Diagnosis of sacroiliac joint pain: validity of individual provocation tests and composites of tests

Previous research indicates that physical examination cannot diagnose sacroiliac joint (SIJ) pathology. Earlier studies have not reported sensitivities and specificities of composites of provocation tests known to have acceptable inter-examiner reliability. This study examined the diagnostic power of pain provocation SIJ tests singly and in various combinations, in relation to an accepted criterion standard. In a blinded criterion-related validity design, 48 patients were examined by physiotherapists using pain provocation SIJ tests and received an injection of local anaesthetic into the SIJ. The tests were evaluated singly and in various combinations (composites) for diagnostic power. All patients with a positive response to diagnostic injection reported pain with at least one SIJ test. Sensitivity and specificity for three or more of six positive SIJ tests were 94% and 78%, respectively. Receiver operator characteristic curves and areas under the curve were constructed for various composites. The greatest area under the curve for any two of the best four tests was 0.842. In conclusion, composites of provocation SIJ tests are of value in clinical diagnosis of symptomatic SIJ. Three or more out of six tests or any two of four selected tests have the best predictive power in relation to results of intra-articular anaesthetic block injections. When all six provocation tests do not provoke familiar pain, the SIJ can be ruled out as a source of current LBP.     

Ultrasound-Guided Versus Fluoroscopy-Guided Sacroiliac Joint Intra-articular Injections in the Noninflammatory Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction: A Prospective,Randomized, Single-Blinded Study

Objective

To compare the short-term effects and safety of ultrasound (US)-guided sacroiliac joint (SIJ) injections with fluoroscopy (FL)-guided SIJ injections in patients with noninflammatory SIJ dysfunction.

Design

Prospective, randomized controlled trial.

Setting

University hospital.

Participants

Patients (N=120) with noninflammatory sacroiliac arthritis were enrolled.

Intervention

All procedures were performed using an FL or US apparatus. Subjects were randomly assigned to either the FL or US group. Immediately after the SIJ injections, fluoroscopy was applied to verify the correct placement of the injected medication and intravascular injections.

Main Outcome Measures

Treatment effects and functional improvement were compared at 2 and 12 weeks after the procedures.

Results

The verbal numeric pain scale and Oswestry Disability Index improved at 2 and 12 weeks after the injections without statistical significances between groups. Of 55 US-guided injections, 48 (87.3%) were successful and 7 (12.7%) were missed. The FL-guided SIJ approach exhibited a greater accuracy (98.2%) than the US-guided approach. Vascularization around the SIJ was seen in 34 of 55 patients. Among the 34 patients, 7 had vascularization inside the joint, 23 had vascularization around the joint, and 4 had vascularization both inside and around the joint. Three cases of intravascular injections occurred in the FL group.

Conclusions

The US-guided approach may facilitate the identification and avoidance of the critical vessels around or within the SIJ. Function and pain relief significantly improved in both groups without significant differences between groups. The US-guided approach was shown to be as effective as the FL-guided approach in treatment effects. However, diagnostic application in the SIJ may be limited because of the significantly lower accuracy rate (87.3%).     

A multitest regimen of pain provocation tests as an aid to reduce unnecessary minimally invasive sacroiliac joint procedures

OBJECTIVE: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of a multitest regimen of 5 sacroiliac joint (SIJ) pain provocation tests with fluoroscopically controlled double SIJ blocks using a short- and long-acting local anesthetic in order to reduce the exposure of patients to unnecessary invasive SIJ procedures. DESIGN: Prospective, observational study. SETTING: Hospital setting. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty patients with chronic low back pain. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Visual analog scale score and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients responded positively to the blocks, of whom 23 were found positive after the multitest regimen and 4 were negative. For the nonresponders (n=33), these figures were 7 positive and 26 negative. The calculated sensitivity and specificity were .85 (95% confidence interval [CI], .72-.99) and .79 (95% CI, .65-.93), respectively. Positive and negative predictive values were .77 (95% CI, .62-.92) and .87 (95% CI, .74-.99), respectively. The positive likelihood ratio was 4.02 (95% CI, 2.04-7.89); the negative likelihood ratio was .19 (95% CI, .07-.47). The area under the ROC curve was .799. CONCLUSIONS: The test regimen with 3 or more positive tests is indicative of SIJ pain. It can be used in early clinical decision making to reduce the number of unnecessary minimally invasive diagnostic SIJ procedures.     

Fluoroscopy-guided Sacroiliac Joint Injections with Phenol Ablation for Persistent Sacroiliitis: A Case Series

Abstract: In this article we are reporting on the use of fluoroscopy‐guided 6% Phenol injections for the ablation of the sacroiliac joints (SIJs), utilizing retrospective review of case reports. We reviewed 10 patients (7 male and 3 female) who have known sacroiliitis proven by fluoroscopically guided sacroiliac joint (SIJ) injection (age ranged from 25 to 78). They all had 2 to 4 weeks of relief after the injections utilizing Bupivacaine 0.5% and 80 mg of depomedrol. They all had repeat fluoroscopy‐guided injections of the SIJs with neurolysis of either a unilateral SIJ or bilateral SIJs using 6% Phenol. Phenol 6% with saline 2.5 cc per joint was injected; the needle was cleared with local anesthetic before removing it from the joint. Twenty percent of the patients had a greater than 70% improvement with an average duration of 24 weeks. Sixty percent of the patients had a 50% to 70% improvement with an average duration of 20 weeks. Ten percent had a 20% to 50% improvement with a total duration of 12 1/2 weeks. Ten percent had a less than 20% improvement. With intra‐articular injections of phenol for the ablation of the SIJs, we have found a significant improvement in pain relief accompanied by prolonged duration of relief.     

Fluoroscopically guided therapeutic sacroiliac joint injections for sacroiliac joint syndrome

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the outcomes resulting from the use of fluoroscopically guided therapeutic sacroiliac joint injections in patients with sacroiliac joint syndrome. DESIGN: A retrospective study design with independent clinical review was utilized. Thirty-one patients were included; each patient met specific physical examination criteria and failed to improve clinically after at least 4 wk of physical therapy. Each patient demonstrated a positive response to a fluoroscopically guided diagnostic sacroiliac joint injection. Therapeutic sacroiliac joint injections were administered in conjunction with physical therapy. Outcome measures included Oswestry scores, Visual Analog Scale pain scores, work status, and medication usage. RESULTS: Patients' symptom duration before diagnostic injection averaged 20.6 mo. An average of 2.1 therapeutic injections was administered. Follow-up data collection was obtained at an average of 94.4 wk. A significant reduction (P = 0.0014) in Oswestry disability score was observed at the time of follow-up. Visual Analog Scale pain scores were reduced (P < 0.0001) at the time of discharge and at follow-up. Work status was also significantly improved at the time of discharge (P = 0.0313) and at follow-up (P = 0.0010). A trend (P = 0.0645) toward less drug usage was observed. CONCLUSIONS: These initial findings suggest that fluoroscopically guided therapeutic sacroiliac joint injections are a clinically effective intervention in the treatment of patients with sacroiliac joint syndrome. Controlled, prospective studies are necessary to further clarify the role of therapeutic injections in this patient population.     

Sacroiliac joint fusion and the implications for manual therapy diagnosis and treatment

The present paper examines gender differences and changes in prevalence of ankylosed sacroiliac joint (SIJ) with age. SIJs of 287 patients (159 males and 128 females), aged 22-93 years, were examined for fusion, using 3-D CT images. Presence, side and location of the fusion along the joint borders were recorded. Fusion of the SIJ was found to be gender and age dependent; present in 27.7% of all males in contrast to only 3.0% in females (p<0.001). The phenomenon increased with age in the male population from 5.8% in the 20-39 age cohorts to 46.7% in the 80+ cohort. As mobilization and/or manipulation of a dysfunctional SIJ are common procedures used by manual therapists, the effect that aging has on SIJ mobility requires therapists to alter or change their method with advancing age.     

Examination of the innominate movements in individuals with and without a positive march test

[Purpose] The March Test (MT), evaluating hypomobility of the sacroiliac joint (SIJ), is often used in clinical practice to evaluate low back pain but has limited reported validity and reliability. Capturing the innominate movement at SIJ associated with the results of MT has not been examined. The purpose of this study was to determine if there was a significant difference in the motion of the innominate between a positive and a negative MT. [Participants and Methods] Sixteen healthy volunteers were assigned into two groups: positive or negative results of the MT. All participants were asked to perform three different tasks: standing on both limbs, static standing on one-limb and flexing the hip to 90 and 100 degrees, and active flexing the hip past 90 degrees. In a 3D motion analysis system, virtual vectors created by landmarks over the ilium defined innominate movement of the ilium related to the sacrum, which were compared between the groups. [Results] There was significantly limited innominate movement in the March Test positive group compared to the March Test negative group. [Conclusion] This study showed hypomobility at SIJ in the March test positive groups. Further investigation is needed for clinical applications.Key words: March test, Sacroiliac joint, Innominate     

Audit of conservative management of chronic low back pain in a secondary care setting--part I: facet joint and sacroiliac joint interventions

The work of a chronic back pain service in secondary care in the West Midlands is reported. The service offers acupuncture, spinal injection procedures, osteopathy and a range of other interventions for patients whose back pain has not responded to conservative management. This section of the report focuses on injection procedures for lumbar facet joint and sacroiliac joint pain, which have been shown to be the cause of chronic low back pain in 16-40% and 13-19% of patients respectively. Diagnosis relies on the use of intra-articular or sensory nerve block injections with local anaesthetic. Possible treatments following diagnosis include intra-articular corticosteroid, radiofrequency denervation (for facet joint pain) or ligament prolotherapy injections (for sacroiliac joint pain). The results of several hospital audits are reported. At six month follow up, 50% of 38 patients undergoing radiofrequency denervation following diagnostic blocks for facet joint pain had improved by more than 50%, compared to 29% of 34 patients treated with intra-articular corticosteroid injection. Sixty three per cent of 19 patients undergoing prolotherapy following diagnostic block injection for sacroiliac joint pain had improved at six months, compared to 33% of 33 who had intra-articular corticosteroid. Both radiofrequency denervation and sacroiliac prolotherapy showed good long-term outcomes at one year.     

Evaluation of the presence of sacroiliac joint region dysfunction using a combination of tests: a multicenter intertester reliability study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The authors examined the intertester reliability of assessments made based on a composite of 4 tests of pelvic symmetry or sacroiliac joint (SIJ) movement that are advocated in the literature for identifying people with SIJ region dysfunction. "Sacroiliac joint region dysfunction" is a term used to describe pain in or around the region of the joint that is presumed to be due to malalignment or abnormal movement of the SIJs. SUBJECTS: Sixty-five patients with low back pain and unilateral buttock pain were seen in 1 of 11 outpatient clinics. METHODS: Thirty-four therapists, randomly paired for each subject, served as examiners. Kappa coefficients and observed proportions of positive (Ppos) and negative (Pneg) agreement were calculated to estimate reliability. RESULTS: For the composite test results, percentages of agreement ranged from 60% to 69%, kappa coefficients varied from.11 to.23, and Ppos was lower than 50%. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Reliability of measurements obtained with the 4 tests appears to be too low for clinical use. Given the measurement error found in this study, the authors suspect it is likely that either the proper treatment technique will not be chosen based on the test results or the intervention will be applied to the wrong side. The 4 tests probably should not be used to examine patients suspected of having SIJ region dysfunction, although the role of therapist training in use of the procedures is unclear.     

Schmerzen und Funktionsstörungen des Iliosakralgelenks bei Bandscheibenvorfällen der unteren Lendenwirbelsäule

Back and leg pain in patients with lumbar disc herniation can be caused by various mechanisms. In addition to nerve root compression, functional alterations in the sacroiliac joint, facet joint or the iliolumbar and sacrotuberal ligaments can produce "pseudoradicular" lower back syndrome. The following study attempts to show whether or not pain and functional alterations in the sacroiliac joint (SIJ) correlate with herniations revealed by computed tomography (CT). The study also attempts to determine the correlation between pain and functional changes of the SIJ and the size and level of the disc herniation. Fifty patients with monosegmental disc herniations revealed by CT who showed no signs of bone or soft tissue alterations were included in this study. The average duration of the patients' complaints of leg or back pain was 5.7 years. Ninety-six percent of these patients had received conservative treatment before admission to our hospital. All patients were compared to a control group consisting of 16 healthy subjects of comparable age. All patients underwent a comprehensive functional, neurologic and radiologic examination. The CTs were analyzed by a standardized three-dimensional method. All of the 50 patients had sciatica complaints and a disc herniation revealed by CT. In two cases hemiation of the L3-4 disc was demonstrated, in 14 cases L4-5 disc herniation and in 34 cases a L5-S1 disc herniation. In contrast to the control group of 15 healthy subjects, the patients showed a significant number of functional disorders upon examination. In 84% of all patients, movement of the SIJ was restricted. Painful palpation of the symphysis was demonstrated in 46% of all cases. Thirty-five percent of patients with herniation of L4-5 disc demonstrated SIJ tenderness as opposed to 65% of the patients with herniation of the L5-S1 disc. This SIJ tenderness did not correlate with motion of the SIJ. In addition, SIJ motion and frequency of sensory dysfunction showed no correlation with the size of the disc herniation. Paralysis and loss of reflexes showed a positive correlation with the increasing size of the disc herniation. SIJ tenderness decreased as the size of the herniation increased. Dysfunction of the ipsilateral SIJ is explained by increased muscular tone caused by irritation of the n. sinuvertebralis and its lumbar coupling. Frequency of SIJ tenderness is significantly higher in patients with herniations between L5 and S1. Since the SIJ is innervated by the r. dorsalis of the sacral roots, the increased tenderness can be explained by the change in neurovegetative innervation of the SIJ. Due to the high correlation between lumbar disc herniation and SIJ dysfunction, disc herniation should be considered as a possible cause of sacroiliac-joint syndrome.     

Diagnosing painful sacroiliac joints: A validity study of a McKenzie evaluation and sacroiliac provocation tests

Research suggests that clinical examination of the lumbar spine and pelvis is unable to predict the results of diagnostic injections used as reference standards. The purpose of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of a clinical examination in identifying symptomatic and asymptomatic sacroiliac joints using double diagnostic injections as the reference standard. In a blinded concurrent criterion-related validity design study, 48 patients with chronic lumbopelvic pain referred for diagnostic spinal injection procedures were examined using a specific clinical examination and received diagnostic intraarticular sacroiliac joint injections. The centralisation and peripheralisation phenomena were used to identify possible discogenic pain and the results from provocation sacroiliac joint tests were used as part of the clinical reasoning process. Eleven patients had sacroiliac joint pain confirmed by double diagnostic injection. Ten of the 11 sacroiliac joint patients met clinical examination criteria for having sacroiliac joint pain. In the primary subset analysis of 34 patients, sensitivity, specificity and positive likelihood ratio (95% confidence intervals) of the clinical evaluation were 91% (62 to 98), 83% (68 to 96) and 6.97(2.70 to 20.27) respectively. The diagnostic accuracy of the clinical examination and clinical reasoning process was superior to the sacroiliac joint pain provocation tests alone. A specific clinical examination and reasoning process can differentiate between symptomatic and asymptomatic sacroiliac joints     

Clinical Prediction Rules: Time to Sacrifice the Holy Cow

Abstract

It has been suggested that tight hamstring muscle, due to its anatomical connections, could be a compensatory mechanism for providing sacroiliac (SI) joint stability in patients with gluteal muscle weakness and SIJ dysfunction. The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between hamstring muscle length and gluteal muscle strength in subjects with sacroiliac joint dysfunction. A total of 159 subjects with and without low back pain (LBP) between the ages of 20 and 65?years participate in the study. Subjects were categorized into three groups: LBP without SIJ involvement (n?=?53); back pain with SIJ dysfunction (n?=?53); and no low back pain (n?=?53). Hamstring muscle length and gluteal muscle strength were measured in all subjects. The number of individuals with gluteal weakness was significantly (P?=?0·02) higher in subjects with SI joint dysfunction (66%) compared to those with LBP without SI joint dysfunctions (34%). In pooled data, there was no significant difference (P?=?0·31) in hamstring muscle length between subjects with SI joint dysfunction and those with back pain without SI involvement. In subjects with SI joint dysfunction, however, those with gluteal muscle weakness had significantly (P?=?0·02) shorter hamstring muscle length (mean?=?158±11°) compared to individuals without gluteal weakness (mean?=?165±10°). There was no statistically significant difference (P>0·05) in hamstring muscle length between individuals with and without gluteal muscle weakness in other groups. In conclusion, hamstring tightness in subjects with SI joint dysfunction could be related to gluteal muscle weakness. The slight difference in hamstring muscle length found in this study, although statistically significant, was not sufficient for making any definite conclusions. Further studies are needed to establish the role of hamstring muscle in SI joint stability.     

The relationship between hamstring length and gluteal muscle strength in individuals with sacroiliac joint dysfunction

It has been suggested that tight hamstring muscle, due to its anatomical connections, could be a compensatory mechanism for providing sacroiliac (SI) joint stability in patients with gluteal muscle weakness and SIJ dysfunction. The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between hamstring muscle length and gluteal muscle strength in subjects with sacroiliac joint dysfunction. A total of 159 subjects with and without low back pain (LBP) between the ages of 20 and 65 years participate in the study. Subjects were categorized into three groups: LBP without SIJ involvement (n = 53); back pain with SIJ dysfunction (n = 53); and no low back pain (n = 53). Hamstring muscle length and gluteal muscle strength were measured in all subjects. The number of individuals with gluteal weakness was significantly (P = 0.02) higher in subjects with SI joint dysfunction (66%) compared to those with LBP without SI joint dysfunctions (34%). In pooled data, there was no significant difference (P = 0.31) in hamstring muscle length between subjects with SI joint dysfunction and those with back pain without SI involvement. In subjects with SI joint dysfunction, however, those with gluteal muscle weakness had significantly (P = 0.02) shorter hamstring muscle length (mean = 158±11°) compared to individuals without gluteal weakness (mean = 165±10°). There was no statistically significant difference (P>0.05) in hamstring muscle length between individuals with and without gluteal muscle weakness in other groups. In conclusion, hamstring tightness in subjects with SI joint dysfunction could be related to gluteal muscle weakness. The slight difference in hamstring muscle length found in this study, although statistically significant, was not sufficient for making any definite conclusions. Further studies are needed to establish the role of hamstring muscle in SI joint stability.     

Intertester reliability for selected clinical tests of the sacroiliac joint

The purpose of this study was to examine the intertester reliability of 13 tests for sacroiliac joint (SIJ) dysfunction. Eight therapists examined 17 patients in two clinical settings. In each case, two therapists independently examined the patients and obtained results on all 13 of the SIJ tests. Patients with lumbosacral pain and unilateral lower extremity symptoms of a duration less than one year were examined. All the therapists had specialized in orthopedic physical therapy and had been trained in SIJ examination. Reliability was poor; 11 of the 13 tests resulted in less than 70% agreement. The two tests that relied solely on subjective patient response and imparted no information on SIJ position or mobility were within a range of 70% to 90% agreement. Our findings suggest the necessity of reviewing examination methods for the SIJ and improving reliability of clinical testing of this joint.     

Use of ultrasound–magnetic resonance image fusion to guide sacroiliac joint injections: a preliminary assessment

Background

The sacroiliac joint is one of the sources of chronic lower back pain. Intra-articular injections of anesthetic drugs and/or steroids are currently used in these cases for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. However, given the anatomic and functional complexity of the joint, imaging guidance is mandatory during such procedures. In this context, the technique of fusing images obtained with two different modalities can often overcome the limitations and enhance the advantages of single-modality guidance.

Aim

The aim of this study was to evaluate the technique of ultrasound (US)–magnetic resonance (MR) image fusion to guide intra-articular injections of drugs into the sacroiliac joint.

Materials and methods

We evaluated seven sacroiliac joints in six patients with sacroiliac pain syndrome (four females, two males; mean age 59 years; range 46–76 years). Five were candidates for radiofrequency thermolysis, and a therapeutic nerve block was performed in the sixth. Using the volume navigation system, we fused three-dimensional MR images with simultaneously acquired real-time ultrasound images and used them to guide the intra-articular injections.

Results

In all patients, spatial accuracy was considered excellent, with definition of registration errors of less than 3 mm. The diagnostic blocks produced positive results in all patients with 80 % reductions in pain (measured with a Numerical Rating Scale, NRS) relative to baseline. The patient who underwent the therapeutic nerve block experienced complete resolution of symptoms that has been maintained over time. There were no complications.

Conclusions

US–MR imaging fusion guidance of sacroiliac joint injections is feasible and effective, in accordance with the data in the literature. The use of the MR for three-dimensional imaging eliminates the risk of radiation exposure.     

X线平片、CT及MRI在强直性脊柱炎骶髂关节病变诊断中的应用价值

目的探讨X线平片、计算机断层扫描(CT)及磁共振成像(MRI)在强直性脊柱炎骶髂关节病变诊断中的应用价值。方法选取2015年8月至2019年12月我院收治的57例强直性脊柱炎患者作为研究对象,均行X线平片、CT及MRI检查。以ASAS临床诊断为金标准,比较X线平片、CT、MRI对强直性脊柱炎患者骶髂关节病变的诊断结果。结果57例强直性脊柱炎患者中,43例发生骶髂关节病变。MRI对强直性脊柱炎患者骶髂关节病变的诊断灵敏度、特异度、准确度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值高于X线平片与CT(P<0.05);CT对强直性脊柱炎患者骶髂关节病变的诊断灵敏度、特异度、准确度、阴性预测值高于X线平片(P<0.05)。MRI对Ⅰ级、Ⅱ级骶髂关节病变的诊断符合率高于X线平片与CT(P<0.05)。MRI对关节面侵蚀、关节面下骨质囊变、关节软骨囊肿的诊断符合率高于X线平片与CT(P<0.05)。结论在强直性脊柱炎患者骶髂关节病变诊断中,MRI的诊断准确性优于X线平片和CT,其不仅能够有效检出骶髂关节病变,而且能对不同分级、不同类型骶髂关节病变进行鉴别。     

Fluoroscopically Guided vs Landmark-Guided Sacroiliac Joint Injections: A Randomized Controlled Study

Objectives

To determine the prevalence of intra- and extra-articular sacroiliac joint (SIJ) pain, which injection is more beneficial, and whether fluoroscopy improves outcomes.