A phase I study of gemcitabine and docetaxel in patients with metastatic solid tumors

BACKGROUND: A Phase I study was initiated to determine the maximum tolerated dose of weekly gemcitabine combined with monthly, fixed-dose docetaxel. METHODS: Patients with metastatic solid tumors were treated with docetaxel, 60 mg/m(2), on Day 1 every 28 days. Gemcitabine was administered on Days 1, 8, and 15 and underwent dose adjustment in cohorts of 3-6 patients. At the maximum tolerated dose, 11 additional patients were enrolled. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients received 85 cycles of therapy. At the first dose level, the planned gemcitabine dose on Days 1, 8, and 15 was 800 mg/m(2). Two of the 6 patients treated at this dose level experienced dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) requiring the reduction of gemcitabine to 600 mg/m(2) per dose and the administration of ciprofloxacin, 500 mg orally twice daily, on Days 8-18. At the second dose level the first 3 patients experienced no DLTs and the dose of gemcitabine was increased to 700 mg/m(2). Two of the 6 patients treated at the 700 mg/m(2) dose level experienced DLTs. Eleven additional patients were enrolled at the recommended Phase II dose of gemcitabine (600 mg/m(2)). At this dose level, Grade 3/4 (according the National Cancer Institute's common toxicity criteria) neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 12.5% and 2.1% of cycles, respectively. Grade 3 and 4 nonhematologic toxicities were uncommon. Three of seven evaluable patients with pancreatic carcinoma had evidence of significant antineoplastic activity (three partial responses). In addition, two complete responses (one patient with gastric carcinoma and one patient with ovarian carcinoma) and one partial response (patient with hepatocellular carcinoma) were noted in patients with other solid tumors. CONCLUSIONS: The regimen comprised of docetaxel, 60 mg/m(2), on Day 1 and gemcitabine, 600 mg/m(2), on Days 1, 8, and 15 with ciprofloxacin on Days 8-18 every 28 days is safe, well tolerated, and active.     

A phase I study of erlotinib in combination with gemcitabine and radiation in locally advanced, non-operable pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of erlotinib when administered concurrently with twice weekly gemcitabine and radiation therapy (RT) for locally advanced pancreatic cancer, assess the safety and toxicity profile of this combination and secondarily evaluate response, time to tumor progression and overall survival. METHODS: Patients with untreated locally advanced pancreas cancer were treated with daily erlotinib in combination with gemcitabine 40 mg/m(2)/30 min twice weekly and RT delivered at 180 cGy/day in 28 fractions over 5.5 weeks for a total of 5040 cGy. Erlotinib was dose escalated in successive cohorts (100 mg, 125 mg). When the MTD was determined, the cohort was expanded to better define toxicity and preliminarily efficacy. All patients were surgically staged. After chemoradiation, patients received maintenance weekly gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 of a 21 day cycle and daily erlotinib for four cycles. RESULTS: Three patients were treated at dose level 1 (erlotinib 100 mg) without limiting toxicity. Two of six patients at dose level 2 (erlotinib 125 mg) had dose-limiting toxicities, neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, causing dose delay and elevated liver enzymes. The MTD for erlotinib in combination with twice weekly gemcitabine-based chemoradiation was 100 mg/day. Eleven additional patients were treated at dose level 1. All twenty patients were assessable for toxicity. Seventeen patients were assessable for response. The partial response rate was 35% and 53% had stable disease. The median survival for all patients was 18.7 months. CONCLUSION: In combination with fixed dose gemcitabine at 40 mg/m(2) twice weekly and radiation at 180 cGy/day, the MTD of erlotinib was found to be 100 mg/day. This is a relatively well tolerated, biologically active combination in a poor prognostic cancer.     

Multicenter dose-finding study of concurrent capecitabine and radiotherapy as adjuvant treatment for operable rectal cancer

PURPOSE: 5-Fluorouracil-based chemotherapy with concurrent radiotherapy (RT) is the standard adjuvant treatment in rectal cancer. A Phase I study was conducted to determine the maximal tolerated dose and the dose-limiting toxicities of capecitabine combined with standard RT as adjuvant treatment in patients with rectal cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with Stage II-III rectal cancer after surgery were eligible. RT included a total dose of 50.4 Gy in fractions of 1.8 Gy/d, 5 d/wk, for 5.5 weeks. Capecitabine was administered twice daily in escalating doses during the entire period of RT. Dose-limiting toxicity included Grade 4 neutropenia or thrombocytopenia, febrile neutropenia, Grade 3 or greater nonhematologic toxicity, or treatment delay because of unresolved toxicity for >1 week. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients were enrolled at the following dose levels: 1000 mg/m(2)/d (3 patients), 1150 mg/m(2)/d (4 patients) 1300 mg/m(2)/d (6 patients), 1400 mg/m(2)/d (6 patients), 1500 mg/m(2)/d (3 patients), 1600 mg/m(2)/d (3 patients), and 1700 mg/m(2)/d (6 patients). Dose-limiting toxicities were observed in 2 patients at 1300 mg/m(2)/d (Grade 3 diarrhea), and 2 patients at 1400 mg/m(2)/d (skin toxicity in 1 and abdominal pain with fever in 1, resulting in treatment delay), and 3 patients at 1700 mg/m(2)/d (2 patients had Grade 3 diarrhea and 1 had hand-foot syndrome). Four patients presented with chronic postradiation colitis. CONCLUSIONS: The maximal tolerated dose of capecitabine given concurrently with RT was 1600 mg/m(2)/d in this study. This dose is recommended for additional use in Phase II-III studies.     

Phase I trial of strictly time-scheduled gemcitabine and cisplatin with concurrent radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer

PURPOSE: Maximal therapeutic gain in xenograft sarcoma and toxicity for jejunal mucosa is time dependent for concurrent gemcitabine and radiotherapy (RT). We used a time-dependent schedule to determine the maximal-tolerated dose and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs; Grade 4 hematologic or Grade 3 other toxicity). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with pancreatic cancer (n = 33), periampullary carcinoma (n = 1), or bile duct cancer (n = 2) were treated with 3-day conformal RT with 50.4 Gy (tumor, lymphatics) plus a 5.4-Gy boost. Concurrent cisplatin (20 mg/m(2)/d on Days 1-5 and 29-33) and gemcitabine (initially 600 mg/m(2), weekly on Fridays 68 h before RT) were administered. Because of DLT, the doses were reduced to 500 mg/m(2) weekly and then 500, 400, or 300 mg/m(2) on Days 2, 5, 26, 33. RESULTS: DLT occurred at all dose levels of gemcitabine >300 mg/m(2). Fourteen patients were treated at the recommended Phase II dose of gemcitabine (300 mg/m(2)) without DLT. The response to chemoradiation allowed 10 of 30 initially unresectable patients with primary pancreatic carcinoma to undergo radical surgery, including a complete response in 2 cases. CONCLUSIONS: At the recommended Phase II dose, chemoradiation with gemcitabine and cisplatin can be administered safely in pancreatic carcinoma. However, at higher dose levels, toxicity is severe and frequent. Patients with a chance for conversion to resection could benefit from this schedule.     

High incidence of pulmonary toxicity of weekly docetaxel and gemcitabine in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: results of a dose-finding study

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum tolerated doses (MTD) and the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of the weekly administration of docetaxel and gemcitabine as first-line treatment in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Chemotherapy-na?ve patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed unresectable stage III(B) or IV NSCLC were enrolled onto the study. Escalated doses of gemcitabine (starting dose 700 mg/m(2) per week) and docetaxel (starting dose 30 mg/m(2) per week) were given on a weekly basis for three consecutive weeks in cycles of 4 weeks. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients received a total of 94 chemotherapy cycles. At the doses of docetaxel 40 mg/m(2) per week and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) per week, the MTD had not yet been reached. However, the study was prematurely closed because of a high incidence of severe pulmonary adverse events. Six (23%) patients developed fever and pulmonary dysfunction (severe dyspnea, hypoxia in association with diffuse interstitial pneumonitis), which was fatal in two of them. No risk factors were identified contributing to these pulmonary adverse events; four patients had a low absolute number of peripheral blood CD4+ lymphocytes. Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in five (19%) patients and grade 3/4 anemia in two (8%). CONCLUSION: The weekly administration of gemcitabine and docetaxel in patients with advanced NSCLC is associated with a high incidence of severe pulmonary toxicity, which does not seem to be dose-related. The regimen cannot be used outside a clinical protocol.     

Phase I North Central Cancer Treatment Group Trial-N9923 of escalating doses of twice-daily thoracic radiation therapy with amifostine and with alternating chemotherapy in limited stage small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE: The primary goal was to identify the maximum tolerable dose (MTD) of thoracic radiation therapy (TRT) that can be given with chemotherapy and amifostine for patients with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (LSCLC). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Treatment began with two cycles of topotecan (1 mg/m(2)) Days 1 to 5 and paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2)) Day 5 (every 3 weeks) given before and after TRT. The TRT began at 6 weeks. The TRT was given in 120 cGy fractions b.i.d. and the dose escalation (from 4,800 cGy, dose level 1, to 6,600 cGy, dose level 4) followed the standard "cohorts of 3" design. The etoposide (E) (50 mg/day) and cisplatin (C) (3 mg/m(2)) were given i.v. before the morning TRT and amifostine (500 mg/day) was given before the afternoon RT. This was followed by prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI). The dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were defined as Grade > or =4 hematologic, febrile neutropenia, esophagitis, or other nonhematologic toxicity, Grade > or =3 dyspnea, or Grade > or =2 pneumonitis. RESULTS: Fifteen patients were evaluable for the Phase I portion of the trial. No DLTs were seen at dose levels 1 and 2. Two patients on dose level 4 experienced DLTs: 1 patient had a Grade 4 pneumonitis, dyspnea, fatigue, hypokalemia, and anorexia, and 1 patient had a Grade 5 hypoxia attributable to TRT. One of 6 patients on dose level 3 had a DLT, Grade 3 esophagitis. The Grade > or =3 toxicities seen in at least 10% of patients during TRT were esophagitis (53%), leukopenia (33%), dehydration (20%), neutropenia (13%), and fatigue (13%). The median survival was 14.5 months. CONCLUSION: The MTD of b.i.d. TRT was 6000 cGy (120 cGy b.i.d.) with EP and amifostine.     

Phase I study to evaluate multiple regimens of intravenous 5-fluorouracil administered in combination with weekly gemcitabine in patients with advanced solid tumors: a potential broadly active regimen for advanced solid tumor malignancies.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose and toxicity profile of gemcitabine given on a weekly schedule with continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients with advanced solid tumors received escalating doses of gemcitabine 200 and 300 mg/m(2) weekly as a 30-minute infusion on Days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks (schedule 1) or 450, 600, 800, 1000, 1250, 1500, 1800, and 2200 mg/m(2) on Days 1 and 8 (schedule 2) every 3 weeks, respectively. At the completion of gemcitabine infusion (Day 1), patients received fixed dose continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil at either 300 mg/m(2) (Days 1-21) or 200 mg/m(2) (Days 1-21; schedule 1) every 4 weeks or 200 mg/m(2) (Days 1-14; schedule 2] every 3 weeks, respectively. Toxicity assessments were performed weekly on study, and efficacy measurements were performed every 6-8 weeks. RESULTS: Seventy patients with advanced solid malignancies received a total of 220 cycles of combination chemotherapy. Eleven (14.3%) patients received no more than 1 treatment cycle of combination therapy. Schedule 1 maximum tolerated dose of gemcitabine was 600 mg/m(2)/week when combined with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) at 200 mg/m(2)/day (Days 1-21) repeated every 4 weeks. The schedule 2 maximum tolerated dose of gemcitabine was 2200 mg/m(2)/week when combined with 5-FU dosed at 200 mg/m(2)/day (Days 1-14) repeated every 3 weeks. In schedule 1, the limiting factor for gemcitabine delivery was the Day 15 dose that often was omitted because of myelosuppression and/or mucositis. In schedule 1 cycle 1, nonhematologic toxicity was common and included Grade 3-4 toxicities: mucositis (8 patients), fatigue (2 patients), and anorexia (1 patient). One patient had Grade 3-4 neutropenia at dose level 5 (maximum tolerated dose). In schedule 2 cycle 1, hematologic toxicities were more common than nonhematologic toxicity and included Grade 3 anemia (3 patients), Grade 3 neutropenia (4 patients), and Grade 3 thrombocytopenia (2 patients). The nonhematologic toxicities included Grade 3 mucositis (3 patients), Grade 3 fatigue (2 patients), and Grade 3 dehydration (1 patient). Overall, antitumor activity was observed in seven patients. Three of 30 patients with cytokine refractory renal cell carcinoma (RCC; relative risk [RR] 10 %; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.82-22%) had a partial response. Of the remaining 27 patients with RCC, 4 patients had a minor response, and 10 patients had stable disease lasting a median of 6.4 (range, 4-12) months. The remaining 5 responses occurred in 40 patients (RR, 12.5%; 95% CI, 4.2-26.8%): 2 patients with 5-FU refractory colon carcinoma, 1 patient with hepatoma, 1 patient with paclitaxel-cisplatin-resistant ovarian carcinoma, and 1 patient with cisplatin-resistant head and neck squamous cell carcinoma had a partial response. CONCLUSIONS: For Phase II development, gemcitabine 450-600 mg/m(2) on Days 1, 8, and 15 can be safely combined with 5-FU 200 mg/m(2) given as a continuous infusion (Days 1-21) of a 28-day cycle or gemcitabine 1800 mg/m(2) Days 1 and 8 given with 5-FU 200 mg/m(2) as a continuous infusion (Days 1-14) of a 21-day cycle. The observed antitumor activity in several solid tumors, especially in renal cell carcinoma, warrants broad Phase II evaluation.     

Phase I clinical trial of parenteral hydroxyurea in combination with pelvic and para-aortic external radiation and brachytherapy for patients with advanced squamous cell cancer of the uterine cervix

PURPOSE: Oral hydroxyurea (HU) is a potent radiation sensitizer, but in vitro studies have suggested that prolonged exposure to HU by way of continuous parenteral infusion would enhance clinical efficacy. The objective of this study was to determine the maximal tolerated dose and identify the toxicities of continuous infusion HU in combination with pelvic and para-aortic external beam radiotherapy (RT) and intrauterine brachytherapy in patients with locally advanced carcinoma of the uterine cervix. METHODS: This Phase I study of concomitant RT was designed with an escalating dose schedule of HU administered by continuous infusion. HU was administered parenterally as a continuous infusion, 5 d/wk, during the first 21 days of external radiation, during the final 5 days of external beam RT, followed by another 5-day infusion schedule bracketing the single fraction of brachytherapy. The maximal tolerated dose was defined as the highest dose level at which 3 of 3 or 5 of 6 patients could be treated without dose-limiting toxicity. RESULTS: At dose level 1 (0.25 mg/m(2)/min), 0 of 4 patients experienced Grade 4 toxicities and 2 patients experienced Grade 3 hematologic toxicities that were not considered dose-limiting. One of the first 4 patients at level 2 (0.375 mg/m(2)/min) had Grade 3 diarrhea, but the 3 subsequent patients tolerated the dose. At level 3 (0.5 mg/m(2)/min), 4 of 5 patients failed to complete therapy without a >7-day interruption in HU. CONCLUSIONS: The maximal tolerated dose of parenteral HU was 0.375 mg/m(2)/min when administered with concomitant RT. The most common toxicities were hematologic. A new trial, incorporating concurrent cisplatin, HU, and RT is planned.     

A parallel dose-escalation study of weekly and twice-weekly bortezomib in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin in the first-line treatment of patients with advanced solid tumors.

PURPOSE: To establish maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and tolerability of two schedules of bortezomib in combination with cisplatin and gemcitabine as first-line treatment of patients with advanced solid tumors. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients were assigned to increasing doses of bortezomib days 1 and 8 (weekly schedule) or days 1, 4, 8, and 11 (twice-weekly schedule), in addition to gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) days 1 and 8 and cisplatin 70 mg/m(2) day 1, every 21 days. Maximum of six cycles. Plasma pharmacokinetics of cisplatin and gemcitabine were determined at MTD. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were enrolled of whom 27 had non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Diarrhea, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia were dose-limiting toxicities leading to an MTD of bortezomib 1.0 mg/m(2) in the weekly schedule. Febrile neutropenia and thrombocytopenia with bleeding were dose-limiting toxicities in the twice-weekly schedule, leading to an MTD of bortezomib 1.0 mg/m(2) as well. Most common > or =grade 3 treatment-related toxicities were thrombocytopenia and neutropenia. No grade > or =3 treatment-related sensory neuropathy was reported. Of 34 evaluable patients, 13 achieved partial responses, 17 stable disease, and 4 progressive disease. Response and survival of NSCLC patients treated with twice weekly or weekly bortezomib were similar. However, increased dose intensity of bortezomib led to increased gastrointestinal toxicity as well as myelosuppression. Pharmacokinetic profiles of cisplatin and gemcitabine were not significantly different in patients receiving either schedule. CONCLUSIONS: Weekly bortezomib 1.0 mg/m(2) plus gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) and cisplatin 70 mg/m(2) is the recommended phase 2 schedule, constituting a safe combination, with activity in NSCLC.     

Gemcitabine,paclitaxel, and radiation for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a Phase I trial

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicities of gemcitabine, paclitaxel, and concurrent radiation for pancreatic cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty patients with locally unresectable pancreatic cancer were studied. The initial dose level was gemcitabine 75 mg/m(2) and paclitaxel 40 mg/m(2) weekly for 6 weeks. Concurrent radiation to 50.4 Gy was delivered in 1.8 Gy fractions. The radiation fields included the primary tumor, plus the regional peripancreatic, celiac, and porta hepatis lymph nodes. RESULTS: Dose-limiting toxicities of diarrhea, dehydration, nausea, and anorexia occurred in 3 of 3 patients at the second dose level of gemcitabine, 150 mg/m(2)/week. An intermediate dose level of gemcitabine, 110 mg/m(2)/week, was added, but gastrointestinal toxicity and pulmonary pneumonitis were encountered. The MTD therefore was gemcitabine 75 mg/m(2)/week with paclitaxel 40 mg/m(2)/week and concurrent radiation. Two of 11 patients treated at the MTD had Grade 3/4 toxicity. Four of 10 assessable patients treated at the MTD responded (40%), including one pathologic complete response. CONCLUSION: The maximum tolerated dosage of gemcitabine is 75 mg/m(2)/week with paclitaxel 40 mg/m(2)/week and conventional 50.4 Gy radiation fields. A Phase II Radiation Therapy Oncology Group study is under way.     

Phase I study of weekly paclitaxel and liposomal doxorubicin in patients with advanced solid tumours

The aim of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) of a weekly administration of paclitaxel and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (Caelyx; Schering Plough Pharmaceutical) in patients with advanced solid tumours. 19 pretreated patients with solid tumours received escalated doses of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (6-12 mg/m(2)) as a 1-h intravenous (i.v.) infusion followed by a fixed dose of paclitaxel (80 mg/m(2)) weekly for 4 consecutive weeks in cycles of 6 weeks. DLT was defined as grade 4 neutropenia or thrombocytopenia, febrile neutropenia, grades 3 or 4 non-haematological toxicity or treatment delay due to unresolved toxicity during cycle 1. The MTD was reached at the dose of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin of 10 mg/m(2)/week and paclitaxel of 80 mg/m(2)/week. The DLTs were treatment delay due to grade 3 neutropenia and grade 3 diarrhoea. A total of 55 chemotherapy cycles were administered, and grades 3-4 neutropenia occurred in seven cycles (13%); the non-haematological toxicity was mild with grades 2/3 diarrhoea occurring in 4 (7%), grades 2-4 asthenia in 11 (20%) and grade 2 mucositis in 7 (13%) cycles. There was no case with more than a 10% LVEF decrease after a median of 3 (range 2-6) administered cycles/patients. One patient with breast cancer and 1 with ovarian cancer experienced a major partial response. The weekly administration of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin at the dose of 10 mg/m(2) in combination with paclitaxel at the dose of 80 mg/m(2) for 4 consecutive weeks, in cycles of 6 weeks which represent the recommended doses for further phase II studies, is a well tolerated regimen, which merits further evaluation in tumours known to be sensitive to taxanes and/or anthracyclines.     

Phase I clinical trial of bortezomib in combination with gemcitabine in patients with advanced solid tumors

BACKGROUND: Bortezomib is the first proteasome inhibitor to show preliminary evidence of activity against solid tumors. Findings from preclinical studies prompted a Phase I trial to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of bortezomib in combination with gemcitabine in patients with recurring/refractory advanced solid tumors. The effect of gemcitabine on proteasome inhibition by bortezomib in whole blood was also investigated. METHODS: Bortezomib was administered as an intravenous bolus injection on Days 1, 4, 8, and 11, with gemcitabine (30-minute infusion) on Days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. Groups of > or =3 patients were evaluated at each dose level. Escalating doses of gemcitabine 500 mg/m(2) to 1000 mg/m(2) with bortezomib 1.0 mg/m(2) to 1.5 mg/m(2) were planned. RESULTS: There were no DLTs in patients receiving bortezomib 1.0 mg/m(2) and gemcitabine 500 mg/m(2) to 1000 mg/m(2) in the first 3 dose levels. Dose-limiting nausea, vomiting, gastrointestinal obstruction, and thrombocytopenia occurred in 4 of 5 evaluable patients in dose level 4 (bortezomib 1.3 mg/m(2), gemcitabine 800 mg/m(2)), establishing bortezomib 1.0 mg/m(2) and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) as the MTD. Most common Grade > or =3 toxicities were neutropenia (6 patients), thrombocytopenia (5 patients), gastrointestinal disorders (6 patients), and general disorders (4 patients) such as fatigue. One patient with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma achieved a partial response and 7 achieved stable disease. Inhibition of 20S proteasome activity by bortezomib was unaffected by gemcitabine coadministration. CONCLUSION: Dosages of bortezomib and gemcitabine suitable for further evaluation of antitumor activity have been established.     

Concomitant weekly docetaxel,cisplatin and radiation therapy in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a dose finding study

The optimal dose of weekly docetaxel in combination with cisplatin and concomitant thoracic radiation therapy (XRT) in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is not well defined. The purpose of this study was to define the maximal tolerated dose (MTD) of docetaxel in this combination. Eligible patients had unresectable stage IIIA or IIIB NSCLC without pleural effusion. Treatment consisted of cisplatin 25 mg/m(2) plus docetaxel weekly and concomitant standard XRT for a total of 60 Gy at 200 cGy/fraction/day 5 times weekly for 6 weeks. The starting dose of docetaxel in the first cohort was 15 mg/m(2)/week. This dose was escalated by 5 mg/m(2) per cohort of 3 patients. No intrapatient dose escalation was allowed. The doses of cisplatin and XRT were not escalated. A total of 23 patients were enrolled, and 19 patients were evaluable for analysis. The first cohort (docetaxel 15 mg/m(2)/week) completed treatment without any Grade 3 or 4 toxicities. The second cohort (docetaxel 20 mg/m(2)/week) was expanded to 6 patients because of Grade 3 cough observed in 1 patient. One of 5 patients experienced Grade 3 esophagitis at the docetaxel 25 mg/m(2)/week dose level. Dose limiting toxicity consisting of Grade 3 esophagitis was reached in 4 of 5 patients receiving docetaxel at 30 mg/m(2)/week. This study determined the MTD of weekly docetaxel to be 25 mg/m(2) when combined with cisplatin 25 mg/m(2) and radiation therapy for locally advanced NSCLC. Further evaluation of this regimen in a phase II trial is underway.     

A dose-finding study of the weekly administration of paclitaxel in patients with advanced solid tumors

The purpose of this study was to determine the dose-limiting toxicities and the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of weekly administration of paclitaxel in patients with advanced solid tumors. Twenty-six patients with advanced solid tumors were treated with escalated doses of paclitaxel (starting dose 70 mg/m(2)/wk with increments of 10 mg/m(2)/wk) for 4 consecutive weeks every 6 weeks. No intrapatient escalation or growth factor support was allowed. The DLT was exceeded at the dose of 120 mg/m(2)/wk, and the dose-limiting events were grade IV neutropenia and treatment delay because of incomplete hematologic recovery. There was no cumulative myelosuppression. Grade IV neutropenia occurred in four (6%) cycles, and there was one episode of febrile neutropenia. Grade II/III fatigue occurred in 19 (73%) patients, resulting in discontinuation of treatment in 2 of them; grade II neurosensory toxicity and grade II alopecia occurred in 8 (31%) patients each. The MTD, which is also the recommended dose for further phase II studies, was 110 mg/m(2)/wk. Among the 21 patients with bidimensionally measurable disease, 2 (10%) partial responses were observed, both in patients with heavily pretreated advanced breast cancer. The weekly administration of paclitaxel for 4 consecutive weeks in cycles of 6 weeks is a feasible, safe, and active outpatient regimen that merits further evaluation in combination with other anticancer agents.     

Phase I trial of weekly paclitaxel and BMS-214662 in patients with advanced solid tumors.

PURPOSE: To assess the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), pharmacodynamics, and antitumor activity of continuous weekly-administered paclitaxel and BMS-214662, a novel farnesyl transferase inhibitor. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients were treated every week as tolerated with i.v. paclitaxel (fixed dose, 80 mg/m(2)/wk) administered over 1 h followed by i.v. BMS-214662 (escalating doses, 80-245 mg/m(2)/wk) over 1 h starting 30 min after completion of paclitaxel. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients received 94 courses (one course, 21 days) of study treatment. Two patients received five courses of BMS-214662 as a weekly 24-h infusion (209 mg/m(2)/wk). The most common toxicities were grade 1 to 2 nausea/vomiting and/or diarrhea. DLTs observed at or near the MTD (200 mg/m(2)/wk) were grade 4 febrile neutropenia with sepsis occurring on day 2 of course 1 (245 mg/m(2)/wk), reversible grade 3 to 4 serum transaminase increases on day 2, and grade 3 diarrhea (200 and 245 mg/m(2)/wk). Objective partial responses were observed in patients with pretreated head and neck, ovarian, and hormone-refractory prostate carcinomas, and leiomyosarcoma. The observed pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel and BMS-214662 imply no interaction between the two. Significant inhibition (>80%) of farnesyl transferase activity in peripheral mononuclear cells was observed at the end of BMS-214662 infusion. CONCLUSIONS: Pretreated patients with advanced malignancies can tolerate weekly paclitaxel and BMS-214662 at doses that achieve objective clinical benefit. Due to multiple DLTs occurring at the expanded MTD, the recommended phase 2 dose and schedule is paclitaxel (80 mg/m(2) over 1 h) and BMS-214662 (160 mg/m(2) over 1 h) administered weekly.     

Phase I study of fixed dose rate infusion of gemcitabine in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the feasible dose of gemcitabine when administered as a fixed dose rate infusion (10 mg/m(2)/min) on a weekly schedule to Japanese patients with unresectable advanced pancreatic cancer. METHODS: Patients were required to have histologically or cytologically proven locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer for which they had received no previous chemotherapy. Gemcitabine was administered intravenously weekly for three consecutive weeks every 4 weeks. Patients at three dose levels were scheduled to receive escalating doses of gemcitabine: 1000 mg/m(2) over 100 min (Level 1), 1200 mg/m(2) over 120 min (Level 2) and 1500 mg/m(2) over 150 min (Level 3). RESULTS: A total of 16 patients were enrolled in this study between December 2003 and September 2004. Maximum-tolerated dose was not reached during the first course. Dose-limiting toxicity was Grade 4 neutropenia. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was observed at Level 3 in all six patients in the first course, and administration of gemcitabine on Day 8 or 15 was skipped in all six patients. Non-hematologic toxicity was mild and the most common symptoms were anorexia, nausea and vomiting. Partial response was achieved in 1 of the 17 patients (7%). Median overall survival was 7.3 months. CONCLUSIONS: Gemcitabine administered at a rate of 10 mg/m(2)/min was tolerated up to 1500 mg/m(2), but 1200 mg/m(2) represented a more appropriate recommended dose in further studies owing to neutropenia in Japanese patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.     

A phase I safety, pharmacological, and biological study of the farnesyl protein transferase inhibitor, lonafarnib (SCH 663366), in combination with cisplatin and gemcitabine in patients with advanced solid tumors

PURPOSE: This phase I study was conducted to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacological properties and biological activity of the combination of the lonafarnib, a farnesylproteintransferase (FTPase) inhibitor, with gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with advanced solid malignancies. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: This was a single institution study to determine the maximal tolerated dose (MTD) of escalating lonafarnib (75-125 mg po BID) with gemcitabine (750-1,000 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, 15) and fixed cisplatin (75 mg/m(2) day 1) every 28 days. Due to dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of neutropenia and thrombocytopenia in initial patients, these patients were considered "heavily pre-treated" and the protocol was amended to limit prior therapy and re-escalate lonafarnib in "less heavily pre-treated patients" on 28-day and 21-day schedules. Cycle 1 and 2 pharmacokinetics (PK), and farnesylation of the HDJ2 chaperone protein and FPTase activity were analyzed. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients received 53 courses of therapy. Nausea, vomiting, and fatigue were frequent in all patients. Severe toxicities were observed in 91% of patients: neutropenia (41%), nausea (36%), thrombocytopenia (32%), anemia (23%) and vomiting (23%). Nine patients withdrew from the study due to toxicity. DLTs of neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and fatigue limited dose-escalation on the 28-day schedule. The MTD was established as lonafarnib 75 mg BID, gemcitabine 750 mg/m(2) days 1, 8, 15, and cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) in heavily pre-treated patients. The MTD in the less heavily pre-treated patients could not be established on the 28-day schedule as DLTs were observed at the lowest dose level, and dose escalation was not completed on the 21-day schedule due to early study termination by the Sponsor. No PK interactions were observed. FTPase inhibition was not observed at the MTD, however HDJ-2 gel shift was observed in one patient at the 100 mg BID lonafarnib dose. Anti-cancer activity was observed: four patients had stable disease lasting >2 cycles, one subject had a complete response, and another had a partial response, both with metastatic breast cancer. CONCLUSION: Lonafarnib 75 mg BID, gemcitabine 750 mg/m(2) days 1, 8, 15, and cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) day 1 on a 28-day schedule was established as the MTD. Lonafarnib did not demonstrate FTPase inhibition at these doses. Despite the observed efficacy, substantial toxicity and questionable contribution of anti-tumor activity of lonafarnib to gemcitabine and cisplatin limits further exploration of this combination.     

Hyperfractionated radiotherapy and paclitaxel for locally advanced/unresectable pancreatic cancer

PURPOSE: To determine prospectively the maximal tolerated dose and potential antitumor activity of weekly paclitaxel with concurrent hyperfractionated radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced and/or unresectable pancreatic cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We embarked on Phase I-II study of hyperfractionated radiotherapy using a concomitant in-field boost to a total dose of 63.80 Gy in 6 weeks at 1.1 Gy/fraction. Paclitaxel was administered weekly on Days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29, and 36 as a 3-h infusion. Paclitaxel doses were escalated from 20 mg/m(2)/wk to 70 mg/m(2)/wk. Twenty patients were studied, 14 women and 6 men (mean age 64 years). Some patients presented with one or more symptoms. Obstructive jaundice was the main presenting symptom in 10 patients and epigastric pain in 14. All patients had unresectable histologically proven adenocarcinoma of the pancreas (15 head, 4 body, and 1 tail). Reasons for unresectability were involvement of the portal vein, and/or superior mesenteric artery (n = 14), paraaortic nodes (n = 8), and medically inoperable (n = 1). Fourteen patients underwent a biliary bypass procedure before treatment (four endoscopic stenting, five choledochojejunostomy, and five cholecystojejunostomy). The follow-up period ranged from 14 to 66 months (median 44). RESULTS: The dose-limiting toxicity was observed at 70 mg/m(2)/wk. Grade IV Radiation Therapy Oncology Group late GI toxicity was seen in 1 patient in the form of duodenal stricture and hemorrhage. Grade II gastrointestinal adverse effects occurred in 13 patients and Grade 3 in 1 patient. No neurologic morbidity was encountered. Eight patients required cytokine support for Grade 2 and 3 neutropenia. The treatment course was delivered within the planned time in 80% of the patients. Complete relief of pain occurred in 10 of 14 patients. The CA 19-9 level was either stable or decreasing in 12 of 15 patients. Of 17 assessable patients, stable disease was seen in 10, regression in 2, a partial response in 3, and a complete response in 2. CONCLUSION: The use of hyperfractionated radiotherapy to a dose of 63.80 Gy with concomitant weekly paclitaxel is tolerated. The maximal tolerated dose of paclitaxel for this study was 60 mg/m(2)/wk. The preliminary objective responses denote activity of the regimen. We recommend testing this regimen in larger scale studies.     

Phase I trial of concurrent hyperfractionated split course radiotherapy (HFx RT), cisplatin (cDDP), and paclitaxel in patients with recurrent, previously irradiated, or treatment-naïve locally advanced upper aerodigestive malignancy

PURPOSE: Phase I study to determine the maximally tolerated dose (MTD) of cisplatin (cDDP), paclitaxel (P), and concurrent split course hyperfractionated (BID) RT in advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) and other upper aerodigestive tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eligibility stipulated ECOG performance status 0-2 and either Tx-na?ve, locally advanced, or locally recurrent, previously radiated, surgically unresectable upper aerodigestive cancer. Metastases were permitted if disease was predominantly locoregional. RT-na?ve patients received 150 cGy bid x 5 d Q 2 wks x 4. Previously radiated patients received 150 cGy bid x 5, wk 1; then 120 cGy bid x 5 Q 2 wk x 3 (later increased to 150 cGy BID for the entire treatment). Treatment fields included recurrent tumor only with 2 cm margins. Whenever possible, conventional and 3-D conformal techniques were used. Elective nodal radiation was not administered. Starting doses of cDDP and P were 12 mg/m2/d x 5 and 15 mg/m2/d x 5, respectively, Q 2 wk x 4, each given on RT days only. At dose level 2, cDDP was increased to 15 mg/m2/d x 5. At dose level 3, P was increased to 20 mg/m2/d x 5. Granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) days 6-12 (off treatment week) was added if cumulative neutropenia precipitated treatment delays. Results: Thirty-one patients (21 men, 10 women) were treated. Eight had received prior chemotherapy, 27 prior RT. At dose level three, regular treatment delays of >or=1 week due to slow neutrophil recovery occurred. Addition of G-CSF (dose level 3b) reduced treatment delays from 100 percent to 28 percent and decreased the incidence of Grade >or=2 neutropenia and mucositis. Six of 7 patients at this dose level completed all 4 cycles of treatment and all received full dose RT (60 Gy). No other dose-limiting toxicities occurred. Of 22 assessable patients with locally recurrent SCCHN, 12 (55 percent) responded. Median time to progression in this group was 6 months, with median and one-year survival of 9.5 mos and 41 percent, respectively. CONCLUSION: Concurrent daily cisplatin/paclitaxel and split course hyperfractionated RT (60 Gy) is feasible in previously radiated patients. G-CSF, administered between each cycle, reduces the incidence of treatment delays. Activity is promising and toxicity acceptable.     

A dose-escalation study of irinotecan (CPT-11) in combination with gemcitabine in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer previously treated with a cisplatin-based front line chemotherapy

PURPOSE: CPT-11 and gemcitabine are both active agents against non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We conducted a phase I study to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of their combination in patients with previously treated advanced NSCLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-seven patients with histologically confirmed NSCLC, who had failed cisplatin-based front-line chemotherapy, were enrolled. The patients' median age was 56 years, 24 were male and 22 had a performance status (WHO) 0-1. Gemcitabine was administered on days 1 and 8, as a 30-minute i.v. infusion, at escalated doses ranging from 900 to 1200 mg/m2. CPT-11 was given over a 60-minute i.v. infusion on day 8 at escalated doses ranging from 200 to 350 mg/m2, following gemcitabine administration. The treatment was repeated every three weeks. RESULTS: The MTD was exceeded at dose-level 7 with CPT-11 350 mg/m2 and gemcitabine 1200 mg/m2, where all three enrolled patients presented DLTs (one patient grade 4 thrombocytopenia, one grade 3 diarrhea and one grade 3 asthenia). The recommended doses for future phase II studies are CPT-11 300 mg/m2 on day 8 and gemcitabine 1200 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8. A total of 107 treatment cycles were administered. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was observed in 13 (13%) cycles, febrile neutropenia in 3 (3%) and grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia in 2 (2%). Grade 2/3 diarrhea was seen in 6 (6%) cycles, grade 2/3 nausea and vomiting in 13 (13%) and grade 2/3 asthenia in 8 (8%). Other toxicities were mild. Among 23 patients evaluable for response, PR was achieved in one (4.5%), SD in 12 (52.5%) and PD in 10 (43%). CONCLUSION: The results of this phase I study clearly demonstrate that gemcitabine and CPT-11 can be efficiently combined in a low-toxicity regimen with doses equal or near monotherapy levels. Further studies are needed to evaluate the efficacy of this combination in both chemotherapy-naive and pre-treated patients with advanced NSCLC.