Anismus: a marker of multi-site functional disorders?

PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to assess the clinical significance of anismus in patients who complain of constipation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty control subjects and 93 consecutive patients complaining of functional constipation took part in the study. Colonic transit time study and anorectal manometry were performed. Questions about depression and urinary and sexual diseases were added to a questionnaire based on the Rome II criteria, and visual analog scales about four items (constipation, diarrhoea, abdominal bloating and abdominal pain). RESULTS: Constipated patients have lower threshold sensation volume, lower constant sensation volume, and lower maximum tolerable volume than controls. Thirty-seven patients (40%) were found to have anismus, based on anorectal manometry. No significant difference was found between constipated patients with anismus and constipated patients without anismus, using anorectal manometry. Constipated patients had longer colorectal transit time than controls, but neither total nor segmental colonic transit time was correlated with the presence or absence of anismus. In patients with anismus, a higher frequency of oesophageal symptoms, dysmotility-like dyspepsia, aerophagia, functional bowel disorders, functional abdominal pain, soiling, and dyschezia was found. In addition, a higher frequency of urinary complaints, sexual complaints, and depression was found. Anismus was associated with increased awareness of constipation, abdominal bloating, and abdominal pain, but not with diarrhoea.     

Gastrointestinal symptoms in patients with end-stage renal disease undergoing treatment by hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of gastrointestinal symptoms in patients with end-stage renal disease undergoing hemodialysis (HD) or peritoneal dialysis (PD) treatment. METHODS: Patients undergoing HD or chronic ambulatory PD in the Department of Renal Medicine of our hospital were asked to complete a locally validated Rome II questionnaire. The same questionnaire was also administered to age- and gender-matched medical outpatients without renal failure, and community subjects. Patients on HD and their outpatient controls also completed the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. RESULTS: A total of 148 patients with end-stage renal disease (HD 100, PD 48) completed the study. Their results were compared with those of 148 age- and gender-matched medical outpatients without renal failure and 148 randomly selected community controls. Patients on dialysis treatment were more likely to have abdominal pain, use laxatives, and report symptoms consistent with functional vomiting and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) (70%, 55%, 16%, and 25%) than age- and gender-matched medical outpatients without renal failure (21%, 11%, 1%, and 6%) and community controls (16%, 4%, 0%, and 8%). Among HD patients and their outpatient controls, the differences appeared to be unrelated to anxiety or depression. CONCLUSIONS: Abdominal pain, laxative use, functional vomiting, and IBS were more common in uremic individuals than in controls without renal failure. Our data have not shown whether these differences are due to the uremic state itself, or, alternatively, its treatment.     

Should patients with combined colonic inertia and nonrelaxing pelvic floor undergo subtotal colectomy?

PURPOSE: Treatment of severe constipation caused by combined colonic inertia and nonrelaxing pelvic floor is controversial. This study is designed to evaluate the outcome of preoperative biofeedback and subtotal colectomy for patients with combined colonic inertia and nonrelaxing pelvic floor. METHODS: One hundred six patients who underwent subtotal colectomy for intractable constipation from 1982 through 1995 answered a detailed questionnaire regarding postoperative bowel function, symptoms of abdominal pain and bloating, and degree of satisfaction after the operation. Sixteen of these patients had a combination of colonic inertia and nonrelaxing pelvic floor diagnosed by transit marker study, electromyography, and defecography. These patients completed preoperative biofeedback training. RESULTS: Electromyographic relaxation of pelvic floor musculature was demonstrated after the biofeedback treatment in all patients, but symptoms of difficult evacuation persisted. Postoperatively, seven patients (43 percent) had complete resolution of symptoms of constipation or difficult evacuation. Six patients still complained of incomplete evacuation that was severe in two and unresponsive to postoperative biofeedback. Three patients (18 percent) complained of diarrhea (>5 bowel movements per day) and incontinence of liquid stools (at least one episode a week). Nine patients (56 percent) were satisfied despite persistent symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Subtotal colectomy can improve some symptoms in patients with slow transit constipation and nonrelaxing pelvic floor. However, incomplete evacuation persists in a significant number of patients and almost one-half of patients are dissatisfied with their surgery.     

Efficacy of anorectal biofeedback in scleroderma patients with fecal incontinence: a case–control study

Objective: To determine whether anorectal biofeedback therapy can improve the symptoms of fecal incontinence (FI) in patients with scleroderma when compared to patients with functional FI, and also whether there is any effect on anorectal physiology or quality of life (QOL). FI in patients with scleroderma is highly prevalent and is associated with significant loss of QOL. Biofeedback has been proven to be an effective treatment for functional FI, but there are no data to support its use in scleroderma.

Materials and methods: 13 consecutive female patients (median age 59, IQR 47–65 years) with scleroderma, and 26 age- and parity-matched female patients with functional FI (disease controls, 2:1), underwent biofeedback therapy for management of FI. Fecal incontinence severity index (FISI), anorectal physiology, feeling of control and QOL were collected before and after 6 weeks of biofeedback therapy, with additional scoring repeated at 6-month follow-up.

Results: After biofeedback treatment FISI, feeling of control and QOL significantly improved in both groups (p?p?Conclusions: Patients with scleroderma benefit from biofeedback therapy to the same extent as that achieved in patients with functional FI. There are significant improvements in symptoms, physiology and QOL. Biofeedback is an effective, low-risk treatment option in this patient group.     

Abdominal Symptoms and Anorectal Function in Health and Irritable Bowel Syndrome

Background: It is unclear how the quality and quantity of abdominal symptoms and anorectal function differ between irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) patients and healthy controls, and whether different anorectal function in patients is associated with abdominal symptoms in IBS. Methods: Fifty-two outpatients with IBS and 12 healthy controls kept daily symptom records over 1 week. At the end of the week, anorectal function was assessed by manovolumetry before and after a standard fatty meal. Patients were divided into symptom and manovolumetric subgroups using a cluster analysis and also into those below (hypersensitive) and those within (normosensitive) the 95% confidence interval of the controls' mean for maximal tolerable distension (MTD). Results: Regardless of subgroup, the patients were distinguished from the controls by pain, bloating, straining and incomplete evacuation. Compared with controls, MTD was lower in the pain/bloating subgroup characterized by considerable pain and the bowel habit subgroup characterized by hard stools, variable stool consistency and heavily disturbed stool passage. Preprandial rectal hypersensitivity was highly prevalent in this bowel habit subgroup. No similar association with the pain/bloating subgroup was found. Patients and controls showed a significant and similar postprandial decrease in MTD. Conclusions: IBS is distinguished from health by pain, bloating, straining and a feeling of incomplete evcuation. Baseline rectal hypersensitivity is associated with constipation-like bowel habit. Increased rectal sensitivity after a meal and/or preceding distension is a normal reaction unimportant in the genesis of symptoms in IBS.     

A Prospective,Randomized, Controlled Multicenter Trial Comparing Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy and Ferguson Hemorrhoidectomy: Perioperative and One-Year Results

PURPOSE There is a growing body of evidence supporting the lesser degrees of pain with stapled hemorrhoidopexy, also called the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids. However, there have been few randomized comparisons assessing both perioperative and long-term outcomes of the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids and Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy. Results are presented here from the first prospective, randomized, multicenter trial comparing these hemorrhoid procedures in the United States.METHODS Patients with prolapsing hemorrhoids (Grade III) were randomized to undergo the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids or Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy by colorectal surgeons who had training in using the stapling technique. Primary end points were acute postoperative pain, and hemorrhoid symptom recurrence requiring additional treatment at one-year follow-up from surgery.RESULTS A total of 156 patients (procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids, 77; Ferguson, 79) completed randomization and the surgical procedure, 18 (procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids, 12; Ferguson, 6) had significant protocol violations. One hundred seventeen patients (procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids, 59; Ferguson, 58) returned for one-year follow-up. Demographic parameters, hemorrhoid symptoms, preoperative pain scores, and bowel habits were similar between groups. There were a similar number of patients with adverse events in each group (procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids, 28 (36.4 percent) vs. Ferguson, 38 (48.1 percent); P = 0.138). Reoperation for an adverse effect was required in six (7.6 percent) Ferguson patients and in 0 patients having the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (P = 0.028). Postoperative pain during the first 14 days, pain at first bowel movement, and need for postoperative analgesics were significantly less in the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids group. Control of hemorrhoid symptoms was similar between groups; however, significantly fewer patients having the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids required additional anorectal procedures during one-year follow-up (procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids, 2 (2.6 percent), vs. Ferguson, 11 (13.9 percent); P = 0.01). Only four of the Ferguson patients (5 interventions) required additional procedures more than 30 days after surgery.CONCLUSIONS These data demonstrate that stapled hemorrhoidopexy offers the benefits of less postoperative pain, less requirement for analgesics, and less pain at first bowel movement, while providing similar control of symptoms and need for additional hemorrhoid treatment at one-year follow-up from surgery.Supported by Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Cincinnati, Ohio.Read at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Chicago, Illinois, June 3 to 8, 2002. Winner of The New England Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Award.     

Bowel frequency and defecatory patterns in children: a prospective nationwide survey.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Very little is known about several aspects of bowel habits in the general pediatric population and the aim of this nationwide survey was to assess bowel frequency and modalities of defecation in children. METHODS: The survey was conducted by 58 pediatricians who were selected randomly and distributed evenly throughout Italy. The following items were reported by each pediatrician in a standardized questionnaire: sociodemographic data, frequency and modalities of bowel evacuation, and anorectal disorders. RESULTS: The response rate of available completed questionnaires was distributed evenly for the 1-year age group and was 94% (number of patients, 2680; 1-2 years, 442; females, 49.8%). Mean bowel frequency did not vary in the first 2 years of life, it decreased (P = .00001) after the second year, and remained stable until the 12th year; it did not differ between sexes. Mean bowel frequency was reduced significantly in children, both in those younger or older than 2 years, with a positive history of constipation in the parents (P = .00002). Bowel frequency was inversely correlated with the number of persons living and the number of rooms in the child's house (P < .05, P = .008, respectively). Stool consistency, duration of evacuation, and frequency of episodes of painful defecation showed an inverse relationship (P < .001) with bowel frequency. Bowel frequency was significantly lower (P < .001) in children with anorectal disorders. CONCLUSIONS: In Italian children, bowel frequency does not differ between sexes but it differed between the first 2 years of life and age older than 2. Anorectal disorders increase as bowel frequency decreases.     

Relationship of portal pressure, anorectal varices and hemorrhoids in cirrhotic patients.

In a prospective study of 103 consecutive cirrhotic patients a high prevalence (43%) of anorectal varices was found compared with only 2% in 103 age- and sex-matched control subjects (p less than 0.001). However, there was no significant difference between the prevalences of hemorrhoids in cirrhotic patients and in control subjects (79% vs. 83%, p greater than 0.05). The hepatic venous pressure gradient of cirrhotic patients with anorectal varices was similar to cirrhotic patients without anorectal varices (14 +/- 6 mmHg, n = 22, vs. 16 +/- 7 mmHg, n = 39, p greater than 0.05. There was no significant difference in the hepatic venous pressure gradient between cirrhotic patients with and without hemorrhoids (15 +/- 6 mmHg, n = 47, vs. 16 +/- 8 mmHg, n = 14, p greater than 0.05). The prevalence of anorectal varices and hemorrhoids in cirrhotic patients had no relation to Child-Pugh's grading, esophageal varices with and without sclerotherapy and ascites. We conclude that anorectal varices are common in cirrhotic patients. Anorectal varices and hemorrhoids are not related to the degree of portal pressure.     

Self-perceived normality in defecation habits

BACKGROUND: Available information on normal bowel habits was mainly gathered by means of telephone interviews or mailed questionnaires. AIMS: We undertook a prospective study to evaluate the defecatory habits in subjects perceiving themselves as normal concerning this function. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A questionnaire (4-week diary with "yes-no" daily answers to six questions concerning bowel habits) was distributed to 204 subjects perceiving their defecation behaviour as normal. RESULTS: The completed questionnaire was returned by 140 subjects. No significant differences were found between sexes or age groups for any variable, even though straining at stool and feeling of incomplete and/or difficult evacuation showed a trend to increase with age. No subject had less than three bowel movements per week or more than three per day. The percentage of symptoms linked to an abnormal defecatory behaviour was well below 10%. Fifty-five percent of subjects reported at least one parameter of abnormal functioning; the most frequent was straining at stool and the rarer was the manual manoeuvres to help defecation. CONCLUSIONS: In normal subjects the prevalence of symptoms considered in Rome II criteria as part of an abnormal defecatory behaviour (in more than 25% of defecations) is well below 10%, manual manoeuvres are almost never used to help defecation, and the frequency of defecations is at least three per week.     

便秘症状与肛门直肠测压和结肠传输试验结果的相关性研究:166例临床分析

背景:便秘是最常见的消化系统问题之一,有观点认为不同便秘症状或症状群对慢性便秘的病理生理机制可能有一定提示作用。肛门直肠测压是研究便秘病理生理机制的重要手段。目的:探讨便秘症状与肛门直肠测压和结肠传输试验结果之间的相关性。方法:连续纳入166例功能性便秘患者,行肛门直肠测压和结肠传输试验,并记录其排便次数减少、粪便干结、排便费力、排便不尽感、肛门梗阻感和腹胀症状发生情况。分析上述症状与两项检测结果的相关性。结果:腹胀组直肠最小感觉阈值降低发生率、排便次数减少组和排便费力组直肠推进力不足发生率均显著高于相应症状阴性组(P0.05),直肠肛门抑制反射不良组排便费力发生率显著低于反射正常组(P0.05);结肠慢传输以及肛门括约肌松弛不良、直肠肛门矛盾运动均与便秘症状无关。结论:排便次数减少和排便费力对直肠推进力不足有提示作用,腹胀则与直肠感觉过敏有关。深入细化便秘症状并综合考虑影响粪便性状的因素可能对慢性便秘的病理生理分型具有更好的提示作用。     

痔、便秘及腹泻的相关性调查

目的探索痔和便秘及腹泻的关系。方法通过目的抽样,采用定量研究的方法,对去医院消化内科就诊的便秘或腹泻患者和普外科就诊的痔病患者进行问卷调查,共138例,并对每一位患者进行直肠镜(或)结肠镜检查。结果138例就诊者中痔病患者81例(占58.7%),功能性便秘患者37例,功能性腹泻患者49例。痔合并功能性便秘者29例(占35.8%),痔合并功能性腹泻者24例(占29.6%)。功能性便秘患者中78.4%合并痔病,功能性腹泻患者中49.0%合并痔病。结论痔与功能性便秘或功能性腹泻关系密切,痔可导致和加重便秘,腹泻可诱发痔。     

Classification and treatment of constipation]

Constipation is a common symptom affecting 2-27% of general population in Western countries. According to a population-based study on bowel habits in a Korean community, the prevalence was 16.5% for self-reported constipation and 9.2% for functional constipation. There is a broad range of causes for constipation. There are three subtypes in functional constipation, although overlap is not uncommon. Physiologic studies such as colonic transit test, anorectal manometry, balloon expulsion test, and defecography can be helpful in further evaluating and classifying functional constipation. Slow transit constipation is characterized by prolongation of transit time through- out the colon, caused by either myopathy or neuropathy. Functional defecation disorder is characterized as an inability to initiate defecation following the urge to do so, a feeling of incomplete evacuation, tenesmus, excessive straining or manual evacuation. Normal transit constipation is the most common subtype and characterized by constipation occurring in the presence of normal colonic transit time and normal defecatory function. It is important for clinicians to choose appropriate treatment for constipation which are most efficacious for the individual patient. Most patients with functional constipation respond to laxatives, but a small proportion may be resistant to this treatment. In patients with functional defecation disorder, biofeedback is helpful. Sacral nerve stimulation may be helpful in some patients with slow transit constipation. Patients who are resistant to all the conservative modalities may require surgical intervention. Extensive clinical and physiological preoperative assessment of patients with slow colonic transit time is essential before considering surgery, including an assessment of small bowel motility and identification of coexistent defecatory disorder.     

Referral for anorectal function evaluation is indicated in 65% and beneficial in 92% of patients

AIM： To determine the indicated referrals to a tertiary centre for patients with anorectal symptoms, the effect of the advised treatment and the discomfort of the tests.
METHODS： In a retrospective study, patients referred for anorectal function evaluation （AFE） between May 2004 and October 2006 were sent a questionnaire, as were the doctors who referred them. AFE consisted of anal manometry, rectal compliance measurement and anal endosonography. An indicated referral was defined as needing AFE to establish a diagnosis with clinical consequence （fecal incontinence without diarrhea, 3^rd degree anal sphincter rupture, congenital anorectal disorder, inflammatory bowel disease with anorectal complaints and preoperative in patients for re-anastomosis or enterostoma, anal fissure, fistula or constipation）. Anal ultrasound is always indicated in patients with fistula, anal manometry and rectal compliance when impaired continence reserve is suspected. The therapeutic effect was noted as improvement, no improvement but reassurance, and deterioration. RESULTS： From the 216 patients referred, 167 （78%） returned the questionnaire. The referrals were indicated in 65%. Of these, 80% followed the proposed advice. Improvement was achieved in 35% and a reassurance in 57% of the patients, no difference existed between patient groups. On a VAS scale （1 to 10） symptoms improved from 4.0 to 7.2. Most patients reported no or little discomfort with AFE.
CONCLUSION： Referral for AFE was indicated in 65%. Beneficial effect was seen in 92%： 35% improved and 57% was reassured. Advice was followed in 80%. Better instruction about indication for AFE referral is warranted.     

Symptom differences in moderate to severe IBS patients based on predominant bowel habit

OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine if irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) patients with different bowel habit predominance differ in self-reported viscerosensory symptoms related to the upper and lower gastrointestinal (GI) tract, somatosensory symptoms, and constitutional functions. METHODS: Six hundred and twenty-five Rome criteria-positive IBS patients completed a bowel symptom questionnaire (BSQ), psychological symptom checklist (SCL-90), and health status (SF-36). Bowel habit predominance for IBS patients was determined using the Rome criteria for functional constipation (IBS-C; n = 140) and functional diarrhea (IBS-D; n = 216). The BSQ included questions about viscerosensory symptoms of the upper (chest pressure, bloating, fullness, early satiety, nausea) and lower GI tract (bloating, pain, incomplete evacuation), somatosensory symptoms related to the musculoskeletal system (pain in neck/shoulders, lower back/hip, muscles/joints), and constitutional functions (sleep, appetite, libido). Analysis was further conducted between the IBS-C and IBS-D patients, controlling for gender and quality of sleep, and using the Bonferroni correction to control for multiple comparisons. RESULTS: Female gender was more prevalent among IBS-C than IBS-D (77% vs 56.1%, p < 0.01), whereas age did not differ (40.2 +/- 1.2 yr vs 39.5 +/- 1.0 yr). Symptoms referred to the upper GI were more prevalent in IBS-C than IBS-D: early satiety (56.7% vs 33.9%, p < 0.004), fullness (63.2% vs 38.5%, p < 0.05), and a trend for upper bloating (80.3 vs 62.6%). IBS-C patients reported higher severity ratings for lower GI bloating (p < 0.001). IBS-C more commonly reported musculoskeletal symptoms (92.2% vs 75.4%, p < 0.001), as well as impairment in sleep (31.3 vs 17.5%, p < 0.009), appetite (35.0% vs 18.4%, p < 0.015) and sexual function (45.2% vs 33.1%, p < 0.0021). There were no differences in SCL-90 and SF-36 scores. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the IBS-D group, the IBS-C patients show greater prevalence of a wide range of symptoms referred to the upper and lower abdomen, musculoskeletal, and constitutional functions. These findings may be related to differences in autonomic or perceptual responses to visceral and somatic stimuli, and are likely to have implications for treatment responses in the two subgroups.     

Assessment of Rectocolonic Morphology and Function in Patients with Chagas Disease in Barcelona (Spain)

The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between colonic symptoms, radiological abnormalities, and anorectal dysfunction in patients with Chagas disease. We performed a cross-sectional study of untreated patients diagnosed with Chagas disease. All patients were evaluated clinically (by a questionnaire for colonic symptoms based on Rome III criteria) and underwent a barium enema and anorectal manometry. A control group of patients with functional constipation and without Chagas disease was included in the study. Overall, 69 patients were included in the study: 42 patients were asymptomatic and 27 patients had abdominal symptoms according to Rome III criteria. Anorectal manometry showed a higher proportion of abnormalities in symptomatic patients than in asymptomatic ones (73% versus 21%, respectively; P < 0.0001). Megarectum was detected in a similar proportion in the different subgroups regardless of the presence of symptoms or abnormalities in anorectal functions. Among non-Chagas disease patients with functional constipation, 90% had an abnormal anorectal manometry study. Patients with Chagas disease present a high proportion of constipation with dyssynergic defecation in anorectal manometry but a low prevalence of impaired rectoanal inhibitory reflex, although these abnormalities may be nonspecific for Chagas disease. The presence of megarectum is a nonspecific finding.     

Validation of Rome II criteria for functional gastrointestinal disorders by factor analysis of symptoms in Asian patient sample

BACKGROUND: It has been unclear as to whether the Rome II criteria could be applied to patients in the Asia region with functional gastrointestinal (GI) diseases. The aim of the present study was to determine if symptoms of Asian patients with functional gastrointestinal disorders formed groups which corresponded to the Rome II diagnostic criteria. METHODS: A modified English version of Talley's bowel disease questionnaire was developed in collaboration with various research teams in accordance with the Rome II criteria. This instrument was translated into the local languages of the following nine Asian regions: China, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Korea, Malaysia, Singapore, Taiwan, Thailand and Vietnam. From September to December 2001, newly enrolled outpatients attending 14 GI or medical clinics in these regions were invited to complete the questionnaire. From these respondents, patients with functional gastrointestinal disorders fulfilling the '12 weeks out of 12 months' criteria were separated for further analysis. Principal component factor analysis with varimax rotation was used to identify symptom clusters or factors. These factors were compared with the existing classification of functional GI diseases derived from the Rome II criteria. RESULTS: Factor analysis of symptoms from 1012 functional GI patients supported the Rome II classification of the following groups of functional GI disorders: diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome, functional constipation, functional dyspepsia, functional abdominal pain syndrome, functional heartburn, and functional vomiting. Functional diarrhea was combined with functional anorectal disorders, and globus merged with functional dysphagia into one factor. Some of the functional dyspepsia, abdominal bloating and belching symptoms were loaded into one factor. CONCLUSIONS: Factor analysis of symptoms from a sample of Asian patients with functional GI disorders partially supported the use of the Rome II classification.     

A patient questionnaire to identify bowel disease

Although functional gastrointestinal symptoms are seen frequently by internists and are the commonest reason for patients to be referred to gastroenterologists, no validated self-report questionnaire is available for their diagnosis. To differentiate among non-ulcer dyspepsia, the irritable bowel syndrome, organic gastrointestinal disease, and health, we developed a self-report questionnaire. Our bowel disease questionnaire, which evaluated 46 symptom-related items was completed prospectively by 361 subjects before their clinical evaluation as outpatients. Of these subjects, 115 were categorized ultimately as having functional bowel disease (non-ulcer dyspepsia or the irritable bowel syndrome), 101 were categorized ultimately as having organic gastrointestinal disease, and 145 were healthy persons having routine periodic examinations for whom no additional diagnoses were made. All diagnoses were based on independent clinical evaluations, not on the patients' responses to the questionnaire. The bowel disease questionnaire was acceptable and easily completed; it elicited symptoms in a highly reliable manner and was shown to be a valid measure of functional bowel complaints. Our questionnaire discriminated non-ulcer dyspepsia from irritable bowel syndrome with a sensitivity of 75% and a specificity of 72%, and it discriminated functional bowel disease from organic disease and health with sensitivities of 85% and 83%, and specificities of 60% and 76%, respectively. We believe that this questionnaire is an additional and useful diagnostic tool for identifying patients with functional gastrointestinal symptoms.     

Anal manometric studies in hemorrhoids and anal fissures

Manometric study with the use of continuous water perfusion system was performed on 50 patients with Grade III or IV hemorrhoids and for 29 patients with chronic anal fissure. Another 36 patients who had no anorectal symptoms or pathology were chosen as the control group. The maximal basal pressures for the controls, hemorrhoids, and chronic anal fissures 71.2±24.9, 85.3±27.7, and 87.4±38.8 mmHg, respectively; the maximal contraction pressures for the controls, hemorrhoids, and fissures were 132.9±44.9, 158.8±58.0, and 162.1±64.5 mmHg, respectively; the lengths of the functional sphincter of the three groups were 3.7±0.5, 3.8±0.8, and 3.9±0.6 cm, respectively. The maximal basal pressures and maximal contraction pressures of the hemorrhoid and fissure patients were significantly greater than those of the control group (t testP value <0.05); whereas the functional sphincter lengths ofthe three groups showed no significant difference.     

Combined anorectal manometry and defecography in 50 consecutive adults with fecal incontinence

Fifty consecutive patients presenting with fecal incontinence were evaluated prospectively with anorectal manometry, defecography, and other tests of anorectal function to assess the clinical utility of defecography in fecal incontinence. Leakage of contrast at rest and failure to narrow the anorectal angle with pelvic squeezing were specific but not sensitive predictors of decreased sphincter pressures as determined by manometry. Thus, after manometry, defecography provided no additional information regarding sphincter strength. Retention of contrast in large rectoceles or incomplete rectal evacuation at defecography had excellent correlation with the presence of clinical symptoms of outlet obstruction constipation (present concurrently with incontinence) and indicated an etiology of outlet obstruction symptoms. Defecography may provide useful information in incontinent patients with outlet obstruction constipation symptoms but has little additive value to anorectal manometry in incontinent patients without such symptoms.     

Constipation: evaluation and treatment

Constipation is a common clinical problem that comprises a constellation of symptoms that include excessive straining, hard stools, feeling of incomplete evacuation, use of digital maneuvers, or infrequent defecation. Although many conditions, such as metabolic problems, fiber deficiency, anorectal problems, and drugs, can cause constipation, when excluded functional constipation consists of two subtypes: slow-transit constipation and dyssynergic defecation. Some patients with irritable bowel syndrome may exhibit features of both types of constipation. The Rome criteria for functional constipation together with modifications proposed here for dyssynergic defecation may serve as useful guidelines for making a diagnosis. Recent advances in technology, together with a better understanding of the underlying mechanisms, have led to real progress in the diagnosis of this condition. Management options are limited, however, and evidence to support these treatments is only modest. The treatment is primarily medical; surgical options should be reserved for refractory disease and after careful diagnostic work-up. Although laxatives remain the mainstay of therapy, prokinetics that are colon-selective are optimal for treating patients with slow-transit constipation, but they are not yet available for clinical use. Recent controlled trials, however, are promising. Biofeedback therapy is the preferred treatment for patients with dyssynergia, but is not widely available. In the near future, user-friendly biofeedback programs including home therapy may facilitate wider use of these methods for patients with dyssynergic defecation.