Reproducibility and inter-reader agreement of a scoring system for ultrasound evaluation of hip osteoarthritis

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the intra-reader and inter-reader agreements of ultrasonographic assessments of hip joints in patients with hip osteoarthritis. DESIGN: Ultrasonography was performed on 100 patients with hip osteoarthritis at 14 MHz using a 8-15 MHz linear probe. Dynamic sweeps of the hip and representative still images were used for the analysis. A semiquantitative grading score was introduced in the evaluation of the ultrasound pictures and compared with an overall ultrasound evaluation. The evaluation was performed by a specialist in ultrasonography and a rheumatologist trained in musculoskeletal ultrasound examination. Clinical pain assessment and joint aspiration were obtained in parallel with the ultrasonography. RESULTS: Intraobserver agreement represented by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) (exact agreement in percentage; unweighted kappa values) showed good to excellent correlation, 0.8 with regard to the osteophyte score, 0.78 with regard to the femoral head score, 0.71 with regard to the fluid score and 0.69 with regard to the synovial profile score. Interobserver agreement was fair to good with corresponding ICC 0.65, 0.63, 0.45 and 0.6, respectively. In comparison, the ICC for the global osteoarthritis and synovial assessments were 0.7 and 0.72, respectively, for the intraobserver rating and 0.56 and 0.58, respectively, for the interobserver rating. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that ultrasound is a reproducible method for the assessment of changes in the osseous surface and synovium-related inflammation. The semiquantitative scoring system presented seemed to match the global assessment of a trained ultrasound investigator and might be used by less-trained investigators.     

Inter- and intra-observer agreement of high-resolution ultrasonography and power Doppler in assessment of joint inflammation and bone erosions in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

To assess the inter- and intra-observer reproducibility of musculoskeletal ultrasonography among rheumatologist in detecting inflammatory and morphostructural changes in small joints of the hands in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Five members of the “Escuela de Ecografía del Colegio Mexicano de Reumatología” tested their inter- and intra-observer reliabilities in the assessment of basic sonographic findings of joint inflammation and bone erosion. Their results were compared to those obtained by a group of international experts from European League Against Rheumatism. A clinical rheumatologist evaluated eight RA patients. Five Siemens Acuson Antares ultrasound machines (7–13 MHz linear probes) were used. The OMERACT preliminary definitions of joint effusion, synovial hypertrophy, bone erosions and tenosynovitis were adopted. Inter-observer and intra-observer agreement was calculated by overall agreement and kappa statistics. Mean kappa value for joint effusion was good, 0.654 (85%); synovial hypertrophy, 0.550 (77.2%); power Doppler signal, 0.550 (82.5%); bone erosions, 0.549 (81%); and tenosynovitis, 0.500 (91.5%). Mean and overall intra-observer agreement for semiquantitative score was good for joint effusion, 0.630 (77.2%) and bone erosions, 0.605 (56.25%); and moderate to synovial hypertrophy, 0.476 (65%) and power Doppler signal, 0.471 (80%). Mean kappa value for joint effusion was 0.381 (95%), synovial hypertrophy, 0.447 (72%); power Doppler signal, 0.496 (81%); bone erosions, 0.294 (81%); and tenosynovitis, 0.030 (66%). Mean and overall inter-observer agreement for semiquantitative score was poor for joint effusion, 0.325 (57%) and bone erosions, 0.360 (43%); and moderate to synovial hypertrophy, 0.431 (55%) and power Doppler signal, 0.496 (81%). Intra-observer variability reached the highest levels of agreement. Factors related to the experience of the rheumatologist, the time spent in each examination and knowledge of the software ultrasound equipment could influence the lower level of inter-observer agreement in this study.     

Elucidation of the relationship between synovitis and bone damage: a randomized magnetic resonance imaging study of individual joints in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVE: To simultaneously image bone and synovium in the individual joints characteristically involved in early rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Forty patients with early, untreated RA underwent gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the second through fifth metacarpophalangeal joints of the dominant hand at presentation, 3 months, and 12 months. In the first phase (0-3 months), patients were randomized to receive either methotrexate alone (MTX) or MTX and intraarticular corticosteroids (MTX + IAST) into all joints with clinically active RA. The MTX-alone group received no further corticosteroids until the second phase (3-12 months), when both groups received standard therapy. RESULTS: In the first phase, MTX + IAST reduced synovitis scores more than MTX alone. There were significantly fewer joints with new erosions on MRI in the former group compared with the latter. During the second phase, the synovitis scores were equivalent and a similar number of joints in each group showed new erosions on MRI. In both phases, there was a close correlation between the degree of synovitis and the number of new erosions, with the area under the curve for MRI synovitis the only significant predictor of bone damage progression. In individual joints, there was a threshold effect on new bone damage related to the level of synovitis; no erosions occurred in joints without synovitis. CONCLUSION: In early RA, synovitis appears to be the primary abnormality, and bone damage occurs in proportion to the level of synovitis but not in its absence. In the treatment of patients with RA, outcome measures and therapies should focus on synovitis.     

The OMERACT ultrasound task force--status and perspectives

This article reports the most recent work of the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) Ultrasound Task Force, and highlights the future research priorities discussed at the OMERACT 10 meeting. Results of the following studies were presented: (1) intra- and interobserver reliability of ultrasound detecting and scoring synovitis in different joints of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA); (2) systematic review of previous ultrasound scoring systems of synovitis in RA; (3) enthesitis systematic review and Delphi definition exercise in spondyloarthritis enthesitis; (4) enthesitis intra- and interobserver reliability exercise; and (5) Delphi definition exercise in hand osteoarthritis, and reliability exercises. Study conclusions were discussed, and a future research agenda was approved, notably further validation of an OMERACT ultrasound global synovitis score (GLOSS) in RA, emphasizing the importance of testing feasibility, predictive value, and added value over standard clinical variables. Future research areas will include validating scoring systems for enthesitis and osteoarthritis, and testing the metric qualities of ultrasound for evaluating tenosynovitis and structural damage in RA.     

Imaging in rheumatoid arthritis--why MRI and ultrasonography can no longer be ignored

Implementing the modern treatment strategy in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), i.e. early initiation and optimal adjustments of aggressive therapies, requires methods for early diagnosis and sensitive monitoring of the disease process. In rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials and routine management, conventional radiography is the pivotal method for diagnosing and monitoring structural joint damage. However, it is insensitive to bone damage at its earliest stages and totally incapable of capturing the primary feature of rheumatoid disease, the synovitis. In comparison with radiography, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) offers assessment of bone damage with improved sensitivities to early pathology and to change. In addition, detailed assessment of soft tissue changes, including synovitis and tenosynovitis, is possible and MRI findings are of prognostic value for the long-term radiological outcome. Ultrasonography (US) is less validated than MRI, but available data suggests that US offers comparable information on both inflammatory and destructive changes in RA finger and toe joints. Issues of reliability, standardization and documentation limit its value in clinical trials, This article reviews current knowledge on conventional radiography, computed tomography, MRI and US for assessment of peripheral joints in RA. The rationale is provided for MRI being the new gold standard for assessment of RA joints and US becoming a routine bedside tool for improved joint assessments and injections by rheumatologists. Pursuing the goal of improving patient care and disease outcome, rheumatologists can no longer afford to ignore MRI and US as means to measure disease activity and joint damage in rheumatoid arthritis.     

Prospective 7 year follow up imaging study comparing radiography, ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance imaging in rheumatoid arthritis finger joints

OBJECTIVE: To perform a prospective long term follow up study comparing conventional radiography (CR), ultrasonography (US), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the detection of bone erosions and synovitis in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) finger joints. METHODS: The metacarpophalangeal and proximal interphalangeal joints II-V (128 joints) of the clinically dominant hand of 16 patients with RA were included. Follow up joint by joint comparisons for erosions and synovitis were made. RESULTS: At baseline, CR detected erosions in 5/128 (4%) of all joints, US in 12/128 (9%), and MRI in 34/128 (27%). Seven years later, an increase of joints with erosions was found with CR (26%), US (49%) (p<0.001 each), and MRI (32%, NS). In contrast, joint swelling and tenderness assessed by clinical examination were decreased at follow up (p = 0.2, p<0.001). A significant reduction in synovitis with US and MRI (p<0.001 each) was seen. In CR, 12 patients did not have any erosions at baseline, while in 10/12 patients erosions were detected in 25/96 (26%) joints after 7 years. US initially detected erosions in 9 joints, of which two of these joints with erosions were seen by CR at follow up. MRI initially found 34 erosions, of which 14 (41%) were then detected by CR. CONCLUSION: After 7 years, an increase of bone erosions was detected by all imaging modalities. In contrast, clinical improvement and regression of synovitis were seen only with US and MRI. More than one third of erosions previously detected by MRI were seen by CR 7 years later.     

Role of metacarpophalangeal joint anatomic factors in the distribution of synovitis and bone erosion in early rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the role of metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint anatomic and biomechanical factors in the distribution of synovitis and bone erosion in early rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Thirty-three patients with early RA with clinically diagnosed MCP joint disease and 28 healthy controls were examined by magnetic resonance imaging of the second to fifth MCP joints of the dominant hand. T1 and T2 fat-suppressed coronal sequences were obtained to assess erosion, and dynamic contrast-enhanced images were acquired to assess synovitis in all of the RA patients and in 8 of the controls. Erosions were defined as bone defects with sharp margins observed using T1-weighted imaging in 2 planes, with a cortical break seen in at least 1 plane. The location of erosions was recorded. The volume of synovitis surrounding each MCP joint (divided into 8 regions) was calculated by summation of voxels derived from the maximal enhancement parameters. The synovial volumes adjacent to MCP joint collateral ligaments were determined by correcting synovial volumes for the positions of asymmetrically placed flexor tendons. RESULTS: In patients with early RA in whom bone erosions were present, there was a propensity for involvement of the radial side of the second (P < 0.0001), third (P = 0.002), and fourth (P = 0.056) MCP joints, but not the fifth. Fifty-two of the 110 erosions (47.3%) occurred adjacent to the radial collateral ligaments of the second, third, and fourth MCP joints. The volume of synovitis was also greater on the radial side of the second (P < 0.0001) and third (P < 0.001) MCP joints. A predilection for synovitis in all of the MCP joints adjacent to the radial collateral ligaments was evident when the positional effects of the flexor tendon were considered. The position of radial collateral ligaments had an effect on erosion formation that was independent of synovitis. A predilection for radial bone damage was also evident in the controls, although lesions were 5-fold less frequent, were generally smaller, and had well-defined margins. CONCLUSION: This study shows that there is a predilection for both synovitis and bone erosion formation on the radial side of the MCP joints in early RA, and that joint inflammation appears to drive the inherent tendency for bone damage on the radial side of joints. These findings have implications regarding the pathogenesis of joint damage in RA.     

Short-term outcome of finger joint synovectomy in rheumatoid arthritis

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) frequently affects finger joints, and persistent synovitis is believed to cause not only bone destruction but also various deformities of the fingers in the long run. Synovectomy of the finger joints is carried out when chronic swelling of the synovium does not respond to any conservative treatment with medication and rehabilitation. In the present study the short-term results of finger joint synovectomy in RA were reviewed in 49 finger joints. The subjects were evaluated at two time points, with average follow-up periods of 14 and 62 months, and the results were compared between the two follow-up time points. In regard to results, pain relief, swelling abatement, and only a little loss of motion were observed in most fingers. Moreover, only a few patients demonstrated progression of bone destruction, suggesting that synovectomy has a retarding effect and tends to be effective especially in the early stages of the disease. In conclusion, we recommend synovectomy for finger joints in RA patients before bone changes occur, and when chronic synovitis of the finger joints does not respond to any other conservative treatment.     

A novel ultrasonographic synovitis scoring system suitable for analyzing finger joint inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVE: To develop an ultrasonographic (US) synovitis scoring system suitable for evaluation of finger joint inflammation in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and to compare semiquantitative US scoring with quantitative US measurements. METHODS: US was performed at the palmar and dorsal sides of the second through fifth metacarpophalangeal (MCP) and proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints in 10 healthy subjects and in the clinically more affected hand in 46 RA patients. Ten patients additionally underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Synovitis was measured, standardized, and scored according to a semiquantitative method. The 2 methods (semiquantitative US scoring, quantitative US) were compared and statistical cutoffs were identified using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. MRI results were compared with semiquantitative US scoring and quantitative US results. The optimal US scoring method from 6 joint combinations was identified (ROC curve analysis). RESULTS: Synovitis was most frequently detected in the palmar proximal area (86% of affected joints). We found no significant differences between individual PIP joints or between individual MCP joints, indicating that all fingers within each of these joint groups should be treated equally for statistical calculations, although each joint group as a whole should be treated separately. The optimal cutoff point to distinguish between "health" and "pathology" was 0.6 mm both for MCP joints (sensitivity 94%, specificity 89%) and for PIP joints (sensitivity 90%, specificity 88%). There was no significant difference between semiquantitative US scores and quantitative US measurements. The best results for joint combinations were achieved using the "sum of 4 fingers" (second through fifth MCP and PIP joints) and "sum of 3 fingers" (second through fourth MCP and PIP joints) methods. Comparison of MRI results with semiquantitative US scores revealed high concordance. CONCLUSION: US evaluation of finger joint synovitis can be considerably simplified by focusing on the palmar side and by applying semiquantitative grading instead of quantitative measurements. For evaluation of treatment efficacy based on synovitis in RA patients, we recommend using the "sum of 3 fingers" method in longitudinal trials.     

Evidence for a different anatomic basis for joint disease localization in polymyalgia rheumatica in comparison with rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVE: The anatomic basis for joint disease localization in polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) is poorly understood. This study used contrast-enhanced and fat suppression magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to evaluate the relationship between synovial and extracapsular inflammation in PMR and early rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Ten patients with new-onset PMR and 10 patients with early RA underwent dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and conventional MRI of affected metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints. Synovitis and tenosynovitis were calculated based on the number of enhancing voxels, initial rate of enhancement, and maximal enhancement of gadolinium diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (Gd-DTPA). Periarticular bone erosion and bone edema were scored according to the OMERACT (Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Clinical Trials) scoring system in both groups. The degree of extracapsular Gd-DTPA enhancement was assessed in both conditions using semiquantitative scoring. RESULTS: No significant differences were seen in the volume of synovitis (P = 0.294), degree of flexor tenosynovitis (P = 0.532), periarticular erosions (P = 0.579), or degree of bone edema (P = 0.143) between RA and PMR joints. However, despite comparable degrees of synovitis, the proportion of MCP joints showing extracapsular enhancement was higher in the PMR group (100%) than in the RA group (50%) (P = 0.030). One PMR patient, but none of the RA patients, had bone edema at the capsular insertion. CONCLUSION: Despite degrees of synovitis and tenosynovitis comparable with those in RA, PMR-related hand disease is associated with prominent extracapsular changes, suggesting that inflammation in these tissues is more prominent than joint synovitis, which is common in both conditions. This suggests that the anatomic basis for joint disease localization differs between RA and PMR.     

Low field dedicated magnetic resonance imaging in untreated rheumatoid arthritis of recent onset

OBJECTIVE: To compare a low field dedicated extremity magnetic resonance imaging system (E-MRI) with x ray and clinical examination, in the detection of inflammation and erosive lesions in wrist and metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints in newly diagnosed, untreated rheumatoid arthritis (RA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty five patients (disease duration < or =1 year) and three healthy controls entered the study. An x ray examination and MRI (before and after intravenous injection of a contrast agent) of the 2nd-5th MCP joints and the wrist was performed. The number of erosions on x ray examination and MRI was calculated, and synovitis in the MCP joints and wrists was graded semiquantitatively. RESULTS: E-MRI detected 57 bone erosions, whereas only six erosions were disclosed by x ray examination (ratio 9.5:1). Synovial hypertrophy grades were significantly higher in RA joints with clinical signs of joint inflammation-that is, swelling and/or tenderness (median 3, 5th-95th centile 1-4) than without these clinical signs (median 2, 5th-95th centile 1-3), p < 0.001. 51% of the joints without clinical signs of synovitis showed synovial hypertrophy on E-MRI. There was a positive correlation between MRI scores of synovitis and the number of erosions detected by MRI in the MCP joints (Spearman r(s) = 0.31, p < 0.01). No healthy controls had erosions or synovitis on MRI. CONCLUSION: Joint destruction starts very early in RA and E-MRI allows detailed evaluation of inflammatory and destructive changes in wrists and MCP joints in patients with incipient RA.     

Reliability of the novel 7‐joint ultrasound score: Results from an inter‐ and intraobserver study performed by rheumatologists

Objective

To assess the inter‐ and intraobserver reliability of 26 rheumatologists when performing the 7‐joint ultrasound score (US7).

Methods

Six patients with rheumatoid arthritis were examined by 26 sonographers in 12 rater groups who performed the US7 score. The US7 score includes the clinically dominant wrist, the second and third metacarpophalangeal (MCP) and proximal interphalangeal joints, and the second and fifth metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joints, which were evaluated for synovitis, tenosynovitis/paratenonitis, and erosions from the dorsal side and palmar/plantar aspects by gray‐scale and power Doppler (PD) ultrasound. Additional lateral scans were performed at the MCP2 and MTP5 joints. All of the groups repeated the examination in 4 patients in order to calculate the intraobserver reliability. The results of one group that included 2 expert sonographers were considered as the reference standard. Kappa values, median agreement rates (interobserver), and P values (intraobserver evaluation) were calculated.

Results

The median overall kappa value for detecting synovitis was 0.51, for tenosynovitis/paratenonitis was 0.57, and for erosions was 0.45. In detail, the best interobserver results were found for the detection of erosions in the MTP2 joint from the plantar aspect (κ = 1; median agreement rate 89.4%) and for PD signal detection in the palmar wrist region (κ = 0.79; median agreement rate 78.8%). Good agreement was found for detecting erosions in the MCP2 joint from the radial side (κ = 0.67; median agreement rate 77.3%).

Conclusion

The inter‐ and intraobserver reliability of the US7 score shows moderate to substantial kappa values and good agreements. Therefore, this ultrasound score has the potential to be an important imaging tool, including multicenter analysis to assess structural changes.     

Ultrasonographic assessment of inflammatory activity in rheumatoid arthritis: comparison of extended versus reduced joint evaluation

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the validity of reduced joint counts for ultrasonographic (US) assessment of joint inflammatory activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Ninety-four patients with RA were included. C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) levels were recorded for each patient. The presence of tenderness, swelling and a subjective swelling score from 0 to 3 were assessed by two rheumatologists who reached consensus in 60 joints examined in each patient. All patients underwent an US examination by a third blinded rheumatologist, using power Doppler (PD). US joint effusion, synovitis and PD signal were graded from 0 to 3 in the 60 joints. A 60-joint count and index for effusion, synovitis and PD signal were recorded. A 6-, 10-, 16-, 18-, and two 12-joint counts and indices for US parameters that included the most frequently US involved joints were calculated for each patient. RESULTS: A 12-joint assessment for effusion, synovitis and PD signal, including bilateral wrist, second and third MCP, second and third PIP of hands and knee joints highly correlated with corresponding 60-joint US counts and indices. This reduced-joint US evaluation showed a similar correlation with clinical and laboratory parameters of disease activity to corresponding 60-joint assessment. CONCLUSION: We propose that a 12-joint evaluation may be a useful tool for US assessment of overall joint inflammatory activity in RA.     

Interobserver reliability of rheumatologists performing musculoskeletal ultrasonography: results from a EULAR "Train the trainers" course

Objective: To evaluate the interobserver reliability among 14 experts in musculoskeletal ultrasonography (US) and to determine the overall agreement about the US results compared with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which served as the imaging "gold standard". Methods: The clinically dominant joint regions (shoulder, knee, ankle/toe, wrist/finger) of four patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases were ultrasonographically examined by 14 experts. US results were compared with MRI. Overall agreements, sensitivities, specificities, and interobserver reliabilities were assessed. Results: Taking an agreement in US examination of 10 out of 14 experts into account, the overall κ for all examined joints was 0.76. Calculations for each joint region showed high κ values for the knee (1), moderate values for the shoulder (0.76) and hand/finger (0.59), and low agreement for ankle/toe joints (0.28). κ Values for bone lesions, bursitis, and tendon tears were high (κ = 1). Relatively good agreement for most US findings, compared with MRI, was found for the shoulder (overall agreement 81%, sensitivity 76%, specificity 89%) and knee joint (overall agreement 88%, sensitivity 91%, specificity 88%). Sensitivities were lower for wrist/finger (overall agreement 73%, sensitivity 66%, specificity 88%) and ankle/toe joints (overall agreement 82%, sensitivity 61%, specificity 92%). Conclusion: Interobserver reliabilities, sensitivities, and specificities in comparison with MRI were moderate to good. Further standardisation of US scanning techniques and definitions of different pathological US lesions are necessary to increase the interobserver agreement in musculoskeletal US.     

Diagnostic quality and scoring of synovitis, tenosynovitis and erosions in low-field MRI of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison with conventional MRI

OBJECTIVE: To compare dedicated low-field MRI (lfMRI) with conventional MRI (cMRI) in the detection and scoring of synovitis, tenosynovitis and erosions in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The wrist and finger joints of 17 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (median (range) disease duration 8 years (7-12); Disease Activity Score 3.3 (2.6-4.5)) were examined by 0.2 T lfMRI and 1.5 TcMRI. The protocols comprised coronal spin-echo and three-dimensional gradient-echo sequences before and after contrast medium administration. Synovitis of the metacarpophalangeal and proximal interphalangeal joints 2-5 and the wrist joints was scored according to Outcome Measures in Rheumatology recommendations. Tenosynovitis and erosions were scored using 4-point and 6-point scales, respectively. The results were analysed by calculating kappa values and performing McNemar's test intra-individually on a joint-by-joint basis. RESULTS: Agreement between the two MRI techniques was good to excellent for synovitis and erosions, and moderate for tenosynovitis. Of the 306 joints evaluated, 245 and 200 joints showed synovitis in lfMRI and cMRI, respectively. Scoring of synovitis of the finger joints yielded kappa values from 0.69 to 0.94. Of the 68 flexor tendons evaluated, tenosynovitis was diagnosed by lfMRI in 24 and by cMRI in 33 instances. Of the 391 bones evaluated, 154 and 139 showed erosions in lfMRI and cMRI, respectively. kappa values for erosion scores were between 0.65 and 1. CONCLUSION: Dedicated, lfMRI shows high agreement with cMRI in diagnosing and scoring synovitis, tenosynovitis and erosions in rheumatoid arthritis when using standardised scoring systems.     

The value of sonography in the detection of bone erosions in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison with conventional radiography

OBJECTIVE: The ability to make an early, accurate diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has become increasingly important with the availability of new, expensive, and targeted therapies. However, plain radiography, the traditional method of detecting the characteristic bone erosions and an important adjunct in establishing a diagnosis of RA, is known to be insensitive. This study compared sonography, a modern imaging technique, with conventional radiography for the detection of erosions in the metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints of patients with RA. METHODS: One hundred RA patients (including 40 with early disease) underwent posteroanterior radiography and sonography of the MCP joints of the dominant hand. Twenty asymptomatic control subjects also underwent sonography. Erosion sites were recorded and subsequently compared using each modality. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed on the second MCP joint in 25 patients with early RA to confirm the pathologic specificity of sonographic erosions. Intraobserver reliability of sonography readings was assessed using video recordings of 55 MCP joint scans of RA patients, and interobserver reliability was assessed by comparing 160 MCP joint scans performed sequentially by 2 independent observers. RESULTS: Sonography detected 127 definite erosions in 56 of 100 RA patients, compared with radiographic detection of 32 erosions (26 [81%] of which coincided with sonographic erosions) in 17 of 100 patients (P < 0.0001). In early disease, sonography detected 6.5-fold more erosions than did radiography, in 7.5-fold the number of patients. In late disease, these differences were 3.4-fold and 2.7-fold, respectively. On MRI, all sonographic erosions not visible on radiography (n = 12) corresponded by site to MRI abnormalities. The Cohen-kappa values for intra- and interobserver reliability of sonography were 0.75 and 0.76, respectively. CONCLUSION: Sonography is a reliable technique that detects more erosions than radiography, especially in early RA. Sonographic erosions not seen on radiography corresponded to MRI bone abnormalities. This technology has potential in the management of patients with early RA/inflammatory arthritis and is likely to have major implications for the future practice of rheumatology.     

Interreader agreement in the assessment of magnetic resonance images of rheumatoid arthritis wrist and finger joints--an international multicenter study

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) allows direct visualization of inflammation and destruction in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) joints. However, MRI scoring methods have not yet been standardized or appropriately validated. Our aim was to examine interreader agreement for a simple system of scoring RA changes on MRI among 5 centers that had not undertaken intergroup calibration. MRI of RA wrist and metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints were scored by experienced readers in 5 centers in different countries. In substudy 1, 5 sets of 2nd-5th MCP joints from UK [Technique A: 1.5 T, coronal and axial T1 and T2 spin-echo, -/+ fat saturation (FS), -/+ iv gadolinium (Gd)] were scored for synovitis (score 0-3) and bone lesions (0-3). In substudy 2, we evaluated 19 sets of 2nd-5th MCP joints [10 sets from UK (Technique A) and 9 sets from the US (Technique B: 1.5 T; coronal T1 spin-echo and T2* gradient-echo + FS, no Gd)] and 19 wrist joints [9 from the US (Technique B) and 10 from Denmark (Technique C: 1.0 T; coronal and axial T1 spin-echo, no FS, -/+ Gd)]. Synovitis (0-3), bone lesions (0-3), and joint space narrowing (JSN, 0-3) were scored in each MCP joint and in 3 different regions of the wrist. Bone erosions and lesions in each bone were scored 0-5. Substudy 1 served to test and redesign the score sheets. In substudy 2, the scores of synovitis and bone lesions by the 5 groups were the same or differed by only one grade in 73% and 85% of joints, respectively. On MRI that included 2 imaging planes and iv Gd (Techniques A and C), these rates were 86% (synovitis) and 97% (bone lesions). Corresponding intraclass correlation coefficients (quadratic weighted kappas) were 0.44-0.68, mean 0.58 (synovitis), and 0.44-0.69, mean 0.62 (bone lesion), i.e., in the moderate to good range. Unweighted kappa values were in the low to moderate range, generally lowest for JSN (< 0.20), better for synovitis and bone erosions, and best for bone lesions, being generally highest for MRI with 2 planes pre- and post-Gd and in MCPjoints compared with wrists. These preliminary results suggest that the basic interpretation of MRI changes in RA wrist and MCP joints is relatively consistent among readers from different countries and medical backgrounds, but that further training, calibration, and standardization of imaging protocols and grading schemes will be necessary to achieve acceptable intergroup reproducibility in assessing synovitis and bone destruction in RA multicenter studies.     

Assessment of inflammatory activity in rheumatoid arthritis: a comparative study of clinical evaluation with grey scale and power Doppler ultrasonography

OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical assessment of overall inflammatory activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with grey scale and power Doppler (PD) ultrasonography (US). METHODS: Ninety four consecutive patients with RA were included. Demographic and clinical data, C reactive protein (CRP) level, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) were recorded for each patient. The presence of tenderness, swelling, and a subjective swelling score from 1 to 3 were independently assessed by two rheumatologists, who reached a consensus in 60 joints examined in each patient. All patients underwent a US examination by a third blinded rheumatologist, using PD. US joint effusion, synovitis, and PD signal were graded from 1 to 3 in the 60 joints. Joint count and joint index for effusion, synovitis, and PD signal were recorded. A 28 joint count for clinical and US variables was calculated. Interobserver reliability of the US examination was evaluated by a fourth blinded rheumatologist. RESULTS: US showed significantly more joints with effusion (mean 15.2) and synovitis (mean 14.6) than clinical examination (mean 11.5, p<0.05). A significant correlation was found between joint count and joint index for swelling, US effusion, synovitis, and PD signal. The 28 joint count for effusion, synovitis, and PD signal correlated highly with the corresponding 60 joint counts. US findings correlated better with CRP and ESR than clinical measures. Interobserver reliability was better for US findings than for clinical assessment. CONCLUSION: US is a sensitive method for assessing joint inflammatory activity in RA, complementary to clinical evaluation.     

Ultrasound imaging for the rheumatologist VII. Ultrasound imaging in rheumatoid arthritis

The present review provides an update of the available data and discusses research issues of ultrasound (US) imaging in rheumatoid arthritis (RA).Currently the principal indications for using US in the assessment of patients with RA include: detection of sub-clinical synovitis, demonstration of bone erosion undetected by conventional radiography, detailed assessment of tendon pathology and guided injection and aspiration of joints and soft tissues. Future potential applications are likely to include short and long term therapy monitoring and early detection of cartilaginous changes in RA.The main priorities requiring the attention of investigators include: addressing validity issues, especially those related to criterion and discriminator validity, development of international consensus on scoring systems, evaluation of the role of power Doppler in the assessment of disease activity, development of a specific training programme for rheumatologists performing US and investigation of the potential of 3D US using a volumetric probe.     

Diagnostic value of magnetic resonance imaging of the forefeet in early rheumatoid arthritis when findings on imaging of the metacarpophalangeal joints of the hands remain normal

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the diagnostic role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the forefeet in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in whom findings on MR images of the hands are normal and conventional radiographs of the hands and feet do not show erosions. METHODS: The study group comprised 25 patients with early RA (disease duration of <12 months) in whom erosions were not demonstrated on conventional radiographs of the hands and feet. These patients underwent MRI of the clinically dominant hand to detect signs of arthritis. If results of MRI of the hand were normal according to the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Clinical Trials (OMERACT) RA-MRI scoring system (RAMRIS), MRI of the dominant forefoot was performed. The MRI protocol comprised coronal and sagittal T1-weighted spin-echo (before and after administration of contrast medium), coronal fat-suppressed short tau inversion recovery sequences, coronal and sagittal T2-weighted turbo spin-echo sequences, and axial fat-suppressed T1-weighted spin-echo sequences after administration of contrast medium. MRI of the forefeet was analyzed on the basis of a modified RAMRIS. RESULTS: MRI revealed pathologic findings in the hands of 15 of 25 patients (edema in 9 patients, synovitis in 12, erosions in 6, defects in 3). In 10 patients with a mean disease duration of 9.4 weeks, hand MRI scans were normal according to RAMRIS. Four of these 10 patients had tenosynovitis of the finger flexor tendons (there was no OMERACT criterion for tenosynovitis). RAMRIS analysis of the corresponding MRI scans of the forefeet of these patients revealed signs of edema in 7 patients, synovitis in all 10 patients (at the third metatarsophalangeal [MTP] joint in 7, at the fourth MTP joint in 6, at the first MTP joint in 4, and at the fifth MTP joint in 2 patients), tenosynovitis of the foot flexor tendons in 2 patients, erosions at the second and third MTP joints in 1 patient, and a single defect at the first MTP joint in 1 patient. CONCLUSION: RAMRIS analysis of MRI scans of the forefeet detected synovitis and bone edema in patients with early RA in whom MRI of the finger joints was normal. MRI of the forefeet contributes an additional tool aimed at earlier and more accurate diagnosis and thus might allow an earlier decision to start appropriate medication in patients with early RA.