The effect of hyperoxia following cardiac arrest - A systematic review and meta-analysis of animal trials

Aim

There are conflicting findings from observational studies regarding the nature of the association between hyperoxia and risk of mortality in patients admitted to intensive care following cardiac arrest. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates animal data investigating the effect of administration of high concentrations of oxygen following cardiac arrest on neurological outcome and the clinical applicability of this data.

Methods

A systematic search of Medline and Embase identified controlled animal studies modelling cardiac arrest with subsequent cardiopulmonary resuscitation that compared ventilation with 100% oxygen to lower concentrations following return of spontaneous circulation. Eligible studies were included in a meta-analysis in which the inverse variance weighted differences were calculated for the standardised mean difference of the primary outcome measure, the neurological deficit score.

Results

Ten studies met the criteria for inclusion in the systematic review. In a meta-analysis of six studies, with 95 animals, treatment with 100% oxygen resulted in a significantly worse neurological deficit score than oxygen administered at lower concentrations, with a standardised mean difference of −0.64 (95% CI −1.06 to −0.22). In four of five studies, histological evidence of increased neuronal damage was present in animals that received 100% oxygen therapy.

Conclusions

The administration of 100% oxygen therapy is associated with worse neurological outcome than lower oxygen concentrations in animal models of cardiac arrest. However, due to limitations in study design and poor generalisability of the animal models to the situation of post cardiac arrest resuscitation in humans, the clinical applicability of this data is uncertain.     

Association between early arterial blood gas tensions and neurological outcome in adult patients following in-hospital cardiac arrest

ObjectiveThe early partial pressures of arterial O₂ (PaO₂) and CO₂ (PaCO₂) have been found in animal studies to be correlated with neurological outcome after brain injury. However, the relationship of early PaO₂ and PaCO₂ to the neurological outcomes of resuscitated patients after cardiac arrest was still not clear.MethodsThis was a retrospective observational cohort study in a single medical center. Adult patients who had in-hospital cardiac arrest between 2006 and 2012 and achieved sustained return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) (ROSC > 20 min without resumption of chest compression) were included. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with favorable neurological outcome at hospital discharge. The first PaO₂ and PaCO₂ values measured after first sustained ROSC were used for analysis.ResultsOf the 550 included patients, 154 (28%) survived to hospital discharge and 74 (13.5%) achieved favorable neurological outcome. The mean time from sustained ROSC to the measurement of PaO₂ and PaCO₂ was 136.8 min. The mean PaO₂ and PaCO₂ were 167.4 mmHg and 40.3 mmHg, respectively. PaO₂ between 70 and 240 mmHg (odds ratio [OR] 1.96, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.08–3.64) and PaCO₂ levels (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.95–0.99) were positively and inversely associated with favorable neurological outcome, respectively.ConclusionsThe early PaO₂ and PaCO₂ levels obtained after ROSC might be correlated with neurological outcome of patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest. However, because of the inherent limitations of the retrospective design, these results should be further validated in future studies.     

Standard dose epinephrine versus placebo in out of hospital cardiac arrest: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction

Out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is a time critical and heterogeneous presentation. The most appropriate management strategies remain an issue for debate. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the association of epinephrine versus placebo with return of spontaneous circulation, survival to hospital admission, survival to hospital discharge and neurological outcomes in out of hospital cardiac arrest.

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality and patient survival outcome in cardiac arrest: A systematic review and meta-analysis

AimTo conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine whether cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) quality, as indicated by parameters such as chest compression depth, compression rate and compression fraction, is associated with patient survival from cardiac arrest.MethodsFive databases were searched (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus and Cochrane) as well as the grey literature (MedNar). To satisfy inclusion criteria, studies had to document human cases of in- or out-of hospital cardiac arrest where CPR quality had been recorded using an automated device and linked to patient survival. Where indicated (I² < 75%), meta-analysis was undertaken to examine the relationship between individual CPR quality parameters and either survival to hospital discharge (STHD) or return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC).ResultsDatabase searching yielded 8,842 unique citations, resulting in the inclusion of 22 relevant articles. Thirteen were included in the meta-analysis. Chest compression depth was significantly associated with STHD (mean difference (MD) between survivors and non-survivors 2.59 mm, 95% CI: 0.71, 4.47); and with ROSC (MD 0.99 mm, 95% CI: 0.04, 1.93). Within the range of approximately 100–120 compressions per minute (cpm), compression rate was significantly associated with STHD; survivors demonstrated a lower mean compression rate than non-survivors (MD −1.17 cpm, 95% CI: −2.21, −0.14). Compression fraction could not be examined by meta-analysis due to high heterogeneity, however a higher fraction appeared to be associated with survival in cases with a shockable initial rhythm.ConclusionsChest compression depth and rate were associated with survival outcomes. More studies with consistent reporting of data are required for other quality parameters.     

Adrenaline for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Introduction

The evidence for adrenaline in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) resuscitation is inconclusive. We systematically reviewed the efficacy of adrenaline for adult OHCA.

Methods

We searched in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library from inception to July 2013 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating standard dose adrenaline (SDA) to placebo, high dose adrenaline (HDA), or vasopressin (alone or combination) in adult OHCA patients. Meta-analyses were performed using random effects modeling. Subgroup analyses were performed stratified by cardiac rhythm and by number of drug doses. The primary outcome was survival to discharge and the secondary outcomes were return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), survival to admission, and neurological outcome.

Results

Fourteen RCTs (n = 12,246) met inclusion criteria: one compared SDA to placebo (n = 534), six compared SDA to HDA (n = 6174), six compared SDA to an adrenaline/vasopressin combination (n = 5202), and one compared SDA to vasopressin alone (n = 336). There was no survival to discharge or neurological outcome differences in any comparison group, including subgroup analyses. SDA showed improved ROSC (RR 2.80, 95%CI 1.78–4.41, p < 0.001) and survival to admission (RR 1.95, 95%CI 1.34–2.84, p < 0.001) compared to placebo. SDA showed decreased ROSC (RR 0.85, 95%CI 0.75–0.97, p = 0.02; I² = 48%) and survival to admission (RR 0.87, 95%CI 0.76–1.00, p = 0.049; I² = 34%) compared to HDA. There were no differences in outcomes between SDA and vasopressin alone or in combination with adrenaline.

Conclusions

There was no benefit of adrenaline in survival to discharge or neurological outcomes. There were improved rates of survival to admission and ROSC with SDA over placebo and HDA over SDA.     

Delayed versus immediate defibrillation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest due to ventricular fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Background

Human studies over the last decade have indicated that delaying initial defibrillation to allow a short period of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) may promote a more responsive myocardial state that is more likely to respond to defibrillation and result in increased rates of restoration of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and/or survival. Out-of-hospital studies have produced conflicting results regarding the benefits of CPR prior to defibrillation in relation to survival to hospital discharge. The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing the effect of delayed defibrillation preceded by CPR with immediate defibrillation on survival to hospital discharge.

Methods

A systematic literature search of key electronic databases including Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library was conducted independently by two reviewers. Randomised controlled trials meeting the eligibility criteria were critically appraised according to the Cochrane Group recommended methodology. Meta-analyses were conducted for the outcomes of survival to hospital discharge overall and according to response time of emergency medical services.

Results

Three randomised controlled trials were identified which addressed the question of interest. All included studies were methodologically appropriate to include in a meta-analysis. Pooled results from the three studies demonstrated no benefit from providing CPR prior to defibrillation compared to immediate defibrillation for survival to hospital discharge (OR 0.94 95% CI 0.46-1.94). Meta-analysis of results according to ambulance response time (≤5 min or >5 min) also showed no difference in survival rates.

Conclusion

Delaying initial defibrillation to allow a short period of CPR in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest due to VF demonstrated no benefit over immediate defibrillation for survival to hospital discharge irrespective of response time. There is no evidence that CPR before defibrillation is harmful. Based on the existing evidence, EMS jurisdictions are justified continuing with current practice using either defibrillation strategy.     

The use of antiarrhythmic drugs for adult cardiac arrest: a systematic review

Aims

In adult cardiac arrest, antiarrhythmic drugs are frequently utilized in acute management and legions of medical providers have memorized the dosage and timing of administration. However, data supporting their use is limited and is the focus of this comprehensive review.

Methods

Databases including PubMed, Cochrane Library (including Cochrane database for systematic reviews and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), Embase, and AHA EndNote Master Library were systematically searched. Further references were gathered from cross-references from articles and reviews as well as forward search using SCOPUS and Google scholar. The inclusion criteria for this review included human studies of adult cardiac arrest and anti-arrhythmic agents, peer-review. Excluded were review articles, case series and case reports.

Results

Of 185 articles found, only 25 studies met the inclusion criteria for further review. Of these, 9 were randomised controlled trials. Nearly all trials solely evaluated Ventricular Tachycardia (VT) and Ventricular Fibrillation (VF), and excluded Pulseless Electrical Activity (PEA) and asystole. In VT/VF patients, amiodarone improved survival to hospital admission, but not to hospital discharge when compared to lidocaine in two randomized controlled trials.

Conclusion

Amiodarone may be considered for those who have refractory VT/VF, defined as VT/VF not terminated by defibrillation, or VT/VF recurrence in out of hospital cardiac arrest or in-hospital cardiac arrest. There is inadequate evidence to support or refute the use of lidocaine and other antiarrythmic agents in the same settings.     

Antiarrhythmia drugs for cardiac arrest: a systemic review and meta-analysis

Introduction

Antiarrhythmia agents have been used in the treatment of cardiac arrest, and we aimed to review the relevant clinical controlled trials to assess the effects of antiarrhythmics during cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Methods

We searched databases including Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials; MEDLINE, and EMBASE. Clinical controlled trials that addressed the effects of antiarrhythmics (including amiodarone, lidocaine, magnesium, and other new potassium-channel blockers) on the outcomes of cardiac arrest were included. Data were collected independently by two authors. The risk ratio of each outcome was collected, and meta-analysis was used for data synthesis if appropriate. Heterogeneity was assessed with the χ² test and the I² test.

Results

Ten randomized controlled trials and seven observational trials were identified. Amiodarone (relative risk (RR), 0.82; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.54 to 1.24), lidocaine (RR, 2.26; 95% CI, 0.93to 5.52), magnesium (RR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.54 to 1.24) and nifekalant were not shown to improve the survival to hospital discharge compared with placebo, but amiodarone, lidocaine, and nifekalant were shown to be beneficial to initial resuscitation, assessed by the rate of return of spontaneous circulation and survival to hospital admission, with amiodarone being superior to lidocaine (RR, 1.28; 95% CI, 0.57 to 2.86) and nifekalant (RR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.19 to 1.31). Bretylium and sotalol were not shown to be beneficial.

Conclusions

Our review suggests that when administered during resuscitation, antiarrhythmia agents might not improve the survival to hospital discharge, but they might be beneficial to initial resuscitation. This is consistent with the AHA 2010 guidelines for resuscitation and cardiovascular emergency, but more studies with good methodologic quality and large numbers of patients are still needed to make further assessment.     

机械心肺复苏对心脏骤停患者复苏效果影响的Meta分析

目的:评价使用机械心肺复苏对心脏骤停患者复苏结局的影响。方法:系统检索中国知网、维普、万方、PUBMED、Web of Science等数据库中关于机械心肺复苏和徒手心肺复苏的相关文献,提取有效数据后用RevMan5.3软件进行Meta分析。结果:共计纳入20项临床研究,包含29 727例患者,其中11 104例患者在...     

Global incidences of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and survival rates: Systematic review of 67 prospective studies

Aim

The aim of this investigation was to estimate and contrast the global incidence and outcome of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) to provide a better understanding of the variability in risk and survival of OHCA.

Methods

We conducted a review of published English-language articles about incidence of OHCA, available through MEDLINE and EmBase. For studies including adult patients and both adult and paediatric patients, we used Utstein data reporting guidelines to calculate, summarize and compare incidences per 100,000 person-years of attended OHCAs, treated OHCAs, treated OHCAs with a cardiac cause, treated OHCA with ventricular fibrillation (VF), and survival-to-hospital discharge rates following OHCA.

Results

Sixty-seven studies from Europe, North America, Asia or Australia met inclusion criteria. The weighted incidence estimate was significantly higher in studies including adults than in those including adults and paediatrics for treated OHCAs (62.3 vs 34.7; P < 0.001); and for treated OHCAs with a cardiac cause (54.6 vs 40.8; P = 0.004). Neither survival to discharge rates nor VF survival to discharge rates differed statistically significant among studies. The incidence of treated OHCAs was higher in North America (54.6) than in Europe (35.0), Asia (28.3), and Australia (44.0) (P < 0.001). In Asia, the percentage of VF and survival to discharge rates were lower (11% and 2%, respectively) than those in Europe (35% and 9%, respectively), North America (28% and 6%, respectively), or Australia (40% and 11%, respectively) (P < 0.001, P < 0.001).

Conclusions

OHCA incidence and outcome varies greatly around the globe. A better understanding of the variability is fundamental to improving OHCA prevention and resuscitation.     

Pediatric resuscitation and cardiac arrest

Cardiac arrest in children is, fortunately, a relatively infrequent event. Mortality rate after cardiac arrest is greater than 50%. This article discusses strategies to increase the chance of survival to discharge. These strategies focus on suggestions for organizing a system prepared to care for critically ill children, incorporating the 2010 American Heart Association resuscitation guidelines into clinical practice, and encouraging physicians to become advocates of decreasing the occurrence of pediatric cardiac arrest. Providing the best-prepared system available to care for critically ill children will, it is hoped, decrease the number of preventable deaths in children.     

Outcomes following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with an initial cardiac rhythm of asystole or pulseless electrical activity in Victoria,Australia

Background

While internationally reported survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is improving, much of the increase is being observed in patients presenting to emergency medical services (EMS) in shockable rhythms. The purpose of this study was to assess survival and 12-month functional recovery in patients presenting to EMS in asystole or pulseless electrical activity (PEA).

Methods

The Victorian Ambulance Cardiac Arrest Registry was searched for adult OHCA patients presenting in non-shockable rhythms in Victoria, Australia between 1st July 2003 and 30th June 2013. We excluded patients defibrillated prior to EMS arrival and arrests witnessed by EMS. Twelve-month quality-of-life interviews were conducted on survivors who arrested between 1st January 2010 and 31st December 2012. The main outcome measures were survival to hospital discharge and 12-month functional recovery measured by the Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOSE).

Results

A total of 38,378 non-shockable OHCA attended by EMS were included, of which 88.0% were asystole and 11.6% were PEA. Of the patients receiving resuscitation, survival to hospital discharge was 1.1% for asystole and 5.9% for PEA (p < 0.001), with no significant improvement observed over the 10 year study period. In survivors with 12-month follow-up data, the combined rate of death, vegetative state or lower severe disability was 66.7% (95% CI 41.0–80.0%) for asystole and 44.7% (95% CI 30.2–59.9%) for PEA.

Conclusion

Survival outcomes following OHCA with initial rhythms of asystole or PEA did not improve over the 10-year study period. Our findings indicate high rates of death within 12 months, and unfavourable functional recovery for survivors.     

The effect of team-based CPR on outcomes in out of hospital cardiac arrest patients: A meta-analysis

Objectives

The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the effects of team cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) on outcomes of patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).

The effect of percutaneous coronary intervention in patients suffering from ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction complicated by out-of-hospital cardiac arrest on 30 days survival

Aim of the study

To question the beneficial effects of the recommended early percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest on 30-day survival with favourable neurological outcome.

Methods

Prospectively collected data of 1277 out of hospital cardiac arrest patients between 2005 and 2010 from a registry at a tertiary care university hospital were used for a cohort study.

Results

In 494 (39%) arrest patients ST-segment elevation was identified in 249 (19%). Within 12 h after restoration of spontaneous circulation catheter laboratory investigations were initiated in 197 (79%) and PCI in 183 (93%) (78% got PCI in less than180 min). Adjustment for a cumulative time without chest compressions <2 min, initial shockable rhythm, cardiac arrest witnessed by healthcare professionals, and a higher core temperature at time of hospitalization reduced the effect of PCI on favourable neurological outcome at 30 days (OR 1.40; 95% CI, 0.53–3.7) compared to the univariate analysis (OR 2.52; 95% CI, 1.42–4.48).

Conclusion

This cohort study failed to demonstrate the beneficial effects of PCI as part of post-resuscitation care on 30-day survival with a favourable neurological outcome.     

New treatment bundles improve survival in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients: A historical comparison

Introduction

Before the introduction of the new international cardiac arrest treatment guidelines in 2005, patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) of cardiac origin in Northern Italy had very poor prognosis. Since 2006, a new bundle of care comprising use of automated external defibrillators (AEDs) and therapeutic hypothermia (TH) was started, while extracorporeal CPR program (ECPR) for selected refractory CA and dispatcher-assisted cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was started in January 2010.

Objectives

We hypothesized that a program of bundled care might improve outcome of OHCA patients.

Methods

We analyzed data collected in the OHCA registry of the MB area between September 2007 and August 2011 and compared this with data from 2000 to 2003.

Results

Between 2007 and 2011, 1128 OHCAs occurred in the MB area, 745 received CPR and 461 of these had a CA of presumed cardiac origin. Of these, 125 (27%) achieved sustained ROSC, 60 (13%) survived to 1 month, of whom 51 (11%) were discharged from hospital with a good neurological outcome (CPC ≤ 2), and 9 with a poor neurological outcome (CPC > 2).Compared with data from the 2000 to 2003 periods, survival increased from 5.6% to 13.01% (p < 0.0001). In the 2007–2011 group, low-flow time and bystander CPR were independent markers of survival.

Conclusions

OHCA survival has improved in our region. An increased bystander CPR rate associated with dispatcher-assisted CPR was the most significant cause of increased survival, but duration of CA remains critical for patient outcome.     

吸气阻力阀联合心肺复苏术对心脏骤停患者疗效的Meta分析

目的系统评价应用吸气阻力阀（ITD）联合心肺复苏术（CPR）对心脏骤停患者的疗效。 方法计算机检索PubMed、ISI WOK平台数据库、Science Online、Nature、中文生物医学文献库（CMCC）、万方数据资源、CNKI中国知网、维普电子资源数据库中关于应用ITD和未使用ITD进行CPR的临床对照研究,检索时间为2000年至2015年6月。由2名研究者按照纳入及排除标准独立进行文献筛选、资料提取和质量评估后,采用Revman 5.3软件对数据进行Meta分析。 结果共纳入8项研究,共包括138 992例心脏骤停患者,其中应用ITD组（ITD组）患者7 056例,未应用ITD（对照组）患者6 936例。Meta分析结果显示,自主循环恢复率两组间比较差异无统计学意义[OR=1.03,95%CI（0.96,1.11）,Z=0.93,P=0.35],复苏后改良Rankin评分≤ 3的比例ITD组明显优于对照组[OR=1.74,95%CI（1.11,2.73）,Z=2.40,P=0.02],复苏后存活出院率ITD组优于对照组[OR=1.40,95%CI（1.04,1.91）,Z=2.18,P=0.03]。亚组分析结果显示,应用ITD联合主动胸外按压-减压心肺复苏术（ACD-CPR）（ITD + ACD-CPR）组的自主循环恢复率[OR=1.13,95%CI（1.01,1.26）,Z=2.11,P=0.03]、复苏后改良Rankin评分≤ 3的比例[OR=1.53,95%CI（1.22,1.93）,Z=3.67,P<0.001]及复苏后存活出院率[OR=1.25,95%CI（1.04,1.49）,Z=2.38,P=0.02]均明显优于对照组。 结论应用吸气阻力阀联合ACD-CPR可以提高心脏骤停患者心肺复苏成功率。     

Use of rapid sequence intubation predicts improved survival among patients intubated after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

Objective

Some observational studies indicate that endotracheal intubation is associated with a worse outcome compared to bag-mask ventilation after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in emergency medical services (EMS) systems without rapid sequence intubation (RSI). We evaluated the role of RSI in airway management following cardiac arrest.

Methods

We conducted a cohort study of all non-traumatic arrest patients treated by a metropolitan EMS system from 2007 to 2011. Advanced airway management information was obtained from a prospective airway registry and linked to a cardiac arrest registry. We used multivariate logistic regression to estimate the association between attempted intubation status and survival to hospital discharge.

Results

Of 3133 patients, 82% underwent attempted intubation without RSI, 15% underwent attempted RSI, and 3% experienced no intubation attempt. Survival to hospital discharge differed by attempted intubation status: 11% (n = 291/2576) for intubation without RSI, 48% (n = 226/471) for RSI, and 71% (n = 61/86) for “no intubation.” Compared to the intubation without RSI group, the adjusted odds ratios of survival were 5.6 (95% CI 4.3, 7.2) for the RSI group and 15 (95% CI 9, 27) for the “no intubation” group.

Conclusion

In this population-based cohort of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, RSI was used in 15% of patients and associated with a better prognosis than intubation attempted without paralytics. Because this subset with a favorable prognosis may not be readily intubated in systems without paralytics, these findings could help to explain the adverse relationship between intubation and survival observed in prior studies.     

Volume versus outcome: More emergency medical services personnel on-scene and increased survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

Background and aim: The large regional variation in survival after treatment of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is incompletely explained. Communities respond to OHCA with differing number of emergency medical services (EMS) personnel who respond to the scene. The effect of different numbers of EMS personnel on-scene upon outcomes is unclear. We sought to evaluate the association between number of EMS personnel on-scene and survival after OHCA.MethodsWe performed a retrospective review of prospectively collected data on 16,122 EMS-treated OHCA events from December 1, 2005 to May 31, 2007 from a combined population over 21 million people residing in an area of over 33,000 square miles in Canada and the United States. Number of EMS personnel on-scene was defined as the number of EMS personnel who responded to the scene of OHCA within 15 min after 9-1-1 call receipt and prior to patient death or transport away from the scene. Associations with survival to hospital discharge were assessed by using generalized estimating equations to construct multivariable logistic regression models.ResultsCompared to a reference number of EMS personnel on-scene of 5 or 6, 7 or 8 EMS personnel on-scene was associated with a higher rate of survival to hospital discharge, adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.35 (95% CI: 1.05, 1.73). There was no significant difference in survival between 5 or 6 personnel on-scene versus fewer.ConclusionMore EMS personnel on-scene within 15 min of 9-1-1 call was associated with improved survival of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. It is unlikely that this finding was mediated solely by earlier CPR or earlier defibrillation.     

Active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) versus standard CPR for cardiac arrest patients: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND:

Active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ACDCPR) has been popular in the treatment of patients with cardiac arrest (CA). However, the effect of ACD-CPR versus conventional standard CPR (S-CRP) is contriversial. This study was to analyze the efficacy and safety of ACD-CPR versus S-CRP in treating CA patients.

METHODS:

Randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials published from January 1990 to March 2011 were searched with the phrase “active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation and cardiac arrest” in PubMed, EmBASE, and China Biomedical Document Databases. The Cochrane Library was searched for papers of meta-analysis. Restoration of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) rate, survival rate to hospital admission, survival rate at 24 hours, and survival rate to hospital discharge were considered primary outcomes, and complications after CPR were viewed as secondary outcomes. Included studies were critically appraised and estimates of effects were calculated according to the model of fixed or random effects. Inconsistency across the studies was evaluated using the I2 statistic method. Sensitivity analysis was made to determine statistical heterogeneity.

RESULTS:

Thirteen studies met the criteria for this meta-analysis. The studies included 396 adult CA patients treated by ACD-CPR and 391 patients by S-CRP. Totally 234 CA patients were found out hospitals, while the other 333 CA patients were in hospitals. Two studies were evaluated with high-quality methodology and the rest 11 studies were of poor quality. ROSC rate, survival rate at 24 hours and survival rate to hospital discharge with favorable neurological function indicated that ACD-CPR is superior to S-CRP, with relative risk (RR) values of 1.39 (95% CI 0.99–1.97), 1.94 (95% CI 1.45–2.59) and 2.80 (95% CI 1.60–5.24). No significant differences were found in survival rate to hospital admission and survival rate to hospital discharge for ACD-CPR versus S-CRP with RR values of 1.06 (95% CI 0.76–1.60) and 1.00 (95% CI 0.73–1.38).

CONCLUSION:

Quality controlled studies confirmed the superiority of ACD-CPR to S-CRP in terms of ROSC rate and survival rate at 24 hours. Compared with S-CRP, ACD-CPR could not improve survival rate to hospital admission or survival rate to hospital discharge.KEY WORDS: Active compression-decompression, Cardiopulmonary resuscitation, Cardiac arrest, Meta-analysis     

Characteristics and outcome among 14,933 adult cases of in-hospital cardiac arrest: A nationwide study with the emphasis on gender and age

Aim

To investigate characteristics and outcome among patients suffering in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) with the emphasis on gender and age.