Recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma: multicentric occurrence or intrahepatic metastasis? A viewpoint in terms of pathology

Recurrence after successful surgical or nonsurgical treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is caused either by intrahepatic metastasis or by metachronously multicentric occurrence. Intrahepatic metastasis is a major cause of recurrence of advanced HCCs with varying degrees of vascular invasion, and multicentric occurrence is a frequent cause of recurrence in small HCCs with no obvious vascular invasion. It is estimated that at least 20% of small HCCs have a high probability of recurrence due to multicentric occurrence, based on the finding that adenomatous hyperplasia (AH) and/or atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (AAH), which are considered premalignant lesions, are found in the vicinity of resected small HCCs with liver cirrhosis. However, because neither AH nor AAH occur in HCC cases without liver cirrhosis, most recurrence of HCC in noncirrhotic liver is considered to be due to intrahepatic metastasis or to de novo hepatocarcinogenesis. In a survey of autopsy cases of liver cirrhosis with small HCC, smaller HCC nodules were found in other liver slices in 50% of cases, and it is estimated that approximately 50% of HCC is already multicentric in the early stage.     

Recurrent patterns and prognosis following resection of hepatocellular carcinoma

This report is based on an analysis of the recurrent patterns and post-treatment clinical outcome of 78 patients following hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Patients with a single recurrent tumor (group A;n=41) often had multicentric carcinogenesis (41.7%) and were treated locally; i.e., by re-resection or by percutaneous ethanol injection therapy (PEIT). Many of them (42.9%) followed the “curative pattern,” with good prognosis (70.3% 5-year survival rate). Although 6 of the patients with two or three recurrent tumors (group B;n=19) had multicentric carcinogenesis that could be treated locally, 13 of the 19 followed the “non-curative pattern,” with a poor prognosis after recurrence (14.8% 3-year survival rate after recurrence). The primary tumors of the patients with multiple or infiltrating type (group C;n=18) were advanced and these patients had metastatic recurrence, thereby following the “early death pattern” (58.8%) with a poor prognosis (30% 5-year survival rate). For group C patients, hepatectomy was regarded as part of a multidisciplinary treatment regimen that included aggressive postoperative chemotherapy as a necessary component.     

Repeat hepatectomy is the most useful treatment for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatic resection has been regarded as a curative treatment for primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but a high incidence of postoperative recurrence is general. Thus it is important to predict the patterns of recurrence and select the appropriate treatment for recurrence for a better long‐term prognosis of patients with HCC. Clinicopathological studies on 80 patients with intrahepatic recurrence after curative hepatectomy suggested that nodular‐type recurrence with up to three nodules is mainly due to metachronous multicentric hepatocarcinogenesis rather than intrahepatic metastases. We reviewed 300 patients with recurrent HCC, and repeat hepatectomy was done in 78 cases (26.0%). The 3‐ and 5‐year survival rates after repeat hepatectomy were 82.8% and 47.5%, respectively, showing better prognosis than those for other treatments. Repeat hepatectomy is the preferred treatment offering a hope of long‐term survival for patients with recurrent HCC as long as liver function is sufficient; thus early detection of recurrence should be ensured.     

HBcrAg is a predictor of post‐treatment recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma during antiviral therapy

Background/Aims: The recurrence rate of hepatitis B virus (HBV)‐related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is high even in patients receiving curative therapy. In this study, we analysed the risk factors for tumour recurrence after curative therapy for HBV‐related HCC while under treatment with nucleot(s)ide analogues (NAs) by measuring serum HBcrAg and intrahepatic covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) levels to elucidate the viral status associated with HCC recurrence. Methods: We enrolled 55 patients who developed HCC during NA therapy and underwent either curative resection or percutaneous ablation for HCC. Results: Hepatocellular carcinoma recurred in 21 (38%) of the patients over a period of 2.2 (range, 0.2–7.4) years. In multivariate analysis, serum HBcrAg levels ≥4.8log U/ml at the time of HCC diagnosis (hazard ratio, 8.96; 95% confidential interval, 1.94–41.4) and portal vein invasion (3.94, 1.25–12.4) were independent factors for HCC recurrence. The recurrence‐free survival rates of the high cccDNA group were significantly lower than those of the low cccDNA group only in patients who underwent resection (P=0.0438). A positive correlation (P=0.028; r=0.479) was observed between the intrahepatic cccDNA and the serum HBcrAg levels at the incidence of HCC. Conclusion: HBcrAg is a predictor of the post‐treatment recurrence of HCC during antiviral therapy. Serum HBcrAg and intrahepatic cccDNA suppression by NAs may be important to prevent HCC recurrence.     

Clinical analysis of the risk factors for recurrence of HCC and its relationship with HBV

AIM: To comprehend the risk factors of recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and its relationship with the infection patterns of hepatitis B virus (HBV).METHODS: All materials of 270 cases of postoperative HCC were statistically analyzed by SPSS software.Recurrence and metastasis were classified into early( ≤2 years) and late phase (>2 years). Risk factors for recurrence and metastasis after surgery in each group were analyzed.RESULTS: Out of 270 cases of HCC, 162 cases were followed up in which recurrence and metastasis occurred in 136 cases. There were a lot of risk factors related to recurrence and metastasis of HCC; risk factors contributing to early phase recurrence were serum AFP level, vascular invasion, incisal margin and operative transfusion, gross tumor classification and number of intrahepatic node to late phase recurrence. The HBV infective rate of recurrent HCC was 94.1%, in which ““HBsAg, HBeAb, HBcAb““ positive pattern reached 45.6%. The proportion of HBV infection in solitary large hepatocellular carcinoma (SLHCC)evidently decreased compared to nodular hepatocellular carcinoma (NHCC) (P<0.05).CONCLUSION: The early and late recurrence and metastasis after hepatectomy of HCC were associated with different risk factors. The early recurrence may be mediated by vascular invasion and remnant lesion, the late recurrence by tumor‘s clinical pathology propert, as multicentric carcinogenesis or intrahepatic carcinoma de novo. HBV replication takes a great role in this process.From this study, we found that SLHCC has more satisfactory neoplasm biological behavior than NHCC.     

Negative hepatitis B envelope antigen predicts intrahepatic recurrence in hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma after ablation therapy

Background and Aim: Patients with persistently active hepatitis B virus (HBV) replication are at high risk for progression to liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The influence of the viral load of HBV on intrahepatic recurrence after local ablation therapy in patients with HBV‐related HCC has not been elucidated. We aimed to evaluate predictors of intrahepatic recurrence and clarify the correlation between viral load and intrahepatic recurrence after percutaneous ablation. Methods: Patients with HBV‐related, solitary HCC undergoing radiofrequency ablation (RFA) or percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI), between October 2004 and December 2008 were prospectively enrolled. Statistical analyses were performed using the Kaplan–Meier method and Cox regression model to identify risk factors for intrahepatic recurrence. Results: A total of 145 patients (male, 81.4%; mean age, 55.3 years) were included. Ninety patients (62.1%) had serum HBV DNA ≥ 2000 IU/mL. The median follow‐up duration was 28.9 months (range, 12.0–57.0) and 63 patients (43.4%) experienced intrahepatic tumor recurrence. Multivariate analysis indicated that seropositivity for hepatitis B envelope antigen (HBeAg) was an independent negative predictor of intrahepatic recurrence (hazard ratio, 0.473; P = 0.026) and late (≥ 1 year) recurrence (HR, 0.288; P = 0.012). The serum alpha fetoprotein (AFP) level also significantly predicted late recurrence (HR, 1.001; P = 0.005). However, neither the ablation method nor serum HBV DNA titers were correlated with intrahepatic recurrence. Conclusions: These findings show that HBeAg‐negativity and serum AFP levels were associated with late intrahepatic recurrence of HCC, implicating HBeAg‐negativity as a risk factor for de novo recurrence after percutaneous ablation in HBV‐related HCC.     

Diffuse intrahepatic recurrence after percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for solitary and small hepatocellular carcinoma

Two patients developed segmental, diffuse intrahepatic recurrence after percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) to treat a primary, solitary, and small (2.5 cm) hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Despite the size of the HCC, levels of the tumor markers (α-fetoprotein, α-fetoprotein-L3%, and des-γ-carboxyprothrombin) were all elevated before RFA, and tumors in both patients were contiguous with a major branch of the portal vein. Tumor biopsies of both patients revealed moderately differentiated HCC but diagnostic imaging showed an area of reduced tumor blood flow, suggesting a poorly differentiated component. Since early detection of post-RFA malignancies by standard ultrasonography and contrast-enhanced computed tomography was difficult, the most sensitive indicator of recurrence in these two patients was the elevated tumor markers. The diffuse intrahepatic recurrence was thought to be caused by increased intratumoral pressure during RFA, resulting in the dissemination of cancer cells through the contiguous portal vein. The clinical course of these tumors indicate that the choice of RFA should be carefully considered when treating specific subtype of HCC that is adjacent to main portal vein branch and involves a possible poorly differentiated component and that surgical resection or combinations of RFA with other treatment modalities such as transcatheter arterial chemoembolization should be considered as alternative treatment strategies.     

Repeated liver resection for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma

Background and Aim: Tumor recurrence after liver resection occurs in the majority of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study was conducted to clarify the safety and effectiveness of repeated liver resection as a curative option for intrahepatic HCC recurrence. Methods: Between July 1990 and January 2009, 483 patients underwent 514 curative hepatic resections for HCC in our institution. Among this collective, 27 patients underwent 31 repeated resections due to recurrent HCC (27 s resections, three third resections and one forth resection). The outcome of these patients was retrospectively reviewed using a prospective database. Results: Perioperative morbidity and mortality was 11% (three of 27) and 0%. Six patients showed multiple liver lesions, 23 underwent minor liver resections (fewer than three segments) and five patients underwent major resections (three or more segments). The majority of the patients showed no signs of chronic liver disease (16 of 27). The median tumor free margin was 1.5 mm (range: 0 to 20 mm). The median tumor diameter was 40 mm (range: 10 to 165 mm). Tumor dedifferentiations at time of tumor recurrence were not observed. The 1‐, 3‐ and 5‐year overall survival rates after second liver resection were 96%, 70% and 42%. Conclusions: Repeated liver resection is a valid and safe curative therapy option for recurrent HCC and results in significant prolongation of survival in comparison to interventional treatment strategies in selected patients. However, due to impaired liver function, multifocal intrahepatic or extrahepatic recurrence repeated resection is only feasible in a minority of patients.     

Treatment of solitary small hepatocellular carcinoma: consideration of hepatic functional reserve and mode of recurrence

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurs frequently after initial treatment. The subsequent prognosis varies with the mode of recurrence. Some patients die of hepatic failure even though the HCC is controlled. We consider the clinical stage (CS), using the modified Child-Pugh classification, to be an important factor influencing the prognosis of these patients. METHODOLOGY: To determine the most effective treatment for HCC, we examined 105 patients with solitary small HCC who were followed-up for more than 1 year after initial treatment. All of them were judged to be cured according to imaging or histological studies. The initial treatments were hepatic resection (n = 43), percutaneous ethanol injection therapy (PEIT, n = 33), and percutaneous microwave coagulation therapy (PMCT, n = 29). The modes of recurrence were divided into intrahepatic metastasis (IM) and multicentric occurrence (MO). RESULTS: Prognosis of MO was superior to that of IM in CS I patients, but there was no difference in prognosis between these modes in CS II. The hepatic resection group had more MO recurrences in CS I patients and more IM recurrences in CS II patients. IM developed frequently after PEIT and PMCT, regardless of the CS. Prognosis with hepatic resection was superior to that of the other treatments in CS I patients, but there was no difference in prognosis among the 3 treatment modalities in CS II patients. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that hepatic resection is the first choice for treating HCC in CS I patients, and that PEIT or PMCT is preferable for CS II patients.     

Results of surgical treatment for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma; comparison of outcome among patients with multicentric carcinogenesis, intrahepatic metastasis, and extrahepatic recurrence

No consensus has been reached on the indications for and effectiveness of surgery for secondary intrahepatic hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and extrahepatic metastasis after macroscopically complete removal of primary HCC. Secondary intrahepatic HCCs, usually regarded as recurrence are classified into those arising as a result of multicentric carcinogenesis or intrahepatic metastases derived from the primary HCC. The present study was designed to evaluate the utility of surgical treatment in relation to the pathogenesis of the secondary HCC: classified as multicentric carcinogenesis (MC), intrahepatic metastasis (IM), and extrahepatic metastasis. Thirty patients underwent extirpation of secondary HCC: 22 patients had secondary HCCs in the remnant liver (MC group;n = 8; IM group,n = 14), 6 patients had extrahepatic metastases, and 2 patients had both intrahepatic and extrahepatic metastases. Survival rates after the re-resection in the 22 patients with the secondary intrahepatic HCCs were 94.7% at 1 year, and 50.2% at 3 years postoperatively, and the 8 patients with extrahepatic metastasis had survival rates of 62.5% at 1 year, 37.5% at 3 years, and at 5 years. The survival rates after re-resection in the MC group were 100% at 1 year and 80.0% at 3 years, whereas those in the IM group were 91.7% at 1 year, and 38.1% at 3 years. Surgery can be indicated not only in patients with localized intrahepatic secondary HCCs but also in those with extrahepatic metastasis. In particular, patients with secondary HCCs arising as a result of multicentric carcinogenesis are expected to have a good prognosis.     

Current systemic treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: A review of the literature

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common form of human cancer worldwide and the third most common cause of cancer-related deaths. The strategies of various treatments for HCC depend on the stage of tumor, the status of patient’s performance and the reserved hepatic function. The Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging system is currently used most for patients with HCC. For example, for patients with BCLC stage 0 (very early stage) and stage A (early stage) HCC, the curable treatment modalities, including resection, transplantation and radiofrequency ablation, are taken into consideration. If the patients are in BCLC stage B (intermediate stage) and stage C (advanced stage) HCC, they may need the palliative transarterial chemoembolization and even the target medication of sorafenib. In addition, symptomatic treatment is always recommended for patients with BCLC stage D (end stage) HCC. In this review, we will attempt to summarize the historical perspective and the current developments of systemic therapies in BCLC stage B and C in HCC.     

Treatment allocation in hepatocellular carcinoma: Assessment of the BCLC algorithm

Background and aims. The Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging system is the algorithm most widely used to manage patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We aimed to investigate the extent to which the BCLC recommendations effectively guide clinical practice and assess the reasons for any deviation from the recommendations.Material and methods. The first-line treatments assigned to patients included in the prospective Bern HCC cohort were analyzed.Results. Among 223 patients included in the cohort, 116 were not treated according to the BCLC algorithm. Eighty percent of the patients in BCLC stage 0 (very early HCC) and 60% of the patients in BCLC stage A (early HCC) received recommended curative treatment. Only 29% of the BCLC stage B patients (intermediate HCC) and 33% of the BCLC stage C patients (advanced HCC) were treated according to the algorithm. Eighty-nine percent of the BCLC stage D patients (terminal HCC) were treated with best supportive care, as recommended. In 98 patients (44%) the performance status was disregarded in the stage assignment.Conclusion. The management of HCC in clinical practice frequently deviates from the BCLC recommendations. Most of the curative therapy options, which have well-defined selection criteria, were allocated according to the recommendations, while the majority of the palliative therapy options were assigned to patients with tumor stages not aligned with the recommendations. The only parameter which is subjective in the algorithm, the performance status, is also the least respected.     

Predictive factors affecting early recurrence after hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma in 5-year survivors

BACKGROUND/AIMS: This study was undertaken to establish a therapeutic strategy for long-term recurrence-free survival in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients treated by hepatectomy by determining the factors that predict intrahepatic recurrence. METHODOLOGY: This study included 72 patients who survived more than 5 years after hepatectomy for HCC. Based on the interval between hepatectomy and intrahepatic recurrence, they were classified into 3 groups: those with early recurrence within 2 years after surgery (n=15), those with recurrence between 2 and 5 years (n=18), and those without recurrence within 5 years (n=39). Twenty-six parameters concerning host-related, tumor-related, treatment-related factors, and postoperative levels of serum transaminases were evaluated. RESULTS: Among host-related and tumor-related factors, serum albumin level, serum levels of transaminases, indocyanine green retention rate at 15 minutes, tumor number, intrahepatic metastasis and TNM stage were determined to be significantly different between the patients with recurrence within 5 years and those without recurrence. Among treatment-related factors, curability was highly associated with recurrence. The period until increase in the levels of transaminases after surgery was significantly shorter in patients with recurrence compared to the patients without recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Curative operation minimizing intrahepatic metastasis and postoperative anti-inflammatory treatment lowering the occurrence of multicentric carcinogenesis are useful therapeutic strategies for achieving long-term recurrence-free survival for HCC patients treated with surgery.     

Patterns of recurrence after initial treatment in patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma

To assess intrahepatic metastasis (IM) and multicentric occurrence (MO) after initial treatment of small hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC) < or = 2 cm in diameter, we performed clinical and pathological studies in 112 patients who underwent percutaneous ethanol injection therapy (PEIT) or hepatic resection for HCC from January 1985 to December 1994. Patients with intrahepatic recurrences were classified into two groups based on the type of recurrence: the IM group (n = 29, 50.9%) and the MO group (n = 28, 49.1%). Overall recurrence rates after initial treatment were 23.7% at 1 year, 64.5% at 3 years, and 76.1% at 5 years. In patients with IM, the majority of intrahepatic recurrences were observed within 3 years of initial treatment and the primary HCC lesions were closely related to the degree of tumor cell differentiation. Alternatively, intrahepatic recurrences occurred throughout the follow-up period in patients with MO, and the evidence of underlying liver disease (anti-HCV [antibody to hepatitis C virus] positive) and elevated serum alfa-fetoprotein (AFP) concentrations were closely associated with intrahepatic recurrence. Prognoses following additional treatment in MO group patients were superior to those in IM group patients. These results suggest that differentiation between IM and MO in patients with HCC is important for understanding the development and biological behavior of the tumor. That is, the early detection of intrahepatic recurrence and the institution of appropriate additional therapy (PEIT or hepatic resection) may prolong survival in patients with MO.(Hepatology 1997 Jan;25(1):87-92)     

Prognosis following non‐surgical second treatment in patients with recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after percutaneous ablation therapy

Objective: The aims of this study were to identify prognostic factors in patients who received a non‐surgical second treatment for the development of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after an initial percutaneous ablation therapy. Methods: We retrospectively studied 147 patients with HCC who had received an initially successful percutaneous ablation therapy. The patients were followed up using computed tomography and/or ultrasound every 3 months and a second treatment was performed for subsequent recurrent tumours. Results: The 3‐ and 5‐year survival rates of the 147 patients were 90 and 65% respectively. During a mean follow‐up period of 33 months, local or distant tumour recurrences developed in 77 of the 147 patients, and the 3‐ and 5‐year survival rates after a second treatment in these 77 patients were 73 and 44% respectively. Forty‐six of the 77 patients with up to three recurrent tumours received percutaneous ablation therapy for the second treatment, and the remaining 31 patients with more than three (multiple) recurrent tumours received transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for their second treatment. A multivariate analysis revealed the serum α‐fetoprotein level at the time of the appearance of the recurrent HCC (<100 ng/ml vs ≥100 ng/ml, P=0.009) and the number of recurrent tumours (up to three vs more than three, P=0.009) to be independent prognostic factors after the second treatment. Conclusions: The serum α‐fetoprotein level and recurrent tumour number were prognostic factors following the second treatment in patients with recurrent HCC who had received an initially successful ablation therapy.     

Clinicopathologic analysis of stage II-III hepatocellular carcinoma showing early massive recurrence after liver resection

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Prognosis after hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has been improved by progress in the evaluation of hepatic functional reserve, surgical techniques and perioperative management. However, even when curative resection is performed at a relatively early stage, a considerable number of patients develop early intrahepatic and/or extrahepatic recurrence postoperatively. This study analyzed the clinicopathologic features of HCC with early recurrence. METHODS: We reviewed records of 513 consecutive patients who had undergone liver resection for HCC. There were 48 deaths within a year after surgery from recurrence, including 21 patients with stage II or III HCC (group I). Clinicopathologic parameters of group I patients were compared with those of 188 patients (group II) who developed recurrence following resection of stage II or III HCC and died more than 1 year after surgery. RESULTS: On univariate analysis, age, tumor diameter (phi), alpha-fetoprotein (AFP):phi and protein induced by vitamin K absence or antagonist II (PIVKA-II):phi were significantly greater in group I than in group II. Macroscopic portal vein invasion, microscopic vascular invasion, intrahepatic metastasis, poor differentiation, pleomorphism, sarcomatous change, vascular lake, and angiographic condensed pooling were more frequently observed in group I than group II. Five independent determinants were selected by multivariate analysis: AFP:phi, histologic pleomorphism, sarcomatous change, vascular lake and angiographic condensed pooling. CONCLUSIONS: Highly malignant HCC with extremely poor prognosis exhibits peculiar clinicopathologic characteristics, particularly histologic immaturity, and can be predicted by preoperative indicators such as markedly elevated tumor marker concentrations and condensed pooling on angiography.     

Transarterial chemoembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma treatment: Barcelona clinic liver cancer staging system

Hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC),the fifth most common cancer that predominantly occurs in liver cirrhosis patients,requires staging systems to design treatments. The barcelona clinic liver cancer staging system(BCLC) is the most commonly used HCC management guideline. For BCLC stage B(intermediate HCC),transarterial chemoembolization(TACE) is the standard treatment. Many studies support the use of TACE in early and advanced HCC patients. For BCLC stage 0(very early HCC),TACE could be an alternative for patients unsuitable for radiofrequency ablation(RFA) or hepatic resection. In patients with BCLC stage A,TACE plus RFA provides better local tumor control than RFA alone. TACE can serve as bridge therapy for patients awaiting liver transplantation. For patients with BCLC B,TACE provides survival benefits compared with supportive care options. However,because of the substantial heterogeneity in the patient population with this stage,a better patient stratification system is needed to select the best candidates for TACE. Sorafenib represents the first line treatment in patients with BCLC C stage HCC. Sorafenib plus TACE has shown a demonstrable effect in delaying tumor progression. Additionally,TACE plus radiotherapy has yielded better survival in patients with HCC and portal venous thrombosis. Considering these observations together,TACE clearly has a critical role in the treatment of HCC as a stand-alone or combination therapy in each stage of HCC. Diverse treatment modalities should be used for patients with HCC and a better patient stratification system should be developed to select the best candidates for TACE.     

Rapid intrahepatic tumor seeding after percutaneous ethanol injection therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma

A 73-year-old man with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) had been treated repeatedly with transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) and percutaneous ethanol injection therapy (PEIT) since 2000. HCC recurrence near the intrahepatic left portal vein was treated by PEIT in 2004. The patient complained of fatigue and upper abdominal pain 28 days later. Abdominocentesis and abdominal computed tomography demonstrated rupture of the recurrent HCC and multiple intrahepatic recurrences. We successfully performed emergency TAE, but the patient died of liver failure. Rapid seeding of multiple intrahepatic tumors after PEIT is a rare event, but such a possibility must be kept in mind.     

Prognostic factors after recurrence of resected hepatocellular carcinoma associated with hepatitis C virus

To clarify the variables related to survival after recurrence of resected hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) associated with hepatitis C virus (HCV), we studied 17 clinicopathological factors in 99 patients with recurrence of HCC associated with HCV infection after hepatic resection. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates after first resection in these patients were 91%, 81%, and 49%, while after recurrence they were 81%, 51%, and 29%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that the following six variables were independent prognostic factors after recurrence: platelet count, albumin level, bilirubin level, number of hepatic lesions, distant metastasis, and any treatment at recurrence. A correlation between second hepatic resection (SHR) and liver function tests was seen in regard to albumin and total bilirubin values at recurrence. Indeed, hepatic function and progression of intrahepatic tumors at recurrence were significant prognostic factors after recurrence of HCC associated with HCV infection, while any treatment at recurrence was also a significant prognostic factor. Therefore, in order to improve prognosis after recurrence, we should actively treat the recurrent hepatic lesions whenever possible.     

Prognostic impact of anatomical resection on early and late intrahepatic recurrence in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

Background/Purpose

Little has been addressed regarding the impact of the type of resection, which can be anatomical or nonanatomical, for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), from the viewpoint of early (≤2-year) and late (>2-year) intrahepatic recurrence. The aim of the present study was to investigate this issue.

Methods

Between 1990 and 2004, we performed 365 potentially curative liver resections. Among these, 233 patients with a solitary tumor were the subjects of this study. They were classified into two groups: anatomical resection (n = 106) and nonanatomical resection (n = 127). We evaluated the following outcomes: (1) early and late recurrence rates; (2) topography of the recurrent tumors; and (3) risk factors for early recurrence.

Results

The early recurrence rate after anatomical resection was significantly lower than that after nonanatomical resection: recurrence rates at 1 and 2 years were 13.8% and 29.8%, respectively, in the former group; while they were 22.6% and 46.3%, respectively, in the latter group (P = 0.01; log-rank test). However, late recurrence rates were similar in the two groups (P = 0.36). Local recurrence was observed in 25 of the 89 patients with intrahepatic recurrence after nonanatomical resection (28%), whereas it was observed in 3 of the 64 patients with intrahepatic recurrence after anatomical resection (5%), showing a significantly lower local recurrence rate in the anatomical resection group (P = 0.0002). Cox multivariate analysis identified the type of resection employed as one of the variables contributing to early HCC recurrence (nonanatomical resection: hazard ratio, 1.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01–3.37).

Conclusions

Anatomical resection would be a more appropriate strategy than nonanatomical resection for preventing early intrahepetic recurrence in patients with solitary HCC. However, the type of resection has no significant influence on late recurrence.