The effectiveness of cervical versus thoracic thrust manipulation for the improvement of pain,disability, and range of motion in patients with mechanical neck pain

Background:

Many patients present to physical therapy with mechanical neck pain. Cervical and thoracic manipulations are being utilized in treating this impairment, but minimal evidence as to which technique is superior exists in the literature.

Objective:

The purpose of this systematic review is to identify whether cervical or thoracic manipulation is more effective at improving pain, range of motion (ROM), and disability in patients with mechanical neck pain.

Methods:

A comprehensive search of published literature from seven search engines (PubMed, ProQuest, PEDro, CINAHL, Healthsource, Cochrane Library, SPORTDiscus) yielded 13 studies that examined the effectiveness of either cervical manipulations, thoracic manipulations, or cervical and thoracic manipulations to relieve the effects of mechanical neck pain. Eleven of the studies included were randomized controlled trials (RCTs), while two were secondary analyses of RCTs. Each study was assessed using the PEDro scale and found to be of fair to high research quality.

Results:

The studies included in this systematic review produced both positive clinical and statistical differences in pain, disability, and ROM following manipulations of the cervical or thoracic spine.

Conclusion:

There is limited high-quality research directly comparing the two interventions, so determining whether cervical or thoracic thrust manipulation is superior cannot be concluded from this systematic review alone. However, based on the results found in this review, cervical and thoracic thrust manipulations are equally valuable in relieving pain, disability, and improving ROM for a patient with mechanical neck pain in the short term.     

Pain pattern classification and directional preference for patients with neck pain

Objectives:

Pain Pattern Classification (PPC) and Directional Preference (DP) have been shown to be predictive of health care outcomes and serve to guide orthopedic clinical decision making. We conducted a prospective, observational cohort study to verify the association between PPC, DP, and clinical outcomes.

Methods:

Clinical outcome measures including pain intensity and disability were completed at first examination and follow-up by 335 patients. A Pearson’s chi-squared test was used to determine differences in prevalence rates for the categorical variables, and two-sample t-tests were used to determine differences in rates for the continuous variables. A Tukey’s range test was used to determine differences in follow-up pain intensity and disability for neck pain dual-classification schemes.

Results:

The prevalence of DP was 82.4%. The prevalence of CEN, Non-CEN, and Non-Classifiable (NC) was 15.2%, 42.1%, and 25.1%, respectively. The prevalence of DP was lowest for patients with sub-acute symptoms and who were <45 years old. Patients classified as DP CEN had, on average 2.62 NDI units less than patients classified as Non-DP. Patients classified as DP CEN had, on average, 0.90 pain intensity units less than patients classified as Non-DP at follow-up. Patients who demonstrated DP CEN did not have clinically significant lower pain intensity or disability at follow-up than patients who demonstrated Non-DP.

Discussion:

The results of this investigation need to be interpreted with caution with respect to the study design and it’s subsequent strengths and limitations.

Level of Evidence:

1b.     

The efficacy of manual therapy and exercise for different stages of non-specific low back pain: an update of systematic reviews

Objective:

to review and update the evidence for different forms of manual therapy (MT) for patients with different stages of non-specific low back pain (LBP).

Data sources:

MEDLINE, Cochrane-Register-of-Controlled-Trials, PEDro, EMBASE.

Method:

A systematic review of MT with a literature search covering the period of January 2000 to April 2013 was conducted by two independent reviewers according to Cochrane and PRISMA guidelines. A total of 360 studies were evaluated using qualitative criteria. Two stages of LBP were categorized; combined acute–subacute and chronic. Further sub-classification was made according to MT intervention: MT1 (manipulation); MT2 (mobilization and soft-tissue-techniques); and MT3 (MT1 combined with MT2). In each sub-category, MT could be combined or not with exercise or usual medical care (UMC). Consequently, quantitative evaluation criteria were applied to 56 eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and hence 23 low-risk of bias RCTs were identified for review. Only studies providing new updated information (11/23 RCTs) are presented here.

Results:

Acute–subacute LBP: STRONG-evidence in favour of MT1 when compared to sham for pain, function and health improvements in the short-term (1–3 months). MODERATE-evidence to support MT1 and MT3 combined with UMC in comparison to UMC alone for pain, function and health improvements in the short-term.

Chronic LBP:

MODERATE to STRONG-evidence in favour of MT1 in comparison to sham for pain, function and overall-health in the short-term. MODERATE-evidence in favour of MT3 combined with exercise or UMC in comparison to exercise and back-school was established for pain, function and quality-of-life in the short and long-term. LIMITED-evidence in favour of MT2 combined with exercise and UMC in comparison to UMC alone for pain and function from short to long-term. LIMITED-evidence of no effect for MT1 with extension-exercise compared to extension-exercise alone for pain in the short to long-term.

Conclusion:

This systematic review updates the evidence for MT with exercise or UMC for different stages of LBP and provides recommendations for future studies.     

A randomized clinical trial to compare the immediate effects of seated thoracic manipulation and targeted supine thoracic manipulation on cervical spine flexion range of motion and pain

Design:

Randomized clinical trial.

Objectives:

To determine the effectiveness of seated thoracic manipulation versus targeted supine thoracic manipulation on cervical spine pain and flexion range of motion (ROM). There is evidence that thoracic spine manipulation is an effective treatment for patients with cervical spine pain. This evidence includes a variety of techniques to manipulate the thoracic spine. Although each of them is effective, no research has compared techniques to determine which produces the best outcomes.

Methods:

A total of 39 patients with cervical spine pain were randomly assigned to either a seated thoracic manipulation or targeted supine thoracic manipulation group. Pain and flexion ROM measures were taken before and after the intervention.

Results:

Pain reduction (post-treatment–pre-treatment) was significantly greater in those patients receiving the targeted supine thoracic manipulation compared to the seated thoracic manipulation (P<0·05). Although not significant, we did observe greater improvement in flexion ROM in the targeted supine thoracic manipulation group. The results of this study indicate that a targeted supine thoracic manipulation may be more effective in reducing cervical spine pain and improving cervical flexion ROM than a seated thoracic manipulation. Future studies should include a variety of patients and physical therapists (PTs) to validate our findings.     

The creation of the diagnostic accuracy quality scale (DAQS)

Background:

The utility of a dedicated clinical test is dependent on the diagnostic accuracy values and the quality of the study in which the test was examined. Scales allow a summative scoring of bias within a study. At present, there are no scales advocated to measure the bias of diagnostic accuracy studies.

Objective:

The objective of this study was to create a new diagnostic accuracy quality scale (DAQS) that provides a quantitative summary of the methodological quality of studies evaluating clinical tests and measures.

Design:

The study used a four-round Delphi survey designed to create, revise, and develop consensus for a quality scale.

Methods:

The four-round Delphi involved a work team and a respondent group of experts. An initial round among the work team created a working document, which was then modified and revised, with opportunities to create new items threaded in the second round. Rounds III and IV involved voting on the importance of each of the proposed items and consensus development from the respondent group. Consensus for the selection of an item required a 75% approval for the importance of that item.

Results:

Sixteen individuals with a variety of research/professional backgrounds made up the respondent group. Modification and revision of the initial work team instrument created a scale with 21 items that reflected potential areas of methodological bias.

Limitations:

The new scale needs validation through weighted assessment. In addition, there was a large proportion of physical therapist/researchers on the work team and the respondent group.

Conclusions:

Systematic reviews allow summation of evidence for clinical tests and scales are essential to critique the quality of the articles included in the review. The DAQS may serve this role for diagnostic accuracy studies.     

Metastatic cancer mimicking mechanical low back pain: a case report

Objective and Importance:

The purpose of this report is to describe the clinical course of a patient referred to physiotherapy (PT) for the treatment of low back pain who was subsequently diagnosed with metastatic non-small cell carcinoma of the lung.

Clinical Presentation:

A 48-year old woman was referred to PT for the evaluation and treatment of an insidious onset of low back pain of 2 month duration. The patient did not have a history of cancer, recent weight changes, or general health concerns. The patient’s history and physical examination were consistent with a mechanical neuromusculoskeletal dysfunction and no red flag findings were present that warranted immediate medical referral.

Intervention:

Short-term symptomatic improvements were achieved using the treatment-based classification approach. However, despite five PT sessions over the course of 5 weeks, the patient did not experience long-term symptomatic improvement. On the sixth session, the patient reported a 2-day history of left hand weakness and headaches. This prompted the physiotherapist to refer the patient to the emergency department where she was diagnosed with lung cancer.

Conclusion:

Differential diagnosis is a key component of PT practice. The ability to reproduce symptoms or achieve short-term symptomatic gains is not sufficient to rule out sinister pathology. This case demonstrates how extra caution should be taken in patients who are smokers with thoracolumbar region pain of unknown origin. The need for caution is magnified when one can achieve no more than short-term improvements in the patient’s symptoms.     

Adductor-related groin pain in the athlete

Background:

Owing to a multifactorial etiology, the differential diagnosis of groin pain in the athlete is often complex, with a diagnosis being clinically elusive in up to 30% of individuals. It has been suggested in the literature that the adductor musculature is a viable and prevalent source of groin pain. Thus, recognition of the elements related to effective management of these individuals is essential for the clinician.

Objectives:

To review the current literature related to prevalence, risk factors, clinical testing, conservative, and surgical interventions for adductor-related groin pain.

Major findings:

Adductor-related groin injuries may occur in isolation or combination. Athletes participating in multi-directional sports, with prior groin injury, weakness of adductors compared to abductors, and higher level of play are at greatest risk. Clinical testing using the adductor squeeze test at varying angles offers high specificity in the absence of imaging modalities. Evidence for preventative programs exists among soccer and ice hockey players. Interventions focusing on progressively improving adductor muscle performance and lower extremity impairments have been found effective, as have multi-modal interventions. Surgical interventions, recommended for those recalcitrant (>2 months) to conservative care appear effective, with adductor repair or tenotomy procedures being primarily described in case series designs.

Conclusion:

A paucity of research exists to determine the diagnostic utility of clinical tests as well as the efficacy of interventions. Clinicians should be aware of adductor-related groin pain as a clinical entity and recognize the potential merits and limitations of both preventive and adductor-focused interventions.     

Yoga for pain and sleep quality in rheumatoid arthritis: study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial

Background:

Yoga is a popular complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) therapy among people with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), perceived as offering self-management options for physical and psychosocial symptoms associated with RA.

Objectives:

The primary aims of the current pilot study are (1) to assess the feasibility and safety of a relaxation-focused yoga intervention tailored for people with RA and (2) to estimate the effect of yoga on RA-related pain, sleep quality, functional disability, disease activity, quality of life, anxiety, depression, and fatigue.

Method:

Twenty-eight participants with at least minimum levels of RA-related pain and sleep disturbance will be recruited from a local public hospital database. Participants meeting inclusion criteria will be randomized into either a yoga group (receiving an 8-week program of once-weekly 75-minute relaxation-based yoga classes and thrice-weekly home practice), or a usual care control group. Outcomes will be assessed at baseline, 9, and 12 weeks. Feasibility is operationalized as acceptability (recruitment, adherence, participant retention, and participant satisfaction) and safety of the yoga intervention. Effect sizes for changes in pain, sleep quality, functional disability, disease activity, quality of life, mental health, and fatigue will be estimated.

Discussion:

Results of this pilot study will provide empirical data to determine if a larger, statistically powered main trial is feasible and safe in a national RA population. Additionally, participant feedback will provide information regarding further adaption and tailoring of the study protocol to a clinical RA population.

Trial registration:

Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12612001019897 (registered 20/09/2012).     

Content and bibliometric analyses of the Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy

Background:

Article characteristics and trends have been elucidated for other physical therapy-focused journals using content and bibliometric analysis. These findings are important for assessing the current state of a journal and for guiding future publication of research. To date, these analyses have not been performed for the Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy (JMMT).

Objective:

To describe content and trends for articles published in JMMT over a 20-year period (1993–2012).

Methods:

Journal articles were coded using previously-established domains (article type, participant type, research design, study purpose, and clinical condition). Total publications and proportion of publications based on domain were described. Articles specific to manual therapy intervention were examined and compared to data from other physical therapy-focused journals. Impact by citation and author was examined using bibliometric software.

Results:

Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy was found to have a recent acceleration in the number of articles published annually. Over time, topical reviews have decreased in favor of research reports. However, rigorous study designs have represented only a small portion of total journal content, and case reports have maintained a consistent publication presence. Manual therapy intervention articles in JMMT are predominantly case designs, however are similar in characteristics to manual therapy intervention articles published in other physical therapy-focused journals. For JMMT articles overall and manual therapy intervention articles across journals, young to middle-aged symptomatic adults with low back and/or neck pain were the most common study participants.

Discussion:

Increases in the number of papers and a move toward research reports were observed in JMMT over the 20-year period. Considerations for the future were outlined, including the publication of articles with more rigorous research designs. Manual therapy research for adolescents and older adults and for upper and lower extremity conditions should also be considered as priorities for the future.     

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic changes in older adults and implications for palliative care

Background: As the population of older adults continues to increase, there will be an increase in the number of older patients requiring pain and symptom management in the setting of advanced, serious illness.

Objectives: To review age-related changes in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, and to put these changes in the context of providing palliative care to geriatric patients.

Method: Review of literature relevant to age-related changes in physiology, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics; and the practice of palliative care for geriatric patients.

Results: Multiple age related changes occur which affect the choice and dosing of medications, including those used for pain and symptom management.

Conclusion: The safe and effective management of symptoms in advanced illness for older adults depends on having a clear understanding of physical and metabolic changes and their impact of selection of drug therapy.     

Thoracic manipulation versus mobilization in patients with mechanical neck pain: a systematic review

Objectives:

Thoracic manipulation is widely used in physical therapy and has been shown to be effective at addressing mechanical neck pain. However, thoracic mobilization may produce similar effects. The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the current literature regarding the effectiveness of thoracic manipulation versus mobilization in patients with mechanical neck pain.

Methods:

ProQuest, NCBI-PubMed, APTA's Hooked on Evidence, Cochrane Library, CINAHL and SPORTDiscus were searched to identify relevant studies. Fourteen studies meeting the inclusion criteria were analyzed using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale and the GRADE approach.

Results:

The literature as assessed by the PEDro scale was fair and the GRADE method showed overall quality ranging from very low to moderate quality. The 14 included studies showed positive outcomes on cervical pain levels, range of motion, and/or disability with the use of thoracic manipulation or mobilization. There was a paucity of literature directly comparing thoracic manipulation and mobilization.

Discussion:

Current limitations in the body of research, specifically regarding the use of thoracic mobilization, limit the recommendation of its use compared to thoracic manipulation for patients with mechanical neck pain. There is, however, a significant amount of evidence, although of varied quality, for the short-term benefits of thoracic manipulation in treating patients with this condition. Further high quality research is necessary to determine which technique is more effective in treating patients with mechanical neck pain.     

Quality indicators for the diagnosis and antibiotic treatment of acute respiratory tract infections in general practice: a RAND Appropriateness Method

Objective: To develop quality indicators for the diagnosis and antibiotic treatment of acute respiratory tract infections, tailored to the Danish general practice setting.

Design: A RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method was used.

Setting: General practice.

Subjects: A panel of nine experts, mainly general practitioners, was asked to rate the relevance of 64 quality indicators for the diagnosis and antibiotic treatment of acute respiratory tract infections based on guidelines. Subsequently, a face-to-face meeting was held to resolve misinterpretations and to achieve consensus.

Main outcome measures: The experts were asked to rate the indicators on a nine-point Likert scale. Consensus of appropriateness for a quality indicator was reached if the overall panel median rating was 7–9 with agreement.

Results: A total of 50 of the 64 proposed quality indicators attained consensus. Consensus was achieved for 12 indicators focusing on the diagnostic process and 19 indicators focusing on the decision about antibiotic treatment and choice of antibiotics, respectively.

Conclusion: These newly developed quality indicators may be used to strengthen Danish general practitioners’ focus on their management of patients with acute respiratory tract infections and to identify where there is a need for future quality improvements.     

Identification of the affected ear in lateral canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo

Background:

The effective management of lateral canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (LC-BPPV) is dependent upon the accurate identification of the affected ear. The supine roll test is the gold standard for diagnosing LC-BPPV. However, in some cases, the elicited nystagmus has a similar intensity when the head is rolled to the right or to the left.

Objectives:

The purpose of this systematic review was to determine the effectiveness of accessory diagnostic procedures, used in conjunction with the supine roll test, at accurately identifying the affected ear in individuals with LC-BPPV.

Methods:

The following databases were searched: (1) CINAHL Plus with Full Text, (2) ProQuest Medical Library, and (3) MEDLINE. The following search terms were used: (1) ‘lateral canal’ OR ‘horizontal canal’ AND (2) ‘positional vertigo’ OR ‘positioning vertigo’ OR ‘positional nystagmus’ OR ‘positioning nystagmus’. Evidence level was examined with the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine 2011 levels of evidence method, and methodological rigour was examined with the QUADAS method.

Results:

A database search originally identified 1348 records, and nine studies were ultimately included in the qualitative synthesis. This systematic review revealed four index tests that, when used in conjunction with the supine roll test, were able to accurately identify the affected ear in a majority of individuals with LC-BPPV.

Conclusions:

The pseudo-spontaneous test was found to be slightly superior to the other three index tests in terms of eliciting nystagmus during its administration and identifying the same affected ear as the supine roll test.     

Repetition of intentional drug overdose: a population-based study

Context: Intentional overdose is a leading method of self-harm and suicide, and repeat attempts strongly predict eventual death by suicide.

Objectives: To determine the risk of recurrence after a first intentional overdose. Secondary objectives included characterization of the temporal course and potential predictors of repeat overdose, a strong risk factor for death from suicide.

Methods: Design: Population-based cohort study.

Setting: Ontario, Canada, from 1 April 2002 to 31 March 2013.

Participants: All Ontario residents presenting to an emergency department after a first intentional overdose.

Main outcome measures: The incidence and timing of recurrent overdose.

Results: We followed 81,675 patients discharged from hospital after a first intentional overdose. Overall, 13,903 (17.0%) returned with a repeat overdose after a median interval of 288 (inter-quartile range: 62 to 834) days. Of these, 4493 (5.5%) had multiple repeat episodes. Factors associated with repeat self-poisoning included psychiatric care in the preceding year (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.55; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.50 to 1.61), alcohol dependence (aHR 1.41; 95% CI 1.35 to 1.46) and documented depression (aHR 1.39; 95% CI 1.34 to 1.44). Female sex, rural residence, lower socioeconomic status, ingestion of psychoactive drugs and younger age were also weakly associated with repeat overdose.

Discussion: Hospital presentation for repetition of intentional overdose is common, with recurrent episodes often far removed from the first. While several factors predict overdose repetition, none is particularly strong.

Conclusion: Secondary prevention initiatives should be implemented for all individuals who present to the emergency department and survive intentional overdose.     

The effect on the patient flow in a local health care after implementing reverse triage in a primary care emergency department: a longitudinal follow-up study

Objective: Reverse triage means that patients who are not considered to be in need of medical services are not placed on the doctor’s list in an emergency department (ED) but are sent, after face-to-face evaluation by a triage nurse, to a more appropriate health care unit. It is not known how an abrupt application of such reverse triage in a combined primary care ED alters the demand for doctors’ services in collaborative parts of the health care system.

Design: An observational study.

Setting: Register-based retrospective quasi-experimental longitudinal follow-up study based on a before–after setting in a Finnish city.

Subjects: Patients who consulted different doctors in a local health care unit.

Main outcome measures: Numbers of monthly visits to different doctor groups in public and private primary care, and numbers of monthly referrals to secondary care ED from different sources of primary care were recorded before and after abrupt implementation of the reverse triage.

Results: The beginning of reverse triage decreased the number of patient visits to a primary ED doctor without increasing mortality. Simultaneously, there was an increase in doctor visits in the adjacent secondary care ED and local private sector. The number of patients who came to secondary care ED without a referral or with a referral from the private sector increased.

Conclusions: The data suggested that the reverse triage causes redistribution of the use of doctors’ services rather than a true decrease in the use of these services.     

Peripheral response to cervical or thoracic spinal manual therapy: an evidence-based review with meta analysis

Objectives:

Spinal manual therapy (SMT) is commonly used for treatment of musculoskeletal pain in the neck, upper back, or upper extremity. Some authors report a multi-system effect of SMT, including peripheral alterations in skin conductance and skin temperature, suggesting that SMT may initiate a sympathetic nervous system (SNS) response. The focus of this evidence-based review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the evidence of SNS responses and clinically relevant outcomes following SMT to the cervical or thoracic spine.

Methods:

A systematic search used the terms: ‘manual therapy’, ‘SMT’, ‘spinal manipulation’, ‘mobilization’, ‘SNS’, ‘autonomic nervous system’, ‘neurophysiology’, ‘hypoalgesia’, ‘pain pathophysiology’, ‘cervical vertebrae’, ‘thoracic vertebrae’, ‘upper extremity’, and ‘neurodynamic test’. Data were extracted and within-group and between-group effect sizes were calculated for outcomes of skin conductance, skin temperature, pain, and upper extremity range of motion (ROM) during upper limb neurodynamic tests (ULNTs).

Results:

Eleven studies were identified. Statistically significant changes were seen with increased skin conductance, decreased skin temperature, decreased pain, and increased upper extremity ROM during ULNT.

Discussion:

A mechanical stimulus at the cervical or thoracic spine can produce a SNS excitatory response (increased skin conductance and decreased skin temperature). Findings of reduced pain and increased ROM during ULNT provide support to the clinical relevance of SMT. This evidence points toward additional mechanisms underlying the therapeutic effect of SMT. The effect sizes are small to moderate and no long-term effects post-SMT were collected. Future research is needed to associate peripheral effects with a possible centrally-mediated response to SMT.     

Patient trajectories in a Norwegian unit of municipal emergency beds

Objective: The Coordination reform was implemented in Norway from 2012, aiming at seamless patient trajectories. All municipalities are required to establish emergency care beds (MEBs) to avoid unnecessary hospital admissions. We aimed to examine occupancy rate, patient characteristics, diagnoses and discharge level of municipal care in a small MEB unit.

Design: Cross-sectional, observational study.

Setting: A two-bed emergency care unit.

Subjects: All patients admitted to the unit during one year.

Main outcome measures: Patients’ age and gender, comorbidity, main diagnoses and municipal care level on admission and discharge, diagnostic and therapeutic initiatives, occupancy rate.

Results: Sixty admissions were registered, with total bed occupancy 194 days, and an occupancy rate of 0.27. The patients (median age 83 years, 57% women) had mostly infections, musculoskeletal symptoms or undefined conditions. Some 48% of the stays exceeded three days and 43% of the patients were subsequently transferred to nursing homes or hospitals.

Conclusion: Occupancy rate was low. Patient selection was not according to national standards, and stays were longer. Many patients were transferred to nursing homes, indicating that the unit was an intermediate pathway or a short cut to institutional care. It is unclear whether the unit avoided hospital admissions.