Current management strategies for the prevention and treatment of cytomegalovirus infection in pediatric transplant recipients

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality following transplantation, especially in the pediatric population, who remain at high risk of primary infection. The availability of effective antiviral therapy has led to dramatic improvements in the outcome of CMV infection in patients undergoing transplantation. In recent years, three major strategies have been developed for the prevention of CMV disease in this population: reduction of risk of viral acquisition or reactivation by management of risk factors; prophylaxis of all 'at-risk' patients using prophylactic strategies for a defined period of time, initiated at or near the time of transplant; and pre-emptive treatment with ganciclovir of selected 'at-risk' patients, guided by either laboratory markers indicative of subclinical infection or the presence of specific risk factors. In general, well designed comparative studies of one or more antiviral agents for the prevention of CMV have not been carried out. While ganciclovir appears to be more effective than aciclovir, its tolerability profile is less optimal. The use of foscarnet avoids myelosuppresions, but is associated with significant nephrotoxicity. Its use should be reserved for patients unable to tolerate ganciclovir or with ganciclovir-resistant CMV disease. Similar to foscarnet, the high frequency of nephrotoxicity associated with the use of cidofovir limits its use to clinical scenarios suggestive of ganciclovir resistance. Newer options, such as valaciclovir and valganciclovir, are currently under investigation and preliminary experience has been promising. Finally, passive immunoprophylaxis has been shown to prevent CMV disease after solid organ transplantation, but its use in bone marrow transplantation is controversial. Essentially, pre-emptive strategies have relied on the quantitation in the peripheral blood of CMV phosphoprotein pp65 antigen and/or the polymerase chain reaction assay. Strict guidelines for the use of those assays as a guide to pre-emptive therapy have not been standardized. Prospective trials comparing pre-emptive therapy using either intravenous or oral ganciclovir, and now oral valganciclovir or valaciclovir, are necessary to determine the relative cost effectiveness and efficacy of these alternative strategies. Finally, it remains controversial as to whether prophylaxis or pre-emptive therapy is the optimal strategy for preventing CMV disease. While a growing body of literature describes these approaches in adult transplant recipients, published experience in children has been much more limited.     

Cost-effectiveness model of cytomegalovirus management strategies in renal transplantation. Comparing valaciclovir prophylaxis with current practice

BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease may occur following renal transplantation and has been shown to have health and cost consequences in this setting. OBJECTIVE: To compare the cost effectiveness of different CMV management strategies for renal transplant patients: prophylaxis with (i) oral valaciclovir or (ii) intravenous ganciclovir; viral testing for CMV followed by (iii) pre-emptive therapy with intravenous ganciclovir or (iv) adjustment of immunosuppression and intensive monitoring; or (v) waiting to treat when CMV disease develops. METHODS: A decision-tree model was constructed that included the different management strategies for the donor seropositive/recipient seronegative (D+R-) population. Clinical outcomes for the D+R- population came from clinical trials. Treatment algorithms and costs for CMV syndrome and tissue invasive disease were developed from published literature and UK physician interviews. One- and 2-way sensitivity analyses were performed. STUDY PERSPECTIVE: UK National Health Service. RESULTS: Prophylaxis with either oral valaciclovir or intravenous ganciclovir dominated (lower costs and fewer cases of CMV disease) the pre-emptive treatment and wait-and-treat strategies. The cost per patient was from 157 Pounds to 438 Pounds higher with oral valaciclovir prophylaxis compared with intravenous ganciclovir prophylaxis and the incremental cost per case of CMV disease avoided with valaciclovir prophylaxis ranged from 2243 Pounds to 8111 Pounds (1996 values). These results are sensitive to the efficacy of intravenous ganciclovir prophylaxis and CMV management costs. CONCLUSIONS: For D+R- renal transplant patients, prophylaxis is the dominant (more effective and less costly) management strategy compared with pre-emptive and wait-and-treat strategies. The cost per patient with oral valaciclovir prophylaxis compared with intravenous ganciclovir prophylaxis is slightly higher in our base case scenario, but may be lower under reasonable alternative assumptions.     

Valganciclovir: a review of its use in the management of CMV infection and disease in immunocompromised patients

Valganciclovir (Valcyte) is an orally administered prodrug of the standard anti-cytomegalovirus (CMV) drug ganciclovir. Valganciclovir is as effective as intravenous ganciclovir for the treatment of AIDS-related CMV retinitis, and oral ganciclovir for the prophylaxis of CMV infection and disease in high-risk solid organ transplant recipients. The drug is generally well tolerated and has a similar tolerability profile to that of oral or intravenous ganciclovir, but is devoid of adverse events related to intravenous or indwelling catheter access associated with the use of intravenous ganciclovir, cidofovir and foscarnet. The simple and convenient once-daily valganciclovir regimen offers potential for improved patient compliance. It provides greater systemic ganciclovir exposure than oral ganciclovir, thus reducing the risk of viral resistance when used for prophylaxis in high-risk solid organ transplant recipients. Furthermore, the use of valganciclovir instead of intravenous ganciclovir may provide significant cost savings, based on data comparing oral versus intravenous regimens for the treatment of AIDS-related CMV retinitis. Overall, valganciclovir appears to have some advantages over ganciclovir. Therefore, when used as prophylaxis against CMV infection and disease in high-risk solid organ transplant recipients or as induction and maintenance therapy of CMV retinitis in patients with AIDS, oral valganciclovir is an attractive alternative to other available anti-CMV drugs.     

Cytomegalovirus infection in solid organ transplantation: economic implications

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a pathogen, commonly encountered in the recipients of solid organ transplantation and is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in these patients. CMV infection and disease have been shown to increase the cost of care in transplant recipients and several different strategies of prevention have been shown to be effective in clinical trials. A systematic review of published information on the economic impact of CMV in solid organ transplantation was performed; both clinical- and decision-analysis-based studies were reviewed. Clinical studies have shown that CMV infection and disease is associated with increased length of hospital stay and overall costs. Decision-analysis-based studies suggest that in general, antiviral chemoprophylaxis against CMV in transplant recipients is a cost-effective intervention compared with other established healthcare interventions such as strategies for colorectal cancer screening. Prophylaxis with oral or parenteral ganciclovir is probably the most cost-effective strategy; however, restricting prophylaxis to high-risk groups (such as donor seropositive/recipient seronegative status and the use of an antilymphocyte antibody) or chemoprophylaxis for an extended period does not improve cost effectiveness. Pre-emptive therapy is an evolving strategy for prevention of CMV disease in transplant recipients and is rapidly gaining in popularity. Well-designed trials incorporating prospective cost data and comparing pre-emptive therapy versus conventional antiviral prophylaxis are needed to establish the superiority of one strategy over the other.     

Prophylaxis of herpesvirus infections in immunocompetent and immunocompromised older patients

In older patients, prophylaxis of herpesvirus infections mainly involves preventing the recurrence of herpes simplex virus (HSV) and complications of herpes zoster in immunocompetent patients, while in immunocompromised patients it is more concerned with the prevention of opportunistic virus reactivation. HSV ocular infection is the most frequent cause of corneal blindness in the US. The effectiveness of aciclovir 400mg twice daily in preventing the recurrence of HSV eye disease in immunocompetent patients has been well demonstrated. The issue of treatment duration for patients with highly recurrent ocular herpes remains unresolved. Post-herpetic neuralgia (PHN) is one of the most common neuralgic illnesses worldwide. Some progress in prevention of PHN has been made with a combination of antiviral therapy (famciclovir or valaciclovir), started within 72 hours of onset of the rash, and analgesic treatment. However, the best prevention of PHN is the prevention of herpes zoster disease, and the varicella vaccine is an option which over the next few years will be tested in clinical trials. For immunocompromised patients of any age, restoring immunity prevents herpesvirus disease, as demonstrated for cytomegalovirus (CMV) in AIDS patients receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy. Specific antiviral therapy during the initial period after transplantation could prevent reactivation of HSV or CMV in seropositive recipients. Whether pre-emptive therapy or prophylaxis with ganciclovir is the optimal approach against CMV remains controversial, and the relative merits and limitations of each approach may guide the choice. In stem cell transplantation, pre-emptive therapy with foscarnet avoids the neutropenia and related complications associated with ganciclovir. In renal transplant recipients, universal prophylaxis of CMV infection with valaciclovir has the same efficacy as ganciclovir. Although it is relatively toxic, cidofovir should be further evaluated because of its in vitro activity against most DNA viruses.     

Ganciclovir in solid organ transplant recipients: is there a role for clinical pharmacokinetic monitoring?

The authors use a previously published decision-making algorithm to address the role of clinical pharmacokinetic monitoring of ganciclovir, the drug of choice for prophylaxis and treatment of cytomegalovirus (CMV) in solid organ transplant recipients. Ganciclovir pharmacokinetics have been studied in solid organ transplant recipients with a wide range of peak and trough concentrations reported. Numerous assays are available to measure plasma concentrations of ganciclovir, but no clear correlation has been established between peak or trough concentrations and either efficacy or toxicity of the drug. For patients receiving treatment, the pharmacological response of ganciclovir is assessed initially by clinical response. Monitoring prophylactic therapy in asymptomatic patients poses a greater challenge. Although monitoring of antigenemia or polymerase chain reaction (PCR) deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) is not yet part of routine clinical practice, studies have shown a role for these techniques in monitoring response to antiviral therapy. Studies of subpopulations of renal failure patients show a prolonged ganciclovir half-life that requires dosage adjustments. However, ganciclovir clearance is closely correlated with creatinine clearance, which is an appropriate approach to adjusting dosages. Studies in pediatric patients also demonstrate a close correlation between dose per kilogram and AUC, suggesting that monitoring of ganciclovir levels may not be necessary. Based on the evidence presented in this review, routine clinical pharmacokinetic monitoring of ganciclovir does not appear to be warranted in solid organ transplant recipients.     

Prophylaxis against herpesvirus infections in transplant recipients

Herpesvirus infections are important after stem cell and organ transplant. During the last decades several antiviral agents have been introduced with efficacy against herpesviruses. These agents are the nucleoside analogues aciclovir, valaciclovir, famciclovir, and ganciclovir; the nucleotide analogue cidofovir; and the pyrophosphate analogue foscarnet. Several studies have been performed with antiviral agents with the aim to reduce morbidity and mortality associated with herpesvirus infections in transplant recipients. Aciclovir and valaciclovir have been examined in randomised, controlled trials in both solid organ and stem cell transplant patients, and were shown to be very effective for the prevention of herpes simplex virus (HSV) and varicella-zoster virus infections. In addition, these drugs were shown to reduce cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and improve survival in allogenic stem cell transplant patients and to reduce CMV infection, CMV disease (aciclovir and valaciclovir), and acute rejection (valaciclovir) in renal transplant patients. Ganciclovir is very effective for the prevention of CMV infection and disease in both stem cell and solid organ transplant recipients. It can also be used in preemptive strategies in which the aim is to prevent CMV disease in patients who have ongoing CMV infection documented by antigenaemia or detection of CMV DNA. The latter strategy has the advantage of reducing the exposure to the drug and thereby the risk for toxicity. Foscarnet has also been shown to be effective as preemptive therapy for CMV in allogenic stem cell transplant patients and as therapy for aciclovir-resistant HSV infections. Finally cidofovir is an interesting agent with broad spectrum antiherpesvirus efficacy. However, because of the drug's toxicity profile, further studies are needed.     

Strategies for the treatment and prevention of cytomegalovirus infections

Currently, only two drugs, i.e. ganciclovir, (DHPG, cytovene(R))_and foscarent (PFA, Foscavir(R)), are licenced for the treatment of severe CMV infections. Both compounds may have serious side effects and can lead to the emergence of drug-resistant virus strains. Recent pertain to the efficacy of prophylactic or pre-emptive therapy with ganciclovir to prevent the development of CMV infections in transplant recipients. The search for safe and effective anti-CMV chemotherapeutics recently led to the development of some new promising anti-CMV compounds (HPMPC, cyclobutylguanine, benzimidazoles), of which HPMPC is currently undergoing clinical evaluation. Intravenous hyperimmune and normal gamma-globulin have been used prophylactically or therapeutically in the treatment of CMV disease. Some of the trials indicate that immunoglobulin prophylaxis might reduce the incidence or severity of CMV infections in transplant recipients. Some studies also claim prophylactic efficacy for acyclovir, whereas other conclude that acyclovir has little, if any, prophylactica activity in the prevention of CMV infections. The use of live attenuated or subunit CMV vaccines for the prevention of primary CMV infections in solid organ transplant recipients and preggnant women deserves further consideration. Another promising, recently reported, approach is the adoptive transfer of CMV-specific cytotoxic T-cells to the immuno suppressed host with the goal of conferring an adapted immune response.     

Antiviral drugs for cytomegalovirus diseases

Cytomegalovirus infections are associated with severe morbidity and mortality is patients at risk for disease because of immune system disabilities; in particular, recipients of stem cell (HSCT) or solid organ (SOT) transplants. There are three systemic drugs approved for CMV treatment: ganciclovir, or its prodrug valganciclovir, foscarnet, and cidofovir. An anti-sense therapeutic, ISIS 2922, is also approved specifically as in intravitreal treatment for CMV retinitis. Ganciclovir, and more recently, valganciclovir, have been useful in proactive approaches of CMV disease management; in both prophylactic and preemptive regimens in HSCT and SOT populations. The major anti-herpes agent valacyclovir has also been approved for prophylaxis of renal transplant recipients, or SOTs outside of the US. These drugs have provided major advances in CMV disease management, although they are limited by intolerable toxicities, oral bioavailability and efficacy, and risk of drug resistance with extended use. Several drugs are in early clinical development which may address these limitations; this review will provide an overview of our current arsenal of available drugs, and of those in the early clinical development pipeline.     

Viral prophylaxis in organ transplant patients

Viral pathogens have emerged as the most important microbial agents having deleterious effects on solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. Antiviral chemoprophylaxis involves the administration of medications to abort transmission of, avoid reactivation of, or prevent progression to disease from, active viral infection. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is the major microbial pathogen having a negative effect on SOT recipients. CMV causes infectious disease syndromes, augments iatrogenic immunosuppression and is commonly associated with opportunistic superinfection. CMV has also been implicated in the pathogenesis of rejection. Chemoprophylactic regimens for CMV have included oral aciclovir (acyclovir) at medium and high doses, intravenous and oral ganciclovir, and the prodrugs valaciclovir (valacyclovir) and valganciclovir. CMV prophylactic strategies should be stratified, with the highest-risk patients receiving the most 'potent' prophylactic regimens. Herpes simplex virus (HSV) reactivation in SOT recipients is more frequent, may become more invasive, takes longer to heal, and has greater potential for dissemination to visceral organs than it does in the immunocompetent host. Prophylactic regimens for CMV are also effective chemoprophylaxis against HSV; in the absence of CMV prophylaxis, aciclovir, valaciclovir or famciclovir should be used as HSV prophylaxis in seropositive recipients. Primary varicella-zoster virus (VZV) after SOT is rare and most commonly seen in the paediatric transplant population because of VZV epidemiology. Zoster occurs in 5-15% of patients, usually after the sixth post-transplant month. Prophylactic regimens for zoster are neither practical nor cost effective after SOT because of the late onset of disease and low proportion of affected individuals. All SOT recipients should receive VZV immune globulin after contact with either varicella or zoster. Epstein-Barr virus has its most significant effect in SOT as the precipitating factor in the development of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders. Antiviral agents that could be effective are the same as those used for CMV, but indications for and effectiveness of prophylaxis are poorly established. Hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) are important pathogens in the SOT population as indications for transplantation. So-called 'prophylaxis' for recurrent HBV and HCV after liver transplantation is controversial, suppressive rather than preventive, and potentially lifelong. Influenza infection after SOT is acquired by person-to-person contact. During epidemic periods of influenza, transplant populations experience a relatively high frequency of infection, and influenza may affect immunosuppressed SOT recipients more adversely than immunocompetent individuals. Antiviral medications for prevention of influenza are administered as post-exposure prophylaxis to SOT recipients, in addition to yearly vaccine, in circumstances such as influenza epidemics and nosocomial outbreaks, and after exposure to a symptomatic individual during 'flu season'.     

Valaciclovir: a review of its long term utility in the management of genital herpes simplex virus and cytomegalovirus infections

Valaciclovir is an aciclovir prodrug used to treat infections caused by herpes simplex virus (HSV) and varicella zoster virus, and for prophylaxis against cytomegalovirus (CMV). Oral valaciclovir provides significantly better oral bioavailability than oral aciclovir itself, contributing to the need for less frequent administration. Several studies have demonstrated the efficacy of long term (> 90 days) therapy with valaciclovir for the suppression of genital HSV disease in otherwise healthy individuals with HSV infection. In 1 randomised, double-blind trial, once daily valaciclovir (1000 mg, 500 mg and 250 mg) produced statistically significant suppression of disease recurrence, as did twice daily valaciclovir 250 mg and aciclovir 400 mg. Valaciclovir dosages of > or = 500 mg daily are recommended for suppression of genital herpes recurrences in immunocompetent individuals. This disease occurs frequently in patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection and, in a single randomised double-blind trial, prophylactic valaciclovir (1000 mg once daily or 500 mg twice daily) and aciclovir (400 mg twice daily) were found to be of similar efficacy in the suppression of genital herpes. However, a higher than expected dropout rate indicated that more studies of valaciclovir in patients with HIV are required. In a randomised trial of patients undergoing renal transplant, valaciclovir 2 g 4 times daily for 90 days significantly reduced the incidence and delayed the onset of CMV disease: the incidence in valaciclovir-treated patients who were CMV-seronegative at baseline, and recieived a kidney from a CMV-seropositive donor, was 3% versus 45% for placebo after 90 days of treatment. Acute graft rejection was also reduced in the valaciclovir-treated group. A small study in heart transplant patients compared valaciclovir (2 g 4 times daily) with aciclovir (200 mg 4 times daily) and found a significant reduction in CMV antigenaemia favouring valacilovir at the end of the treatment period. Additional reductions in other indices of CMV in those given valaciclovir compared with aciclovir were also noted. In a preliminary study of prophylaxis for CMV disease in bone marrow transplant recipients valaciclovir (2 g 4 times daily) was superior to aciclovir (800 mg 4 times daily) in terms of time to CMV viraemia or viruria. Although valaciclovir (8 g/day for approximately 30 weeks) reduced the incidence and time to CMV disease compared with aciclovir (3.2 g/day) in patients with advanced HIV disease, valaciclovir was associated with more gastrointestinal complaints and an increased risk of death, leading to premature termination of the study. As yet, no trials comparing the efficacy of valaciclovir with famciclovir (the oral prodrug for penciclovir) in the suppression of recurrent episodes of genital herpes have been published, nor have direct comparisons been made, between valaciclovir with ganciclovir in patients with CMV disease. Valaciclovir is well tolerated at dosages used to suppress recurrent episodes of genital herpes (500 to 1000 mg/day) in immunocompetent and HIV seropositive individuals, with headache being reported most often. However, a potentially fatal thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA)-like syndrome has been reported in some immunocompromised patients receiving high-dose prophylactic valaciclovir therapy (8 g/day) for CMV disease for prolonged periods, and the risk of this syndrome appears to be higher in patients with advanced HIV disease. While the clinical benefits of valaciclovir in some immunocompromised patients may outweigh the risk of TMA, close monitoring for symptoms of TMA is indicated in all immunocompromised patients receiving high-dose valaciclovir. Conclusion: Oral valaciclovir is an effective drug for the suppression of recurrent episodes of genital herpes in immunocompetent and immunocompromised individuals. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)     

Oral valganciclovir: a new option for treatment of cytomegalovirus infection and disease in immunocompromised hosts

Immunocompromised hosts are at increased risk of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and serious CMV disease. CMV infection is an important cause of morbidity among patients infected with HIV and after solid organ transplantation (SOT) and may cause life-threatening disease in allogeneic stem cell transplant (SCT) recipients. The introduction into clinical use of potent antiviral compounds and of rapid detection assays for CMV during the past two decades has allowed development of strategies for the prevention and treatment of disease caused by CMV in these groups of immunocompromised patients. At present, the antiviral drugs ganciclovir, foscarnet and cidofovir are commonly used in the treatment of CMV infection and disease. However, these agents have a poor oral bioavailability and, for systemic use, require iv. administration for most indications. Valganciclovir is an oral prodrug of ganciclovir, with a 10-fold greater bioavailability than oral ganciclovir. Studies of the pharmacokinetics of valganciclovir among HIV-infected CMV-seropositive patients and liver transplant recipients suggest that this oral compound has the potential to replace both oral and iv. ganciclovir in many situations if it is shown to be as efficacious and safe as those ganciclovir formulations in immunodeficient patients. In the first part of this review, currently established approaches to the management of CMV infection and disease in SCT and SOT recipients and HIV-infected patients are discussed to highlight possible indications for future valganciclovir use; in the second part, data from human studies of valganciclovir are presented.     

Pharmacokinetics of valganciclovir and ganciclovir following multiple oral dosages of valganciclovir in HIV- and CMV-seropositive volunteers.

OBJECTIVE: Ganciclovir is commonly used in the treatment of cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease in patients who are immunocompromised and for the prevention of CMV disease in solid organ transplant recipients. Owing to limited bioavailability and saturable absorption, the use of oral ganciclovir in CMV retinitis is restricted to maintenance therapy only. As induction therapy must be given intravenously, an oral formulation which could be used for induction would offer significant benefits. A previous study of valganciclovir, a valyl ester prodrug of ganciclovir showed a 10-fold increase in plasma ganciclovir concentrations compared with the oral formulation. However, before studies can be conducted to confirm the utility of oral valganciclovir for the treatment and prevention of CMV disease, a dose must be selected for use in these studies. This study was designed to investigate the pharmacokinetics of ganciclovir and valganciclovir. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: The study was an open-label, randomised, 4-way crossover, dose-ranging pharmacokinetic study, conducted in 39 patients who were HIV- and CMV-seropositive. The participants were randomised to one of 2 groups: fasted (n = 19) and fed (n = 20). In both groups, participants received 450, 875, 1750 and 2625 mg oral valganciclovir once daily for 3 days in a randomised order. RESULTS: In the 32 participants who completed the study, valganciclovir was rapidly absorbed and converted into ganciclovir (maximum ganciclovir concentrations occurred after 1.0 to 1.75 hours in the fasted group and 1.5 to 2.0 hours in the fed group). Systemic exposure to valganciclovir was low [with an area under the concentration-time curve to 24 hours (AUC24) of 1.3 to 2.5% that of ganciclovir]. The mean plasma concentrations of ganciclovir were dose-related. Peak concentrations of ganciclovir were achieved approximately 30 minutes after those for valganciclovir. In the fed state, the AUC24 of ganciclovir increased proportionally with dose. The mean AUC24 values for ganciclovir were slightly higher following food (24 to 56%) than in the fasted state. Based on linear regression of AUC24 values from the fed group, a dose of valganciclovir of 900 mg/day is expected to produce a daily exposure (AUC24) comparable with an intravenous dose of ganciclovir 5 mg/kg/day. CONCLUSIONS: These results show that once daily oral valganciclovir can produce exposures of ganciclovir (AUC24) exceeding those attained using intravenous ganciclovir 10 mg/kg. This suggests that oral valganciclovir may be suitable in many circumstances currently requiring intravenous ganciclovir, allowing for more convenience in the management of patients with CMV retinitis by utilising a 2 or 4 tablet daily regimen to cover all phases of treatment.     

Management of cytomegalovirus infection in patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome

The clinical manifestations of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in persons with AIDS are described, and recent advances in the management of these syndromes with antiviral agents are reviewed. CMV infection is the most common serious opportunistic viral infection in AIDS patients. Clinical manifestations include chorioretinitis, gastroenteritis, hepatitis, pneumonia, CNS infection, adrenalitis, and a wasting syndrome. The diagnosis of CMV infection requires laboratory demonstration of a serologic response to the virus, detection of viral components or products, or isolation of the virus. Ganciclovir is an acyclic nucleoside analogue marketed for the treatment of CMV-related retinitis in immunocompromised hosts. After i.v. ganciclovir induction therapy, more than 80% of patients show improvement or stabilization of retinitis. Relapse is common in AIDS patients, however, and low-dose i.v. maintenance therapy is recommended. The most serious dose-limiting effect is neutropenia. Intravitreal injection of ganciclovir has been well tolerated and efficacious. Ganciclovir has shown some efficacy in the treatment of other life-threatening CMV infections, especially gastroenteritis, but data are limited. Ganciclovir-resistant strains have been reported. Foscarnet, a pyrophosphate analogue with activity against both human CMV and human immunodeficiency virus, is undergoing clinical trials. Foscarnet has shown promise in the therapy of CMV-related retinitis, but results for other CMV infections are disappointing. Nephrotoxicity is the major dose-limiting effect. AIDS patients with sight-threatening and rapidly progressive CMV-related retinitis should be treated with ganciclovir. Foscarnet may offer an alternative when it becomes available. More must be learned about the efficacy of these drugs in the treatment of CMV infection in patients with AIDS.     

Ganciclovir. A review of its antiviral activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic efficacy in cytomegalovirus infections

Ganciclovir is a nucleoside analogue with antiviral activity in vitro against members of the herpes group and some other DNA viruses. It has demonstrated efficacy against human cytomegalovirus infections and should be considered a first-line therapy in the treatment of life- or sight-threatening cytomegalovirus infection in immunocompromised patients. Clinical efficacy varies with the underlying aetiology of immunocompromise and the site of disease, and prompt diagnosis and early treatment initiation appear to improve the response. In patients with cytomegalovirus pneumonia, particularly bone marrow transplant recipients, concomitant administration of cytomegalovirus immune globulin may significantly improve clinical outcome. Maintenance therapy to prevent recurrence is usually required by bone marrow transplant recipients until the recovery of adequate immune function, whereas AIDS patients may require indefinite ganciclovir maintenance therapy to prevent disease progression, as ganciclovir (like other antivirals) does not eradicate latent viral infection. Haematological effects occur relatively frequently during ganciclovir administration but are usually reversible. Ganciclovir has not been directly compared with other antiviral drugs because of the absence until recently of other effective treatments. However, comparative studies with foscarnet, particularly in cytomegalovirus retinitis, will be of considerable interest. Thus, ganciclovir represents a major advance in the therapy of severe cytomegalovirus infections in immunocompromised patients. Comparative studies, and investigation of ways of reducing toxicity (intravitreal administration; concomitant use of stimulants of haematopoiesis; use in conjunction with other antivirals with differing mechanisms of action), may further expand its eventual role.     

Pharmacokinetic profile of ganciclovir after its oral administration and from its prodrug, valganciclovir, in solid organ transplant recipients

BACKGROUND: Valganciclovir (Valcyte) has recently been approved for the prevention of cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease in high-risk (CMV donor positive [D+]/recipient negative [R-]) solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. Large-scale studies describing the pharmacokinetics of valganciclovir in SOT recipients are lacking. A recent randomised, double-blind study of valganciclovir in 364 D+/R- (intent-to-treat population) SOT recipients provided valuable data on which a population pharmacokinetic analysis was performed. METHODS: The pharmacokinetics of ganciclovir from oral ganciclovir (Cymevene, 1000 mg three times daily) and from valganciclovir (900 mg once daily) were described with plasma levels from 240 patients (1181 datapoints describing 449 pharmacokinetic profiles) using nonlinear mixed-effects modelling (NONMEM) software. A two-compartment pharmacokinetic model with separate absorption/metabolism and absorption parameters for valganciclovir and ganciclovir, respectively, was developed. RESULTS: Exposure to ganciclovir from valganciclovir averaged 1.65-fold greater than that from oral ganciclovir (95% CI 1.58, 1.81); respective daily area under the plasma concentration-time curve values were 46.3 +/- 15.2 microg . h/mL and 28.0 +/- 10.9 microg . h/mL. The relative systemic exposure of ganciclovir was approximately 8-fold higher from valganciclovir than oral ganciclovir. Exposure to ganciclovir from valganciclovir was similar among liver, heart and kidney transplant recipients (46.0 +/- 16.1, 40.2 +/- 11.8 and 48.2 +/- 14.6 microg . h/ mL, respectively). Adherence to the prescribed dosing regimens, which were reduced for renal impairment, gave consistent exposure to ganciclovir. CONCLUSION: Oral valganciclovir produces exposures of ganciclovir exceeding those attained with oral ganciclovir, but in line with those reported after standard intravenous administration of ganciclovir. This indicates that oral valganciclovir is suitable in circumstances requiring prophylactic use of ganciclovir and allows for more convenient management of patients at risk of CMV disease.     

Valganciclovir

Valganciclovir is a prodrug of ganciclovir which has been developed for the treatment of cytomegalovirus (CMV) retinitis in patients with AIDS. Oral valganciclovir is rapidly absorbed and hydrolysed to ganciclovir. The oral bioavailability of ganciclovir after oral valganciclovir administration is high. Oral valganciclovir 900 mg provides a daily exposure of ganciclovir comparable to that of intravenous ganciclovir 5 mg/kg. A single, randomised, nonblind study indicated that oral valganciclovir (900mg twice daily for 3 weeks then 900 mg once daily) and intravenous ganciclovir (5 mg/kg twice daily for 3 weeks then 5 mg/kg once daily) were equally effective in the treatment of newly diagnosed CMV retinitis in 160 patients with AIDS. Valganciclovir appears to have a similar tolerability profile to intravenous ganciclovir during induction therapy in patients with AIDS and newly diagnosed CMV retinitis. During maintenance therapy with valganciclovir, the most commonly reported adverse events included neutropenia, anaemia, thrombocytopenia, gastrointestinal (including diarrhoea, nausea, vomiting and abdominal pain), fever, headache, insomnia, peripheral neuropathy, paraesthesia and retinal detachment.     

Valganciclovir: oral prevention and treatment of cytomegalovirus in the immunocompromised host

Herpes virus infections, particularly those caused by cytomegalovirus (CMV), lead to significant and, sometimes severe, clinical problems for the immunocompromised host. As effective agents have become available, several treatment and prevention strategies have evolved over the past decade, first in intra-venous form and more recently, as oral preparations. Valganciclovir, the valine ester of ganciclovir, is an orally administered, potent, antiviral agent active against all herpes viruses. When taken orally, valganciclovir has much-improved bioavailability compared with oral ganciclovir and achieves ganciclovir exposures similar to intravenous ganciclovir. Clinical trials evaluating the safety and efficacy of valganciclovir for the treatment of new AIDS-associated CMV retinitis showed equivalency to intravenous ganciclovir and prevented progression of quiescent disease. In solid organ recipients, once-daily valganciclovir has been proven equivalent to oral ganciclovir for the prevention of CMV infection. The high bioavailability and convenient dosing formulation make valganciclovir an attractive option for these indications.     

Valganciclovir: oral prevention and treatment of cytomegalovirus in the immunocompromised host

Herpes virus infections, particularly those caused by cytomegalovirus (CMV), lead to significant and, sometimes severe, clinical problems for the immunocompromised host. As effective agents have become available, several treatment and prevention strategies have evolved over the past decade, first in intra-venous form and more recently, as oral preparations. Valganciclovir, the valine ester of ganciclovir, is an orally administered, potent, antiviral agent active against all herpes viruses. When taken orally, valganciclovir has much-improved bioavailability compared with oral ganciclovir and achieves ganciclovir exposures similar to intravenous ganciclovir. Clinical trials evaluating the safety and efficacy of valganciclovir for the treatment of new AIDS-associated CMV retinitis showed equivalency to intravenous ganciclovir and prevented progression of quiescent disease. In solid organ recipients, once-daily valganciclovir has been proven equivalent to oral ganciclovir for the prevention of CMV infection. The high bioavailability and convenient dosing formulation make valganciclovir an attractive option for these indications.