Response to combined interferon and ribavirin is better in patients infected with hepatitis C virus genotype 6 than genotype 1 in Hong Kong

Data on the treatment efficacy of interferon (IFN)-alpha and ribavirin in patients with chronic hepatitis infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) of genotype 6 are lacking. A study has been reported from Hong Kong which compared the treatment efficacy of IFN-alpha and ribavirin in the treatment of chronic HCV infection with genotypes 1 and 6. Twenty-four patients with HCV genotype 1 and 16 patients with HCV genotype 6 were studied. The baseline demographic data including median age, gender ratio, alanine aminotransferase levels, bilirubin levels, HCV RNA levels and histological scores were comparable between the two groups of patients. All patients received IFN-alpha 5 million units three times per week and ribavirin (1,000 mg for those weighing 75 kg) for 1 year. Patients infected with HCV genotype 6 achieved virological response significantly higher than those with HCV genotype 1 (67 vs. 33% at week 24, p = 0.02; 75 vs. 42% at the end of treatment, p = 0.05; 63 vs. 29% at 6 months after completion of treatment, p = 0.04). Histological improvement in inflammatory activity and fibrosis in the liver were observed in 25% and 25% of patients infected with HCV genotype 6 in contrast to only 13 and 8% in patients infected with HCV genotype 1; however, the differences were not statistically significant. In conclusion, patients with HCV genotype 6 gain a better response to combined treatment with IFN-alpha and ribavirin than those with HCV genotype 1 and achieve a significantly higher rate of sustained virological response.     

Two-year interferon therapy with or without ribavirin in chronic delta hepatitis

The only beneficial agent for the treatment of chronic delta hepatitis (CDH) is interferon (IFN). However, there is no consensus on the best dosage or duration of IFN therapy. As ribavirin (RBV) increases the sustained response when added to IFN in chronic hepatitis C, probably because of its immunomodulatory effect, we aimed to investigate the efficacy of 2-year IFN treatment and whether RBV had any additive effect to IFN in CDH. METHODS: Patients (n = 31) with CDH were randomized with a 1:2 ratio as 10 patients (3 females/7 males, age 39 +/- 9) receiving IFN monotherapy (9 MU IFN-alpha2a three times weekly) and 21 patients (8 females/13 males, age 38 +/- 11) receiving IFN plus RBV for 2 years (IFN at the same dosage and RBV at 1000-1200 mg/day). Alanine transferase normalization and hepatitis delta virus (HDV) RNA negativity at the end of treatment and at the end of the follow-up period (at least 6 months following 2-year treatment) were primary endpoints of the study. In addition, virological response and biochemical response were determined separately. RESULTS: Eight of 31 patients (25%) had cirrhosis in liver biopsies. Six patients from the IFN monotherapy group and 12 patients from the combination group had biochemical response. Five patients from the IFN monotherapy group and 11 patients from the combination group had virological response at the end of therapy. Two patients from the IFN group and five patients from the combination group had sustained biochemical response at the end of the follow-up period. Hepatitis B virus (HBV) activations with HBV DNA positivity were observed in two patients (one from the IFN monotherapy group, one from the combination group). Two patients (20%) in the IFN group and five patients (23.5%) in IFN plus RBV group remained as virological responders at the end of the follow-up period (P > 0.05). None of the patients with liver cirrhosis were responsive at the end of the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: Almost 20% of the patients with CDH were responsive to 2-year IFN treatment at the end of the follow-up period and no additional effect of RBV was observed. Patients with advanced liver disease failed to respond to treatment.     

Treatment of chronic hepatitis C in patients with end-stage renal disease and hemophilia--the Singapore experience

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the response to treatment with interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) in patients with chronic hepatitis C who had end-stage renal disease (ESRD) or hemophilia in Singapore. METHODS: Treatment-naive hepatitis patients with ESRD or hemophilia were given IFN-alpha(2a) 3 million units three times per week for 12 months in an open-label study. Hepatitis C virus RNA was determined before treatment, at the end of treatment and 6 months thereafter. Regular clinical examinations including blood counts and biochemistry were carried out during and after the treatment. RESULTS: Nine consecutive patients with ESRD (8 men and 1 woman) and 6 consecutive male patients with hemophilia, with a mean age of 43 and 40 years, received treatment. Patients in both groups were predominantly infected with hepatitis C virus genotype 1 and had significant cytopenia affecting all three cell lines during the treatment; only 1 patient developed serious neutropenia, temporarily demanding a reduction of his IFN dose. Biochemical and virological responses at the end of treatment were accomplished by 8 of the 9 (89%) patients with ESRD and 4 of the 6 (67%) patients with hemophilia; however, 1 patient with ESRD and 2 with hemophilia relapsed after the treatment. Four of the 7 patients with ESRD who had sustained virological response underwent successful kidney transplantation later on. CONCLUSION: Monotherapy with IFN-alpha for 12 months is safe for treatment of the patients with chronic hepatitis C who had ESRD or those with hemophilia. A higher sustained virological response rate was observed in patients with ESRD than in those with hemophilia (78 vs. 33%).     

Response to interferon-based therapies in HIV-infected patients with chronic hepatitis C due to genotype 4

BACKGROUND: The hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype is the main predictor of response to interferon (IFN)-based therapies. HCV genotype 4 is spreading among European intravenous drug users, who are frequently coinfected with HIV. Information about treatment response in this subset of patients is scarce and conflicting results have been reported. METHODS: All HIV-infected patients treated for chronic hepatitis C at our institution with a minimum follow-up of 6 months after discontinuing therapy were retrospectively analysed. They had received one of three HCV treatment modalities: IFN monotherapy, IFN plus ribavirin (RBV) or pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) plus RBV. Treatment responses were stratified according to HCV genotype. RESULTS: A total of 390 patients were analysed. Sustained virological response (SVR) to HCV therapy had been reached by 90 (23.1%): 22/119 (18.5%) with IFN monotherapy; 17/106 (16%) with IFN plus RBV; and 51/165 (30.9%) with PEG-IFN plus RBV. SVR was significantly higher among those with HCV genotypes 2 or 3 (40.4%; 61/151) than in patients with either HCV genotype 1 (11.2%; 22/197) or HCV genotype 4 (16.7%; 7/42) (P<0.0001). In contrast, there were no significant differences in the response rate comparing HCV genotypes 1 and 4 (P=0.53). CONCLUSIONS: Response to IFN-based therapies in HIV-positive patients with hepatitis C due to HCV genotype 4 is poor, similar to that obtained for HCV genotype 1 and much lower than for HCV genotypes 2 and 3. Therefore, HIV-infected patients with hepatitis C due to genotype 4 should be considered as a particular subset of difficult-to-treat patients. New treatment strategies and drugs for these patients are eagerly awaited.     

Treatment of chronic hepatitis C in southern Taiwan

Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection may lead to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Interferon (IFN)-alpha is effective in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C. The rate of response to IFN is enhanced by increasing the IFN dose. Extending the treatment duration can reduce the relapse rate. Addition of ribavirin to IFN increases the sustained virological response (SVR). Thus, combination therapy with IFN and ribavirin was adopted for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C in Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital in 1998. Approximately 60% of patients receiving IFN/ribavirin therapy gained SVR. IFN 6 million units three times per week combined with daily ribavirin for 6 months achieved SVR more frequently than combination therapy with 3 million units. Factors for SVR in these combination regimens were HCV genotype, viral load and early virological response. Long-term follow-up of patients treated with IFN has shown that SVR might reduce the risk of progression to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Pegylated (peg)-IFN has a longer half-life and better efficacy. Combination therapy with peg-IFN and ribavirin accomplished higher SVR than conventional IFN and ribavirin. A multicenter clinical trial was conducted in Taiwan to compare the efficacy of combination therapy between peg-IFN/ribavirin and conventional IFN/ribavirin for 6 months. SVR was higher in patients receiving peg-IFN and ribavirin, especially in those infected with HCV genotype 1b. Based on the results obtained, the national health insurance started to sponsor the combination therapy in October 2003, with a suggested duration for 6 months. Some small-scale studies in Taiwan have postulated higher SVR for treatment duration of 12 than of 6 months in patients with genotype 1b. Further investigation should be conducted in the near future.     

Viral interaction and responses in chronic hepatitis C and B coinfected patients with interferon-alpha plus ribavirin combination therapy

BACKGROUND/AIMS: We conducted a case-control study to investigate the efficacy of interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) and ribavirin combination therapy for patients with chronic hepatitis C and B virus (HCV/HBV) coinfection and to elucidate the interaction of these two viruses. METHODS: Forty-two chronic HCV/HBV-coinfected patients (29 IFN-naive, 13 IFN-relapsed) and 84 HCV-monoinfected controls, matched for age, sex and previous history of IFN-alpha therapy, were enrolled. All patients were treated with IFN-alpha-2b 6 MU three-times weekly plus ribavirin 1000-1200 mg daily for 24 weeks. Serum HCV RNA and HBV DNA were determined every 24 weeks for 72 weeks. RESULTS: The rate of HCV sustained virological response (SVR) was comparable among IFN-naive and IFN-relapsed HCV/HBV-coinfected patients and IFN-naive and IFN-relapsed HCV-monoinfected patients (69.0%, 69.2%, 67.2% and 57.7%, respectively; intention-to-treat analysis). HCV genotype 1b, high pretreatment HCV RNA levels and liver fibrosis were significantly associated with a lower HCV SVR. Of 16 baseline HBV viraemic patients, five (31.3%) achieved HBV SVR, which correlated negatively to HCV genotype non-1b and HCV SVR. Only one (6.3%) had simultaneous seroclearance of HCV and HBV. Antibodies to HBV surface antigen seroconversion developed in five (11.9%) patients during long-term follow-up. HCV responders had significantly higher rates of HBV DNA resurgence than HCV non-responders during and after treatment. Reciprocal viral interference was noted between HCV and HBV after IFN-alpha/ribavirin therapy. CONCLUSIONS: IFN-alpha/ribavirin combination therapy is effective for HCV/HBV-coinfected patients in eradicating HCV infection and might promote HBV seroclearance, and there is a mutual viral response and reciprocal viral interaction between HBV and HCV.     

Retreatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C not responding to interferon/ribavirin combination therapy with daily interferon plus ribavirin plus amantadine

There is currently no accepted therapeutic regimen for patients with chronic hepatitis C who failed to respond to standard combination treatment with interferon-alpha plus ribavirin. We investigated triple combination treatment with induction dosing of interferon-alpha plus ribavirin plus amantadine in these difficult-to-treat patients. Nonresponders (n = 67), breakthroughs (n = 16) and relapsers (n = 19) to previous interferon/ribavirin combination treatment of at least 6 months were included. For the first 16 weeks, patients received interferon-alpha2a 6 MU daily, ribavirin 800-1200 mg/d, and amantadine 200 mg/d. In cases of undetectable HCV RNA at week 12, treatment was continued with interferon-alpha2a 6 MU every other day and the same doses of ribavirin and amantadine until week 48. In cases of HCV RNA positivity at week 12, treatment was stopped. A total of 102 patients were enrolled (80%: genotype 1, 19%: cirrhosis). HCV RNA was negative in 35/102 patients (34%) at week 12 and in 27/ 102 patients (26%) at the end of treatment. Virological response was sustained in 15/102 patients (15%). On-treatment virological response was higher in previous relapsers/breakthroughs than in previous nonresponders (week 12: 49% vs. 27%, p < 0.05; week 48: 46% vs. 16%, p < 0.01) but no such difference was found for sustained virological response (20% vs. 12%, NS). In conclusion, triple combination treatment with daily interferon-alpha plus ribavirin plus amantadine for 3 months can induce virological response in a considerable number of nonresponders/relapsers to previous dual combination treatment, but the sustained virological response rate remains low.     

Combined interferon and ribavirin therapy for chronic hepatitis C in Taiwan

Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, including its sequelae, is an important healthcare problem in Taiwan. The seroprevalence of HCV infection in first-time blood donors in Taiwan is 1.2% and an estimated 2-5% in the general population, with a great geographic variation. Genotype 1b is the most prevalent HCV genotype in Taiwan, with a prevalence rate of 50-70%. An increasing incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is mainly attributed to HCV infection, while the declining role of HBV is observed in Taiwan. The seroprevalence of hepatitis B surface antigen among patients with HCC was 90% three decades ago, while recently, chronic HCV infection accounts for more than 30% of HCC patients in the National Taiwan University Hospital. With the advent of a combined conventional interferon (IFN)-alpha and ribavirin therapy, to which Taiwan has contributed in the early study phase, the sustained virological response rate has been greatly improved compared with IFN monotherapy. The sustained virological response rate in Taiwanese patients treated with the combination therapy for 6 months has reached up to 50-60%, which is higher than that reported in patients from the Western countries receiving a 12-month regimen. It is necessary to search for the underlying mechanisms for the better treatment outcome with IFN plus ribavirin combination therapy in Taiwanese patients. Whether long-term effects of IFN plus ribavirin therapy can reduce the incidence of HCC needs to be established.     

Pegylated interferon-alpha2b plus ribavirin: an efficacious and well-tolerated treatment regimen for patients with hepatitis C virus related histologically proven cirrhosis

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the efficacy, safety and tolerability of pegylated interferon plus ribavirin treatment in patients with chronic hepatitis Cvirus (HCV) infection and histologically proven fully established cirrhosis. We aimed here to evaluate the safety of this regimen in such patients and to identify baseline and on-treatment predictors of a sustained virological response (SVR). METHODS: Patients with histologically proven, HCV-induced cirrhosis were randomized to receive pegylated interferon-alpha2b (PEG-IFN-alpha2b; 1.0 microg/kg/week, n=56; group A) or recombinant interferon-alpha2b (IFN-alpha2b; 3 million IU three times/week, n=36; group B), each in combination with a weight-based dose of ribavirin (800-1,200 mg/day) for up to 48 weeks. The primary endpoint of the study was the assessment of SVR, defined as undetectable HCV RNA 24 weeks after treatment cessation. RESULTS: Overall, 40% (37/93) of patients attained SVR: 44% (25/57) in group A and 33% (12/36) in group B (P=0.31). SVR rates were significantly higher in genotype 2/3 patients than in genotype 1 patients (69% versus 25%; P<0.0001). Platelet count at baseline, rapid virological response, and early virological response were predictors of SVR. Twelve patients discontinued treatment because of an adverse event and 20 patients required ribavirin dose reduction for the management of anaemia. CONCLUSIONS: PEG-IFN-alpha2b plus ribavirin for 48 weeks is an efficacious and well-tolerated treatment regimen for patients with HCV-induced cirrhosis. Although SVR rates were more satisfactory in genotype 2/3 than in genotype 1 patients, our study identified additional predictors of response that could allow physicians to better manage treatment in this 'difficult-to-cure' subset of patients.     

Pegylated interferon Alfa-2b monotherapy and pegylated interferon Alfa-2b plus lamivudine combination therapy for patients with hepatitis B virus E antigen-negative chronic hepatitis B

Forty-eight hepatitis B virus (HBV) E antigen-negative chronic hepatitis B patients received pegylated interferon alfa-2b either alone or with lamivudine for 48 weeks and were followed for an additional 24 weeks. At the end of follow-up, virological response rates (HBV DNA levels of <400 copies/ml) were similar in the monotherapy (24%) and combination therapy (26%) groups.     

A sustained virological response to interferon or interferon/ribavirin reduces hepatocellular carcinoma and improves survival in chronic hepatitis C: a nationwide, multicentre study in Taiwan

BACKGROUND: The long-term benefit for chronic hepatitis C (CHC) patients treated with interferon (IFN)/ribavirin (RBV) combination therapy remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate the long-term effects of IFN monotherapy and IFN/RBV combination therapy on reducing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and mortality in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, adjusting for risk factors. METHODS: A total of 1,619 patients with biopsy-proven CHC, including 1,057 receiving IFN-based therapy (760 on IFN/RBV combination therapy) and 562 untreated controls from three medical centres and one regional core hospital in Taiwan were enrolled in this retrospective-prospective cohort study. RESULTS: The incidence of HCC and survival during a follow-up period of 1.0-15.3 (mean 5.18) and 1-16 (mean 5.15) years in treated and untreated patients, respectively, was analysed using Cox proportional hazards regression. The cumulative incidence of HCC was 35.2% and 12.2% for untreated and treated groups, respectively (P=0.0013). The cumulative survival rate was 93.1% and 96.2% for untreated and treated groups, respectively (P=0.3928). Significantly lower incidences of HCC and mortality were observed in sustained virological responders (both for IFN monotherapy and IFN/RBV combination) but not in nonresponders when compared with untreated patients. HCV genotype 1 patients had significantly higher incidences of HCC than genotype non-1 patients. In multivariate analysis, pre-existing cirrhosis, non-response, HCV genotype-1 and age were associated with HCC; pre-existing cirrhosis and non-response correlated to mortality. CONCLUSION: A sustained virological response secondary to IFN monotherapy or IFN/RBV combination therapy could reduce the risk for HCC and improve survival of CHC patients.     

Long-term follow-up of HIV-infected patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection treated with interferon-based therapies

BACKGROUND: Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is frequent among HIV-infected patients. Clearance of serum HCV RNA 6 months after discontinuing HCV therapy is generally interpreted as a cure of HCV infection in HIV-negative subjects. However, the occurrence of liver complications (including hepatocellular carcinoma) and/or HCV relapses in coinfected patients when followed for long periods of time after HCV therapy is not well known. METHODS: All HIV-infected patients who had been treated for chronic hepatitis C at our institution and had a minimum follow-up of 6 months after discontinuing therapy were retrospectively analysed. They had received one of three HCV treatment modalities: IFN monotherapy, IFN plus ribavirin (RBV) or pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) plus RBV. RESULTS: A total of 351 patients were retrospectively analysed. Sustained virological response (SVR) to HCV therapy had been reached by 77 (22%) of them: 22/119 (18.5%) with IFN monotherapy, 17/106 (16%) with IFN plus RBV and 38/126 (30.2%) with PEG-IFN plus RBV. Considering the HCV genotypes, SVR had been reached by 19/184 (10.3%) of patients with genotype 1, 54/138 (39.1%) with genotypes 2 or 3, and 4/29 (13.8%) of those with genotype 4. Within a total of 4466 patient-months follow-up (mean of 58 months), none of the 77 patients with SVR showed HCV-RNA rebounds, elevations in liver enzymes potentially linked to HCV, development of hepatocellular carcinoma or episodes of decompensated cirrhosis. In contrast, all 274 patients who did not reach SVR with HCV therapy showed evidence of persistent serum HCV RNA and 90% of them showed liver enzyme elevations during a total of 15344 patient-months follow-up (mean of 56 months). Moreover, 11 (4%) developed clinical complications of liver cirrhosis and two of them died of end-stage liver disease. CONCLUSIONS: HCV replication and HCV-related liver disease seem to be permanently halted in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients showing HCV-RNA clearance 6 months after completing any kind of IFN-based therapy. In contrast, complications of liver disease due to persistent HCV infection continue to occur in non-responders. The role of maintenance HCV therapy should be explored in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients.     

Interferon-beta plus ribavirin therapy can be safely and effectively administered to elderly patients with chronic hepatitis C

AimThis study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of interferon-beta plus ribavirin therapy in older Japanese patients.Patients and methodsThis study enrolled 132 older patients (age, ≥65 years) with chronic hepatitis C who received 24–48 weeks of interferon-beta plus ribavirin (FR; n = 66) or pegylated interferon-alpha plus ribavirin (PR; n = 66) therapy.ResultsPatients with the ITPA genotype (CA/AA) in the PR group had significantly greater decreases in hemoglobin levels than those in the FR group at or after week 8. The proportions of patients with a dose reduction of interferon-beta and ribavirin in the FR group were significantly lower than those in the PR group. A significantly higher proportion of patients completed treatment in the FR group than in the PR group. The sustained virological response (intention-to-treat analysis) rate of naïve patients with genotype 1 was 29% (6 of 21) in the PR group and 29% (6 of 21) in the FR group. The sustained virological response (intention-to-treat) rate of those with genotype 2 was 67% (12 of 18) in the PR group and 72% (13 of 18) in the FR group.ConclusionInterferon-beta plus ribavirin therapy was safe in elderly patients, with lower proportions of patients with a dose reduction of interferon-beta or ribavirin and treatment discontinuation. In treatment-naïve patients, the sustained virological response rate was similar between interferon-beta plus ribavirin therapy and pegylated interferon-alpha plus ribavirin therapy, regardless of whether the patients had hepatitis C virus genotype 1 or 2.     

Effect of alpha interferon (IFN-alpha) on 2'-5' oligoadenylate synthetase activity in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of patients with chronic hepatitis C: relationship to the antiviral effect of IFN-alpha.

Alpha interferon (IFN-alpha) is, to date, the only treatment with proven efficacy in patients with chronic hepatitis C. However, less than 15% of the patients have a sustained response to IFN-alpha. Interferon acts through the induction of various cellular enzymes. Among them, the 2'-5' oligoadenylate synthetase (2-5OAS) is (at least in part) responsible for a direct antiviral effect of IFN-alpha. The aim of this study was to determine whether basal and IFN-alpha-induced in vivo and in vitro 2-5OAS activities measured in peripheral blood mononuclear cells predict biochemical and virological responses to IFN-alpha in patients with chronic hepatitis C. 2-5OAS activity in peripheral blood mononuclear cells and the antiviral effect of IFN-alpha were studied in 36 patients with chronic hepatitis C (27 men and 9 women; mean age, 44.7 years). Basal in vivo 2-5OAS activity (mean +/- standard error of the mean) was 4.41 +/- 0.69 nmol/10(6) cells. It was significantly induced at month 3 of IFN-alpha therapy (18.07 +/- 2.74 nmol/10(6) cells; P = 0.0001). No significant differences were found in basal in vivo 2-5OAS activities, in IFN-alpha-induced/basal in vitro 2-5OAS activity ratios, in IFN-alpha-induced in vivo 2-5OAS activities, and in IFN-alpha-induced/basal in vivo 2-5OAS activity ratios between the patients with and without a biochemical response (normal alanine aminotransferase activity in serum) or a virological response (normal alanine aminotransferase activity in serum and negative hepatitis C virus RNA detection) at any step of the study. At month 3 of therapy, p69, which is considered to be the active isoform of 2-5OAS, was induced, as demonstrated by Western blot (immunoblot) analysis in 50% of the patients, and induction of the p100 isoform was observed in 70% of the patients. No significant relationship with the response to IFN-alpha therapy was observed. Our results suggest that a deficiency of the IFN-alpha-dependent 2-5OAS system, which could be genetically determined, is unlikely to be responsible for the failure to achieve biochemical and virological responses to IFN-alpha therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C.     

Early and accurate prediction of Peg-IFNs/ribavirin therapy outcome in the individual patient with chronic hepatitis C by modeling the dynamics of the infected cells

A novel biomathematical model that analyzes the combined alanine transaminase (ALT) and viral-load kinetics during the first month of pegylated interferon (Peg-IFN) plus ribavirin (RBV) therapy was successfully applied in 90 of 97 (93%) chronic hepatitis C patients in order to compute the number of infected cells at the end of therapy (I(eot)). The I(eot) indices were lower in sustained virological responders than in relapsers (RELs) and nonresponders (NRs) (median values: 31 vs. 2,190 vs. 1,090,000; P < 0.001), and were independently associated with treatment outcomes (P = 0.003). A threshold of 250 I(eot) was shown to identify sustained virological response (SVR) with high positive predictive value (93%) and good diagnostic accuracy (81%). The time taken to attain 250 I(eot) ranged from 3 to 11 months in patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotypes 2 or 3 and from 3 to 18 months in those with HCV genotypes 1 or 4. Overall, the duration of therapy would have been 49 months less than that suggested by the most recent algorithms based on a rapid virological response (RVR) at week 4.     

Perihepatic lymphadenopathy and the response to therapy in chronic hepatitis C patients

Introduction

To determine whether ultrasound (US) findings of perihepatic lymphadenopathy in patients with chronic hepatitis C (HCV) are predictive of failure to achieve sustained virological responses (SVR) to treatment with pegylated interferon (PEG-INF) alpha and ribavirin.

Materials and methods

The study population included 89 patients with HCV treated with PEG-INF and ribavirin in 2003–2007. US scans and liver biopsies were performed at baseline; US was repeated during treatment and 6 months after its completion. Patients with SVRs at the 6-month follow-up were classified as responders; all others (those with no response or shorter responses) were considered nonresponders.

Results

Baseline US revealed perihepatic lymphadenopathy in 21.3% of the patients, and 31.6% of these patients were responders. In the responder subgroup, 16% of the patients experienced reductions in lymph node volume during treatment, whereas in the nonresponders, lymph node volume increased during treatment. In patients with no lymphadenopathy at baseline US, no lymph nodes were observed at US after the end of treatment, in either the responders or nonresponders.

Conclusions

US is becoming increasingly important in the follow-up of chronic HCV patients. In our study, patients with hilar lymphadenopathy were usually nonresponders, and at the end of treatment their lymph node volume was significantly greater than that observed in the responder subgroup.     

Current antiviral combination therapy for chronic hepatitis C patients who failed to interferon alfa-based treatment

What is known and Objective: Interferon‐alfa‐based therapy is effective in the treatment of Hepatitis C. However, some patients fail to respond and others relapse, after initially responding. Our objective was to assess the efficacy, safety and predictive factors for sustained virological response (SVR) to peginterferon plus ribavirin in chronic hepatitis C patients who failed to interferon‐alfa (IFNα)‐based therapy. Methods: Seventy‐five consecutive patients who failed to IFNα‐based therapy were retreated with peginterferon plus ribavirin. Of these patients, 85% were infected by genotype 1. The primary endpoint was SVR. Results and Discussion: Of 75 non‐responder (n = 54) or relapser patients (n = 21), 50 were previously treated with IFNα‐monotherapy and 25 with IFNα plus ribavirin. Global SVR rate was 41·3%: for patients re‐treated with IFNα the response was 48% whilst for those retreated with IFNα plus ribavirin, it was 28%. For previous non‐responders the SVR rate was 37% and for relapsers it was 52·4%. What is new and Conclusion: Retreatment with peginterferon plus ribavirin is an effective option for some chronic hepatitis C non‐responder or relapser patients. Higher SVR rate was achieved in relapsers and in those patients who received IFNα monotherapy previously.     

The prevalence, clinical features and response to antiviral therapy of patients with chronic hepatitis C who are seropositive for liver-kidney microsome type 1 antibodies

BACKGROUND: Antibodies to liver-kidney microsome type 1 (anti-LKM-1), which are a marker of autoimmune hepatitis, are found in a minority of patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Whether interferon/ribavirin therapy is safe and effective in these patients is unclear. AIM: To describe the prevalence, clinical features and response to interferon/ribavirin therapy of anti-LKM-1 seropositive patients with chronic hepatitis C. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All anti-LKM-1 seropositive patients with chronic hepatitis C who between 1997 and 2002 underwent a diagnostic liver biopsy at the Liver Center Maggiore Hospital, Milan, were studied. Serum HCV RNA was tested by in-house PCR with a limit sensitivity of 50 IU/ml. Tissue antibodies were assessed by indirect immunofluorescence on cryostat sections from rat liver, kidney and stomach. Liver biopsies were graded and staged by the Ishak score. Autoimmune hepatitis was defined according to the International Autoimmune Hepatitis Grading (IAHG) score. RESULTS: Forty-eight (1.8%) of 2675 HCV patients circulated anti-LKM-1 (30 females, 55 years of age). Twenty-eight had genotype 2, 18 genotype 1, and two genotype 3. Aminotransferase levels had been high for 23 + 12 years, on average. Using IAHG, autoimmune hepatitis was excluded in 44 patients (92%) and found to be probable in 4 patients (8%). Chronic hepatitis was histologically mild in 34 patients (70%), moderate to severe in 7 patients (15%) and with cirrhosis in 7 patients (15%). A sustained virological response (SVR) was achieved in 20 of the 27 patients who received interferon/ribavirin (13 genotype 2c with 87% SVR, and 7 genotype 1b with 58% SVR). None of the patients had serum aminotransferases, immunoglobulins or anti-LKM-1 levels flaring following therapy. CONCLUSIONS: LKM-1 antibodies rarely occur in patients with chronic hepatitis C and do not predict autoimmune hepatitis, interferon/ribavirin hyporesponsiveness or immune-related reactions to therapy.     

Retreatment of patients who do not respond to initial therapy for chronic hepatitis C

Despite improvements in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, nearly half of all patients do not respond to initial therapy. Retreatment of these patients with pegylated interferon and ribavirin has been successful in only a limited percentage of cases. Factors associated with sustained virologic response (SVR) following retreatment include prior treatment with interferon monotherapy, HCV genotype 2 or 3, a low serum HCV RNA level, and the absence of cirrhosis. Fewer than 6% of nonresponders who were previously treated with interferon and ribavirin and who have cirrhosis, genotype 1, and a high viral load achieve SVR following retreatment with pegylated interferon and ribavirin. No therapy has been shown to yield SVR in patients who do not respond to pegylated interferon and ribavirin. Long-term maintenance therapy with pegylated interferon is currently being evaluated in nonresponders with advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis. Its use should be considered investigational at this time.     

Hepatitis C

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a leading cause of chronic hepatitis, liver cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma worldwide. Here, we briefly review the virology, diagnosis and therapy of hepatitis C. Standard therapy with pegylated interferon-alpha and ribavirin results in a sustained virological response in 40-50% of genotype 1- and in about 80% of genotype 2- or 3-infected patients. Recent progress has allowed the identification of novel antiviral targets and therapeutic strategies. These will likely complement existing therapeutic modalities in the near future.