The utility of PAX-2 in distinguishing metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma from its morphologic mimics: an immunohistochemical study with comparison to renal cell carcinoma marker

PAX-2 is a homeogene expressed during kidney development. Although immunohistochemical expression of PAX-2 has been described in a variety of primary renal cell carcinoma (RCC) subtypes and in metastatic RCC, its specificity as a marker of renal lineage in a metastatic setting has not been fully evaluated. In addition, its utility has not been directly compared with the most widely used antibody in this setting, renal cell carcinoma marker (RCCma). We studied PAX-2 expression in metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CC-RCC) and in a variety of nonrenal neoplasms with clear cytoplasm that may potentially mimic CC-RCC. Archival material from 27 CC-RCCs metastatic to various organs and 50 close morphologic mimics of CC-RCC were retrieved. Immunohistochemistry with PAX-2 and RCCmapi antibodies was performed on each case. Nuclear staining (PAX-2) or membranous staining (RCCma) was scored semiquantitatively. Twenty-three of 27 (85%) metastatic CC-RCCs showed nuclear immunoreactivity for PAX-2, whereas RCCma reactivity was found in 19 of 27 (70%). The immunoprofiles of the metastatic CC-RCC were PAX-2+/RCCma+: 19 of 27 (70%), PAX-2+/RCCma-: 5 of 27 (19%), PAX-2-/RCCma+: 2 of 27 (7%), and PAX-2-/RCCma-: 1 of 27 (4%). Five of the 50 mimics of CC-RCC (10%) had at least focal nuclear reactivity with PAX-2, including 1 of 3 parathyroid carcinomas (33%), 3 of 7 clear cell carcinomas of the ovary (43%), and the 1 clear cell papillary cystadenoma of the epididymis. Membranous RCCma reactivity was identified in 26 of the 50 mimics (52%). We conclude that PAX-2 is a useful marker for distinguishing metastatic CC-RCC from its potential morphologic mimics, but caution must be used in certain differential diagnostic settings where nonrenal tumors such as parathyroid carcinoma, ovarian clear cell carcinoma, and clear cell papillary cystadenoma of the epididymis were shown to express both PAX-2 and RCCma.     

同侧肾脏同时发生透明细胞型与乳头状肾细胞癌

目的探讨同侧肾脏发病并且相对独立的透明细胞型和肾乳头状细胞癌的临床病理特点及免疫表型,提高对该肿瘤的认识和诊断水平。方法本研究回顾了2例病理诊断为透明细胞型合并肾乳头状细胞癌的临床资料,通过光镜和免疫组织化学染色,针对肾细胞癌相关蛋白标志物[包括 Vimentin、CD10、CK（AE1/AE3）、CK7、CK8/18、PAX2、PAX8、CAⅨ、AMACR]进行了观察和分析。结果2例患者为男性,年龄分别为70、63岁。2例患者的两处独立肿瘤均位于左侧肾脏,镜下观察均可见两处独立肿瘤,肿瘤间隔有正常肾脏组织,分别为乳头状肾细胞癌及透明细胞型肾细胞癌,且免疫组化显示2例患者肿瘤的表型一致。结论单侧肾脏肾透明细胞癌合并肾乳头状细胞癌是一种少见的临床现象,这种现象的存在以及类似的免疫组化表型提示透明细胞型肾细胞癌和乳头状肾细胞癌在发生过程中可能存在着内部的联系。     

附睾乳头状囊腺瘤伴睾丸萎缩1例报告

附睾乳头状囊腺瘤是一种少见的良性肿瘤 ,可能与vonHippel Lindau综合征并存。本文报告 1例附睾乳头状囊腺瘤病例 ,男性 ,38岁 ,瘤体位于右侧附睾全段 ,呈球形包块状 ,大小约 5 .0cm× 4 .0cm× 4 .0cm ,包膜完整 ,病理检查可见典型乳头样增生的腺样结构及高柱状透亮粘液腺细胞 ,部分腺腔见胶质样嗜酸性物质。该病例的特点为附睾乳头状囊腺瘤引起同侧睾丸的压迫性萎缩     

Von Hippel-Lindau disease associated with renal cell carcinoma and bilateral cystadenoma of the epididymis: a case report]

We present a case report of von Hippel-Lindau disease associated with renal cell carcinoma and bilateral cystadenoma of the epididymis. A 26-year-old man appeared with painless tumors of the bilateral scrotal contents. Ultrasonography and other radiographic examinations including computed tomographic scan and dripinfusion pyelography showed multiocular tumors in the bilateral epididymis and a right renal tumor 3 cm in diameter. The tumors of the bilateral epididymis were surgically resected and of the right renal tumor enucleated. Histopathological examination revealed cystadenoma of the epididymis and renal cell carcinoma (clear cell carcinoma, G1, pT1a). He has not received adjuvant therapy, and is doing well with no evidence of metastatic disease 2 years after surgery.     

Effect of papillary and chromophobe cell type on disease-free survival after nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma

Background The clinical staging of renal cortical tumors traditionally has not evaluated the potential effect of histological subtypes on survival. Evidence suggests that conventional clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and nonconventional clear cell RCC (chromophobe and papillary) have different metastatic potential. Using a large renal tumor database, we examined the effect of tumor histology on the pattern of metastasis and patient survival. Methods All patients with nonmetastatic renal cortical tumors undergoing partial or radical nephrectomy were identified from a renal tumor database between July 1989 and July 2002. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression tests were used for statistical analysis. Results Analysis revealed 1057 patients: 794 with conventional clear cell RCC, 157 with papillary RCC, and 106 with chromophobe RCC. Metastasis occurred in 95 conventional clear cell RCC, 9 papillary RCC, and 6 chromophobe RCC. Metastasis occurred in 95 conventional clear cell RCC, 9 papillary RCC, and 6 chromophobe RCC with a median follow-up of 34.6, 43.0, and 33.2 months, respectively. Using log-rank analysis, chromophobe and papillary RCC were associated with an improved disease-free survival at 5 years (P=.009 and .015, respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed tumor size, stage, and chromophobe histology as significant variables for disease progression. Conclusions Renal cortical tumors have distinct histological subtypes with varying degrees of metastatic potential. Conventional clear cell RCC, which comprises two thirds of renal cortical tumors presenting with localized disease, has a less favorable outcome when compared with papillary and chromophobe RCC. Controlling for size and stage, chromophobe, and not papillary, RCC was a significant variable for disease progression compared with conventional clear cell RCC. Knowledge of renal cortical tumor histological subtype is critical for projecting prognosis, tailoring follow-up strategies, and designing clinical trials. Presented at the 56th Annual Cancer Symposium, Society of Surgical Oncology, San Diego, CA, March 5–9, 2003.     

晚期肾癌索拉非尼治疗后形态学改变二例报告

目的 探讨晚期肾癌患者索拉非尼治疗后形态学及肾癌相关蛋白表达改变的特点.方法 晚期肾癌索拉非尼治疗后的组织2例,行HE染色病理学检查,应用国内常用组织学分级系统评价治疗反应,免疫组织化学方法检测原发性肿瘤组织与复发或转移灶索拉非尼治疗后的免疫表型改变. 结果 2例患者标本病理类型与治疗前无改变,均出现不同程度的治疗反应,表现为肿瘤细胞轻度退行性改变,肿瘤组织可见明显坏死及间质纤维化.免疫组织化学分析结果显示索拉非尼治疗前后肾癌相关抗原Vimentin、AE1/AE3、CK7、CK8、CK18及CD10蛋白表达无明显变化,索拉非尼治疗后肾癌组织中血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)、VEGF受体-2(VEGFR2)、p53及Ki-67蛋白表达增强,而Bcl-2蛋白表达降低. 结论 索拉非尼治疗后可引起转移癌或复发肿瘤与原发肿瘤之间的形态学差异,以瘤细胞退行性改变及间质纤维化为主要表现,但转移性肾癌病理组织学类型无改变.VEGF、VEGFR2等表达的变化可能与索拉非尼疗效相关.     

CD70: a new tumor specific biomarker for renal cell carcinoma

PURPOSE: To date there have been no specific tumor markers available for the differential diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). In an earlier study we identified high RNA expression of CD70 in clear cell RCC. CD70 is a type II transmembrane protein belonging to the tumor necrosis factor family. It represents the ligand for CD27, a glycosylated transmembrane protein of the tumor necrosis factor receptor family. To our knowledge the function of CD70 in solid tumors is not known. In the current study we analyzed CD70 protein expression in different RCC subtypes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 68 tumor samples of different histopathological subtypes were investigated by immunochemistry, including 41 clear cell, 19 papillary and 5 chromophobe RCCs, and 3 oncocytomas as well as their normal tissue counterparts. Immunochemistry was performed on frozen tissue samples using monoclonal antibody against CD70. RESULTS: None of the normal kidney tissues showed CD70 expression. In contrast, all clear cell RCCs expressed CD70 at a high level. Positive immunostaining was observed in 1 papillary (5%) and in 1 chromophobe (20%) RCC. Five papillary tumor samples (26%) showed focal staining in less than 5% of cells. All other samples were negative for CD70. CONCLUSIONS: Our study identified CD70 as a new specific tumor marker for clear cell RCC. This new marker can be used for differential diagnosis in cases of uncertain histological classification. The function of this protein in tumorigenesis and its use as a diagnostic marker in serum and urine or as a therapeutic tool must be investigated in further studies.     

Renal cell carcinomas in children and young adults: increased incidence of papillary architecture and unique subtypes.

Renal cell carcinomas in children and young adults are rare, and the pathologic features of these tumors have not been well described. We reviewed 24 renal cell carcinomas in children and young adults ages 6 to 29 years, 14 of whom were younger than 18 years of age. Fourteen were female. In 19 (79%) of 24 cases, the tumor met histologic criteria for papillary renal cell carcinoma, with at least 50% papillary architecture. Four of the remaining five cases were typical clear cell tumors in patients known to have von Hippel Lindau syndrome, and one case was of chromophobe type. In the papillary tumors, calcifications, high nuclear grade, extracapsular extension (American Joint Commission on Cancer stage T3), and lymph node metastases were common. Among these papillary tumors, four distinct histologic patterns could be identified. Collecting duct-like tumors (two cases) involved the large collecting ducts, were multifocal and predominantly papillary, and had focal tubular and solid areas. These tumors were reactive for epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) and keratins, including CK7, but negative for Ulex europeaus and high molecular weight keratin 34BE12. Voluminous cell tumors (four cases) were composed of cells with extremely voluminous clear cytoplasm and, although predominantly papillary, had areas that also resembled clear cell tumors. These tumors were reactive for keratins AE1/AE3 but were otherwise negative for all other keratins, EMA, and U. europeaus. One of these tumors showed an X;7 translocation. Adult type tumors (12 cases) resembled papillary tumors of adults. These tumors were reactive for EMA and keratins, including CK7, and all but one were negative for U. europeaus and keratin 34BE12. This last case had trisomies of chromosomes 7, 16, 17, and 20. The final neuroendocrinelike case was multifocal, organoid, and composed of nests of small cells in a neuroendocrinelike pattern. Three of 13 patients were alive with disease at last follow-up, and three additional patients died of disease, all within 2 years. Progression was highly associated with lymph node involvement at the time of resection. We conclude that the clinicopathologic features of renal cell carcinomas in children and young adults differ from those arising in older adults. These tumors are characteristically high-grade, high-stage, papillary tumors with numerous calcifications, and several subtypes can be identified based on histologic, immunohistochemical, and cytogenetic features. Some subtypes appear to be unique to this age group.     

Beta defensin-1, parvalbumin,and vimentin: a panel of diagnostic immunohistochemical markers for renal tumors derived from gene expression profiling studies using cDNA microarrays

The common histopathologic subtypes of renal epithelial neoplasms include conventional, or clear cell, renal cell carcinoma (RCC), papillary RCC, chromophobe RCC, and renal oncocytoma. These subtypes differ clinically and pathologically, making accurate classification important. However, this differential diagnosis can be challenging because of overlapping morphology, suggesting a potential utility for ancillary immunohistochemical markers. We used cDNA microarrays to identify candidate markers for distinguishing renal tumor subtypes. In this report we validated differential expression of three candidate markers, beta defensin-1, parvalbumin, and vimentin, and evaluated the use of this immunohistochemical panel as a potential diagnostic tool. Consistent with our cDNA microarray data, chromophobe RCCs and oncocytomas exhibited similar expression profiles: 8 of 8 examples of each subtype were immunohistochemically positive for beta defensin-1 and parvalbumin and negative for vimentin (sensitivity 100%, specificity 100%); 4 of 7 papillary RCCs were positive for beta defensin-1, parvalbumin, and vimentin (sensitivity 57%, specificity 97%); and 22 of 23 conventional RCCs were negative for beta defensin-1, parvalbumin, or both markers (sensitivity 96%, specificity 96%) as well as positive for vimentin (sensitivity 83%). The immunohistochemical panel distinguished renal tumor subtypes with greater specificity than any marker used alone. This work demonstrates that a useful panel of immunohistochemical markers can be derived from differential gene expression profiles determined using cDNA microarrays.     

Human kidney injury molecule-1 (hKIM-1): a useful immunohistochemical marker for diagnosing renal cell carcinoma and ovarian clear cell carcinoma

Human kidney injury molecule-1 (hKIM-1), a type I transmembrane glycoprotein expressed in injured renal proximal tubules, was also found in renal cell carcinoma (RCC). The current study attempts to evaluate the diagnostic utility of hKIM-1 in a large series of 480 neoplasms including defined subtypes of renal cell tumors, metastatic RCCs, and nonrenal tumors. Tissue microarray (TMA) sections containing 179 renal cell tumors (73 clear cell RCC, 30 papillary RCC, 16 chromophobe RCC, 15 oncocytoma, and 45 metastatic RCC) were included in this study. In addition, 80 cases of renal cell neoplasm and 221 nonrenal tumors in routine tissue sections were also included. Both TMA and routine sections were incubated with anti-hKIM-1 monoclonal antibody using an EnVision-HRP kit. The results demonstrated that a membranous/cytoplasmic staining pattern for hKIM-1 was observed in 54 of 73 (74%) clear cell RCCs and 28 of 30 (93%) papillary RCCs on TMA sections. Zero of 54 chromophobe RCCs and 4 of 41 (9.75%) oncocytomas were positive for hKIM-1 when combining TMA and routine sections. Similar staining results were observed in 35 of 45 (78%) metastatic RCCs. Data from cDNA microarray expression and Western blot demonstrated similar findings. Fifteen of 16 cases (93.8%) of clear cell carcinoma of the ovary demonstrated positive reactivity for hKIM-1. These data indicate that hKIM-1: (1) is a relatively sensitive and specific marker for papillary, clear cell, and metastatic RCCs, (2) can be used to distinguish clear cell from chromophobe RCC, and (3) may serve as a diagnostic marker for clear cell carcinoma of the ovary.     

Clear cell carcinoid tumor of the gallbladder: another distinctive manifestation of von Hippel-Lindau disease.

We describe a morphologically distinctive carcinoid tumor of the gallbladder that occurred in a 38-year-old man with von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) disease. The carcinoid tumor was composed predominantly of lipid-containing clear cells arranged in nests and tubules with pagetoid spread into the biliary epithelium and was interpreted as metastatic renal cell carcinoma. The neoplastic cells showed diffuse immunoreactivity for chromogranin, synaptophysin, cytokeratins (cytokeratin 7 and AE1/AE3) and, unexpectedly, for inhibin, but were negative for monoclonal carcinoembryonic antigen, serotonin and a variety of peptide hormones. This clear cell carcinoid tumor of the gallbladder was histologically similar to the recently described clear cell endocrine pancreatic tumor associated with VHL. Four cases of the latter tumor, which were also inhibin positive showed, in addition, focal and variable reactivity for the pancreatic hormones. Two classical carcinoid tumors of the gallbladder, two renal cell carcinomas associated with VHL and 11 of 13 sporadic endocrine pancreatic tumors (not associated with VHL) did not show immunoreactivity for inhibin. Inhibin appears to be an immunohistochemical marker for gallbladder clear cell carcinoid and clear cell endocrine pancreatic tumors associated with VHL and is a useful tool to distinguish these tumors from metastatic renal cell carcinoma. However, the basis for the inhibin positivity in these endocrine tumors is unknown.     

乳头状肾细胞癌临床分析

目的：总结分析乳头状肾细胞癌的临床特点,提高其诊治水平.方法：回顾性分析2003～2009年收治的乳头状肾细胞癌的临床资料.并与同期53例肾透明细胞癌比较.结果：乳头状肾细胞癌组患者年龄57.3（47～78）岁,皆为男性,占同期肾细胞癌9.4%.就诊时3例无症状,2例出现肉眼血尿,1例双侧腰痛伴腹部包块.肿瘤平均最大径为6.6（2.6～16.0）cm,未见多中心病灶.TNM分期：T1a N0 M0 3例,T1b N0 M0 1例,T2 No M0 2例 病理分型I型3例,Ⅱ型3例 Fuhrman分级Ⅱ级2例,Ⅲ级4例.与肾透明细胞癌相比,乳头状肾细胞癌好发于男性,影像学检查不具备恶性肿瘤特征,确诊有赖于病理和免疫组织化学检查.临床分期皆为I期或Ⅱ期.就诊时无一例出现远处转移.结论：乳头状肾细胞癌在临床表现上与肾透明细胞癌相似,但在影像学表现、病理形态及生物学行为上均与肾透明细胞癌有所不同.根治性肾切除术是目前首选治疗方式.靶向治疗有可能成为转移性乳头状肾细胞癌治疗的新方向.     

Role of immunohistochemistry in the evaluation of needle core biopsies in adult renal cortical tumors: an ex vivo study

Multiple therapeutic options for renal tumors that are now available have put pathologists under increasing pressure to render diagnosis on limited material. Results on biopsies by hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) have historically not been encouraging. Currently, multiple immunohistochemical markers with differential expression in these renal tumors are available. We studied the utility of such markers on needle biopsies that were obtained ex vivo. After nephrectomy, two 18-guage cores were obtained and processed routinely. Expressions of carbonic anhydrase (CA) IX, CD117, α-methylacyl-CoA racemase (AMACR), cytokeratin 7 (CK7), and CD10 were evaluated. Results, with or without immunostaining, were compared with the final nephrectomy diagnosis. We studied 145 tumors, including 119 renal cell carcinomas (83 clear cell, 18 papillary, 14 chromophobe, and 4 type unclassified), 11 oncocytomas, and 15 miscellaneous tumors. Adequate evaluable material was present in 123 (85%) cases. In such biopsies, 81% of cases were correctly classified by H&E alone, with correct diagnosis in 90% of cases in the most common tumor subtypes (clear cell, papillary and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma, and oncocytoma). By adding immunostains, the accuracy was 90% overall and 99% among the 4 most common subtypes. The following extent and patterns of immuneexpression were highly useful in the diagnoses: diffuse, membranous CAIX expression in clear cell renal cell carcinoma, diffuse positivity for AMACR in papillary renal cell carcinoma, distinct peripheral cytoplasmic accentuation for CD117 in chromophobe renal cell carcinoma, widespread and intense positivity for CK7 in chromophobe and papillary renal cell carcinoma, and diffuse membranous reactivity in clear cell and patchy/luminal in papillary renal cell carcinoma for CD10. In conclusion, utilizing immunostains improves classification of renal tumors on needle biopsy, which may be of particular help for pathologists with limited experience. Both extent and patterns must be considered for a definitive diagnosis.     

Clear cell tubulopapillary renal cell carcinoma: a study of 36 distinctive low-grade epithelial tumors of the kidney

Recently several low-grade renal cell tumors, distinct from those recognized by the 2004 World Health Organization classification of renal tumors, have been described. These tumors had similar clinicopathologic features, being low-stage tumors with cystic, tubuloacinar, and/or papillary architecture. The tumor cells were low grade with variable amounts of clear cytoplasm that was positive for cytokeratin 7 (CK7), but negative for CD10. Genetic changes characteristic of clear cell or papillary renal cell carcinoma were not seen in these tumors. We investigated the morphologic, immunohistochemical, and genetic features of 36 additional tumors. Immunohistochemistry was carried out for CK7, carbonic anhydrase 9, α-methylacyl-CoA racemase, CD10, TFE-3, and desmin. Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization was carried out with centromeric probes for chromosomes 3, 7, 17, and a subtelomeric probe for 3p25. Sequencing of von Hippel-Lindau gene and analysis of the methylation status of the promoter region was also carried out in 2 tumors. Thirty-six tumors from 33 patients (mean age: 60.4?, range: 26 to 88; 17 men and 16 women) were studied. Three patients had bilateral tumors and 1 patient had von Hippel-Lindau disease. Follow-up was available in 60% (20/33) of the patients for a mean of 27.4 (range 1 to 85) months. No patient had evidence of the disease after surgery except for the patient with von Hippel-Lindau disease, who was alive with stable disease in the contralateral kidney. All 36 tumors were small (mean size 2.4?cm; range 0.9 to 4.5?cm) and low stage (pT1). The majority was cystic and had prominent fibrous capsule and stroma. The tumors were composed of variable amount of cysts, papillae, tubules, acini, and solid nests. The most characteristic histologic features were branching tubules and acini and anastomosing clear cell ribbons with low-grade nuclei. All tumors were strongly positive for CK7 and variably positive for CA9, but largely negative for CD10, and negative for α-methylacyl-CoA racemase and TFE-3. All but 1 tumor had no gains of chromosomes 7 and 17 and deletion of 3p. Only 1 tumor had low copy number gains of chromosomes 7 and 17. VHL gene mutation and promoter methylation were negative in 2 tumors analyzed. We show that these tumors, which we term as "clear cell tubulopapillary renal cell carcinoma," constitute a unique subtype in the spectrum of renal epithelial neoplasia based on their characteristic morphologic and immunohistochemical features.     

Expression of CD10 and renal cell carcinoma marker in clear cell renal cell carcinoma: analysis on tissue arrays

ObjectiveCD10 and renal cell carcinoma (RCC) marker antibodies react against proteins of the epithelium of the renal proximal tubule, being expressed by renal cell carcinomas. The frequence and pattern of expression of both markers are analysed in a series of clear cell renal cell carcinomas.MethodTwo tissue arrays were used, which were composed of cylinders obtained with a 16G needle from 40 paraffin blocks that corresponded to clear cell renal cell carcinomas. The labeled streptavidin-biotin technique was performed (LSAB2, Dako) using CD10 and RCC monoclonal antibodies (Novocastra), testing different antigen retrieval methods for RCC. Immunoreactivity was evaluated as + (isolated cells or focal staining); ++ (moderate) and +++ (extense).ResultsThirty cases (75%) were positive for CD10: 12 +; 5 ++ and 13 +++. The best antigen retrieval method for RCC was a double enzyme digestion (trypsin + protease). Twenty cases (50%) were positive for RCC: 7 +; 5 ++ and 8 +++. Four cases out of the 20 immunoreactive for RCC were negative for CD10. The 16 remaining cases also expressed CD10.ConclusionsCD10 and RCC are often expressed by clear cell renal cell carcinomas, and they may be useful markers to suggest a renal origin of carcinomas. RCC is less sensitive than CD10. Staining for both of them is usually focal, and thus sensitivity of these techniques decreases when small samples are investigated, such as tissue arrays. The antigen retrieval method is essential for RCC immunohistochemical detection, obtaining the best results with the use of proteolytic enzymes.     

Diagnosing primary and metastatic renal cell carcinoma: the use of the monoclonal antibody 'Renal Cell Carcinoma Marker'.

The diagnosis of primary or metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) can be difficult, especially in small biopsies, because of the wide variety of histologic appearances and clinical presentations that RCC can assume. An immunomarker specific for RCC is currently not available. We tested the relevant diagnostic use of the Renal Cell Carcinoma Marker (RCC Ma), a monoclonal antibody, against a normal human proximal tubular brush border antigen. Immunostaining using RCC Ma and the avidin-biotin-peroxidase complex technique was performed on archival tissues from primary and metastatic tumors of renal or nonrenal origin. A total of 122 of 153 primary RCCs (79.7%) were positive [clear cell (84%), papillary (96%), chromophobe (45%), sarcomatoid (25%), and collecting duct (0%)], with > or =10% of tumor cells stained in 93% of cases. None of the 64 primary renal tumors other than RCC, including 15 oncocytomas, was positive. Fifteen of 146 (10.2%) nonrenal primary tumors were positive (5 of 17 breast tumors, 8 of 8 parathyroid adenomas, and 2 of 7 embryonal carcinomas). Forty-two of 63 (67%) metastatic RCCs were positive with > or =10% of cells being stained in 83% of them. Two of 108 (2%) metastases from tumors other than RCCs were positive, both of which were metastatic breast carcinomas; however, only 10% (2 of 19) of metastatic breast carcinomas were positive. RCC Ma is an excellent marker for primary RCC, which should facilitate its diagnosis in a small biopsy. Although RCC Ma remains highly specific (98%) for metastatic RCC, a negative result may not rule out metastatic RCC because of a rather low sensitivity and a focal staining pattern in some of the positive cases. RCC Ma may also facilitate the differential diagnosis between oncocytoma and other types of RCC when they are composed mostly of eosinophilic cells.     

Renal cell carcinoma presenting as a perineal mass: case report and review of the literature

Perineal involvement in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has not been reported. Vaginal metastases of RCC are also rare. We present a case of metastatic RCC, initially presenting as a perineal cyst. A 53-year-old woman presented with a perineal cyst, which was excised and diagnosed as clear cell carcinoma. A workup further revealed a vaginal mass and a renal tumor. A nephrectomy and local vaginal excision were performed, leading to the diagnosis of metastatic RCC. This case illustrates the variability in RCC presentation. Also, because vaginal clear cell carcinoma is rare, all such lesions should be considered potentially renal in origin.     

Differential diagnosis between monomorphic clear cell adenocarcinoma of salivary glands and renal (clear) cell carcinoma

Clear cell adenocarcinoma of salivary glands (CCASG) is a relatively rare tumor, composed entirely of clear cells of putative ductal origin. It bears striking morphologic similarities to renal cell carcinoma (RCC) of clear cell type on hematoxylin and eosin stains. Differentiation between CCASG and metastatic RCC to the salivary glands has been considered problematic or even impossible on morphologic grounds. We examined three cases of CCASG and 12 cases of RCC (6 primary and 6 metastatic) by hematoxylin and eosin staining, immunohistochemistry, and electron microscopy. Two distinctive immunohistochemical and ultrastructural patterns emerged from this analysis. CCASG showed positivity for high molecular weight cytokeratin and carcinoembryonic antigen and ultrastructurally showed prominent squamoid differentiation, glycogen pools, and absence of lipid. In contrast, RCC was characterized by positivity for vimentin and complete absence of staining for high molecular weight cytokeratin and carcinoembryonic antigen. On ultrastructural studies, RCC lacked any squamoid differentiation, and the tumor cells contained abundant cytoplasmic lipid in addition to glycogen. Thus, based on the consistent differences on the immunohistochemical staining patterns and their characteristic subcellular morphology, CCASG and RCC can be distinguished on pathologic evaluation. The different direction of differentiation of the cells in CCASG and RCC (i.e., ductal in the former and renal tubular and mesodermal in the latter) results in their distinctive immunophenotypical and ultrastructural features.