Does caries in primary teeth predict enamel defects in permanent teeth? A longitudinal study

The notion that caries in primary teeth causes developmental defects of enamel in permanent teeth has been recently revived. The research objective was to test this hypothesis through analysis of data from the Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and Development Study, a longstanding prospective cohort study. The maxillary incisors of 663 children were assessed for existing restorations and dental caries at age five and for developmental defects of enamel at age nine. Where a primary tooth had been carious, the permanent successor was more likely to have a demarcated opacity after adjustment for gender, family socio-economic status, years of exposure to water fluoridation, trauma to primary teeth, and early loss of primary teeth (unadjusted OR = 2.3, 95% CI 1.3, 4.1; adjusted OR = 2.2, 95% CI 1.1, 4.3). These findings support a time-ordered association between dental caries in primary maxillary incisors and demarcated opacities in their permanent successors.     

Is there evidence for the use of lesion sterilization and tissue repair therapy in the endodontic treatment of primary teeth? A systematic review and meta-analyses

Clinical Oral Investigations - To assess whether lesion sterilization and tissue repair (LSTR) technique resulted in similar clinical and radiographic success outcomes as compared with pulpectomy...     

Which procedures and materials could be applied for full pulpotomy in permanent mature teeth? A systematic review

Objective: Coronal pulpotomies were recently re-investigated as an alternative to root canal treatment in vital permanent teeth. General dentists may be interested in knowing how to perform full pulpotomy, in particular in face of difficult endodontic cases of vital teeth.

Material and methods: A systematic review was undertaken on the PubMed and Cochrane databases in order to determine which procedure should be applied for pulp capping and coronal restoration in routine dental practice. Fifty-three publications were included and allocated to one of two methodological categories: histological and clinical studies.

Results and conclusions: There is no evidence to recommend one single procedure for full pulpotomy in vital permanent teeth that can be indicated for different pulpal diagnoses which differ greatly in terms of the inflammation process from healthy teeth to irreversible pulpitis. For each clinical case, all actions aiming to prevent pre-operative contamination, to control per-operative infection and to achieve a complete seal above the radicular pulp sections are unavoidable steps that should be complied with. Reproducing procedures adopted in high quality trials could insure high success rates.     

Antibiotics at replantation of avulsed permanent teeth? A systematic review

ObjectivesAt present there is no clear consensus whether systemic antibiotics should be administered at replantation of an avulsed permanent tooth. This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the evidence on effectiveness and harms of the administration of systemic antibiotics at replantation of avulsed permanent teeth.MethodsIn August 2020 a systematic literature search was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, for systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials (RCT) and observational controlled studies in MEDLINE, PreMedline, Embase, and the Cochrane databases.The population of interest were medically fit patients with a replanted avulsed tooth. Main outcomes were tooth survival, periodontal healing, pulpal revascularization as well as (severe) adverse events. These outcomes were compared in patients who did and who did not receive systemic antibiotics. The GRADE methodology was used to assess the quality of evidence.ResultsThe search yielded no RCTs, and none of the 7 included observational studies had the prime intent to investigate the effectiveness or harms of antibiotics. According to GRADE, the overall level of evidence was very low. The meta-analyses showed non-significant associations between the administration of systemic antibiotics on the one hand and tooth survival (1 study, RR = 3.70, 95% CI: 0.63-21.69), periodontal healing (meta-analysis of 6 studies RR: 1.07; 95% CI: 0.80-1.45), and pulpal revascularization (meta-analysis of 2 studies, RR: 0.36; 95% CI: 0.05-2.41) on the other hand.ConclusionCurrently there is no high-quality evidence to support the use of systemic antibiotics at replantation of avulsed permanent teeth. Hence, their routine use cannot be recommended in medically fit patients. Well-designed RCTs should be a priority on the research agenda.     

Selective,stepwise, or nonselective removal of carious tissue: which technique offers lower risk for the treatment of dental caries in permanent teeth? A systematic review and meta-analysis

This study aimed to systematically review the literature regarding the risk of selective removal—in comparison with stepwise and nonselective removal     

Is manual reduction adequate for intraoperative control of occlusion during fixation of mandibular fractures? A systematic review and meta-analysis

The aim of this systematic review was to find out if manual intraoperative control of occlusion is adequate for the reduction of mandibular fractures in comparison with intermaxillary fixation (IMF). We searched PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library and Clinical Trials Registry, and the references of included trials. Our primary outcomes of interest were the reduction of fracture anatomically and radiographically, occlusal disturbances, and the incidence of revision procedures due to poor occlusion or reduction. Our secondary outcomes of interest were operating time and infective complications. Of the 257 studies retrieved (manual reduction = 136, IMF = 121), four were included. The studies had an unclear risk of bias. Nevertheless, the overall effect was statistically significant and in favour of manual reduction, with a lower number of adverse events in the manual reduction group (n = 43) than in the IMF group (n = 78), odds ratio 0.42 (95% CI 0.27 to 0.64). An absolute reduction in adverse events was seen in occlusion disturbances (120 fewer/1000), revision procedures (164 fewer/1000), and infective complications (178 fewer/1000). The evidence to support manual reduction over IMF for the intraoperative control of fracture fragments and occlusion was derived from few studies with an unclear risk of bias, and the quality was low. The results were not different when condylar fractures were present. The overall certainty of evidence was moderate. Clinicians should select the appropriate technique based on the injury pattern, and the treating surgeon’s experience and available resources.     

How effective is 5-Fluorouracil as an adjuvant in the management of odontogenic keratocyst? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Odontogenic keratocyst (OKC) is known for its benign but aggressive clinical behaviour, and presents a challenge in its management due to high recurrence rate following surgical intervention. The sourcing of Carnoy’s solution, the widely used adjunct in OKC treatment, has lately become difficult especially after its banning by the United States Food and Drugs Agency (FDA). This has generated interest in exploring alternative chemical agents such as 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) and Modified Carnoy’s solution (MCS). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness of 5-FU as an adjunct following surgical intervention of OKC. A protocol was registered in PROSPERO prior to the literature search. All studies reporting the use of 5-FU in OKC treatment were included in the initial search of multiple literature databases. Of the 148 initially identified articles, three met the criteria for the final appraisal. The relevant data were extracted and a meta-analysis was undertaken in relation to recurrence rate and nerve paraesthesia. There were no recurrence observed in cases treated with 5-FU (n=56), and the incidence of nerve paraesthesia was 20% (none permanent). This systematic review has revealed early encouraging results for 5-FU as an adjunct, however a caution is recommended due to overall low quality of evidence related to individual studies. We present the cumulative evidence on the effectiveness of 5-FU in OKC treatment with discussion on its mechanism of action, safety profile, application protocol, and the implications for clinical practice.     

Is the injection of tramadol effective at control of pain after impacted mandibular third molar extractions? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background Third molar extraction is among the most common surgical procedures performed by oral-maxillofacial surgeons. Postoperative pain, swelling and trismus are common, especially in wisdom teeth, due to trauma to local tissues and the duration of the surgical procedure, among other factors.Material and Methods This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the ‘Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses’ in order to answer the focused question: ‘Is the local submucosal injection of tramadol effective at the control of postoperative pain in patients submitted to impacted mandibular third molar extractions?’. We analyzed papers published until March 30, 2021 in the MEDLINE|PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases. Gray literature was also consulted. Standard pairwise meta-analyses of direct comparisons were performed using a fixed-effect model; I2 ≥ 50 % or ≥ 75 % indicated moderate or high heterogeneity, respectively. Risk of bias was assessed by Cochrane Collaboration’s tool.Results In total, 172 participants (98 males and 74 females, aged 18 or over) from three randomized placebo-controlled trials were considered for analysis. The submucosal injection of 2 ml of tramadol adjacent to the impacted mandibular third molar was effective in controlling pain up to 6-hours after surgery, in increasing the onset of consumption of rescue analgesic and in reducing the total number of rescue analgesics used.Conclusions The submucosal injection of tramadol can be considered a safe and effective procedure for pain control after impacted mandibular third molar extractions. Key words:Tramadol, impacted teeth, third molars, postoperative pain, adverse effects.     

Is bromelain an effective drug for the control of pain and inflammation associated with impacted third molar surgery? Systematic review and meta-analysis

The aim of this systematic review was to determine whether bromelain is an effective drug for the control of pain and inflammation associated with third molar surgery. Randomized, controlled clinical trials on the subject were identified through a systematic search of the literature using the PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases. This review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Two independent, blinded reviewers selected studies based on the inclusion criteria. Divergences of opinion were resolved by consensus. A meta-analysis was performed for the outcomes pain and trismus and was based on the inverse variance method for continuous outcomes, considering the mean difference (MD) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). A total of 186 articles were initially retrieved from the databases. After the different stages of the selection process, five articles reporting data for a total 252 patients remained and were included in the review. Bromelain proved to be effective at controlling postoperative pain at 48–72 h after surgery (P = 0.03; MD ?0.89, 95% CI ?1.70 to ?0.09), but did not achieve a significant effect in comparison to the control group with regard to oedema or trismus.     

Is there an association between overweight/obesity and dental implant complications? A systematic review and meta-analysis

The aim of this systematic review was to test the following hypotheses: (1) that there is no difference in implant survival rate between individuals with overweight or obesity and those who are within the ideal weight range; (2) that there are no differences between these groups regarding indicators of peri-implant health. Two independent reviewers performed a literature search of the PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases for studies published up to April 1, 2018. A meta-analysis was performed to determine the risk difference for implant failure and mean difference for marginal bone loss, probing depth, and bleeding on probing. Six studies were selected for review, involving a total of 746 patients with 986 implants: 609 in overweight or obese individuals and 377 in individuals within the ideal weight range. The findings of this systematic review indicate that the first hypothesis should be accepted, since no statistically significant difference in implant survival rate was found between individuals with overweight/obesity and those within the ideal weight range (P = 0.64). The second hypothesis was rejected, as the review indicated a difference in marginal bone loss (P < 0.00001), probing depth (P < 0.00001), and bleeding around dental implants (P < 0.00001).     

Is dental caries experience increased in HIV-infected children and adolescents? A meta-analysis

Abstract

Objective. To undertake a systematic review to assess if HIV-infected children and adolescents have an increased dental caries experience. Methods. A search of MEDLINE, BIREME, EMBASE, GOOGLE SCHOLAR, SIGLE (Grey Literature) and reference lists of included studies was carried out. To be eligible the studies had to present HIV-infected and non-infected children/adolescents between 0–18 years old. To assess the methodological quality, the studies were categorized in scores from ‘A’ to ‘C’. To perform a meta-analysis a random effect model was used with 95% confidence intervals and two distinct sub-group analyses were carried out in terms of caries progression: data for cavitated and non-cavitated lesions (sub-group 1) and data only for cavitated lesions (sub-group 2). Results. Five studies fulfilled the selection criteria. Four studies (two ranked A and two B in the quality assessment) revealed higher caries scores in primary teeth in the HIV-infected patients with mean dmft/dmfs scores of 3.8–4.1/7.8–11.0 compared to the control group 1.5–2.4/3.4–5.1. No differences in caries index were found for permanent dentition. The meta-analysis excluded caries data of permanent teeth and showed a significant association between caries experience in primary dentition and HIV infection considering cavitated and non-cavitated lesions (OR = 2.33, 95% CI = 1.48–3.68) or only cavitated lesions (OR = 2.98, 95% CI = 1.59–5.59). Conclusion. Evidence exists that suggests HIV-infected children/adolescents have an increased caries experience in primary dentition.     

Is pulpotomy a promising modality in treating permanent teeth? An umbrella review

Odontology - Emerging evidence suggests the use of less invasive therapy such as pulpotomy in treating permanent teeth with pulp exposure and signs of pulpitis. Hence, this umbrella review aims to...     

Treatment of pulps in teeth affected by deep caries – A systematic review of the literature

BackgroundThis systematic review assesses the effect of methods commonly used to manage the pulp in cases of deep caries lesions, and the extent the pulp chamber remains uninfected and does not cause pulpal or periapical inflammatory lesions and associated tooth-ache over time.Study designAn electronic literature search included the databases PubMed, EMBASE, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Cochrane Reviews from January 1950 to March 2013. In addition, hand searches were carried out. Two reviewers independently evaluated abstracts and full-text articles. An article was read in full if at least one of the two reviewers considered the abstract potentially relevant. Altogether, 161 articles were read in full text. Of these, 24 studies fulfilled established inclusion criteria. Based on studies of at least moderate quality, the quality of evidence of each procedure was rated in four levels according to GRADE.ResultsNo study reached the high quality level. Twelve were of moderate quality. The overall evidence was insufficient to assess which of indirect pulp capping, stepwise excavation, direct excavation and pulp capping/partial pulpotomy, pulpotomy or pulpectomy is the most effective treatment approach for teeth with deep caries.ConclusionsBecause of the lack of good studies it is not possible to determine whether an injured pulp by deep caries can be maintained or whether it should be removed and replaced with a root canal filling. Both randomized studies and prospective observational studies are needed to investigate whether a pulp exposed to deep caries is best treated by measures intended to preserve it or by pulpectomy and root filling.