Resection of noncolorectal nonneuroendocrine liver metastases: a comparative analysis

BACKGROUND: Although established for metastatic colorectal (CR) and neuroendocrine (NE) malignancies, the role of partial hepatectomy in management of metastases from other primaries (NCRNE) is not well-defined. STUDY DESIGN: The objective of this retrospective study is to compare outcomes after partial hepatectomy for NCRNE, NE, and CR metastases and to identify factors associated with longterm survival for patients with NCRNE diseases. Tumor characteristics, treatments, and outcomes of 360 consecutive patients undergoing resection of NCRNE (n = 82), CR (n = 245), and NE (n = 33) hepatic metastases from 1995 to 2005 were analyzed. NCRNE tumors included breast (n = 20), sarcomas (n = 19), genitourinary (n = 18), melanoma (n = 11), and other (n = 14) cancers. The start date for follow-up and survival analyses was the date of partial hepatectomy. RESULTS: For patients with NCRNE, CR, and NE tumors, there were no marked differences in postoperative mortality (4%, 4%, and 9%) or complication (30%, 42%, and 42%) rates. Median overall survival was longest for NE patients (not yet reached) versus NCRNE and CR (both 44 months) patients (p < 0.05, log-rank test). NCRNE patients had shorter disease-free survival than CR counterparts (13 versus 16 months), p < 0.05 (log-rank test). After median followup of 59 months for NCRNE patients, actuarial 5-year overall and disease-free survival was 37% and 16%, respectively, with 15 5-year survivors. Multivariable analysis suggests that interval from discovery of liver metastases to resection > 6 months (p = 0.08) and administration of chemoradiotherapy after resection (p = 0.06) might be associated with improved overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: In selected patients, resection of NCRNE liver metastases can be done safely with survival similar to CR metastases. Delay of liver resection for at least 6 months and treatment with chemoradiotherapy after resection might be associated with improved longterm survival after partial hepatectomy.     

Treatment strategy for hepatic metastases of colorectal cancer

Over the past 25 years, 125 patients with colorectal liver metastases underwent 167 hepatectomies in our department. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates after the initial hepatectomy were 90%, 58%, and 51%, respectively, and those after repeated hepatectomy were 88%, 60%, and 42%, respectively. The predictive factors significantly associated with poor prognosis after initial hepatectomy were maximal diameter of metastasis (> or = 5 cm), distribution pattern in the liver (multiple bilobar), number of nodules (> or = four), and presence of extrahepatic metastases. A disease-free interval of > 6 months after initial hepatectomy was a significant factor for prolongation of survival after repeat hepatectomy. Patients with hilar node metastases at the initial hepatectomy did not receive a survival benefit from hepatectomy, while 5 patients underwent repeat hepatectomy with lymphadenectomy for remnant liver and hilar node metastases with a disease-free interval of > 8 months and 4 of them survived for > 5 years. Our treatment strategies for colorectal hepatic metastases are as follows: 1) hepatectomy is the first choice for < 4 liver metastases without extrahepatic disease; 2) a careful evaluation for liver resection is performed for patients with > or = 4 liver metastases receiving hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy because of the high frequency of hepatic and/or extrahepatic recurrence after initial hepatectomy; 3) the presence of hilar node metastases at the initial hepatectomy should be excluded from surgical indications; 4) simultaneous single metastasis limited to the lung is an indication for lung resection; and 5) a suitable indication for repeat hepatectomy for hepatic recurrence is patients with a longer disease-free interval. Aggressive surgery based on the optimum patient selection can contribute to clinical benefit, including long-term survival in patients with colorectal liver metastases.     

Analysis of predictive factors for recurrence after hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases

Hepatectomy for liver metastases from colorectal cancer has recently received general acceptance as a safe, potentially curative treatment. Most patients, however, die of recurrent disease after hepatectomy. The predictive factors for recurrence after first resection of liver metastases have not yet been clarified. The authors aimed to determine the factors that can predict recurrence, especially hepatic-only recurrence after hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases. Seventy-six patients who underwent liver resection of colorectal metastases were studied retrospectively. Forty-seven (61.8%) of the patients had a recurrence. The patients' disease-free survival after first hepatectomy and the second recurrence sites were univariately and multivariately analyzed using 16 clinicopathologic variables. Wall invasion, lymph node metastases, lymphatic invasion, venous invasion of the primary tumor, 24 months or longer disease-free interval after resection of the primary colorectal cancer, and bilateral liver metastases significantly influenced the disease-free survival (log-rank test: p < 0.05). The multivariate analysis revealed that venous invasion of the primary tumor and bilateral hepatic metastases were independent risk factors for recurrence after hepatectomy. The liver was the only site of second recurrence in 23 patients. Patients with lymph node metastases and venous invasion of the primary tumor had a significant difference between hepatic-only and extrahepatic recurrence after first hepatectomy (chi-square test or Fishers' exact test: p < 0.05). Recurrence after hepatectomy was influenced more by factors associated with the primary colorectal cancer than factors surrounding the first liver metastases. Venous invasion of the primary colorectal cancer was the most important predictable factor for hepatic-only second recurrence.     

Hepatic resection for noncolorectal,nonneuroendocrine metastases

Resection of certain hepatic metastases of noncolorectal, nonneuroendocrine (NCNNE) origin provides actual long-term (>5 years) survival. We conducted a retrospective outcome study at a single tertiary referral institution. Between January 1988 and October 1998, 64 consecutive patients underwent resection of hepatic metastases from NCNNE primary tumors. Overall and disease-free survival rates were correlated to clinicopathologic factors and operative morbidity and mortality. Thirteen patients underwent a right hepatectomy, 6 underwent a left hepatectomy, 3 had extended right and 2 extended left hepatectomy, 2 patients had segmentectomy, 24 underwent wedge resections, and 14 underwent a combination of these forms of resection. R0 resection was achieved in 56 patients (87.5%). The operative mortality was 1.5% (1 of 64). Actual 1-, 3-, and 5-year survivals were 81%, 43%, and 30%, respectively. The factor adversely associated with overall and disease-free survival was uniformly related to the interval between primary tumor resection and the development of hepatic metastases. A 1.5% operative mortality and an actual 5-year survival of 30% justifies hepatic resection, including major hepatic resection, for certain NCNNE metastases. The factor affecting prognosis in this highly select group of patients was the biological behavior of the tumor, with tumors that metastasize earlier having poorer survival rates. Presented at the Forty-Sixth Annual Meeting of The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, Chicago, Illinois, May 14–18, 2005 (poster presentation).     

Changes in Indication and Results After Resection of Hepatic Metastases From Noncolorectal Primary Tumors: A Single-Institutional Review

Background

The isolated occurrence of noncolorectal liver metastases is rare. The available data are inconsistent in terms of indication for surgery, treatment, and outcome, so a generally applicable therapeutic algorithm is currently lacking.

Methods

A total of 162 patients underwent resection for noncolorectal liver metastases between 1978 and 2001. The patients were divided into two groups from different time periods (group 1, 1978–1989; group 2, 1990–2001) that were similar in terms of number of patients, operating surgeons, and surgical techniques used. The groups were compared, and the data were retrospectively analyzed with regard to indication, survival, and factors predictive for survival.

Results

Resection was performed to remove liver metastases from noncolorectal gastrointestinal carcinoma (n = 50), neuroendocrine tumors (n = 12), genitourinary primary tumors (n = 11), breast carcinoma (n = 24), leiomyosarcoma (n = 15), and metastases from other primary cancers (n = 50). Extrahepatic tumor involvement was seen in 38 (23%) of the 162 cases. Sixty-two (38%) major hepatectomies and 100 (62%) minor resections were performed. In 100 (62%) of 162 patients, a curative resection (R0) could be achieved. Overall 2- and 5-year survival rates of 49% and 26%, respectively, were observed, and the median survival was 23 months. Survival was significantly longer in patients who underwent an R0 resection.

Conclusions

In selected patients, resection of noncolorectal liver metastases is associated with a 5-year survival rate of up to 50%. Resection of liver metastases from gastrointestinal adenocarcinomas correlates with a poor prognosis. Extrahepatic metastases may be considered a relative contraindication for liver resection.

     

Partial hepatectomy for metastases from noncolorectal, nonneuroendocrine carcinoma

OBJECTIVE: To define perioperative and long-term outcome and prognostic factors in patients undergoing hepatectomy for liver metastases arising from noncolorectal and nonneuroendocrine (NCNN) carcinoma. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Hepatic resection is a well-established therapy for patients with liver metastases from colorectal or neuroendocrine carcinoma. However, for patients with liver metastases from other carcinomas, the value of resection is incompletely defined and still debated. METHODS: Between April 1981 and April 2002, 141 patients underwent hepatic resection for liver metastases from NCNN carcinoma. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, treatment, and postoperative outcome were analyzed. RESULTS: Thirty-day postoperative mortality was 0% and 46 of 141 (33%) patients developed postoperative complications. The median follow up was 26 months (interquartile range [IQR]) 10-49 months); the median follow up for survivors was 35 months (IQR 11-68 months). There have been 24 actual 5-year survivors so far. The actuarial 3-year relapse-free survival rate was 30% (95% confidence interval [CI], 21-39%) with a median of 17 months. The actuarial 3-year cancer-specific survival rate was 57% (95% CI, 48-67%) with a median of 42 months. Primary tumor type and length of disease-free interval from the primary tumor were significant independent prognostic factors for relapse-free and cancer-specific survival. Margin status was significant for cancer-specific survival and showed a strong trend for relapse-free survival. CONCLUSIONS: Hepatic resection for metastases from NCNN carcinoma is safe and can offer long-term survival in selected patients. Hepatic resection should be considered if all gross disease can be removed, especially in patients with metastases from reproductive tract tumors or a disease-free interval greater than 2 years.     

Hepatic resection for noncolorectal nonendocrine liver metastases: analysis of 1,452 patients and development of a prognostic model

OBJECTIVE: To determine the utility of hepatic resection (HR) in the treatment of patients with noncolorectal nonendocrine liver metastases (NCNELM). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The place of HR in the treatment of NCNELM remains controversial, primarily due to the limitations of previously published reports and the heterogeneity of primary tumor sites and histologies. METHODS: A multivariate risk model was developed by analyzing prognostic factors and long-term outcomes in 1452 patients with NCNELM treated with HR at 41 centers from 1983 to 2004. RESULTS: Hepatic metastases were solitary in 56% and unilateral in 71% (mean diameter, 50.5 mm). Extrahepatic metastases were present in 22%. The most common primary sites were breast (32%), gastrointestinal (16%), and urologic (14%). The most common histologies were adenocarcinoma (60%), GIST/sarcoma (13.5%), and melanoma (13%). R0 resection was achieved in 83% of patients with a 60-day mortality rate of 2.3% and a major complication rate of 21.5%. Tumor recurred in 67% of patients (liver, 24%; extrahepatic, 18%; both, 25%). Overall and disease-free survivals at 5 years were 36% and 21% and at 10 years were 23% and 15%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, factors associated with poor prognosis were patient age >60 years, nonbreast origin, melanoma or squamous histology, disease-free interval <12 months, extrahepatic metastases, R2 resection, and major hepatectomy (all P < or = 0.02). A prognostic model based on these factors effectively stratified patients into low-risk (0-3 points, 46% 5-year survival), mid-risk (4-6 points, 33% 5-year survival), and high-risk (>6 points, <10% 5-year survival) groups (P = 0.0001). DISCUSSION: HR for NCNELM is safe and effective, with outcomes mainly dependent on primary tumor site and histology. For individual patients, a statistical model based on key prognostic factors could validate the indication for hepatic resection by predicting long-term survivals.     

Interval Period Tumor Progression: Does Delayed Hepatectomy Detect Occult Metastases in Synchronous Colorectal Liver Metastases?

Background  Rapid remnant liver recurrence in patients with synchronous colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) is occasionally experienced after simultaneous colorectal and liver resection. We evaluated the tumor progression during interval periods to determine whether delayed hepatic resection detects occult metastases. Methods  One hundred thirty-seven patients underwent hepatectomy for synchronous CRLM. Up to 2003, 116 patients underwent simultaneous colorectal and hepatic resection. From 2004 onward, we identified 21 patients undergoing delayed hepatectomy for synchronous CRLM. The tumor progression during interval was determined by a dynamic computed tomography scan. Results  Median/mean interval between the two evaluations prior to the first and second surgery was 2/2.4 months. The median/mean number of metastases detected at each evaluation was 2/3.3 and 3/4.6, respectively. Nine of the 21 (43%) patients had new detectable metastatic lesions after reevaluation. For 11 of the 21 patients, it was necessary to reconsider planned surgical procedure which was determined prior to colorectal surgery. Hepatic disease-free survival was significantly different between patients undergoing delayed and simultaneous hepatectomy. Multivariate analysis showed that the delayed hepatectomy was a significant independent prognostic factor in hepatic disease-free survival. Conclusion  Tumor progression was recognized and occult metastases were detected after the interval reevaluation. Delayed hepatectomy may be a useful approach to reduce rapid remnant liver recurrence in synchronous CRLM.     

Surgical management of recurrence after resection of colorectal liver metastases

The optimal treatment for recurrent lesions after hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases is controversial. We report the outcome of aggressive surgery for recurrent disease after the initial hepatectomy and the influence on quality of life of such treatment. Forty-five (70%) of the 64 surviving patients developed recurrence after the initial hepatectomy for liver metastases. The determinants of hepatic recurrence were the distribution and the number of liver metastases. Twenty-eight (62%) of patients with recurrence underwent resection. A second hepatectomy was performed in 20 patients, and a third hepatectomy was done in 5 patients. Ten patients with pulmonary metastasis underwent partial lung resection on 14 occasions, while resection of brain metastases was performed in 3 patients on 5 occasions. There were no operative deaths after resection of recurrent disease. The morbidity rate was 28% after repeat hepatectomy, 21% after pulmonary resection, and 0% after resection of brain metastasis. The Karnofsky performance status (PS) after the last surgery was not significantly different from that after the initial hepatectomy. The 3- and 5-year survival rates after the second hepatectomy were 54% and 14%, respectively. The 3-and 5-year survival rates of the patients undergoing resection of extrahepatic recurrence were both 17%. The survival rate after resection of recurrent disease (n=28) was significantly better than that of patients (n=17) with unresectable recurrence (P < 0.05). For the 66 patients with colorectal liver metastases, the 5-year survival rate after initial hepatectomy was 50%. The distribution and the number of liver metastases and the presence of extrahepatic disease, as single factors, significantly affected prognosis after the initial hepatectomy. Multivariate analysis revealed that only the presence of extrahepatic metastasis and a disease-free interval of less than 6 months were independent predictors of survival after the initial and second hepatectomy, respectively. It is concluded that aggressive surgery is an effective strategy for selected patients with recurrence after initial hepatectomy. Careful selection of candidates for repeat surgery will yield increased clinical benefit, including long-term survival.     

Long-term survival after resection of pulmonary metastases from carcinoma of the breast.

Resection of isolated pulmonary metastases may yield improved survival in select patients. Between 1981 and 1991, 44 women (median age, 55 years) with a history of breast cancer underwent 47 thoracotomies with no operative deaths and only three minor postoperative complications (3/47, 6.4%). Confirmation of the metastatic origin of the lung lesion was made by direct histological comparison with the primary. Three patients had benign nodules and were excluded, and 4 patients had less than complete resection at thoracotomy. The median survival after thoracotomy of the remaining 37 patients with completely resected metastases was 47 +/- 5.5 months, and their actuarial 5-year survival was 49.5%. Patients with a disease-free interval of longer than 12 months had a longer survival (median survival, 82 +/- 6 months; 5-year survival, 57%) than patients with a disease-free interval of 12 months or less (median survival, 15 +/- 3.6 months; 5-year survival, 0%) (p = 0.004). Patients with estrogen receptor-positive status (n = 14) tended to have longer survival after resection than patients with estrogen receptor-negative status (n = 15) (median survival, 81 +/- 9 months versus 23 +/- 6 months, respectively; p = 0.098). Other clinical variables analyzed did not predict survival after thoracotomy. We conclude that resection of pulmonary metastases in patients with breast cancer can be done safely and may result in long-term survival for a substantial number of patients. Patients with a disease-free interval of longer than 12 months have an excellent prognosis after complete resection.     

Complete hepatic resection of metastases from leiohyosarcoma prolongs survival

Although liver resection has been shown to prolong survival in selected patients with metastases from colorectal cancer, the benefit for other metastatic tumors is unproved. To determine whether hepatic resection has a role in the management of metastatic leiomyosarcoma, medical records from 11 consecutive patients who underwent resection of isolated metastases from leiomyosarcoma between 1984 and 1995 were reviewed. All liver resections were for leiomyosarcomas originating in the viscera (n = 6) or retroperitoneum (n = 5). The average disease-free interval was 16 months. Five of 11 primary tumors were classified as low grade, whereas six were high grade. Hepatic resections included lobectomy or extended lobectomy (n = 4), segmentectomy and/or wedge resection (n = 5), and complex resection (n = 2). There were no operative deaths. Median survival of all patients after liver resection was 39 months. Patients who underwent complete resection of hepatic metastases (n = 6) had a significantly longer survival than those who had incomplete resections (n = 5) (P = 0.03, log-rank test). Furthermore, five of six patients who underwent complete resection are alive after hepatectomy with a median follow-up of 53 months. Therefore, in selected patients with isolated liver metastases from visceral and retroperitoneal leiomyosarcomas, complete resection of hepatic metastases results in prolonged survival. Presented in part at the Fiftieth Annual Cancer Symposium of the Society of Surgical Oncology, Chicago, Ill., March 20–23, 1997.     

Repeat hepatectomy for colorectal metastases

The utility of repeat hepatectomy for patients with colorectal metastases to the liver was sought. A complete review of the results of surgical treatment of patients having a repeat hepatectomy was presented. Then, the data on 170 patients in whom multiple clinical variables had been tabulated were selected for special study. These statistical analyses showed that there were no special clinical features present at the time of primary resection of the large bowel cancer that could distinguish these patients. There were some differences in the clinical features of these patients at the time of first and second liver resections. The disease-free interval, method of diagnosis, presence of extrahepatic disease, incidence of complete resection, and postoperative morbidity showed significant differences. The 5-year survival of the group as a whole was 32%. Only those clinical features which involved the completeness of cancer resection had a significant impact on survival. To optimize selection for a long-term survival, no extrahepatic disease should be present and the second hepatectomy should involve removal of all visible tumor. Repeat hepatectomy for colorectal metastases was thought to be justified if the patient was made clinically disease-free, because surgery remains the only potentially curative treatment. The repeat hepatectomy was relatively safe with a low morbidity and conferred a 32% long-term survival. Received for publication on Aug. 30, 1998; accepted on Nov. 2, 1998     

Hepatic Resection for Metastatic Breast Cancer: Prognostic Analysis of 34 Patients

Liver metastasis of breast cancer is considered a generalized disease, and surgical treatment is rarely discussed. Thirty-four patients who underwent 35 hepatectomies for liver metastases of breast cancer between 1985 and 2003 were analyzed. The median interval between the breast surgery and relapse in the liver was 1.9 years (0–20 years). The liver was the first site of recurrence in 25 patients. Fifteen clinicopathologic factors were evaluated using univariate and multivariate analyses to predict survival after hepatic resection. No patients died because of the surgery. The median survival was 36 months (1 month to 20 years). The overall and disease-free 5-year survival rates after hepatectomy for breast metastases were 21% and 16%, respectively. Four patients survived more than 5 years. The presence of extrahepatic recurrence prior to hepatectomy was the only significant prognostic factor according to the analyses, and the 5-year survival rate of patients without extrahepatic disease was 31%. No patient who had hilar lymph node metastasis survived more than 5 years. In the absence of extrahepatic recurrence, surgical resection of liver metastasis from breast cancer can offer an acceptable prognosis and should not be avoided in selected patients.     

Hepatic Resection for Metastatic Melanoma: Distinct Patterns of Recurrence and Prognosis for Ocular Versus Cutaneous Disease

Background Resection of melanoma metastatic to the liver remains controversial. We evaluated the efficacy of hepatic resection in patients with metastatic ocular and cutaneous melanoma and assessed factors that could affect survival after resection. Methods Forty patients with hepatic melanoma metastasis underwent resection at four major hepatobiliary centers. Clinicopathologic factors were evaluated with regard to recurrence and survival by using χ² and log-rank tests. Results The primary tumor was ocular in 16 patients and cutaneous in 24. The median disease-free interval from the time of primary tumor treatment to hepatic metastasis was the same for both groups (ocular, 62.9 months; cutaneous, 63.1 months; P = .94). Most patients underwent either an extended hepatic resection (37.5%) or hemihepatectomy (22.5%). Twenty-six patients (65%) received perioperative systemic therapy. Thirty (75.0%) of 40 patients developed tumor recurrence. The median time to recurrence after hepatic resection was 8.3 months (ocular, 8.8 months; cutaneous, 4.7 months; P = .3). Patients with primary ocular melanoma were more likely to experience recurrence within the liver (53.3% vs. 17.4%; P = .015), whereas patients with a cutaneous primary tumor more often developed extrahepatic involvement. The 5-year survival rate for patients with a primary ocular melanoma was 20.5%, whereas there were no 5-year survivors for patients with cutaneous melanoma (P = .03). Conclusions Patterns of recurrence and prognosis after resection of hepatic melanoma metastasis differ depending on whether the primary melanoma is ocular or cutaneous. Resection should be performed as part of a multidisciplinary approach, because recurrence is common.     

Results of R0 Resection for Colorectal Liver Metastases Associated With Extrahepatic Disease

Background: Extrahepatic malignant disease has always been considered an absolute contraindication to hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases. This study reports the long-term outcome and prognostic factors of patients undergoing extrahepatic disease resection simultaneously with hepatectomy for liver metastases.Methods: From January 1987 to January 2001, 75 patients underwent a complete R0 resection of extrahepatic disease simultaneously with hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases. They were inscribed in a registry and then prospectively followed up. They represented 25% of the 294 patients who underwent an R0 hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases during the same period.Results: The mortality rate was 2.7%, and morbidity was 25%. After a median follow-up of 4.9 years (range, 1.7–13.4 years), the overall 3- and 5-year survival rates were 45% and 28%, respectively. By using a Cox model, there was a significant difference in survival between patients with single versus multiple sites of extrahepatic disease. Also, the presence of more than five liver metastases was a significant parameter.Conclusions: Extrahepatic disease in colorectal cancer patients with liver metastases should no longer be considered as a contraindication to hepatectomy. However, this intended R0 resection cannot be performed in 50% of laparotomized patients, and negative prognostic factors for surgery include the presence of multiple extrahepatic disease sites or more than five liver metastases.     

Outcome After Hepatectomy for Multiple (Four or More) Colorectal Metastases in the Era of Effective Chemotherapy

Background Hepatic resection is generally accepted as the only potential for long-term survival in patients with colorectal metastases confined to the liver. Despite an unknown benefit, hepatic resection is playing an increasing role in patients with extensive disease. Methods A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained hepatobiliary surgical database was carried out. Outcome after hepatectomy for four or more colorectal hepatic metastases was reviewed. Results Between 1998 and 2002, out of a total of 584 patients, 98 (17%) with four or more colorectal hepatic metastases were resected. Actuarial 5-year survival was 33% for the entire group, with seven actual 5-year survivors. There were no perioperative deaths, and the perioperative morbidity was 28%. Positive margins and extrahepatic disease resection were independently associated with poor outcome. The median disease-free survival was 12 months, with no actuarial disease-free survivors at 5 years. Recurrence pattern, response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, time to recurrence, and resection of recurrent disease were also associated with outcome. Conclusions Long-term survival can be achieved after resection of multiple colorectal metastases; however, because most patients will experience recurrence of disease, effective adjuvant therapy and close follow-up is necessary.     

Hepatic resection of noncolorectal nonneuroendocrine metastases

Because hepatic resection is generally a safe procedure,the indications for resection of noncolorectal nonneuroendocrine (NCNNE) hepatic metastases have broadened. The prognostic features of NCNNE metastases treated surgically were reviewed to define better the value of resection. A retrospective review of patients undergoing liver resection for NCNNE metastases between 1978 and 1998 was undertaken. Thirty-seven patients were identified. Mean age was 56 years, with a median follow-up of 22 months. Primary tumor sites were grouped into gastrointestinal (GI) adenocarcinoma (small bowel, n = 4; pancreas, n = 2; esophagus, n = 1) and other (renal cell, n = 7; sarcoma, n = 7; melanoma, n = 5; adrenal, n = 3; unknown adenocarcinoma, n = 3; thyroid, n = 2; testicular, n = 1; ovarian, n = 1; breast, n = 1). All patients underwent surgery for cure. Metastases were synchronous in 14 patients. There was no surgical mortality. Overall 5-year survival rate was 45%. Five-year survival rates were better for patients with non-GI-origin metastases (60% v 0%; P = .01). Long-term survival was seen only in patients with non-GI-origin metastases. The extent of resection, presence of synchronous metastases, or disease-free interval from time of original disease to presentation with liver metastases were not predictive of outcome. We conclude that patients with NCNNE hepatic metastases can undergo liver resection with an expectation of prolonged survival. However, patients with liver metastases from GI primary tumors other than the colorectum are unlikely to show extended survival.     

Selected Patients with Metastatic Melanoma May Benefit from Liver Resection

Background In the last few years there has been expanding use of hepatic resection for non-colorectal metastases. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the experience of liver resection for patients with metastatic melanoma. Methods Eighteen patients with metastatic melanoma were explored for possible surgical resection. All patients fitted the following criteria: absence of extra-hepatic disease after evaluation with CT/MRI and FDG-PET scans; disease-free interval longer than 24 months after the resection of the primary melanoma; presumed completely resectable lesions; absence of clinical co-morbidities. Results Liver resection was performed in 10 patients; 8 out of 18 presented with irresectable tumors and/or peritoneal metastases and were not operated. One patient presented with postoperative biliary fistula and was conservatively managed. No other complications or postoperative mortality were observed. After a mean follow-up of 25.4 months, 5 patients are alive and without evidence of recurrence. Overall median survival was 22 months; overall survival and disease-free survival were 70% and 50% respectively. Conclusions Resection of liver metastases from melanoma in a selected group of patients may increase survival. Exploratory laparoscopy should be included in the preoperative armamentarium of diagnostic tools.     

Long-Term Results of Liver Resection for Non-colorectal,Non-neuroendocrine Metastases

Introduction The safety and efficacy of liver resection for colorectal and neuroendocrine liver metastases is well established. However, there is lack of consensus regarding long-term effectiveness of hepatic resection for non-colorectal, non-neuroendocrine (NCNN) liver metastases. Methods A review of prospectively collected data of patients undergoing hepatic resection for NCNN liver metastases at two tertiary referral centres in the UK and Australia was undertaken. Survival analysis was used to evaluate the clinical, demographic and operative factors associated with long-term survival. Results A total of 114 hepatic resections in 102 patients were performed between 1986 and 2006. Postoperative mortality and morbidity was 0.8% and 21.1%, respectively. At 3 and 5 years overall survival was 56.1% and 38.5%, whereas disease-free survival was 37.2% and 26.5%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, factors associated with poor overall survival were diameter of liver metastasis [<5 cm versus >5 cm: hazard ratio (HR) = 2.83, p = 0.001] and the presence of extrahepatic nodal disease (HR = 3.58, p = 0.001). The type of tumor, the presence of distant extra-hepatic metastases, tumor-free interval, number and distribution of metastases did not effect long-term survival. Conclusion These results of the present study suggest that liver resection is an effective management option in selected patients with NCNN metastases confined to the liver.     

Does Resection of Adrenal Metastases From Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Improve Survival?

Background. Metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) carries a dismal prognosis, which is minimally affected by chemotherapy. Solitary brain metastases from NSCLC have been resected with 5-year survivals of 10% to 30%. The objective of this study was to determine if resection of isolated adrenal metastases improves survival.

Methods. Isolated adrenal metastases were found in 14 patients with NSCLC. Eight patients had resection after cis-platinum-based chemotherapy, and 6 received chemotherapy alone.

Results. Median survival in the surgical group was significantly greater than that in the chemotherapy group (31 versus 8.5 months; p = 0.03). All patients in the chemotherapy group were dead by 22 months. Three-year actuarial survival in the surgical group was 38%. No difference in locoregional stage, size of adrenal metastases, patient age, or performance status was present between the two groups.

Conclusions. Long-term disease-free survival is possible after resection of isolated adrenal metastases from NSCLC. Resection of isolated adrenal metastases should be considered if the primary NSCLC is resectable.