AIMS
To confirm the lack of an interaction of fesoterodine 8 mg with warfarin pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in healthy adults.METHODS
In this open-label, two-treatment, crossover study, subjects (n = 14) aged 20–41 years with normal prothrombin time (PT) and International Normalized Ratio (INR) were randomized to receive a single dose of warfarin 25 mg alone in one period and fesoterodine 8 mg once daily on days 1–9 with a single dose of warfarin 25 mg co-administered on day 3 in the other period. There was a 10-day washout between treatments. Pharmacokinetic endpoints were area under the plasma concentration–time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUC(0,∞)), maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), AUC from time 0 to the time of the last quantifiable concentration (AUC(0,last)), time to Cmax (tmax), and half-life (t1/2) for S- and R-warfarin. Pharmacodynamic endpoints were area under the INR-time curve (AUCINR), maximum INR (INRmax), area under the PT-time curve (AUCPT) and maximum PT (PTmax).RESULTS
Across all pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic comparisons, the point estimates of treatment ratio (warfarin co-administered with fesoterodine vs. warfarin alone) were 92–100%. The 90% confidence intervals for the ratios of the adjusted geometric means were contained within (80%, 125%). There were no clinically relevant changes in laboratory tests, vital signs or ECG recordings.CONCLUSIONS
The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of warfarin 25 mg in healthy adults are unaffected by fesoterodine 8 mg. Concomitant administration of fesoterodine and warfarin was well tolerated. 相似文献Background and purpose:
There is high interindividual variability in the activity of drug-metabolizing enzymes catalysing the oxidation of oxycodone [cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6 and 3A], due to genetic polymorphisms and/or drug–drug interactions. The effects of CYP2D6 and/or CYP3A activity modulation on the pharmacokinetics of oxycodone remains poorly explored.Experimental approach:
A randomized crossover double-blind placebo-controlled study was performed with 10 healthy volunteers genotyped for CYP2D6 [six extensive (EM), two deficient (PM/IM) and two ultrarapid metabolizers (UM)]. The volunteers randomly received on five different occasions: oxycodone 0.2 mg·kg−1 and placebo; oxycodone and quinidine (CYP2D6 inhibitor); oxycodone and ketoconazole (CYP3A inhibitor); oxycodone and quinidine+ketoconazole; placebo. Blood samples for plasma concentrations of oxycodone and metabolites (oxymorphone, noroxycodone and noroxymorphone) were collected for 24 h after dosing. Phenotyping for CYP2D6 (with dextromethorphan) and CYP3A (with midazolam) were assessed at each session.Key results:
CYP2D6 activity was correlated with oxymorphone and noroxymorphone AUCs and Cmax (−0.71 < Spearman correlation coefficient ρs < −0.92). Oxymorphone Cmax was 62% and 75% lower in PM than EM and UM. Noroxymorphone Cmax reduction was even more pronounced (90%). In UM, oxymorphone and noroxymorphone concentrations increased whereas noroxycodone exposure was halved. Blocking CYP2D6 (with quinidine) reduced oxymorphone and noroxymorphone Cmax by 40% and 80%, and increased noroxycodone AUC∞ by 70%. Blocking CYP3A4 (with ketoconazole) tripled oxymorphone AUC∞ and reduced noroxycodone and noroxymorphone AUCs by 80%. Shunting to CYP2D6 pathway was observed after CYP3A4 inhibition.Conclusions and implications:
Drug–drug interactions via CYP2D6 and CYP3A affected oxycodone pharmacokinetics and its magnitude depended on CYP2D6 genotype. 相似文献AIMS
Tolterodine and 5-hydroxymethyl tolterodine (5-HMT) are equipotent active moieties of tolterodine; 5-HMT is the singular active moiety of fesoterodine. Formation of 5-HMT from fesoterodine and tolterodine occurs via esterases and CYP2D6 respectively. This randomized, crossover, open-label, multiple-dose study in CYP2D6 extensive metabolizers (EMs) and poor metabolizers (PMs) compared the pharmacokinetics of fesoterodine vs. tolterodine extended release (ER).METHODS
Subjects received fesoterodine and tolterodine ER with a ≥3-day washout period. Treatment comprised 4-mg once daily doses for 5 days escalated to 8-mg once daily for 5 days. Pharmacokinetics of active moieties were compared by drug, dose and genotype.RESULTS
Active moiety exposures following fesoterodine and tolterodine ER increased proportional to dose in EMs and PMs. In EMs only, coefficients of variation for AUC and Cmax following fesoterodine (up to 46% and 48% respectively) were lower than those following tolterodine ER (up to 87% and 87% respectively). Following fesoterodine and tolterodine ER administration, active moiety exposures ranged up to sevenfold and 40-fold respectively. Mean urinary excretion of 5-HMT following fesoterodine 4 and 8 mg, respectively, was 0.44 and 0.89 mg in EMs and 0.60 and 1.32 mg in PMs. Following tolterodine ER 4 and 8 mg, it was 0.38 and 0.71 mg respectively (EMs only). Renal clearance was similar regardless of administered drug, dose or genotype.CONCLUSIONS
Tolterodine, not 5-HMT, was the principal source of variability after tolterodine ER administration. Fesoterodine delivers 5-HMT with less variability than tolterodine, regardless of CYP2D6 status, with up to 40% higher bioavailability. The pharmacokinetics of fesoterodine were considerably less variable than TER. 相似文献AIMS
To investigate inhibitive and inductive effects of tofacitinib (CP-690,550), a Janus kinase inhibitor, on CYP3A4 function via in vitro and in vivo studies.METHODS
In vitro experiments were conducted to assess the inhibition and induction potential of tofacitinib for major drug metabolizing enzymes (CYP1A2, CYP2B6, CYP2C8, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6 and CYP3A4). A phase 1, randomized, open-label, two-way crossover study () was conducted to confirm the lack of inhibitive/inductive effect on a sensitive CYP3A4 substrate, midazolam, in healthy subjects. Midazolam pharmacokinetics were assessed over 24 h following single dose 2 mg administration prior to administering tofacitinib and after twice daily dosing of tofacitinib 30 mg for 6 days. The primary endpoint was midazolam area under the concentration–time profile, from time 0 to infinity (AUC(0,∞)). NCT00902460RESULTS
In vitro studies demonstrated low potential for CYP inhibition (IC50 estimates tofacitinib >30 µm), CYP3A4 mRNA induction (observed at tofacitinib concentrations ≥25 µm) and no effect on enzymatic activity of CYP substrates. In the human study, AUC(0,∞) adjusted geometric mean ratio for midazolam plus tofacitinib to midazolam alone was 103.97% [90% confidence interval (CI) 95.57, 113.12], wholly within the pre-specified acceptance region (80, 125). The 90% CI for the ratio of adjusted geometric means of maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) (95.98, 108.87) was also wholly within this acceptance region.CONCLUSIONS
These data confirm a lack of an inhibitive or inductive effect of tofacitinib on CYP3A activity in humans and, in conjunction with in vitro data, support the conclusion that tofacitinib is unlikely to influence the CYP enzyme system as a whole. 相似文献AIMS
We investigated the effects of rifampicin on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of the direct clotting factor Xa inhibitor darexaban (YM150) and its main active metabolite, darexaban glucuronide (YM-222714), which almost entirely determines the antithrombotic effect.METHODS
In this open-label, single-sequence study, 26 healthy men received one dose of darexaban 60 mg on day 1 and oral rifampicin 600 mg once daily on days 4−14. On day 11, a second dose of darexaban 60 mg was given with rifampicin. Blood and urine were collected after study drug administration on days 1−14. The maximal plasma drug concentration (Cmax) and exposure [area under the plasma concentration–time curve from time zero to time of quantifiable measurable concentration; (AUClast) or AUClast extrapolated to infinity (AUC∞)] were assessed by analysis of variance of PK. Limits for statistical significance of 90% confidence intervals for AUC and Cmax ratios were predefined as 80−125%.RESULTS
Darexaban glucuronide plasma exposure was not affected by rifampicin; the geometric mean ratio (90% confidence interval) of AUClast with/without rifampicin was 1.08 (1.00, 1.16). The Cmax of darexaban glucuronide increased by 54% after rifampicin [ratio 1.54 (1.37, 1.73)]. The plasma concentrations of darexaban were very low (<1% of darexaban glucuronide concentrations) with and without rifampicin. Darexaban alone or in combination with rifampicin was generally safe and well tolerated.CONCLUSIONS
Overall, rifampicin did not affect the PK profiles of darexaban glucuronide and darexaban to a clinically relevant degree, suggesting that the potential for drug−drug interactions between darexaban and CYP3A4 or P-glycoprotein-inducing agents is low. 相似文献![点击此处可从《British journal of clinical pharmacology》网站下载免费的PDF全文](/ch/ext_images/free.gif)
AIMS
Oral contraceptives such as norgestimate–ethinyl estradiol (Ortho Tri-Cyclen®) are commonly prescribed in the HIV-infected patient population. A placebo-controlled, randomized, two-period crossover study in healthy HIV-seronegative subjects was conducted to assess the effect of raltegravir on the pharmacokinetics of the estrogen and progestin components of norgestimate–ethinyl estradiol [ethinyl estradiol (EE) and norelgestromin (NGMN), an active metabolite of norgestimate (NGT)].METHODS
In each of two periods, nineteen healthy women established on norgestimate–ethinyl estradiol contraception (21 days of active contraception; 7 days of placebo) received either 400 mg raltegravir or matching placebo twice daily on days 1–21. Pharmacokinetics were analysed on day 21 of each period.RESULTS
The geometric mean ratio (GMR) and 90% confidence interval (CI) for the EE component of norgestimate–ethinyl estradiol when co-administrated with raltegravir relative to EE alone was 0.98 (0.93–1.04) for the area under the concentration–time curve from 0 to 24 h (AUC0–24 h) and 1.06 (0.98–1.14) for the maximum concentration of drug in the plasma (Cmax); the GMR (90% CI) for the NGMN component of norgestimate–ethinyl estradiol when co-administered with raltegravir relative to NGMN alone was 1.14 (1.08–1.21) for AUC0–24 h and 1.29 (1.23–1.37) for Cmax. There were no discontinuations due to a study drug-related adverse experience, nor any serious clinical or laboratory adverse experience.CONCLUSIONS
Raltegravir has no clinically important effect on EE or NGMN pharmacokinetics. Co-administration of raltegravir and an oral contraceptive containing EE and NGT was generally well tolerated; no dose adjustment is required for oral contraceptives containing EE and NGT when co-administered with raltegravir. 相似文献AIMS
To assess and compare the mechanisms of central nervous system (CNS) penetration of antimuscarinic overactive bladder (OAB) agents.METHODS
Physical properties were computed or compiled from the literature. Rats were administered 5-hydroxymethyl tolterodine (HMT), darifenacin, oxybutynin, solifenacin, tolterodine or trospium subcutaneously. At 1 h postdose, plasma, brain and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) concentrations were determined using LC-MS/MS assays. Brain and plasma protein binding were determined in vitro. Permeability in the presence and absence of the efflux transporter P-glycoprotein (P-gp) was assessed in RRCK and MDCK-MDR1 transwell assays.RESULTS
Oxybutynin displayed extensive CNS penetration, with brain : plasma ratios (B : P), unbound brain : unbound plasma ratios (Kp,free) and CSF : free plasma ratios each >1. Tolterodine (B : P = 2.95, Kp,free = 0.23 and CSF : free plasma = 0.16) and solifenacin (B : P = 3.04, Kp,free = 0.28 and CSF : free plasma = 1.41) showed significant CNS penetration but with some restriction from CNS as indicated by Kp,free values significantly <1. 5-HMT, darifenacin and trospium displayed much lower B : P (0.03–0.16), Kp,free (0.01–0.04) and CSF : free plasma (0.004–0.06), consistent with poor CNS penetration. Permeability in RRCK cells was low for trospium (0.63 × 10−6 cm s−1), moderate for 5-HMT (11.7 × 10−6 cm s−1) and high for darifenacin, solifenacin, tolterodine and oxybutynin (21.5–38.2 × 10−6 cm s−1). In MDCK-MDR1 cells 5-HMT, darifenacin and trospium, were P-gp substrates, whereas oxybutynin, solifenacin and tolterodine were not P-gp substrates.CONCLUSIONS
Brain penetration was low for antimuscarinics that are P-gp substrates (5-HMT, darifenacin and trospium), and significant for those that are not P-gp substrates (oxybutynin, solifenacin and tolterodine). CNS adverse events reported in randomized controlled clinical trials show general alignment with the preclinical data described in this study. 相似文献Aims
This study investigated the effect of a fixed dose combination of lopinavir/ritonavir on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of selexipag and its active metabolite ACT-333679.Methods
This was an open label, randomized, single centre, two way, crossover study. Twenty healthy male subjects were treated with a single dose of 400 µg selexipag alone and in combination with multiple doses of lopinavir/ritonavir (400/100 mg) twice daily.Results
The results showed that lopinavir/ritonavir approximately doubled the exposure to selexipag. The area under the plasma concentration–time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC(0,∞) and the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) of selexipag were 2.2- and 2.1-fold higher, respectively, than under selexipag alone, with a 90% confidence interval (CI) of the geometric mean ratio (GMR) of 1.9, 2.7 and 1.7, 2.6, respectively. For ACT-333679, the clinically more relevant component of selexipag, systemic exposure was increased by 8% (GMR of AUC(0,∞) 1.1, 90% CI 0.9, 1.3), when lopinavir/ritonavir was co-administered with selexipag.The most frequently reported adverse event (AE) was headache. A single dose of selexipag, administered either alone or together with multiple doses of lopinavir/ritonavir, was safe and well tolerated.Conclusions
Lopinavir/ritonavir does not affect the PK parameters of selexipag and ACT-333679 to a clinically relevant extent. Therefore, adaptation of the selexipag dose is not required when co-administered with inhibitors of the organic anion-transporting polypeptide (OATP) 1B1/ 1B3, P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and/or CYP3A4. 相似文献![点击此处可从《British journal of clinical pharmacology》网站下载免费的PDF全文](/ch/ext_images/free.gif)
The aim of this analysis was to explore the influence of CYP3A4*1G and CYP3A5*3 polymorphisms on the pharmacokinetics of tylerdipine in healthy Chinese subjects.
A total of 64 and 63 healthy Chinese subjects were included and identified as the genotypes of CYP3A4*1G and CYP3A5*3, respectively. Plasma samples were collected for up to 120?h post-dose to characterize the pharmacokinetic profile following single oral dose of the drug (5, 15, 20, 25 and 30?mg). Plasma levels were measured by a high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). The pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using non-compartmental method. The maximum concentration (Cmax) and the area under the curve (AUC0–24?h) were all corrected by the dose given.
In the wild-type group, the mean dose-corrected AUC0–24?h was 1.35-fold larger than in CYP3A4*1G carriers (p?=?.018). Among the three CYP3A5 genotypes, there showed significantly difference (p?=?.008) in the t1/2, but no significant difference was observed for the AUC0–24?h and Cmax. In subjects with the CYP3A5*3/*3 genotype, the mean t1/2 was 1.35-fold higher than in CYP3A5*1/*1 group (p?=?.007). And the t1/2 in CYP3A5*3 carriers also was 1.32-fold higher than in the wild-type group (p?=?.004).
CYP3A4*1G and CYP3A5*3 polymorphisms may influence tylerdipine pharmacokinetic in healthy Chinese subjects.