Synchronous Colorectal Liver Metastases: Is It Time to Reconsider Traditional Paradigms of Management?

Background  Patients with synchronous colorectal liver metastases (CLM) are typically treated with initial colorectal resection followed by arbitrary and prolonged courses of chemotherapy. Partial hepatectomy is considered only for patients without interval disease progression. This review describes the rationale for this treatment approach and the recent developments suggesting that this management paradigm should be reconsidered. Results  Because asymptomatic colorectal cancer often does not lead to complications, and given the potential benefit of chemotherapy in downsizing unresectable to resectable liver disease, most patients with asymptomatic primary tumors and unresectable synchronous CLM should be first treated with chemotherapy. In contrast, initial hepatic resection should be considered for resectable synchronous CLM. Survival benefits from prehepatectomy chemotherapy have not been established. Several reports demonstrate morbidity after hepatic resection from extended durations of irinotecan- and/or oxaliplatin-based prehepatectomy chemotherapy. Although shorter treatment periods may not have these deleterious effects on subsequent hepatic resection, prospective studies reveal that most patients with supposedly aggressive disease with short treatment durations will not be identified. Moreover, a complete radiologic response to prehepatectomy chemotherapy is not only rare but also does not equate with a complete pathological response. Finally, several studies suggest that simultaneous colorectal and minor hepatic resections can performed safely with benefits in total morbidity when compared with traditional staged procedures. Conclusions   The traditional treatment paradigm centering on the utility of prehepatectomy chemotherapy for resectable synchronous CLM should be reconsidered. Recent developments underscore the need for prospective randomized controlled trials evaluating the optimal timing of hepatectomy relative to chemotherapy.     

Non-operative management of the primary tumour in patients with incurable stage IV colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND: Excision of primary colorectal cancer associated with irresectable synchronous metastases confers high morbidity and mortality with uncertain benefit. METHODS: For patients with incurable stage IV colorectal cancer, minimally symptomatic primary tumours were left in situ and 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy was administered systemically. Primary tumour-specific complications and survival were monitored. RESULTS: There were 13 men and 11 women with primary tumours in the right colon (eight), transverse colon (one), sigmoid colon (eight) or rectum (seven). Eleven patients had metastases limited to the liver (liver replacement less than 25 per cent in one, 25-50 per cent in four and more than 50 per cent in six) and 13 patients had extrahepatic disease (lung or peritoneum). Four patients with sigmoid colon tumours developed bowel obstruction, which required an uncomplicated operation in two and deployment of colonic stents in two patients, at 1, 3, 12 and 20 months from diagnosis. Three further patients underwent right hemicolectomy for abdominal pain of uncertain aetiology, with poor symptomatic relief, and another had a potentially curative operation following disease downstaging. The overall median survival was 10.3 months with a 1-year actuarial survival rate of 44 per cent. CONCLUSION: A policy to defer resection of minimally symptomatic primary colorectal cancer is associated with a low risk of complications before death from progressive systemic disease.     

结直肠癌伴不可切除的同时性肝转移的腹腔镜治疗

目的:探讨结直肠癌伴有同时性不可切除肝转移灶的腹腔镜治疗的可行性及临床应用价值。方法:回顾分析2011年6月至2012年12月31例结直肠癌伴不可切除的同时性肝转移患者的临床资料及随访结果。按原发灶手术切除方式分为两组,A组行开腹手术切除结直肠癌原发灶(n=18),B组行腹腔镜手术(n=13)。术后均采取mFOLFOX6方案化疗。对比分析两组患者手术时间、术中出血量、术后排气时间、术后住院时间、术后接受首次化疗时间及治疗效果。结果:31例均成功施行结直肠癌切除术,腹腔镜组无一例中转开腹及严重并发症发生。术后患者行mFOLFOX6方案化疗至少2个周期。经统计学分析发现,两组患者手术时间、治疗效果差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但腹腔镜组术中出血量明显减少(P<0.01),术后排气时间明显缩短(P<0.05),术后住院时间明显减少(P<0.05),术后接受首次化疗的时间明显缩短(P<0.05)。结论:对于不可切除的同时性结直肠癌肝转移患者,行腹腔镜原发肿瘤切除是安全、可行的;与开腹手术相比,腹腔镜手术治疗结直肠癌伴不可切除的同时性肝转移,在切除原发灶的手术中具有出血量少、创伤小、术后肠功能恢复快、住院时间明显缩短并促进术后早期化疗等优势。腹腔镜手术对原发肿瘤及转移灶的治疗效果与开腹手术无明显差别,具有良好的临床应用价值。     

Management of potentially resectable colorectal cancer liver metastases

Colorectal cancer is a very common malignancy worldwide and development of liver metastases,both synchronous or metachronous,is a common event.Of all patients with metastatic colorectal cancer,up to 77% have a liver-only disease and approximately 10%-20% of patients with colorectal liver metastases are considered resectable at the time of diagnosis.Surgical resection of liver metastases remains the best treatment option and it is associated with a survival plateau and a 20%-25% of long-term survivors.Perioperative chemotherapy for resectable liver metastases may improve resecability of liver metastases and disease free survival,but its impact on overall survival is still unclear and more studies are needed.Moreover,preoperative chemotherapy can increase postoperative complications.Further studies are needed to define the role of adjuvant chemotherapy after a R0 resection of liver metastases and to define the criteria for a better selection of patients candidate to hepatectomy.New strategies such as targeted therapies are emerging with promising results.Optimal management requires a multidisciplinary approach,local and systemic,but it is a still pending question.Colorectal liver metastases represent a major challenge for oncologists and surgeons.In this review will be analyzed available data about assessment and management of the patients with potentially resectable colorectal liver metastases.     

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and resection of advanced synchronous liver metastases before treatment of the colorectal primary

BACKGROUND: In many patients with advanced synchronous liver metastases from colorectal tumours, the metastases progress during treatment of the primary, precluding curative treatment. The authors have investigated a management strategy that involves high-impact chemotherapy first, resection of liver metastases second and finally removal of the primary tumour in patients with adverse prognostic factors. METHODS: Twenty consecutive patients with non-obstructive colonic (nine patients) or rectal (11 patients) cancer and advanced synchronous liver metastases were treated according to this strategy. Median age was 56 years. Patients received between two and six cycles of 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin and irinotecan-based chemotherapy. Data were collected prospectively. RESULTS: Overall survival rates at 1, 2, 3 and 4 years after the start of treatment were 85, 79, 71 and 56 per cent respectively, with a median survival of 46 months. Sixteen of the 20 patients had complete removal of liver metastases and colorectal tumours (resectability rate 80 per cent). CONCLUSION: This new strategy produced resectability and survival rates better than those expected from the published data on patients with disease of similar severity. It allows initial control and downstaging of liver metastases, and delivery of preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer without the fear that liver metastases will meanwhile progress beyond the possibility of cure.     

结直肠癌肝转移外科治疗的争议

肝脏是结直肠癌最常见的转移部位,肝转移是结直肠癌治疗失败的主要原因。外科切除在结直肠癌肝转移综合治疗模式中占据主导地位．也是患者获得治愈机会的重要手段。尽管如此,在结直肠癌肝转移外科治疗领域目前还存在很多困惑和争议．包括结直肠癌肝转移分期系统尚不完善、潜在可切除标准尚未统一、可切除肝转移灶是否需要新辅助化疗、根治切除后辅助化疗方案的选择以及不可切除肝转移灶患者无症状原发灶的处理等。本文依据近年来发表的研究资料,结合自身临床实践,剖析肝转移外科研究领域中不同的观点和依据。     

Asymptomatic Colorectal Cancer with Un-Resectable Liver Metastases: Immediate Colorectal Resection or Up-Front Systemic Chemotherapy?

Background About 20% of patients with colorectal cancer have synchronous un-resectable liver metastases. Resection of colorectal cancer in patients with moderate-severe symptoms is mandatory before starting chemotherapy. Surgical treatment of asymptomatic colorectal cancers is still a matter of discussion. Methods From January 2000 to December 2004, we prospectively collected data on 35 consecutive patients who were treated straightaway by chemotherapy without primary tumor resection. All patients underwent FOLFOX6 as first-line chemotherapy. The aim of the study was to evaluate the rate of surgical complications related to un-resected colorectal tumor. Results The mean interval between diagnosis and start of chemotherapy was 23.1 days (95% CI: 17.3–28.8). Fifteen of the 35 patients (42.9%) were down-staged to surgery; the mean interval between chemotherapy start and colon-rectum cancer resection was 6.5 months (95% CI: 5.5–7.5). None of them developed complications related to the primary tumor during chemotherapy. Of the other 20 patients who did not undergo any curative surgery, 16 received a second line chemotherapy and 10 a third line: six patients are alive and without intestinal symptoms (mean follow up 22.5 months, 95% CI: 11.2–33.9). Only one patient (2.8%) developed clinical signs of intestinal occlusion 5.6 months from the start of chemotherapy and required urgent colostomy. Conclusions The rate of complications related to the non-resected colorectal tumor is very low using oxaliplatin as first line chemotherapy. Non-operative management of asymptomatic colorectal cancers with un-resectable liver metastases is a safe approach.     

Additive Chemotherapie bei Lebermalignomen zur Verbesserung der Operabilität

Complete tumor resection is the only curative option for patients with colorectal liver metastases. Hepatic resection is frequently not possible for technical reasons: because of large tumors, multiple or bilateral metastases, or tumors that are too close to vessels. In these cases chemotherapy might downstage the tumor volume and facilitate secondary curative resection in patients initially not eligible for curative surgery. Treatment with fluorouracil (5-Fu) alone has resulted in disappointing response rates of about 10-20% in patients with colorectal liver metastases, which make these protocols useless in the neoadjuvant setting. Because regional chemotherapy into the hepatic arteria results in significantly higher response rates (40-50%), some studies have documented some success in secondary curative surgery after regional chemotherapy of initially unresectable colorectal liver metastases. However, regional chemotherapy is invasive and therefore not standard therapy for every patient with colorectal liver metastases. Recently new exciting treatment options have become available for colorectal cancer. Combinations of chemotherapy consisting of irinotecan and 5-Fu/FA or oxaliplatin and 5-Fu/FA result in response rates of 50% and can be considered a new standard first-line chemotherapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Recently, two encouraging retrospective studies have been published with chronomodulated chemotherapy of oxaliplatin and 5-Fu/FA in the setting of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with unresectable colorectal liver metastases. With this multidisciplinary approach, antitumor activity of chemotherapy appears to be translated into a long-term survival benefit and some patients with initially unresectable colorectal liver metastases can potentially be cured. As a consequence, on the premises of close cooperation between surgeons and internists, more patients with metastatic colorectal cancer will be cured in the future.     

Coexistence of colonic carcinoma, renal cell carcinoma and gastrointestinal stromal tumour-A case report

The occurrence of synchronous primary neoplasms remains an issue of great interest to surgeons and oncologists in particular, and the medical field in general. The question of common genetic pathways in the pathogenesis of such neoplasms is always raised when such associations are seen-whether metachronously or synchronously. The possibility of the coexistence of multiple tumours in the same patient must be taken into consideration when preparing patients for operation and a thorough search of the intraperitoneal organs for such coexistence remains important.A case of synchronously resected caecal carcinoma, jejunal gastrointestinal stromal tumour and renal cell carcinoma is presented here, along with a literature review on synchronous tumour resection.     

Treatment strategy for patients with colorectal cancer and synchronous irresectable liver metastases

BACKGROUND: The aim of this case-matched study was to determine the best treatment strategy for patients with asymptomatic colorectal cancer and irresectable synchronous liver metastases. METHODS: Between 1997 and 2002, 27 patients with asymptomatic colorectal cancer and irresectable synchronous liver metastases were treated by chemotherapy without initial primary resection (chemotherapy group). These 27 patients were compared with 32 patients matched for age, sex, performance status, primary tumour location, number of liver metastases, nature of irresectable disease and type of chemotherapy, but who were treated initially by resection of primary tumour (resection group). RESULTS: The 2-year actuarial survival rate was 41 per cent in the chemotherapy group and 44 per cent in the resection group (P = 0.753). In the latter group, the mortality and morbidity rates for primary resection were 0 and 19 per cent (six of 32 patients) respectively. In the chemotherapy group, intestinal obstruction related to the primary tumour occurred in four of 27 patients. The mean overall hospital stay was 11 days in the chemotherapy group and 22 days in the resection group (P = 0.003). CONCLUSION: Systemic chemotherapy without resection of the bowel cancer is the option of choice because, for most patients, it is associated with a shorter hospital stay and avoids surgery without a detrimental effect on survival.     

OncoSurge: a strategy for long‐term survival in metastatic colorectal cancer

OncoSurge is a combined modality strategy for the management of colorectal cancer with hepatic metastases. It has emerged as a result of new and expanded patient selection criteria for resectability of metastases, coupled with more effective neoadjuvant and postoperative chemotherapy. By bringing together these developments in surgery and medical oncology, the new approach promises to increase significantly the resectability rate and long‐term survival in colorectal cancer patients with liver metastases. Surgery for colorectal liver metastases should now be considered across a range of clinical circumstances that would historically have been contraindications to resection. These contraindications include multiple or bilobar metastases, large tumour size, a Dukes stage C or poorly differentiated primary tumour, synchronous detection of metastases with the primary tumour, disease in elderly patients, or a resection margin of less than 1 cm. None of these criteria should necessarily exclude a patient from resection, because although they may be associated with a less favourable prognosis they do not exclude the possibility of long‐term survival. Non‐resectable extrahepatic disease and portal lymph node involvement, however, remain contraindications to resection in most circumstances. Retrospective studies of neoadjuvant therapy have indicated that a regimen based on low dose oxaliplatin, 5‐fluorourucil (5‐FU) and leucovorin increased the overall resectability rate of patients presenting with hepatic colorectal metastases from 20% to 30%, with 13.6% of patients with unresectable metastases becoming eligible for curative resection. More recently, studies using more potent oxaliplatin‐based regimens have reported significantly higher resectability rates of at least 40%, with 5‐year survival of 50% reported in one large study among patients whose liver metastases were resected after initial neoadjuvant therapy for unresectable tumours. Following resection, postoperative therapy based on a combination of hepatic artery infusion (HAI) and systemic chemotherapy reduces hepatic recurrence and increases survival, but more potent systemic therapy is required to reduce the rate of extrahepatic recurrence. Studies are now in progress combining HAI with oxaliplatin‐based systemic therapy to address this issue. By combining a more inclusive approach to surgery with more effective neoadjuvant and postoperative chemotherapy, the OncoSurge treatment model is likely to increase significantly the number of patients with hepatic colorectal metastases who can be treated with curative intent, and thus has the potential to improve overall patient survival.     

A population-based study of the incidence, management and prognosis of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND: The aim of this population-based study was to evaluate the incidence, management and prognosis of patients with hepatic metastases related to colorectal cancer using data from the Digestive Cancer Registry of Calvados, France. METHODS: Of 1325 patients with colorectal cancer registered between January 1994 and December 1999, 358 developed hepatic metastases. Logistic regression was used to analyse prognostic factors. Survival analysis was carried out with Cox's proportional hazards model. RESULTS: Some 18.8 per cent of patients had synchronous metastases, while 29.3 per cent developed metastases at 3 years. Of patients with hepatic metastases, 17.3 per cent had a surgical resection, 40.2 per cent were treated with palliative chemotherapy and 42.5 per cent had symptomatic treatment. Factors associated with receiving symptomatic treatment only were age over 75 years and more than one metastasis, but not place of treatment. Median survival after a diagnosis of hepatic metastases was 10.7 (range 4.6-23.1) months. Significant adverse prognostic factors were: age over 75 years (P = 0.001), lymph node invasion of primary tumour (P = 0.024), bilateral distribution of metastases (P = 0.001), other metastases (P = 0.004) and symptomatic treatment only (P = 0.041). CONCLUSION: Despite improvement in treatment for hepatic metastases, age and extent of disease remain limiting factors for surgical resection and palliative chemotherapy.     

Australian contemporary management of synchronous metastatic colorectal cancer

Introduction

This article outlines the current Australian multidisciplinary treatment of synchronous metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma and assesses the factors that influence patient outcome.

Methods

This is a retrospective analysis of the prospective ‘Treatment of Recurrent and Advanced Colorectal Cancer’ registry, describing the patient treatment pathway and documenting the extent of disease, resection of the colorectal primary and metastases, chemotherapy and biological therapy use. Cox regression models for progression‐free and overall survival were constructed with a comprehensive set of clinical variables. Analysis was intentionn‐ton‐treat, quantifying the effect of treatment intent decided at the multidisciplinary team meeting (MDT).

Results

One thousand one hundred and nine patients presented with synchronous metastatic disease between July 2009 and November 2015. Median follow‐up was 15.8 months; 4.4% (group 1) had already curative resections of primary and metastases prior to MDT, 22.2% (group 2) were considered curative but were referred to MDT for opinion and/or medical oncology treatment prior to resection and 70.2% were considered palliative at MDT (group 3). Overall, 83% received chemotherapy, 55% had their primary resected and 23% had their metastases resected; 13% of resections were synchronous, 20% were staged with primary resected first and 62% had only the colorectal primary managed surgically. Performance status, metastasis resection (R0 versus R1 versus R2 versus no resection), resection of the colorectal primary and treatment intent determined at MDT were the most significant factors for progression‐free and overall survival.

Conclusions

This is the largest Australian series of synchronous metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma and offers insight into the nature and utility of contemporary practice.     

Hepatic colorectal metastases: methods of improving resectability

Surgery is the best treatment modality for colorectal liver metastases. When initially unresectable, hepatic resection of metastases after downstaging by chemotherapy can provide a hope of long-term survival similar to that of primarily resected patients. Definitions of resectability have evolved with the emerging principle that if metastases can be completely resected regardless of their size and number,resection should be performed as the sole mean of achieving long-term survival.Specific surgical techniques can be combined to improve resectability. If the tumor is considered unresectable, recent developments make possible to render some tumors surgically resectable. Depending on the tumor size, number and location, neoadjuvant treatments, mainly chemotherapy, can be used, followed by resection. Resection may be contraindicated if the residual volume of liver is inadequate to avoid liver failure. This may be changed either by PVE or two-stage hepatectomy, both of which use the natural regenerative capacity of the liver. Local destructive therapies such as cryosurgery and radio-frequency can also be used in conjunction with resection for patients in whom all metastases are not surgically resectable. The present use of these ablative techniques is improving the percentages of unresectable patients considered for surgery. All of the above-described methods can be combined to achieve a surgical strategy that is as curative as possible, increasing the number of patients primarily unresectable, with a long-term survival hope similar to that of primarily resectable patients. To achieve this objective, a close collaboration between oncologists, radiologists, and surgeons is mandatory, with routine re-evaluation of patients for an adequate timing of each treatment.     

Orthotopic liver transplantation for unresectable hepatoblastoma

BACKGROUND: The outcome of treatment for advanced hepatoblastoma has recently improved after the introduction of preoperative or pre- and postoperative cisplatin-containing chemotherapy combined with complete surgical excision. The role of liver transplantation in a population of patients who have received this regimen has not been clearly defined. METHODS: Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) was performed in 13 children, aged 5 months to 11 years (median 27 months), who were assessed with unresectable hepatoblastoma, and whose pretreatment extent-of-disease was based on radiologic findings of group III (n=11) and group IV (n=2). One child with a multifocal tumor showed pulmonary metastases at presentation, but, according to radiologic studies, the deposits resolved with chemotherapy before liver transplantation. One other child showed exophytic extension of the primary tumor infiltrating the porta hepatis and body of the pancreas. All 13 patients received preoperative chemotherapy to reduce the size of the primary tumor(s) and to treat metastatic spread. RESULTS: Twelve children underwent elective OLT; all are alive and show normal graft function at a mean follow-up of 33 months (range 1-108). One child shows evidence of recurrent disease in the form of pulmonary metastases. One child underwent emergency OLT for acute liver failure after (incomplete) extended right hepatectomy and died from respiratory failure, with no evidence of recurrent tumor 3 weeks posttransplant. CONCLUSIONS: Liver transplantation is an effective treatment for unresectable unifocal or multifocal hepatoblastoma confined to the liver. A multidisciplinary approach to the management of hepatoblastoma, with thoughtful collaboration between pediatric oncologists, hepatologists, and liver surgeons, is essential.     

Diagnosis and treatment of colorectal liver metastases - workflow

In this review, standards of diagnosis and treatment of colorectal liver metastases are described on the basis of a workshop discussion. Algorithms of care for patients with synchronous / metachronous colorectal liver metastases or locoregional recurrent tumour are presented. Surgical resection is the procedure of choice in the curative treatment of liver metastases. The decision about the resection of liver metastases should consider the following parameters: 1. General operability of the patient (comorbidity); 2. Achievability of an R 0 situation: i. if necessary, in combination with ablative methods, ii. if necessary, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, iii. the ability to eradicate extrahepatic tumour manifestations; 3. Sufficient volume of the liver remaining after resection ("future liver remnant = FLR): i. if necessary, in combination with portal vein embolisation or two-stage hepatectomy; 4. The feasibility to preserve two contiguous hepatic segments with adequate vascular inflow and outflow as well as biliary drainage; 5. Tumour biological aspects ("prognostic variables"); 6. Experience of the surgeon and centre! Extrahepatic disease does not contraindicate hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases provided a complete resection of both intra- and extrahepatic disease is feasible. Even in bilobar colorectal metastases and 5 or more tumours in the liver, a complete tumour resection has been described. The type of resection (hepatic wedge resection or anatomic resection) does not influence the recurrence rate. Preoperative volumetry is indicated when major hepatic resection is planned. The FLR should be 25 % in patients with normal liver, 40 % in patients who have received intensive chemotherapy or in cases of fatty liver, liver fibrosis or diabetes, and 50-60 % in patients with cirrhosis. In patients with initially unresectable colorectal liver metastases, preoperative chemotherapy enables complete resection in 15-30 % of the cases, whereas the value of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with resectable liver metastases has not been sufficiently supported. In situ ablative procedures (radiofrequency ablation = RFA and laser-induced interstitial thermotherapy = LITT) are local therapy options in selected patients who are not candidates for resection (central recurrent liver metastases, bilobar multiple metastases and high-risk resection or restricted patient operability). Patients with tumours larger than 3 cm have a high local recurrence rate after percutaneous RFA and are not optimal candidates for this procedure. The physician's experience influences the results significantly, both after hepatectomy and after in situ ablation. Therefore, patients with colorectal liver metastases should be treated in centres with experience in liver surgery.     

��ֱ������ת��ͬ���г���Ӧ֤������֢����

结直肠癌肝转移手术策略的选择是结直肠癌治疗的热点和难点之一。同期肝切除手术因其具有避免多次手术打击、不会中断连续的系统化疗等优点,受到越来越多学者的青睐。对于一般状况较好,原发灶可切除,肝转移灶小且多位于周边或局限于半肝,肝切除范围较小时,肝外转移可切除的病人,可考虑同期肝切除手术。认真进行术前评估,严格筛选合适病例,提高手术操作水平并加强围术期管理有助于减少并发症的发生,改善病人预后。     

Treatment of Colorectal Cancer with Unresectable Synchronous Liver-Only Metastases with Combined Therapeutic Modalities

Background  

Resection + radiofrequency ablation (RFA) + hepatic artery infusion (HAI) + systemic chemotherapy for patients with unresectable synchronous liver-only metastases from colorectal cancer was rarely used previously.     

Is Surgery Indicated for Patients with Symptomatic Nonfunctioning Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor and Unresectable Hepatic Metastases?

Background Patients with advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor, even in the presence of unresectable hepatic metastases, have survival usually measured in years than in months. Theoretically, we would have reason to resect symptomatic primary pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors from these patients palliatively. However, the effect and feasibility of removing symptomatic primary pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor in patients with unresectable hepatic metastases has never been addressed. Methods In 2000, we instituted a prospective study to resect symptomatic primary tumors and treat unresectable hepatic metastases by lanreotide and hepatic artery embolization in patients with definite tissue proof of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor. Results Thirteen patients were included in this study; seven patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy, and six underwent distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy. There were no operative deaths. Eight of thirteen patients had no radiologic evidence of disease progression. The other five patients had disease progression by their 6-month follow-up; they underwent hepatic artery chemoembolization or chemotherapy. One patient died of multiple lung and bone metastases 80 months after operation, and one patient died of continuous progression of liver metastases 18 months after operation. Telephone interviews of 11 patients who survived revealed that 10 reported improved quality of life after resection of symptomatic primary pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor and one patient reported no change. Conclusions We suggest that symptomatic primary pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors should be resected even when unresectable hepatic metastases are found at diagnosis because of the relatively low risk of pancreatic surgery, effective elimination of symptoms caused by primary tumors, and slow progression of hepatic metastases under lanreotide and hepatic artery embolization.     

�����г���ֱ������ת�Ʋ���ԭ����Ĵ���

结直肠癌肝转移发生率高,且临床就诊者大多数肝转移灶为不可切除。尽管关于不可切除结直肠癌肝转移病人原发灶的处理尚有一定争议,但随着结直肠癌原发灶处理经验的积累,多学科综合治疗团队(MDT)模式的开展,转化性治疗思维的应用,"个体化治疗"原则的实施,针对不可切除结直肠癌肝转移病人原发灶的处理逐步形成包括手术切除原发灶在内较合理的综合治疗体系。手术切除、新辅助治疗与姑息治疗的合理选择是改善不可切除结直肠癌肝转移病人生存质量及提高生存期,获得最佳治疗效果的关键。