean hospital stay was 132, 31 and 23 hours, respectively. Compared with open radical nephrectomy mean total costs associated with initial laparoscopy were 33% greater (p = 0.0003). Mean intraoperative costs were 102% greater and mean postoperative costs were 50% less. In contrast, the more recent laparoscopic cases were an overall mean of 12% less expensive than open surgery (p = 0.05). Mean intraoperative costs were only 33% greater and mean postoperative costs were 68% less. For radical nephroureterectomy mean operative time in the 14 open, 14 initial laparoscopic and 14 recent laparoscopic cases was 246, 196 and 195 minutes, respectively. Mean specimen weight was 442, 517 and 531 gm., and mean hospital stay was 142, 63 and 32 hours, respectively. Compared with open radical nephroureterectomy mean total costs associated with initial laparoscopic cases were 28% greater (p = 0.03). Mean intraoperative costs were 65% greater and mean postoperative costs were 27% less. In contrast, the more recent laparoscopic cases were an overall mean of 6% less expensive than open surgery (p = 0.63). Mean intraoperative costs were only 31% greater and mean postoperative costs were 62% less. CONCLUSIONS: Initially in the learning curve laparoscopic radical nephrectomy and nephroureterectomy were 33% and 28% financially more expensive, respectively, than their open counterparts. However, with increased operator experience and efficiency resulting in more rapid operative time and decreased hospitalization laparoscopic radical nephrectomy and nephroureterectomy are currently 12% and 6% less expensive, respectively, than their open counterparts at our institution.     

Trends toward laparoscopic nephrectomy at a community hospital

PURPOSE: For proper indications at university hospitals laparoscopic nephrectomy is often considered the standard of care. At community hospitals past surveys have not demonstrated this change. We describe the changing practice patterns of performing laparoscopic nephrectomies in indicated patients at our community hospital. We reviewed our data on monitoring our training program. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed of 381 consecutive complete nephrectomies performed at our institution from February 2000 to December 2003, including 62 live donor nephrectomies. Patient age, pathological size, operative time, estimated blood loss, duration to solid food intake and duration of hospitalization were compared between open nephrectomy and laparoscopic nephrectomy groups using the Wilcoxon 2-sample test. Surgical practice and surgeon characteristics were also described. RESULTS: Patients who underwent laparoscopic nephrectomy demonstrated superior postoperative recovery with earlier return to solid diet and shorter hospitalization. The 2 groups were similar in regard to major complication rates. The number of laparoscopic nephrectomies increased annually, while the number of open nephrectomies decreased. The number of laparoscopic urologists increased annually. More importantly laparoscopic urologists performed an increasing number of nephrectomies, while nonlaparoscopic urologists faced a decrease in the number of nephrectomies performed. There appeared to be little evidence of hand assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy as a bridge to learning standard laparoscopic nephrectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Our training paradigm has safely and effectively trained community urologists to perform laparoscopic nephrectomies. Laparoscopic nephrectomy is now considered a standard treatment option along with conventional open surgery and it should be offered to the patient in the medical setting. Although fellowship trained urologists can certainly add expertise to any program, community based hospitals do not have to depend on them.     

Hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy: prospective evaluation of the learning curve

PURPOSE: Laparoscopic nephrectomy (LN) has recently become an emerging standard for extirpative surgery of the kidney. LN has historically proven to have a steep learning curve with longer operative times until a surgeon gains adequate laparoscopic experience. Hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy (HALN) is fast becoming a commonly used procedure to remove kidneys as it may have a reduced learning curve compared to standard LN. To date no prospective studies have evaluated the learning curve of HALN with regard to improvements in operative times and technical difficulty. We prospectively evaluated the learning curve for HALN in a residency training program as it compares to open nephrectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: HALN was performed in 30 consecutive patients for various indications. The senior urology resident functioned as the primary surgeon and the same attending surgeon was present throughout all cases. All participating residents had to have performed at least 15 open nephrectomies to serve as an internal, personal reference. Difficulty scores were obtained at the completion of the case from the resident surgeon comparing HALN to open nephrectomy, which ranged from 1 to 5. Operative times, estimated blood losses and lengths of stay were obtained at the time of surgery and hospitalization. RESULTS: Median difficulty score was equivalent to open nephrectomy for the first case but decreased significantly by case 4 (p = 0.0006). Median operative times decreased significantly from 178 minutes in the first cases to 85 minutes by case 6 (p = 0.0002). Estimated blood loss and length of hospitalization did not differ significantly. CONCLUSIONS: HALN has a relatively short learning curve reflected by the rapid decrease in difficulty scores and operative times by case 4. Similar results may be expected when training practicing urologists to perform HALN.     

Multi-institutional study of complications in 1085 laparoscopic urologic procedures

Objectives. To assess the incidence of the complications in laparoscopic urologic procedures with regard to clinical presentation, etiology, and treatment.Methods. From January 1994 to December 2000, 1085 laparoscopic procedures were performed at three institutions in 1075 patients (702 men, 373 women). A referent surgeon for laparoscopy was at each institution. The major procedures were radical prostatectomy (n = 232), different types of nephrectomy (n = 171) and nephroureterectomy (n = 15), adrenalectomy (n = 130), pyeloplasty (n = 61), pelvic lymph node dissection (n = 130), genitourinary prolapse repair (n = 86), bladder neck suspension (n = 104), and treatment of benign kidney pathologic findings (lithiasis, cysts, and diverticula, n = 55). The complications were listed by incidence and etiology according to the procedure attempted.Results. A total of 75 complications (6.9%) occurred in this multi-institutional series. The mortality rate was 0.09%, and the conversion rate was 2.1%. Vascular (n = 7) and visceral injuries (n = 11) occurred in 24% of complications. Hematomas (n = 10), urinomas (n = 8), and wound infections (n = 7) at the trocar sites were the most frequent postoperative surgical complications. Pulmonary disorders (n = 9) and urinary infections (n = 9) were predominant in the postoperative medical problems.Conclusions. Even though it appears to be minimally invasive, laparoscopy remains major surgery, with serious complications possible. These complications should be preventable with better mastery of the different steps of the procedures. Increased knowledge of the possible complications is essential for urologists in laparoscopic training and may help them improve their learning curve.     

Comparison of laparoscopic versus open nephrectomy in the pediatric population

PURPOSE: Laparoscopic renal surgery has become an accepted approach for benign disease in adults. We compare our experience with laparoscopic and open nephrectomy in a pediatric population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 10 pediatric patients underwent laparoscopic nephrectomy or nephroureterectomy and an additional 10 consecutive children underwent similar open procedures. All patients had benign disease and were treated at a single institution. Medical records were reviewed retrospectively for relevant clinical data. RESULTS: Planned surgery was completed in all cases. There were no conversions to open surgery in the laparoscopic group. Mean operative time was 175.6 versus 120.2 minutes (p = 0.01) and mean hospital stay was 22.5 versus 41.3 hours (p = 0.03) in the laparoscopic and open nephrectomy groups, respectively. Blood loss was not statistically different. Analgesic use was qualitatively less in the laparoscopic nephrectomy group. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic nephrectomy and nephroureterectomy may be performed safely in children. While operative time was somewhat longer in our initial laparoscopic series, postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter than for open surgery. Further experience with this technique is warranted.