Critical use of extended criteria donor liver grafts in adult-to-adult whole liver transplantation: a single-center experience.

This study presents our experience with the use of extended criteria donor (ECD) liver grafts. One hundred fifteen liver transplants were divided into 2 groups: standard (S) and nonstandard (NS). Fifty-eight patients in group S received a liver procured from an ideal donor, whereas 57 patients in group NS received an organ from an ECD. On the basis of the number of risk factors, patients were divided into 3 subgroups: the S group with 58 receiving a standard graft, the NS1 group with 44 receiving a graft with 1 or 2 risk factors, and the NS2 group with 13 receiving a graft with 3 to 4 risk factors. Patient survival was not different at 6, 12, and 24 months (P > 0.05), whereas graft survival was different (P = 0.0079). Both patient survival and graft survival were influenced by the cumulative number of risk factors. The univariate analysis of the donor risk factors detected hemodynamic factors as predictive of graft failure (P = 0.024) and death (P = 0.018). In the multivariate analysis, which was adjusted for recipient age and donor and recipient gender, hemodynamic risk factors and Model for End-Stage Liver. Disease score in the recipient were the only variables independently associated with graft failure (P = 0.006, P = 0.012, negatively). Finally, we observed a reduction of dropout from the list to 9% from 14.1% (P = 0.04) and of mortality on the list to 32.55% from 41.01% (P = 0.11). Critical use of ECD liver grafts allowed recipients in the waiting list to have a greater chance of being transplanted.     

The difficulty in defining extended donor criteria for liver grafts: the Eurotransplant experience

Donor criteria for liver grafts have been expanded because of organ shortage. Currently, no exact definitions for extended donor grafts have been established. The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of donor‐specific risk factors, independent of recipient characteristics. In collaboration with Eurotransplant and European Liver Transplant Register, solely donor‐specific parameters were correlated with 1‐year survival following liver transplantation. Analyses of 4701 donors between 2000 and 2005 resulted in the development of a nomogram to estimate graft survival for available grafts. Predictions by nomogram were compared to those by Donor Risk Index (DRI). In the multivariate analysis, cold ischemic time (CIT), highest sodium, cause of donor death, γ‐glutamyl transferase (γ‐GT), and donor sex (female) were statistically significant factors for 3 months; CIT, γ‐GT, and cause of donor death for 12‐month survival. The median DRI of this study population was 1.45 (Q1: 1.17; Q3: 1.67). The agreement between the nomogram and DRI was weak (kappa = 0.23). Several donor‐specific risk factors were identified for early survival after liver transplantation. The provided nomogram will support quick organ quality assessment. Nevertheless, this study showed the difficulties of determining an exact definition of extended criteria donors.     

2,500 living donor kidney transplants: a single-center experience

OBJECTIVE: To review a single center's experience and outcome with living donor transplants. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Outcome after living donor transplants is better than after cadaver donor transplants. Since the inception of the authors' program, they have performed 2,540 living donor transplants. For the most recent cohort of recipients, improvements in patient care and immunosuppressive protocols have improved outcome. In this review, the authors analyzed outcome in relation to protocol. METHODS: The authors studied patient and graft survival by decade. For those transplanted in the 1990s, the impact of immunosuppressive protocol, donor source, diabetes, and preemptive transplantation was analyzed. The incidence of rejection, posttransplant steroid-related complications, and return to work was determined. Finally, multivariate analysis was used to study risk factors for worse 1-year graft survival and, for those with graft function at 1 year, to study risk factors for worse long-term survival. RESULTS: For each decade since 1960, outcome has improved after living donor transplants. Compared with patients transplanted in the 1960s, those transplanted in the 1990s have better 8-year actuarial patient and graft survival rates. Death with function and chronic rejection have continued to be a major cause of graft loss, whereas acute rejection has become a rare cause of graft loss. Cardiovascular deaths have become a more predominant cause of patient death; infection has decreased. Donor source (e.g., ideally HLA-identical sibling) continues to be important. For living donor transplants, rejection and graft survival rates are related to donor source. The authors show that patients who had preemptive transplants or less than 1 year of dialysis have better 5-year graft survival and more frequently return to full-time employment. Readmission and complications remain problems; of patients transplanted in the 1990s, only 36% never required readmission. Similarly, steroid-related complications remain common. The authors' multivariate analysis shows that the major risk factor for worse 1-year graft survival was delayed graft function. For recipients with 1-year graft survival, risk factors for worse long-term outcome were pretransplant smoking, pretransplant peripheral vascular disease, pretransplant dialysis for more than 1 year, one or more acute rejection episodes, and donor age older than 55. CONCLUSIONS: These data show that the outcome of living donor transplants has continued to improve. However, for living donors, donor source affects outcome. The authors also identify other major risk factors affecting both short- and long-term outcome.     

One hundred nine living donor liver transplants in adults and children: a single-center experience

OBJECTIVE: To summarize the evolution of a living donor liver transplant program and the authors' experience with 109 cases. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The authors' institution began to offer living donor liver transplants to children in 1993 and to adults in 1998. METHODS: Donors were healthy, ages 18 to 60 years, related or unrelated, and ABO-compatible (except in one case). Donor evaluation was thorough. Liver biopsy was performed for abnormal lipid profiles or a history of significant alcohol use, a body mass index more than 28, or suspected steatosis. Imaging studies included angiography, computed tomography, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, and magnetic resonance imaging. Recipient evaluation and management were the same as for cadaveric transplant. RESULTS: After ABO screening, 136 potential donors were evaluated for 113 recipients; 23 donors withdrew for medical or personal reasons. Four donor surgeries were aborted; 109 transplants were performed. Fifty children (18 years or younger) received 47 left lateral segments and 3 left lobes; 59 adults received 50 right lobes and 9 left lobes. The average donor hospital stay was 6 days. Two donors each required one unit of banked blood. Right lobe donors had three bile leaks from the cut surface of the liver; all resolved. Another right lobe donor had prolonged hyperbilirubinemia. Three donors had small bowel obstructions; two required operation. All donors are alive and well. The most common indications for transplant were biliary atresia in children (56%) and hepatitis C in adults (40%); 35.6% of adults had hepatocellular carcinoma. Biliary reconstructions in all children and 44 adults were with a Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy; 15 adults had duct-to-duct anastomoses. The incidence of major vascular complications was 12% in children and 11.8% in adult recipients. Children had three bile leaks (6%) and six (12%) biliary strictures. Adult patients had 14 (23.7%) bile leaks and 4 (6.8%) biliary strictures. Patient and graft survival rates were 87.6% and 81%, respectively, at 1 year and 75.1% and 69.6% at 5 years. In children, patient and graft survival rates were 89.9% and 85.8%, respectively, at 1 year and 80.9% and 78% at 5 years. In adults, patient and graft survival rates were 85.6% and 77%, respectively, at 1 year. CONCLUSION: Living donor liver transplantation has become an important option for our patients and has dramatically changed our approach to patients with liver failure. The donor surgery is safe and can be done with minimal complications. We expect that living donor liver transplants will represent more than 50% of our transplants within 3 years.     

Optimal utilization of extended hepatic grafts

Orthotopic liver transplantation has emerged as the standard treatment for end-stage liver disease. In the United States, the number of listed patients has tripled in the last two decades. Organ availability during the same period has plateaued at approximately 6000 grafts annually, resulting in a fivefold increase in wait-list mortality. The problem is not specific to the United States; European and Asian registries report similar shortages. Donor pool expansion strategies such as the use of living donors, cadaveric split livers, and “extended criteria donors”; (ECD) are being pursued. Used judiciously, ECD grafts provide an opportunity for addressing the shortage. Although there is no universally accepted definition of ECD, the term generally refers to donor factors predisposing recipients to poor initial graft function and/or increased long-term risk. These factors include advanced donor age, hypernatremia, prolonged warm ischemic time, pressor requirement, and donation after cardiac death. The transplant community is scrutinizing all factors to evaluate the degree of risk they impart on the recipient and the extent to which grafts can be “matched”; to maintain acceptable outcomes. We review the importance of selected factors and the impact of a “matching”; strategy to minimize recipient risk while optimizing graft use.     

Considering extended right lobe grafts as major extended donor criteria in liver transplantation is justified

The outcomes of split-liver transplantation are controversial. This study compared outcomes and morbidity after extended right lobe liver transplantation (ERLT) and whole liver transplantation (WLT) in adults. MEDLINE and Web of Science databases were searched systematically and unrestrictedly for studies on ERLT and its impact on graft and patient survival, and postoperative complications. Graft loss and patient mortality odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were assessed by meta-analyses using Mantel–Haenszel tests with a random-effects model. Vascular and biliary complications, primary nonfunction, 3-month, 1-, and 3-year graft and patient survival, and retransplantation after ERLT and WLT were analyzed. The literature search yielded 10 594 articles. After exclusion, 22 studies (n = 75 799 adult transplant patients) were included in the analysis. ERLT was associated with lower 3-month (OR = 1.43, 95% CI = 1.09–1.89, P = 0.01), 1-year (OR = 1.46, 95% CI = 1.08–1.97, P = 0.01), and 3-year (OR = 1.37, 95% CI = 1.01–1.84, P = 0.04) graft survival. WL grafts were less associated with retransplantation (OR = 0.57; 95% CI = 0.41–0.80; P < 0.01), vascular complications (OR = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.38–0.74, P < 0.01) and biliary complications (OR = 0.67; 95% CI = 0.47–0.95; P = 0.03). Considering ERLT as major Extended Donor Criteria is justified because ERL grafts are associated with vasculobiliary complications and the need for retransplantation, and have a negative influence on graft survival.     

Living donor liver transplantation in children with cholestatic liver disease: a single-center experience

Objectives

Cholestatic liver disease (CLD) is the main indication for liver transplantation in children. This retrospective study evaluated the outcomes of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in children with CLD.

Methods

One hundred fifty-nine children with CLD who underwent 164 LDLT between May 2001 and May 2011 were evaluated. Their original diseases were biliary atresia (n = 145, 91%), Alagille syndrome (n = 8, 5%), primary sclerosing cholangitis (n = 2), and the others (n = 4). The mean age and body weight of the recipients at LDLT was 42 ± 53 months and 14.0 ± 11.0 kg, respectively.

Results

Parents were living donors in 98%. The left lateral segment was the most common type of graft (77%). There were no reoperations and no mortality in any living donor. Recipients' postoperative surgical complications consisted mainly of hepatic arterial problems (7%), hepatic vein stenosis (5%), portal vein stenosis (13%), biliary stricture (18%), intestinal perforation (3%). The overall rejection rate was 31%. Cytomegalovirus infection and Epstein-Barr virus disease were observed in 26% and 5%, respectively. Retransplantation was performed five times in four patients; the main cause was hepatic vein stenosis (n = 3). Four patients died; the main cause was gastrointestinal perforation (n = 2). The body height of Alagille syndrome patients less than 2 years old significantly improved compared with older patients after LDLT. The 1-, 5-, and 10-year patient survival rates were 98%, 97%, and 97%, respectively.

Conclusions

LDLT for CLD is an effective treatment with excellent long-term outcomes.     

Living donor liver transplantation: early single-center experience

Adult living donor liver transplantation (ALDLT) is an accepted procedure to overcome the organ shortage. The advantages of ALDLT must be balanced against the first concern of donor safety. We analyzed the results of our early experience among a series of eight ALDLT performed between April 2001 and October 2003. All patients were listed as United Network for Organ Sharing UNOS status 2b and 3. Transplant recipients consisted of four men and four women. The living donors included four sons, three daughters, and one son-in-law (ages 20 to 45 years). One donor was anti-HBc-positive and negative for hepatitis B virus-DNA by polymerase chain reaction analysis in serum and in liver tissue. GR/WR >0.8 and fatty liver <10% were considered suitable for the hepatectomy. Residual left lobe volume was at least 33%. No exogenous blood and blood products were transfused into the donors and a cell-saver device was used in all donors (blood loss 490 +/- 160 mL). All procedures were right lobe hepatectomy; in one case the middle hepatic vein was withdrawn with the right graft. The mean ischemia time was 1.5 +/- 0.5 hours. All donors survived the procedure. Median hospital stay was 8.5 +/- 2.1 days in all donors but one who had a long stay because of drug-related hepatitis. One graft was lost and one donor aborted because of preoperative overestimated volumetry. Complications were experienced by two donors (25%). Five recipients (62.5%) experienced major complications; one patient underwent retransplantation because of donor graft loss. Two biliary and two vascular complications (33.3%) occurred in three patients. No perioperative death occurred. Two patients died at 9 and 10 months after transplant because of heart and respiratory failure in the first case and tumor recurrence in the second. One-year actuarial survival is 75%. ALDLT using right lobe has gained acceptance to overcome the organ shortage. Donor selection criteria must be stringent with respect to residual donor hepatic volume, steatosis, and liver function.     

The marginal donor: a single-center experience in orthotopic liver transplantation

The use of marginal donors has become more common worldwide due to the sharp increase in recipients with a consequent shortage of suitable organs. The definition of "marginal donor" has not been reached by all centers. We herein analyzed our single-center experience over the last 3 years in liver transplantation (OLT) to evaluate the outcomes of using a high percentage of so-called "marginal donors", according to the current classification from the National (Italian) Center of Transplantation (CNT). Among the 78 OLT performed in 77 patients from January 1, 2003 to October 31, 2005, donor livers were divided into three groups according to the CNT classification. We evaluated donor variables, cold ischemia time (CIT), warm ischemia time (WIT), MELD score, and length of hospital stay. Histologic graft steatosis was correlated with estimated steatosis by ultrasound. There were no differences among the three graft recipient groups concerning CIT, WIT, MELD score, and the length of hospital stay. Steatosis is indicated in all series as a definite variable for a higher risk of postoperative mortality. CIT is necessarily related to donor retrieval policy and organization. Donor age seemed also to be related to a possible increase in postoperative mortality, but there are significant variations in the definition of the age limit. We failed to observe a correlation between a higher mortality rate and any of the variables currently listed to define a "marginal donor." A shorter CIT seemed to positively influence the role played by the other variables identifying a "marginal liver." Finally, the use of HCV(+) or HBV(+) grafts did not lead to an increased mortality.     

Technical implications of living donor liver transplantation: a single-center experience

Liver transplantation for end-stage liver disease is the treatment of choice in current surgical practice. However, the shortage of cadaveric organs has limited this treatment option for many years. Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) may be an option to overcome the organ shortage. In the present series we report a single-center experience with 39 LDLT performed from March 2000 to June 2003. The main indications for LDLT was hepatitis B cirrhosis (11 patients). The recipient hepatectomy was performed with caval preservation. The hepatic vein anastomosis was performed either to recipient hepatic vein or inferior vena cava. The portal vein anastomosis was performed either to the recipient's main or right portal branch. Biliary diversion was performed to the recipient biliary ducts if possible, otherwise to a jejunal loop in Roux-en-Y fashion. The survival rate at the end of one year was 71%. The leading cause of mortality was sepsis in five patients. Biliary complications developed in 20% of the recipients. All bile leaks were from the Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy. Hepatic artery thrombosis was diagnosed in four patients by loss of hepatic blood flow on Doppler ultrasound. LDLT is a major surgical option for end-stage liver disease, particularly for countries with low rates of organ donation. However, there are technical challenges to be overcome such as small vessels from segmental grafts and multiple small bile ducts.     

The first one thousand liver transplants in Turin: a single-center experience in Italy

The first Italian liver transplant center to reach the goal of 1000 procedures was Turin. The paper reports this single-center experience, highlighting the main changes that have occurred over time. From 1990 to 2002, 1000 consecutive liver transplants were performed in 910 patients, mainly cirrhotics. Surgical technique was based on the preservation of the retrohepatic vena cava of the recipient. The veno-venous bypass was used in 30 cases only and abandoned since 1997. Operating time, warm ischemia time and length of hospital stay significantly decreased over the years, while operating room extubation became routine. Immunosuppression pivoted on cyclosporine A. Management of retransplantations, marginal grafts, and of HCV-positive, HBV-positive and hepatocellular carcinoma recipients were optimized. Median follow-up of the patients was 41 months. Overall survival rates at 1, 5 and 10 years were 87%, 78% and 72% respectively. Survival rates obtained in the second half of the cases (1999-2002 period) were significantly better than those obtained in the first half (1990-1998 period) (90% vs. 83% at 1 year and 81% vs. 76% at 5 years respectively). Increasing experience in liver transplant surgery and postoperative care allowed standardization of the procedure and expansion of the activity, with parallel improvement of the results.     

Long-term results of living-related donor liver graft transplantation: a single-center analysis of 110 transplants

BACKGROUND: Difficulties of cadaveric donation and serious donor shortage have led to the development and popularization of living-related donor liver graft transplantation (LRLT). Because the history of this procedure is rather short, important aspects specific to this procedure have not been sufficiently documented. The objective of this study was to analyze a single center's 10-year experience with 110 LRLT in pediatric and adult patients with end-stage liver diseases. METHODS: The medical records of 110 consecutive patients who underwent LRLT were reviewed. The recipients were comprised of 72 children and 38 adults. The graft volume corresponded to 26-192% of the recipient's standard liver volume. The relationship between pretransplant covariates and patient and graft survival was analyzed. Actuarial patient/graft survival rates were determined at 1, 3, and 5 years. The type and incidence of posttransplant complications were analyzed, as was long-term graft function. RESULTS: The 1-, 3-, and 5-year actuarial patient and graft survival rates were 88%, 85%, and 85%, respectively. Log-rank test demonstrated that ABO-compatibility predicted patient survival rate, whereas patient age, underlying disease, patient's clinical status, donor-recipient relation, donor age, and graft volume/standard liver volume ratio did not. Long-term liver function remains excellent. All the donors have returned to normal daily lives with an uneventful course. CONCLUSIONS: LRLT is an efficacious procedure that provides excellent short-term and long-term survival. The indication criteria for both recipient and donor were legitimate in this series, except for transplant across ABO-incompatibility. Cautious expansion of this procedure may be justified under the situation of serious shortage of cadaveric donor.     

Hepatopulmonary syndrome after living donor liver transplantation and deceased donor liver transplantation: a single-center experience.

Hepatopulmonary syndrome (HPS) is a progressive, debilitating complication of end-stage liver disease. In contrast to the well-established reversal of HPS after deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT), little has been written about the natural course of HPS after the newer procedure of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). We describe HPS in a small series of 4 liver transplant recipients (2 DDLT; 2 LDLT) at a single center. Before transplantation, these 4 patients had a mean shunt fraction of 23.6 +/- 14.3% and a mean PaO2 of 58.5 +/- 11.3 mm Hg. All 4 patients used supplemental oxygen before transplantation. Sixteen weeks after transplantation, all 4 patients had normalized or improved shunt fraction and PaO2. These patients regained normal pulmonary function within a few months, despite the period of hepatic regeneration after LDLT. In conclusion, both DDLT and LDLT are associated with rapid and dramatic reversal of HPS.     

Living donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: a single-center experience in Taiwan

BACKGROUND: Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) demonstrates certain survival benefits over deceased donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) but there is no consensus on criteria for the use of LDLT for HCC for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) taking into account strategies to improve survival. METHODS: Thirty-five patients (89% men) underwent LDLT for HCC. The mean age was 51 years (range, 22-61). The median disease severity scores were B, 11-20, and 2B for Child-Turcotte-Pugh, Model for End-stage Liver Disease, and United Network for Organ Sharing, respectively. The transplant records were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: All were within Milan criteria at time of transplantation. A novel approach to downstaging tumors initially beyond the Milan criteria was evaluated using transarterial embolization or percutaneous ethanol injection. Our initial results were encouraging as recipients whose tumors had been downstaged had not had recurrence to date. Seven (20%) patients underwent hepatectomy for HCC before undergoing transplant. The overall mean posttransplant follow-up in this series was 40.3 months (range, 23-75). The overall posttransplant complication rate requiring intervention was 11%. There was only one malignancy recurrence for an overall recurrence rate of 3%. Vascular invasion and small- for-size transplants did not seem to influence tumor recurrence. The nonestimated recipient 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year survivals were 98%, 96%, and 90%, respectively. CONCLUSION: This review emphasizes the need for early disease recognition and prompt intervention when Milan criteria are met to improve survival from HCC after LDLT.     

Vascular complications after living donor liver transplantation: a Brazilian, single-center experience

Background

In living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), vascular complications are more frequently seen than in deceased donor transplantation. Early arterial, portal vein, or hepatic vein thromboses are complications that can lead to graft loss and patient death. The aim of this study was to assess the incidence, treatment, and outcome of vascular complications after LDLT in a single Brazilian center.

Methods

Between December 2001 and December 2010, we performed 130 LDLT. Sixty-four recipients were children (27 weighing <10 kg).

Results

Nine recipients had vascular complications. Hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) occurred in 4 (3.1%), portal vein thrombosis (PVT) in 3 (2.3%), and hepatic vein thrombosis (HVT) and hepatic arterial stenosis (HAS) in 1 (0.8%) patient each. Complications were identified by Doppler and confirmed by angiography or angiotomography. Patients with HAT were listed for retransplantation. One died before retransplant. Two children were submitted to retransplantation; one is still alive, with neurologic sequelae. One adult with HAT was retransplanted with a deceased donor graft and is doing well 58 months after surgery. Two patients with PVT died as a consequence of graft malfunction. In the other case, portal vein arterialization was performed, but patient died 11 months posttransplant. HVT was detected after cardiac reanimation and was treated with an endovascular stent. This patient died 3 months after LDLT. HAS was diagnosed after liver abscess development and was successfully treated by endovascular angioplasty. No recurrence was observed after 22 months. Follow-up ranged from 9 to 117 months.

Conclusion

Pediatric patients are more prone to develop vascular complications after LDLT. Long-term survival was statistically lower for recipients with vascular complications (33.3% vs 77.7%; P = .008).     

Biliary complications after 52 adult living donor liver transplantations: a single-center experience

Objective

The incidence of biliary complications after adult living donor liver transplantation (ALDLT) are still high even though various devices have been reported to overcome them.

Method

From October 2000 to April 2007, we performed 52 ALDLTs which included 15 ABO-incompatible grafts. Median follow-up was 565 days. In 49 procedures, we used duct-to-duct anastmosis with a stent inserted in the recipient duct and out through the common bile duct wall as an external stent, and in 3 procedures, we used duct-to-jejunostomy anastomosis. We investigated postoperative biliary complications and their management.

Results

Forty-four patients received right lobe grafts and 8 received left lobe grafts. Among patients in whom duct-to-duct anastomosis was used, nine (20.5%) developed biliary complications including bile leakage in five and biliary strictures in four. All bile leakage was treated with reoperation. Three biliary strictures were treated with stent placement, and one biliary stricture was treated with magnetic compression anastomosis. Among the three patients in whom duct-to-jejunostomy was used, two (66.7%) had bile leakage and stricture, respectively. Two of four ABO-incompatible patients (50%) had hepatic artery thrombosis with biliary complications, a high incidence.

Conclusion

In our series of ABO-incompatible patients undergoing ALDLT, those who developed hepatic artery thrombosis exhibited a high incidence of biliary complications.     

Laparoscopic right donor nephrectomy: a large single-center experience

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic procurement of right donor kidneys is frequently avoided or performed using hand-assist devices because of concerns regarding donor safety, adequate exposure, and vessel length. The present study describes the authors' large series of right donor nephrectomies performed laparoscopically without the use of hand ports or other manual assist devices. METHODS: The authors retrospectively analyzed all right laparoscopic donor nephrectomies performed at their center from November 1, 1999, to February 20, 2004. Study variables included operative times, blood loss, hospital stay, graft function, and donor and recipient complications. Left donor nephrectomies performed during the same period served as controls. RESULTS: Of 387 laparoscopic kidney procurements, 54 (14 %) were right nephrectomies. Blood loss, extraction times, length of stay, and overall complication rates were similar between right and left donor groups. The mean operative time in the right nephrectomy group was significantly shorter than in the left nephrectomy group (169 +/- 25 and 186 +/- 29 min, respectively; P = 0.003). Graft function 1 month after transplantation and the incidence of delayed graft function were similar in both groups. There was one graft loss caused by thrombosis in the left nephrectomy group; other graft-related complications in the recipients were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: This large single-center experience demonstrates that laparoscopic right donor nephrectomy performed without hand-assist devices is safe and yields kidneys with excellent function. The authors conclude that selection of the appropriate kidney for donation using this approach can be based on the same criteria that have traditionally governed open donor nephrectomy.     

Use of extended right grafts from in situ split livers in adult liver transplantation: a comparison with whole-liver transplants

INTRODUCTION: We report our experience of in situ split-liver transplantation (SLT) for adult patients and compare the results with those achieved with whole-liver transplantation (WLT). METHOD: From November 1997 to December 2003, 109 liver transplantation were performed in 104 adult patients including 90 WLT (83%) and 19 SLT (17%) grafts. Fifteen extended right grafts (ERG, segments I + IV to VIII) were obtained with in situ split-liver procedures, generating also left lateral segment grafts, which were transplanted at our institution or elsewhere. Four left lobe (LL, segments I to IV) and right lobe (segments V to VIII) grafts were obtained by a modified in situ procedure for adult recipients. UNOS status, percentage of primary or secondary transplantation, and underlying liver disease were similar among patients receiving whole versus split grafts. Donors were older in whole than ERG cohorts (53 vs 26 years, P < .001). Procurement parameters and intraoperative profiles of transplant procedure were comparable among the groups. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 18 months (range: 1 to 73). Four patients with whole (4%) and no patient with ERG underwent retransplantation (P = NS). One- and 3-year patient survivals were 86% and 79% with WLT versus 93% and 93% with ERG (P = NS). One- and 3-year graft survivals were 84% and 75% with WLT versus 93%, and 93% with ERG (P = NS). Incidence of vascular complications was 8% with WLT, 13% with ERG (P = NS). The incidence of biliary complications was 13% in WLT, 27% in ERG (P = NS). CONCLUSIONS: The use of ERG from in situ split livers for adult transplantation allowed us to obtain results comparable or even better than those obtained with WLT. Split-liver transplantation is an effective, safe mechanism to expand the cadaveric donor pool.