Effects of fesoterodine on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of warfarin in healthy volunteers

AIMS

To confirm the lack of an interaction of fesoterodine 8 mg with warfarin pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in healthy adults.

METHODS

In this open-label, two-treatment, crossover study, subjects (n = 14) aged 20–41 years with normal prothrombin time (PT) and International Normalized Ratio (INR) were randomized to receive a single dose of warfarin 25 mg alone in one period and fesoterodine 8 mg once daily on days 1–9 with a single dose of warfarin 25 mg co-administered on day 3 in the other period. There was a 10-day washout between treatments. Pharmacokinetic endpoints were area under the plasma concentration–time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUC(0,∞)), maximum plasma concentration (C_max), AUC from time 0 to the time of the last quantifiable concentration (AUC(0,last)), time to C_max (t_max), and half-life (t_1/2) for S- and R-warfarin. Pharmacodynamic endpoints were area under the INR-time curve (AUC_INR), maximum INR (INR_max), area under the PT-time curve (AUC_PT) and maximum PT (PT_max).

RESULTS

Across all pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic comparisons, the point estimates of treatment ratio (warfarin co-administered with fesoterodine vs. warfarin alone) were 92–100%. The 90% confidence intervals for the ratios of the adjusted geometric means were contained within (80%, 125%). There were no clinically relevant changes in laboratory tests, vital signs or ECG recordings.

CONCLUSIONS

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of warfarin 25 mg in healthy adults are unaffected by fesoterodine 8 mg. Concomitant administration of fesoterodine and warfarin was well tolerated.     

The effects of CYP2D6 and CYP3A activities on the pharmacokinetics of immediate release oxycodone

Background and purpose:

There is high interindividual variability in the activity of drug-metabolizing enzymes catalysing the oxidation of oxycodone [cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6 and 3A], due to genetic polymorphisms and/or drug–drug interactions. The effects of CYP2D6 and/or CYP3A activity modulation on the pharmacokinetics of oxycodone remains poorly explored.

Experimental approach:

A randomized crossover double-blind placebo-controlled study was performed with 10 healthy volunteers genotyped for CYP2D6 [six extensive (EM), two deficient (PM/IM) and two ultrarapid metabolizers (UM)]. The volunteers randomly received on five different occasions: oxycodone 0.2 mg·kg⁻¹ and placebo; oxycodone and quinidine (CYP2D6 inhibitor); oxycodone and ketoconazole (CYP3A inhibitor); oxycodone and quinidine+ketoconazole; placebo. Blood samples for plasma concentrations of oxycodone and metabolites (oxymorphone, noroxycodone and noroxymorphone) were collected for 24 h after dosing. Phenotyping for CYP2D6 (with dextromethorphan) and CYP3A (with midazolam) were assessed at each session.

Key results:

CYP2D6 activity was correlated with oxymorphone and noroxymorphone AUCs and C_max (−0.71 < Spearman correlation coefficient ρs < −0.92). Oxymorphone C_max was 62% and 75% lower in PM than EM and UM. Noroxymorphone C_max reduction was even more pronounced (90%). In UM, oxymorphone and noroxymorphone concentrations increased whereas noroxycodone exposure was halved. Blocking CYP2D6 (with quinidine) reduced oxymorphone and noroxymorphone C_max by 40% and 80%, and increased noroxycodone AUC_∞ by 70%. Blocking CYP3A4 (with ketoconazole) tripled oxymorphone AUC_∞ and reduced noroxycodone and noroxymorphone AUCs by 80%. Shunting to CYP2D6 pathway was observed after CYP3A4 inhibition.

Conclusions and implications:

Drug–drug interactions via CYP2D6 and CYP3A affected oxycodone pharmacokinetics and its magnitude depended on CYP2D6 genotype.     

Comparison of pharmacokinetic variability of fesoterodine vs. tolterodine extended release in cytochrome P450 2D6 extensive and poor metabolizers

AIMS

Tolterodine and 5-hydroxymethyl tolterodine (5-HMT) are equipotent active moieties of tolterodine; 5-HMT is the singular active moiety of fesoterodine. Formation of 5-HMT from fesoterodine and tolterodine occurs via esterases and CYP2D6 respectively. This randomized, crossover, open-label, multiple-dose study in CYP2D6 extensive metabolizers (EMs) and poor metabolizers (PMs) compared the pharmacokinetics of fesoterodine vs. tolterodine extended release (ER).

METHODS

Subjects received fesoterodine and tolterodine ER with a ≥3-day washout period. Treatment comprised 4-mg once daily doses for 5 days escalated to 8-mg once daily for 5 days. Pharmacokinetics of active moieties were compared by drug, dose and genotype.

RESULTS

Active moiety exposures following fesoterodine and tolterodine ER increased proportional to dose in EMs and PMs. In EMs only, coefficients of variation for AUC and C_max following fesoterodine (up to 46% and 48% respectively) were lower than those following tolterodine ER (up to 87% and 87% respectively). Following fesoterodine and tolterodine ER administration, active moiety exposures ranged up to sevenfold and 40-fold respectively. Mean urinary excretion of 5-HMT following fesoterodine 4 and 8 mg, respectively, was 0.44 and 0.89 mg in EMs and 0.60 and 1.32 mg in PMs. Following tolterodine ER 4 and 8 mg, it was 0.38 and 0.71 mg respectively (EMs only). Renal clearance was similar regardless of administered drug, dose or genotype.

CONCLUSIONS

Tolterodine, not 5-HMT, was the principal source of variability after tolterodine ER administration. Fesoterodine delivers 5-HMT with less variability than tolterodine, regardless of CYP2D6 status, with up to 40% higher bioavailability. The pharmacokinetics of fesoterodine were considerably less variable than TER.     

Lack of effect of tofacitinib (CP-690,550) on the pharmacokinetics of the CYP3A4 substrate midazolam in healthy volunteers: confirmation of in vitro data

AIMS

To investigate inhibitive and inductive effects of tofacitinib (CP-690,550), a Janus kinase inhibitor, on CYP3A4 function via in vitro and in vivo studies.

METHODS

In vitro experiments were conducted to assess the inhibition and induction potential of tofacitinib for major drug metabolizing enzymes (CYP1A2, CYP2B6, CYP2C8, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6 and CYP3A4). A phase 1, randomized, open-label, two-way crossover study ({"type":"clinical-trial","attrs":{"text":"NCT00902460","term_id":"NCT00902460"}}NCT00902460) was conducted to confirm the lack of inhibitive/inductive effect on a sensitive CYP3A4 substrate, midazolam, in healthy subjects. Midazolam pharmacokinetics were assessed over 24 h following single dose 2 mg administration prior to administering tofacitinib and after twice daily dosing of tofacitinib 30 mg for 6 days. The primary endpoint was midazolam area under the concentration–time profile, from time 0 to infinity (AUC(0,∞)).

RESULTS

In vitro studies demonstrated low potential for CYP inhibition (IC₅₀ estimates tofacitinib >30 µm), CYP3A4 mRNA induction (observed at tofacitinib concentrations ≥25 µm) and no effect on enzymatic activity of CYP substrates. In the human study, AUC(0,∞) adjusted geometric mean ratio for midazolam plus tofacitinib to midazolam alone was 103.97% [90% confidence interval (CI) 95.57, 113.12], wholly within the pre-specified acceptance region (80, 125). The 90% CI for the ratio of adjusted geometric means of maximum plasma concentration (C_max) (95.98, 108.87) was also wholly within this acceptance region.

CONCLUSIONS

These data confirm a lack of an inhibitive or inductive effect of tofacitinib on CYP3A activity in humans and, in conjunction with in vitro data, support the conclusion that tofacitinib is unlikely to influence the CYP enzyme system as a whole.     

Influence of fluconazole on the pharmacokinetics of omeprazole in healthy volunteers

Influence of fluconazole on the pharmacokinetics of omeprazole was evaluated by single oral administration of omeprazole capsule 20 mg (control group), or single oral administration of fluconazole capsule, 100 mg, and omeprazole, 20 mg, after 4 days of daily oral administration of fluconazole, 100 mg (treated group), to 18 healthy male volunteers. Omeprazole is extensively metabolized in the liver through 5-hydroxylation and sulfoxidation reactions catalyzed predominantly by CYP2C19 and CYP3A4, respectively. Fluconazole is a potent competitive inhibitor of CYP2C19 and a weak inhibitor of CYP3A4. In treated group, the area under the plasma concentration-time curve of omeprazole from time zero to time infinity (AUC) was significantly greater (3090 vs 491 ng h/ml), terminal half-life of omeprazole was significantly longer (2.59 vs 0.85 h), and peak plasma concentration of omeprazole (C(max)) was significantly higher (746 vs 311 ng/ml) than that in control group. The greater AUC and higher C(max) in treated group could be due to inhibition of omeprazole metabolism by fluconazole.     

The pharmacokinetics of darexaban are not affected to a clinically relevant degree by rifampicin,a strong inducer of P-glycoprotein and CYP3A4

AIMS

We investigated the effects of rifampicin on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of the direct clotting factor Xa inhibitor darexaban (YM150) and its main active metabolite, darexaban glucuronide (YM-222714), which almost entirely determines the antithrombotic effect.

METHODS

In this open-label, single-sequence study, 26 healthy men received one dose of darexaban 60 mg on day 1 and oral rifampicin 600 mg once daily on days 4−14. On day 11, a second dose of darexaban 60 mg was given with rifampicin. Blood and urine were collected after study drug administration on days 1−14. The maximal plasma drug concentration (C_max) and exposure [area under the plasma concentration–time curve from time zero to time of quantifiable measurable concentration; (AUC_last) or AUC_last extrapolated to infinity (AUC_∞)] were assessed by analysis of variance of PK. Limits for statistical significance of 90% confidence intervals for AUC and C_max ratios were predefined as 80−125%.

RESULTS

Darexaban glucuronide plasma exposure was not affected by rifampicin; the geometric mean ratio (90% confidence interval) of AUC_last with/without rifampicin was 1.08 (1.00, 1.16). The C_max of darexaban glucuronide increased by 54% after rifampicin [ratio 1.54 (1.37, 1.73)]. The plasma concentrations of darexaban were very low (<1% of darexaban glucuronide concentrations) with and without rifampicin. Darexaban alone or in combination with rifampicin was generally safe and well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, rifampicin did not affect the PK profiles of darexaban glucuronide and darexaban to a clinically relevant degree, suggesting that the potential for drug−drug interactions between darexaban and CYP3A4 or P-glycoprotein-inducing agents is low.     

氟康唑2种制剂在健康志愿者体内生物利用度和药物动力学比较

目的：比较氟康唑２种制剂在中国健康志愿者体内的药物动力学和生物利用度。方法：１０例中国健康志愿者随机交叉口服氟康唑２种（三维，辉瑞）胶囊各３００ｍｇ，采用反相ＨＰＬＣ法测定血中药物浓度。结果：氟康唑（三维）和氟康唑（辉瑞）ＡＵＣ分别为（２７９±６４）ｍｇ·ｈ／Ｌ和（２８９±５７）ｍｇ·ｈ／Ｌ；Ｃｍａｘ分别为（６．７±１．０）ｍｇ／Ｌ和（７．０±０．８）ｍｇ／Ｌ；Ｔｍａｘ分别为（１．９±０．７）ｈ和（１．９±０．７）ｈ；Ｔ１２β分别为（３７±７）ｈ和（３７±７）ｈ；Ｃｌ分别为（１．１４±０．２７）Ｌ／ｈ和（１．０８±０．２２）Ｌ／ｈ；Ｖｄ分别为（４１±２２）Ｌ和（３５±１１）Ｌ；Ｋｅ分别为（０．０４０±０．０１０）／ｈ和（０．０３０±０．０１０）／ｈ。氟康唑（三维）胶囊的相对生物利用度为９６％。差别无显著意义（Ｐ＞０．０５）。结论：氟康唑２种制剂在中国健康志愿者体内的药动学参数相似，具有生物等效性。     

Validation of 4β-hydroxycholesterol and evaluation of other endogenous biomarkers for the assessment of CYP3A activity in healthy subjects

AimsThis study aimed to assess changes in the plasma concentrationss of 4β-hydroxycholesterol (4βHC) against intravenous (i.v.) and oral midazolam (MDZ) pharmacokinetics (PK) after administration of a potent CYP3A inhibitor [ketoconazole (KETO)] and inducer [rifampicin (RIF)].MethodsThirty-two healthy subjects (HS) were allocated into three groups of 12 each in KETO and RIF and 10 in a placebo group (PLB). All HS were randomized to receive oral and i.v. MDZ on day 1 or 2 and on day 15 or 16 after receiving RIF (600 mg once daily), KETO (400 mg once daily) or PLB for 2 weeks. Subjects were followed until day 30. The effect of treatments on 4βHC was assessed by analyzing % change from baseline using a linear spline mixed effects model.ResultsCompared with PLB, KETO decreased 4βHC mean values up to 13% (P = 0.003) and RIF increased 4βHC mean values up to 220% (P < 0.001). Within 14 days of stopping KETO and RIF, 4βHC had either returned to baseline (KETO) or was still returning to baseline (RIF). Compared with baseline, mean oral MDZ AUC increased by 11-fold (90% CI ranging from 9-fold to 13-fold increase) and decreased by 92% (90% CI ranging from 90% to 95% decrease) after KETO and RIF, respectively. Similar trends were observed for 6β-hydroxycortisol : cortisol (6βHCL : CL) urinary ratios.ConclusionsChanges in plasma 4βHC can be utilized as a surrogate for MDZ PK after multiple doses of potent CYP3A inducers. There is a more limited dynamic range for 4βHC for assessment of potential CYP3A inhibitors. 4βHC is a valuable tool for the assessment of potential CYP3A inducers in early drug development.     

Effects of three cytochrome P450 inhibitors, ketoconazole, fluconazole, and paroxetine, on the pharmacokinetics of lasofoxifene

AIMS: Two studies were conduced to assess the effects of ketoconazole, a CYP3A4/5 inhibitor; fluconazole, a CYP2C9 inhibitor; and paroxetine, a CYP2D6 inhibitor, on lasofoxifene pharmacokinetics. METHODS: The first parallel group study was conducted in 45 healthy postmenopausal women (15 per group) to compare the pharmacokinetics of a single dose of lasofoxifene (0.25 mg) administered alone and in combination with ketoconazole (400 mg daily x 20 days) or fluconazole (400 mg daily x 20 days). Lasofoxifene was administered on day 2 and blood samples were collected serially for up to 456 h postdose (20 days). The second study enrolled 20 healthy postmenopausal women (10 per group) to compare the pharmacokinetics of a single dose of lasofoxifene (0.25 mg) alone and in combination with paroxetine (30 mg qd x 21 days). Lasofoxifene was given on day 8 of paroxetine treatment and blood samples were collected serially for up to 336 h postdose. RESULTS: All subjects completed the study and the treatments were well tolerated. Lasofoxifene C(max) and AUC ratios [90% confidence interval (CI)] with/without ketoconazole were 111% (98.4, 127) and 120% (105, 136), respectively, and were 91.3% (80.3, 104) and 104% (91.4, 118), respectively, with/without fluconazole. Lasofoxifene C(max) and AUC ratios (90% CI) with/without paroxetine were 118% (95.4, 146) and 135% (120, 152), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Coadministration of potent inhibitors of CYP3A4/5 and CYP2D6, but not CYP2C9, resulted in a moderate increase in lasofoxifene exposure. No dosage adjustment should be required when lasofoxifene is coadministered with ketoconazole, fluconazole, paroxetine or other agents that inhibit these CYP enzymes.     

Effect of raltegravir on estradiol and norgestimate plasma pharmacokinetics following oral contraceptive administration in healthy women

AIMS

Oral contraceptives such as norgestimate–ethinyl estradiol (Ortho Tri-Cyclen®) are commonly prescribed in the HIV-infected patient population. A placebo-controlled, randomized, two-period crossover study in healthy HIV-seronegative subjects was conducted to assess the effect of raltegravir on the pharmacokinetics of the estrogen and progestin components of norgestimate–ethinyl estradiol [ethinyl estradiol (EE) and norelgestromin (NGMN), an active metabolite of norgestimate (NGT)].

METHODS

In each of two periods, nineteen healthy women established on norgestimate–ethinyl estradiol contraception (21 days of active contraception; 7 days of placebo) received either 400 mg raltegravir or matching placebo twice daily on days 1–21. Pharmacokinetics were analysed on day 21 of each period.

RESULTS

The geometric mean ratio (GMR) and 90% confidence interval (CI) for the EE component of norgestimate–ethinyl estradiol when co-administrated with raltegravir relative to EE alone was 0.98 (0.93–1.04) for the area under the concentration–time curve from 0 to 24 h (AUC_{0–24 h}) and 1.06 (0.98–1.14) for the maximum concentration of drug in the plasma (C_max); the GMR (90% CI) for the NGMN component of norgestimate–ethinyl estradiol when co-administered with raltegravir relative to NGMN alone was 1.14 (1.08–1.21) for AUC_{0–24 h} and 1.29 (1.23–1.37) for C_max. There were no discontinuations due to a study drug-related adverse experience, nor any serious clinical or laboratory adverse experience.

CONCLUSIONS

Raltegravir has no clinically important effect on EE or NGMN pharmacokinetics. Co-administration of raltegravir and an oral contraceptive containing EE and NGT was generally well tolerated; no dose adjustment is required for oral contraceptives containing EE and NGT when co-administered with raltegravir.     

A comprehensive non-clinical evaluation of the CNS penetration potential of antimuscarinic agents for the treatment of overactive bladder

AIMS

To assess and compare the mechanisms of central nervous system (CNS) penetration of antimuscarinic overactive bladder (OAB) agents.

METHODS

Physical properties were computed or compiled from the literature. Rats were administered 5-hydroxymethyl tolterodine (HMT), darifenacin, oxybutynin, solifenacin, tolterodine or trospium subcutaneously. At 1 h postdose, plasma, brain and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) concentrations were determined using LC-MS/MS assays. Brain and plasma protein binding were determined in vitro. Permeability in the presence and absence of the efflux transporter P-glycoprotein (P-gp) was assessed in RRCK and MDCK-MDR1 transwell assays.

RESULTS

Oxybutynin displayed extensive CNS penetration, with brain : plasma ratios (B : P), unbound brain : unbound plasma ratios (Kp,free) and CSF : free plasma ratios each >1. Tolterodine (B : P = 2.95, Kp,free = 0.23 and CSF : free plasma = 0.16) and solifenacin (B : P = 3.04, Kp,free = 0.28 and CSF : free plasma = 1.41) showed significant CNS penetration but with some restriction from CNS as indicated by Kp,free values significantly <1. 5-HMT, darifenacin and trospium displayed much lower B : P (0.03–0.16), Kp,free (0.01–0.04) and CSF : free plasma (0.004–0.06), consistent with poor CNS penetration. Permeability in RRCK cells was low for trospium (0.63 × 10⁻⁶ cm s⁻¹), moderate for 5-HMT (11.7 × 10⁻⁶ cm s⁻¹) and high for darifenacin, solifenacin, tolterodine and oxybutynin (21.5–38.2 × 10⁻⁶ cm s⁻¹). In MDCK-MDR1 cells 5-HMT, darifenacin and trospium, were P-gp substrates, whereas oxybutynin, solifenacin and tolterodine were not P-gp substrates.

CONCLUSIONS

Brain penetration was low for antimuscarinics that are P-gp substrates (5-HMT, darifenacin and trospium), and significant for those that are not P-gp substrates (oxybutynin, solifenacin and tolterodine). CNS adverse events reported in randomized controlled clinical trials show general alignment with the preclinical data described in this study.     

Effect of lopinavir/ritonavir on the pharmacokinetics of selexipag an oral prostacyclin receptor agonist and its active metabolite in healthy subjects

Aims

This study investigated the effect of a fixed dose combination of lopinavir/ritonavir on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of selexipag and its active metabolite ACT-333679.

Methods

This was an open label, randomized, single centre, two way, crossover study. Twenty healthy male subjects were treated with a single dose of 400 µg selexipag alone and in combination with multiple doses of lopinavir/ritonavir (400/100 mg) twice daily.

Results

The results showed that lopinavir/ritonavir approximately doubled the exposure to selexipag. The area under the plasma concentration–time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC(0,∞) and the maximum plasma concentration (C_max) of selexipag were 2.2- and 2.1-fold higher, respectively, than under selexipag alone, with a 90% confidence interval (CI) of the geometric mean ratio (GMR) of 1.9, 2.7 and 1.7, 2.6, respectively. For ACT-333679, the clinically more relevant component of selexipag, systemic exposure was increased by 8% (GMR of AUC(0,∞) 1.1, 90% CI 0.9, 1.3), when lopinavir/ritonavir was co-administered with selexipag.The most frequently reported adverse event (AE) was headache. A single dose of selexipag, administered either alone or together with multiple doses of lopinavir/ritonavir, was safe and well tolerated.

Conclusions

Lopinavir/ritonavir does not affect the PK parameters of selexipag and ACT-333679 to a clinically relevant extent. Therefore, adaptation of the selexipag dose is not required when co-administered with inhibitors of the organic anion-transporting polypeptide (OATP) 1B1/ 1B3, P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and/or CYP3A4.     

Association of CYP3A4*18B polymorphisms with the pharmacokinetics of cyclosporine in healthy subjects

The aim of this study is to evaluate the association of the CYP3A4*18B genotype with the cyclosporine metabolism in healthy subjects. We employed PCR–RFLP assays for analysis of the CYP3A4*18B genotype. Each of 26 subjects, comprising 12 CYP3A4*1/*1, 12 CYP3A4*1/*18B and 2 CYP3A4*18B/*18B, was given a single oral dose of cyclosporine (4?mg?kg^?1). The plasma concentrations of cyclosporine were measured for up to 24?h post dose by high-performance liquid chromatography–electrospray mass spectrometry. We found that the mean C_max (95% confidence intervals) of cyclosporine were 2237 (2905, 1859) (*1/*1), 2247 (2916, 1869) (*1/*18B), and 905 (1192, 506) ng?ml^?1 (*18B/*18B) (p?=?0.037) and the mean AUC0-4 were 5026 (6181, 4372) (*1/*1), 4434 (5481, 3841) (*1/*18B) and 2561 (3155, 1736) ng ml-1?h (*18B/*18B) (p?=?0.021). The CL in the *18B/*18B group was significantly higher than in the *1/*1 group. However, T_max exhibited no difference among the three genotypes. *18B/*18B group showed 50% reduction in concentration at 2?h post dose compared with *1/*18B (p?=?0.062) or *1/*1 (p?=?0.047), but no statistical significance was detected between*1/*1 and *1/*18B groups (p?>?0.05). The data suggest that the CYP3A4*18B genotype affects cyclosporine pharmacokinetics probably resulting from a higher enzymatic activity of this mutation in healthy subjects.     

Multiple doses of the antimuscarinic agent solifenacin do not affect the pharmacodynamics or pharmacokinetics of warfarin or the steady-state pharmacokinetics of digoxin in healthy subjects

AIMS: Solifenacin succinate is used for the treatment of overactive bladder (OAB). The potential for pharmacokinetic and/or pharmacodynamic interactions between solifenacin and warfarin or digoxin was investigated. METHODS: The solifenacin-warfarin study was a two-period crossover trial conducted in healthy males. Subjects received warfarin on the 10th day of 16 days of dosing with either solifenacin or placebo. The solifenacin-digoxin study was an one-sequence crossover trial conducted in healthy males and females. Following a phase-in period for digoxin, solifenacin was administered concomitantly with the drug on days 9-18. RESULTS: The AUC(PT; 0-168 h) following a single dose of warfarin was unchanged in the presence of solifenacin [point estimate = 1.005; 90% confidence interval (CI) 0.98, 1.02)]. The AUC(0-infinity) values for both warfarin enantiomers were also unchanged. A small increase in the C(max) of digoxin was observed during treatment with solifenacin, but for AUC(ss,tau) and C(max) the 90% CI fell within the prespecified interval of 0.80-1.25. Combined administration of solifenacin and warfarin or digoxin was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Since the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a single dose of warfarin and the steady-state pharmacokinetics of digoxin were not affected by coadministration of solifenacin in healthy subjects, the need for dosing adjustments for digoxin and/or warfarin does not seem warranted.     

Effects of CYP3A4*1G and CYP3A5*3 polymorphisms on pharmacokinetics of tylerdipine hydrochloride in healthy Chinese subjects

1. The aim of this analysis was to explore the influence of CYP3A4*1G and CYP3A5*3 polymorphisms on the pharmacokinetics of tylerdipine in healthy Chinese subjects.

2. A total of 64 and 63 healthy Chinese subjects were included and identified as the genotypes of CYP3A4*1G and CYP3A5*3, respectively. Plasma samples were collected for up to 120?h post-dose to characterize the pharmacokinetic profile following single oral dose of the drug (5, 15, 20, 25 and 30?mg). Plasma levels were measured by a high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). The pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using non-compartmental method. The maximum concentration (C_max) and the area under the curve (AUC_0–24?h) were all corrected by the dose given.

3. In the wild-type group, the mean dose-corrected AUC_0–24?h was 1.35-fold larger than in CYP3A4*1G carriers (p?=?.018). Among the three CYP3A5 genotypes, there showed significantly difference (p?=?.008) in the t_1/2, but no significant difference was observed for the AUC_0–24?h and C_max. In subjects with the CYP3A5*3/*3 genotype, the mean t_1/2 was 1.35-fold higher than in CYP3A5*1/*1 group (p?=?.007). And the t_1/2 in CYP3A5*3 carriers also was 1.32-fold higher than in the wild-type group (p?=?.004).

4. CYP3A4*1G and CYP3A5*3 polymorphisms may influence tylerdipine pharmacokinetic in healthy Chinese subjects.

     

Effects of CYP3A4 inhibition and induction on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of tolvaptan, a non-peptide AVP antagonist in healthy subjects

AIMS

In vitro studies indicated CYP3A4 alone was responsible for tolvaptan metabolism. To determine the effect of a CYP3A4 inhibitor (ketoconazole) and a CYP3A4 inducer (rifampicin) on tolvaptan pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD), two clinical trials were performed.

METHODS

For CYP3A4 inhibition, a double-blind, randomized (5:1), placebo-controlled trial was conducted in 24 healthy subjects given either a single 30 mg dose of tolvaptan (n = 19) or matching placebo (n = 5) on day 1 with a 72 h washout followed by a 3 day regimen of 200 mg ketoconazole, once daily with 30 mg tolvaptan or placebo also given on day 5. For CYP3A4 induction, 14 healthy subjects were given a single dose of 240 mg tolvaptan with 48 h washout followed by a 7 day regimen of 600 mg rifampicin, once daily, with 240 mg tolvaptan also given on the seventh day.

RESULTS

When co-administered with ketoconazole, mean C_max and AUC(0,∞) of tolvaptan were increased 3.48- and 5.40-fold, respectively. Twenty-four hour urine volume increased from 5.9 to 7.7 l. Erythromycin breath testing showed no difference following a single dose of tolvaptan. With rifampicin, tolvaptan mean C_max and AUC were reduced to 0.13- and 0.17-fold of tolvaptan administered alone. Twenty-four hour urine volume decreased from 12.3 to 8.8 l.

CONCLUSIONS

Tolvaptan is a sensitive CYP3A4 substrate with no inhibitory activity. Due to the saturable nature of tolvaptan''s effect on urine excretion rate, changes in the pharmacokinetic profile of tolvaptan do not produce proportional changes in urine output.     

Exposure to oral oxycodone is increased by concomitant inhibition of CYP2D6 and 3A4 pathways, but not by inhibition of CYP2D6 alone

AIM

The aim of this study was to find out whether the inhibition of cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6) with paroxetine or concomitant inhibition of CYP2D6 and CYP3A4 with paroxetine and itraconazole, altered the pharmacokinetics and pharmacological response of orally administered oxycodone.

METHODS

A randomized placebo-controlled cross-over study design with three phases was used. Eleven healthy subjects ingested 10 mg of oral immediate release oxycodone on the fourth day of pre-treatment with either placebo, paroxetine (20 mg once daily) or paroxetine (20 mg once daily) and itraconazole (200 mg once daily) for 5 days. The plasma concentrations of oxycodone and its oxidative metabolites were measured for 48 h, and pharmacological (analgesic and behavioural) effects were evaluated.

RESULTS

Paroxetine alone reduced the area under concentration–time curve (AUC(0,0–48 h)) of the CYP2D6 dependent metabolite oxymorphone by 44% (P < 0.05), but had no significant effects on the plasma concentrations of oxycodone or its pharmacological effects when compared with the placebo phase. When both oxidative pathways of the metabolism of oxycodone were inhibited with paroxetine and itraconazole, the mean AUC(0,∞) of oxycodone increased by 2.9-fold (P < 0.001), and its C_max by 1.8-fold (P < 0.001). Visual analogue scores for subjective drug effects, drowsiness and deterioration of performance were slightly increased (P < 0.05) after paroxetine + itraconazole pre-treatment when compared with placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

Drug interactions arising from CYP2D6 inhibition most likely have minor clinical importance for oral oxycodone if the function of the CYP3A4 pathway is normal. When both CYP2D6 and CYP3A4 pathways are inhibited, the exposure to oral oxycodone is increased substantially.