Salvage therapy with thalidomide in multiple myeloma patients relapsing after autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The introduction of high-dose therapy with stem cell support has significantly improved the outcome of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) in terms of increased complete remission (CR) rate and extended survival, both disease-free and overall. Few options, however, are presently available for patients who relapse after single or double autologous stem cell transplantation (SCT). Thalidomide, a glutamic acid derivative with anti-angiogenetic properties, has been recently proposed as salvage treatment for such patients. The present study was aimed at evaluating thalidomide as single agent therapy for patients who had previously received autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. DESIGN AND METHODS: From October 1999 to August 2000, 11 patients (7 males/4 females) who had relapsed after single (n = 4) or double (n = 7) autologous peripheral blood SCT were enrolled in the trial. Thalidomide, always employed as a single agent, was initially administered at a dose of 100 mg/day; if well tolerated, the dose was increased serially by 200 mg every other week to a maximum of 800 mg/day. RESULTS: The median administered dose was 600 mg/day. WHO grade > II toxic effects were constipation, lethargy, and leukopenia. Four patients (36%) showed > 50% reduction in serum M protein concentration and 4 showed > 25% reduction, for a total response rate averaging 72%. After a median follow-up of 5 months, 3 out of 8 responding patients are alive and progression-free and 5 patients have relapsed. INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS; These data confirm that thalidomide is active in poor-prognosis MM patients such as those relapsing after autologous SCT, and could thus deserve further testing in combination therapy.     

Monotherapy with low-dose thalidomide for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: better response rate with earlier treatment

BACKGROUND: Thalidomide is an immunomodulatory drug used in the treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM). The optimal dosing regimen of thalidomide is not known. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analysed the overall response rate and response duration of 53 patients with relapsed MM who received thalidomide in a median dose of 100 mg daily. The aim of the study was to compare the response rates of thalidomide given as the second-line treatment to those of thalidomide given as the third-line therapy. RESULTS: Of 33 patients receiving thalidomide as second line, 13 (39%) had overall treatment response. Of 20 patients treated with thalidomide monotherapy as the third-line treatment, there were three treatment responses (15%) (P = 0.039). The median duration of treatment response in the second-line thalidomide group (12 months, range 6-60 months) was twice as long as that in the third-line thalidomide group (6 months, range 3-57 months), although the difference was not statistically significant, probably due to low number of patients. Only 6% of patients (3/53) had to stop the treatment because of toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Monotherapy with low-dose thalidomide results in treatment responses in approximately 30% of patients with advanced MM. The response rate appears to be higher if thalidomide treatment is started after the first relapse or progression in comparison with the second relapse or progression. Treatment toxicity is acceptable even with prolonged exposure to the drug.     

Neurological toxicity of long-term (>1 yr) thalidomide therapy in patients with multiple myeloma

OBJECTIVE: Thalidomide is remarkably active in advanced relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (MM), so that its use has been recently proposed either in newly diagnosed patients or as maintenance treatment after conventional or high-dose therapy. This latter therapeutic approach has risen the concern of side-effects of long-term therapy with this drug. METHODS: We analysed long-term toxicity of 40 patients (27 M, 13 F, median age = 61.5 yr) who received salvage therapy with thalidomide +/- dexamethasone for longer than 12 months (median 15, range 12-44) at our centre. All the patients had achieved at least a stable disease upon treatment with thalidomide alone (200-400 mg/d, n = 20) or thalidomide (200 mg/d) and dexamethasone (40 mg/d for 4 d every 4 wk) (n = 20). RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Neurotoxicity was the most troublesome and frequent toxic effect that was observed after long-term treatment, the incidence averaging 75%. Among these 30 patients symptoms included paraesthesias, tremor and dizziness. Neurotoxicity was grade 1 in six patients (15%); grade 2 in 13 patients (32.5%), thus determining thalidomide dose reduction to 100 mg/d; and grade 3 in 11 patients (27.5%) who had subsequently to interrupt therapy despite their response. Electromyographic study, performed in patients with grade >/=2 neurotoxicity, revealed a symmetrical, mainly sensory peripheral neuropathy, with minor motor involvement. The severity of neurotoxicity was not related to cumulative or daily thalidomide dose, but only to the duration of the disease prior to thalidomide treatment, although no patients presented neurological symptoms at study entry. These results suggest that long-term thalidomide therapy in MM may be hampered by the remarkable neurotoxicity of the drug, and that a neurological evaluation should be mandatory prior to thalidomide treatment, in order to identify patients at risk of developing a peripheral neuropathy.     

Thalidomide alone or in combination with dexamethasone in patients with advanced, relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma and renal failure

Salvage therapy of patients with advanced, relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (MM) is often limited by poor marrow reserve and multi-organ impairment. In particular, renal failure occurs in up to 50% of such patients, and this further limits the use of conventional chemotherapy. Thalidomide, both alone and in combination with dexamethasone, has been demonstrated to be useful in patients with advanced MM, as responses could be achieved in 30-60% of the cases. From May 2000 to November 2003, 20 consecutive MM patients (15 males, five females, median age 66.5 yr) with stage III relapsed/refractory MM and renal failure, defined as serum creatinine >130 mmol/L, gave their informed consent to be enrolled in a clinical trial aimed at evaluating the efficacy and the toxic effects of thalidomide. Three patients were undergoing chronic haemodialysis during the time of entry in the study. Eight patients have been treated with thalidomide as a single agent, at a starting dose of 100 mg/d, that was to be increased to 400 mg/d in case of good tolerance. Twelve patients have been treated with thalidomide at the maximum dose of 200 mg/d plus dexamethasone 40 mg/d for four consecutive days every 4 wk. A >50% decrease in serum or urine M component was observed in nine patients (45%), seven of whom have been treated with thalidomide + dexamethasone and three with thalidomide alone. Six additional patients achieved a minor response (>25% paraprotein decrease); the total response rate was thus 75%. Median response duration was 7 months (range 2-24 months). Four patients were refractory to treatment. Recovery of a normal renal function was observed in 12 of 15 responsive patients, two additional patients, in chronic haemodialysis, showed a reduction of serum creatinine. Toxicity profile of thalidomide with or without dexamethasone was comparable with that observed in patients with a normal renal function. In conclusion, our data show that thalidomide can be safely administered in patients with advanced MM and renal failure.     

Combined thalidomide and cyclophosphamide treatment for refractory or relapsed multiple myeloma patients: a prospective phase II study

Thalidomide is an effective agent for patients with refractory multiple myeloma (MM) with a response rate of 30–40% at doses of 200–800 mg but with considerable side effects. We questioned whether lower doses of thalidomide in combination with a daily dose of cyclophosphamide might be an effective regimen with fewer side effects. We included 38 patients with relapsed or refractory MM. The median doses of thalidomide and cyclophosphamide were 100 and 95 mg/day, respectively. Side effects were observed in all patients, with neurotoxicity as the most troublesome. With a median follow-up of 14 months 84% of the patients responded, including 64% partial responses. The median time of progression-free survival was 30 months and the median overall survival time was 20 months. In conclusion, the results demonstrate that the combination of low-dose thalidomide with a daily dose of cyclophosphamide is an effective regimen with a high overall response rate and manageable side effects.This work is financially supported by research funding from the KWF (Dutch Cancer Society)Conflict of interest: There are no financial and personal relationsships with other people or organisations that could inappropriately influence (bias) our work.     

Therapy with thalidomide in refractory multiple myeloma patients - the revival of an old drug

We have treated 17 refractory or relapsed multiple myeloma patients resistant to chemotherapy with thalidomide at a dose of 200-800 mg/day. Eleven patients responded, five of whom had a very good partial response (> 75% decline in M protein) and another five exhibited a partial response (> 50% decline in M protein). Except for one patient, treatment was well tolerated with only mild side-effects. Thalidomide should be included in the therapeutic options for refractory myeloma.     

Long-term results of thalidomide in refractory and relapsed multiple myeloma with emphasis on response duration

OBJECTIVE: Thalidomide administered as a single agent produces a response rate of about 40% in patients with refractory or relapsed multiple myeloma (MM). The aim of our study was to determine the quality and duration of such responses. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-two consecutive patients with refractory (20) or relapsed (22) MM were given thalidomide as a single agent at our institution. Most of them (70%) had previously received two or more lines of therapy, and 38% had undergone autologous stem cell transplantation. RESULTS: Eighteen patients (43%) responded to thalidomide [11 minimal responses (MR) and seven partial responses (PR)] according to the European Marrow Transplant Registry (EBMT) criteria. The median time to response was 3 months and the median duration of therapy in responding patients was 9 months. Treatment was discontinued because of toxicity in 10 responding patients. The toxicity mainly led to peripheral neuropathy and fatigue. At the time of this analysis, all responding patients had progressed except one who remains in continued stable PR. The median time to progression was 15.6 months (range 1.3 to 70+), with a trend towards a longer duration for patients who achieved PR vs. MR (21.2 vs. 11.2 months, P = 0.11). The median duration of response was 12.4 months (range: 0.3-67+) (17.2 months for PR vs. 9.7 months for MR, P = 0.11). CONCLUSION: These results show that the effect of thalidomide in refractory/relapsed MM can be sustained, particularly in patients who achieve a greater degree of response, and support the finding that this drug can be used for maintenance therapy.     

Low-dose thalidomide plus dexamethasone is an effective salvage therapy for advanced myeloma

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The immunomodulatory drug thalidomide can inhibit angiogenesis and induce apoptosis in experimental models. It can also induce marked and durable response in advanced myeloma patients. Thalidomide has been used at doses ranging from 200 to 800 mg with significant toxicity. No data are available on the impact of low-dose thalidomide plus dexamethasone as salvage therapy for relapsed patients. DESIGN AND METHODS: To address this issue, myeloma patients were treated with 100 mg/day thalidomide continuously and dexamethasone 40 mg, days 1-4, every month. Between June 1999 and August 2000, 77 patients (median age 65 years) who had relapsed or were refractory to chemotherapy were treated with thalidomide plus dexamethasone. RESULTS: After a minimum of 3 months of treatment, 14 patients (18%) showed a myeloma protein reduction of 75%-100%, 18 patients (23%) showed a response of 50-75%, 19 patients (25%) a response of 25-50% and 26 patients (34%) a response of < 25% or disease progression. After a median follow-up of 8 months, median progression-free survival was 12 months. Thalidomide was well tolerated. Constipation (12%) and sedation (6%) were mild. Tingling or numbness were present in 17% of patients, discontinuation of treatment was required in 10% of patients. INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS: The association of low-dose thalidomide plus dexamethasone is active against advanced myeloma. A significant proportion of patients benefit from this treatment as a salvage therapy postponing the delivery of chemotherapy.     

Combined bendamustine, prednisolone and thalidomide for refractory or relapsed multiple myeloma after autologous stem-cell transplantation or conventional chemotherapy: results of a Phase I clinical trial

Thalidomide is an effective agent for advanced refractory or relapsed multiple myeloma (MM), although dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) may limit its use. This Phase I study found that a combination of low-dose thalidomide with bendamustine and prednisolone (BPT) maintained or increased efficacy, whilst avoiding DLT in 28 patients with MM that was refractory or that had relapsed after conventional chemotherapy or high-dose therapy with stem-cell support. BPT comprised fixed doses of bendamustine (60 mg/m(2)) and prednisolone (100 mg), and escalating doses of thalidomide (50, 100, 200 mg). Treatment cycles were repeated every 28 d until the occurrence of maximum response, DLT, or disease progression. Twenty-four patients responded after at least two cycles (four complete remission, six very good partial remission, 14 partial remission). Median progression-free and overall survival for all patients was 11 and 19 months respectively. Only mild/moderate non-haematological side effects were observed and no patient developed dose-limiting haematotoxicity. Transient grade 3-4 neutropenia was reported in 12 patients, and grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia occurred in two patients. We conclude that BPT therapy was well tolerated in patients with relapsed or refractory MM, with a response rate higher than 80%. The maximum tolerated dose of thalidomide was not reached in this study.     

Reduction of leukocyte count is associated with thalidomide response in treatment of multiple myeloma

Fifty Taiwanese patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (MM) were treated with thalidomide on a dose-escalation schedule, commencing with 100 mg/d nightly and incremented either to the maximally tolerated dose or 800 mg/d. Twenty-two patients (44%) responded, with 10 (45.5%) classified as partial remission and 12 (54.5%) minimal response (MR). Complete response did not occur. Of the 28 non-responders, 14 were progressive disease and 14 stable. The median time from commencement of thalidomide treatment to initial achievement of MR was 29 days (range, 8~155), and the corresponding thalidomide dose was 200 mg/d (range, 100~500). The median tolerated dose of thalidomide for the entire sample was 400 mg/d (range, 100~800), with only two (4%) able to tolerate 800 mg/d. Comparing responsive and non-responsive patients, statistically significant differences were not demonstrated for any characteristics except for CRP level and percentage cytogenetic change, which was slightly higher in the latter group relative to the former. Of particular interest, 18 of the 22 responders experienced transient reduction of leukocyte count preceding the attainment of significant reduction in M-proteins in comparison to only four of the 28 non-responders (82% vs. 14%; p<0.001). The median time from commencement of thalidomide treatment to attainment of minimal leukocyte count was 28 days (range, 7~150), with a mean of 2.19×10⁹/l (range, 0.96~3.35×10⁹/l). Leukopenia was generally transient, with rapid recovery despite subsequent continuation of thalidomide. Levels of other non-hematologically adverse effects attributed solely to thalidomide were generally acceptable. For 25 patients, thalidomide treatment was supplemented with low-dose dexamethasone (4 mg, every other day). Of these, 11 had relapsed from and 14 were primarily refractory to thalidomide treatment. Nine of the 25 dexamethasone-supplemented patients were responders (36%). Of particular note were the unusual events noted with this thalidomide-dexamethasone combination, including vascular thrombosis, acute cholecystitis, idiopathic interstitial lung disease and sudden cardiac death. Our results suggest that thalidomide is also effective for Taiwanese patients with refractory and/or relapsed MM. Importantly, the transient reduction in leukocyte count after commencement of thalidomide treatment may serve as a clinical predictor for response. Adverse effects should be carefully monitored when combining thalidomide and dexamethasone, however.     

Thalidomide salvage therapy following allogeneic stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma: a retrospective study from the Intergroupe Francophone du Myélome (IFM) and the Société Française de Greffe de Moelle et Thérapie Cellulaire (SFGM-TC)

Thalidomide is effective in multiple myeloma (MM), even in patients who have relapsed after high-dose therapy. A potent graft-versus-myeloma (GVM) effect can be induced against MM after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT). In all, 31 MM patients received thalidomide as a salvage therapy after progression following allo-SCT. The median maximum daily dose of thalidomide was 200 mg (range, 50-600). Thalidomide had to be discontinued in six patients (19%) because of toxicity. In all, nine patients (29%; 95% CI, 13-45) achieved an objective response with thalidomide therapy (six partial and three very good partial responses, VGPR). Five patients developed graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after thalidomide therapy, including the three patients achieving a VGPR. These data demonstrate that thalidomide is potentially effective in MM patients failing allo-SCT.     

Thalidomide in multiple myeloma: lack of response of soft-tissue plasmacytomas

Thalidomide is active in patients with refractory myeloma. Seventeen patients (nine men/eight women, median age 73 years) with multiple myeloma (MM) were treated with thalidomide. Fifteen patients had refractory disease and two untested relapse. The median dose of thalidomide was 500 mg (range, 200-800 mg). Nine of the 17 patients (53%) responded. The response rate was significantly higher in patients with no extramedullary disease than in those with soft tissue masses (75% CI: 43-95% versus 0%; P = 0.01)). Of note, no decrease in the size of soft tissue plasmacytomas was observed in all the five patients who had extramedullary involvement. This data suggests that the mechanism of action and effectiveness of thalidomide might depend on the site of the tumour cells.     

Thalidomide versus dexamethasone for the treatment of relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma: results from OPTIMUM, a randomized trial

Background

Thalidomide has potent antimyeloma activity, but no prospective, randomized controlled trial has evaluated thalidomide monotherapy in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.

Design and Methods

We conducted an international, randomized, open-label, four-arm, phase III trial to compare three different doses of thalidomide (100, 200, or 400 mg/day) with standard dexamethasone in patients who had received one to three prior therapies. The primary end-point was time to progression.

Results

In the intent-to-treat population (N=499), the median time to progression was 6.1, 7.0, 7.6, and 9.1 months in patients treated with dexamethasone, and thalidomide 100, 200, and 400 mg/day, respectively; the difference between treatment groups was not statistically significant. In the per-protocol population (n=465), the median time to progression was 6.0, 7.0, 8.0, and 9.1 months, respectively. In patients who had received two or three prior therapies, thalidomide significantly prolonged the time to progression at all dose levels compared to the result achieved with dexamethasone. Response rates and median survival were similar in all treatment groups, but the median duration of response was significantly longer in all thalidomide groups than in the dexamethasone group. Adverse events reported in the thalidomide groups, such as fatigue, constipation and neuropathy, confirmed the known safety profile of thalidomide.

Conclusions

Although thalidomide was not superior to dexamethasone in this randomized trial, thalidomide monotherapy may be considered an effective salvage therapy option for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, particularly those with a good prognosis and those who have received two or three prior therapies. The recommended starting dose of thalidomide monotherapy is 400 mg/day, which can be rapidly reduced for patients who do not tolerate this treatment. (Clinical trial registration number: {"type":"clinical-trial","attrs":{"text":"NCT00452569","term_id":"NCT00452569"}}NCT00452569)     

Safety and efficacy of pomalidomide,dexamethasone and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma

Immunomodulatory drugs including thalidomide, lenalidomide (LEN) and pomalidomide (POM), are effective for treating multiple myeloma (MM). POM has shown enhanced efficacy with dexamethasone (DEX). Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) with bortezomib is US Food and Drug Administration‐approved for treating MM. PLD with LEN or thalidomide has shown efficacy for MM patients. LEN with DEX, PLD and bortezomib achieves high response rates. We evaluated the combination of POM with DEX 40 mg and PLD 5 mg/m² with the latter two drugs administered on days 1, 4, 8 and 11 on a 28‐day cycle for the treatment of relapsed/refractory MM patients. During Phase 1, the maximum tolerated dose of POM was 4 mg, and was used in Phase 2, which also required patients to be refractory to LEN. However, neutropenia ≥ grade 3 was observed in 10/17 (59%) patients, and the dose was lowered to 3 mg. Median PFS was 5·4 months (range, 0·3–29·0 +  months). Overall response rates for patients in Phase 2 were 39% and 31% among subjects receiving POM at 3 mg and 4 mg, respectively, and clinical benefit rates were 51% and 44%, respectively. POM, PLD and DEX is a treatment option for relapsed/refractory MM patients including those who are refractory to LEN.     

Immunomodulatory drug CC-5013 overcomes drug resistance and is well tolerated in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma

Thalidomide (Thal) can overcome drug resistance in multiple myeloma (MM) but is associated with somnolence, constipation, and neuropathy. In previous in vitro studies, we have shown that the potent immunomodulatory derivative of thalidomide (IMiD) CC-5013 induces apoptosis or growth arrest even in resistant MM cell lines and patient cells, decreases binding of MM cells to bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs), inhibits the production in the BM milieu of cytokines (interleukin-6 [IL-6], vascular endothelial growth factor [VEGF], tumor necrosis factor-alpha [TNF-alpha]) mediating growth and survival of MM cells, blocks angiogenesis, and stimulates host anti-MM natural killer (NK) cell immunity. Moreover, CC-5013 also inhibits tumor growth, decreases angiogenesis, and prolongs host survival in a human plasmacytoma mouse model. In the present study, we carried out a phase 1 CC-5013 dose-escalation (5 mg/d, 10 mg/d, 25 mg/d, and 50 mg/d) study in 27 patients (median age 57 years; range, 40-71 years) with relapsed and refractory relapsed MM. They received a median of 3 prior regimens (range, 2-6 regimens), including autologous stem cell transplantation and Thal in 15 and 16 patients, respectively. In 24 evaluable patients, no dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was observed in patients treated at any dose level within the first 28 days; however, grade 3 myelosuppression developed after day 28 in all 13 patients treated with 50 mg/d CC-5013. In 12 patients, dose reduction to 25 mg/d was well tolerated and therefore considered the maximal tolerated dose (MTD). Importantly, no significant somnolence, constipation, or neuropathy has been seen in any cohort. Best responses of at least 25% reduction in paraprotein occurred in 17 (71%) of 24 patients (90% confidence interval [CI], 52%-85%), including 11 (46%) patients who had received prior Thal. Stable disease (less than 25% reduction in paraprotein) was observed in an additional 2 (8%) patients. Therefore, 17 (71%) of 24 patients (90% CI, 52%-85%) demonstrated benefit from treatment. Our study therefore provides the basis for the evaluation of CC-5013, either alone or in combination, to treat patients with MM at earlier stages of disease.     

Thalidomide plus oral melphalan compared with thalidomide alone for advanced multiple myeloma

Thalidomide, the prototype of a new class of agents active against multiple myeloma (MM), exerts synergistic/additive effects when combined with other drugs. The aim of this study was to compare the toxicity and efficacy of thalidomide alone and in combination with oral melphalan. Patients with advanced MM received 100 mg/day oral thalidomide escalated weekly up to 600 mg/day (n=23; T group), alone or with 0.20 oral mg/kg/die melphalan administered monthly for four consecutive days (n=27; TM group). A>/=50% paraprotein reduction was observed in 59% of TM compared with 26% of T patients (P=0.009); three TM patients were found to have an absence of paraprotein by immunofixation. After a median follow-up of 13 months (range 6-32), progression-free survival (PFS) at 2 years was significantly longer in the TM group (61 versus 45%; P=0.0376), whereas overall survival did not differ significantly. Toxicity was not significantly greater with the combination therapy; although DVT was more frequent (11 versus 4%), as was grade 3 leukopenia (30 versus 13%; P=0.073), there were no cases of severe infection. Thalidomide administered with oral melphalan improved response rates and PFS in patients with advanced MM without significantly increasing severe toxicity.     

Multicenter phase 2 trial of thalidomide in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: adverse prognostic impact of advanced age

Relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma has a poor outlook. Some patients respond to thalidomide; however, criteria for predicting response have not been conclusively identified. We initiated a prospective multicenter phase 2 trial in patients with relapsed/refractory myeloma using thalidomide up to the maximum dose, 800 mg/d. Interferon-alpha-2B (1.5-3.0 x 10(6) U, subcutaneously, 3 times per week) was added at week 12 if disease was responsive or stable. Patients intolerant of interferon continued thalidomide alone. Thalidomide with or without interferon was continued until disease progression. Objectives were to determine toxicity, response rate (RR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) and to elucidate relevant prognostic factors. We enrolled 75 patients, with median age 64 years (range, 36-83 years). Median individual maximum-tolerated dose of thalidomide was 600 mg/d; 41% reached 800 mg/d. Overall RR was 28%, and 55% stable disease (SD). The only predictor for response was age 65 years or younger (38% versus 17%; P =.043). At 18 months median follow-up, the actuarial median PFS and OS were 5.5 and 14.6 months, respectively. Multivariate analysis for OS demonstrated age exceeding 65 years (median, 9.2 months versus longer than 26 months; P =.011), raised serum lactate dehydrogenase (P =.002), and raised serum creatinine (P =.007) predicted inferior outcomes. Nineteen patients received interferon. Ten discontinued owing to toxicity. Four of 12 patients who received interferon for longer than 4 weeks were converted from SD to partial response. Our findings confirm substantial activity of thalidomide in relapsed/refractory myeloma. Interferon may improve response in selected patients, but is often not tolerated. The inferior outcome demonstrated in those with the identified prognostic factors is important in planning management for such patients.     

A systematic review of phase II trials of thalidomide/dexamethasone combination therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma

Thalidomide monotherapy in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM) has a response rate of 30%. The combination of thalidomide with dexamethasone (Thal/Dex) is expected to improve responses, but it is unknown if the combination increases the rate of adverse events. Here, we conducted a systematic review of studies evaluating Thal/Dex in relapsed/refractory MM. Twelve studies were included, comprising 451 patients. The response rate (CR and PR) was 46% (95% CI 42-51%). Therapy-related toxicity was comparable to thalidomide monotherapy and included somnolence (26%, 95% CI 22-31%), constipation (37%, 95% CI 32-42%) and peripheral neuropathy (27%, 95% CI 23-32%). Only venous thromboembolism appeared to occur more often with Thal/Dex (5%, 95% CI 3-8%). Thus, using Thal/Dex results in an improved response rate in relapsed/refractory MM, with a toxicity rate comparable to thalidomide monotherapy.     

Frequent good partial remissions from thalidomide including best response ever in patients with advanced refractory and relapsed myeloma

Twenty-three patients with advanced and heavily pretreated myeloma were treated with thalidomide. Starting dose was 200 mg/d, and 20 patients had dose escalations up to 400 (n = 5), 600 (n = 12) or 800 mg/d (n = 3), usually in divided doses. Nineteen patients were refractory to recent chemotherapy, and four had untreated relapse after prior intensive therapy. Ten out of 23 patients (43%) achieved partial response (PR; nine with refractory and one with relapsed disease), six patients had minor response or stabilization of the disease and four had disease progression. Another three patients died early from advanced myeloma at less than 3 weeks of thalidomide therapy. Of the 10 patients with PR, seven had a better response than after any prior therapy, despite vincristine-doxorubicin-dexamethasone (VAD)-based treatment in all but one and high-dose melphalan with autologous stem cell support in four. Time to achieve PR was rapid in patients receiving thalidomide in divided doses (median 31 d). Responses also included reduced bone marrow plasma cell infiltration and improved general status. Normalized polyclonal gammaglobulin levels were seen in four cases. Six out of 10 patients with PR remained in remission with a median time on treatment of 23 weeks (range 15-50 weeks). Sedation was common but usually tolerable, and some patients continued full- or part-time work. Four patients had skin problems, three patients had pneumonia, one hypothyrosis, one sinus bradycardia and one minor sensory neuropathy. Thalidomide may induce good partial remissions in advanced refractory myeloma with tolerable toxicity, and should be evaluated in other settings for myeloma patients. Divided thalidomide doses seem to reduce time to achieve remission and may improve response rate.     

A comparison of bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone (Vel-CD) chemotherapy without and with thalidomide (Vel-CTD) for the treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma

We compared the clinical responses and toxicities between bortezomib-based salvage chemotherapy combined with cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, and dexamethasone(Vel-CTD) and without thalidomide (Vel-CD) in patients with relapsed or refractory MM. Eighty-six patients received at least two cycles of treatment with Vel-CTD (bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 i.v. on days 1, 4, 8, and 11; cyclophosphamide 150 mg/m2 orally on days 1–4; thalidomide 50–100 mg/day orally every day; and dexamethasone 20 mg/m2 i.v. on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 every 3 weeks), and 67 patients were given at least two cycles of Vel-CD, which is the same regimen as Vel-CTD except without thalidomide. The overall response rates of the Vel-CD and Vel-CTD groups were 88% and 90% (p>0.05), respectively. There was no difference in the progression free survival (p = 0.69) and overall survival rates(p = 0.49) between the two groups. Grade 3 or more adverse hematologic events occurred in the same proportion of patients in both groups. In terms of non-hematologic toxicities, the Vel-CTD group showed a higher proportion of autonomic neuropathy, motor neuropathy, and sensory neuropathy compared to the Vel-CD group (each, p<0.05). Only three patients in the Vel-CTD group showed thrombotic events despite aspirin prophylaxis. The Vel-CD regimen inpatients with relapsed or refractory MM is an effective and more tolerable salvage therapy compared to Vel-CTD in terms of its comparable response rate and less severe of non-hematologic toxicities.