C4d deposition without rejection correlates with reduced early scarring in ABO-incompatible renal allografts

C4d deposition in peritubular capillaries is a specific marker for the presence of antidonor antibodies in renal transplant recipients and is usually associated with antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in conventional allografts. In ABO-incompatible grafts, however, peritubular capillary C4d is often present on protocol biopsies lacking histologic features of AMR; the significance of C4d in this setting remains unclear. For addressing this, data from 33 patients who received ABO-incompatible renal allografts (after desensitization) were retrospectively reviewed. Protocol biopsies were performed at 1 and/or 3 and 6 mo after transplantation in each recipient and at 12 mo in 28 recipients. Twenty-one patients (group A) had strong, diffuse peritubular capillary C4d staining without histologic evidence of AMR or cellular rejection on their initial protocol biopsies. The remaining 12 patients (group B) had negative or weak, focal peritubular capillary C4d staining. Three grafts (two in group B) were lost but not as a result of AMR. Excluding these three patients, serum creatinine levels were similar in the two groups at 6 and 12 mo after transplantation and at last follow-up; however, recipients in group A developed significantly fewer overall chronic changes, as scored by the sum of Banff chronic indices, than group B during the first year after transplantation. These results suggest that diffuse peritubular capillary C4d deposition without rejection is associated with a lower risk for scarring in ABO-incompatible renal allografts; the generalizability of these results to conventional allografts remains unknown.     

Antibody-Mediated Rejection of a Pancreas Allograft

The role of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in pancreas transplantation is poorly understood. Here, we report on a patient who developed AMR of his pancreas allograft after receiving a simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant. Pre-operative enhanced cytotoxicity and flow cytometry T-cell crossmatches were negative; B-cell crossmatches were not performed as per institutional protocol. The patient's post-operative course was significant for elevated serum amylase levels and development of hyperglycemia approximately 1 month after transplantation. A pancreatic biopsy at this time showed no cellular infiltrate but strong immunofluorescent staining for C4d in the interacinar capillaries. Analysis of the patient's serum identified donor-specific HLA-DR alloantibodies. He received intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg), rituximab and plasmapheresis, and his pancreatic function normalized. We conclude that clinically significant AMR can develop in a pancreas allograft and recommend that pancreatic biopsies be assessed for C4d deposition if the patient has risk factors for AMR and/or the pathologic evidence for cell-mediated rejection is underwhelming.     

Early Ultrastructural Changes in Renal Allografts: Correlation With Antibody‐Mediated Rejection and Transplant Glomerulopathy

Transplant glomerulopathy (TG) is associated with antibody‐mediated renal allograft rejection (AMR) and reduced graft survival. Histologically, TG is typically seen >1 year posttransplantation. However, ultrastructural changes including glomerular endothelial swelling, subendothelial widening and early glomerular basement membrane duplication are associated with development of TG but appear much earlier. We examined the specificity of these changes for AMR, and whether these are inevitably associated with development of TG. Of 98 for cause renal allograft biopsies carried out within 3 months of transplantation with available serologic data, 17 showed C4d‐positive AMR and 16 had histologic changes of AMR and donor‐specific antibodies (DSA), but no C4d. All three ultrastructural changes were seen in 11 of 17 biopsies with C4d‐positive AMR, 8 of 16 with histologic changes of AMR and DSA but no C4d, and 0 of 65 without histologic changes of AMR and/or DSA (p < 0.0001 for both of the former groups vs. the latter). Twenty patients with positive DSA (18 with histologic changes of AMR and 11 C4d‐positive) had ≥1 follow‐up biopsy; eight developed overt TG 3.5–30 months posttransplantation. Among the 18 patients with DSA and histologic changes of AMR, 11 C4d‐positive and 7 C4d‐negative, treatment for AMR after the early biopsy significantly reduced subsequent development of overt TG.     

Re‐examination of the Lymphocytotoxic Crossmatch in Liver Transplantation: Can C4d Stains Help in Monitoring?

C4d-assisted recognition of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues (FFPE) from donor-specific antibody-positive (DSA+) renal allograft recipients prompted study of DSA+ liver allograft recipients as measured by lymphocytotoxic crossmatch (XM) and/or Luminex. XM results did not influence patient or allograft survival, or cellular rejection rates, but XM+ recipients received significantly more prophylactic steroids. Endothelial C4d staining strongly correlates with XM+ (<3 weeks posttransplantation) and DSA+ status and cellular rejection, but not with worse Banff grading or treatment response. Diffuse C4d staining, XM+, DSA+ and ABO- incompatibility status, histopathology and clinical-serologic profile helped establish an isolated AMR diagnosis in 5 of 100 (5%) XM+ and one ABO-incompatible, recipients. C4d staining later after transplantation was associated with rejection and nonrejection-related causes of allograft dysfunction in DSA- and DSA+ recipients, some of whom had good outcomes without additional therapy. Liver allograft FFPE C4d staining: (a) can help classify liver allograft dysfunction; (b) substantiates antibody contribution to rejection; (c) probably represents nonalloantibody insults and/or complete absorption in DSA- recipients and (d) alone, is an imperfect AMR marker needing correlation with routine histopathology, clinical and serologic profiles. Further study in late biopsies and other tissue markers of liver AMR with simultaneous DSA measurements are needed.     

C4d deposition in early renal allograft protocol biopsies

BACKGROUND: Deposition of the complement protein C4d in renal allograft biopsies obtained during graft dysfunction and rejection has been proposed to be a sensitive marker of antibody-mediated acute rejection. To determine the diagnostic specificity of C4d deposition, it is important to study biopsies from allografts with no evidence of dysfunction. In this study, we examined C4d deposition in protocol biopsies obtained irrespective of clinical status. METHODS: Immunohistochemistry for C4d was performed on routine protocol biopsies preimplantation and on day 7 posttransplantation from 48 unselected renal allografts. Serum samples obtained up to 1 month after transplantation were assayed for donor-reactive antibodies (DRA). Results were correlated with histopathology and clinical outcome measures. RESULTS: Diffuse C4d deposition was detected in the peritubular capillaries of 6 of 48 (13%) biopsies. C4d deposition was present in 5 of 15 (33%) biopsies that showed acute rejection (Banff 97, category 4) but only in 1 of 33 (3%) biopsies with no rejection (P=0.003, 97% specificity). Posttransplant DRAs were detected in 21 of 48 (44%) patients. All five recipients with C4d deposition and rejection had posttransplant DRA; the recipient whose biopsy showed C4d positivity, but not rejection, did not have detectable DRA. C4d deposition was not treated with plasmapheresis or intravenous immunoglobulin and was not associated with poor posttransplant graft outcome at 1-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that in early posttransplant protocol biopsies, C4d is a specific marker for the presence of humoral rejection, as indicated by its association with DRA and acute histologic rejection.     

Presentation and Outcomes of C4d‐Negative Antibody‐Mediated Rejection After Kidney Transplantation

The updated Banff classification allows for the diagnosis of antibody‐mediated rejection (AMR) in the absence of peritubular capillary C4d staining. Our objective was to quantify allograft loss risk in patients with consistently C4d‐negative AMR (n = 51) compared with C4d‐positive AMR patients (n = 156) and matched control subjects without AMR. All first‐year posttransplant biopsy results from January 2004 through June 2014 were reviewed and correlated with the presence of donor‐specific antibody (DSA). C4d‐negative AMR patients were not different from C4d‐positive AMR patients on any baseline characteristics, including immunologic risk factors (panel reactive antibody, prior transplant, HLA mismatch, donor type, DSA class, and anti‐HLA/ABO‐incompatibility). C4d‐positive AMR patients were significantly more likely to have a clinical presentation (85.3% vs. 54.9%, p < 0.001), and those patients presented substantially earlier posttransplantation (median 14 [interquartile range 8–32] days vs. 46 [interquartile range 20–191], p < 0.001) and were three times more common (7.8% vs 2.5%). One‐ and 2‐year post–AMR‐defining biopsy graft survival in C4d‐negative AMR patients was 93.4% and 90.2% versus 86.8% and 82.6% in C4d‐positive AMR patients, respectively (p = 0.4). C4d‐negative AMR was associated with a 2.56‐fold (95% confidence interval, 1.08–6.05, p = 0.033) increased risk of graft loss compared with AMR‐free matched controls. No clinical characteristics were identified that reliably distinguished C4d‐negative from C4d‐positive AMR. However, both phenotypes are associated with increased graft loss and thus warrant consideration for intervention.     

Characterization of rejection episodes in patients following positive crossmatch and ABO-incompatible live donor renal transplantation

For kidney transplant recipients with donor-specific antibody (DSA) to HLA- (+XM) or ABO-antigens (ABOI), there is a need to improve detection and treatment of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). The methods included a retrospective review of consecutive patients that received plasmapheresis and immune globulin (PPIVIg) to abrogate +XM or ABOI. Twelve patients were transplanted after PPIVIg (+XM = 9, ABOI = 2, +XM/ABOI = 1). No hyperacute rejections occurred. Rejection occurred in seven patients [four AMR, three acute cellular rejection (ACR)]. In four +XM patients, DSA was detected during graft dysfunction despite lack of histologic and C4d features of AMR. In one patient, DSA preceded the histologic and immunofluorescent features of AMR. In another patient with borderline changes and DSA, graft function improved after PPIVIg, despite lack of histologic or immunofluorescent evidence of AMR. One patient with Banff IIA ACR and DSA treated with antithymocyte antibody but not PPIVIg had recurrent rejections and poor graft function. In +XM and ABOI recipients with graft dysfunction: (i) DSA may represent AMR in the absence of C4d or histologic features of AMR; (ii) DSA can precede C4d or light microscopic features of AMR; (iii) A poor outcome may result if DSA or continued allograft dysfunction is present and not treated despite a negative biopsy.     

Study of acute antibody-mediated rejection in renal allograft biopsies

INTRODUCTION: Acute B-cell-mediated rejection (AMR) was ill-defined until the 6(th) Banff meeting establishing the criteria. We performed a retrospective analysis of renal allograft biopsies to evaluate immune injury with reference to the Ahmedabad Tolerance Induction Protocols (ATIP). METHODS: We evaluated renal allograft biopsies belonging to 3 groups: group A patients (n = 120) underwent a modified ATIP with addition of mesenchymal stem cells, anti-B-cell antibodies, and higher target-specific irradiation; group B patients (n = 351) belong to the old ATIP; and group C (n = 142) were controls who opted out of ATIP. The majority were biopsied 2 or 3 times. Biopsies were subdivided: 相似文献   

Renal allograft biopsies in the era of C4d staining: the need for change in the Banff classification system.

C4d immunostaining in the peritubular capillaries (PTC) is a marker of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). We evaluated the histopathologic diagnoses of 388 renal transplant biopsies since the implementation of routine C4d immunostaining at our center. Of these, 155 (40%) biopsies had evidence of acute cellular rejection (ACR), out of which 119 (77%) had pure ACR, 31 (20%) had ACR with concomitant features of AMR, and five (3%) had ACR with focal C4d staining. Sixty-four (16%) biopsies exhibited features of AMR [33 (52%) pure AMR, and 31(48%) concomitant AMR and ACR]. One hundred and fifty-five (40%) biopsies had features of interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (IFTA). Of these, 20 (13%) had concomitant AMR [13 (8.5%) had pure AMR and seven (4.5%) had concomitant ACR and AMR]. Creatinine at the time of biopsy was higher in patients with mixed ACR and AMR and the clinical behavior of mixed lesions is more aggressive over time. Despite having a lower serum creatinine at the time of biopsy, patients with IFTA experienced gradual decline in graft function over time. The pathologic findings in renal allograft biopsies are often mixed and mixed lesions appear to have more aggressive clinical behavior. These findings suggest the need for change in the Banff classification system to better capture the complexity of renal allograft pathologies.     

Subclinical Rejection in Stable Positive Crossmatch Kidney Transplant Patients: Incidence and Correlations

We reviewed 116 surveillance biopsies obtained approximately 1, 3, 6 and 12 months posttransplantation from 50 +XM live donor kidney transplant recipients to determine the frequency of subclinical cell-mediated rejection (CMR) and antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). Subclinical CMR was present in 39.7% of the biopsies at 1 month and >20% at all other time points. The presence of diffuse C4d on biopsies obtained at each time interval ranged from 20 to 30%. In every case, where histological and immunohistological findings were diagnostic for AMR, donor-specific antibody was found in the blood, challenging the long-held belief that low-level antibody could evade detection due to absorption on the graft. Among clinical factors, only recipient age was associated with subclinical CMR. Clinical factors associated with subclinical AMR were recipient age, positive cytotoxic crossmatch prior to desensitization and two mismatches of HLA DR 51, 52 and 53 alleles. Surveillance biopsies during the first year post-transplantation for these high-risk patients uncover clinically occult processes and phenotypes, which without intervention diminish allograft survival and function.     

Diagnostic value of C4d in renal allograft biopsies in different clinical settings: absence of C4d in grafts from non-heart-beating donors

Humoral mechanisms of rejection after kidney transplantation (TX) can be identified through the detection of diffuse complement C4d deposits in peritubular capillaries (PTC) in graft biopsies or donor-specific antibodies (DSA) in serum samples. It has been hypothesized that ischemic injury in the graft may facilitate humoral responses. Kidney grafts from non-heart-beating donors (NHBD) present more often severe ischemia lesions than grafts from heart-beating or living donors. METHODS: We reviewed kidney TX biopsies performed from May 2002 to November 2004 with special interest paid to recipients from NHBD. We checked corresponding frozen tissue for the detection of C4d in PTC using immunofluorescence with a monoclonal antibody against C4d. We also collected post-TX contemporaneous DSA data, either flow crossmatches or cytotoxic PRA. RESULTS: During this period, we performed 22 kidney TXs from NHBD of a total of 326 kidney TX (either single or combined with other grafts). Nine patients of this group underwent 12 biopsies for delayed graft function over 15 days or deteriorating scans. All biopsies showed acute tubular necrosis, but one also presented IA Banff acute rejection and another one had neutrophils in PTC. Frozen tissue from these 12 biopsies did not have diffuse C4d deposits in PTC. Serum samples of seven of nine patients were available: four had negative DSA flow crossmatches and three had 0% PRA within the same period. We diagnosed acute humoral rejection (AHR) in 13 patients-with acute renal dysfunction, C4d in biopsies and DSA after kidney TX-of 38 with high clinical suspicion for AHR. We detected C4d in seven biopsies of 30 patients performed more than 6 months after TX. CONCLUSIONS: Severe ischemic injury does not necessarily determine the activation of humoral mechanisms of rejection mediated through DSA. Therefore, C4d is extremely interesting for the identification of humoral rejection in any clinical setting after kidney TX.     

Antibody‐mediated rejection of renal allograft in combined liver–kidney transplant

Barth RN, Campos L, Kukuruga DL, Drachenberg C, Philosophe B. Antibody‐mediated rejection of renal allograft in combined liver–kidney transplant.
Clin Transplant 2009 DOI: 10.1111/j.1399‐0012.2009.01161.x
© 2009 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Abstract: Liver transplantation is performed based on ABO blood type compatibility without dependence on crossmatch results. Combined liver–kidney transplantation (CLKT) is similarly performed without dependence of crossmatch results as the liver is thought to confer protection to the renal allograft against alloantibody. We report a case of CLKT in a sensitized patient with antibody‐mediated rejection (AMR) of the renal allograft. AMR was confirmed with C4d staining and serial monitoring of donor‐specific antibody (DSA). Despite intensive therapy directed against AMR and the presence of the liver allograft, the patient demonstrated increasing titers of alloantibody, never demonstrated adequate renal function, and ultimately expired after two months. This result demonstrates the potential for AMR of the renal allograft in sensitized recipients of CLKT.     

Posttransplant De Novo Donor‐Specific HLA Antibodies Identify Pediatric Kidney Recipients at Risk for Late Antibody‐Mediated Rejection

The emerging role of humoral immunity in the pathogenesis of chronic allograft damage has prompted research aimed at assessing the role of anti‐HLA antibody (Ab) monitoring as a tool to predict allograft outcome. Data on the natural history of allografts in children developing de novo Ab after transplantation are limited. Utilizing sera collected pretransplant, and serially posttransplant, we retrospectively evaluated 82 consecutive primary pediatric kidney recipients, without pretransplant donor‐specific antibodies (DSA), for de novo Ab occurrence, and compared results with clinical–pathologic data. At 4.3‐year follow up, 19 patients (23%) developed de novo DSA whereas 24 had de novo non‐DSA (NDSA, 29%). DSA appeared at a median time of 24 months after transplantation and were mostly directed to HLA‐DQ antigens. Among the 82 patients, eight developed late/chronic active C4d+ antibody‐mediated rejection (AMR), and four C4d‐negative AMR. Late AMR correlated with DSA (p < 0.01), whose development preceded AMR by 1‐year median time. Patients with DSA had a median serum creatinine of 1.44 mg/dL at follow up, significantly higher than NDSA and Ab‐negative patients (p < 0.005). In our pediatric cohort, DSA identify patients at risk of renal dysfunction, AMR and graft loss; treatment started at Ab emergence might prevent AMR occurrence and/or progression to graft failure.     

Early elimination of cyclosporine in kidney transplant recipients receiving sirolimus prevents progression of chronic pathologic allograft lesions

Cyclosporine elimination in a regimen including sirolimus has been shown to be a safe and effective approach to improve graft function. Nevertheless, it is still unknown whether the functional benefit of CyA withdrawal coincides with a subsequent reduction in histologic lesions of chronic damage or development of chronic allograft nephropathy. This consideration would forecast a reduction in the rate of long-term graft loss. We analyzed 114 graft biopsies from a subgroup of 57 patients that had been included in a randomized study to eliminate CyA at 3 months posttransplant from a regimen including sirolimus either in group A CyA + SRL vs group B of SRL with CyA elimination at 3 months. Every patient had two biopsies, one at transplantation and another at 1 year. The biopsy reading was performed in a blinded manner by a central pathologist using the Banff 1997 and the CADI classifications. A significantly lower rate of progression of tubular and interstitial chronic lesions between basal and 1-year biopsies was observed for group B patients. In addition, the incidence of new cases of chronic allograft nephropathy during the first year was significantly lower in the group in which CyA had been eliminated at 3 months posttransplant. We conclude that early elimination of CyA in the first months posttransplant, when SRL is used as the main immunosuppressant, reduces the appearance or worsening of chronic histologic lesions, probably as a consequence of long-term CyA toxicity prevention.     

Prediction of early kidney transplant rejection by a crossmatch with donor skin

Immunofluorescence staining of donor skin with recipient serum was performed in 25 patients undergoing kidney transplantation. Transplants were performed when cytotoxicity T cell crossmatches with long incubation and with antiglobulin enhancement were negative. In 20 patients the skin crossmatch was negative and all had an uneventful course. In 5 other recipients, the crossmatch with skin was positive and all developed severe rejection 1-8 days after transplantation. The correlation between skin crossmatch and early rejection was statistically highly significant (P less than 0.00001). Rejection in the skin-crossmatch-positive group led to graft loss in 3, and chronic rejection with poor residual function in the other 2 patients. Serum creatinine at one month was in the 2.6-5.0 mg/dl range in these two patients, while in the group with negative skin crossmatches 15 had serum creatinine levels of less than 1.6, and 5 were in the 1.6-2.5 mg/dl range. Although the nature of the skin antigen is unknown, it appears that this crossmatch procedure was highly accurate in predicting early kidney transplant rejection.     

Isolated vascular “v” lesions in liver allografts: How to approach this unusual finding

According to the Banff criteria for kidney allografts, isolated vascular or “v” lesions are defined as intimal inflammation, age‐inappropriate fibro‐intimal hyperplasia, or both, without the presence of associated interstitial T cell‐mediated rejection (TCMR). In general, these lesions portend a worse outcome for kidney allografts, particularly in those where the “v” lesions are identified in patients with coexistent donor specific antibodies (DSA) or later after transplantation. Although affected arteries are rarely sampled in liver allograft biopsies, we identified nine patients at a mean of 1805 days posttransplantation and compared these to matched controls. Almost half (4 of 9) of the study patient biopsies showed inflammatory arteritis associated with focal or diffuse C4d positivity, which was not observed in matched controls. One “v” lesion patient progressed to rejection‐related graft failure and two developed moderate/severe TCMR in subsequent biopsies, whereas only one rejection episode occurred in follow‐up biopsies, and no rejection‐related deaths or graft failures were detected in controls. In conclusion, patients with liver allograft isolated “v” lesions should undergo further evaluation and closer follow‐up for impending TCMR and/or underlying co‐existent chronic antibody‐mediated rejection (AMR).     

Association between the presence of anti-HLA antibodies with acute rejection and chronic allograft nephropathy in the first year after kidney transplantation

The clinical relevance of anti-HLA antibodies following kidney transplantation has been a recent focus of research. Patients who present anti-HLA antibodies in the posttransplantation period have shown higher incidences of acute rejection episodes (ARE) and chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN). The objective of this study was to evaluate the presence of anti-HLA antibodies during the first year after kidney transplantation and their association with the occurrence of ARE and CAN. Eighty-eight kidney transplant recipients were evaluated for the presence of IgG anti-HLA antibodies using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (LAT-M and LAT-1240, One Lambda Inc, Calif, United States). Protocol kidney biopsies were performed in consenting patients. ARE and CAN were diagnosed by clinical, laboratory, and histopathological criteria. Anti-HLA antibodies were observed in 20 (22.7%) patients. At 1 year follow-up, 26.1% presented ARE and 51.2% developed CAN. Nine patients (45%) with antibodies developed ARE as opposed to 20.6% without antibodies and 64.7% developed CAN as opposed to 47.8% of those without antibodies. In the histological analysis, the anti-HLA antibodies were associated with Banff IIA ARE (P = .001) and Banff grade II CAN (P = .012). Routine posttransplantation search for antibodies may identify cases at higher risk for acute and chronic rejection, and perhaps help to tailor the immunosuppressive regimen.     

Correlation of Donor-Specific Antibodies, Complement and Its Regulators with Graft Dysfunction in Cardiac Antibody-Mediated Rejection

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is an immunopathologic process in which activation of complement often results in allograft injury. This study correlates C4d and C3d with HLA serology and graft function as diagnostic criteria for AMR. Immunofluorescence staining for C4d and C3d was performed on 1511 biopsies from 330 patients as part of routine diagnostic work-up of rejection. Donor-specific antibodies were detected in 95% of those with C4d+C3d+ biopsies versus 35% in the C4d+C3d– group (p = 0.002). Allograft dysfunction was present in 84% in the C4d+ C3d+ group versus 5% in the C4d+C3d− group (p < 0.0001). Combined C4d and C3d positivity had a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 99% for the pathologic diagnosis of AMR and a mortality of 37%. Since activation of complement does not always result in allograft dysfunction, we correlated the expression pattern of the complement regulators CD55 and CD59 in patients with and without complement deposition. The proportion of patients with CD55 and/or CD59 staining was highest in C4d+C3d− patients without allograft dysfunction (p = 0.03). We conclude that a panel of C4d and C3d is diagnostically more useful than C4d alone in the evaluation of AMR. CD55 and CD59 may play a protective role in patients with evidence of complement activation.     

SDF-1 expression is elevated in chronic human renal allograft rejection

The exact mechanism of acute and chronic allograft rejection still remains unclear. The chemokine SDF-1 as mediator of allograft rejection has been under intensive investigation in liver, cardiac and bone marrow transplantation, whereas in renal transplantation, there are no reports about SDF-1 to date. This study was performed to evaluate if SDF-1 might also play an important role in human renal graft biopsies. One hundred and ninety formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded renal allograft biopsies were included in the analysis from patients with normal renal graft morphology (according to Banff 97 classification grade 1, n = 84), with acute interstitial rejection (Banff grade 4 type I, n = 10), with acute vascular rejection (Banff grade 4 type II, n = 21), with chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN, Banff grade 5, n = 23), and without rejection but with various other lesions (Banff grade 6, n = 42). SDF-1 was localized by immunohistochemistry. In biopsies with CAN, SDF-1 expression was significantly elevated in interstitial infiltrates and infiltrating neointimal cells of arteries compared with biopsies with normal renal graft morphology. This is the first study describing a role of SDF-1 in human renal allograft rejection. We were able to demonstrate in a large number of biopsies an upregulation of SDF-1 in patients with CAN. Whether SDF-1 has pro-inflammatory or protective properties in this setting has to be evaluated in further trials.