Late steroid withdrawal after heart transplantation and incidence of acute rejection

BACKGROUND: Steroid withdrawal (SW) after heart transplantation (HT) reduces steroid-associated side effects, although it can increase acute rejection episodes (ARE). Patient selection criteria for SW and the time elapsed after HT for this maneuver are controversial issues. The objective of this study was to assess the safety of late SW after HT with regard to the occurrence of ARE and to analyze risk factors resulting in a poor evolution. METHODS: We studied a cohort of 24 patients who underwent SW late after HT. All of them had gone at least 4 years without any ARE. Independent variables were time after HT, general recipient and donor data, risk factors for ARE, and immunosuppression. The dependent variables were occurrence of ARE (proven or not proven with endomyocardial biopsy) and time and severity of ARE. RESULTS: Among 24 HT patients including 96% men with an overall mean age of 57 years who underwent SW, the mean follow-up was 2.32 +/- 0.86 years. Six patients (25%) displayed an ARE >or=2R according to the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) at 5 +/- 3 months after SW. There were no deaths. Time from the last rejection episode to SW was 6.6 +/- 2 years. All ARE were treated with steroid boluses (mean total dose 1583 +/- 1044 mg). Among the HT patients with ARE, 5 (85%) had never experienced ARE after HT. Upon long-term follow-up, there were 2 deaths: 1 sudden death at 30 months after SW and 1 due to allograft vasculopathy at 20 months post-SW. Currently 92% are New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class I with a mean left ventricular ejection fraction of 67% +/- 10%. CONCLUSIONS: In our series of HT with late SW after HT (even among an HT population with a low risk of rejection), there was a 25% rate of ARE. This study did not allow us to identify risk factors for ARE after SW. We believe that based upon these observations SW should be implemented with caution.     

Benefits derivated from late steroid withdrawal in renal transplant recipients

Because corticosteroids have adverse metabolic effects, inducing bone-mineral imbalance and contributing to infections among renal transplant recipients, many withdrawal trials have been attempted to reduce adverse events and improve quality of life. We retrospectively analyzed the safety and efficacy of late steroid withdrawal, after the first posttransplant year, among a selected group of kidney allograft recipients. In 42 low immunological risk allograft recipients, among 382 patients transplanted during a decade, corticosteroids were progressively reduced and completely withdrawn. The evolution of clinical and biochemical parameters after the withdrawal were analyzed. Corticosteroid withdrawal was performed as a mean of 52.16 +/- 28.41 months posttransplant, with subsequent follow-up without steroid treatment of 18.13 +/- 16.11 months. Comparing the most recent evaluation with the data previous to steroid withdrawal, patients showed a significant decreases in diastolic pressure (P = .039), total cholesterol (P = .000), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (P = .039), but not in triglyceride levels (P = .33). Body weight did not change (P = .77), but increased fasting glucose levels were noted (P = .03), in absence of new diagnosed diabetes mellitus. A significant reduction in cyclosporine Neoral (P = .01) or tacrolimus doses were detected (P = .01). At the last visit, serum creatinine in the whole group remained stable (P = .06). Only five patients showed an increase in serum creatinine more than 20% (from 1.44 +/- 0.41 to 1.94 +/- 0.45 mg/dL P = .04) and proteinuria did not increase (P = .94). No patient was diagnosed with a rejection episodes or required corticosteroid resumption. Graft and patient survivals were 100% at the end of follow-up. In conclusion, our data showed that late corticosteroid withdrawal in renal transplant recipients of low immunological risk is safe and is followed by an improvement in their metabolic profile and in blood pressure.     

Outcomes of acute rejection after interferon therapy in liver transplant recipients.

Interferon alfa has been increasingly used against recurrent hepatitis C (HCV) disease in post-liver transplant (LT) recipients. A serious potential adverse effect is acute rejection. We reviewed our experience using interferon-based therapy (interferon or pegylated interferon with or without ribavirin) for treating recurrent HCV in LT recipients. Forty-four LT recipients were treated with interferon for recurrent HCV. Five of the 44 patients developed acute rejection during interferon-based therapy. These 5 patients started treatment of 42.4 +/- 33.89 months (mean +/- SD) after LT. Mean (+/- SD) histological activity index and fibrosis scores before initiating antiviral therapy were 8.8 (+/- 1.92) and 2.6 (+/- 0.55), respectively. Patients were treated for 3.3 +/- 2.28 months (mean +/- SD) prior to rejection. At the time of rejection, HCV load was not detectable in 4 of the 5 recipients. All 5 patients had tolerated interferon therapy, and none had stopped therapy because of adverse effects. The rejection was successfully treated in 3 patients. In 2 of those 3 patients, cirrhosis eventually developed. In the 2 patients who did not respond to rejection treatment, immediate graft failure occurred, leading to re-LT in 1 patient and death from sepsis in the other. In conclusion, the results indicate that further studies are needed to assess the safety of interferon in LT recipients. Interferon-based therapy may lead to acute rejection and subsequent graft loss and should therefore be used with caution. Treated recipients may also develop progressive cirrhosis despite achieving a sustained virological response.     

Intermediate-term outcomes with early steroid withdrawal in African-American renal transplant recipients undergoing surveillance biopsy

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of data regarding the use of early corticosteroid withdrawal (ESW) in African-American renal allograft recipients, and very few reports with >or=1 year follow-up in all patients. METHODS: We examined the outcomes of 57 African-American renal allograft recipients with minimum follow-up 12 months who did not receive maintenance steroids after day 4 posttransplant. All patients received thymoglobulin induction, mycophenolate mofetil, and initial tacrolimus (n = 48) or sirolimus (n = 9). RESULTS: Patient and graft survival were 98% and 96% at 1 year, and 95% and 89% over the entire follow-up period (mean, 23 +/- 8 months). Incidence of acute rejection and cytomegalovirus infection were 18% and 7%, respectively, with mean serum creatinine 1.6 +/- 0.5 and 1.7 +/- 0.9 mg/dL at 6 and 12 months. Of patients with functioning grafts, 84% remained steroid free at 1 year, of which 11 (24%) were also calcineurin inhibitor free. Twenty-seven patients underwent surveillance biopsy at 1 month and 28 at 12 months, with 15 surveyed at both time points. There were significant increases in only 2 of the 6 1997 Banff chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) category scores in this subgroup, with all mean values remaining <1 (mild in severity) at 1 year. Overall, from 82% to 96% of the 12-month scores were 相似文献   

Moderate acute rejection detected during annual catheterization in pediatric heart transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Acute rejection commonly occurs within the first year after heart transplantation, and then decreases in frequency with time. Recently, the long-term utility of endomyocardial biopsy during routine annual catheterization has been questioned. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively review the prevalence of biopsy-proven rejection during routine annual catheterization in our patient population, determine whether biopsies late after transplant are useful, and identify factors that correlate with late unsuspected rejection. METHODS: Biopsy results from the annual catheterization were evaluated from 1986 to August 2000. The prevalence of moderate rejection was evaluated and compared with the patient's immunosuppressive regimen; the prevalence of late rejection; and how late rejection correlated with recipient age, number of first-year rejections and presence of sub-therapeutic cyclosporine. RESULTS: A total of 1108 biopsies were performed in 269 children with a mean follow-up of 5 +/- 3 years (median 5 years, range 1 to 11 years). Three-drug immunosuppressive therapy, including steroids, was used in 93 patients. There was a persistent 8% to 10% prevalence of moderate rejection at up to 10 years post-transplantation. Moderate rejection was more likely in patients: (1). on 3-drug immunosuppressive therapy; (2). with a recipient age >1 year; and (3). with a relatively lower cyclosporine level. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that continued surveillance of pediatric transplant patients for acute rejection is indicated for long-term follow-up.     

Higher incidence of acute rejection in renal transplant recipients with low everolimus exposure

Everolimus (EVL) has shown a potential to reduce nephrotoxicity associated with cyclosporine (CsA) while providing similar protection against rejection. We analyzed the incidence of acute rejection episodes (ARE) among 20 cadaveric renal transplant recipients treated with the combination of EVL + CsA. Immunosuppression consisted of basiliximab induction given pretransplant and on day 4 posttransplant; EVL at a starting dose of 1.5 mg/day followed by concentration control to trough levels of 3 to 8 ng/mL by day 7; CsA at a starting dose of 4 mg/kg per day and then concentration controlled with C2 monitoring (C2 500-700 ng/mL); and steroids in a tapering regimen to reach 5 mg by day 30. The overall incidence of ARE was 25%. On postoperative day 7, patients with ARE showed significantly lower mean EVL trough concentrations compared with those not experiencing ARE (NO ARE: 2.2 +/- 2.1 ng/mL vs 4.8 +/- 2.4 ng/mL) (P = .05). The CsA C2 values were close to the lower end of the target range on day 3 (583 +/- 334 ng/mL). All rejecting grafts were functioning at 3 months posttransplantations, but mean serum creatinine was higher in the ARE group (ARE 2.2 +/- 0.7 mg/dL vs 1.1 +/- 0.2 NO ARE; P = .04). In conclusion, whenever EVL is used in combination with CsA to protect kidney transplant patients against the risk of acute rejection, a threshold of 3 ng/mL must be reached in the first week posttransplantation. We suggest careful monitoring of EVL exposure and increased EVL starting doses.     

Long-term follow-up of arrhythmias in pediatric orthotopic heart transplant recipients: incidence and correlation with rejection.

BACKGROUND: Arrhythmias in adult orthotopic heart transplant (OHT) recipients are common and have been used as predictors of rejection. Because of the paucity of information in pediatric OHT recipients, the purpose of this study was to determine the incidence and correlation of arrhythmias with rejection or with coronary artery disease (CAD) in children. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records, electrocardiograms (ECGs), and 24-hour ambulatory ECGs of patients who underwent OHT from January 1984 to December 1999. We excluded arrhythmias occurring in the first 2 weeks after OHT. RESULTS: Sixty-nine patients underwent OHT, received triple-immunosuppression therapy, were discharged home, and have been followed for a mean of 4.7 years (0.3-13 years). Each patient had an average of 10 ECGs and three 24-hour ECGs. Twenty-six patients had 33 arrhythmias: sinus bradycardia (n = 9), atrial tachycardia (n = 9), ventricular tachycardia (n = 3), and Wenckebach periodicity (n = 6). Sinus bradycardia was treated with theophylline in 8 patients, and 2 required pacemakers. Atrial tachycardias (atrial flutter in 4 patients and atrial ectopic tachycardia in 5) were treated with digoxin, propranolol, or procainamide. Ventricular tachycardia was treated with mexiletine, lidocaine, and amiodarone. There were 65 episodes of rejection, 20 of which were moderate/severe (> or =3B). Only Wenckebach was associated with the presence of either rejection or CAD (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: We noted clinically significant arrhythmias in 38% of the pediatric OHT recipients. Sinus bradycardia, atrial tachyarrhythmias, and ventricular tachycardia occurred with the same frequency. Only new-onset Wenckebach periodicity was noted in the presence of either CAD or rejection. No arrhythmia was of negative predictive value for rejection or CAD. From this data, we suggest that new-onset Wenckebach prompt evaluation for rejection or CAD.     

Increased incidence of allograft rejection in stable heart transplant recipients after late conversion from mycophenolate mofetil to azathioprine.

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is a safe and effective immunosuppressive agent in kidney and liver transplantation. Preliminary studies also support its use in heart transplantation. However, the cost of MMF is substantially greater than azathioprine (AZA), the current alternative. Since the majority of rejection episodes occur within the first few months of transplantation, using MMF early after transplantation and subsequently converting to AZA, after the risk of rejection has diminished, might be cost-effective. In order to evaluate the safety of such a strategy in heart transplant recipients, we reviewed the rejection profiles of a group of patients who were converted from MMF to AZA late after transplantation. Forty-three stable patients on chronic MMF therapy as part of an open-label, long-term safety study were converted to either commercially available MMF (CellCept) or AZA, at the conclusion of the study. Demographic variables, rejection histories before and after conversion, and immunosuppressive regimens were examined. Twenty-three patients were continued on commercial MMF and 20 were converted to AZA therapy. The average duration of MMF therapy prior to conversion was 41 months in each group. Baseline demographics were similar in the two groups. Treated allograft rejection occurred in 10 of 20 patients converting to AZA, as compared to only 1 of 23 patients remaining on MMF; p = 0.002. Additionally, mean scores (1-5 scale) for the three biopsies before and after conversion favored continued MMF therapy (1.5+/-0.6 before and 1.2+/-0.4 after conversion in MMF group vs. 1.3+/-0.5 before and 1.7+/-0.9 after conversion to AZA; p = 0.02). No allograft loss occurred as a result of conversion. These data suggest that conversion from MMF to AZA, even late after transplantation, can be associated with allograft rejection. The costs associated with these rejection episodes (the additional immunosuppressive agents, endomyocardial biopsies, and physician visits) may exceed the potential cost savings of converting stable heart transplant recipients from MMF to AZA.     

Impact of acute rejection therapy on infections and malignancies in renal transplant recipients

BACKGROUND: Infections and malignancies are important causes of mortality and morbidity in renal allograft recipients. Their risk increases with increasing immunosuppression. METHODS: In an attempt to quantitate the increase in the risk of these complications in association with antirejection therapy, we reviewed the records of all renal allograft recipients of our center transplanted during the cyclosporin era. We sub-divided the patients into three groups based on acute rejection episodes during the first 6 months posttransplant, and the treatment for acute rejection: those who did not develop AR--group 1 (n=168); those who had one or more episodes of acute rejection and were treated with high dose corticosteroids --group 2 (n=169); those who in addition to corticosteroids required cytolytics (OKT3) and/or other drugs--group 3 (n=141). RESULTS: 52% patients in group 1, 71% patients in group 2 and 86% patients in group 3 had one or more episodes of infection during the first 6 months posttransplantation. Relative risk for group 2 and 3 were 1.56 (P=0.0002) and 2.98 (P<0.00001), respectively. Infection/patient rates at 6 months were 0.67, 1.23, and 2.79 in groups 1, 2, and 3 respectively. Groups 1 and 2 had a similar number of cases with squamous and basal cell carcinoma, however, there were few cases with these malignancies in group 3. No case of lymphoma was seen in group 1; there were four cases in group 2 and nine in group 3. There was no significant difference in patient survival in group 1 and 2, however, patients in group 3 had a reduced patient survival (1 vs. 3 P<0.001, 2 vs. 3 P=0.067). Graft survival was best in group 1 and worst in group 3 (1 vs. 2 P<0.05; 1 vs. 3 P<0.00001; 2 vs. 3 P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In renal transplant recipients the risk of infections and lymphoma increases with increasing immunosuppression and hence mortality and morbidity associated with it. When adding a potent immunosuppressive agent to rescue a kidney one needs to consider the serious and at times fatal side effects given the modest beneficial effect on long-term outcome.     

Antithymocyte globulin for steroid resistant rejection in renal transplant recipients immunosuppressed with triple therapy

Steroid resistant rejection, confirmed histologically, occurred in 35 of 187 consecutive cadaveric renal transplants treated with triple therapy (cyclosporin, azathioprine and prednisolone) in the Oxford Transplant Unit. Twenty-seven of these were treated with a rabbit antithymocyte globulin (ATG) and 19 showed recovery of function. The level of serum creatinine, the renal biopsy appearance and the requirement for dialysis at the start of ATG treatment did not predict which patients would respond to the therapy. One year after transplantation there was no significant difference between the mean plasma creatinine levels of those patients with steroid resistant rejection who had been given ATG and responded (151.6 μmol/l) and those who had responded to steroids alone (165.0 μmol/l). Adverse effects of ATG treatment included a mean fall in white cell count of 62.2% and a mean fall in platelet count of 45.1%. Two of the 27 patients who received ATG died (7.4% mortality). ATG would appear to be an effective treatment of steroid resistant rejection in patients receiving triple therapy immunosuppression, and graft function may subsequently be excellent in those patients who respond to treatment.     

Rapid steroid withdrawal in hepatitis C virus-positive kidney transplant recipients

The effects of rapid steroid withdrawal (SW) on kidney transplantation (KT) outcome were investigated in 12 HCV+ patients in a prospective cohort study. These results were compared with 17 HCV+ patients who received KT in the prior 2 yr and treated with a standard prednisone taper protocol. SW patients received only 6 d of steroid treatment after transplantation. Eleven received Thymoglobulin and one Basiliximab induction treatment along with a calcineurin inhibitor and mycophenolate mofetil. Patient and graft survival was 92% in SW group (median follow-up 12 months, range 6-17), and 92 and 82% in the historic control group respectively (median follow-up 21 months, range 11-27). In the SW and control group, acute rejection rates were 9 and 18%, and mean creatinine levels at last follow-up 1.30 +/- 0.36 and 1.68 +/- 0.58 mg/dL respectively. Only two SW patients had an increase in liver function tests during follow-up (18%), compared with six patients in the control group (43%). This study demonstrates that rapid SW is safe for HCV+ KT recipients, without an increase in acute rejection episodes or liver function abnormalities in the short term.     

Delayed acute rejection episodes in cyclosporine-treated renal transplant recipients.

Of 109 cyclosporine-treated cadaveric renal allograft recipients, 45 were free of acute rejection in the first 4 weeks after transplantation. Eleven of 45 (24%) subsequently had delayed, biopsy-proven first rejection episodes 34-61 days after grafting, often after discharge from the hospital. Delayed rejectors had significantly higher plasma creatinine levels at all times during the first posttransplant month than 34 nonrejectors. Trough serum cyclosporine levels were similar in the two groups, although by the 4th week oral cyclosporine dose was significantly lower in the delayed rejection group. Two-thirds of those patients who had serum creatinine levels greater than or equal to 260 mumol/l at 2 weeks and greater than or equal to 225 mumol/l at 3 weeks had a delayed acute rejection episode. Renal transplant recipients treated with cyclosporine who have serum creatinine levels at or above these levels should be aggressively worked up and closely followed for the development of delayed acute rejection.     

Comparing early withdrawal or avoidance of steroids with standard steroid therapy in kidney transplant recipients

This Practice Point commentary discusses the findings and limitations of an open-label, multicenter, prospective trial conducted by Vincenti et al., in which kidney transplant recipients receiving basiliximab, ciclosporin microemulsion, and enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium were randomized to standard corticosteroid therapy, steroid withdrawal 7 days after transplantation, or complete steroid avoidance. The trial failed to show noninferiority of the steroid-sparing arms in terms of calculated glomerular filtration rate at 12 months. In addition, the steroid-sparing groups had an increased cumulative incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection at 12 months. This commentary highlights the issues to consider when interpreting and generalizing these results, including the under-representation of African Americans in the study population, the short duration of follow-up, and the switching of some patients between steroid-containing and steroid-sparing immunosuppressive regimens. The benefits of steroid-free immunosuppression versus low maintenance doses of steroids in kidney transplant recipients remain unclear.