Successful and sustained treatment of chronic radiation proctitis with antioxidant vitamins E and C

OBJECTIVE: Chronic radiation proctitis, a common sequelae of pelvic radiation, is characterized by obliteration of the submucosal vasculature with subsequent ischemia and reperfusion injury. Oxidative stress is thought to be a major mechanism in radiation proctitis. Therefore, antioxidants (vitamins E and C) may be beneficial. METHODS: Twenty consecutive symptomatic outpatients with endoscopically documented radiation proctitis seen in a single gastroenterology clinic were given a combination of vitamin E (400 IU tid) and vitamin C (500 mg tid). Previous radiation therapy was given for prostatic (n = 10) or gynecological (n = 10) malignancies. These patients presented with one or more of the following symptoms: rectal bleeding, rectal pain, diarrhea, or fecal urgency. Using a questionnaire, these symptoms were rated by the patients in terms of their severity (grade 0-4) and frequency (grade 0-4) before and after treatment with vitamins E and C. A symptom index was calculated by the addition of the severity and frequency scores (8 = most symptomatic). The lifestyle impact of the symptoms was also assessed by questionnaire grading from 0 (no effect on daily activity) to 4 (afraid to leave home). Among these 20 patients, 10 patients who received vitamins E and C for 1 yr were assessed again to determine whether their initial responses were sustained. RESULTS: There was a significant (p < 0.05; Wilcoxon rank) improvement in the symptom index (before treatment vs after treatment with vitamins E and C) for bleeding (median score: 4 vs 0), diarrhea (median score: 5 vs 0), and urgency (median score: 6 vs 3). Patients with rectal pain did not improve significantly. Bleeding resolved in four of 11 patients, diarrhea resolved in eight of 16 patients, fecal urgency resolved in three of 16 patients, and rectal pain resolved in two of six patients. Lifestyle improved in 13 patients, including seven patients who reported a return to normal. Two of the patients with no improvement in their daily symptoms also had radiation ileitis. All 10 patients who underwent a second follow-up interview reported sustained improvement in their symptoms 1 yr later. CONCLUSION: A substantial number of patients with radiation proctitis seem to benefit from antioxidant therapy. A double-blind placebo-controlled trial is needed to confirm this open-labeled pilot study.     

Open study of low-dose amitriptyline in the treatment of patients with idiopathic fecal incontinence

INTRODUCTION: Amitriptyline, a tricyclic antidepressant agent with anticholinergic and serotoninergic properties, has been used empirically in the treatment of idiopathic fecal incontinence with good results. METHODS: An open study was conducted to test the response to amitriptyline 20 mg daily for four weeks by 18 patients (2 males) of median age 66 years with idiopathic fecal incontinence. Incontinence scores, number of bowel movements, computerized ambulatory anorectal pressures, and pudendal nerve terminal motor latencies were evaluated before and after four weeks of therapy. Twenty-four control subjects (10 males) of median age 61 years were also assessed. RESULTS: Amitriptyline improved incontinence scores (median pretreatment score=16vs. median posttreatment score=3;P<0.001) and reduced the number of bowel movements per day (P<0.001). Amitriptyline also decreased the frequency (median pretreatment frequency=4.5 per hourvs. median immediate posttreatment frequency=1.2 per hour (P<0.05); control median frequency=0.3 per hour) and the amplitude of rectal motor complexes (median pretreatment rectal pressure=94 cm H₂Ovs. median immediate posttreatment rectal pressure=58 cm H₂O (P<0.05); control median rectal pressure=36 cm H₂O) and improved anal pressures during these events (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Amitriptyline improved symptoms in 89 percent of patients with fecal incontinence. The data support that the major change with amitriptyline is a decrease in the amplitude and frequency of rectal motor complexes. The second conclusion is that drug increases colonic transit time and leads to the formation of a firmer stool that is passed less frequently. These in combination may be the source of the improvement in continence.Presented at the European Council of Coloproctology Biennial Meeting, Edinburgh, United Kingdom, June 17 to 19, 1997. Published in abstract form in theInternational Journal of Colorectal Disease 1997;12:143.     

Preoperative Chemoradiation for Rectal Cancer Causes Prolonged Pudendal Nerve Terminal Motor Latency

Purpose A worsened anorectal function after chemoradiation for high-risk rectal cancer is often attributed to radiation damage of the anorectum and pelvic floor. Its impact on pudendal nerve function is unclear. This prospective study evaluated the short-term effect of preoperative combined chemoradiation on anorectal physiologic and pudendal nerve function. Methods Sixty-six patients (39 men, 27 women) with localized resectable (T3, T4, or N1) rectal cancer were included in the study. All patients received 45 Gy (1.8 Gy/day in 25 fractions) over five weeks, plus 5-fluorouracil (350 mg/m²/day) and leucovorin (20 mg/m²/day) concurrently on days 1 to 5 and 29 to 33. Patients who had rectal cancer with a distal margin within 6 cm of the anal verge had the anus included in the field of radiotherapy (Group A, n = 26). Patients who had rectal cancer with a distal margin 6 to 12 cm from the anal verge had shielding of the anus during radiotherapy (Group B, n = 40). The Wexner continence score, anorectal manometry and pudendal nerve terminal motor latency were assessed at baseline and four weeks after completion of chemoradiation. Results The median Wexner score deteriorated significantly (P < 0.0001) from 0 to 2.5 for both Groups A (range, 0–8) and B (range, 0–14). The maximum resting anal pressures were unchanged after chemoradiation. The maximum squeeze anal pressures were reduced (mean = 166.5–157.5 mmHg) after chemoradiation. This change was similar in both Groups A and B. Eighteen patients (Group A = 7, Group B = 11) developed prolonged pudendal nerve terminal motor latency after chemoradiation. These 18 patients similarly had a worsened median Wexner continence score (range, 0–3) and maximum squeeze anal pressures (mean = 165.5–144 mmHg). The results obtained were independent of tumor response to chemoradiation. Conclusions Preoperative chemoradiation for rectal cancer carries a significant risk of pudendal neuropathy, which might contribute to the incidence of fecal incontinence after restorative proctectomy for rectal cancer. Poster presentation at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, April 30 to May 5, 2005.     

Long-Term Effect of Preoperative Radiation Therapy on Anorectal Function

Purpose Preoperative radiotherapy improves local control in rectal cancer treatment, but there are few reports on the influence of radiotherapy on anorectal function. The aim of the present study was to assess late effects of short-course, high-dose radiotherapy on anorectal function after low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Methods Sixty-four patients, randomized within the Stockholm Radiotherapy Trials and operated on with low anterior resection with or without preoperative radiotherapy (mean, 14 years), previously were followed up with quality-of-life questionnaires, clinical examination, anorectal manometry, and endoanal ultrasound. Twenty-one patients had received preoperative radiotherapy of the rectum and 43 patients had been treated with surgery alone. Results Impaired anorectal function was common after low anterior resection for rectal cancer and the risk was increased after radiotherapy. Irradiated patients had significantly more symptoms of fecal incontinence (57 vs. 26 percent, P = 0.01), soiling (38 vs. 16 percent, P = 0.04), and significantly more bowel movements per week (20 vs. 10, P = 0.02). At anorectal manometry, irradiated patients had significantly lower resting (35 mmHg vs. 62 mmHg, P < 0,001) and squeeze pressures (104 mmHg vs. 143 mmHg, P = 0.05). At endoanal ultrasound, irradiated patients had significantly more scarring of the anal sphincters (33 vs. 13 percent, P = 0.03). There were no significant differences in quality-of-life scores between irradiated and nonirradiated patients; however, patients with anal incontinence had significantly lower quality-of-life scores compared to continent patients. Conclusions Short-course radiotherapy, including the anal sphincters, impairs anorectal function and increases gastrointestinal symptoms permanently when the anal sphincters are irradiated. Supported by the The Swedish Cancer Society and the Stockholm Cancer Society. Study was conducted at the Karolinska and Danderyd Hospitals, Stockholm, Sweden. Presented at the Tripartite Colorectal Meeting, Dublin, Ireland, July 3 to 7, 2005. Reprints are not available.     

Significance of pelvic floor muscles in anal incontinence

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The pathophysiology of anal incontinence may be elusive using current parameters. Our aim was to establish the role of the levator ani in anal continence. METHODS: In 53 patients with anal incontinence, 30 with constipation as disease controls, and 15 healthy controls, we evaluated incontinence severity by a 0-12 scale, anorectal function by standard manometric tests, and levator ani contraction by a perineal dynamometer. RESULTS: Patients with incontinence exhibited various physiologic abnormalities (3.2 +/- 0.3 per patient), but multiple regression analysis showed that levator ani contraction was the independent variable with strongest relation to the severity of incontinence (R = -0.84; P < 0.0001), as well as a predictive factor of the response to treatment (R = 0.53; P < 0.01). Furthermore, in contrast to other physiologic parameters, clinical improvement in response to treatment (4.4 +/- 0.5 score vs. 7.9 +/- 0.5 score pre; P < 0.001) was associated with a marked and significant strengthening of levator ani contraction (448 +/- 47 g vs. 351 +/- 35 g pre; P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: We have shown the importance of levator ani failure in understanding the etiology of anal incontinence and in predicting response to treatment.     

Clinical effects of preoperative radiation therapy on anorectal function after proctectomy and colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis

PURPOSE: Preoperative radiotherapy is increasingly used for certain rectal cancers, although some evidence suggests that it may adversely affect anorectal function. Reconstruction with a colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis after complete proctectomy is thought to improve function, but few published data on pouch function after radiation exists. The aim of our study was to compare long-term bowel habits in patients receiving preoperative radiation for rectal cancer followed by colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis with those of patients having similar rectal cancer surgery without radiation. METHODS: Patients (n = 125) having undergone colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis for rectal cancer, of whom 28 had preoperative radiotherapy and 97 did not, responded to a detailed questionnaire about their bowel habits at least 12 months after surgery, with a mean (± standard deviation) interval of 64 (±42) months. Radiation was administered preoperatively as a short (25 Gy over 5 days, n = 22) or long (45 Gy over 4 weeks, n = 6) course. All patients had colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis with manual anastomosis at or immediately above the dentate line. RESULTS: Except for tumor stage, no preoperative difference was observed between the two groups. The number of bowel movements per 24 hours in patients with and without radiation was 1.8 (±0.8) and 1.8 (±1.5), respectively (P > 0.05). In the irradiated group, diarrhea (39 vs. 13 percent, P = 0.005) and nocturnal defecation (36 vs. 15 percent, P = 0.03) were more frequent than in the nonirradiated group. No other significant difference existed between groups with regard to stool clustering, use of protective pads, ability to defer evacuation >15 minutes, ability to evacuate the bowel within 30 minutes, incontinence score, use of medications, or dietary restriction. CONCLUSION: Preoperative radiotherapy followed by proctectomy and colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis significantly increased nocturnal defecation frequency and diarrhea compared with similar nonirradiated patients but had no influence on the other bowel-habit parameters studied.     

Rectal compliance as a routine measurement

PURPOSE: The clinical impact of rectal compliance and sensitivity measurement is not clear. The aim of this study was to measure the rectal compliance in different patient groups compared with controls and to establish the clinical effect of rectal compliance. METHODS: Anorectal function tests were performed in 974 consecutive patients (284 men). Normal values were obtained from 24 controls. Rectal compliance measurement was performed by filling a latex rectal balloon with water at a rate of 60 ml per minute. Volume and intraballoon pressure were measured. Volume and pressure at three sensitivity thresholds were recorded for analysis: first sensation, urge, and maximal toleration. At maximal toleration, the rectal compliance (volume/pressure) was calculated. Proctoscopy, anal manometry, anal mucosal sensitivity, and anal endosonography were also performed as part of our anorectal function tests. RESULTS: No effect of age or gender was observed in either controls or patients. Patients with fecal incontinence had a higher volume at first sensation and a higher pressure at maximal toleration (P=0.03), the presence of a sphincter defect or low or normal anal pressures made no difference. Patients with constipation had a larger volume at first sensation and urge (P<0.0001 andP<0.01). Patients with a rectocele had a larger volume at first sensation (P=0.004). Patients with rectal prolapse did not differ from controls; after rectopexy, rectal compliance decreased (P<0.0003). Patients with inflammatory bowel disease had a lower rectal compliance, most pronounced in active proctitis (P=0.003). Patients with ileoanal pouches also had a lower compliance (P<0.0001). In the 17 patients where a maximal toleration volume<60 ml was found, 11 had complaints of fecal incontinence, and 6 had a stoma. In 31 patients a maximal toleration volume between 60 and 100 ml was found; 12 patients had complaints of fecal incontinence, and 6 had a stoma. Proctitis or pouchitis was the main cause for a small compliance. All 29 patients who had a maximal toleration volume>500 ml had complaints of constipation. No correlation between rectal and anal mucosal sensitivity was found. CONCLUSION: Rectal compliance measurement with a latex balloon is easily feasible. In this series of 974 patients, some patient groups showed an abnormal rectal visceral sensitivity and compliance, but there was an overlap with controls. Rectal compliance measurement gave a good clinical impression about the contribution of the rectum to the anorectal problem. Patients with proctitis and pouchitis had the smallest rectal compliance. A maximal toleration volume<60 ml always led to fecal incontinence, and stomas should be considered for such patients. A maximal toleration volume>500 ml was only seen in constipated patients, and therapy should be given to prevent further damage to the pelvic floor. Values close to or within the normal range rule out the rectum as an important factor in the anorectal problem of the patient.Drs. Sloots and Poen were supported by a grant from Janssen-Cilag. Presented at the meeting of the Dutch Society of Gastroenterology, Veldhoven, the Netherlands, October 7 to 8, 1999.     

Impact of Pelvic Radiotherapy on Morbidity and Durability of Sphincter Preservation After Coloanal Anastomosis for Rectal Cancers

Purpose This study was designed to assess the impact of pelvic radiotherapy on the incidence of complications and colostomy-free survival of patients after a coloanal anastomosis for rectal cancer. Methods A total of 192 patients underwent a coloanal anastomosis between 1982 and 2001: 87 patients did not receive pelvic radiotherapy; 105 patients received pelvic radiotherapy (39 preoperative and 66 postoperative). Early and late complications requiring surgical intervention and the colostomy-free survival rate were assessed by retrospective review of patient records. Results After a median follow-up of 62 months, 151 patients were alive. The most frequent complication was development of an anastomotic stricture (5-year rate of a stricture, 16 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, 10–21). Patients receiving pelvic radiotherapy had a higher rate of complications other than anastomotic strictures, including fecal incontinence, fistulas, abscesses, and bowel obstructions compared with patients not receiving pelvic radiotherapy (5-year rate: 20 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 10–29) vs. 5 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 0–10); P = 0.001). Patients receiving pelvic radiotherapy had a lower colostomy-free survival than did patients not receiving pelvic radiotherapy (5-year colostomy-free rate: 72 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 62–84) vs. 92 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 86–98); P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the colostomy-free survival of patients receiving preoperative and postoperative pelvic radiotherapy. Conclusions After coloanal anastomosis, a significant number of patients will have complications requiring surgical intervention, and some will require a permanent colostomy. Pelvic radiotherapy, whether it is administered preoperatively or postoperatively, significantly increases the need for a permanent colostomy.     

Anorectal function after modern conformal radiation therapy for prostate cancer: a pilot study

We evaluated whether, and if so to what extent, radiotherapy applied on a series of patients with prostate cancer influenced the patient's bowel habits and anorectal function. Ten consecutive patients participated in the study. The median age of the patients was 74 years (range, 61–71) and the average follow-up period was 22 (range, 15–28) months. Four patients were irradiated using external beam radiotherapy (2 Gy/day for a total of 70 Gy); 6 patients were irradiated with a combination of external beam radiotherapy (50 Gy, 2 Gy/day) and high dose rate brachytherapy (two 10-Gy fractions). Upon interview, patients disclosed characteristic functiona disturbances such as urgency with occasional accidents, faecal soiling and spotting of underwear. Involuntary release of gas was another embarrassing problem. One or more of these problems were present in half of the patients. Endoscopy disclosed signs of mild proctitis. Sphincter pressure, rectal capacity and the volume threshold for appreciation of defecation urge were all significantly lower in patients than in 10 age-matched controls. In conclusion, disturbances of anorectal function with imperfection of incontinence still occur so some extent despite improved precision, and reduced margins offered by the modern conformal radiation therapy of prostate cancer. Anal sphincter function, the reservoir capacity of the rectum and its sensory function are adversely affected and radiation proctitis with rectal fibrosis and damage of the extrinsic innervations of the anal sphincters appear to be the principal causative factors. Although conformal radiotherapy together with better positioning may be two substantial improvements of modern radiotherapy, further improvements are needed. Received: 11 May 2002 / Accepted: 12 June 2002 Correspondence to L. Hultén     

Effects of Biofeedback Therapy on Anorectal Function in Obstructive Defecation

Biofeedback therapy improves symptoms inpatients with constipation and obstructive defecation.Whether it also improves anorectal function is unclear.Our purpose was to investigate prospectively the effects of biofeedback therapy on subjective andobjective parameters of anorectal function in 25consecutive patients with obstructive defecation.Biofeedback therapy consisted of pelvic floor relaxationexercises (phase I) and neuromuscular conditioning ofrectal sensation and rectoanal coordination, with asolid state manometry system and simulated defecationmaneuvers (phase II). The number of sessions wascustomized for each patient. Clinical improvement wasassessed from the changes in anorectal manometry,balloon (50 cc) expulsion test, and the symptom andstool diaries. The number of therapy sessions varied[mean (range) = 6 (2-10)]. After therapy, whenstraining as if to defecate, the percentage analrelaxation, intrarectal pressure, and defecation indexincreased (P < 0.001). The balloon expulsion time,laxative consumption, and straining effort decreased (P< 0.001). Before therapy, 16/25 (64%) patients hadimpaired rectal sensation, and after therapy thisimproved (P < 0.001). After therapy, 15/25 (60%) patients reported 75% satisfaction with bowelhabit and 8/25 (32%) reported 50% satisfaction (P< 0.001); 15/16 (94%) patients discontinued digitaldisimpaction. Biofeedback therapy not only improves subjective but also objective parameters ofanorectal function in at least 76% of patients byrectifying the underlying pathophysiologicdisturbance(s). Sensory conditioning and customizing thenumber of sessions may offer additionalbenefits.     

Soiling: anorectal function and results of treatment

Forty-five patients with soiling but without faecal incontinence were evaluated by means of anorectal function investigations (anal manometry, rectal capacity and saline infusion test). The causes of soiling and the effect of treatment on both soiling and anorectal function were studied. The results were compared with a control group of 161 patients without soiling or incontinence. The diagnoses were haemorrhoids (10), mucosal prolapse (7), rectal prolapse (6), fistulae (5), proctitis (3), faecal impaction (2), rectocele with intussusception (2), scars after fistulectomy (2) and others (8). Simple inspection and proctoscopy were generally sufficient to establish a diagnosis. For two patients the diagnosis rectocele was made after defaecography. Anorectal test results did not differ between the soiling and control group, did not contribute to establish a diagnosis and did not change after treatment. Only patients with a rectal prolapse had abnormal results in anorectal function tests: a low basal sphincter pressure and a limited continence reserve. Appropriate therapy resulted in complete recovery (44%) or improvement of symptoms (29%).     

Proktitis aus Sicht der Proktologie*

Proctitis may cause anal bleeding, anal mucus secretion, diarrhea, urge incontinence, pain at defecation, etc. At digital rectal examination a thickened mucosal lining may be palpated and blood is found on the examination glove. At endoscopy erosive or ulcerative lesions are found that bleed easily on contact. Also polyp-like or even tumor-like lesions, telangiectasias and atypical fistulas can be seen. The symptoms and the findings on examination are quite often unspecific; a detailed history of the patient is most important in the work-up for the differential diagnosis. Serological and microbiological examinations should be done as well as biopsies (except for radiation proctitis). Proctitis may occur after applying external agents that cause chemical, thermal as well as pharmaceutical reactions in the rectum. Proctitis may occur after fecal diversion. Ischemic proctitis causes severe pain and fecal incontinence and may occur postoperatively, after shock/anaphylaxis, etc. The solitary rectal ulcer (syndrome) has a more or less mechanical etiology and shows clearly defined pathohistological lesions. It often occurs in women with outlet obstruction and/or rectal, mucosal or hemorrhoidal prolapse. Except for rectal prolapse, treatment of the solitary rectal ulcer is not always simple or successful. The same applies to radiation proctitis that may occur after radiotherapy. Radiated anorectal tissue regenerates slowly or not at all. Therefore invasive procedures should not be performed because of the high risk for the development of ulceration or fistula. Treatment of radiation proctitis is not always simple and it does not have a high level of evidence. In most cases therapy should be performed individually, according to the severity of complaints.     

Acute effects of therapeutic irradiation for prostatic carcinoma on anorectal function

Aim—The incidence ofanorectal symptoms after radiotherapy (RTH) for localised pelvicmalignant disease is unclear. In addition, the effects of pelvicirradiation on both anorectal motility and sensory function are poorlydefined. A prospective study was therefore performed on 35 patients(55-82 years of age) with localised prostatic carcinoma before andfour to six weeks after RTH to assess its effects on anorectal function.
Methods—Anorectalsymptoms were assessed by questionnaire. Anorectal pressures at restand in response to voluntary squeeze, rectal distension, and increasesin intra-abdominal pressure were evaluated with perfused sleeve sidehole manometry. Rectal sensation was tested during graded balloondistension. Rectal compliance was calculated by the pressure-volumerelation obtained during the testing of rectal sensation. Ultrasoundwas used to determine anal sphincter structure and integrity.
Results—RTH had noeffect on anal sphincter morphology. The frequency of defecationincreased after RTH (7 (3-21) v 10 (3-56) bowel actions a week; p<0.01). After RTH, 16 patients had faecal urgency and eight faecal incontinence, compared with five and onerespectively before RTH (p<0.01 for each). Basal and squeeze sleeverecorded pressures were reduced after RTH (54 (3)v 49(3) mm Hg (p<0.05) and 111 (8)v 102 (8) mm Hg (p<0.01), before and afterRTH respectively; means (SEM)). Rectal compliance was reduced after RTH(1.2 v 1.4 mm Hg/ml, p<0.05). After RTH,threshold volumes for perception of rectal distension were lower in the 16 patients who either experienced faecal urgency for the first time(13 patients) or reported worsening of this symptom (three patients)compared with the remaining patients (34 (4)v 48 (5) ml respectively, p<0.05).
Conclusion—Faecalincontinence (23%) is a common problem four to six weeks after RTH forprostatic carcinoma and is associated with minor reductions in analsphincter pressures. The high prevalence of faecal urgency in patientsafter RTH may be related to alterations in rectal perception of stool.

Keywords:anorectal function; radiotherapy; motility; manometry; incontinence

     

Randomized controlled trial of biofeedback for fecal incontinence

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Behavioral treatment (biofeedback) has been reported to improve fecal incontinence but has not been compared with standard care. METHODS: A total of 171 patients with fecal incontinence were randomized to 1 of 4 groups: (1) standard care (advice); (2) advice plus instruction on sphincter exercises; (3) hospital-based computer-assisted sphincter pressure biofeedback; and (4) hospital biofeedback plus the use of a home electromyelogram biofeedback device. Outcome measures included diary, symptom questionnaire, continence score, patient's rating of change, quality of life (short-form 36 and disease specific), psychologic status (Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale), and anal manometry. RESULTS: Biofeedback yielded no greater benefit than standard care with advice (53% improved in group 3 vs. 54% in group 1). There was no difference between the groups on any of the following measures: episodes of incontinence decreased from a median of 2 to 0 per week (P < 0.001). Continence score (worst = 20) decreased from a median of 11 to 8 (P < 0.001). Disease-specific quality of life, short-form 36 (vitality, social functioning, and mental health), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale all significantly improved. Patients improved resting, squeeze, and sustained squeeze pressures (all P < 0.002). These improvements were largely maintained 1 year after finishing treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Conservative therapy for fecal incontinence improves continence, quality of life, psychologic well-being, and anal sphincter function. Benefit is maintained in the medium term. Neither pelvic floor exercises nor biofeedback was superior to standard care supplemented by advice and education.     

Temperature-controlled radiofrequency energy (SECCA) to the anal canal for the treatment of faecal incontinence offers moderate improvement

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Faecal incontinence is a devastating complaint. Even after conservative treatment, many patients still remain incontinent. Few patients have a sphincter defect suitable for repair. Other emerging surgical therapies like dynamic gracilis plasty, neuromodulation or artificial bowel sphincter, carry side effects and show only moderate improvement. Temperature-controlled radiofrequency energy (SECCA) has shown promising results in the USA. Local tightening seems to be the mode of action with possible increased rectal sensitivity. We investigated the effectiveness of radiofrequency and possible changes in the anal sphincter with 3D-ultrasound in patients with faecal incontinence. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eleven women, mean age 61 years (49-73) with long-standing faecal incontinence were included. Patients with large sphincter defects and anal stenosis were excluded. The SECCA procedure was performed under conscious sedation and local anaesthesia. Oral antibiotics were given. In four quadrants on four or five levels (depending upon length of the anus) radiofrequency was delivered with multiple needle electrodes. Patients were evaluated at 0, 6 weeks, 3 and 6 months and 1 year. Three-dimensional anal ultrasound was performed at 0 (before and after the procedure), 6 weeks and 3 months. Anal manometry and rectal compliance measurement were performed at 0 and 3 months. RESULTS: At 3 months, six of 11 patients improved, which persisted during follow-up of 1 year. The Vaizey score changed from 18.8 to 15.0 (P=0.03) and in those improved from 18.3 to 11.5 (P=0.03). Anal manometry and rectal compliance showed no significant changes, there was a tendency to increased rectal sensitivity concerning urge and maximal tolerated volume (both P=0.3). Responders compared with nonresponders showed no difference in test results. Side effects were local haematoma (2), bleeding 3 days (1), pain persisting 1-3 weeks (4) and laxatives-related diarrhoea during 1-3 weeks (4). CONCLUSION: The SECCA procedure seems to be promising for patients with faecal incontinence with a persisting effect after 1 year. No significant changes in tests were found.     

A pilot study of total pelvic floor repair or gluteus maximus transposition for postobstetric neuropathic fecal incontinence

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to report pilot data comparing the morbidity and functional outcome of total pelvic floor repair with gluteus maximus transposition for women with postobstetric fecal incontinence. METHODS: This is a prospective, randomized trial of two surgical procedures in 24 women so far. Functional assessment was performed with use of a 20-point clinical incontinence score and patient questionnaire before and after operation. The physiologic parameters, before and after operation, included resting and squeeze anal pressures, length of the high pressure zone, anal and rectal mucosal sensitivity, and pudendal nerve latency. RESULTS: So far, 12 patients have been treated by total pelvic floor repair and 12 by gluteus maximus transposition. Of these, three patients developed wound complications after gluteus maximus transposition compared with none after total pelvic floor repair. Among these cases there was a significant overall improvement in functional score (given as mean ± standard deviation) after both total pelvic floor repair (13.1±2.7vs. 6.6±4.5;P<0.001) and gluteus maximus transposition (13.8±3.8vs. 7.7±6.1;P<0.01), although no difference existed between the groups. There was no change in any of the physiologic measurements after either operation, and preoperative measurements did not identify patients likely to do badly. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude from these preliminary data that both total pelvic floor repair and gluteus maximus transposition significantly improve continence in women with postobstetric neuropathic fecal incontinence. Gluteus maximus transposition gives equivalent results to total pelvic floor repair. Neither procedure has any influence on anorectal physiologic parameters.Preliminary results presented at the Association of Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland, Glasgow, Scotland, April 9 to 11, 1997.     

Functional changes after physiotherapy in fecal incontinence

Background Physiotherapy is a common treatment option in patients with fecal incontinence. Although physiotherapy may result in relief of symptoms, to what extent improvement is associated with changes in anorectal function is still unclear.Aim The aim of the present study was to investigate prospectively how anorectal function changes with physiotherapy and whether these changes are related to changes in fecal incontinence score.Methods Consenting consecutive patients (n=266) with fecal incontinence (91% women; mean age, 59 years) underwent anorectal manometry, anal and rectal mucosal sensitivity measurements, and rectal capacity measurement at baseline and after nine sessions of standardized pelvic floor physiotherapy. These findings were compared with changes in Vaizey incontinence score.Results On follow-up 3 months after physiotherapy, squeeze pressure (p=0.028), as well as urge sensation threshold (p=0.046) and maximum tolerable volume (p=0.018), had increased significantly. The extent of improvement was not related to age, duration of fecal incontinence, menopause, and endosonography findings. All other anorectal functions did not change. An improvement in the Vaizey score was moderately correlated with an increase in incremental squeeze pressure (r=0.14, p=0.04) and a decrease in anal mucosal sensitivity threshold (r=0.20, p=0.01).Conclusions Physiotherapy improves squeeze pressure, urge sensation, and maximum tolerable volume. However, improved anorectal function does not always result in a decrease in fecal incontinence complaints.     

Long-Term Anorectal Dysfunction After Postoperative Radiotherapy for Rectal Cancer

PURPOSE Adjuvant radiotherapy in the treatment of rectal cancer has been shown to increase long-term morbidity causing severe anorectal dysfunction with physiologic changes whose interaction remains poorly understood. This study examines long-term anorectal morbidity from adjuvant postoperative radiotherapy.METHODS In a prospective study, patients with Dukes B or C rectal carcinoma were randomized to postoperative radiotherapy or no adjuvant treatment after anterior resection. The long-term effect of radiotherapy on anorectal function in a subset of surviving patients was assessed from a questionnaire on subjective symptoms and from physiology laboratory evaluation and flexible sigmoidoscopy.RESULTS Twelve of 15 patients (80 percent) treated with radiotherapy had increased bowel frequency compared with 3 of the 13 patients (23 percent) who did not have radiation therapy (P = 0.003). The former group had loose or liquid stool more often (60 vs. 23 percent, P = 0.05), had fecal incontinence more often (60 vs. 8 percent, P = 0.004), and wore pad more often (47 vs. 0 percent, P = 0.004). They also experienced fecal urgency and were unable to differentiate stool from gas more often. Endoscopy revealed a pale and atrophied mucosa and telangiectasias in the irradiated patients. Anorectal physiology showed a reduced rectal capacity (146 vs. 215 ml, P = 0.03) and maximum squeeze pressure (59 vs. 93 cm H₂O, P = 0.003) in the radiotherapy group. Impedance planimetry demonstrated a reduced rectal distensibility in these patients (P < 0.0001).CONCLUSIONS Adjuvant postoperative radiotherapy after anterior resection causes severe long-term anorectal dysfunction, which is mainly the result of a weakened, less sensitive anal sphincter and an undistensible rectum with reduced capacity.     

Effect of Aging on Anorectal and Pelvic Floor Functions in Females

Purpose In females, fecal incontinence often is attributed to birth trauma; however, symptoms sometimes begin decades after delivery, suggesting that anorectal sensorimotor functions decline with aging. Methods In 61 asymptomatic females (age, 44 ± 2 years, mean ± standard error of the mean) without risk factors for anorectal trauma, anal pressures, rectal compliance, and sensation were assessed by manometry, staircase balloon distention, and a visual analog scale during phasic distentions respectively. Anal sphincter appearance and pelvic floor motion also were assessed by static and dynamic magnetic resonance imaging respectively in 38 of 61 females. Results Aging was associated with lower anal resting (r = −0.44, P < 0.001) and squeeze pressures (r = −0.32, P = 0.01), reduced rectal compliance (i.e., r for pressure at half-maximum volume vs. age = 0.4, P = 0.001), and lower (P ≤ 0.002) visual analog scale scores during phasic distentions at 16 (r = −0.5) and 24 mmHg (r = −0.4). Magnetic resonance imaging revealed normal anal sphincters in 29 females and significant sphincter injury, not associated with aging, in 9 females. The location of the anorectal junction at rest (r = 0.52, P < 0.001), squeeze (r = 0.62, P < 0.001), and Valsalva maneuver (r = 0.35, P = 0.03), but not anorectal motion (e.g., from resting to squeeze) was associated with age. Conclusions In asymptomatic females, aging is associated with reduced anal resting and squeeze pressures, reduced rectal compliance, reduced rectal sensation, and perineal laxity. Together, these changes may predispose to fecal incontinence in elderly females. Supported in part by Grants R01 HD38666, R01 HD41129, and R01 EB00212 (SJR) and General Clinical Research Center grant M01 RR00585 from the National Institutes of Health, U.S. Public Health Service. Presented at the meeting of the American Gastroenterological Association, Atlanta, Georgia, May 20 to 23, 2001. An erratum to this article is available at .     

Mejor calidad de vida y menor incontinencia fecal en pacientes con cáncer de recto con la estrategia de seguimiento watch and wait

IntroductionThe watch-and-wait (WW) strategy is an alternative to anterior resection in patients with rectal cancer (RC) that have had a complete clinical response to neoadjuvant treatment. Few reports describe the quality of life and functional anorectal disorders (FADs) in that population.AimTo analyze and compare the FADs and quality of life in patients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the rectum treated with neoadjuvant therapy, divided into two different strategy groups: group 1 (G1), WW; and group 2 (G2), anterior resection.Materials and methodsThirty patients (G1: n = 20 and G2: n = 10) that had finished neoadjuvant therapy at least 12 months prior were included. Mean patient age was 59.5 years (range: 41-79) and 15 of the patients were men. The FADs were evaluated through: a) clinical history, b) 21-day bowel diary, c) Jorge and Wexner fecal incontinence scale, d) anorectal manometry (ARM), and fecal incontinence quality of life scale (FIQL).ResultsBowel diary: fecal incontinence (40%) and urge to defecate (45%) in G1 vs. fecal incontinence (60%) and urge to defecate (30%) in G2, with no significant differences (p = NS). Fecal incontinence scale: fecal incontinence in G1 was significantly less severe than that in G2 (median 6.5 points vs. 13 points [p = 0.0142]). ARM: no differences between the two groups. Quality of life: significantly different between the two groups (FIQL/G1: 3.7 vs. FIQL/G2: 2.8; p < 0.03).ConclusionsThe WW follow-up strategy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer was associated with better quality of life and reduced fecal incontinence.